Hogeschool van Amsterdam Aviation Studies College year 2009/2010
Class: 2A1A Deborah van Beek Jonathan Davidsz Joran Hoogenberg Hessel Kramer Ted Lagziel Jorden Olthof Jamie Ruiter
Amsterdam, 1April 2010
Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.
Problem definition................................................................................................................................. 2
2.
Objective ............................................................................................................................................... 2
3.
Delimitation ........................................................................................................................................... 3
4.
Reading List ........................................................................................................................................... 7
5.
Appendix list .......................................................................................................................................... 9
2
Introduction The project group 2A1A, from ‘Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Aviation Studies’, has been assigned by Rotterdam the Hague Airport to locate a new area, for a new airport that has to take over the general aviation [GA] that now operates on Rotterdam the Hague airport. This is required because Rotterdam airport tends to reach their noise nuisance maximums. Rotterdam airport therefore wants to use their current space and number of movements for more business aviation, because the number of movements has been limited. General Aviation are all civilian flying except scheduled passenger airlines. The new area needs to be designed properly, so Rotterdam Airport will get an approval for building the new airport. Therefore there need to be looked at things like noise pollution and the length of the runway(s). The new airport will have the same facilities as the current airport. This start document consists of three chapters, which indicate the course that will be followed for the complete report. The description of situation and objectives will form the first chapter, in which the problems will be defined (1). The project group proceeds to formulate the result, as intended by the employer, in the objective definition (2). According to the rules that are drawn up by the instructing party, a delimitation chapter will follow (3). To structure the project, a pyramid model is made. Eventually, an explanation of the pyramid model will be given to indicate how the project group assembled the structure for the final report. The most significant sources used for the report are Wentzel (2009) and IJspeert (2009/2010). A complete list of literature that is used is put at the end of the report, where also the supplements section can be found. The most important supplements are the project assignment(I) and the teamwork points that need to be improved(VII).
1
1. Problem definition The board of Rotterdam The Hague Airport has given the assignment to project group 2A1A to research the possibility of building a new regional airport that will take over the General Aviation [GA] which operates on Rotterdam Airport. Rotterdam Airport wants to keep the GA, but they tend to reach the maximum allowed number of movements. With a new airport solely for GA the amount of movements of Rotterdam will be decreased thus allowing more business activities that suit better to the goals of this regional airport. With the new airport solely for GA the noise pollution at Rotterdam Airport will decrease, and the number of business flights is able to increase. However, the GA still needs a good alternative airport, so the new airport should at least have the same facilities as Rotterdam Airport, which the GA is used to. The project group will make a design plan for the new airport that need to get a ‘luchthavenbesluit’.
2. Objective The goal of the project group is to replace the General Aviation of Rotterdam Airport, to a new airport. The new airport has to be designed by the project group. Before developing and build a new airport there must be requested a license, the “luchthaven besluit”. To do so the group has to find out which subjects have to be examined. There are several subjects to take in consideration like immovable property, sound nuisance and military airspace. The new airport must follow all demands which will make it possible to make a serious request. Rotterdam Airport must be analyzed to ensure that the GA has all the facilities that they are used to on the present used airport. The reason is to make the location of the new airport acceptable for the GA otherwise they will object the proposal and the negotiation can take years. The new airport must be easy to reach by public transport and by car. The project group will examine the possibilities of several locations. The main purpose is that the request for the build of a new airport is made as soon as possible. This means that there must be as less as possible objection against the new airport, which can result in a license to build in the least amount of time. The report will support the advice that the project group gives to the board of Rotterdam the Hague airport. The aim that project group 1A has is to make the best report of the fourth period. Project Airport must be well implemented. To do so the contents of the report must follow some technical requirements that must be handled correct, but also the cooperation and communication within the project group must be well. The group wants to accomplish this goal by good communication. So meetings have to be planned properly and the group has to be well prepared. Records have to be made really clear so every appointment that has been made can be found. The chairman has to lead the group well and keep an eye on everything that needs to be done and that targets will be reached in time. If there are any problems he or she has to think about solutions. Thus the chairman has the ultimate responsibility in supervising the team so problems will come to light and can be resolved properly. To improve the group teamwork two improvement points have been formed and subjoined. The individual improvement point scan be found in appendix VI. 2
Make clear minutes with clear group appointments and deadlines and make sure you meet these appointments and deadlines. If you should explain a difficult part of the report, do not give it up but ask your other group members to help you.
3. Delimitation and structure In the pyramid model (appendix II) the arrangement of chapters and paragraphs is determined. The model is an clear overview of all chapters and paragraphs. The pyramid model is divided into three chapters. The first chapter will a general description of the airport operation and the airport facilities. Besides, the regulations will be analyzed. This is needed, because there should be made clear what features and facilities an airport should have before the group is possible to look at possible locations for the new airport. The second chapter will describe the demands of the location for the new airport. After that, the possible locations will be described and compared, the most suitable location will be chosen. The third chapter will give an analyze of the operation on the new airport, the airport lay-out and all facilities that the new airport provides. When the new airport design plan has been made, all information for a ‘luchthavenbesluit’ is assembled. The exact description of the chapters and subparagraphs can be found in the explanation of the pyramid model, whereby the project is delimitated (3.1). Moreover there will be described what mode of operation the group will use when doing this project, whereby the group agreements will be presented (3.2).
3.1. Explanation pyramid model The content of the chapters and subparagraphs that have been presented in the pyramid model will be described particularly. 1. Airport aspects: In this chapter will be explained how the aviation can be classified, what aspects are important for an airport, how an airport looks like and what regulations come to play with an airport. 1.1. General Aviation: In this paragraph will be explained what kind of airports there are and which aircrafts belong to this kind of aviation and how it is divided in recreation-, business aviation etc. 1.1.1. Aircraft classes: This subparagraph will explain what are the largest and heaviest aircrafts that operate on Rotterdam airport and what purpose they serve. 1.1.2. Airport classes: This subparagraph will explain what kind of airports there are and what the difference are between regional airports and national airports. 1.2. Airport facilities: In this paragraph will be explained how an aerodrome looks like and what other things are placed in this zone. 1.2.1. Runway: This subparagraph will explain what the lay-out of a runway is and how the length of the runway is calculated. 1.2.2. Taxiway: This subparagraph will explain what a taxiway is, what purpose it serves and what aspects are important for the taxiway. 1.2.3. Signs: This subparagraph will explain what signs are used on runways; such as painted stripes on the road, lighting and (electric) traffic signs. 1.2.4. Apron: This subparagraph will explain what apron is, where the apron exists of and what consequences there are for refueling on the airport. 1.2.5. Hangar: This subparagraph will explain what procedures take place in a hangar and how much space is required for parking the GA aircrafts. 3
1.2.6. Terminal: This subparagraph will explain what a terminal is and what purpose it serves. 1.3. Airspace and control: In this paragraph will be explained how the airspace is divided and who is responsible to control this zone. 1.3.1. Control area: This subparagraph will explain which tasks the Air Traffic Control will have in different airspace zones. 1.3.2. Airspace classes: This subparagraph will explain what classes there are in the airspace. 1.3.3. Flight rules: This subparagraph will explain what flight rules are important in the region of an airport. 1.3.4. Routes: This subparagraph will explain what flight paths there are in the region of an airport. 1.4. Flight aspects: In this paragraph will be explained how aircrafts safety can leave or enter an airport. 1.4.1. Meteorology: This subparagraph will explain which weather conditions are important to operate at an airport. This consist the runway usage, for example. 1.4.2. Navigation: This subparagraph will explain which systems are used to navigate aircrafts and how this systems can be controlled. 1.5. Regulations and demands: In this paragraph will be explained what laws there are and what is needed to get an ‘luchthavenbesluit’. 1.5.1. Aeronautical legislation: This subparagraph will explain what important rules are set by getting an ‘luchthavenbesluit’. The WLV and LVW will be explained and there will be explained what a ‘Luchthavenbesluit’ and a ‘Luchthavenregeling’ is. 1.5.2. Sound regulations: This subparagraph will explain how the sound intensity can be measured, what sound pollution is, what maximum noise in the environment (of Rotterdam airport) is allowed and what ways there are to reduce the amount of noise. 2. Airport locations: In this chapter will be explained which two locations might be suitable and which locations fulfill the demands of the employer. The possible locations will be compared and one location is chosen. 2.1. Location demands: In this paragraph will be explained what demands are important for an airport. There will be described what these factors consist of. 2.1.1. Landscape: In this subparagraph will be described what the ground type could be. Further, the dimension of the location for the new airport is described and the land possession, according to ‘het kadaster’ will be considered too. 2.1.2. Environment: : In this subparagraph will be researched what the environment should look like (no mountains of other obstacles). 2.1.3. Accessibility: In this subparagraph will be explained that the users of the General Aviation of Rotterdam that will move to the new airport must have a good alternative accessibility. For example, a good accessibility of the new airport by public transportation is a necessity. 2.1.4. Weather: In this subparagraph will be explained that the weather conditions are not constant. The direction of the wind is very important when choosing a suitable location for an airport. 2.1.5. Flight routes: In this subparagraph will be explained that the flight movements of the aircrafts should be according to the predetermined flight routes. The new airport should have a good connectivity with the flight routes, but the flight routes of the new airport should not cross the flight routes that already exist. 2.2. Potential location: In this paragraph will be explained what the possible locations are and the aspects of 2.1. will be used to chose one of these. 2.2.1. Location 1: In this subparagraph will be explained how the first location meets the needed aspects when a new airport is designed.
4
2.2.2. Location 2: In this subparagraph will be explained how the second location meets the needed aspects when a new airport is designed. 2.3. Comparison: In this paragraph will be explained what the advantages and disadvantages are of each location and a comparison will be made by the use of a schedule. 2.4. Conclusion: In this paragraph the choice of the location will be explained. 3. GA-airport: In this chapter will be explained what the lay-out is of the new airport. The facilities on the new airport are explained. Further, the design aspect are examined, whereby a design plan is presented to the board of Rotterdam the Hague airport by giving an advice. 3.1. Airport design: In this paragraph will be explained what plans there are for the new airport design. 3.1.1. North oriented map: Here will be described and displayed what the lay-out is of the new airport The size is described and the location, length, signs and foundation of the runway will be described. 3.1.2. Taxiways: In this paragraph, the taxiways will be described, that can be used to reach the runway. 3.1.3. Apron: In this paragraph, the apron will be described and there will be explained what function the apron serves. 3.1.4. Hangar: There will be described what function the hangar serves, what the size is of the hangar and what aircrafts can be parked in the hangar. 3.1.5. Terminal: The terminal will be explained by describing the facilities in the new terminal (shops, restaurants. These will be equal to Rotterdam the Hague airports facilities that the GA uses at this moment). 3.1.6. Public parking: The public parking space will be described (capacity, accessibility). 3.2. Airport operation assistance: In this paragraph is explained what the security services are, what ATC is located on the new general aviation airport and how meteorology information is obtained. 3.2.1. Service of security: This paragraph gives an explanation of the security services at the new airport. These are: the customs, airport security, fire brigade. 3.2.2. Air traffic control: In this paragraph will explain what air traffic control is located on the new airport or which air traffic control center takes over the control of the new airport. 3.2.3. Meteorology: In this subparagraph will be described what instruments are used to assemble meteorology information and how the weather conditions affect the airport operations. 3.3. Environment aspects: This paragraph gives a description of the factors that have a direct influence on the environment and the inhabitants that live close to the airport. 3.3.1. Opening hours: In this subparagraph will be described when the airport will be open en why these opening hours are handled. 3.3.2. Noise nuisance: This paragraph gives a description of the noise nuisance at the airport an close to it. Moreover, the noise exposure boundaries are described and displayed. 3.3.3. Developments: In this paragraph will be described which airport developments can be expected and whether the airport can be enlarged in the future. 3.4. Financial aspects: The costs and benefits of the new airport will be explained, so that the board of Rotterdam Airport gets an assessments of the costs and profits of the new airport. 3.4.1. Costs: The cost items will be explained 3.4.2. Benefits: The benefits of the new airport will be explained and the profit of the airport will be valued. 3.5. Advice: This paragraph explains the design advice and summarizes all aspects that should be taken into consideration a ‘luchthavenbesluit’ is required.
5
3.2. Operation procedure To structure the project group appointments should be made, whereby the mode of operation of the project group is determined. The tasks that have been presented in the pyramid model will be spread over all group members, this spreading is covered in the project planning (Appendix III). Moreover the group made lay-out regulations where in the lay-out of the project report has been covered, so all group members use the same lay-out (Appendix IV). During the project airport operations, the group will have meetings. To structure these meetings, every week a minutes secretary and chairman has been selected (Appendix V). To be able to contact the other group members, a contact list has been added (Appendix VII). At last, general group agreements have been formed. All group members should meet the subjoined agreements, whereby several disorders will be prevented. The following rules affects anyone in this group without exceptions:
All group members make sure that they take actively part in the project. All deadlines and group agreements should be written down punctually by the records secretary. Everyone is to make sure that his work is checked before the deadline is reached. Everyone must use the correct lay-out. (Appendix IV) In case of absence or delay longer than five minutes, you have to call the chairman. If you do not call or you do not have a valid reason, you will get an official warning. After you get two official warnings, the group will discuss the situation with the project teacher. Three warnings means that you will be removed from the group. The chairman of the week is responsible for checking the other group members. During the week while fulfilling the job of chairman, you are responsible for reserving classrooms for project meetings. If you will be caught on plagiarism, you will immediately be removed from the group. The chairman must send the items on the agenda, 24 hours before the meeting, by e-mail. In case, the items on the agenda cannot be sent 24 hours before the meeting, it has to be sent before 8 pm the day before. Important agreements and deadlines appointments have to be communicated by e-mail. The secretary publicizes his records on BSCW within 24 hours after the meeting. Everyone reads and checks the last records on BSCW before the next meeting.
6
4. Reading List Books Dale De Remer, Ph.D. Global navigation for pilots Techniques and procedures 2nd edition 1993-1998 David hoy Instrument flying A guide to the instrument rating UK, 1995 H.H. van den Kroonenberg & F.J. Siers Methodisch ontwerpen (2004) Noordhoff Anderson Jr, John D. Introduction to flight 5e druk USA, 2005 Laban, Victor Aërodynamica Amsterdam, 2008/2009 Hogeschool van Amsterdam Domein techniek Wentzel, T Opbouw projectverslag Amsterdam, 2009 Hogeschool van Amsterdam Domein techniek E-Books International Standards and Recommended Practices ICAO Annex 12, 14 en 16 4th edition Montreal, 1995 Customers and Actors of ATM: General Aviation Val H.K. EGGERS Air & Space Europe Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2000, Pages 50-52 Databank Science Direct 7
Op maat databank Regeling seinen luchtvaart (tekst geldig vanaf 31-10-2009) http://rps.hva.nl:2305/opmaat/show.do?&type=wenr&key=286219#firsthit Knovel databank Airport Design and Operation (2nd Edition) Search Within By: Kazda, Antonín; Caves, Robert E. © 2007 Emerald, Inc. Description: This book includes some important changes in the international regulations covering design and operations. Op Maat Databank Aanvullend luchthavenreglement Rotterdam (tekst geldig vanaf 01-11-2009) http://rps.hva.nl:2305/opmaat/show.do?&type=wenr&key=263629#firsthit Websites www.rotterdam-airport.nl Cijfers verkeer- en vervoer Rotterdam, totaal per maand (2010) Last visit: april 2010 http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0008540/geldigheidsdatum_13-04-2010#Hoofdstuk6 Regeling geluidwerende voorzieningen 1997 Geldend op 13-04-2010 Last visit: april 2010 https://intra.techniek.hva.nl/AVI/0809/Jaar1/PROJ-4_14/Studiemateriaal/Van-DeventerBasiskennis_Geluidzonering_Luchtvaart.pdf Last visit: april 2010 http://www.wetboek-online.nl/wet/Luchtvaartwet.html Geluid bij een luchthaven http://www.natuurkunde.nl/artikelen/view.do?supportId=601701 Last visit: april 2010 Wet- en Regelgeving http://wetten.overheid.nl/zoeken/ Last visit: april 2010 http://www.lvnl-ohd.nl/index.html Operational help desk LVNL Last visit: april 2010 http://www.aviationinfo.nl/index.php?page=startbaan Runway features Last visit: april 2010
8
5. Appendix list I
Project assignment
II
Pyramid model
III
Project planning
IV
Lay-out regulations
V
Chairman and secretary schedule
VI
Improvements previous project
VII
Contact list
9
Appendix I
Project assignment
1. De projectopdracht Via de projectopdracht wordt jullie gevraagd onderzoek te verrichten naar alle aspecten, van belang voor de verkrijging van een provinciale “Aanwijzing” voor een nieuwe regionale luchthaven. Locatie, inrichting en omvang van het terrein zijn hierbij van belang (1.1). Voor het eerst zal in het projectwerk een competitie-element worden ingevoerd. Alle groepen maken een in het oog springende poster op A3 formaat, en van de drie - door docenten als beste beoordeelde - projectgroepen wordt het verslag opgestuurd aan specialisten op het gebied van Airport Operations; deze bepalen vervolgens welke groep uiteindelijk het goud, zilver of brons heeft verdiend (1.2). Met randvoorwaarden wordt het kader weergegeven, waarbinnen het project moet worden uitgevoerd (1.3). Het project moet door de student volledig zijn behaald, om toegelaten te worden tot het tweede jaar (1.4). 1.1 De opdracht
Het probleem, waar Rotterdam The Hague Airport (of: Luchthaven Rotterdam) mee kampt, en de doelstelling voor de nabije toekomst wordt hieronder eerst neergezet in de Uitgangssituatie, waarna de Opdracht aan de projectteams zelf wordt geformuleerd. Uitgangssituatie Luchthaven Rotterdam wil – ter beperking van de geluidshinder en een dreigende overschrijding van de capaciteit aan toegestane vliegbewegingen – af van de GA. De vrijkomende capaciteit wil men dan gaan benutten voor meer zakelijke activiteiten, die beter passen bij de doelstellingen van deze regionale luchthaven. De directie van de luchthaven zal echter met acceptabele alternatieven moeten komen voor de met uitplaatsing bedreigde groep recreatieve vliegers, vliegscholen en luchttaxibedrijven. Het nieuwe terrein moet deze groep dezelfde mogelijkheden bieden, als waaraan men op Luchthaven Rotterdam gewend was. De bewoners in de directe omgeving van de nieuw aan te wijzen luchthaven mogen geen (ernstige) hinder ondervinden na de ingebruikname ervan. Dit kan de duur van de procedure om tot een Luchthavenbesluit dan wel Luchthavenregeling te komen zoveel mogelijk beperken. Opdrachtformulering De directie van Luchthaven Rotterdam geeft het projectteam opdracht onderzoek te doen naar alle aspecten, van belang voor het verkrijgen van een Luchthavenbesluit of -regeling voor de nieuwe luchthaven. Van dit terrein zullen na ingebruikname uitsluitend vliegtuigen mogen starten en landen met een maximum startmassa tot en met 7000 kg 2. Hiermee kan bijvoorbeeld de omvang van het terrein worden vastgesteld (lengte van benodigde start- en taxibaan/banen), maar ook welke faciliteiten er ter afhandeling van het verkeer zoal benodigd zijn. Een Noord georiënteerde kaart zal dit tot in detail moeten aangeven. Ter vereenvoudiging van de opdracht wordt aangenomen, dat de nieuwe luchthaven past binnen reeds bestaande bestemmingsplannen en daarmee ook niet strijdig is. Het terrein bevat geen onroerende 1
zaken van derden die onteigend zouden moeten worden. Het onderzoek van het team zal als basis fungeren voor de aanvraag tot Aanwijzing van een nieuwe luchthaven, die bij voorkeur (maar niet noodzakelijk) ergens ten zuiden van Rotterdam binnen de provincie Zuid Holland komt te liggen. 2 Deze
gewichtsgrens hangt samen met de indeling van vliegtuigen in categorieën van “Wake Turbulence”
Richtlijnen Hoe groot moet een locatie bij benadering zijn om de luchthaven hierop in te richten? Welke locaties komen in aanmerking voor dit terrein (denk daarbij aan bereikbaarheid vanaf Rotterdam; ligging ten opzichte van steden en dorpen, militaire of industriegebieden; eventuele obstakels in aan- en uitvliegroutes; of ligging in de buurt van andere, drukke vliegvelden en hun aan- en uitvliegroutes)? Welke activiteiten mogen op de in te richten luchthaven plaatsvinden (wel of geen ULV/zweefvliegactiviteiten/parachutisten)? En binnen welke openstellingstijden? Hoeveel start- en landingsbanen zijn benodigd, en wat zijn de verlangde eigenschappen (gras, asfalt, lengte, breedte)? In welke kompasrichting moet de hoofdstartbaan komen te liggen en hoe verlopen hier vandaan de aan- en uitvliegroutes? Welke voorzieningen zijn benodigd ten behoeve van de vliegers (verkeersleiding, navigatiesystemen als ILS, baanverlichting, internationaal voorgeschreven signalering)? Welke voorzieningen zijn benodigd ten behoeve van het afhandelen van de vliegtuigen (vliegveldautoriteiten en havendienst; hangaars voor stalling en/of reparatie; vliegtuigopstelplaatsen op een platform; mogelijkheden tot het leveren van brandstof voor zowel zuiger- als straalmotoren; terminal voor afhandeling van passagiers en hun bagage, of juist géén passagiers; restaurant; parkeergelegenheid, beveiligingsmaatregelen…)? Wat is het verwachte gebruik op jaarbasis en welke ontwikkelingen zijn hierin te voorzien? Maak zelf een realistische schatting van dit gebruik door “types vliegtuigen”, binnen het totaal aantal vliegbewegingen; zie de Bijlage voor typegerelateerde noise certificates. Bereken op basis van dit geschatte gebruik de geluidsbelasting in één van de verplichte handhavingspunten (berekening van het Externe Veiligheidsrisico is niet nodig). Waar kunnen kosten worden verwacht, verbonden aan de inrichting en exploitatie van het terrein en hoeveel bedragen de indicatieve inkomsten uit luchtvaartactiviteiten? 2.2 Competitie binnen het project In dit project wordt voor het eerst een Competitie-element ingevoerd en kunnen projectgroepen beloond worden met een rondvlucht (1e prijs), een bezoek aan het militaire luchtverkeersleidingscentrum Dutch Mil (2e prijs) of een bezoek aan een andere luchtvaartlokatie. Hiervoor selecteert het team van projectdocenten uit alle ingeleverde projectverslagen de drie beste. Deze worden opgestuurd naar het bedrijfsleven. Daar wordt door professionals op het gebied van Airport Operations de uiteindelijke volgorde bepaald: welke van deze drie projectgroepen heeft met hun verslag het probleem het sterkst aangepakt. Rond woensdag 30 juni wordt de uitslag hiervan via een mededeling op het intranet bekend gemaakt. Een ander competitie-element ontstaat door uitvoering van de Zelfsturende Opdracht “Poster Presentatie”, waarmee elke projectgroep door middel van een fraaie poster op A3 formaat in één oogopslag voor de toekomstige gebruikers de belangrijkste resultaten uit het verslag toont (als locatie, bereikbaarheid, openstellingsuren, faciliteiten en voorzieningen). Dit gebeurt vooral met figuren, kernwoorden en opvallende kleuren, en dus niet in tekstvorm. Alle posters worden na inlevering (op woensdag 26 mei) opgehangen op de tweede verdieping in het gebouw De Leeuwenburg, zodat de groepen van elkaars bevindingen kunnen 2
kennisnemen. Zowel de projectdocenten als de propedeusestudenten Aviation beoordelen deze posters met een cijfer, dat meetelt voor het uiteindelijke verslagcijfer. Ook hier rolt dan een poster van een projectgroep uit, die als beste wordt beoordeeld. Aan het eind van het schooljaar, rond woensdag 7 juli, zullen de drie groepen die als beste zijn beoordeeld hun project nogmaals presenteren in bijzijn van alle propedeusestudenten Aviation, de docenten en het bij dit project betrokken bedrijfsleven. Aansluitend zullen de winnaars van de posters bekend worden gemaakt, en vindt de prijsuitreiking plaats. 1.3 Randvoorwaarden De volgende randvoorwaarden zijn van toepassing bij dit project: De tijdsduur van het project is zeven weken en loopt van week 1 (15) tot 7 (22) met een onderbreking voor het meireces in kalenderweek 18; het projectverslag moet op donderdag 3 juni, uiterlijk om 17:00u zijn ingeleverd in docentenkamer A02.18. Uiterlijk aan het eind van week 2 (16) moet een Plan van Aanpak worden ingeleverd, waarin de planning van het project en taakverdeling in de groep is opgenomen. Het projectverslag, met daarin het advies aan de directie van Rotterdam Airport, voldoet verslagtechnisch aan de richtlijnen in het dictaat Wentzel (2009). Het verslag wordt geschreven in de Engelse taal en heeft, exclusief Bijlagen, een omvang van 30-40 pagina’s. Typisch Nederlandse termen uit de Wet- en Regelgeving, als Luchthavenbesluit, mogen bij dit project echter onvertaald worden opgenomen. Markeer deze dan met aanhalingstekens of door de term te cursiveren. In de Bijlagen is minimaal opgenomen één duidelijke overzichtstekening van de inrichting van het te ontwerpen vliegveld en één waarop de verwachte vliegroutes en geluidszones zijn opgenomen. Woensdag 26 mei moet de Zelfsturende Opdracht “Poster Presentatie” worden ingeleverd in docentenkamer A02.18, uiterlijk om 16.30u. Het verslag moet tweemaal in hardcopy (projectdocent, extra docent) en eenmaal in digitale vorm (één bestand in PDF) op CD worden aangeleverd (scan op plagiaat en vervolgens voor het bedrijfsleven). Op de CD zijn tevens alle groepsnotulen opgenomen. De groepen mogen in geen geval contact opnemen met (personeel van) Rotterdam Airport met een verzoek om informatie of een rondleiding. Dergelijke verzoeken worden eerst bij de projectdocent neergelegd, zodat vanuit de HvA één algemeen verzoek kan worden gedaan. Een paar jaar geleden heeft het alsmaar bellen en mailen van onze projectgroepen geleid tot een boze reactie van de luchthavendirectie. De opdracht is door de HvA bedacht en geschreven en is - nogmaals - fictief. 1.4 Belang van dit project voor de student Met dit project toont de student aan, dat hij de projectvaardigheden – en dus ook de bijbehorende competenties – als samenwerken in een team, oriënteren, plannen, definiëren, presenteren en rapporteren onder de knie heeft en daarmee hoofdfasewaardig is. In het aanzienlijk drukkere tweede studiejaar is geen ruimte om binnen het projectwerk nog steeds aan te modderen met deze vaardigheden. Om die reden heeft de opleiding een aanvullende eis gesteld in de Onderwijs- en Examenregeling met betrekking tot het Bindend Afwijzend Studieadvies [BAS]: het project van periode 4 moet volledig zijn behaald3. Studenten, die bijvoorbeeld voor het groepswerk laag zijn beoordeeld (lager dan een 5,5) of op de mondelinge (herkansings)toets een onvoldoende scoren, hebben daarmee het project niet behaald en krijgen dan een BAS-brief thuisgestuurd.
3
Appendix II
Pyramid model
4
Appendix III
Project planning
5
Appendix IV
Lay-out regulations
If the project group of the technical department wants to make this project a success, we need to make regulations on the lay-out of this report. Anybody writing a part of the report must obey the following rules: The font of this report will be “Calibri” and the font size is 11; All the text in this report will be lined out using ctrl+J in word 2007; References to appendix’ will be coded as follows (Appendix III); The following rules show how to use the several headings:
1. Hoofdstuk
Heading one
Text
no distance
1.1. Paragraaf
Heading two
Text
no distance
1.1.1. Sub-paragraaf Text
Heading tree no distance
1.1.1.a. Sub-sub-paragraaf Text
Heading four no distance
ad 1 Text
Heading five no distance
Adjes
Contents
Heading for contents
Text
no distance
Appendix
Heading for appendix
Text
no distance
Formula’s in this report must be in a two column table with two rows and a light orange background. The formula text itself has to a bold en is in the first column on the second row. The second column on the second row gives the units of the formula and the first row present the title of the formula and its number in the report, which are bold and font Calibri nine. (formula 1.1)
6
Formula (1.1) Pressure
P = Pressure in Pascal (Pa) F = Force in Newton (N) A = Area in square meter (m2)
The following rules affects the placement of an image. The images must be set in a table with two rows and two columns. The picture is in the upper left corner of the table, the components in the picture will be designated by dark blue arrows with a thickness of 1.5. the numbers behind the arrows are also dark blue and bold and are in a textbox. In the lower left corner the title of the image and it's number will be shown. This text has font Calibri nine and is selected bold. In the upper right corner the name and numbers corresponding from the image components are listed in bold. (image 1.1) 1. Right aileron 2. Left aileron 1
2
Image 1.1 Ailerons of an aircraft
The following lay-out rules affects on placing a table in the report. The first row shows the number of the table and it's title, this text has font size 9 and bold. Lines of this rows are invisible except for the lower line. The second row of the table gives information over the concerning columns, for example chairman and secretary.(table 1.1) This second row has font size 11 and is bold. The following rows are not bold.
7
Appendix V
Chairman / Secretary schedule
Week / Project Week
Chairman
Secretary
12-04 t/m 16-04
Deborah van Beek
Jonathan Davidsz
19-04 t/m 23-04
Jonathan Davidsz
Joran Hoogenberg
26-04 t/m 30-04
Joran Hoogenberg
Hessel Kramer
03-05 t/m 07-05
Vakantie
Vakantie
10-05 t/m 14-05
Hessel Kramer
Ted Lagziel
17-05 t/m 21-05
Ted Lagziel
Jorden Olthof
24-05 t/m 28-05
Jorden Olthof
Jamie Ruiter
31-05 t/m 04-06
Jamie Ruiter
Deborah
8
Appendix VI
Improvements previous project
Deborah :
If there is planned a beamer session, which is required, it is not practical to check the report with all group members together. Further, a week planned project is functional.
Jonathan:
Previous groups did not want to work at school, more group meetings should be planned, so that we are able to control each other.
Ted:
The ‘Plan van Aanpak’ took too much time previous projects. We should finish the PvA earlier so there is more time for the project report. Besides, the elimination should be more elaborated. The project teamwork should be improved compared to the last project.
Jorden:
During the previous project, most group members did not do a good literature survey before they started writing the project report.
Jamie:
All group members should use the same words when they write the paragraphs of the project report. For example, use the word ‘aircraft’ and not ‘airplane’. Moreover, the group should use the appointments and give warnings when group members do not meet the appointments.
Joran:
When appointments about deadlines are made, all group members should meet these appointments and when it is difficult to write a paragraph, ask your other group members to help you before the deadline. Further, the minutes that are made should be clear.
Hessel:
There should be made appointments about the usage of BSCW. When somebody changes a document, always use the ‘vergendel’ mode, that prevents the lost of written parts.
Improvement points
Make clear minutes with clear group appointments and deadlines and make sure you meet these appointments and deadlines. If you should explain a difficult part of the report, do not give it up but ask your other group members to help you.
9
Appendix VII Nr
Name
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Deborah van Beek Jonathan Davidsz Joran Hoogenberg Hessel Kramer Ted Lagziel Jorden Olthof Jamie Ruiter
Contact list Cell phone 06-55 375 185 06-51 524 987 06-21 677 404 06-49 678 069 06-41 663 306 06-40 655 544 06-41 290 180
E-mail home
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
E-mail HvA
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
10
