BIDANG ILMU HUKUM
LAPORAN HASIL PENELITIAN DISERTASI DOKTOR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010
Judul
Peneliti
: Kewenangan Komisi Kepolisian Nasional Terhadap Peningkatan Profesionalisme Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Polri) : Dahlil Marjon, SH. MH.
Dibiayai Oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional sesuai dengan Surat Perjanjian Penugasan Dalam Rangka Pelaksanaan Penugasan Penelitian Disertasi Doktor Tahun Anggaran 2010 Nomor : 492/SP2H/PP/DP2M/VI/2010, tanggal 11 Juni 2010.
Universitas Brawijaya Malang 2010
SUMMARY
The main legal issue in this writing is the inconsistency of the granting authority in making the Presidential Decree on the National Police Commission and Commission Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia. Indonesian National Police and Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia is the elements are interlinked in the Integrated Criminal Justice System. Commission Prosecutor and the National Police Commission is supporting the strengthening of the two elements of the performance of each institution as an external supervisor, especially in monitoring violations of the code of ethics and abuse of authority other duties. As the two supporting elements should have criteria and procedures for its formation in the same way. But the reality is not the same, especially in granting authority at both the commission. Commission Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to examine and investigate the perpetrators of violations of codes of conduct and abuse of authority in the discharge, while the National Police Commission that such authority is not given. Though the process of formation and the shape is the same party that is a Presidential Regulation. Year of establishment of the two commissions is also the same, namely in 2005, with the expenditure number sequence. National Police Commission numbered 17 in 2005 while the Commission Attorney numbered 18 in 2005. The absence of authority to inspect and conduct an investigation of police officers and the perpetrators of violations of ethics code violations authority other duties affect the effectiveness implementation of the National Police Commission. National Police Commission can not check and an investigation of the perpetrators of violations of police officers code of ethics and abuse of authority other duties. If it appears that public distrust of the recent fuss about the performance of police internal oversight in terms of stating the results of inspections and investigations against police officers perpetrators of violations of codes of conduct and abuse of authority other duties, the National Police Commission can not make a clarification of the public distrust. Conversely, if the National Police Commission has the authority to examine and investigate the results of the audit performed by the internal police oversight agency that a public fuss about this will be done a re-examination (check and recheck). The result of re-examination will yield conclusions significantly because apart from conflict of interest.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdul Hakim Garuda Nusantara, September 1985, “Politik Hukum Nasional”, Makalah, Disampaikan pada Karya Latihan Bantuan Hukum (Kalabahu) yang Diselenggarakan oleh Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia dan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Surabaya, Surabaya. Bambang Sunggono.1998. Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta. Bernard Arief Sidharta, Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2000. ---------------------- 2001. “Disiplin Hukum: tentang Hubungan antara Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum (state of the arts)”, Makalah, Disampaikan dalam Rapat Tahunan Komisi Disiplin Ilmu Hukum, 11-13 Februari, Jakarta. C.F.G. Sunaryati Hartono. 1994. Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia pada Akhir Abad Ke20, Alumni, Bandung. Darji Darmodihardjo dan Shidarta. 1995. Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta. David H. Bayley, 1976, The Nation and the Police, “Forces of Order Police Behavior ini Japan and the United State, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, University of California Press Ltd. Deddy Mulyana, 2002, metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya, Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosda Karya Bandung. Dimity Kingsford Smith, 1999, “Interpreting the Corporation Law-Purposive, Practical Reasoning and the Public Interest”, Journals of Sidney Law Review, hal. 7. H. Bohari, 1992, Pengawasan Keuangan Negara, Penerbit Rajawali Press, Jakarta. H. Ph. Visser‟t Hooft. 1988. Filosofie van de Rectswetenschap, Martinus Nijhoff. Henry Campbell Black, 1979, Black‟s Law Dictionary with pronounciations, fifth Edition, West Publishing & Co. USA. Hidayat, 1984, Sekilas Tentang Pengawasan, Majalah Keuangan, No. 125 Oktober. Imam Syaukani dan A. Ahsin Thohari. 2004. Dasar-dasar Politik Hukum, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta. Jazim Hamidi. 2005. Hermeneutika Hukum, Teori Penemuan Hukum Baru dengan Interpretasi Teks, UII Press, Yogyakarta. John M. Echols & Hassan Shadily, Kamus Inggris Indonesia, 2003, An EnglishIndonesian Dictionary, Penerbit PT Gramedia Jakarta. Jujun S. Suriasumantri. 1987. Filsafat Ilmu sebuah Pengantar Populer, Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.
J.S. Badudu dan Sutan Mohammad Zain, 2001, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta. L. Craig Parker, Jr, 1984, “Conclusion,” The Japanese Police System Today, An American Perspective, Kodansha International Ltd, Tokyo, New York, San Fransisco. Manulang, M, 2004, Dasar-dasar managemen, Penerbit Rhineka Cipta Jakarta. Marjanne Termorshuizen, Djambatan.
1999,
Kamus
Hukum,
Belanda-Indonesia,
Penerbit
Moh. Mahfud MD. 1998. Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia, Jakarta. Momo Kelana, 1972, Hukum Kepolisian (Perkembangan di Indonesia) Suatu Studi Histories Komparatif, PTIK Jakarta. ------------------ 1984, Hukum Kepolisian, Edisi Ketiga, PTIK, Jakarta. M. van Hoecke. 1984. Aard en Methode Van de Rechtswetenschap, Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, no. 3. O.C. Kaligis, 2006, Penyidik Tindak Pidana Korupsi Khusus Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi, Penerbit PT Alumni, Bandung. Oteng Sutisna, 1983, Administrasi Pendidikan Dasar Teoritis Untuk Praktek Profesional, Penerbit Angka, Bandung. Otje Salman, S, 2004., Teori Hukum, mengingat, mengumpulkan dan membuka kembali, Penerbit PT Refika Aditama. Richard H. Popkin & Avrum Stroll, 2001, Philosophy, 3rd Edition, Oxford: ButherworthHeineman. Roger Contterrell. 1992. The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. Sabar Gunawan, dkk, 2007, Kajian Kinerja Lembaga Pengawasan di Daerah, Penerbit PKP2AI-LAN. Sadjijono, 2008, Seri Hukum Kepolisian, Polri dan Good Governance, Penerbit Laksbang Mediatama, Cet. I. Satjipto Rahardjo, 1988, Polisi dan Masyarakat Indonesia, Dalam Citra Polisi, Penyunting Mochtar Lubis, Penerjemah S. Maimun, Kata Pengantar Harsja W. Bachtiar, Penerbit Yayasan Obor Indonesia. --------------------- 2008, Membangun Polisi Sipil : Perspektif Hukum, Sosial, dan Kemasyarakatan, Penerbit Buku Kompas Jakarta. Simorangkir Y.C.T, dkk, 1980, Kamus Hukum, Jakarta, Alinea Baru, Soerjono Soekanto. 1983. Pengantar Sejarah Hukum, Alumni, Bandung. ----------------------- 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.
----------------------. 1989. Perbandingan Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung. Soetandyo Wignyosoebroto, Beberapa Persoalan Paradigmatik Dalam Teori dan Konsekuensinya Atas Pilihan Metode Yang Akan Dipakai ( Metode Kuantitatif Versus Metode Kualitatif Dalam Penelitian Hukum Non-Doktrinal), Kumpulan Makalah, Tanpa Tahun, Tanpa Nama Penerbit. Sudarwan Danim. 2002. Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif, Pustaka Setia, Bandung. Sulistyowati Irianto, 2004, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Metodelogi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum”, Hukum dan Pembangunan, No. 2 Tahun XXXII. Sujamto, 1994, Aspek-aspek Pengawasan di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Cet. Ke. 2, Jakarta. Virginia S Thatcher & Alexander McQueen, 1971, The New Webster Dictionary of the English Language, International Edition, Grolier Incorporated New York, 1971, Vol. III.. Warsito Hadi Utomo, 2005, Hukum Kepolisian di Indonesia, Prestasi Pustaka Publisher. W.J.S Purwodarminto, 1986, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta. Undang-Undang Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 17 Tahun 2005 tentang Komisi Kepolisian Nasional Harian Kompas Kamis 26 Nopember 2009.
