Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 1. KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN SOSIAL EKONOMI, INTAKE ZAT GIZI DENGAN TINGGI BADAN ANAK BARU MASUK SEKOLAH (TBABS) PADA DAERAH ENDEMIS GAKI DI KECAMATAN PARBULUAN KABUPATEN DAIRI TAHUN 2008 LOKASI PENELITIAN 1. Nama Propinsi 2. Nama Kabupaten 3. Nama Kecamatan 4. Nama Desa/ kelurahan 5. Nama SD 6. Nomor SD 7. Status SD 8. Tanggal Pengukuran

: ………………………………………… : ………………………………………… : ………………………………………… : ………………………………………… : ………………………………………… : ………………………………………… : 1. Negeri 2.Swasta 3. Lain-lain : .......................

01. SOSIAL EKONOMI 1. Umur Ibu 2. Pendidikan Ibu

3.

4. 5.

6.

7.

: : a. Tamat SD b. Tamat SLTP c. Tamat SLTA d. Tamat D-3/S-1 Pekerjaan Ibu : a. PNS/POLRI b. Pegawai Swasta/Wiraswasta c. Petani/Buruh d. Ibu Rumah Tangga/ Tidak Bekerja Umur Ayah : __ Tahun Pendidikan Ayah : a. Tamat SD b. Tamat SLTP c. Tamat SLTA d. Tamat D-3/S-1 Pekerjaan Ayah : a. PNS/POLRI b. Pegawai Swasta/Wiraswasta c. Petani/Buruh d. Tidak Bekerja Pendapatan Keluarga : Rp…………………………………

Universitas Sumatera Utara

FORMULIR INTAKE ZAT GIZI INTAKE ENERGI DAN PROTEIN FORMULIR FOOD RECALL 24 JAM No. Identitas Nama Responden Alamat Dusun Kecamatan

:............................................................. :............................................................ :............................................................ :.................................................Desa :....................... :.................................................Sekolah :....................

Jam Makan Pagi

Nama Masakan

Nama Bahan Makanan

URT

Gram

Jajanan

Siang

Jajanan

Malam

Universitas Sumatera Utara

INTAKE IODIUM No Nama Bahan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Frequensi Penggunaan Cara Pengolahan Tidak < 1-3 1 kl/ 3-5 kl/ 1 ≥2 pernah 1kl/ kl/bln minggu minggu kl/ kl/hari bulan hari

Ikan air tawar (segar/kering) Ikan laut Minyak ikan Daging Susu Telur Padi-padian Buah-buahan Kacangkacangan Sayuran

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 2 HASIL UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS

VARIABEL INTAKE ZAT GIZI

Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ****** R E L I A B I L I T Y

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.

A N A L Y S I S

GOIS1 GOIS2 GOIS3 GOIS4 GOIS5 GOIS6 GOIS7 GOIS8 GOIS21 GOIS22 GTIORA4 GTIORA5

Statistics for SCALE

Mean 54.5500

Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted GOIS1 50.1500 GOIS2 50.3000 GOIS3 49.9000 GOIS4 49.9000 GOIS5 50.0500 GOIS6 49.9500 GOIS7 49.9500 GOIS8 49.9500 GOIS21 50.0500 GOIS22 50.0500 GTIORA4 50.0000 GTIORA5 49.8000 IODIUM1 22.1500 IODIUM2 22.2500 IODIUM4 22.3000 IODIUM5 22.3500 IODIUM6 22.4000 IODIUM9 22.3000 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 20.0 Alpha = .926

-

S C A L E

(A L P H A)

Mean

Std Dev

Cases

4.4000 4.2500 4.6500 4.6500 4.5000 4.6000 4.6000 4.6000 4.5000 4.5000 4.5500 4.7500

.5026 .4443 .4894 .4894 .5130 .5026 .5026 .5026 .5130 .5130 .5104 .4443

20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 N of Variables 12

Variance 19.4184

Std Dev 4.4066

Scale Variance if Item Deleted 16.4500 17.2737 15.9895 15.9895 16.4711 16.3658 16.3658 16.0500 16.4711 16.4711 16.4211 16.8000 4.7658 4.1974 4.3263 4.3447 4.4632 4.6421

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation .6661 .6273 .8150 .8267 .6446 .6885 .6885 .7737 .6446 .6446 .6616 .6648 .5852 .8764 .8081 .8138 .7738 .6365

Alpha if Item Deleted .9207 .9257 .9146 .9146 .9216 .9198 .9198 .9162 .9216 .9216 .9209 .9208 .9152 .8730 .8835 .8828 .8889 .9084

N of Items = 12

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 3 HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA TBAS

Valid

Tidak Stunted Stunted Total

Frequency 31 31 62

Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0

Valid Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0

Cumulative Percent 50.0 100.0

Frequency Table Pekerjaan Ibu

Valid

PNS Buruh/Tani Wiraswasta Ibu Rumah Tangga Total

Frequency 4 15 14 29 62

Percent 6.5 24.2 22.6 46.8 100.0

Valid Percent 6.5 24.2 22.6 46.8 100.0

Cumulative Percent 6.5 30.6 53.2 100.0

Pekerjaan Ibu

Valid

Tidak Bekerja Bekerja Total

Frequency 29 33 62

Percent 46.8 53.2 100.0

Valid Percent 46.8 53.2 100.0

Cumulative Percent 46.8 100.0

Pekerjaan Ayah

Valid

PNS Buruh/Tani Wiraswasta Tidak Bekerja Tetap Total

Frequency 10 25 9 18 62

Percent 16.1 40.3 14.5 29.0 100.0

Valid Percent 16.1 40.3 14.5 29.0 100.0

Cumulative Percent 16.1 56.5 71.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pekerjaan Ayah

Valid

Tidak Bekerja Bekerja Total

Frequency 20 42 62

Percent 32.3 67.7 100.0

Valid Percent 32.3 67.7 100.0

Cumulative Percent 32.3 100.0

Pendidikan Ayah

Valid

Tinggi Rendah Total

Frequency 36 26 62

Percent 58.1 41.9 100.0

Cumulative Percent 58.1 100.0

Valid Percent 58.1 41.9 100.0

Pendidikan Ibu

Valid

Tinggi Rendah Total

Frequency 28 34 62

Percent 45.2 54.8 100.0

Cumulative Percent 45.2 100.0

Valid Percent 45.2 54.8 100.0

Pendapatan Responden

Valid

< Rp. 761.000/bulan >= Rp. 761.000/bulan Total

Frequency 42 20 62

Percent 67.7 32.3 100.0

Valid Percent 67.7 32.3 100.0

Cumulative Percent 67.7 100.0

Konsumsi Bayam

Valid

1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 9 30 23 62

Percent 14.5 48.4 37.1 100.0

Valid Percent 14.5 48.4 37.1 100.0

Cumulative Percent 14.5 62.9 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Konsumsi Bunga Kol

Valid

1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr >=2x/hr Total

Frequency 3 17 29 8 5 62

Percent 4.8 27.4 46.8 12.9 8.1 100.0

Valid Percent 4.8 27.4 46.8 12.9 8.1 100.0

Cumulative Percent 4.8 32.3 79.0 91.9 100.0

Konsumsi Sawi Hijau

Valid

1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr >=2x/hr Total

Frequency 2 23 30 4 3 62

Percent 3.2 37.1 48.4 6.5 4.8 100.0

Valid Percent 3.2 37.1 48.4 6.5 4.8 100.0

Cumulative Percent 3.2 40.3 88.7 95.2 100.0

Konsumsi Cabe Hijau

Valid

1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 6 18 38 62

Percent 9.7 29.0 61.3 100.0

Valid Percent 9.7 29.0 61.3 100.0

Cumulative Percent 9.7 38.7 100.0

Konsumsi daun kacang panjang

Valid

1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 7 45 10 62

Percent 11.3 72.6 16.1 100.0

Valid Percent 11.3 72.6 16.1 100.0

Cumulative Percent 11.3 83.9 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Konsumsi Jengkol

Valid

1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 18 35 9 62

Percent 29.0 56.5 14.5 100.0

Valid Percent 29.0 56.5 14.5 100.0

Cumulative Percent 29.0 85.5 100.0

Konsumsi Petai Missing

System

Frequency 62

Percent 100.0

Konsumsi Daun Singkong

Valid

1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr >=2x/hr Total

Frequency 2 6 28 24 2 62

Percent 3.2 9.7 45.2 38.7 3.2 100.0

Valid Percent 3.2 9.7 45.2 38.7 3.2 100.0

Cumulative Percent 3.2 12.9 58.1 96.8 100.0

Konsumsi Kubis

Valid

<1 x/bln 1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr >=2x/hr Total

Frequency 2 9 21 21 8 1 62

Percent 3.2 14.5 33.9 33.9 12.9 1.6 100.0

Valid Percent 3.2 14.5 33.9 33.9 12.9 1.6 100.0

Cumulative Percent 3.2 17.7 51.6 85.5 98.4 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Konsumsi Singkong

Valid

1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr >=2x/hr Total

Frequency 4 17 29 11 1 62

Percent 6.5 27.4 46.8 17.7 1.6 100.0

Valid Percent 6.5 27.4 46.8 17.7 1.6 100.0

Cumulative Percent 6.5 33.9 80.6 98.4 100.0

Konsumsi Bawang Putih

Valid

1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 20 27 15 62

Percent 32.3 43.5 24.2 100.0

Valid Percent 32.3 43.5 24.2 100.0

Cumulative Percent 32.3 75.8 100.0

Konsumsi Bawang Merah

Valid

1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 1 3 25 33 62

Percent 1.6 4.8 40.3 53.2 100.0

Valid Percent 1.6 4.8 40.3 53.2 100.0

Cumulative Percent 1.6 6.5 46.8 100.0

Konsumsi Ikan Tawar

Valid

<1 x/bln 1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 9 25 9 8 11 62

Percent 14.5 40.3 14.5 12.9 17.7 100.0

Valid Percent 14.5 40.3 14.5 12.9 17.7 100.0

Cumulative Percent 14.5 54.8 69.4 82.3 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Konsumsi Ikan Laut

Valid

1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 1 20 29 12 62

Percent 1.6 32.3 46.8 19.4 100.0

Valid Percent 1.6 32.3 46.8 19.4 100.0

Cumulative Percent 1.6 33.9 80.6 100.0

Konsumsi Daging

Valid

<1 x/bln 1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 3 39 13 4 3 62

Percent 4.8 62.9 21.0 6.5 4.8 100.0

Valid Percent 4.8 62.9 21.0 6.5 4.8 100.0

Cumulative Percent 4.8 67.7 88.7 95.2 100.0

Konsumsi Susu

Valid

<1 x/bln 1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 3 35 6 9 9 62

Percent 4.8 56.5 9.7 14.5 14.5 100.0

Valid Percent 4.8 56.5 9.7 14.5 14.5 100.0

Cumulative Percent 4.8 61.3 71.0 85.5 100.0

Konsumsi Telur

Valid

1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr Total

Frequency 9 36 8 9 62

Percent 14.5 58.1 12.9 14.5 100.0

Valid Percent 14.5 58.1 12.9 14.5 100.0

Cumulative Percent 14.5 72.6 85.5 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Konsumsi Kacang-Kacangan

Valid

<1 x/bln 1-3 x/bln 1 x/mgg 3-5x/mgg 1x/hr >=2x/hr Total

Frequency 6 16 8 14 17 1 62

Percent 9.7 25.8 12.9 22.6 27.4 1.6 100.0

Valid Percent 9.7 25.8 12.9 22.6 27.4 1.6 100.0

Cumulative Percent 9.7 35.5 48.4 71.0 98.4 100.0

intake gizi (protein)

Valid

Frequency 24 38 62

Baik (=45 gram) Kurang (<45 gram Total

Percent 38.7 61.3 100.0

Cumulative Percent 38.7 100.0

Valid Percent 38.7 61.3 100.0

intake gzi (energy)

Valid

Baik (>=1.900 kkal) Kurang (<1.900 kkal) Total

Frequency 18 44 62

Percent 29.0 71.0 100.0

Valid Percent 29.0 71.0 100.0

Cumulative Percent 29.0 100.0

Intake yodium

Valid

100-120 ugram <100 ugram Total

Frequency 22 40 62

Percent 35.5 64.5 100.0

Valid Percent 35.5 64.5 100.0

Cumulative Percent 35.5 100.0

Crosstabs intake gizi (protein) * TBAS

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab

intake gizi (protein)

Baik (=45 gram)

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 17 7 27.4% 11.3% 14 24 22.6% 38.7% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Kurang (<45 gram Total

Total 24 38.7% 38 61.3% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 6.798b 5.507 6.959

df 1 1 1

6.689

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .009 .019 .008

1

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.018

.009

.010

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.00. Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for intake gizi (protein) (Baik (=45 gram) / Kurang (<45 gram) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

4.163

1.386

12.503

1.923

1.179

3.135

.462

.237

.902

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

intake gzi (energy) * TBAS Crosstab

intake gzi (energy)

Baik (>=1.900 kkal) Kurang (<1.900 kkal)

Total

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 14 4 22.6% 6.5% 17 27 27.4% 43.5% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Total 18 29.0% 44 71.0% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 7.828b 6.341 8.177

7.702

df 1 1 1

1

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .005 .012 .004

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.011

.005

.006

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.00.

Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for intake gzi (energy) (Baik (>=1.900 kkal) / Kurang (<1.900 kkal)) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

5.559

1.567

19.717

2.013

1.288

3.147

.362

.148

.887

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Intake yodium * TBAS Crosstab

Intake yodium

100-120 ugram <100 ugram

Total

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 16 6 25.8% 9.7% 15 25 24.2% 40.3% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Total 22 35.5% 40 64.5% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 7.045b 5.707 7.243

6.932

df 1 1 1

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .008 .017 .007

1

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.016

.008

.008

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.00. Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Intake yodium (100-120 ugram / <100 ugram) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

4.444

1.427

13.839

1.939

1.206

3.118

.436

.212

.899

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pekerjaan Ibu * TBAS Crosstab

Pekerjaan Ibu

Tidak Bekerja Bekerja

Total

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 17 12 27.4% 19.4% 14 19 22.6% 30.6% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Total 29 46.8% 33 53.2% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 5.429b 4.290 5.525

5.342

df 1 1 1

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .020 .038 .019

1

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.037

.019

.021

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.50. Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan Ibu (Tidak Bekerja / Bekerja) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

1.923

.699

5.285

1.382

.837

2.282

.719

.426

1.212

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pekerjaan Ayah * TBAS Crosstab

Pekerjaan Ayah

Tidak Bekerja Bekerja

Total

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 15 5 24.2% 8.1% 16 26 25.8% 41.9% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Total 20 32.3% 42 67.7% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 7.381b 5.979 7.636

7.262

df 1 1 1

1

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .007 .014 .006

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.013

.007

.007

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.00. Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan Ayah (Tidak Bekerja / Bekerja) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

4.875

1.485

15.998

1.969

1.241

3.122

.404

.182

.895

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pendidikan Ayah * TBAS Crosstab

Pendidikan Ayah

Tinggi Rendah

Total

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 16 20 25.8% 32.3% 15 11 24.2% 17.7% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Total 36 58.1% 26 41.9% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 1.060b .596 1.063

df 1 1 1

1.043

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .303 .440 .302

1

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.440

.220

.307

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.00. Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Pendidikan Ayah (Tinggi / Rendah) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

.587

.212

1.625

.770

.471

1.260

1.313

.769

2.243

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pendidikan Ibu * TBAS Crosstab

Pendidikan Ibu

Tinggi Rendah

Total

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 19 9 30.6% 14.5% 12 22 19.4% 35.5% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Total 28 45.2% 34 54.8% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 6.513b 5.275 6.637

df 1 1 1

6.408

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .011 .022 .010

1

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.021

.010

.011

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.00. Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Pendidikan Ibu (Tinggi / Rendah) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

3.870

1.341

11.172

1.923

1.141

3.239

.497

.275

.899

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pendapatan Responden * TBAS Crosstab

Pendapatan Responden

< Rp. 761.000/bulan >= Rp. 761.000/bulan

Total

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 19 23 30.6% 37.1% 12 8 19.4% 12.9% 31 31 50.0% 50.0%

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Total 42 67.7% 20 32.3% 62 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 1.181b .664 1.187

df 1 1 1

1.162

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .277 .415 .276

1

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

.416

.208

.281

62

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.00.

Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Pendapatan Responden (< Rp. 761.000/bulan / >= Rp. 761.000/bulan) For cohort TBAS = Tidak Stunted For cohort TBAS = Stunted N of Valid Cases

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

.551

.187

1.624

.754

.463

1.229

1.369

.749

2.502

62

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary Unweighted Cases Selected Cases

a

N Included in Analysis Missing Cases Total

Unselected Cases Total

62 0 62 0 62

Percent 100.0 .0 100.0 .0 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Tidak Stunted Stunted

Internal Value 0 1

Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table

a,b

Predicted

Step 0

Observed TBAS

Tidak Stunted Stunted

TBAS Tidak Stunted 0 0

Stunted 31 31

Overall Percentage

Percentage Correct .0 100.0 50.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

Step 0

Constant

B .000

S.E. .254

Wald .000

df 1

Sig. 1.000

1 1 1 1 1 1 6

Sig. .203 .820 .010 .009 .005 .008 .005

Exp(B) 1.000

Variables not in the Equation Step 0

Variables

Overall Statistics

KRJA_IBU DIDK.AYH DIDK.IBU PROTEIN ENERGI YODIUM

Score 1.620 .051 6.665 6.798 7.828 7.045 18.459

df

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Variables in the Equation

Step a 1

B .527 1.704 .677 1.574 2.491 .485 -5.122

KRJA_IBU KERJ.AYH DDIK.IBU PROTEIN IODIUM ENERGY Constant

S.E. .674 .760 .719 .742 1.026 .793 1.420

Wald .612 5.031 .886 4.498 5.894 .375 13.014

df 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Sig. .434 .025 .347 .034 .015 .541 .000

Exp(B) 1.694 5.494 1.969 4.825 12.069 1.624 .006

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) Lower Upper .452 6.349 1.240 24.348 .481 8.064 1.127 20.663 1.616 90.144 .344 7.681

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: KRJA_IBU, KERJ.AYH, DDIK.IBU, PROTEIN, IODIUM, ENERGY.

Block 1: Method = Forward Stepwise (Conditional) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Step 1

Step 2

Step Block Model Step Block Model

Chi-square 8.177 8.177 8.177 7.979 16.155 16.155

df 1 1 1 1 2 2

Sig. .004 .004 .004 .005 .000 .000

Model Summary Step 1 2

-2 Log likelihood 77.774 69.795

Cox & Snell R Square .124 .229

Nagelkerke R Square .165 .306

Classification Tablea Predicted

Step 1

Observed TBAS

Step 2

Overall Percentage TBAS Overall Percentage

Tidak Stunted Stunted Tidak Stunted Stunted

TBAS Tidak Stunted Stunted 14 17 4 27 25 10

6 21

Percentage Correct 45.2 87.1 66.1 80.6 67.7 74.2

a. The cut value is .500

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Variables in the Equation

Step a 1 Step b 2

IODIUM Constant PROTEIN IODIUM Constant

B 1.715 -1.253 1.655 1.948

S.E. .646 .567 .617 .698

Wald 7.052 4.883 7.196 7.786

-2.443

.777

9.878

df 1 1 1 1

Sig. .008 .027 .007 .005

Exp(B) 5.559 .286 5.235 7.016

1

.002

.087

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) Lower Upper 1.567 19.717 1.562 1.786

17.545 27.564

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: IODIUM. b. Variable(s) entered on step 2: PROTEIN.

Model if Term Removeda

Variable Step 1 ENERGI Step 2 PROTEIN ENERGI

Model Log Likelihood -43.012 -38.944

Change in -2 Log Likelihood 8.249 8.092

-39.570

9.345

1 1

Sig. of the Change .004 .004

1

.002

df

a. Based on conditional parameter estimates

Variables not in the Equation Step 1

Step 2

Variables

Overall Statistics Variables

Overall Statistics

KRJA_IBU DIDK.AYH DIDK.IBU PROTEIN YODIUM KRJA_IBU DIDK.AYH DIDK.IBU YODIUM

Score 1.064 .235 4.743 7.743 1.953 12.405 1.059 .474 2.092 1.272 4.976

df 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 4

Sig. .302 .628 .029 .005 .162 .030 .303 .491 .148 .259 .290

Universitas Sumatera Utara