87
Lampiran 2 KUESIONER PENGARUH DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP AKSEPTABILITAS DAN PEMANFAATAN PUSAT INFORMASI KONSELING REMAJA (PIK REMAJA) PADA SISWA SMU NEGRI 2 KOTA TANJUNG BALAI TAHUN 2015 I.
KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN 1. Usia
:
2. Jenis Kelamin
:
3. Apakah anda memiliki teman sekelompok :
YA
TIDAK
II. DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda NO ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK 1. Seluruh teman dalam kelompok saya memiliki jenis kelamin yang sama dengan saya 2. Saya dan teman kelompok memiliki hobi yang sama 3. Saya berbagi cerita, informasi dan pengalaman pribadi dengan teman kelompok saya 4. Saya selalu meluangkan waktu untuk teman kelompok saya 5. Teman kelompok tidak pernah memanfaatkan layanan konseling remaja di sekolah 6. Semua anggota di kelompok teman saya sudah memiliki pacar 7. Memiliki kelompok teman sebaya merupakan hal yang membanggakan bagi saya 8. Saya lebih senang mendengarkan nasihat teman kelompok bila dibandingkan dengan guru dan orang tua 9. Perilaku saya dipengaruhi oleh teman kelompok 10. Semakin banyak teman semakin besar pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku saya 11. Guru di sekolah sangat baik terhadap saya 12. Setiap selesai memberikan pelajaran, guru selalu
1. 2.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
88
13. 14. 15.
16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
meyarankan kami agar mengikuti kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh PIK remaja Guru ikut mendukung kegiatan yang dibuat oleh konselor di PIK remaja Guru ikut membantu untuk mengkoordinir siswa setiap mengikuti kegiatan sosialisasi PIK remaja Guru selalu dilibatkan oleh pihak sekolah dalam membantu siswa untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang kesehatan reproduksi Sebaiknya guru yang menjadi konselor di sekolah semua guru selalu mendukung kegiatan PIK remaja Saya dekat dengan semua guru Ada seorang guru yang menjadi tempat curhat saya saya lebih senang curhat dengan guru atau dengan konselor dari PIK remaja
III. AKSEPTABILITAS TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH 1. Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda. NO ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK 1. Ruangan layanan PIK remaja disekolah seharusnya tertutup agar tidak diketahui orang lain. 2. Ruangan layanan PIK REMAJA disekolah sebaiknya ditata dengan bersih dan nyaman 3. Ruangan untuk konsultasi sebaiknya dibuat tersendiri agar tidak didengar orang lain. 4. Pemberi pelayanan konsultasi sebaiknya teman sebaya (peer group) 5. Saya merasa malu untuk datang ke PIK REMAJA 6. Saya merasa takut menjadi bahan ejekan teman atau orang lain yang saya kenal, apabila saya meminta pelayanan kesehatan reproduksi di sekolah 7. Saya lebih senang jika petugas pemberi layanan berjenis kelamin sama dengan saya 8. Petugas pemberi layanan sebaiknya seorang guru 9. Petugas sebaiknya mendengarkan dengan penuh perhatian saat saya menyampaikan masalah yang saya hadapi. 10. Waktu dalam konsultasi sebaiknya tidak dibatasi
Universitas Sumatera Utara
89
IV.
PEMANFAATAN TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH
1.
Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar
2.
Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda.
NO 1. 2. 3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8. 9.
10.
ITEM PERTANYAAN Apakah anda mengetahui bahwa di sekolah anda memiliki PIK REMAJA? Pernahkah anda berkunjung dan berkonsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA? Apakah anda membutuhkan pelayanan konseling kesehatan reproduksi? Apakah keberadaan PIK REMAJA di sekolah dapat membantu siswa dalam memberikan informasi kesehatan reproduksi? Apakah pelayanan yang anda terima dari petugas PIK REMAJA sudah baik? Apakah semua materi tentang kesehatan reproduksi yang siswa butuhkan dapat diberikan oleh petugas PIK REMAJA? Apakah terdapat masalah pada saat anda melakukan konsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA? Apakah tempat melakukan konseling nyaman? Apakah PIK REMAJA juga memberikan informas itentang kesehatan reproduksi melalui media cetak (brosur, leaflet, booklet, buku – buku bacaan)? Apakah PIK REMAJA memberikan informasi juga melalui diskusi kelompok (peer group)?
YA
TIDAK
Universitas Sumatera Utara
90
Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Reliability Dukungan Guru Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid
% 30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
Excludeda Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.891
10
Item Statistics Mean
Std. Deviation
N
g1
.77
.430
30
g2
.80
.407
30
g3
.77
.430
30
g4
.70
.466
30
g5
.70
.466
30
g6
.70
.466
30
g7
.77
.430
30
g8
.83
.379
30
g9
.67
.479
30
g10
.70
.466
30
Universitas Sumatera Utara
91
Item-Total Statistics Corrected Item- Cronbach's Scale Mean if Scale Variance Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted g1
6.63
8.171
.629
.880
g2
6.60
8.662
.449
.892
g3
6.63
8.171
.629
.880
g4
6.70
7.941
.664
.878
g5
6.70
7.941
.664
.878
g6
6.70
8.010
.635
.880
g7
6.63
8.171
.629
.880
g8
6.57
8.323
.657
.879
g9
6.73
7.582
.792
.868
g10
6.70
8.217
.550
.886
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
7.40
9.903
3.147
10
Reliability Dukungan Teman Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid Excludeda Total
% 30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
92
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.843
10
Item Statistics Mean
Std. Deviation
N
t1
.73
.450
30
t2
.37
.490
30
t3
.33
.479
30
t4
.07
.254
30
t5
.20
.407
30
t6
.27
.450
30
t7
.53
.507
30
t8
.43
.504
30
t9
.40
.498
30
t10
.40
.498
30
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
t1
3.00
7.172
.573
.825
t2
3.37
7.137
.526
.830
t3
3.40
6.731
.721
.810
t4
3.67
8.092
.414
.840
t5
3.53
7.499
.489
.833
t6
3.47
7.430
.458
.836
t7
3.20
6.648
.706
.811
t8
3.30
7.252
.460
.837
t9
3.33
7.126
.518
.831
t10
3.33
7.057
.547
.828
Universitas Sumatera Utara
93
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
3.73
8.754
2.959
10
Reliability Akseptabilitas Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
%
Valid Excludeda Total
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.817
10
Item Statistics Mean a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10
.27 .33 .10 .30 .10 .23 .27 .23 .30 .40
Std. Deviation .450 .479 .305 .466 .305 .430 .450 .430 .466 .498
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Universitas Sumatera Utara
94
Item-Total Statistics Corrected Item- Cronbach's Scale Mean if Scale Variance Total Alpha if Item Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted a1
2.27
5.720
.541
.796
a2
2.20
5.407
.650
.783
a3
2.43
6.323
.436
.808
a4
2.23
5.702
.524
.798
a5
2.43
6.323
.436
.808
a6
2.30
5.734
.566
.794
a7
2.27
5.995
.403
.811
a8
2.30
5.872
.493
.802
a9
2.23
5.633
.558
.794
a10
2.13
5.844
.412
.812
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
2.53
7.085
2.662
10
Reliability Pemanfaatan Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid Excludeda Total
% 30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
95
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.863
10
Item Statistics Mean
Std. Deviation
N
p1
.50
.509
30
p2
.33
.479
30
p3
.77
.430
30
p4
.43
.504
30
p5
.43
.504
30
p6
.13
.346
30
p7
.10
.305
30
p8
.07
.254
30
p9
.10
.305
30
p10
.07
.254
30
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
p1
2.43
5.840
.463
.864
p2
2.60
5.766
.539
.855
p3
2.17
6.075
.461
.860
p4
2.50
5.362
.694
.839
p5
2.50
5.431
.661
.843
p6
2.80
5.890
.732
.839
p7
2.83
6.213
.612
.849
p8
2.87
6.464
.549
.855
p9
2.83
6.075
.711
.843
p10
2.87
6.395
.606
.852
Universitas Sumatera Utara
96
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
2.93
7.237
2.690
10
Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat Karakteristik Responden usia Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
16
65
33.5
33.5
33.5
17
121
62.4
62.4
95.9
18
8
4.1
4.1
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
sex Frequency Valid
Laki-laki
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
72
37.1
37.1
37.1
Perempuan
122
62.9
62.9
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
T_kelompok Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
76
39.2
39.2
39.2
Ya
118
60.8
60.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
97
Dukungan Guru Frequency Table g1 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
119
61.3
61.3
61.3
75
38.7
38.7
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
g2 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
78
40.2
40.2
40.2
Ya
116
59.8
59.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g3 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
127
65.5
65.5
65.5
67
34.5
34.5
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
g4 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
87
44.8
44.8
44.8
Ya
107
55.2
55.2
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
98
g5 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
111
57.2
57.2
57.2
83
42.8
42.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
g6 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
74
38.1
38.1
38.1
Ya
120
61.9
61.9
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g7 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
67
34.5
34.5
34.5
Ya
127
65.5
65.5
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g8 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
86
44.3
44.3
44.3
Ya
108
55.7
55.7
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
99
g9 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
80
41.2
41.2
41.2
Ya
114
58.8
58.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g10 Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak
95
49.0
49.0
49.0
Ya
99
51.0
51.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
Kat_guru Frequency Valid
Kurang
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
106
54.6
54.6
54.6
Baik
88
45.4
45.4
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Dukungan Teman Frequency Table t1 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
61
31.4
31.4
31.4
Ya
133
68.6
68.6
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
100
t2 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
110
56.7
56.7
56.7
84
43.3
43.3
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
t3 Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak
97
50.0
50.0
50.0
Ya
97
50.0
50.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
t4 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
118
60.8
60.8
60.8
76
39.2
39.2
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
t5 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
101
52.1
52.1
52.1
93
47.9
47.9
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
101
t6 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
126
64.9
64.9
64.9
68
35.1
35.1
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
t7 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
114
58.8
58.8
58.8
80
41.2
41.2
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
t8 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
123
63.4
63.4
63.4
71
36.6
36.6
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
t9 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
128
66.0
66.0
66.0
66
34.0
34.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
102
t10 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
132
68.0
68.0
68.0
62
32.0
32.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Kat_teman Frequency Valid
Kurang
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
133
68.6
68.6
68.6
Baik
61
31.4
31.4
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Akseptabilitas Frequency Table a1 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
49
25.3
25.3
25.3
Ya
145
74.7
74.7
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a2 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
109
56.2
56.2
56.2
85
43.8
43.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
103
a3 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
48
24.7
24.7
24.7
Ya
146
75.3
75.3
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a4 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
92
47.4
47.4
47.4
Ya
102
52.6
52.6
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a5 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
88
45.4
45.4
45.4
Ya
106
54.6
54.6
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a6 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
129
66.5
66.5
66.5
65
33.5
33.5
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
104
a7 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
141
72.7
72.7
72.7
53
27.3
27.3
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
a8 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
142
73.2
73.2
73.2
52
26.8
26.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
a9 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
145
74.7
74.7
74.7
49
25.3
25.3
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
a10 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
146
75.3
75.3
75.3
48
24.7
24.7
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
105
akseptabilitas Frequency Valid
Tidak menerima Menerima Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
132
68.0
68.0
68.0
62
32.0
32.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Pemanfaatan Frequency Table p1 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
81
41.8
41.8
41.8
Ya
113
58.2
58.2
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p2 Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak
98
50.5
50.5
50.5
Ya
96
49.5
49.5
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
p3 Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak
95
49.0
49.0
49.0
Ya
99
51.0
51.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
106
p4 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
93
47.9
47.9
47.9
Ya
101
52.1
52.1
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p5 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
80
41.2
41.2
41.2
Ya
114
58.8
58.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p6 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
109
56.2
56.2
56.2
85
43.8
43.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
p7 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
100
51.5
51.5
51.5
94
48.5
48.5
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
107
p8 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
84
43.3
43.3
43.3
Ya
110
56.7
56.7
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p9 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
104
53.6
53.6
53.6
90
46.4
46.4
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
p10
Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
87
44.8
44.8
44.8
Ya
107
55.2
55.2
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
pemanfaatan Frequency Valid
Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
104
53.6
53.6
53.6
90
46.4
46.4
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
108
Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat Crosstabs Kat_teman * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Kat_teman
Kurang
Baik
Count
Total
91
42
133
% within Kat_teman
68.4%
31.6%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
68.9%
67.7%
68.6%
% of Total
46.9%
21.6%
68.6%
41
20
61
% within Kat_teman
67.2%
32.8%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
31.1%
32.3%
31.4%
% of Total
21.1%
10.3%
31.4%
132
62
194
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
Count
Total
Menerima
Count % within Kat_teman % within akseptabilitas % of Total Chi-Square Tests Value
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio
df a
1
.867
.000
1
.999
.028
1
.867
.028 b
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. sided) sided) (1-sided)
Fisher's Exact Test
.870
Linear-by-Linear Association
.028
N of Valid Casesb
194
1
.496
.867
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
109
Kat_guru * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Kat_guru
Kurang
Count
Baik
Total
82
24
106
% within Kat_guru
77.4%
22.6%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
62.1%
38.7%
54.6%
% of Total
42.3%
12.4%
54.6%
50
38
88
% within Kat_guru
56.8%
43.2%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
37.9%
61.3%
45.4%
% of Total
25.8%
19.6%
45.4%
132
62
194
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
Count
Total
Menerima
Count % within Kat_guru % within akseptabilitas % of Total
Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio
b
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. sided) sided) (1-sided)
df
9.329a
1
.002
8.408
1
.004
9.352
1
.002
Fisher's Exact Test
.003
Linear-by-Linear Association
9.281
N of Valid Casesb
194
1
.002
.002
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,12. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
110
Kat_teman * pemanfaatan Crosstab pemanfaatan Tidak memanfaatkan Kat_teman
Kurang
Baik
Count
Total
78
55
133
% within Kat_teman
58.6%
41.4%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
75.0%
61.1%
68.6%
% of Total
40.2%
28.4%
68.6%
26
35
61
% within Kat_teman
42.6%
57.4%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
25.0%
38.9%
31.4%
% of Total
13.4%
18.0%
31.4%
104
90
194
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
Count
Total
Memanfaatkan
Count % within Kat_teman % within pemanfaatan % of Total
Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio
df a
1
.038
3.697
1
.055
4.319
1
.038
4.317 b
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1(2-sided) sided) sided)
Fisher's Exact Test
.044
Linear-by-Linear Association
4.295
N of Valid Casesb
194
1
.027
.038
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,30. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
111
Kat_guru * pemanfaatan Crosstab pemanfaatan Tidak memanfaatkan Kat_guru
Kurang
Count
Baik
Total
54
52
106
% within Kat_guru
50.9%
49.1%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
51.9%
57.8%
54.6%
% of Total
27.8%
26.8%
54.6%
50
38
88
% within Kat_guru
56.8%
43.2%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
48.1%
42.2%
45.4%
% of Total
25.8%
19.6%
45.4%
104
90
194
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
Count
Total
Memanfaatkan
Count % within Kat_guru % within pemanfaatan % of Total
Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio
df a
1
.414
.452
1
.501
.668
1
.414
.667 b
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. (1(2-sided) (2-sided) sided)
Fisher's Exact Test
.470
Linear-by-Linear Association
.664
N of Valid Casesb
194
1
.251
.415
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40,82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
112
Correlations Correlations gtot gtot
Pearson Correlation
ttot 1
Sig. (2-tailed) ttot
atot
ptot
atot
ptot
.060
.299**
-.007
.407
.000
.922
N
194
194
194
194
Pearson Correlation
.060
1
-.037
.335**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.407
.609
.000
N
194
194
194
194
**
-.037
1
-.029
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.609
N
194
194
194
194
-.007
**
-.029
1
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
.299
.335
.688
Sig. (2-tailed)
.922
.000
.688
N
194
194
194
194
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Universitas Sumatera Utara
113
Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat Uji Normalitas Data NPar Tests One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test ttot N Normal Parametersa
atot
ptot
194
194
194
194
4.23
5.23
4.39
5.22
2.508
2.238
2.348
2.934
Absolute
.086
.088
.089
.092
Positive
.086
.088
.086
.081
Negative
-.075
-.088
-.089
-.092
1.196
1.224
1.243
1.279
.114
.100
.091
.076
Mean Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
gtot
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Test distribution is Normal.
Multivariat Regression Variables Entered/Removedb Model 1
Variables Entered
Variables Removed
ttot, gtota
Method . Enter
a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: atot Model Summary Model 1
R .304a
R Square .093
Adjusted R Square .083
Std. Error of the Estimate 2.248
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot
Universitas Sumatera Utara
114
ANOVAb Model 1
Sum of Squares Regression
Mean Square
98.579
2
49.289
965.427
191
5.055
1064.005
193
Residual Total
df
F
Sig. .000a
9.751
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot b. Dependent Variable: atot Coefficientsa Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B (Constant)
Std. Error
Standardized Coefficients Beta
2.943
.482
gtot
.318
.072
ttot
-.052
.065
t
Sig.
6.110
.000
.303
4.384
.000
-.055
-.798
.426
a. Dependent Variable: atot Regression Variables Entered/Removedb Model 1
Variables Entered
Variables Removed
ttot, gtota
Method . Enter
a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: ptot Model Summary Model 1
R .336a
R Square .113
Adjusted R Square .104
Std. Error of the Estimate 2.777
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot
Universitas Sumatera Utara
115
ANOVAb Model 1
Sum of Squares Regression
df
Mean Square
188.055
2
94.027
Residual
1473.414
191
7.714
Total
1661.469
193
F
Sig.
12.189
.000a
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot b. Dependent Variable: ptot Coefficientsa Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B
Std. Error
(Constant)
3.742
.595
gtot
-.036
.089
ttot
.394
.080
Standardized Coefficients Beta
t
Sig.
6.289
.000
-.027
-.399
.690
.337
4.936
.000
a. Dependent Variable: ptot
Universitas Sumatera Utara
116
Lampiran 7 : Kanonik Manova - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design s. A n a l y s i s 178 0 16 1 1
o f
V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
cases accepted. cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. cases rejected because of missing data. non-empty cell. design will be processed.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal atot atot ptot
ptot
2,26647 -,00373
2,86264
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations Log(Determinant) Bartlett test of sphericity Significance
= = =
-,00001 ,00242 with 1 D. F. ,961
F(max) criterion
=
1,59527 with (2;175) D. F.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances atot atot ptot
5,13687 -,02421
ptot
8,19468
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot ptot
atot
ptot
898,95265 -4,23707
1434,06901
Universitas Sumatera Utara
117
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A n a l y s i s
o f
V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * *
EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot atot ptot
ptot
28,03611 -19,11125
66,13324
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 86 ) Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Pillais ,07371 3,34842 4,00 Hotellings ,07718 3,33798 4,00 Wilks ,92736 3,34328 4,00 Roys ,05381 Note.. F statistic for WILKS' Lambda is exact.
Error DF 350,00 346,00 348,00
Sig. of F ,010 ,011 ,011
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. 1 2
Eigenvalue
Pct.
,05687 ,02031
Cum. Pct.
73,68685 26,31315
Canon Cor.
73,68685 100,00000
Sq. Cor
,23197 ,14108
,05381 ,01990
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dimension Reduction Analysis Roots 1 TO 2 2 TO 2
Wilks L. ,92736 ,98010
F
Hypoth. DF
3,34328 3,55393
4,00 1,00
Error DF
Sig. of F
348,00 175,00
,011 ,061
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (2;175) D. F. Variable
Sq. Mul. R
Adj. Rsq.
atot ptot
,03024 ,04408
,01916 ,03316
Hypoth. MS 14,01806 33,06662
Error MS 5,13687 8,19468
F 2,72891 4,03513
Sig. of F ,068 ,019
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Universitas Sumatera Utara
118
Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable atot ptot
1
2
-,23410 ,28642
,36907 ,18972
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable atot ptot
1
2
-,53573 ,83385
,84462 ,55235
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Function No. Variable atot ptot
1
2
-,55224 ,84446
,83369 ,53562
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. 1 2
Pct Var DEP 50,90371 49,09629
Cum Pct DEP
Pct Var COV
50,90371 100,00000
2,73915 ,97721
Cum Pct COV 2,73915 3,71636
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES Function No. COVARIATE gtot ttot
1
2
-,14889 ,40973
,43896 ,16271
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR. COVARIATE gtot
1
2
-,32162
,94824
Universitas Sumatera Utara
119
ttot
,93061
,36957
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables CAN. VAR. Covariate
2
-,36909 ,94701
,92939 ,32121
gtot ttot
1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR.
Pct Var DEP
1 2
Cum Pct DEP
2,77945 ,96230
Pct Var COV
2,77945 3,74175
Cum Pct COV
51,65262 48,34738
51,65262 100,00000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable .. atot COVARIATE
Std. Err.
t-Value
gtot 1618031416 ,1527312558 ttot -,0763193958 -,0757455506 Dependent variable .. ptot
,07897 ,07510
COVARIATE gtot ttot
B
B
Beta
Beta
,0116611736 ,2694603936
Std. Err. ,0086525788 ,2102226336
t-Value ,09974 ,09486
Sig. of t 2,04904 -1,01620
Lower -95% ,042 ,311
,00596 ,31765 -,22454 ,07190
Sig. of t ower -95% ,11692 2,84068
,907 ,005
CL-Upper
CL- Upper
-,18518 ,08225
,20850 ,45667
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A n a l y s i s
o f
V a r i a n c e Design
1
* * * * * * * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONSTANT Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot atot ptot
234,56343 239,67718
ptot
244,90242
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 0, N = 86 )
Universitas Sumatera Utara
120
Test Name
Value
Exact F
Hypoth. DF
Error DF
2,00 2,00 2,00
174,00 174,00 174,00
,30230 37,69586 Pillais Hotellings ,43329 37,69586 ,69770 37,69586 Wilks Roys ,30230 Note.. F statistics are exact.
Sig. of F ,000 ,000 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No.
Eigenvalue
1
Pct.
,43329
100,00000
Cum. Pct.
Canon Cor.
100,00000
,54982
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (1;175) D. F. Variable
Hypoth. SS
Error SS
Hypoth. MS
atot ptot
234,56343 244,90242
898,95265 1434,06901
234,56343 244,90242
Error MS 5,13687 8,19468
F 45,66269 29,88554
Sig. of F ,000 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable atot ptot
1 ,34343 ,22032
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable atot ptot
1 ,77838 ,63071
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Estimates of effects for canonical variables Canonical Variable Parameter
1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
121
1
2,18056
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Canonical Variable Variable atot ptot
1 ,77602 ,62780
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Universitas Sumatera Utara
122
Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Reliability Dukungan Guru Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
%
Valid Excluded
a
Total
30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.891
10 Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
g1
.77
.430
30
g2
.80
.407
30
g3
.77
.430
30
g4
.70
.466
30
g5
.70
.466
30
g6
.70
.466
30
g7
.77
.430
30
g8
.83
.379
30
g9
.67
.479
30
g10
.70
.466
30
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if Correlation Item Deleted
g1
6.63
8.171
.629
.880
g2
6.60
8.662
.449
.892
g3
6.63
8.171
.629
.880
g4
6.70
7.941
.664
.878
g5
6.70
7.941
.664
.878
g6
6.70
8.010
.635
.880
Universitas Sumatera Utara
123
g7
6.63
8.171
.629
.880
g8
6.57
8.323
.657
.879
g9
6.73
7.582
.792
.868
g10
6.70
8.217
.550
.886
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance 7.40
Std. Deviation
9.903
N of Items
3.147
10
Reliability Dukungan Teman Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid Excluded
a
Total
% 30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.843
10
Item Statistics Mean
Std. Deviation
N
t1
.73
.450
30
t2
.37
.490
30
t3
.33
.479
30
t4
.07
.254
30
t5
.20
.407
30
t6
.27
.450
30
t7
.53
.507
30
t8
.43
.504
30
t9
.40
.498
30
t10
.40
.498
30
Universitas Sumatera Utara
124
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if Correlation Item Deleted
t1
3.00
7.172
.573
.825
t2
3.37
7.137
.526
.830
t3
3.40
6.731
.721
.810
t4
3.67
8.092
.414
.840
t5
3.53
7.499
.489
.833
t6
3.47
7.430
.458
.836
t7
3.20
6.648
.706
.811
t8
3.30
7.252
.460
.837
t9
3.33
7.126
.518
.831
t10
3.33
7.057
.547
.828
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance 3.73
Std. Deviation
8.754
N of Items
2.959
10
Reliability Akseptabilitas Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid Excludeda Total
% 30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .817
N of Items 10
Universitas Sumatera Utara
125
Item Statistics Mean a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10
Std. Deviation .27 .33 .10 .30 .10 .23 .27 .23 .30 .40
N
.450 .479 .305 .466 .305 .430 .450 .430 .466 .498
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
2.27 2.20 2.43 2.23 2.43 2.30 2.27 2.30 2.23 2.13
Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if Correlation Item Deleted
5.720 5.407 6.323 5.702 6.323 5.734 5.995 5.872 5.633 5.844
.541 .650 .436 .524 .436 .566 .403 .493 .558 .412
.796 .783 .808 .798 .808 .794 .811 .802 .794 .812
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance 2.53
Std. Deviation
7.085
N of Items
2.662
10
Reliability Pemanfaatan Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid Excludeda Total
% 30
100.0
0
.0
30
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
126
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.863
10 Item Statistics
Mean p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10
Std. Deviation .50 .33 .77 .43 .43 .13 .10 .07 .10 .07
N
.509 .479 .430 .504 .504 .346 .305 .254 .305 .254
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
2.43 2.60 2.17 2.50 2.50 2.80 2.83 2.87 2.83 2.87
Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if Correlation Item Deleted
5.840 5.766 6.075 5.362 5.431 5.890 6.213 6.464 6.075 6.395
.463 .539 .461 .694 .661 .732 .612 .549 .711 .606
.864 .855 .860 .839 .843 .839 .849 .855 .843 .852
Scale Statistics Mean
Variance 2.93
7.237
Std. Deviation 2.690
N of Items 10
Universitas Sumatera Utara
127
Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat Karakteristik Responden usia Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
16
65
33.5
33.5
33.5
17
121
62.4
62.4
95.9
18
8
4.1
4.1
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
sex Frequency Valid
Laki-laki
Percent 72
Valid Percent
37.1
Cumulative Percent
37.1
37.1 100.0
Perempuan
122
62.9
62.9
Total
194
100.0
100.0
T_kelompok Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
76
39.2
39.2
39.2
Ya
118
60.8
60.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Dukungan Guru Frequency Table g1 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
119
61.3
61.3
61.3
75
38.7
38.7
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
g2 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
78
40.2
40.2
40.2
Ya
116
59.8
59.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g3 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
127
65.5
65.5
65.5
67
34.5
34.5
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
128
g2 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
78
40.2
40.2
40.2
Ya
116
59.8
59.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g4 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent 87
44.8
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
44.8
44.8 100.0
Ya
107
55.2
55.2
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g5 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
57.2
57.2
57.2
83
42.8
42.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
111
g6 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
74
38.1
38.1
38.1
Ya
120
61.9
61.9
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g7 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
67
34.5
34.5
34.5
Ya
127
65.5
65.5
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g8 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
86
44.3
44.3
44.3
Ya
108
55.7
55.7
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
129
g9 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
80
41.2
41.2
41.2
Ya
114
58.8
58.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
g10 Frequency Valid
Tidak
95
Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
49.0
Cumulative Percent
49.0
49.0 100.0
99
51.0
51.0
194
100.0
100.0
Kat_guru Frequency Valid
Kurang
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
106
54.6
54.6
54.6
Baik
88
45.4
45.4
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Dukungan Teman Frequency Table t1 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
61
31.4
31.4
31.4
Ya
133
68.6
68.6
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
t2 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
110
56.7
56.7
56.7
84
43.3
43.3
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
t3 Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak
97
50.0
50.0
50.0
Ya
97
50.0
50.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
Universitas Sumatera Utara
130
t4 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
118
60.8
60.8
60.8
76
39.2
39.2
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
t5 Frequency Valid
Tidak
101
Ya Total
Percent 52.1
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
52.1
52.1 100.0
93
47.9
47.9
194
100.0
100.0
t6 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
64.9
64.9
64.9
68
35.1
35.1
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
126
t7 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
114
58.8
58.8
58.8
80
41.2
41.2
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
t8 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
123
63.4
63.4
63.4
71
36.6
36.6
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
t9 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
128
66.0
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
66.0
66.0 100.0
66
34.0
34.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
131
t10 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
132
68.0
68.0
68.0
62
32.0
32.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
Kat_teman Frequency Valid
Kurang
Percent
133
Valid Percent
68.6
Cumulative Percent
68.6
68.6 100.0
Baik
61
31.4
31.4
Total
194
100.0
100.0
Akseptabilitas Frequency Table a1 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent 49
25.3
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
25.3
25.3 100.0
Ya
145
74.7
74.7
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a2 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
56.2
56.2
56.2
85
43.8
43.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
109
a3 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
48
24.7
24.7
24.7
Ya
146
75.3
75.3
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a4 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
92
47.4
47.4
47.4
Ya
102
52.6
52.6
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a5
Universitas Sumatera Utara
132
Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
88
45.4
45.4
45.4
Ya
106
54.6
54.6
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
a6 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
66.5
66.5
66.5
65
33.5
33.5
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
129
a7 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
141
72.7
72.7
72.7
53
27.3
27.3
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
a8 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
142
73.2
73.2
73.2
52
26.8
26.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
a9 Frequency Valid
Tidak
145
Ya Total
Percent 74.7
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
74.7
74.7 100.0
49
25.3
25.3
194
100.0
100.0
a10 Frequency Valid
Tidak Ya Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
146
75.3
75.3
75.3
48
24.7
24.7
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
133
akseptabilitas Frequency Valid
Tidak menerima
Percent
Cumulative Percent
132
68.0
68.0
68.0
62
32.0
32.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Menerima Total
Valid Percent
Pemanfaatan Frequency Table p1 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent 81
41.8
41.8
41.8
Ya
113
58.2
58.2
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p2 Frequency Valid
Tidak
98
Ya Total
Percent 50.5
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
50.5
50.5 100.0
96
49.5
49.5
194
100.0
100.0
p3 Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak
95
49.0
49.0
49.0
Ya
99
51.0
51.0
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Total
p4 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
93
47.9
47.9
47.9
Ya
101
52.1
52.1
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p5 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
80
41.2
41.2
41.2
Ya
114
58.8
58.8
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
134
Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
109
56.2
56.2
56.2
85
43.8
43.8
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
p7 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
51.5
51.5
51.5
94
48.5
48.5
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
100
p8 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
84
43.3
43.3
43.3
Ya
110
56.7
56.7
100.0
Total
194
100.0
100.0
p9 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
104
53.6
53.6
53.6
90
46.4
46.4
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Ya Total
Percent
p10 Frequency Valid
Tidak
Percent 87
Valid Percent
44.8
Cumulative Percent
44.8
44.8 100.0
Ya
107
55.2
55.2
Total
194
100.0
100.0
pemanfaatan Frequency Valid
Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
104
53.6
53.6
53.6
90
46.4
46.4
100.0
194
100.0
100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
135
Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat
Correlations Correlations gtot gtot
ttot
Pearson Correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed) ttot
atot
ptot
atot
ptot
.060
.299**
-.007
.407
.000
.922
N
194
194
194
194
Pearson Correlation
.060
1
-.037
.335**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.407
.609
.000
N
194
194
194
194
**
-.037
1
-.029
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.609
N
194
194
194
194
-.007
**
-.029
1
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
.299
.335
.688
Sig. (2-tailed)
.922
.000
.688
N
194
194
194
194
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Universitas Sumatera Utara
136
Crosstabs Kat_teman * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Kat_teman
Kurang
Baik
Total
Count
Menerima
Total
91
42
133
% within Kat_teman
68.4%
31.6%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
68.9%
67.7%
68.6%
% of Total
46.9%
21.6%
68.6%
41
20
61
% within Kat_teman
67.2%
32.8%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
31.1%
32.3%
31.4%
% of Total
21.1%
10.3%
31.4%
132
62
194
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
Count
Count % within Kat_teman % within akseptabilitas % of Total
Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction
b
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
df
.028a
1
.867
.000
1
.999
.028
1
.867
Exact Sig. (2sided)
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
b
.870 .028
1
Exact Sig. (1sided)
.496
.867
194
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
137
Kat_guru * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Kat_guru
Kurang
Baik
Count
Total
82
24
106
% within Kat_guru
77.4%
22.6%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
62.1%
38.7%
54.6%
% of Total
42.3%
12.4%
54.6%
50
38
88
% within Kat_guru
56.8%
43.2%
100.0%
% within akseptabilitas
37.9%
61.3%
45.4%
% of Total
25.8%
19.6%
45.4%
132
62
194
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
68.0%
32.0%
100.0%
Count
Total
Menerima
Count % within Kat_guru % within akseptabilitas % of Total
Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction
b
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
df
9.329a
1
.002
8.408
1
.004
9.352
1
.002
Exact Sig. (2sided)
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
b
.003 9.281
1
Exact Sig. (1sided)
.002
.002
194
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,12. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
138
Kat_teman * pemanfaatan Crosstab pemanfaatan Tidak memanfaatkan Kat_teman
Kurang
Baik
Total
Count
Memanfaatkan
Total
78
55
133
% within Kat_teman
58.6%
41.4%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
75.0%
61.1%
68.6%
% of Total
40.2%
28.4%
68.6%
26
35
61
% within Kat_teman
42.6%
57.4%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
25.0%
38.9%
31.4%
% of Total
13.4%
18.0%
31.4%
104
90
194
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
Count
Count % within Kat_teman % within pemanfaatan % of Total
Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction
b
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
df
4.317a
1
.038
3.697
1
.055
4.319
1
.038
Exact Sig. (2sided)
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
b
.044 4.295
1
Exact Sig. (1sided)
.027
.038
194
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,30. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
139
Kat_guru * pemanfaatan Crosstab pemanfaatan Tidak memanfaatkan Kat_guru
Kurang
Baik
Count
Total
54
52
106
% within Kat_guru
50.9%
49.1%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
51.9%
57.8%
54.6%
% of Total
27.8%
26.8%
54.6%
50
38
88
% within Kat_guru
56.8%
43.2%
100.0%
% within pemanfaatan
48.1%
42.2%
45.4%
% of Total
25.8%
19.6%
45.4%
104
90
194
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
53.6%
46.4%
100.0%
Count
Total
Memanfaatkan
Count % within Kat_guru % within pemanfaatan % of Total
Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction
b
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2sided) sided)
df
.667a
1
.414
.452
1
.501
.668
1
.414
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
b
.470 .664
1
Exact Sig. (1sided)
.251
.415
194
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40,82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Universitas Sumatera Utara
140
Correlations Correlations gtot gtot
ttot
Pearson Correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
ttot
atot
ptot
atot
ptot
.060
.299**
-.007
.407
.000
.922
N
194
194
194
194
Pearson Correlation
.060
1
-.037
.335**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.407
.609
.000
N
194
194
194
194
**
-.037
1
-.029
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.609
N
194
194
194
194
-.007
**
-.029
1
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
.299
.335
.688
Sig. (2-tailed)
.922
.000
.688
N
194
194
194
194
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Universitas Sumatera Utara
141
Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat Uji Normalitas Data NPar Tests One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test ttot
gtot
N Normal Parametersa
ptot
194
194
194
194
4.23
5.23
4.39
5.22
2.508
2.238
2.348
2.934
Absolute
.086
.088
.089
.092
Positive
.086
.088
.086
.081
Negative
-.075
-.088
-.089
-.092
1.196
1.224
1.243
1.279
.114
.100
.091
.076
Mean Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
atot
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Test distribution is Normal.
Multivariat Regression Variables Entered/Removedb Model 1
Variables Entered ttot, gtot
Variables Removed
a
Method . Enter
a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: atot Model Summary Model
R
R Square .304a
1
Adjusted R Square
.093
Std. Error of the Estimate
.083
2.248
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot ANOVAb Model 1
Sum of Squares Regression Residual Total
df
Mean Square
F
98.579
2
49.289
965.427
191
5.055
1064.005
193
Sig. 9.751
.000a
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot
Universitas Sumatera Utara
142
ANOVAb Model 1
Sum of Squares Regression Residual Total
df
Mean Square
F
98.579
2
49.289
965.427
191
5.055
1064.005
193
Sig. .000a
9.751
b. Dependent Variable: atot
Coefficientsa Standardized Coefficients
Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B (Constant)
Std. Error
Beta
2.943
.482
gtot
.318
.072
ttot
-.052
.065
t
Sig. 6.110
.000
.303
4.384
.000
-.055
-.798
.426
a. Dependent Variable: atot
Regression Variables Entered/Removedb Model 1
Variables Entered
Variables Removed
ttot, gtota
Method . Enter
a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: ptot Model Summary Model 1
R
R Square .336a
Adjusted R Square
.113
Std. Error of the Estimate
.104
2.777
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot ANOVAb Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
143
1
Regression
188.055
2
94.027
Residual
1473.414
191
7.714
Total
1661.469
193
.000a
12.189
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot b. Dependent Variable: ptot Coefficientsa Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B
Std. Error
Standardized Coefficients Beta
(Constant)
3.742
.595
gtot
-.036
.089
ttot
.394
.080
t
Sig. 6.289
.000
-.027
-.399
.690
.337
4.936
.000
a. Dependent Variable: ptot
Universitas Sumatera Utara
144
Lampiran 7 : Kanonik * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
o f
V a r i a n c e *
The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design s. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
194 0 0 1
o f
V a r i a n c e *
cases accepted. cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. cases rejected because of missing data. non-empty cell.
1 design will be processed. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal
atot ptot
atot
ptot
2,24824 -,00941
2,77745
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations Log(Determinant) = Bartlett test of sphericity = Significance = F(max) criterion =
-,00009 ,01678 with 1 D. F. ,897 1,52618 with (2;191) D. F.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances
atot ptot
atot
ptot
5,05459 -,05875
7,71421
Universitas Sumatera Utara
145
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot ptot
atot
ptot
965,42656 -11,22187
1473,41412
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
o f
V a r i a n c e --
EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot ptot
atot
ptot
98,57859 -27,40184
188,05495
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 94 ) Test Name DF Sig. of F
Value
Pillais 82,00 ,000 Hotellings 78,00 ,000 Wilks 80,00 ,000 Roys Note.. F statistic for
Approx. F
Hypoth. DF
Error
,20481
10,89542
4,00
3
,22933
10,83579
4,00
3
,80526
10,86575
4,00
3
,12281 WILKS' Lambda is exact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Sq. Cor
Eigenvalue
Pct.
Cum. Pct.
Canon Cor.
1 ,12281 2 ,08200
,14001
61,05138
61,05138
,35045
,08932
38,94862
100,00000
,28635
Universitas Sumatera Utara
146
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dimension Reduction Analysis Roots DF 1 TO 2 ,00 2 TO 2 ,00
Wilks L.
F
Hypoth. DF
Error
,80526
10,86575
4,00
380
,91800
17,06020
1,00
191
Sig. of F
,000 ,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (2;191) D. F. Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. Rsq. Hypoth. MS Error MS atot 9,75139 ptot 12,18887
,09265 ,000 ,11319 ,000
F
Sig. of F
,08315
49,28929
5,05459
,10390
94,02748
7,71421
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable atot ptot
1
2
-,20693 ,29312
,37245 ,17419
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable atot ptot
1
2
-,48587 ,86003
,87451 ,51107
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Function No.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
147
Variable atot ptot
1
2
-,51085 ,87414
,85967 ,48567
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. COV
Pct Var DEP
Cum Pct DEP
Pct Var COV
Cum Pct
1
51,25504
51,25504
6,29481
6,29
2
48,74496
100,00000
3,99692
10,29
481 173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES Function No. COVARIATE gtot ttot
1
2
-,21738 ,36015
,39133 ,17273
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR. COVARIATE gtot ttot
1
2
-,48647 ,90328
,87575 ,43322
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables CAN. VAR. Covariate gtot ttot
1
2
-,43245 ,87418
,90166 ,48560
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Universitas Sumatera Utara
148
Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. COV
Pct Var DEP
Cum Pct DEP
Pct Var COV
Cum Pct
1
5,84100
5,84100
47,55992
47,55
2
4,29990
10,14090
52,44008
100,00
992 000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable .. atot COVARIATE Value Sig. of t
B Lower -95%
gtot
,3175620935 ,17467 ttot -,0515529701 ,79753 ,426 Dependent variable .. ptot ,000
COVARIATE Value Sig. of t gtot ,39900 ttot ,000
,3026715609 ,46046 -,0550674361 -,17905
B Lower -95%
-,0357097087 ,690 ,3941952744 ,23668
Beta Std. Err. CL- Upper ,07244 ,06464 ,07595
Beta Std. Err. CL- Upper
-,0272367323 -,21224 ,3369599727 ,55171
,08950 ,14082 ,07986
t-
4,38351 -
t-
4,93629
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
o f
V a r i a n c e --
EFFECT .. CONSTANT Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products
atot ptot
atot
ptot
188,72336 239,97662
305,14917
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 0, N = 94 )
Universitas Sumatera Utara
149
Test Name DF Sig. of F
Value
Pillais ,28897 ,000 90,00 Hotellings ,40641 90,00 ,000 Wilks ,71103 90,00 ,000 Roys ,28897 Note.. F statistics are exact.
Exact F
Hypoth. DF
Error
38,60872
2,00
1
38,60872
2,00
1
38,60872
2,00
1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No.
Eigenvalue
Pct.
Cum. Pct.
Canon Cor.
1
,40641
100,00000
100,00000
,53756
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (1;191) D. F. Variable MS atot 459 ptot 421
Hypoth. SS Error SS F Sig. of F 188,72336 37,33703 305,14917 39,55676
965,42656 ,000 1473,41412 ,000
Hypoth. MS
Error
188,72336
5,05
305,14917
7,71
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable atot ptot
1 ,31150 ,25939
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized discriminant function coefficients Function No.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
150
Variable atot ptot
1 ,70032 ,72045
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Estimates of effects for canonical variables Canonical Variable Parameter 1
1 1,88747
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Canonical Variable Variable atot ptot
1 ,69354 ,71386
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Universitas Sumatera Utara
153
Universitas Sumatera Utara
154
Universitas Sumatera Utara
155
Universitas Sumatera Utara
156
Universitas Sumatera Utara
