www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
Rail Network Development Jiří HRUBOŇ KORID LK (CZ)
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF This project is supported by the German Federal Transnational Cooperation programme
15.05.2013
1
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
Location of the Liberec region
Germany
15.05.2013
2
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
Characteristics of the Liberec region (1)
The second smallest region in the Czech Republic (out of 13)
The capital of the Liberec Region is the fifth biggest city in the Czech Republic
The high rate of unemployment, especially in the peripheral parts of the region (forces residents to commute to work outside their hometowns)
The demand for public transport rises
15.05.2013
3
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Characteristics of the Liberec region (2)
Lacks connection to other crucial railway corridors
The only regional capital in the country which lacks a good quality railway connection with Prague
The regional railway tracks are run through a hilly, sometimes even mountainous terrain
The regional railways suffer from longterm underinvestment
Outdated infrastructure contrasts with the increasing quality of rolling stocks Decrease in the railway’s competitiveness with other means of transport
4
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Passenger rail transport stakeholders in the Liberec region
Passenger rail authorities are:
The Liberec Region (regional trains)
The Ministry of transport (long-distance trains – express trains)
KORID LK - coordinator of public transport in the Liberec Region (not only trains, but also buses, city transport)
Transport providers
Railway infrastructure manager
Coordinator
Ministry of transport
The Liberec Region
X X
X
X
Infrastructure manager
Transport providers
The Liberec Region doesn’t have any contract with the infrastructure manager
5
www.interregiorail.eu
Liberec
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
6
The goals of the KORID pilot project
Increase in the competitiveness of the railway in relation to other means of transport
Retaining the passengers in the system especially in routine journeys to school and work
Development of the railway network in harmony with current trends, needs and limits
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Methods
Analysis of the current situation
Preparation of the transport concept
Setting conditions for realization of the concept
Sorting according to priorities and establishing a plan for each railway line
Analysis
Concept
Conditions
Priorities
Output: Strategy for dealing with management of the Liberec Region, Ministry of transport, the infrastructure manager and other partners The crucial precondition for success to avoid wasting energy fighting over individual solutions is a consensus of opinion of all main parties
7
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
8
Findings (1) Establishing necessary investments according to the offered services and benefits
Lines with low potential tender calls for the lowest price, (low cost, basic quality)
Lines with a middle potential better use of existing possibilities, the proposal of spot improvements and organizational changes
Lines with a high potential a major modernisation mostly in a new track
Line
Potential
Liberec - Česká Lípa
Low
Liberec – Tanvald
Middle
Liberec - Mladá Boleslav (Praha) High
We now have data for dealing with investors
Investments 6 M€ 40 M€ 586 M€
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
9
Findings (2)
Some needs demand greatly lower costs than expected - much can be achieved by organizational changes, modifications of the transport concept (timetable), spot modernisations of intersection points
The example of the Liberec – Česká Lípa line
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
10
Findings (3)
The example of the Liberec – Praha line
Some needs demand significant investment cost.
It is necessary to have project planning in advance to block a new route in regional plans and to prepare projects for grant applications
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Transferability to other passenger rail authorities
Passenger rail authorities have to know about their needs on the long-term horizon
The costs and benefits of the proposed measures have to be quantified Šluknov
39
Rumburk
38 26
21
22 34
směr Jelenia Góra - Wroclaw
3 57 16 43
Rybniště
7
Markvartice
Svor
Rynoltice
8 Benešov n.P. 49 bez ná roků
Česká Lípa hl.n.
S:12/L:20 L:58/L:03
L:58/L:03
L:37/S:33
L:42/S:36 L:56/S:52
L:58/S:53
S:19/L:21
S:14 L:40 X:27 X:31
Františkov n.
UL Západ
Ústí n.L.
Blíževedl
16 44 13 20 38 43 15
X:26 odj. S:30 X:34/(X:04) X:25/(X:55) S:03/S:32 L:56/L:26 L:13/S:32 S:47/L:27
S:33 L:22
45 12
Žizníkov
55
S:40/L:16 L:20/S:43
bez ná roků
-
S:00/S:42
L:39/S:11 L:59/L:18
-
Turnov
S:20/L:09
odj. S:30
Železný Brod
L:42
S:01
S:17
L:30/S:40
S:29/L:20
S:30
L:29 X:34/(X:00)
M.B. - Pra ha : při hodi novém rychl ém s egmentu probl ematický průvoz ml adobol eslavských Os v ús eku Všetaty -
S:58/S:16
S:34/L:47
S:33/(L:46)
L:45/(S:49)
S:43/L:22
S:59/L:40
L:02/L:43
L:26/S:13
L:27/(S:14)
S:15/(L:10)
Náchod
Horka u
(Os/Os Kuks!)
Hrubá Skála Ml.Boleslav město 26 33
20 příj. L:40 39 odj. S:15
s měr Dol ní Bous ov
L:35 S:24
X:00 X:56
L:57
58 1
41 18
40 19
X:00 /X:14 X:59/X:49
13
30 29 X:02 X:54
31 28 L:58 S:00
43
X:06 /X:21 X:54/X:42
Neratovice
14 41
52 8
S:20 L:39
0 Ostroměř 53 2
0 57
Nymburk hl.n.
S:02
Lysá n. L.
57 X:59 X:58
Ba rtouš ov
Nevhodné dojezdové ča s y s měr Turnov v Ji číně.
Všetaty
Jičín
příj. L:23 X:21 X:37 odj. S:37
L:32 S:27
X:58/(X:44) X:02/(X:18)
1 58
Starkoč L:14 S:46
S:16 L:44 L:16 S:44
29 28
Chotětov
Zhorš ení konektivity pro ná va zné tra tě v Nera tovicích.
Jaroměř
L:00/S:18
S:45 L:15
X:27/(X:57)
Ml.Boleslav hl.n.
Kralupy n.Vlt.
Dvůr 23 32 Stará Paka
bez ná roků
L:16/S:36
Košťálov Příl i š ostrá přes tupní va zba Turnov - Čes ká Lípa v Ml a dé Bol eslavi
Teplice n.M.
Tra ť 040: preci zace modelu a potřeba zkrá cení jízdních dob s ohledem na technologii a návaznosti v uzl ových s tanicích.
L:41/S:58 S:18/L:01
L:58 příj. L:25
Trutnov hl.n. 27 uzel v X:30 27 0 57
Velké
3 0 58
57 57
Hodkovice n.M.
L:20 -
V Turnově chybí s ys témová va zba pra žs kých R s měr Ji čín a Li berec (lze Os/R)
0 Lovosice
58 55
Mnich.
Bezděz
Bakov n.J. 58
Kunčice n.L.
Tanvald
X:30 příj. L:25
S:22/L:24
- S:39
58
X:19/(X:49) X:30/(X:00)
L:35/S:31
odj. S:27
V Čes ké Lípě va zba Mi moň-Doksy jen Os.
1
š pa tná návaznost pra žs kých R na tra ť do Ha rra chova v Ta nvaldě
X:24 X:29
příj. L:22
S:29 L:26 X:41 X:17
42
Liberec
S:20/L:22 L:37/S:37
Vesec
36
X:30/(X:00)
22
bez ná roků směr FrýdlantS:57/(L:57) L:53/(S:53)
X:26/(X:56)
Děčín hl.n.
Harrachov
Mníšek
L:32/S:20
20
S:56 L:58 směr Hrádek n. N.
Jedlová
L:50/(S:50) -
50
vždy přes tup S:28 S:24
Chrastava
- S:10/(L:10)
S:33/L:37
40
směr Cottbus
uzel 00
uzel v 30
29 31 30 bez ná roků 30
Železniční doprava severovýchodní Čechy MODEL LK
uzel v S:30Szklarska Poreba Górna
S:22/(L:22)
Smržovka
Koordi novat trasy Os v ús eku Děčín - Benešov n. P. a Jedl ová -
S:25 S:36
L:38/(S:38) S:20/(L:20)
17 43
L:40/(S:40)
bez ná roků
Zittau
Jablonec n. N.
Mikulášovice d.n.
Hradce Králové hl.n. Nové Město
Hněvčeves
26 32 Chlumec n.C. 29 27
28 0
- při s tá vající ča sové poloze hradeckých R jen obtížně řešitelná vazba M. Bol eslav - Hra dec Krá l ové v Nymburce -koordinovat trasy R v ús eku Nymburk - Velký Os ek - ji né návaznosti v uzl u Kolín
Kolín
S:29 L:31 L:29 S:31
4 53
Týniště 8 58 S:32 L:29 L:32 S:29
S:49 L:12 L:49 S:12
Pardubice hl.n.
Choceň
X:08/X:22 X:53/X:41
Měšice
Pra ha : X:47 X:09
The pilot project provides a strategy for the successful targeting of all activities > model output
11
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Thank you for your attention Contact Jiří HRUBOŇ
[email protected]
12
