Bidang Unggulan: Good Governance
LAPORAN AKHIR HASIL PENELITIAN HIBAH BERSAING INSTITUSI BATCH I TAHUN ANGGARAN 2012
Judul
: Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Paternalistik terhadap Komitmen PNS dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Kredibel dan Akuntabel
Ketua
:
Dodi Wirawan Irawanto, SE., M.Com., PhD. NIDN. 0010127604
Anggota
:
1. Dr. Fatchur Rohman, SE., MSi. NIDN. 0021016104 2.Nadiyah Hirfiyana Rosita, SE., MM. NIDN. 0029098601
Dibiayai oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Melalui DIPA Universitas Brawijaya nomor : 0636/02304.2.16/15/2012, tanggal 9 Desember 2011, dan berdasarkan SK Rektor Universitas Brawijaya Nomor : 366/SK/2012 tanggal 13 Agustus 2012
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Brawijaya 2012
ABSTRAK Untuk membuat sistem pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel, pemerintah harus menetapkan sistem pemerintahan yang responsif dan memiliki orientasi ke pekerjaan profesional dengan praktek model kepemimpinan yang baik juga. Irawanto (2008) mengusulkan sebuah model kepemimpinan yang berakar pada budaya lokal yang jika diterapkan dengan benar akan menyebabkan efektivitas organisasi, yang disebut model kepemimpinan paternalistik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat apakah ada pengaruh kepemimpinan paternalistik pada komitmen PNS dalam memberikan pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada metode penelitian survei. Populasi penelitian ini adalah pegawai negeri sipil dengan pangkat kepala bagian minimal meliputi pegawai negeri sipil yang bekerja di Pemerintah Kota dan Kabupaten, diwakili oleh tiga kota besar di Jawa Timur, kota Malang, Batu dan Kabupaten. Dengan menyebarkan kuesioner pada total 80 responden dan data dianalisa menggunakan PLS (PLS SMART) terbukti bahwa kepemimpinan paternalistik memiliki dampak positif dan signifikan terhadap demografi PNS di mana persepsi responden lebih tinggi dengan kebutuhan atasan mereka untuk menerapkan kepemimpinan paternalistik sehingga berimplikasi pada tingginya komitmen mereka terhadap organisasi meskipun dimediasi oleh demografi PNS. Disarankan kepada Pemerintah Kota Malang, Batu dan Kabupaten Malang bahwa mereka untuk mensosialisasikana para pejabat di lingkungan mereka untuk memperluas pemahaman akan gaya kepemimpinan dengan model kepemimpinan paternalistik. Kata kunci: Pemerintah, Kepeminpinan Paternalistik, Komitmen PNS, Kredibel, Akuntabel
ABSTRACT To create a system of government that credible and accountable, government must set a system of governance that is responsive and have a oritentation to the professional work with a good leadership model practices as well. Irawanto (2008) proposed a model of leadership that is rooted in the local culture that if implemented properly will lead to organizational effectiveness, which is called paternalistic leadership model. This study aims to see if there is an influence of paternalistic leadership on civil commitment in delivering a credible governance and accountable. This study is based on survey research methods. This study population is a civil servant with the rank of section chief minimal covering civil servants working in the City and Kabupaten Government, represented by three major cities in East Java, the city of Malang, Batu and the District. By distributing questionnaires on total of 80 respondents and anaylsed the data using PLS (SMART PLS) it is proved that paternalistic leadership has a positive and significant impact on PNS demographics where the higher the respondent's perception to the need of their superiors to practice paternalistic leadership the higher their commitment to the organizational as well although it is mediated by demographics of PNS. It is recommended to the Government of Malang, Batu and Malang regency that they should note that the officials in their environment to broaden the model of paternalistic leadership. Keywords: Government, Paternalistic Leadership, Civil Servants Commitment, Credible, Accountable
RINGKASAN Di dalam upaya menciptakan sistem pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel, pemerintah telah menetapkan sistem tata kelola pemerintahan yang responsif dan berorientasikan kepada professional kerja. Tata kelola pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel idealnya tidak terlepas dari peran pemimpin di dalam mengarahkan segala sesuatu yang terkait dengan penyelenggaraan sistem pemerintahan dengan mengacu kepada UU yang berlaku serta sistem nilai/value ke-organisasian yang berlaku. Nilai individu di dalam organisasi secara tidak langsung sangat dipengaruhi oleh lingkungan kepemimpinan yang berlaku. Untuk konteks Indonesia, di dalam menjawab tantangan KKN yang semakin merajalela, terutama di era otonomi daerah ini (Hamilton-Hart 2001) dibutuhkan sebuah model kepemimpinan yang aplikatif di segala sektor kehidupan masyarakat, terutama di pemerintahan. Irawanto (2008) mengemukakan sebuah model kepemimpinan yang berakar pada budaya lokal yang jika diterapkan dengan baik akan berujung pada keefektifitasan organisasi, yakni model kepemimpinan Paternalistik. jika kepemimpinan Paternalistik memberikan dampak positif terhadap aspek psikologis PNS dalam menjalankan tugasnya – apakah juga memberikan jaminan terhadap tercapainya komitmen PNS dalam tata kelola yang kredibel dan akuntabel. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: 1. Melihat apakah ada pengaruh Kepemimpinan Paternalistik terhadap komitmen PNS di dalam mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel. 2. Melihat apakah ada pengaruh antara Persepsi Good Corporate Governance terhadap Komitmen PNS di dalam mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel. 3. Melihat apakah faktor demografi PNS memegang peranan penting baik itu dalam persepsi Kepemimpinan Paternalistik maupun Persepsi Good Corporate Governance terhadap Komitmen PNS di dalam mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel. Studi literatur kepemimpian secara komprehensif dapat disimpulkan bahwa dominasi penelitian kepemimpinan masih menggunakan teori-teori yang berasal dari Amerika, seperti kepemimpinan transformasional. Tentu anggapan ini tidak benar, karena acapkali pemimpin mengalami kesulitan dalam beradaptasi dengan budaya-budaya para bawahannya. Selain itu, di dunia penelitian sendiri, kepemimpinan transformasional juga dianggap sebagai salah satu model kepemimpian sukses abad ini. konsep kepemimpinan Paternalistik ada tiga elemen pembentuk kepemimpinan ini (Cheng, Chou et al. 2004), antara lain : (1) Kepemimpinan otokratis; (2) Kepemimpinan kebajikan; dan (3) Kepemimpinan moral. Studi terbaru mengenai kepemimpinan paternalistik di Indonesia (Irawanto, 2010 dan Irawanto et al¸ 2012) membuktikan bahwa Kepemimpinan Paternalistik dapat di terima di konteks Indonesia, terutama pada pegawan negeri sipil. Adapun kepemimpinan Paternalistik veris Indonesia yang dikembangkan oleh Irawanto (2011) adalah model kepemimpinan dengan dimensi yang agak berbeda dengan model yang sudah dikembangkan oleh peneliti Taiwan, yakni: (1) Kepemimpinan Visibel, (2) Kepemimpinan Otoriter, (3) Kepemimpinan Kebajikan, (4) Kepemimpinan Moral (tidak korupsi), (5) Kepemimpinan Moral (adil), (6) Kepemimpinan Moral (keberanian) dan (7). Kepemimpinan Moral (murah hati). Komitmen organisasi diartikan sebuah konsekuensi perilaku logis dari seorang individu untuk memberikan perilaku menerima serta loyal terhadap organisasi di mana mereka bekerja (Shore, Barksdale dan Shore T, 1995). Lebih lanjut Meyer dan Allen (1984) mengemukakan bahwa komitmen seseorang terhadap organisasi merupakan suatu bentuk
investasi psikosoial individu dengan harapan imbalan kompensiasi serta karir, dimana di lain sisi jika mereka meninggalkan organisasi akan berimplikasi kepada ongkos yang tinggi. Meyer dan Allen mengajukan beberapa dimensi dari Komitmen Organisasi. Hardjasoemantri (2003) Kunci utama memahami good governance, menurut Masyarakat Transparansi Indonesia (MTI), adalah pemahaman atas prinsip-prinsip yang mendasarinya. Bertolak dari prinsip-prinsip ini didapat tolok ukur kinerja suatu pemerintah. Sanusi (2012) menjelaskan maksud dari good governance adalah mewujudkan kepemerintahan yang baik. Sedangkan tujuan dari good governance adalah: (1) meningkatnya disiplin dan etos kerja pegawai, (2) meningkatnya kualitas pelayanan publik, (3) meningkatnya produktifitas, efisiensi, dan efektifitas operasional, (4) meningkatnya akuntabilitas dan transparansi, (5) mencegah praktek korupsi, kolusi, dan nepotisme. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada penelitian eksplanatori dengan metode survei. Populasi penelitian ini adalah PNS dengan jabatan minimal Kepala seksi meliputi PNS yang bekerja di Pemerintahan Kota dan Kabupater, yang diwakili oleh 3 kota besar di Jawa Timur, yakni Kota Malang, Kota Batu dan Kabupaten Malang. Sedangkan metode penarikan sampel dengan menggunakan metode accidental random sampling. Secara singkat variabel penelitian adalah (1) Kepemimpinan Paternalistik (PLI) yang dikembangkanoleh Irawanto (2011) dengan 7 sub variabel yakni kepemimpinan visibel, otoriter, kebajikan, dan 4 (empat) tipe kepemimpinan moral. Sedangkan variabel ke dua (2) adalah Komitmen Organisasional yang dikembangkan oleh Meyer dan Allen (1997) dengan yang terdiri dari 5 sub variabel yakni komitmen afeksi, komitmen kontinyu, komitmen normatif, komitmen kewajiban, dan komitmen moral. Selain itu untuk menilai persepsi PNS terhadap good goverenance yang kredibel dan akuntabel digunakan instrumen penelitian yang dikembangkan di Indonesia yakni oleh Trisnaningsih (2003) di Indonesian Institute of Corporate Governance yang terdiri dari tujuh pertanyaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hubungan variabel Kepimimpinan Paternalistik (X1) dengan Demografi PNS (Y1) menunjukkan nilai koefisien jalur sebesar 0,779 dengan nilai t sebesar 15,904 Nilai tersebut lebih besar dari t tabel (1,960). Hasil ini berarti bahwa Kepemimpinan Paternalistik memiliki hubungan yang positif dan signifikan terhadap Demografi PNS dimana semakin tinggi persepsi responden akan perlunya atasan mereka mempraktekan Kepemimpinan Paternalistik semakin tinggi pula Demografi PNS mereka. Juga ditemukan hubungan variabel Demografi PNS (Y1) dengan Komitmen Organisasi (Y2) menunjukkan nilai koefisien jalur sebesar 0,397 dengan nilai t sebesar 1,813 Nilai tersebut mendekati dari t tabel (1,960). Hasil ini berarti bahwa Demografi PNS memiliki hubungan yang positif dan signifikan terhadap Komitmen Organisasi dimana semakin tinggi faktor Demografi PNS akan berimplikasi pada semakin tinggi pula Komitmen Organisasi mereka. Disarankan kepada Pemerintah Kota Malang, Kota Batu dan Kabupaten Malang perlu memperhatikan bahwa para pejabat di lingkungan mereka untuk membuka wawasan terhadap model Kepemimpinan Paternalistik. Paling tidak dari penelitian ini dapat dilihat bahwa pejabat eselon IV mempunyai preferensi yang tinggi terhadap pemimpin yang bisa mengaplikasikan Kepemimpinan Paternalistik. Ini merupakan langkah yang positif mengingat dengan aplikasi Kepemimpinan Paternalistk dapat meningkatkan komitmen PNS terhadap organisasi. Secara bersama-sama juga mampu untuk menciptakan tata kelola pemerintahan yang kredibel dan akuntabel.
SUMMARY In the effort to create a credible system of governance and accountable the government has to set a system of governance that is responsive and oriented to the professionalism. Credible and accountable governance ideally not be separated from the role of leadership in directing all things related to the implementation of the system of government with reference to the applicable law and the system of values/ value that the organization in the force. Individual values in organizations indirectly greatly influenced by the prevailing environmental leadership. For the context of Indonesia, in the challenge of corruption which is rampant, especially in the era of regional autonomy (Hamilton-Hart 2001) takes a leadership model applicable in all sectors of public life, especially in government. Irawanto (2008) proposed a model of leadership that is rooted in the local culture that if implemented properly will lead to the organizational effectiveness, ie, paternalistic leadership model. If paternalistic leadership have a positive impact on the psychological aspects of civil servants in carrying out their duties - whether it also gives assurance to the achievement of civil commitment in the governance of a credible and accountable. This study aims to: 1. See if there is an influence paternalistic leadership on civil commitment in delivering a credible governance and accountability 2. See if there is influence between perception Good Corporate Governance for civil commitment in delivering a credible governance and accountability. 3. See if the demographic factors play an important role of civil servants both in the perception of paternalistic leadership and the perception of good corporate governance for civil commitment in delivering a credible governance and accountability. In a comprehensive leadership literature study it can be concluded that the dominance of leadership studies still use theories from America, such as transformational leadership. Of course this assumption is not true, because often leaders have difficulty in adapting to the cultures of their subordinates. In addition, in the world of research itself, transformational leadership is also regarded as one of this century successful models of leaderships. On the other hand Paternalistic leadership concept, there are three elements forming this leadership (Cheng, Chou et al., 2004), among others: (1) autocratic leadership, (2) benevolent leadership and (3) moral leadership. Recent studies on paternalistic leadership in Indonesia (Irawanto, 2010 and Irawanto et al. ¸ 2012) proved that paternalistic leadership can be accepted in the context of Indonesia, especially in civil servants (PNS). Indonesian Paternalistic leadership model developed by Irawanto (2011) is a model of leadership with a slightly different dimension to the model that has been developed by researchers in Taiwan, namely: (1) Visible Leadership, (2) Authoritarian Leadership, (3) Benevolent Leadership, (4) Moral Leadership (incorruptness), (5) Moral Leadership (magnanimity) (6) Moral Leadership (courage) and (7). Moral Leadership (impartialness). Organizational commitment is defined a logical consequence of the behavior of an individual to provide loyalty behavioral to the organization in which they work (Shore, Barksdale and Shore T, 1995). Furthermore, Meyer and Allen (1984) suggests that one's commitment to the organization is a form of investment in the hope of reward individual psicosocial compensation and career, where on the other side if they leave the organization will have implications for the higher cost.
Hardjasoemantri (2003) stated that a key to understanding of good governance, according to the Indonesian Transparency Society (MTI), is an understanding of the underlying principles. Starting from these principles derived performance benchmarks of a government. Sanusi (2012) describes the purpose of good governance is to achieve good governance. While the goal of good governance are: (1) increased discipline and work ethic of employees, (2) increasing the quality of public services, (3) increased productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness of operations, (4) increasing accountability and transparency, (5) prevent illegal corruption, collusion and nepotism. This study is based on survey research with explanatory methods. This study population is a civil servant with the rank of section chief minimal covering civil servants working in the City and Regency Government, represented by three major cities in East Java, the city of Malang, Batu and the Malang Regency. The sampling method is used the with accidental method. In brief, the study variables were (1) paternalistic leadership (PLI), which developed by Irawanto (2011) with 7 sub-variables that visible leadership, authoritarian, benevolent, and 4 (four) types of moral leadership. While the others reserch variables were Organizational Commitment was developed by Meyer and Allen (1997) with which consists of five sub-variables namely affective commitment, continuous commitment, normative commitment. In addition to assessi perceptions of civil servants to good goverenance that a credible and accountable use of research instruments developed in Indonesia, namely by Trisnaningsih (2003) at the Indonesian Institute of Corporate Governance, which consists of eight questions. The results showed paternalistic leadership variables (X1) have a postiive relationship with PNS Demography (Y1) shows the path coefficient of 0.779 with a value of 15.904 t value is greater than t table (1.960). This result means that paternalistic leadership has a positive and significant impact on Demographics PNS where the higher the respondent's perception of the need that theoir superiors practice paternalistic leadership although tis is medited by Demographics PNS. Also it is that found a relationship PNS Demographic variables (Y1) and Organizational Commitment (Y2) shows the path coefficient of 0.397 with a value of 1.813 t value is approached from the t table (1.960). This result means that the Demographics PNS has a positive and significant impact on Organizational Commitment in which the higher civil servants Demographic factors will have implications on the higher commitment to their organization. It is recommended to the Government of Malang, Batu and Malang regency that they should note that the officials in their environment to broaden the model of paternalistic leadership . At least from this study can be seen that the Echelon IV have a high preference for leaders who can apply paternalistic leadership. This is a positive step considering the application of Paternalistic Leadership of civil servants that can increase commitment to the organization. Taken together also able to create a credible governance and accountability.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA --------, (2012). Sekilas Kota Malang. Diakses melalu Mozilla Firefox explorer pada tanggal 10 Desember 2012. http://malangkota.go.id/mlg_halaman.php?id=1606071 --------, (2012). Profil Kota Batu. Diakses melalu Mozilla Firefox explorer pada tanggal 10 Desember 2012. http://www.batukota.go.id/profil/page.sejarah-kota-batu.html --------, (2012). Profil Kabupaten Malang. Diakses melalu Mozilla Firefox explorer pada tanggal 10 Desember 2012. http://www.malangkab.go.id Bass, B. M. (1996). "A New paradigm of Leadership: An inquiry into Transformational leadership." US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Beck Jørgensen, T. (2007). "Public values, their nature, stability and change. The case of Denmark. ." Public Administrative Quarterly 30(1): 365-398. Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, USA, Georgetown Univesity Press. Budiman, A. and A. Roan (2005). Post-colonial Indonesia: A study of the impact of foreign aid on public sector institutions in West Kalimantan. CMS Conference, Waikato University, New Zealand, Management Department Waikato University. Chen, Zhen Xiong; Tsui, Anne S and Farh, Jing Lih (2002) Loyalty to Supervisor VS Organizational Commitment: Relationship to Employee Performance in China, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 75 No. 3 Cheng, B.-S., L.-F. Chou, et al. (2004). "Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations." Asian Journal Of Social Psychology 7(1): 89-117. Collier, Jane and Esteban, Rafael (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Commitment, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 16, No. 1 Dwanti, Ida. S. (2003). "Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Komitmen Karyawan (Studi pada tenaga edukatif dan adminsitratif FISIP UPN Veteran Jogyakarta". Masters Thesis, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta. Dorfman, P., W., J. P. Howell, et al. (1997). "Leadership in western and asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures " The Leadership Quarterly 8(3): 233-274. Erben, Gul Selin dan Guneser, Begum Ayse (2008) The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Commitment, Journal of Business ethics, Vol. 82, No. 4 Farazmand, Ali. (2004). “Sound governance: policy and administrative innovation” . Westport, USA, Preager. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. London, Fontana PRess. Gerbing, D., W. and J. Anderson, C. (1988). "An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment." Journal of Marketing Research 25: 186-192. Hamilton-Hart, N. (2001). "Anto-Corruption Strategies in Indonesia." Bulleting of Indonesian Economics Studies 37(1): 65-82.
Hardjasoemantri, Koesnadi. (2003). “Good Governance dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia”. Makalah untuk Lokakarya Pembangunan Hukum Nasional ke VIII di Bali, Tanggal 15 Juli 2003. Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Culture. CA, USA, Sage Publications. House, R., J. , P. J. Hanges, et al. (1999). "Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE." Advances in Global Leadership 1: 171-233. Irawanto, D. (2007). "National culture and leadership: Lesson from Indonesia." Journal of Business and Management Eksekutif 4(3): 359-367. Irawanto, D. (2008). "The applicability of paternalistic leadership in Indonesia." Journal of Human Capital 1(1): 67-80. Irawanto, D. (2009). "An Analysis of National Culture and Leadership Practices in Indonesia." Journal of Diversity Management 4(2): 41-48. Irawanto, D., P. Ramsey, et al. (2011). "Challenge of Leading in Javanese Culture." Asian Ethnicity 12(2): 125-139. Irawanto, D., P. Ramsey (2011). "Paternalistic Leadership and Employee Responses in Javanese Culture" Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business 13(3) Irawanto, D., P.Ramsey. D. Tweed. (2012). "Exploring Paternalistic Leadership and Its Application in Indonesia Context". The International Journal of Leadership in Public Service. (13)1 Jane, M., Howell and S. Boas (2005). "The Role Of Followers In The Charismatic Leadership Process: Relationships And Their Consequences." Academy of Management Review 30(1): 96-122. Javidan, M. and D. A. Waldman (2003). "Exploring Charismatic Leadership in the Public Sector: Measurement and Consequences." Public Administration Review 63(1): 229242. Jung, D., I., B. M. Bass, et al. (1995). "Bridging leadership and culture: A theoritical consideration of transformational leadership and collectivist culture." The Journal of Leadership Studies 2(4): 3-15. Leithwood, K. and D. Jantzi (2005). Transformational Leadership. The Essentials of School Leadership B. Davies. London, Paul Chapman. Littrell, R., L. (2002). "Desirable Leadership Behaviours of Multicultrual Managers in Cina." Journal of Management Development 21(1): 5-74. Martinez, P., G. (2005). Paternalism as a postive form of leadership in the latin America context: Leader benevolence, decision making control, and human resource management practices. Managing Human Resource in Latin America. M. Elvira, M. and A. Davila. London, Routledge Publisher. Meyer, J. and N. Allen (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory,research and Applicaiton. NY, USA, Sage. Nurjanah. (2008)." Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan" Master Thesis UNDIP Semarang.
Osborne, Stephen P. (2010). “The New Public Governance?, Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance”. NY, USA, Routledge. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. Sydney, Allen&Unwin. Robertson-Snape, F. (1999). "Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Indonesia." Public Administration Review 20(3): 589-602. Rost, J., C. (1993). "Leadership development in the new millenium." Journal of Leadership and Organizaitional Studies 1(1): 91-110. Sanusi, Achmad. (2012). “Tatakelola Pemerintahan yang Baik dan Akuntabilitas sektor Publik di Indonesia”. Materi Kuliah Umum di Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Tanggal 12 Oktober 2012 Schwartz, A. (2000). A Nation in waiting: Indonesia's search for stability. Colorado, USA, Westview Press. Smith, P., J. Misumi, et al. (1989). "On the Generality of Leadership Style Measures Across Cultures." Journal of Occupational Psychology 62(2): 97-103. Trisnaningsih. (2003). "Pengaruh Komtimen Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Auditor: Motiasi sebagai variable intervening (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jawa Timur). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia 6(1): 199-216 Wang, H., L. Kenneth, et al. (2005). "Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior." Academy of Management Journal 48(3): 420-432. Wati, Elya., Lismawati. N. Aprilla. (2010). "Pengaruh Independensi, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Komitmen Organisasi, dan Pemahaman Goof Governance terhadap Kinerja Auditor Pemerintah (studi pada auditor pemerintah di BPKP Perwakilan Bengkulu). Prooceding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII. Purwokerto Yang, Kaifeng and Pandey, Sanjay (2009) How Do perceived Political Environment and Administrative Reform Affect Employee Commitment, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 9 No. 2 Zhao, S. (1994). "Human resource management in China." Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 32(2): 3-12.
