LAMPIRAN
LAMPIRAN 1 Tabel Ranking Severity Ranking
Effect
10
Hazardous
9
Serious
8
Extreme
7
Major
6
Significat
5
Moderate
4
Minor
3
Slight
2
Very Slight
1
None
Criteria : Severity of Effect Hazardous effect without warnin. Safety related. Regulatory non-complaint. Potential hazzardous effect. Able to stop without wishap. Regulatory compliance in jeopardy. Item operable but safe. Costumer very dissatisfied. Performance severely affected but functional and safe. Costumer dissatisfied. Performance degraded but operable and safe. Non vital part inoperable. Costumer experience discomfort Performance moderely affected. Fault on non vital part need repair. Costumer experience some dissatisfactin. Minor effect on performnace. Fault does not require repair. Non vital fault always noticed. Slight effect on performance. Non vital fault notice most of the time. Costumer is slight annoyed. Very slight effect on performance. Non-vital fault may be noticed. Costumer is not annoyed. No effect
LAMPIRAN 2 Tabel Ranking Occurrence Ranking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Possible Failure Rates ≥ 1 in 2 1 in 3 1 in 8 1 in 20 1 in 80 1 in 400 1 in 2.000 1 in 15.000 1 in 150.000 1 in 1.500.000
Probability of Failure Almost certain Very high High Moderately high Medium Low slight Very slight Remote Almost imposibble
LAMPIRAN 3 Tabel Ranking Detectability Ranking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Detection Absolute Uncertainty Very Remote Remote Very Low Low Moderate Moderately High High Very high Almost Certain
Criteria : Likelihood of Detection by Design Control No design control or design control will not detect potential causes. Very remote chance design will detect potential causes. Remote chance design will detect potential causes. Very low chance design will detect potential causes. Low chance design will detect potential causes. Moderate chance design will detect potential causes. Moderately high chance design will detect potential causes. High chance design will detect potential causes. Very high chance design will detect potential causes. Almost certain That the design control will detect potential causes.
LAMPIRAN 4 Simbol – simbol yang digunakan dalam Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
Top Event atau Intermediate Event (masalah utama yang terjadi)
Basic Event (Kejadian Paling Dasar)
OR Gate
AND Gate
Undeveloped Event
Transfer Gate
SURAT KETERANGAN PERUSAHAAN Dalam surat ini menyatakan bahwa mahasiswa Universitas Kristen Maranatha yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini :
Nama
: Tresna Egy Suwandi
NRP
: 0823069
Jurusan / Fakultas
: Teknik Industri / Teknik
Bahwa benar telah melakukan penelitian untuk keperluan Tugas Akhir di PT. Setiatex.
Demikian surat keterangan ini dibuat untuk keperluan kelengkapan akademik dalam mencapai gelar Sarjana Strata Satu (S1) pada jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Bandung melalui laporan tugas akhir mahasiswa tersebut
Bandung, 29 Juni 2012
PT Setiatex
KOMENTAR DAN SARAN SIDANG Nama
: Tresna Egy Suwandi
NRP
: 0823069
Nama Dosen Pembimbing
: Rudijanto Muis, S.T., M.T.
Nama Dosen Penguji
:
1. Ir. Christina Wirawan, M.T. 2. Christina, S.T., M.T. 3. Ir. Rudy Wawolumaja, M.Sc. Komentar dan Saran
:
Perhatikan Pengetikan sesuai EYD.
Usulan lebih diperjelas dan kongkrit.
Perjelas dan perbaiki butir – butir perumusan penelitian.
Perjelas dan perbaiki butir – butir tujuan penelitian.
Cek kembali FTA secara logis.
DATA PENULIS Nama
: Tresna Egy Suwandi
NRP
: 0823069
Alamat
: Jalan Mutiara-Sampora No. 23 Kp. Sekeawi Desa Sukamenak Kec. Margahayu Kab. Bandung
Tempat Tanggal Lahir: Bandung, 04 Agustus 1990 Alamat email
:
[email protected] /
[email protected] /
[email protected]
Pendidikan
:
Sekolah Dasar Negeri Sukamenak V (1996 – 2002)
Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 38 Bandung (2002 – 2005)
Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 11 Bandung (2005 – 2008)
Universitas Kristen Maranatha (2008 – 2012)
Tanggal Sidang
: 01 Agustus 2012
Nilai Sidang
: A (3,46)
