Genesis remarks P.A.Semi, , translated Formation of the universe

Genesis remarks P.A.Semi, 2014-02-14, translated 2014-03-21

Formation of the universe Gn1 1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. 6. And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. 9. And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. 10. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good. Although meaning of most of the Bible is rather Symbolic and Spiritual, these introductory chapters describe an actual physical action, which with the present-day level of human knowledge can be explained and understood, but in the antiquity time there were neither terms nor physical knowledge to understanding this. It can be shown, that the universe has got the topology of a hypersphere, as already Einstein originally contemplated, before he was convinced about the big bang by other scientists of that time. Later he called the supplement of universe expansion (constant Λ lambda) into his equations as the biggest blunder of his live (and we'll show that not only his one)... Recently an australian scientist David Crawford managed to explain [CC2011] most of related phenomena such a way, that they would not be in contradiction with the observations, but even to correspond with them better, than scientists infer from the agreed-upon concordance model of the big bang... Also can be shown, that no dark energy nor dark matter is needed to explain observations, and that these are just consequential miscues, used to explain gaps in previous miscues... From these Einstein's equations arises, that the universe is hyper-spherical (4-dimensional sphere, where our universe is it's 3-dimensional surface), and is finite while still having no border. From the average density of intergalactic space (which is a principal parameter for calculating its size, and can be deduced from the observed redshift of light of far galaxies, which is due to spacetime curvature, which can be indirectly measured this way) can be determined not only the size of the universe, but also the total weight of intergalactic space, and by the relation estimate also the weight of the whole universe. From the weight and size of the universe it can be determined, that it is actually smaller, than would be a black-hole of its weight - because a black hole, the more it is heavy, the more it is sparse and large, and a black hole of the weight of all universe would be even less dense, than the current universe. [2] Our universe actually is that, what we call a black hole... Why is this solution stable can be shown. For example and not only - there is no reason for a gravitational collapse, because, due to isotropy, every galaxy has got same amount of other galaxies on all sides, nowhere is a center nor border, and so there is no reason for it to collapse to any center as a whole... Further it can be shown, how the local differences of density are getting balanced, due to space continuity. Overall size of the universe is determined mostly by the sparse gas in the intergalactic space, because galaxies are although admirable, but rather rare exceptions in the total volume, and their bigger curvature diminishes on larger distances, but the curvature due to matter in intergalactic space, which is nowhere a vacuum, is omnipresent - and total size of the universe (which is by far larger than that, what we can observe with contemporary means), is regulated by the galaxies by absorbing the matter of intergalactic space and by it's recyclation. Arround ordinary (small) black holes, in the distance of 3/2 rs (3/2 of its radius), there is a "sphere of eternal light" the place, where the space is just so curved, that the light circulates arround as planets arround the star [3]. Arround a rotating black hole the area is little wider, than a single layer. Because inside the light the time does not flow, the light ray in this place can "experience" the whole duration of the universe in one moment (which is probable meaning of that name "I am"). Existence of this sphere of eternal light can be logically deduced, but it cannot be seen by any technical 3-dimensional means. If there can be some "interligent form of energy" can neither be disproved nor confirmed by the intellect means, but due to other contexts it can be believed. Other related description can be found in Rev4, particularly in Rev4,6 - the sea of glass can be understood as an "event horizont", which divides our 3-dimensional space on the surface of the 4-dimensional hyper-sphere from the "outer" space...

It can also be shown, that the Light from this sphere of eternal light probably cannot operate in this universe directly, and also according to the record in Rev4 and Ez1 there exists probably a whole hierarchy of the helpers. It can also be shown, that a universe with this geometry could not originate by a big bang. It could originate from originally homogenous black hole, filled with very sparse hydrogen, without the light (inside), in the thermal equilibrium - and so originally it was void (homogenous) and dark (cold). Already in this time was the Spirit of God in the sphere of eternal light arround our universe (Gn1,2). The sentence Gn1,1 is rather a chapter heading and summarization. One of possibilities, how in such a space could form the condensation nuclei, which later condensed to the stars and galaxies, is an acoustic wave (with a wavelength at least on the ordinary spacing between stars, probably on the ordinary spacing between galaxies), which vibrates the hydrogen inside such, that it here and there thickens and then starts to condense by the gravitation. So in the beginning was the Word (Gn1,3, J1,1). Hydrogen clouds gradually condensed such, that the first stars were lit. Even today it can be seen in the Milky way, that this way arise stars, when an acoustic wave (for example after a supernova explosion) passes through the hydrogen cloud of the right density. And by the gradual condensation and thickening of the primordial hydrogen, the hydrogen in galaxies was divided from that one in intergalactic space (Gn1,6-10), and by decreasing the weight of intergalactic space (IGM) the overall volume of the space has decreased approximately 2 .. 5 times (the ratio of weight of IGM and galaxies). Once more about the Spirit, which "moved upon the face of the waters", and really hovers there up to present day: The spiritual world is parallel to our 3-dimesional space, and there are two of them, one is "above" (outside) and one is "below" (inside). (Filioque was really groundless, these are absolutelly different dimensions: I think, that a continent compared to an ant is too much near... On the other side I do not derogate the extent of the spirit of Christ, in the dimension of a Good evolution (at least for many centuries, probably even overall?) of this civilisation, but our human civilisation is just a sand grain in the extent of the universe...)

And for the Spirit of God, which experiences eternal presence "I am", the whole duration of the universe in one moment, the difference between a "day" and billions of years is not very significant...

Creation of the live on Earth I think, that the third and fourth days are probably switched, which I would consider as a redaction interference of either that one, who originally received and recorded that, or by those, who transcribed it? The people of the past times could hardly understand, that plants need the Solar light, and so the stars and Sun had to precede the origin of plants... Just, if the atmosphere before the plants have filled it by oxygen, was not transparent? Possibly also, that the biological live with DNA has already been created before the Solar system, and brought here later [4]? Gn2 7. And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. The dust of the ground means the elements - hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen and other - this is the "dust of the ground". (And by that it is emphasized, indirectly can be deduced, that probably can exist other beings, which are not from the dust of the ground - from the matter, but they are made up only from energies, or even other ones?). And without original creation of cells, the primitive carbohydrogen compounds could never get arranged such, as to arise proteins, DNA and cells. Arise/appearance of live on Earth is dated just after the Late heavy bombardment some 3.8 billion years ago, when many asteroids fell onto Earth, of which some brought here water and primitive aminoacids. But if such a complicated mechanism, by which by the means of DNA the cells build proteins - for which they already need membranes from proteins - could arise during few tens of millions of years at random, it could arise any time later again, and would not be similar to the former. By that for the following 4 billions of years could arise just one radically different type of cells (eucaryotic), where the DNA mechanism is almost the same, it means, that at random it could not happen during few tens of millions of years. And from most, that evolved here on Earth gradually, there remained alive descendants of prototypes. If that cellular mechanism has evolved gradually here on Earth, there would remain alive descendants of the prototypes. Either the first bacteries have been brought here by asteroids from another place [4] (where they formerly gradually evolved), or by another civilisation, either by mistake or purposely... The following evolution was also probably not that completelly random - that, how God (and his Spiritual helpers) have been creating the live, need not be in contradiction with the evolution, as was proved by Darwin - it is enough to suitably help the evolution time by time, similar as the gardener: Plant and patiently wait, how it grows, and possibly also by a good selection of otherwise random changes... The word Adam means also "Human" and also the Humanity in general.

Gn2 21. And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; 22. And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. I am not sure, but I think, that this can describe the origin of the Moon - the Moon (Luna) was this way extracted from the planet Earth - if it could originate from the collision with another proto-planet, but it contains only the minerals from the original Earth [5] and not from that proto-planet, with which the Earth collided, which has been determined by scientists from the isotopic composition of the minerals, brought from the Moon by Apollo crews (if they really brought them from the Moon), and this "hole" has been filled/closed (surely the Moon was not extracted from Pacific ocean, it's not that small). The word Adam means also "red glowing"... The Moon is very important for the live on Earth, mostly but not only for plants, for marine systems... Gn2 8. And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 9. And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. ... 15. And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. 16. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat... This Eden was probably the Clear Nature, primaeval forests and stepes. It already remains little of it, but the original cleannes is very hard to find anywhere... (Eden originally means "delightful" and East is a same word as "hereditary, ancient, prehistory") The most natural food of man are fruits. People started to eat meat after the "flood"... Gn3 6. And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. 7. And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. Here is a very useful information for us, that the humanization of the monkeys (that the human body was gradually developed from the monkey does not diminish the greatness of the God's plan with the humanity) and toward the origin of civilisation (the tree of knowledge) women led the men, owing to the need of clothing, it were not the men due to the need of tools and fights... That Adam and Eve means generally the men and women, that they were not the particular individuals, can be understood... But if it was said there such "clearly", it would be censored by then society... It is obvious, that the text was inspired, that the man priests by themselves with their then mentality would not write it this way... But the humanity lost this way the access to the Tree of Live - to the (almost) infinite live in rebirth in the dynamically-stable nature. Infinity is in rebirth, nothing static can last forever. (Only oscilating system is stable, but the static system, or unidirectionally moving, is before the fall...) And the natural and primitive humanity was perpetually and without much evolving reborn, just with the evolution of civilisation there came the risks of ends or advancement to other levels, but the evolution cannot be infinite... (At least from the point of view of primary comodities, if we will not set up complete recyclation of all and transition to the "eternal" energy from Sun or from hydrogen, the humanity (or the technical civilisation) heads for an unavoidable extinction. Where the humanity heads for Spiritually cannot be determined from our perspective, but sooner or later there must come some qualitative transition to a different level, when this current level will be completelly exhausted, in the good or bad...) The antiquity dogmas were appropriate for the antiquity level of knowledge. Now, as the civilisation matures, we are ready for better understanding, appropriate for our current level of knowledge. Also, as the civilisation has got the means to destroy this marvelous island in the universe, it needs to get more knowledge to avoid that, to bring responsibility and wisdom... Now, when this current Armageddon finishes, there should be approximately thousand years of (hopefully peaceful) live and evolution of the civilisation, before transfering to another level. The dogma, that the second coming of Christ, described in evangelii (and probably noted as 25 .. 30 centuries in J6,19) should be at the end of

apocalypse, may not be actually right? Are you sure, that former antique philosophers understood it correctly making the parallel between second coming in evangelii and between the revelation of John? (See another my document, which explains, what does mean the New Jerusalem, which will come, when people will understand, what does it mean...) The revelation may actually be describing an important milestone on the way, or rather a help for putting away one grave stumblingstone, that is on our way... Now, when the civilisation understands, that it is not living with a perspective of just few more tens of years, it must try to switch to an everlasting sustainability instead of evelasting progress, since the fossil energies we received are similar to an egg white to allow for the start of the civilisation, but not for its whole duration... And we are responsible for protecting the marvelous nature, which has been given to us as a gift, not to spoil it, but to preserve it for future generations...

References [1] - David F. Crawford, Curvature Cosmology, 2011 [2] - P.A.Semi - Topology of the curved space-time universe, 2014 http://semi.gurroa.cz/Msg2014/ [3] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_sphere [4] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia [5] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon#Formation

...

Topology of the curved space-time universe by P.A*.Semi, 2014-01-04 - 2014-02-05,2014-03-05, released 2014-03-21 on Tallbloke talkshop

Abstract We show that the instability in Einstein’s originally conceived hyper-spherical universe was only seeming, while it is a perfectly stable solution, once there is known the balance of weight and density and the condition of continuity of space, where the explanations of observations (most notably quantum mechanical explanation of redshift) were earlier conducted in Curvature Cosmology by David F.Crawford, while we disagree with few of his explanations. We refute the Big Bang theory as being non-physical, not needed to explain observations, while showing just some of its flaws... We also explain, how such a universe could initially evolve, and give some estimates on its actual size, as determined from the Hubble parameter. In the following chapter on gravitational acceleration we explain the cause of the gravitational acceleration and force from space curvature, as a centrifugal acceleration due to object's movement in time through the curved space-time (or the rotation of reference frame in the curved time), deducing the original formula for gravitational acceleration from the space-time curvature and angular velocity, and explaining free-fall, orbit and tides.

Topology of the curved space-time universe Since vacuum is a mere theoretical concept, and even IGM (inter-galactic medium) and inter-cluster medium all contain some matter, the curvature of space is always positive and due to a statistical isotropy, it closes to a hypersphere. For an idea of such a hypersphere, if you travel by 2πR in one direction, you come to the same place from the opposite direction (same as if you walked on the Earth surface), regardless if you start in x,y,z directions (hence, contrary to a simple Earth surface, the same happens when starting up...). The same geometry was originally proposed by A.Einstein [ref Einstein/wiki], but he was later convinced by Lemaitre, Friedman and Hubble to add Λ (lambda) to the equations for a negative pressure (the dark energy), which he later called the Biggest Blunder of his live (rhyming with a Big Bang probably not by a mere coincidence)... The dark energy Λ, or could be called an anti-energy, is in the equation used on the opposite side of matter than a normal energy - whereas even a little of matter is very much of energy (or very much of energy is equivalent with a little of matter, on the same side of curvature equations), then only a little of anti-energy (energy of vacuum) has same-but-opposite effect as a very much of matter... Also, this anti-energy, that should be a property of any space, was never detected, and is postulated together with a dark matter as something, that cannot be detected by a principle, so it cannot be disproved merely by not observing it anywhere... For a case of Inflation, at the time of this writing, wiki mentions expansion on the order 1078 at 10-32s. This leads to expansion to many millions of light-years from sub-Planck length, and the front-side of this expansion would have to move by many orders of magnitude faster than the speed of light?! This solution is really a blunder on more detailed inspection... So, returning to the original Einstein's solution:

R=

c

4  G 

Formula used in Einstein's universe (as presented in wiki/Einstein's_universe )

We use just a little different formula:



2 GM 3 c2 2 R= = r S3 , where r S3 = 2 c 8 G  3 and = N M H , where N is an average count of hydrogen atoms in m3 of IGM and MH is a mass of proton. R is a radius of curvature, which is also a radius of the hyperspheric universe... Left part of the formula of curvature radius is used by D.Crawford [ref CC2011], optimized from Friedman equations ¨ ˙ by setting =0 , R=0 (a static solution with no dark energy) . Right side we will calculate below. Here , R=0  is a density of IGM only, since galaxies do not contribute to overall curvature, when they are although admirable, but after all rare exceptions in volume (Fig.1). IGM contains approximatelly 1/5 .. 1/2 of the weight of the universe, while spanning >99% of it's volume. The difference of coefficient of 1/4 and 3/8 is only by a constant and is not that much large... Later we will see another formula for curvature radius (from a different source), where it would yield rather 3/4 at this place (but for an "outer" curvature?), which differs more, but still by a constant... The right part is an opposite relation, where a matter weight determines the size, which eliminates the need of

Curvature Pressure, offered by D.Crawford. Volume of hyperspheric universe (3D surface of a 4D hypersphere) : 2

2

3 2

2  3 c3

3

V =2  R =

3

3

8G 2  2 Mass of IGM, contained in hyperspheric universe: 3 2

23 2 c 3

M =V =

3 2

8 G 

1 2

rearranged as: −1 2

3 2

 =

8 G M 3 2

23 2 c3 and substituted into the original equation for R, gives:

R=

4 GM 2 2 GM = r S 3 , where r S 3= 2 2 c 3c 3

Getting mass into the curvature formula instead of density, it reveals a common 3-dimensional Schwarzchild radius rS3, multiplied by

2 (cca 0.212 rS3). 3

With the original Einstein's universe formula (using coefficient 1/4 instead of 3/8), the other side would be:

R=

rS 3 (cca 0.318 rS3) . In the case of formula, shown later, matching gravity acceleration near the Earth (using 

coefficient 3/4 instead of 3/8, and using centrifugal acceleration formula for gravity), the other side would be:

R=

rS3 (cca 0.106 rS3) . 3

Ratio of 3-sphere (4D hypersphere) surface volume (2π2R3) to 2-sphere (normal 3D sphere) volume (4/3πR3) is

3 , which looks somehow similar as the ratio of 3-dimensional Schwarzchild radius to curved universe radius 2

with the Crawford's coefficient 3/8... Will there be a different 4-dimensional Schwarzchild radius ? The curvature radius and total volume are constrained both by density and by mass of IGM, so collapse toward higher-density smaller-radius or toward lower-density bigger-radius is both protected by a constancy of mass of IGM. On the other side, the overall curvature radius and total volume of the universe can be modulated by galaxies, by absorbing or expeling mass into IGM - the matter in the IGM is recycled these ways... Instability, reminded to Einstein's version of the universe due to conversion of matter to energy or back, is groundless - in the IGM, the conversion between matter and energy is probably very rare and if it is not impossible, it can be ignored on large scales... Instability due to a bad choice of ρ value [ref. EiProblems] is also groundless. Since there is no boundary, there is also no center of mass, toward which the matter could collapse gravitationally, since if the galaxy distribution is almost isotropic, all galaxies and IGM have equal amount of other galaxies and IGM on all sides, so this can be considered a stable solution, which is probably much older than 13.8e9 years, postulated rather dogmatically by ΛCDM model (the age, originally calculated by 1 / H0 was not adjusted, when H0 was adjusted, so the age became rather a dogma than a result in ΛCDM model!). Even in our galaxy, some stars of (at least) second generation (for ex. BD +17° 3248, HE0107-5240) are estimated to be almost 14e9 years old... The topology is closed regardless, if the individual point-mass curvature geometry is hyperbolic or elliptic, same as in planar geometry, even many connected hyperbola segments may close to a deformed circle (Fig. 2, 2). The closure of the topology is a result of endlessness to a certain (circumference) distance and of the same sign of curvature at every place.

A sketch drawing of curved space-time, reduced by 2 dimensions, showing, why mostly only IGM contributes to overall space curvature. First line is IGM without galaxies. Second line shows two galaxies. Their space curvature reduces with distance and diminishes, while the omnipresent IGM curvature prevails in longer distances from galaxies...

Fig. 1 Another factor of stability is the continuity of the space. See Fig. 2. describing local inhomogenities. The space is so big, that the possible local inhomogenities cannot level off on the overall scale... 1. Homogenous isotropic space with constant curvature 2. Space with matter clumps (galaxies). 3. On the right there is a place with more dense IGM matter than average. The radius of curvature is smaller, and yet the volume is bigger than average, which tends to balance the matter condensation to some degree. Possibly it will condense to make a new galaxy... 4. On the right there is a place with less dense IGM matter. The radius of curvature is bigger, and yet the volume is smaller than average, which tends to balance the low density by decreased volume...

here index A means "Average" Fig. 2 --------------------------------The black-hole density shrinks with growing mass, and a black-hole of a mass of all universe would be even less dense than current IGM, and bigger than current radius of the universe. It could rather be said, that we are living inside a Schwarzchild radius of the universe... With current estimates of mass ratio of IGM to galaxies, it can be said, that even when before the galaxies formed, the space was smaller or equal to a black hole size of its mass... (A common notice of switching space and time axis inside a black-hole [ref. EiOnline] is a misuse of external solutions and incorrect coordinate system inside an event horizon and would need to be corrected... Another example of incorrectness of using an exterior solution for an interior is the seeming singularity at the center: for example the center 1mm of the Earth or central 2km of the Sun should have a black-hole geometry from Schwarzchild solution, but instead the gravitational acceleration there is almost negligible, while acceleration of the "left" part is balanced and canceled by the acceleration due to the "right" part - if the acceleration is proportional to the "slope" of the curvature, which at the center (turning point) is 0, or in the Newtonian model of gravity... In the model, where the gravity is proportional to the radius of curvature caused by density, in the center could be just the same gravitational acceleration as below the surface, if the density was same... So even an ordinary black-hole does not have any singularity at it's center. Simplifying an object to a point-mass is valid only outside it's boundary...) This universe geometry could not be reached by any type of Big Bang from a single place... It could also be said, how it all could start: At the beginning, the space was filled with sparse hydrogen atoms in thermal equilibrium without any density fluctuations, and was bigger than current universe - a very big black hole... The entropy was infinite, no chaos at all - the space was "dark and void" [ref Gn1]. Applying an acoustic wave to such a medium would create condensation nuclei, which would gravitationally collapse to form stars and galaxies (see wiki/Stellar_nursery, "triggered star formation", [ref ap040927], [ref ap990407], wiki/SSPSF_model, wiki/Jeans_instability, wiki/Galactic_spheroid, how can an acoustic wave in a hydrogen cloud cause a star formation). Such an acoustic wave would have a size of the universe, and a tone frequency on the size of separation of galaxies, and/or separation of stars. This started the "lights" - stars and galaxies. Further absorption of hydrogen from IGM into galaxies (divided "waters" of the sky from "waters" of the grounds) made mass of IGM smaller and the space contracted to its present size... If it could happen this way, it is one of proofs, that old

Hebrew were somehow "inspired" (while writing this solution in the first 10 rows of Genesis) by any entity, that could understand this, since they could not understand this by themselves, having no terms in their language to describe it or think about that. It is also a proof, that any entity, that could make an acoustic wave into equilibrium space, exists outside of that space... Consider, that the 2nd law of thermodynamics applies to thermodynamic processes (that an entropy of an isolated system can never decrease), and neither to the gravitational collapse nor to the stellar nucleo-synthesis and hightemperature IGM nuclear fission, which are not thermodynamic processes. Also consider, that the eternal universe would not collapse to black-holes - as you may see in the center of the Milky Way, only the nearest stars are captured by the central black-hole, and even those rather orbit it than fall in - a same statement, that planets in Solar system do not fall into Sun... Consider, that a continuous creation of matter, proposed for some static cosmological models, is a nonsense, and is not needed... --------------------------------Curvature redshift has been successfully explained by D.Crawford [ref. CC2011], due to light traveling over curved space-time getting less energy (due to geodesic focusing, it gradually changes cross-sectional area of the photon wave, then angular momentum and spin, which can be tolerated only for a finite time), when after some time the original photon splits into 3 new photons, 1 contains almost all energy of the original photon and the original direction, while the other 2, one to each side, are low-energy photons, which get absorbed by IGM plasma, further causing CMBR radiation from plasma electrons, which is predicted/calculated with a correct observed temperature. Hence, anisotropies of CMBR are explained by a minor anisotropy of IGM arround our galaxy. The lack of redshift inside the galaxy is explained by other processes in rather dense ISM (inter-stellar medium), competing with the curvature redshift process and so inhibiting it. The light-curves of Type Ia supernovae are explained by the fact, that not the peak magnitude, but the total energy of Type Ia supernova is constant, and so more dim ones shine longer, and also by an intentional selection of what is and what is not a Type Ia supernova. The observed temperature of IGM is also explained from the redshift process, with a correct temperature prediction. The rotation curve of galaxies is also explained in Curvature cosmology by D.Crawford (due to the IGM halo around the galaxy), but we offer another solution (which may combine with the explanation of D.Crawford) - galaxy cannot be simplified to a point mass in any way, and local attraction inside the spiral arms (by stars and by ISM) is bigger, than the central attraction, and so the galaxy rotates much more as a fixed object, than previously estimated by Keplerian orbit models. Consider, that in the Milky Way, the space curvature due to the central bulge at the distance of the Sun is estimated only 40% the amount of space curvature of local ISM gas of density 105 protons in m3 (or 1/30 with gas density 106), not even counting neighbour stars (see also wiki/Gravitationally_aligned_orbits). Thereby we eliminate the need for any mystical dark matter. The Lyman-alpha forest we also explain differently from [ref. CC2011] - the high-redshift quasars are very probably polar light-beams from accretion disks of black holes (the strongest known light-sources), and the light climbs from a strong gravitational field through regions with successively lower gravitational time dilation. For a super-massive black hole, if the region even few hundreds of AU from the source of the light could be filled with a molecular hydrogen, it would create Lyman-alpha forest just as observed (and such quasars would therefore be more near, than expected from their red-shifts...). The same could probably apply to "galaxies", observed by HST at very-high redshifts - the resolution of those images is quite far from the possibility to distinguish a galaxy from a heavy-point source... To measure the space curvature would need for ex. to measure angles of a triangle, which sum to more (or less) than π (180°), but the difference is very tiny and the triangle would have to be very large to detect anything. This would require to know exact positions of all three points, best if far from Solar system or Milky Way galaxy, which cause bigger curvature. The supposed measurement of WMAP with the angle and frequency of CMBR anisotropies is a deception, since they absolutely may not know the exact distance "there far away"! More even if the CMBR source is not that far anyway... (But there is an object "far away", whose distance "there" and our local angle is known - the light echo of V838 Mon outburst, just the distance from us toward there is not certain? You may also see on the V838 Mon image, what it is, which has been previously thought about as "dark matter" - there is a lot of matter in the interstellar space, which is not visible by itself, and yet it is an ordinary baryonic matter...)

Fig. 3 - V838 Mon outburst light echo, illuminating interstellar dust, that could have been thought of as a dark matter... (Publicly released images by NASA and STScI , Hubble space telescope, 2002-2006...)

D.Crawford shows these formulae for hubble constant and distance redshift:

H=

3c R

and

z =exp  3 −1 where α is an angle, travelled over the hyperspherical space, or the other side:

=

ln 1z  3

and distance is

D= R

The maximum angle α is 2π. CC states a maximum of π, since the object more far away would be visible on the other side more near to us. Maximum redshift for α=π would be 229.7, which would be 75-80 Gly away, which is by far more distant, than current observational possibilities and also it may be older (more far away) than the current age of universe, and also the light would be so redshifted, that it looses too much frequency and gets absorbed on the way...? D.Crawford offers an estimate on average density of IGM (the only parameter to the size of universe etc) as N = 1.55 ± 0.01 m-3 (average count of hydrogen atoms in 1 m3 of IGM plasma), which yields H = 64.4 ± 0.2 km s-1 Mpc-1, and R = 26.3 Gly from R=3.100∗10 26 N −1 /2 m ... Matching observations of H = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1 (ignoring more recent results from WMAP and Planck, which measure something else than H ), yields R = 24.2 Gly and N = 1.837 m-3 , while using H=62 km s-1 Mpc-1 yields R = 27.3 Gly and N = 1.44 m-3 ... The space outside of the universe black-hole could be described by a conventional Schwarzchild solution. [ref Schwarzchild] The most interesting feature, that could be guessed (from similarity with normal black holes [ref. Photon_sphere]) outside, is a photon-sphere at

3 r , the Sphere of Eternal Light, where the space is so curved, that the light 2 s

orbits in a circle. In a case of Kerr solution [ref. Kerr] of rotating universe (black-hole), there is a region instead of a single surface (and indeed, the universe rotates at least in the time dimension). Since the light moves at the speed of time (speed of light), it's proper time is 0 and its proper velocity is infinite, so it can experience the whole duration of the universe in one moment... Any existence of possible inteligent "energetic" Being inside this region cannot be proved or disproved from Earthly perspective... [Ref. Rev4, OES] What is "below" the surface of 4D hypersphere (inside) we cannot tell, but very probably it would be dark and cold... (if there is some "below surface"?) If there were "spiritual" beings above and below the hypersphere surface, we could not detect them, neither to prove nor disprove, by no 3D physical means... They probably can have some means to comunicate into our "surface" universe, if they could "inspire" writing of Gn1, and tell μάγοι about the Bethlehem star (the David Star in year 3BC was a planet configuration, which included all far planets including Neptune and Pluto, with Jupiter and Sun standing out from the "star" ("above" the star) - a configuration which could have been interpretted to mean "King God of Jews", but which the μάγοι absolutely could not "see" by themselves (and hence the story of 3 Kings is one of exact proofs of spiritual beings or "angels", beside Gn1 writing). It occured in May -2 (3 BC) both on Earth and Sun, being the best superposition of those two "stars" during the recent history. It again occured on Christmas (that with the Sun and Jupiter standing "above"), from Earth perspective only. Such a configuration happens time by time, by far the most exact configuration was in the year when Jews exiled to Babylon, at the end of Bar Kokhba revolt, it also happened, when David started rule, etc... If the Bethlehem (David) star was any phenomenon visible on the sky, or if it was visible directly above Bethlehem, they would have got no reason to go to ask into Jerusalem first... )

Gravitational acceleration Formula for calculating the radius of curvature in the vicinity of a point mass (far from it's Schwarzchild radius) is given by dr.M.Hendry in his lectures [ref Hendry2007] as



3

R c Rc = GM

2

where R is a distance from the object, M is it's mass, the other are common constants ("c" the speed of time and "G" the ratio of space curvature in response to mass - my own definitions...). For the case of Earth near it's surface, this value is 2.419e11 m (806.88 ls, circumference is 5069.8 ls), giving value of g = 9.7965 m / s2 later... See [ref Hendry2007] for deduction of this formula. (Simplifying an object to a point mass is valid only outside its boundary. Inside the object, one must consider, which parts of the object are on which side, so the interior solution would be more difficult, and would need to integrate over object's parts...) The R 3 /2 in the curvature formula strongly resembles hyperbolic curvature, and indeed, the "straight" line (a geodesic) through the space with this curvature (due to a single mass point), is similar to an (possibly inverse) hyperbola, and is longer than it would be in euclidean space. With sufficient curvature, two paralel lines arround each side of the object will meet behind the object (gravitational lensing). Indeed, if the otherwise empty universe was occupied by a single mass point, it would have a hyperbolic geometry. But same, as if you connect many sections of 2-dimensional hyperbolas, it forms a deformed circle (see Fig 2 above), the same is with a universe almost-isotropically filled by many massive points. And curved is not only the space, but the time also... The passage in time through the curved space-time (the passage of a "3D-stationary" object in time direction through the curved space-time) can be described by the angular velocity vector, and can cause a centrifugal acceleration, directed toward the center of mass:

C=2 Rc , T =

2  Rc , =2 /T c

gives an angular velocity vector with magnitude:

=



c GM = Rc R3

rad/s

in a direction perpendicular to the line from the place toward the central object, and perpendicular to the Time axis (which is not an exact specification in 4D space, but all vectors, that fulfil this condition, give the same result anyway...) For the case of Earth surface, the value is 0.0012393 rad/s. For a comparision, the Earth rotation has angular velocity 0.000072921 rad/s, which is 17 times smaller value, or 288.83 times smaller square value, which is also a difference between gravitational acceleration and centrifugal acceleration due to Earth spin... From the definition of centrifugal acceleration:

 ×  X R −× leads to a common known formula of gravitational acceleration: 2

g = R=R

GM c2 GM = 2 3 2 R c R

The observed acceleration in the rotating reference frame can be expressed by [ref. wiki/Fictitious_force]

  vB − ×  ×  xB  − d  × xB aB = aA − 2 × dt  vB is Coriolis acceleration where aA is the "physical" acceleration in a hypothetical inertial frame, −2 × due to movement relative to the reference frame B (if the only movement is in the time direction, then the reference frame moves same as the object, on which the fictitious forces apply, so here vB is 0), −×× xB  is a centrifugal acceleration known as gravity, and the last term is Euler acceleration due to change in

 , which is 

 . 0, unless the central mass changes, which also changes the curvature and hence the  The direction of the Coriolis acceleration due to movement

vB is not immediatelly clear, since the direction of

 is not well defined above, whereas the direction of centrifugal acceleration due to rotation with a centerward  curvature (there is more space "inside" then there should be in Euclidean model, so the curvature is actually centerward) is known centerward. The magnitude of Coriolis acceleration near Earth surface would be  (and smaller for non-perpendicular directions), for a 0.0024786∗∣v∣ for a movement perpendicular to  case of airplane flying 1000 km/h or 277m/s it would be 0.688498 m/s2 which is 14.2x smaller than gravitational  was actually equally in all directions perpendicular to the centerward direction acceleration... But if the vector  and curvature, it would cancel out the Coriolis effect...? Gravitational attraction between two objects can be explained: One object causes a spacetime curvature, which causes "time" acceleration of the second object toward the first. The force, caused by acceleration onto the second object is F 2=g 1 M 2 . The second object also causes a space curvature, which causes an acceleration of the first object. The force, caused by acceleration onto the first object is F 1=g 2 M 1 . By chance, they are same, but in opposite directions... (The curvatures, caused by both objects, add to the total curvature...) Falling and orbiting objects - in the inertial reference frame - are accelerating toward the center of mass. The difference in their trajectories (different ellipses or hyperbolas) is due to initial conditions (initial velocity). In the accelerated (rotating) reference frame of the falling object, the force due to centripetal acceleration is balanced by the fictitious centrifugal (inertial) force, so that no net acceleration remains. They are not moving straight along the space curvature, only the light and waves do... (consider, that the space curvature is intrinsic property of the curved space arround the central mass, and does not depend on the speed of moving object in normal range of (non-relativistic) velocities, so no orbiting object is moving along the space curvature, on a geodesic...) If there could be a small difference between centripetal acceleration and centrifugal force in the accelerated reference frame remains an open question here. If there is additional force applied to some part of the system (like rocket engines), the other parts (the rocket crew) feel the difference in acceleration of their reference system as their own centrifugal (fictitious) acceleration, while in inertial reference frame it is their moment of inertia, that resists the reference frame acceleration. A little intersting fact: As a coincidence, at the distance of the curvature radius due to Earth's gravity at the Earth surface, which is 806.88 ls, there is a planet Venus just at the time, when they form almost a Golden angle (137.508° or (1-φ)2π) arround the Sun (actually 137.56°, but only in one of 5 possible states, the value actually oscilates on range 136.1°-141.5° due to orbit elipticity), which is probably just an aesthetical coincidence... Tidal force is caused by adding centrifugal force due to the objects orbiting the common center of mass (the place with a least torque of the system... the centrifugal force is shown on Fig. 4 as green arrows) - which is same over all the body, and the gravitational force caused by the second body, which differs with distance from the body. In the rotating (orbiting) reference frame of the planet the fictitious centrifugal force may have very real and observable consequences. In the inertial reference frame, that what is observed as centrifugal force is the object's inertial moment to move the original way, while it is forced by centripetal force to turn. Due to the possible difference in centrifugal force and centripetal force, which may exist due to the orbit elipticity and possible other influences, such tidal force can be little asymmetric... In wikipedia, there is an alternative explanation of the tidal force, that on a rather solid body it is caused by subtracting the average gravitational acceleration on the body (same as acceleration at the center) from the local acceleration, differing due to the field gradient with distance from the body. On a rather gaseous body with a little own gravitational cohesiveness (for ex. a comet halo), where the body center would have got almost no influence on the body sides, only the field gradient would exist then... Such a tidal force is calculated as exactly symetric.

Fig. 4 - Tidal force explained. Top - red arrows are gravitational field, green are centrifugal force. Bottom - added.

Fig. 5 Tidal force on Earth due to Moon only, view from above north pole, moon little above equator. Arrow points toward moon. Brown vectors are pointing outside, blue vectors are pointing inside.

Discussion I still doubt, if this second part (about gravity) is correct... Anyway, it should not influence the first part, which is only little related to the second one. This work presents various aspects for further thought and investigations, presents more concurrent ways to calculate space curvature from different sources (similar, differing only by a constant). While learning tensor math, I found, that it hardly can be used to really practically calculate space curvature yet, and indeed, the numerical relativity is currently very limited in its scope... Both this solution, and tensor math solutions, are too much simplifying rather complicated reality... This work intentionally excludes more complicated space curvatures due to multipoles (which cause deviations from the simple gM1M2 / r2 gravity relation), leaving this topic for a further research... It is also possible, that the centrifugal attraction toward center of curvature is due to yet another space rotation in some higher dimension, but it fits with the rotation in speed of time / light c...

References CC2011 - Curvature Cosmology, David F. Crawford 2011 - http://arxiv.org/pdf/1009.0953.pdf (md5 4934c268d75d7cf5d08a3bb62b356665 cached) and http://www.davidcrawford.bigpondhosting.com/ Gn1 - Genesis 1, 1-10 Rev4 - Revelation 4 ap040927 - Astronomy picture of the Day - http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap040927.html ap990407 - Astronomy picture of the Day - http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap990407.html Hendry2007 - An Introduction to General Relativity, Gravitational Waves and Detection Principles, Dr Martin Hendry, University of Glasgow, UK, http://star-www.st-and.ac.uk/~hz4/gr/hendry_GRwaves.pdf (md5 8d91a7638aaf7d0f51150481ae59896a cached) Kerr - Kerr metric - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_black_hole Photon_sphere - Black hole - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#Photon_sphere Schwarzchild - Schwarzschild metric - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_metric and http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Schwarzchild_radius Einstein/wiki - Einstein's universe - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein's_universe NOAA-tides - NOAA Tides and currents - http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/restles3.html EiOnline - Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics - http://www.einsteinonline.info/spotlights/changing_places EiProblems - http://universeinproblems.com/index.php/Static_Einstein's_Universe -------------------Related texts are located at http://semi.gurroa.cz/Msg2014/ , redaction and english translation is pending...

...

David (Bethlehem) star P.A.Semi, 2014-02-12 (Author's translation from Czech original) Planet configuration of David Star happens time by time... We list here the most bold occurences in antiquity period, with the center on Earth or on Sun, sorted chronologically, and various events, that happened approximately in those times. The most precise David star happened in the year 586 BC, when the jews left to the Babylonian capture. Other bold ones have been for example when king David started rule, when building the Jerusalem temple, when the Kingdom of Judah was established after split of the united monarchy, by the end of Bar Kokhba revolt and others... The biggest area below the curve, and also the best simultaneity of this star on Earth and on Sun, happened on the year 3 BC. At the autumn 3 BC there was the only found occurence of that star arround Sun, in which there were included all the planets. Just before christmass 3 BC there was the David star with out-standing Sun, Jupiter and Mercury, the sign, which could justly be considered by the μάγοί from the east as the sign of the birth of Godly and magic king of Israel. If the Bethlehem star was some visible phenomenon on the sky or on the ground above Bethlehem, they would have got no reason to go asking Herod in Jerusalem first. They came to ask there, because their "stars" told them generally in the symbolic level, and so they came to ask about the particular place, which was then read out from the manuscripts. Although this does not prove, that Jesus was really born on this date (although it is probable), it proves another very interesting thing - the existence of angels or other spiritual beings, that could reveal it onto them - because in this "star" there are included all the planets including Neptune and Pluto, which neither astrologers of those times nor of the following many centuries could not "see" by their technical means. I absolutelly do not think, that the mentioned events happened because of some planetary constelations, rather they have been probably set up in time on the occasion of these constelations. After all, the most important word of the Old Testament is ‫ עד‬- AD - the Witness (in the classical hebrew edition this word is the only one printed in double size letters). Similarity with the christian label A.D. is probably clearly random... Planets, not used in the Star (marked as "standing out"), seem to specify its character. On the following "maps" of planets, the central lines (in the color of the planet) are drawn always, and the grey lines between planets are only in the case, that there is an aspect (trine, sextile, opposition, conjunction, quadrature, quintile, biquintile or the golden angle) more precise then 1°, and a bold line if it is more precise than 0.5°. This text is intentionally rather brief and constricts to one aspect, which can be logically deduced and probably also proved, but it could be a key, which could open the door, so that the reason will not be in opposition to belief and spiritual insight, so that they can reciprocally support each other against unconcern...

15.4.1066 BC Center - Sun Maximum - 821.5 Standing out - Earth,Sat,Nep

JD 1332171.48541 12.1.1006 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 135.0 Ln-surface - 100.55 Standing out - Sun,Moon,(Ven,Ura,)

Start of the rule of king David.

JD 1353991.63360

10.6.0935 Center - Earth Maximum - 452.87 Ln-surface - 29.73 Standing out - Sun,Jup,Mars,Ura

Possible start of construction of the Jerusalem temple, before the end of rule of the king Salomon ???

JD 1380074.64880 26.6.0929 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 323 Ln-surface - 36.45 Standing out - Sun,Jup,Mars,Ura

Establishment of the Kingdom of Judah after split of the united monarchy.

JD 1382283.32500

11.11.0687 BC Center - Sun Maximum - 1657.5 Standing out - Sat,Ura(,Ven)

King Manasseh starts to rule (he re-instituted pagan worship)

JD 1470810.93563 16.10.0669 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 1675.8 Ln-surface - 27.78 Standing out - Sun,Nep,Mer,Mars

Manasseh fights side by side with Assyria (Ashurbanipal)

JD 1477359.92618

12.9.0586 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 4501.4 Ln-surface - 40.39 Standing out - Sun,Ven,Nep,Plu (absolutely most precise David star)

Destruction of the first Temple, Babylonian capture of the Jews

JD 1507641.17580 20.5.0439 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 214.7 Ln-surface - 97.25 Standing out - Mer,Mars(,Ura,Sun)

Finished construction of the Parthenon, located on Athens' Acropolis? Democritus discoveres atoms...?

JD 1561217.57839

1.4.0350 BC Center - Sun Maximum - 755.09 Standing out - Earth,Ven,Plu

Aristoteles discoveres sphericity of the Earth, Plato proposes the geocentric model...

JD 1593676.31540 12.10.0032 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 83.49 Ln-surface - 158.84 Standing out - Sun,Mer,Mars,Nep

???

JD 1710019.85776

5.5.0003 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 23.58 Ln-surface - 259.98 Standing out - Mer,Ven(,Mars,Sat)

JD 1720452.21353 5.5.0003 BC Center - Sun Maximum - 37.84 Standing out - Mars(,Ven,Earth)

JD 1720452.42841

13.7.0003 BC Center - Sun Maximum - 51.78 Standing out - (Ven,Mars,Nep) The only one found, which contains all the planets...

JD 1720521.27906 19.7.0003 BC Center - Sun Maximum - 99.19 Standing out - Mer(,Sat,Ear)

JD 1720527.44876

23.12.0003 BC Center - Earth Maximum - 42.69 Ln-surface - 259.98 Standing out - Sun,Jup,Mer(,Ura)

Bethlehem star, probable date of birth of Jesus Christ...

JD 1720683.71474 26.5.0058 Center - Earth Maximum - 363.33 Ln-surface - 243.25 Standing out - Ven,Ura(,Mer,Sun)

???

JD 1742387.72686

11.7.0136 Center - Earth Maximum - 420.91 Ln-surface - 61.31 Standing out - Mer,Ven,Mars,Plu

End of Bar Kokhba revolt (Definitive) end of jews in Israel, burning of texts, slaying of sages...

JD 1770924.04193 8.9.0166 Center - Earth Maximum - 328.69 Ln-surface - 247.93 Standing out - Mer,Moon(,Ven,Sun)

??? Roman envoy in China, defeated Armenia and Mesopotamia became Roman colonies ???

JD 1781940.17926

8.1.0738 Center - Sun Maximum - 371.90 Standing out - Ven,Mars,Sat

???

JD 1990619.70169

Mathematical definition Mathematical function for searching the David stars in the planet configurations arround the center C at time t is defined such, the when placing one planet to the apex of the star, the function returns inverse of the sum of squares of differences (in radians) of the nearest planet from the respective apex of the star. That combination (first apex) is selected, which gives the maximal value. Maximum = =

1 1 =  C t ∑ 2 ∀  ]

Ln-surface below the curve is defined as a sum of daily values of the natural logarithm of the square roots of the noon value of 1/ C t (inverted David star difference), or possibly the maximal value of that day, if there is a local maximum of the function in this day, during the period, when this logarithm is positive.

LnSurface = =

∫ ln day +



1  C t

Owing to the displayed period, all dates are marked in the proleptic julian calendary (in the table near the end there is used the Gregorian calendary after the year 1582). For the case of uncertainty there is marked also the JD(Julian Day) value. If there is a contradiction of the JD and date, the JD value is more precise...

Function of the square root of the "value" of the David star in the recent history. Green color is for the center on Earth, orange for the center on Sun. On this image, the maximum values are visible.

Integrated surface below the curve of the natural logarithm of the square roots, only for the Earth...

This chart and the following are showing the value of the natural logarithm of the square roots of the function of the David star on Earth (green), on Sun (orange) and their multiplication product (blue). On the year 3 BC (year -2) there was not only the biggest area below the curve for the center on Earth, but also (probably) the biggest area below the curve of their multiplication...

(One of examples of less distinct cases of the area below the curve, shown for comparison...)

Maximum of the product on May 1937, one local maximum of the Earthly value by the end of November 1941, one local maximum by the end of July 1945 on the Sun, one maximum on the Earth just after the end of February 1948, all of them not much bold...

Table of occurences of the most bold David stars, sorted by the area below the curve (with a value >150, for the last 3000 years) Center of period and integral of the values

Interval of dates (JD)

Interval of dates

JD 1720483=259.981

1720200 .. 1720766

cca 08/0003 BC .. 03/0001 BC

JD 1782063=247.934

1781769 .. 1782358

21.03.0166 20:02:31 .. 31.10.0167

JD 1742342=243.251

1742051 .. 1742634

23.06.0057 .. 27.01.0059

JD 1709652=242.166

1709360 .. 1709944

cca 12/0033 BC .. 07/0031 BC

JD 1795423=235.172

1795116 .. 1795731

05.10.0202 .. 11.06.0204

JD 1672309=234.604

1671829 .. 1672790

cca 03/0135 BC .. 11/0133 BC

JD 2428666=229.792

2428400 .. 2428933

19.08.1936 .. 03.02.1938

JD 2087838=228.344

2087532 .. 2088145

09.05.1003 .. 11.01.1005

JD 1645510=225.434

1645067 .. 1645953

cca 12/0209 BC .. 05/0206 BC

JD 1715832=221.631

1715564 .. 1716101

cca 12/0016 BC .. 06/0014 BC

JD 1533459=219.792

1533020 .. 1533898

cca 03/0515 BC .. 08/0513 BC

JD 1722810=219.521

1722503 .. 1723118

16.12.0003 .. 22.08.0005

JD 1803946=212.737

1803652 .. 1804240

17.02.0226 .. 28.09.0227

JD 1433322=207.043

1432815 .. 1433830

cca 11/0790 BC .. 08/0787 BC

JD 1856196=203.990

1855919 .. 1856474

25.03.0369 .. 01.10.0370

JD 2351494=201.188

2351195 .. 2351793

02.04.1725 .. 21.11.1726

JD 1495955=200.393

1495530 .. 1496380

cca 07/0618 BC .. 11/0616 BC

JD 1546615=196.839

1546176 .. 1547055

cca 03/0479 BC .. 08/0477 BC

JD 1918683=195.959

1918406 .. 1918961

23.04.0540 .. 30.10.0541

JD 1410198=194.288

1409773 .. 1410624

cca 10/0853 BC .. 01/0850 BC

JD 1919376=193.543

1919112 .. 1919640

30.03.0542 .. 09.09.0543

JD 2336723=191.785

2336411 .. 2337036

09.10.1684 .. 26.06.1686

JD 2377946=186.078

2377637 .. 2378255

24.08.1797 .. 04.05.1799

JD 1924860=185.964

1924582 .. 1925139

21.03.0557 .. 29.09.0558

JD 1669834=185.371

1669553 .. 1670115

cca 12/0142 BC .. 07/0140 BC

JD 2037250=184.396

2036913 .. 2037587

06.10.0864 .. 11.08.0866

JD 1925650=183.960

1925369 .. 1925931

17.05.0559 .. 29.11.0560

JD 2124555=183.835

2124229 .. 2124881

28.10.1103 .. 10.08.1105

JD 1351495=182.013

1351133 .. 1351858

cca 03/1013 BC .. 03/1011 BC

JD 1405465=177.023

1405196 .. 1405734

cca 03/0865 BC .. 09/0864 BC

JD 2467642=175.503

2467320 .. 2467964

11.03.2043 .. 14.12.2044

JD 2004410=172.451

2004159 .. 2004662

02.02.0775 .. 19.06.0776

JD 1938892=170.943

1938622 .. 1939163

30.08.0595 .. 20.02.0597

JD 2187666=167.282

2187374 .. 2187959

14.09.1276 .. 22.04.1278

JD 1499044=166.709

1498778 .. 1499311

cca 06/0609 BC .. 11/0608 BC

JD 1524702=166.183

1524409 .. 1524996

cca 08/0539 BC .. 03/0537 BC

JD 2293697=164.860

2293385 .. 2294009

12.12.1566 .. 27.08.1568

JD 2476356=163.811

2476004 .. 2476708

19.12.2066 .. 22.11.2068

JD 2424057=163.101

2423764 .. 2424350

10.12.1923 .. 18.07.1925

JD 1775210=162.382

1774916 .. 1775504

16.06.0147 .. 24.01.0149

JD 2144007=161.177

2143753 .. 2144261

11.04.1157 .. 01.09.1158

JD 1548178=160.735

1547913 .. 1548444

cca 12/0475 BC .. 05/0473 BC

JD 1408539=159.795

1408285 .. 1408793

cca 09/0857 BC .. 01/0855 BC

JD 2206440=159.370

2206193 .. 2206688

24.03.1328 .. 01.08.1329

JD 2102734=158.987

2102471 .. 2102997

02.04.1044 .. 10.09.1045

JD 1710318=158.837

1710057 .. 1710579

cca 11/0031 BC .. 04/0029 BC

JD 1906845=157.591

1906538 .. 1907152

26.10.0507 .. 01.07.0509

JD 2192376=157.543

2192070 .. 2192683

24.07.1289 .. 29.03.1291

JD 1597248=156.354

1596985 .. 1597511

cca 04/0340 BC .. 10/0339 BC

JD 1781369=156.320

1781092 .. 1781647

13.05.0164 .. 19.11.0165

JD 1808606=154.716

1808279 .. 1808933

19.10.0238 .. 03.08.0240

JD 1427338=154.618

1427041 .. 1427635

cca 01/0805 BC .. 08/0804 BC

JD 2362393=153.968

2362125 .. 2362661

06.03.1755 .. 23.08.1756

JD 2143252=152.931

2142960 .. 2143545

09.02.1155 .. 15.09.1156

JD 1397548=152.707

1397284 .. 1397812

cca 07/0887 BC .. 01/0885 BC

JD 1475580=150.876

1475303 .. 1475857

cca 03/0673 BC .. 09/0672 BC

References For finding the positions of planets, the JPL ephemerides DE422 are used. Events for the dates are adopted from english wikipedia, possible difference probably should not exceed the uncertainty in dating that event...

...

Klíč ke zprávě pro 7 církví v Janově Zjevení: cca 2012

Církev Efezská je Evropa. - Mikulášeňci (Nikolaité) jsou obecně ti, kteří tvrdí, že ostatní lžou. Případně ti, kteří tvrdí, že na smilstvu a hříších nezáleží... Církev Smyrnenská jsou Muslimové. Církev Pergamenská jsou Křesťanské církve. - Antipas jsou ti, co bojují "proti slovutným"(?) - např. Jan Hus, možná i Galileo, ale i další... - Kdo je Balám zatím nevím... (ale možná to jsou ti, co šíří falešné učení? viz i podle Jezábel dále...) Církev Tyatirská je hnutí New Age a "Léčitelé" atd... - Jezábel jsou falešní mystici, astrologové atd. - Hvězda Jitřní je znamení nového úsvitu. Církev Sardinská jsou Židé. Církev Filadelfská jsou Američané. (toto přiřazení bylo nejjednodušší...) Církev Laodicejská znamená "Lidi jmenující" (tedy Humanismus), ale i vědci a ateisti... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(Interpretace, že se jedná o tehdejší konkrétní města v dnešním Turecku, je povrchní a naivní...) Trochu podrobněji s pravděpodobnou etymologií jmen: 2014-02-22

Církev Efezská ( ‫( אפסי־ארץ‬efesei erec) konec země?? ) je Evropa. - Mikulášeňci (Nikolaité) jsou obecně ti, kteří tvrdí, že "ti ostatní" lžou. (Podle jiného výkladu to jsou ti, kteří se snaží pomocí "kontroly spirituální hierarchie ovládat vývoj obyčejných lidí", a nebo/i ti, kteří páchají smilstvo a hříchy a tvrdí, že to nevadí.) Nicméně zkratka Ni-Co-... je i NiceneConstantinople, a to zejména v té původní podobě z roku 325 s prokletím odpůrců na konci... (A také ‫( נכל‬nkl) jednati zlovolně/potměšile, nastrojit nástrahy, smluvit se, nebo ‫ק!יון‬#‫( נ‬nikaión) beztrestnost..., nebo ‫לא‬ (nikaión la) nevinný není ?) Církev Smyrnenská ( ‫יר‬#‫( ש!מ‬šámir) trní/diamant, ‫ שמר‬ostražitý,

‫נקיון‬

‫ים‬#‫( נ!ע‬náim) roztomilý ?? ) jsou Muslimové.

Církev Pergamenská ( ‫( פער‬per) dokořán_otvírat ‫( ג׳מא‬gma) papyrus, ale i Pergamen ) jsou Křesťanské církve. - Antipas (z latiny/řečtiny) jsou ti, co bojují "proti slovutným"(?) - Jan Hus, Kataři, možná i Galileo, ale i další... (‫מת‬.‫( א‬emet) věrný ‫( פעה‬pah) nahlas naříkat, ‫( פשע‬pša) odpadlík, ‫ש‬0‫( פ‬paš) zpupnost ? případně i ‫( אנתה‬anta) "ty") - Kdo je Balaám zatím nevím jistě... (ale možná to jsou ti, co šíří falešné učení? viz i podle Jezábel dále...) Volný překlad smyslu jmen v Zj2,14 by byl: "Hltající/Pomatený (lid) (‫עם‬

‫ בלע‬bla am) učí Zbídačeného/Zpustošeného ( ‫ק‬0‫ ב!ל‬balak) klást pohoršení před Boží Bojovníky" ( Balaám případně ‫ם‬0‫ ב!ל‬brzdit/krotit, případně ‫" בל עם‬není z lidu" (původní výklad) ... ) tedy: Nenasytné hromadění bohatství je trnem v oku chudým lidem, kteří se proto odvracejí od víry. nebo/i: Zmatená nauka je trnem v oku... ? Spíš asi ne... (starozákonní Balaám neučil Baláka, naopak se vzepřel kladení pohoršení...) Církev Tyatirská ( ‫ירוש‬#‫ת‬

‫ו!ה‬5‫א‬0‫( ת‬táráh tiróš) toužit mladé_víno ??) je hnutí New Age a "Léčitelé" atd...

- Jezábel ( ‫ז!בול‬7‫( ע‬jizából) tržiště) jsou falešní mystici, astrologové atd. - Hvězda Jitřní je znamení nového úsvitu. (Ale jitřenka má stejný význam jako ‫" שחר‬usilovně hledat" nebo i

‫" הילל‬lucifer", ‫ כוכב‬hvězda je i "mesiáš" nebo "Boží vševědoucnost (omniscience)" ) Církev Sardinská ( ‫ין‬#‫( ס!ר ד‬sar din) odchýlit_se,právo, Σάρδεις - ‫( ס!ר‬sar) odchýlit_se, Deo z latiny nebo ‫( דע!ה‬deáh) poznání) jsou Židé. (a vskutku v tomto nacistickém a rasistickém státě zbylo i pár upřímných spravedlivých, ale jsou v menšině... A další dva odkazy k židům jsou v jiných kapitolách, viz... Kde máte své Chasidské

‫ים‬#‫דיק‬0‫צ‬

?!)

Církev Filadelfská jsou Američané. (toto přiřazení bylo nejjednodušší, viz Philadelphia 1787 Constitution...) ("Drž se toho, co máš, aby nikdo nevzal koruny tvé" - ovšem nedrželi se, a koruna "toho Spravedlivého" jim již byla (téměř) odňata.) (Jestli mohl Jan vědět tuhle souvislost (Philadelphia) před 2 tisíci lety? Jako prorok mohl...) (Také, Φιλαδέλφεια - φιλάω (líbat), Δελφοί Delphi je domovem Πύθων (Python) draka...) (Podle jiného výkladu - duchovnějšího, je Philadelphia "Zrození Bratrské Lásky". Nicméně ani ve slovníku ani v realitě pro to zatím nemohu najít žádnou podporu...) Církev Laodicejská znamená "Lidi jmenující/omlouvající" (z řečtiny a latiny λαός (laos) dicere nebo δικαιολογώ (dikaiologo) omlouvat, nebo δίκαιος (dikaios) spravedlivý, nebo ‫( לאום‬leóm) lidé ‫ק‬0‫( ד‬dák) hluchý/vyhublý/jemný) - tedy Humanismus, ale i vědci a ateisti... Mimochodem, etymologie slova Patmos by mohla být i ‫מוש‬

‫ פת‬- (pat móš) tajná_část cítit.

V "Asii" - kromě řeckého původu, ‫( עשיאל‬asi-el) je "stvořeno Bohem", podobnější zápis jsem nenašel... (Podotýkám, že k těmto přiřazením jsem došel ještě dříve, než jsem našel hebrejský slovník, který mi pouze potvrdil předchozí vizi...) Pokud byste, křesťané, nechtěli připustit, že církev ve Smyrně jsou Muslimové se svou spravedlivou vírou, tak další kandidát na tuto pozici by logicky bylo Rusko, ale tam těch deset let utrpení nesouhlasí časově, a problém s tou špatnou synagogou nesouhlasí místně - myslím, že Rusko je zde zařazeno do Evropy, kam již teď patří i přes to, že by se neměla nechat Malá Rus vykrást neférovou asociací s Evropou (nebo neférovou půjčkou od bankéřů mmf). Pokud by se Jan obracel pouze na západní Eurasii, pak by Philadelphská církev byla Rusko. 2014-03-01

A další jména: Euro-Majdan, který by se v některých starých jazycích (staročeština, latina) mohl psát i Evro-Magdan a takto přepsán do hebrejštiny by byl ‫( עורמגדן‬Aur Mgdn nebo Eur Mgdn) což je skoro jako Armageddon (zápis Zj je pouze v řečtině, ale Jan byl žid nebo Aramejec, takže významům jmen mohl rozumět přes "svůj jazyk"... Dřívější

‫ הר מגידו‬Har Megiddo, ale to jsou dnes bezvýznamné ruiny) ... Další pravděpodobná etymologie: ‫ר!ם‬5‫( א‬Aram) - Sýrie, ‫דעון‬#‫( ג‬gideón) ničitel/tesař/drvoštěp, od kořene ‫( גדע‬osekat, interpretace tohoto jména byla

posekat, zlomit). Je mezi Sýrií a Euro-Majdanem mnoho společného: Amerikou a západní Evropou podporovaní (a IDF nebo wahabbisty vedení) teroristé bojují proti demokratické vládě, za mocného lhaní a zkreslování pomocí médií (Zj16,13-14)... "Stalo se" (Zj16,17) by se zapsalo ‫ד‬0‫י ע‬#‫( יה‬Jehi ád), je tam snad podobnost s Jihád? Zřejmě ne... Další význam těchto slov je "Svědek Boha" nebo "Důkaz Boha" nebo "Buď Svědek", a to se stalo letos (2014) na 3 krále... (Vždy jsem myslel, že Armageddon je spíše duchovní záležitost, která se již delší dobu děje, a tato případná konkrétní souvislost mě velmi překvapila... Samozřejmě to může být i omyl...) Zj.17,5 "Tajemství, Babylon veliký, mátě smilstva a ohavností země" - Tajemství ‫!ה‬ ‫ל=מ‬5‫ע‬0‫( ת‬táalůmá) a Babylon -

‫למוד בבלי‬0‫( ת‬talemůd báblí) možná není úplně náhodná. V Hebr.New.Test. Delitzsch je ovšem místo toho pro původní μυστηριον (mysterion) použito slovo ‫( סוד‬sód) záhada, zpověď, zpovědní tajemství, rada (angl. council)... ‫( שפר‬sefer) velkolepý (skoro jako ‫( ספר‬sefer) Kniha) nebo ‫( ג!דול‬gádól) velký? podobnost s Talmud Babylonský

Zbytek mi zatím nic konkrétního nepřipomíná, spíš to asi bude mít význam, jak to zní v překladu... Případně:

‫( אם זנות‬Em/Am Zenut) nebo ‫ר!ה‬5‫נע‬0 ‫( אם‬Am Naarah, matka děvky - angl. maiden), Ohavnost ‫תועב!ה‬ (Tóejbau/Toébáh) (že by Θῆβαι Thēbai (město Thebes Théby), původně Waset, ‫( נא אמון‬nō-āmôn) ?? asi ne... ), země ‫( ארץ‬Erec). [V Hebr.N.T. Delitzsch je místo toho ‫!ה‬ ‫ד!מ‬5‫בות ה!א‬5‫נות ותוע‬J‫ז‬0‫( אם ה‬em há zonót v toejbót há Matka smilstva

Pouze místo Erec (Země, území) použili Adam (lidstvo), v řečtině je γης (ges) "soil, by extension a region or the solid part of the whole of the terrene globe (including the occupants in each application); Earth" jako Geo... ] S tím Erec na konci to zní jako Am-(smilstvo a ohavnost)-Erec, ale to je již jen náhoda ... adamáh)...

(Zj.17) Šelma ‫ץ‬0‫ח‬0‫( ש‬šáchác), Propast ‫( תהום‬tehóm, αβυσσος abyssos) ? Toto zřejmě již nejsou jména, ale obrazy... (Hebr.N.T. Delitzsch má ‫!ה‬ ‫י‬0‫ח‬

(chájáh) živočich, zvíře, oživnout, orig.

bestial man, savage", propast mají stejně...). Slovo Šachovnice

‫ץ‬0‫ח‬0‫( ש‬šáchác) by šlo rozložit jako ‫( שח‬šach) a ‫( עץ‬ec) dřevo.

‫ לוח שחמט‬- loch šachmat, šachová deska), ale určitá podobnost tu je a není náhodná... ‫( שח‬šach, přemýšlení) a ‫( אט‬át) zvolna, jemný, mírumilovný (gentleness) by též bylo

se sice řekne jinak (

Jáma ‫ט‬0‫ח‬0‫( ש‬šáchát) (Zj20,3), od správné řešení...

θηριον (theirion) "animal, wild beast, metaph. a brutal,

2014-03-06..11

12 drahokamů v Zj.21, základ Nového Jeruzaléma: (který může přijít, až ho lidé pochopí...) 1

Jaspis - ‫ם‬J‫ל‬5 ‫ה‬0‫( י‬Jahalóm) - ‫( יה‬Jah) Bůh, ‫( למד‬Lmd) učedník, učit se, ‫( אלם‬elem) němý, ‫( עלם‬elem) tajuplný,

netečný,‫ים‬#‫לומ‬0‫( ע‬alůmim) dospívání, vyspělost, mladistvá svěžest, ‫( עלום‬alum) mládí, síla (angl. vigour) 2

Safír - ‫יר‬#‫פ‬0‫( ס‬Sáfir) - ‫( ספר‬Sefer) Kniha, ‫ר‬0‫( ס!פ‬Sáfár) vyprávět, ‫ ספר‬znalec, počítat, ...

3

Chalcedon - ‫( כלקדון‬Klqdon) - ‫יל‬# ‫( כ!ל‬Kálil) celek, dokonalost, ‫( ק!דוש‬Kádoš) svatý, ‫ים‬#‫( קדומ‬Kedůmim) prastarý, ‫קדם‬

(Kedem) odvěký, ‫( קדמ!ה‬kadamáh) předešlý, dřívější, ‫( דון‬don) jako ‫( דין‬din) soudce, obhájce, zastávat se, právo 4

Smaragd - ‫( ב!רקת‬Bareket) - ‫( בר!כ!ה‬Berakah) požehnání, ‫( ב!ר!ק‬baurak) blesk (angl. lightning)

5

Sardonyx - (Sard)Onyx - ‫( אוניקס‬Aoniks, moderní hebr.) - ‫( און‬Aon) usilování, tvůrčí síla, nebo i marnivost, ‫יקץ‬

(iaukac) probudit, ‫( יקש‬iaukoš) návnada, lovec, Onyx - ‫( י!שפה‬jaušefai), ‫( ישע‬išá) osvobodit, spasení, ‫( פה‬peh) ústa i ústí, ‫( פה‬ph) sem, zde, Sard: ‫( ס!ר!ה‬Sarah) odpadnutí, ‫ר‬0‫ע‬0‫( ש‬šáár), mnoho významů, zejména brána, např. i bouře, uznávati, ‫ס!ר‬ (Sár) odchýlit se ... 6

Karneol/Sardius (Carnelian) - ‫ם‬0‫ה‬J‫( ש‬šóhám) - ‫( שוה‬šóh) být stejný, přiměřený, blažiti, poskytnout pomoc, ‫ם‬0‫( ע‬ám)

příbuzný, lidé, národ, ‫( אם‬em) matka. (tedy pomož bližním) Carnelian ‫( קרנליאן‬krnlian - moderní hebr.) ‫( קרן‬krn) roh, vrchol, paprsek světla, ‫( ל‬le) ke, ‫( יעני‬iauani) "komu Bůh odpovídá", ‫וי!ה‬# ‫( ל‬livjau) věnec, fig. instrukcí rodičů, dílo moudrosti, ‫( יונ!ה‬jónau) holubice Carnelian je také ‫( אדם‬Adam) Adam, červený. 7

Chrysolit - ‫טד!ה‬#‫( פ‬pitedáh) - .‫( פתואל‬pitů-el) - zření Boha (vision of God) od ‫( פתה‬pth) otevřená mysl, ale i podvést,

nalákat, přivábit, ‫( דע!ה‬deáh) poznání, ‫( פת‬pat) tajná část, kousek, (pót) nahota Peridot (Chrysolite) - ‫( פרידוט‬peridot, moderní hebr.) - ‫( פרי‬peri) ovoce, plody, plod života, děti, potomci,

‫ת‬0‫ע‬0‫( ד‬dáth) poznání, ‫( דוד‬dód) něha, laskání, strýc (tedy "zření poznání", "ovoce poznání", nebo "milujte děti" ?) 8

Beryl - ‫( אקד!ח‬eqedách) - ‫( עקה‬eqh) tíha, úzkost, ‫( קדח‬qaudach) vzplanout (emoce) i zapálit (oheň), vznítit. ‫( אך‬ak)

jistě, určitě, zajisté, ‫( עקד‬akod) spoutat, svázat, pruhovaný, ‫( אכד‬akad) jemný (angl. subtle), z nepoužívaného kořene "posílit", ‫!ה‬ ‫( דע‬deáh) poznání, ‫( אח‬ách) bratr . (tedy "jemné poznání" nebo "posiluj bratra" ?) 9

Topas - ‫!ה‬ ‫טד‬#‫( פ‬pitedáh) - viz výše,

‫( טופז‬topaz - moderní hebr.), topaz pochází z původního ‫( תפוז‬tpuz)

pomeranč -

‫( תפוצה‬tipócah) rozptýlení (?) (angl. dispersion), v sanskrtu původně (pit-dah) horko/oheň... Chrysopras ‫( כריזופראס‬chrizopras - jen moderní hebr.) - ‫( כרי‬kri) stráž, ‫ף‬0‫ע‬0‫( ז‬záp) zlost, podráždění, ‫אש‬J‫( ר‬róaš) žluč, jedovatý (tedy ochránit se před jedovatou zlostí). 10

Hyacint - (angl. Jacinth) - je květina nebo mytologická postava - ‫( יקינתון‬jikinton) - ‫( ע!יך‬ájek) slabý, vyčerpaný

11

(angl. faint,weary), ‫יך‬#‫( ע‬jik) být slabý, ‫ י‬dělá podstatné jméno, ‫ן‬0‫( !נת‬nautan) mnoho významů, zejména darovati... Jako ὑακίνθινος (hyakinthinos) se ale také překládalo slovo ‫( תכלת‬tekelet) modrý. ‫ית‬# ‫כל‬0‫( ת‬takelit) je dokončení, důsledek, konec, dokonalost.. 12

Ametyst - ‫( אחל!מ!ה‬achelamah) - ‫( אח‬ách) bratr (a mnoho dalších významů), ‫מעה‬

‫( ל‬le meah) k nitru,

‫( אח‬ách) bratr, ‫( אל‬el) Bůh, ‫( ע=מ!ה‬ema) blízko.. (jistě jsem nenašel všechny významy a možné překlady, ale obrys toho, co tím bylo míněno, a jak se to má číst (přes fonetickou příbuznost, hledat správný/zamýšlený význam), již jasně vyvstává... Hebrew New Testament Delitzsch má ta jména pomíchaná, ve Strongs dict. obvykle značená "pravděpodobně","možná", ale v českém slovníku třeba jen jako "drahokam" a ne konkrétní jméno) ...

2014-03-12

Hebrew New Testament Delitzsch ty kameny překládá jinak: 1 ‫( י!שפה‬onyx), 2 ‫יר‬#‫פ‬0‫( ס‬safír/saphire), 3 ‫( שבו‬achát/ agate), 4 ‫( ב!ר!קת‬Smaragd/Emerald), 5 ‫ם‬J‫ל‬5 ‫ה‬0‫( י‬jaspis/jasper), 6 ‫דם‬J‫( א‬adam - karneol/carnelian), 7 ‫יש‬#‫רש‬0‫ת‬ (Chrisolit), 8 ‫ם‬0‫ה‬J‫( ש‬Karneol/Beryl,Onyx), 9 ‫!ה‬ ‫טד‬#‫( פ‬Chrisolit/Topaz), 10 ‫פך‬J‫( נ‬malachit/malachite,emerald), 11 ‫( לשם‬Opál/Opal), 12 ‫( אחל!מ!ה‬Ametyst/Amethyst) ... Odlišnosti (kromě odlišností v pořadí): Achát/agate - ‫( שבו‬šebó) - ‫( שבוע!ה‬šebůá) slib, přísaha (angl. oath), ‫!בוע‬ ‫( ש‬šábuá) týden Chrisolit (chrisolite, yellow jasper) - ‫יש‬# ‫רש‬0‫( ת‬tar-šíš) - ‫( תרש‬teh-reš) přísnost (strictness), ‫( יש‬jajš) je, existuje?, často i ve významu negativní otázky (exists, often implies a doubt whether what is asked about is to be found or exists), ‫יש‬#‫( א‬iš) muž Opál - ‫( לשם‬lešem) -

‫( ל‬le) ke, ‫( שם‬šém) jménu Malachit (emerald) - ‫פך‬J‫( נ‬nófek) - ‫( נפח‬noufach) dýchat, přivádět k zoufalství ... Myslím, že moje předchozí překlady jsou vhodnější než tyto... -------------------------------------------------------------------------2014-03-06

Perly - ‫ים‬#‫ינ‬#‫( פנ‬peninim) - ‫( פנימי‬penimi) vnitřní, dovnitř, nebo Perly - ‫( ר!אמות‬rámót) jako ‫( ראם‬ram) vyzdvižený, vysoko, koncové ‫ ות‬je plurál. Jaspis - viz výše. (učedník Boha, tajuplný Bůh, mocný Bůh) Zlato (kromě duchovního významu) - ‫( ז!ה!ב‬záháb) zlato, ‫( זה‬zeh) ten, tento, beránek (angl. lamb), ‫( אב‬áb) otec. Křišťál (kromě podobnosti se slovem Kristus) - ‫ש‬#‫( ג!ב‬gábiš) - ‫יר‬#‫( ג!ב‬gabir) - pán, ‫יר!ה‬#‫( ג!ב‬gabirá(h)) - paní (královna),

‫יע‬#‫( ג!ב‬gabia) kalich, ‫( ש‬písmeno šín) je značka pro Ducha (z trilogie ‫ש‬,‫מ‬,‫ א‬, kde ‫ א‬aleph je Bůh, ‫ מ‬mem je Mesiah, tak logicky pak ‫ ש‬šin je Duch, propojuje Moudrost a Porozumění, možná jako Šechina, i když pro to momentálně nemůžu najít další referenci...), nebo

Křišťál (Ez1,22) ‫ח‬0‫( קר‬kérach) ledový krystal, led, lysina - ‫( ק!ר!ה‬karah) chlad, ‫( קריאה‬keriah) - provolání, kázání Sklo ‫ית‬#‫( זכוכ‬zekůkit) - ‫ך‬0‫( ז‬zák) ryzí, bez vady, ‫( זכך‬zkk) být ryzí, pročistit Jerusalem - ‫ם‬#‫לי‬ 0 !‫( ירוש‬Yerushaláyim) - etymologie se různí, ale ta duchovní je zřejmě tato: ‫ראה‬#‫( י‬ireáh) nebo ‫ירא‬ bázeň boží, bohabojnost, nebo tradičně od ‫( ירה‬jaurau) učit, kázat, dokázat, střílet, ‫( ו‬v) "a", ‫( ש!לום‬šálom) mír, pokoj, koncovka "im" je množné číslo. Že ten starý Jerusalém tomu jménu dnes již moc nedosvědčuje, je jiná otázka... Pokud se Ježíš jmenoval stejně jako předtím Jozue (Ex.33,11), etymologie je ‫( יהוש=ע‬Jehošua), ze slov ‫יהוה‬ (Jehova, IHVH) a ‫( ישע‬iša) spása, spasitel, spasiti... (jiný možný zápis by byl ‫ יהשוה‬...?). Nazaret je vysvětlován různě: ‫ת‬0‫!צר‬ ‫( נ‬Naceret, dříve prý Nazara) je město, od ‫( נצר‬ncr) bránit, opatrovat nebo odnož, výhonek, nebo ‫יר‬#‫( נ!ז‬Názir) - zasvěcenec, zasvěcený, vysvěcený, což odpovídá i předchozím proroctvím, nebo ‫ים‬#‫צר‬J‫( נ‬nócrim) ochránce, nebo nepravděpodobné gnostické nazara (z řečtiny) - Pravda... (viz ..., kde jsou i odkazy na různá použití, zčásti Nazaret a z části Násir (Nazarene)...) (výslovnost pouze odhaduji, někdy je v anglickém slovníku napsaná výslovnost... část překladu je ze slovníků Davar (jw czech, Strong's, Brown-Driver-Briggs, Hebrew lexicon © www.onlinebible.com), část z odkazů ve wikipedii. Davar 3 s (nesprávným) hebrejským překladem jsem si naštěstí stáhnul až potom... Učil jsem se před 20 lety hebrejsky, protože jsem chtěl odhalit nějaký skrytý kód ve starém zákoně, učil jsem se i kabalu, a pak jsem to vzdal (to byl jeden z těch "svitků", které mi byly sladké v ústech, ale zhořkly mi v žaludku), protože v bibli jsou většinou zakódovány Obrazy (podobenství), ne konkrétní slova / čísla... a teď se to hodilo - nějaký slovní kód jsem přece asi našel...)

2014-03-12

12 kmenů v Zj7,5-8 - pochybuji, že by se nějak týkaly dnešního Izraele (ale možná vlastně ano...) (Překlady podle heb-ang. slovníku Davar 2.4, www.onlinebible.com ... Většinou se jedná o klasické významy těchto jmen, ovšem s vyjímkami...) Israel - - více etymologií: ‫( ש!ר!ה‬Sára(h)) - více významů, ale i zápasiti (contend), setrvávat (persist), ‫( אל‬el) Bůh, klasický výklad "Bůh setrvává/vítězí" (God prevails), správnější výklad "Boží Bojovníci"... Kéž by to místo boje bylo od kořene ‫!ר‬ ‫( י!ש‬jášár) - prostý, upřímný... (Uvedeno v pořadí v Zj7, čísla udávají pořadí v Gn35,23-26) 4

Jehuda - ‫ יהוד!ה‬- chválený (praised), Juda, od kořene ‫( ידה‬jaudau) - chválit, vzdávat díky

1

Reuben - ‫ ראובן‬- "spatř/viz syna" (see son), imperativ od ‫( ראה‬róeh) - prorocké vidění, ‫( בן‬ben) syn

11

Gád - ‫ ג!ד‬- vojsko, oddíl (troop) ale i štěstí (good fortune), od ‫( גוד‬gůd) - přemoci (overcome), napadnout (invade)

12

Ašer - ‫ אשר‬- šťastný (happy), požehnaný (blessed), jít přímo (to go straight)

10

Naftali - ‫י‬#‫פת!ל‬0 ‫ נ‬- zápas (wrestling), od ‫( פתל‬pautal) točit (twist), zápasit

--

Menášeh - ‫שה‬0‫ מנ‬- není syn Jákobův, ale Josefův (Gn41,51) (not a son) - způsobující zapomnění (causing to forget)

- od ‫( נשה‬naušau) - zapomenout (forget), zbavit (deprive) 2

Šimeon - ‫מון‬#‫ ש‬- "slyšel" (heared) - od ‫( שמע‬šéma) slyšet, podobné jako ‫( שמ‬šém) jméno

3

Lévi - ‫י‬#‫ לו‬- připojený, spojený (joined), od ‫( לויה‬livjau) - věnec z květin (wreath) (není Israelský kmen...)

Isachar - ‫!שכ!ר‬ ‫( יש‬Isáskar) - odměna (recompense), od ‫( נשא‬nausau) - brát,holý,odpustit,oslavovat, a ‫( שכר‬saukar) odměna, plat 5

6

Zebulun - ‫ זבול=ן‬- vysoce postavený (exalted) - od kořene ‫( זבל‬zaubal) - čest, i vzdát čest.

7

Josef - ‫ יוסף‬- Jehova přidal (Iehova added) - od ‫( יסף‬jausaf) - přidat, zvětšit (increase), připojit se, spojit se (join)

Binjámin - ‫ן‬#‫ני!מ‬#‫ ב‬- Syn pravé ruky (Son of right hand) od ‫( ימן‬imn) pravá ruka i pravičák, nebo ‫י‬#‫ ימ!נ‬Syn jihu, nebo Druhý Syn? 8

Není zde jmenován tento kmen / syn ?! : 9

Dan - ‫ ד!ן‬- soudce od ‫( רין‬din) soudit (to judge), zápasit (contend), žádat (plead) nebo soud/rozsudek (judgment) (Vím, kdo vás bude soudit ! ‫ ( אדם‬Adam - Lid )... Viz. - Referendum a Moudrá Rada...) (2014-03-15)

Povšimněte si, že v bílé roucho jsou oblečeni a před trůnem Beránkovým stojí až ti z ostatních národů (Zj7,9)... To, co je přeloženo jako "znamenat na čelech" (Zj7,3-8), je v řečtině εσφραγισμενοι (esfragismenoi - není ve slovnících Davar ani moderní řečtiny, Google i KJV ale ví, že to znamená "Zapečetěný" ) a v Heb.New.Test. Delitzsch je to přeloženo jako ‫ם‬# ‫תומ‬5‫( ח‬chátůmim), a ani to není přesně v biblickém slovníku, ale může to být od začátku ‫ת‬0‫( ח‬chát) vyděšený, zděšení, děs... ? V moderní hebrejštině (Google) to je od ‫תום‬5‫( ח‬chatům), podepsaný, od kořene ‫ת!ם‬J‫( ח‬chótám) pečeť, zapečetit, uzavírat, být zadržen, zapečetit, svazovat pečetí, koncové ‫ ים‬je množné číslo... Čelo

‫ח‬0‫( מצ‬mecách) tam je μετοπων (metopon) pouze v Zj.7,3 těsně před tím...

Tradiční pořadí je prý toto: 1. Reuben, 2. Simeon, 3. Levi, 4. Judah, 5. Issachar, 6. Zebulun, 7. Dan, 8. Naphtali, 9. Gad, 10. Asher, 11. Joseph, 12. Benjamin Pořadí podle rozdělení Izraele: 1. Reuben, 2. Simeon, 3. Judah, 4. Issachar, 5. Zebulun, 6. Dan, 7. Naphtali, 8. Gad, 9. Asher, 10. Benjamin, 11. Ephraim (son of Joseph), 12. Manasseh (son of Joseph) Lévi nemá přidělené žádné území, jen jednotlivá města uvnitř ostatních území...

(Ani v jedné variantě není zároveň Josef a Manasseh, a ani v jedné nechybí Dan. Kromě Judy (a možná Benjamina) už jsou ty kmeny ztracené (a byly ztracené už v době, kdy to Jan psal...), ještě snad Simeon je vmíšen do Judah, a Levi si udržují své oddělení, ty ostatní už zřejmě nejsou (Sargon je odvedl do Sýrie a Íránu)...)

Proč je to napsané i na branách Nového Jeruzaléma (Zj21,12) ? (Rád bych ale připoměl předchozí část mého proroctví, že: "Láska (soucit, odpuštění) by měla postupně převážit nad lhostejností i nenávistí"... Rozhodně to není návod k další genocidě nebo rasismu...! Ovšem dokud budou na vysokých pozicích škodit, světový mír je v nedohlednu... )

2014-03-17

Král Kobylek (Zj9,11, které jsou zejména mobilní telefony), se jmenuje ‫דון‬0‫ב‬5‫( א‬Abaddon) - říše zkázy, ale mohlo by to být i ‫און‬

‫( עבד‬Abaddon), sluha/uctívač marnosti/klamu/kouzel nebo i tvůrčí síly... 2014-03-20

S větou Zj2,2 k Evropě: "že nemůžeš trpěti zlých; a zkusil jsi těch, kteříž se praví býti apoštolé, ale nejsou, a shledals je, že jsou lháři" to není jednoduché... "Levný" výklad by byl, že se jedná o církve, které se prohlašují za ty jediné pravé apoštolské. Ale to by bylo zmíněno spíše u církve Pergamenské (u křesťanů), ne u Evropy. (Ale mohlo se to týkat středověkých církví, prorostlých "politiky"...? Ti už naštěstí odešli za mocí jinam...) Význam slova αποστολους (apoštol) ve slovníku "Greek Lexicon IPD" najdeme: "a delegate, messenger, one sent forth with orders, ...", a odkaz na HE Strong H7971: ‫( שלח‬šálach). V hebrejském slovníku pro to najdeme tyto významy: "rozeslati, být propuštěn, poslat, vodojem, máchnouti (žezlem), vztáhnout po něčem (ruku), vztyčovat (prsty), násilná smrt, zbraň, ... poslati, doručiti, být odeslán, poslán, dát volnost, zasílat, zaplésti se, vyslati". Je otázka, koho tím mohl Jan myslet, ale napadají mě naše evropské zastupitelské orgány (konkrétně EK a možná i ER), které nás nezastupují, a nikdo je nevolil... (i podle umístění jako vztahu k Evropě a ne ke křesťanství) ? Napadá Vás někdo další? 2014-03-29

K překladu Gn2,8 "Štípil pak byl Hospodin Bůh ráj v Eden na východ" (uvedenému zde na začátku), ‫( עדן‬Eden) znamená "rozkošný" (angl. pleasure) a ‫( קדם‬Kedem) znamená kromě východu i pravěk (angl. prehistory), zvláště, když je tam použito "od pravěku" nebo "od východu", není tam "na východ"... ‫ן‬0‫( ג‬Gan) je zahrada. Celé to je ‫קדם‬#‫ן־בעדן מ‬0‫ ג‬zahradu v rozkoši od pravěku. Tedy interpretace, že strom života je ve věčné obrodě v čisté přírodě (v pravěku), a strom poznání (civilizace) přivádí lidstvo k rozporu s čistou přírodou a k ukončení pobytu v bezelstném ráji, není v rozporu s původním textem...

‫( אד!ם‬Adam) znamená lidstvo, člověk, lidé, lidský, ‫( אדם‬adm) je také červený, příbuzné slovo je ‫ד!מ!ה‬5‫( א‬adamáh, ženský rod od slova Adam?) zem, půda, prsť... (z prachu země: afar min ha-adamah)

Gn2,15: "člověka postavil v ráji v zemi Eden, aby jej dělal a ostříhal ho" : dělal ‫ ע!בד!ה‬ve smyslu "sloužit, obdělávat, otročit, pracovat, bohoslužba, modloslužba", střežil ‫ ש!מר!ה‬ve smyslu "strážit, hlídat". Nevím, jestli následující text se čtyřmi řekami může mít nějaký Duchovní význam, nebo se již jedná o "naivní" (antickou) tradici?

Gn2,10: Odtud vycházela ‫( נ!ה!ר‬nahar) řeka (nebo "proud", proudit, "světlo" (zářit) nebo "jiskření", rozjasnit, zářit (radostí) ) k "napájení" zahrady Eden, která se rozdělovala ve čtyři "hlavy":

‫ישון‬#‫( פ‬Píšón), ( = zvětšovat se, angl. increase, od ‫ פוש‬rozprostřít, růst) - (možná etymologie od ‫( פי‬pi) místo, ústa, zde (jako v ‫ )פי החירת‬a buďto ‫( ישוע!ה‬ješua) spása, ‫ע‬0‫( יש‬ješá) spása a ‫( און‬ón) úsilí, nebo ‫( י!ש!ן‬jašan) zestárnout, 1

zastaralý, pokročilý, nebo ‫י‬#‫( שונ‬šuni) šťastný (angl. fortunate) ) - která obchází (krouží kolem, obtéká) zemi ‫יל!ה‬#‫ו‬5‫ח‬ (Chaviláh) - (od kořene ‫( חוי‬chvi) vesničan (angl. villager) od kořene ‫( חוה‬chvh) vesnice, "living place", Eva (život, život dávající), nebo od kořene ‫( חול‬chvl) točit se, vířit, tancovat (twist), ale i v ‫ם‬#‫י‬0‫( חול י!ד‬chol jadaim) poskytnout pomoc(ruce) ) ... V té zemi je ‫( ז!ה!ב‬záháv) - zlato, a ‫ח‬0‫ל‬J‫( בד‬bdólách) Bdelium (nějaká pryskyřice) (od kořene ‫( בדל‬bdl) oddělit, rozdělit (angl. divide, separate) a možná ‫ אח‬bratr...?) a ‫( אבן‬eben) kámen (trochu mi to připomíná složeninu z otec-syn?), a

‫ם‬0‫ה‬J‫( ש‬šóham) karneol (už dříve zmíněno, že to je z ‫( שוה‬šóh) poskytnout pomoc, ‫ם‬0‫( ע‬ám) příbuzný).

‫יחון‬#‫( ג‬Gíchón) - (doslova angl. "bursting forth", od ‫יח‬#‫( ג‬gíach) vyvaliti se, vyrojiti) která obchází (krouží kolem) země ‫( כוש‬Kůš) (Etiopie, nebo okolí jižního Nilu, od slova "černý" ? Co kdyby to bylo od ‫( קשש‬kaušaš) sbírat ? ) ‫דקל‬#‫( ח‬Chiddekel) (angl. prý Chiddekel = "rapid" rychlý, svižný, možná od ‫ד‬0‫( ח‬chad) jeden, ostrý, ‫ל‬0‫( ק‬qal) rychlý, svižný,

2

3

obratný, mrštný, hbitý, zbrklý) - (ztotožňována s řekou Tigris), která [chodí, pluje, cestuje] [dříve než, východně], [krok, chodit, Asýrie] 4

‫( פר!ת‬Perat) - Eufrates (možné etymologie - koncové ‫ ת‬je ženský rod, ‫ פרה‬nésti ovoce, plodný, kráva, divoký osel,

‫ח‬0‫ פר‬výhonek, poupě, květ, ‫ פרט‬spadaná zrnka, ‫י‬#‫ פר‬ovoce, plody, ‫ פרע‬volně růst (neupraveně), ? ) ------Poté, co Darwin a jeho následovníci dokázali nesprávnost tradičních výkladů Genesis, jsou reálně možné jen dvě varianty: Buďto to nebyla pravda od začátku, a Moudří lidé starověku si to vymysleli, aby vyvedli lidstvo z temnoty antiky na práh dobré civilizace, nebo byl text inspirován, má Pravdu, a jen naivní (antické) tradiční výklady nebyly správné... V druhém případě má

smysl hledat, co to tedy znamenalo doopravdy, když tradiční výklad neodpovídá důkazům, a když velká část Bible má spíš symbolický význam (podobenství) ... (Anebo od každé z těch možností trochu...)

Key to the message for 7 churches in the St. John's Revelation: Church of Ephesus is Europe. - Nicolaitans are generally those, who claim, that all others lie. Possibly those, who claim, that it does not matter to commit fornication and sins. Church in Smyrna are Muslims. Church in Pergamos are Christian churches. - Antipas are those, who fight "against prestigeous"(?) - for ex. Jan Hus, probably also Galileo, but also others... - Who is Balaam I still do not know surely... (but probably they are those, who spread false doctrines? see also Jezebel further...) Church in Thyatira is the New Age movement and "Healers" and so on... - Jezebel are the false mystics, astrologers etc. - The morning star is the sign of new dawn. Church in Sardis are Jews. Church in Philadelphia are Americans. (this assignment was the most simple...) Church of the Laodiceans means "people naming" (and so the Humanism), but also the scientists and atheists... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(Interpretation, that it is about the particular towns in present-day Turkey, is shallow and naive...) Little more in detail with a probable ethymology of the names: 2014-02-22 (translated 2014-02-25)

Church of Ephesus ( ‫ אפסי־ארץ‬end of land ?? ) is Europe. - Nicolaitans are generally those, who claim, that "all others" lie. (According to another interpretation they are those, who strive to "govern advancement of the ordinary people by the control of a spiritual hierarchy", or/and those, who commit fornication and sins and claim, that it does not matter.) Nevertheless the abbreviation Ni-Co-... is also the Nicene-Constantinople, and particularly in that original form of year 325 with cursing of the opposition at the end... (And also ‫ נכל‬- behave malevolently/spitefully, lay intrigues, stipulate, or ‫ק!יון‬#‫ נ‬impunity..., or ‫לא‬ Church of Smyrna ( ‫יר‬#‫שמ‬ ! thornbush/diamant

‫ נקיון‬innocent is not ?) ‫ שמר‬alert ‫ נ!א‬after_all/please ‫ים‬#‫ נ!ע‬lovely ?? ) are Muslims.

Church of Pergamon ( ‫ פער‬wide_open ‫ ג׳מא‬papyrus, but also the word Parchment in some languages ) are Christian churches. - Antipas (from latin/greek) are those, who fight "against prestigeous"(?) - Jan Hus, Cathars, probably also Galileo, but also others... (‫מת‬.‫ א‬faithful ‫ פעה‬whine loudly, ‫ פשע‬apostate, ‫ש‬0‫ פ‬proud/vainglory ? probably also ‫" אנתה‬you"...) - Who is Balaam I still do not know surely... (but probably they are those, who spread false doctrines? see also Jezebel further...) Free translation of the meaning of the names in Rev2,14 could be: "Greedy/Unhinged (people) ( ‫עם‬

‫ )בלע‬teach Impoverished/Ravaged ( ‫ק‬0‫ ) ב!ל‬to cast a stumblingblock before the Fighters of God" ( Balaam possibly ‫ם‬0‫ ב!ל‬brake/tame, possibly ‫" בל עם‬not from people" ??) so: Greedy cumulation of wealth is an eyesore (thorn in the eye) to the poor people, which by this reason turn away from from the faith. or/and: Bemused doctrine is an eyesore... ? Probably rather not... (old testament Balaam did not teach Balac, conversely he opposed to casting stumblingblocks...) Church of Thyatira ( ‫ירוש‬#‫ת‬

‫ו!ה‬5‫א‬0‫ ת‬- desire young_wine ??) is the New Age movement and "Healers" etc...

- Yezebel ( ‫ז!בול‬7‫ ע‬- marketplace) are those false mystics, astrologers etc. - Morning Star is a sign of the new dawn. (But morning star has got same meaning as ‫" שחר‬intensive search" or also

‫" הילל‬lucipher", ‫ כוכב‬star is also "messiah" or "Godly omniscience" )

Church of Sardis ( ‫ין‬#‫ ס!ר ד‬deflect_from,law, Σάρδεις - ‫ ס!ר‬deflect_from, Deo in latin or ‫ דע!ה‬knowledge) are Jews. (and verily in that nazistic and rasistic state there remained also few unfeigned fair ones, but they are a minority... And other two references to jews are in other chapters, see... Where have you got your

‫ים‬#‫דיק‬0‫)!? צ‬

Church of Philadelphia are Americans. (this assignment was the most simple, see Philadelphia 1787 Constitution...) ("hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown" - but didn't hold it, and the crown "of that Just one" was already (almost) removed from them.) (Whether Ian could know this nexus (Philadelphia) before 2 thousand years? As a prophet he could...) (Also, Φιλαδέλφεια - φιλάω (kiss/love), Δελφοί Delphi is the home of Πύθων (Python) dragon...) (According to another interpretation - more spiritual one, Philadelphia is "Birth of Brotherly Love". Nevertheless neither in dictionary nor in reality I still cannot find any support for this here...) Church of the Laodiceans means "people naming/excusing" (from greek and latin λαός dicere or δικαιολογώ excuse, or δίκαιος just, or ‫ לאום‬people ‫ק‬0‫ ד‬deaf/emaciated/delicate ??) - and so the Humanism, but also the scientists and atheists... By the way, ethymology of the word Patmos could also be

‫ פת מוש‬- secret_part feel.

In "Asia" - beside greek origin of this name, ‫( עשיאל‬asi-el) is "made by God", did not find more similar meaning... (I remark, that I came to these assignments already before finding the hebrew dictionary, which just confirmed my previous vision...) If you, christians, would not like to admit, that Church of Smyrna are Muslims with their just faith, the other candidate for this position would logically be Russia, but there the ten years of tribulation does not correlate in time, and the problem with that bad synagogue does not correlate in place - so I think, that Russia is here filed into the Europe, where it already belongs... If John has addressed only western Eurasia, then the Philadelfian church is Russia. (The word meanings were translated from Czech language, so they may not be exactly accurate in English...) 2014-03-01

And more names: Euro-Majdan, which could be written in some older languages (old czech, latin) as Evro-Magdan and from this form rewritten into hebrew it would be ‫( עורמגדן‬Aur Mgdn or Eur Mgdn) which is almost as Armageddon (transcript of revelation is only in greek, but Ian (John) was hebrew or Aramaic, so he could understand the meaning of names through "his langauge"... Former interpretation of this name was insignificant ruins nowadays) ...

‫ הר מגידו‬Har Megiddo, but these are

Other probable ethymology: ‫ר!ם‬5‫( א‬Aram) - Syria, ‫דעון‬#‫( ג‬gideón) destroyer/hewer/woodcutter, from the root ‫גדע‬ (cut,break). There is many common between Syria and Euro-Majdan: American and western-Europe sponsored (and IDF or wahabbist led) terrorists fight against democratic government, during overly lying and falsification by mass media (Rev16,13-14)... "It is done" (Rev16,17) would be written as ‫ד‬0‫י ע‬#‫( יה‬Iehi ád), is there a similarity to Jihad? Probably not... Another meaning of these words is "Witness of God" or "Proof of God" or "Be Witness", and it has been done this year (2014) on 3 kings feast... (I always thought, that Armageddon is rather a spiritual affair, that already happens for some time, and I was really surprised by this possible connection... Of course it can be a miscue...) Rev17,5 "Mystery, Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth" - Mystery ‫!ה‬ ‫על=מ‬5 0‫ת‬

‫למוד בבלי‬0‫( ת‬talemůd báblí) is probably not random at all. ‫( שפר‬sefer) grand (similar to ‫( ספר‬sefer) the Book) or ‫( ג!דול‬gádól) large? The rest does not resemble anything (táalůmá) and Babylon - similarity to Talmud of Babylon

particular to me, so probably it would have the meaning, as it sounds translated to our languages... Or possibly:

‫( אם זנות‬Em/Am Zenut) or ‫ר!ה‬5‫ע‬0‫( אם נ‬Em Naarah, mother of harlot or maiden), Abominations ‫ תועב!ה‬Tóejbau/Toébáh (could be Θῆβαι Thēbai (Thebes city), originally Waset, ‫( נא אמון‬nō-āmôn) ? ), earth ‫ארץ‬ Mother of fornication (Erec). (Rev17) The beast ‫ץ‬0‫ח‬0‫( ש‬šáchác), bottomless pit ‫( תהום‬tehóm) ? These probably are not names, but images...?

2014-03-06..11 (trans. 2014-03-08)

12 Precious stones in Rev.21, foundations of New Jerusalem: (which can come, when people will understand it...) 1

Jasper - ‫ם‬J‫ל‬5‫ה‬0‫( י‬Jahalóm) - ‫( יה‬Jah) Bůh, ‫( למד‬Lmd) apprentice, to learn, ‫( אלם‬elem) mute, ‫( עלם‬elem) mysterious,

concealed, indifferent, ‫ים‬#‫לומ‬0‫( ע‬alůmim) maturing, developed, youthful vigour, ‫( עלום‬alum) youth, vigour 2

Sapphire - ‫יר‬#‫פ‬0‫( ס‬Sáfir) - ‫( ספר‬Sefer) Book, ‫ר‬0‫( ס!פ‬Sáfár) narrate, ‫ ספר‬expert, count/calculate, ...

3

Chalcedony - ‫( כלקדון‬Klqdon) - ‫יל‬# ‫( כ!ל‬Kálil) entire, whole, perfection, ‫( ק!דוש‬Kádoš) saint, ‫ים‬#‫( קדומ‬Kedůmim)

primeval, ‫( קדם‬Kedem) ancient, eastward, ‫!ה‬ ‫( קדמ‬kadamáh) former, antiquity, ‫( דון‬don) as ‫( דין‬din) judge, defender, defend, law 4

Emerald - ‫( ב!רקת‬Bareket) - ‫!ה‬ ‫( בר!כ‬Berakah) blessing, ‫( ב!ר!ק‬baurak) lightning

5

Sardonyx - (Sard)Onyx - ‫( אוניקס‬Aoniks, modern hebr.) - ‫( און‬Aon) strive, vigour, creative power, or also vanity,

wealth, ‫( יקץ‬iaukac) awake, ‫( יקש‬iaukoš) to lure, entice, hunter, Onyx - ‫( י!שפה‬jaušefai), ‫( ישע‬išá) to save, salvation, ‫( פה‬peh) mouth and estuary, ‫( פה‬ph) hither, here, Sard: ‫( ס!ר!ה‬Sarah) apostasy, ‫ר‬0‫שע‬ 0 (šáár), many meanings, notably gate, for ex. also storm, acknowledge,

‫( ס!ר‬Sár) deflect_from, stubborn ... 6

Carnelian/Sardius - ‫ם‬0‫ה‬J‫( ש‬šóhám) - ‫( שוה‬šóh) be equal, proportionate, to bliss, provide help, ‫ם‬0‫( ע‬ám) relatives,

people, nation, ‫( אם‬em) mother. (so help relatives) Carnelian ‫( קרנליאן‬krnlian - modern hebr.) ‫( קרן‬krn) corner, peak, ray of light, ‫( ל‬le) toward, ‫( יעני‬iauani) "whom God answers", ‫וי!ה‬#‫( ל‬livjau) wreath, fig. of instruction of parents, work of Wisdom, ‫( יונ!ה‬jónau) dove Carnelian is also ‫( אדם‬Adam) Adam, the red one. 7

Chrysolite - ‫!ה‬ ‫טד‬#‫( פ‬pitedáh) - .‫( פתואל‬pitů-el) - vision of God, from ‫( פתה‬pth) open mind , but also deceive, entice,

attract, ‫( דע!ה‬deáh) knowledge, ‫( פת‬pat) secret part, piece, (pót) nakedness Peridot (Chrysolite) - ‫( פרידוט‬peridot, modern hebr.) - ‫( פרי‬peri) fruits, fruit of live, children, descendants,

‫ת‬0‫ע‬0‫( ד‬dáth) knowledge, ‫( דוד‬dód) love, tenderness, caress, uncle ("vision of knowledge", "fruits of knowledge", or "love children" ?) 8

Beryl - ‫( אקד!ח‬eqedách) - ‫( עקה‬eqh) oppression, anxiety, ‫( קדח‬qaudach) kindle (both emotions and fire), ignite. ‫אך‬

(ak) indeed, ‫( עקד‬akod) to bind, to tie, striped, ‫( אכד‬akad) subtle/tender, from an unused root probably meaning "to strengthen", ‫( דע!ה‬deáh) knowledge, ‫( אח‬ách) brother . ("subtle knowledge", or "strengthen brother" ?) 9

Topaz - ‫!ה‬ ‫טד‬#‫( פ‬pitedáh) - see above,

‫( טופז‬topaz - modern hebr.), topaz comes from original ‫( תפוז‬tpuz)

orange

(fruit) - ‫( תפוצה‬tipócah) dispersion (entertainment), in sanscrit originally (pit-dah) heat/fire... 10

Chrysoprasus ‫( כריזופראס‬chrizopras - only modern hebr.) - ‫( כרי‬kri) guard (bodyguard), ‫ף‬0‫ע‬0‫( ז‬záp) anger, rage,

strain, ‫אש‬J‫( ר‬róaš) bile, venom, bitter (so "Guard against poisonous anger/exasperation".) Jacinth - is flower or mythologic figure - ‫( יקינתון‬jikinton) - ‫( ע!יך‬ájek) faint, weary, ‫יך‬#‫( ע‬jik) be faint, ‫ י‬makes noun

11

from verb, ‫ן‬0‫( נ!ת‬nautan) many meanings, particularly give, donate... But as ὑακίνθινος (hyakinthinos) was also translated in LXX the word ‫( תכלת‬tekelet) blue. ‫ית‬#‫כל‬0‫( ת‬takelit) is finish, consequence, end, perfection (excellence) 12

Amethyst - ‫!ה‬ ‫( אחל!מ‬achelamah) - ‫( אח‬ách) brother (and many more meanings), ‫מעה‬

‫( ל‬le meah) toward inner spirit

(both interior, bowels, spirit, inner heart ), ‫( אח‬ách) brother, ‫( אל‬el) God, ‫( ע=מ!ה‬ema) near.. (surely I did not find all meanings and possible translations, but outline of what was intended by this, and how it should be read (by a phonetic similarity, find correct/intended meaning), is clearly emerging... Hebrew New Testament Delitzsch has mixed names, in Strongs dict. marked usually "probably","perhaps", but in Czech dictionary marked for ex. just as "jewel")...

2014-03-12

Hebrew New Testament Delitzsch lists the stones as: 1 ‫( י!שפה‬onyx), 2 ‫יר‬#‫פ‬0‫( ס‬saphire), 3 ‫( שבו‬agate), 4 ‫ב!ר!קת‬ (Emerald), 5 ‫ם‬J‫ל‬5 ‫ה‬0‫( י‬jasper), 6 ‫דם‬J‫( א‬adam - carnelian), 7 ‫יש‬#‫רש‬0‫( ת‬Chrisolit), 8 ‫ם‬0‫ה‬J‫( ש‬Karneol/Beryl,Onyx), 9 ‫טד!ה‬#‫( פ‬Chrisolit/Topaz), 10 ‫פך‬J‫( נ‬malachite,emerald), 11 ‫( לשם‬Opal), 12 ‫( אחל!מ!ה‬Amethyst) ... Differences (beside differences in order): Agate - ‫( שבו‬šebó) - ‫( שבוע!ה‬šebůá) oath, curse, ‫( ש!בוע‬šábuá) week Chrisolite, yellow jasper - ‫יש‬#‫רש‬0‫( ת‬tar-šíš) - ‫( תרש‬teh-reš) strictness, ‫( יש‬jajš) is, exists, often implies a doubt whether what is asked about is to be found or exists, ‫יש‬#‫( א‬iš) man (male) Opal - ‫( לשם‬lešem) -

‫( ל‬le) toward, ‫( שם‬šém) name Malachit (emerald) - ‫פך‬J‫( נ‬nófek) - ‫( נפח‬noufach) breathe, bring to despair... I think, that mine former translations are more suitable than these ones... -------------------------------------------------------------------------2014-03-06

Pearls - ‫ים‬#‫ינ‬#‫( פנ‬peninim) - ‫( פנימי‬penimi) inner, inwards, or Pearls - ‫( ר!אמות‬rámót) as ‫( ראם‬ram) lift up, high, ending

‫ ות‬is plural. Jasper - see above. (apprentice of God, mysterious God, vigorous God) Gold (beside spiritual meaning) - ‫!ב‬ ‫( ז!ה‬záháb) gold, ‫( זה‬zeh) that, this, lamb , ‫( אב‬áb) father. Crystal (beside similarity with word Christos) - ‫ש‬#‫( ג!ב‬gábiš) - ‫יר‬#‫( ג!ב‬gábir) - lord, ‫יר!ה‬#‫( ג!ב‬gábirá(h)) lady (queen), ‫יע‬#‫ג!ב‬ (gabia) chalice, bowl, ‫( ש‬letter šín) is a sign for Spirit (the trilogy ‫ש‬,‫מ‬,‫ א‬, where ‫ א‬aleph is God, ‫ מ‬mem is Messiah, so logically then ‫ ש‬šin is Spirit, connecting Wisdom and Understanding, probably as Shekhina, although I momentarilly cannot find another reference for that...), or

Crystal (Ez1,22) ‫ח‬0‫( קר‬kérach) ice crystal, ice, bald - ‫( ק!ר!ה‬karah) coldness, ‫( קריאה‬keriah) - proclamation, preach Glass ‫ית‬#‫( זכוכ‬zekůkit) - ‫ך‬0‫( ז‬zák) pure, untainted, without defect, ‫( זכך‬zkk) be pure, to purge Yerusalem - ‫ם‬#‫י‬0‫( ירוש!ל‬Yerushaláyim) - ethymology differs, but the spiritual one is probably this: ‫ראה‬#‫( י‬ireáh) or ‫ירא‬ fear of God (reverence), pious, or tradically from ‫( ירה‬jaurau) teach, preach, prove, shoot, ‫( ו‬v) "and", ‫!לום‬ ‫( ש‬šálom) peace, tranquillity, trailing "im" is plural. That the old Yerusalem does not testify this much, is another question...

‫( יהוש=ע‬Jehošua), from words ‫( יהוה‬Jehova, IHVH) and ‫( ישע‬iša) salvation, salvator, save... (other possible notation would be ‫ יהשוה‬...?). Nazareth is explained differently: ‫ת‬0‫( נ!צר‬Natseret, originally Nazara) is a town, from ‫( נצר‬ncr) guard, watch or branch, sprout, or ‫יר‬#‫( !נז‬Názir) - (Nazarene) consecrated, devoted, dedicated, which corresponds also to previous prophecies, or ‫ים‬#‫צר‬J‫( נ‬nótsrim) guardian, or unprobable gnostic nazara (from greek) - the Truth... (see ..., where If Jesus was named same as before Josue (Ex.33,11), ethymology is

are also the links to different usages in gospel, partly to Nazareth and partly as Nazarene...) (pronounciation is just estimated, sometimes in english dictionary was written the pronounciation... part of translations is from the czech and english dictionaries Davar (jw czech, Strong's, Brown-Driver-Briggs, Hebrew lexicon © www.onlinebible.com), part from the links from english wikipedia (marked "modern hebr."). I have self-learned hebrew some 20 years ago, because I wanted to reveal some hidden code in the old testament, learned quabala also, but then I gave up (this was one of those "scrolls", that were sweet in my mouth, but became bitter in my stomach), because in bible there are usually encoded Images (parables), not exact words / numbers... and now it came in useful - some word code I probably found after all...)

(in pronounciation, left from czech version, "š" is "sh" as in "shelf", "j" is "y" as in "yellow", accent mark means longer vocal, "i" is as in "pin", "a" is as in "past" but short, "o" is as in "roll", "u" is as in "put", "e" is as in "let"... as I am not a native hebrew speaker, the pronounciation is only estimated...)

(more texts in Czech version, translation is pending...)