Peran Laboratorium Prodi dalam Akreditasi
Workshop Umsida Sidoarjo, 25 Januari 2016 Budi Santosa
AKREDITASI NASIONAL PT • Internal PJM • BAN-PT • LAM, Lembaga akreditasi mandiri
Perlukah semuanya?
Akreditasi BAN PT 7- standar prodi & institusi,5 tahun, wajib
ABET AUN-QA 15 standar
8 criteria, prodi,6 years, tidak wajib
BAN-PT, AUN & ABET • • • •
BAN-PT: akreditasi nasional ASEAN University Network AUN Actual Quality Assesment ABET: Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology • Ada beberapa Komisi: EAC,CAC,ETAC, ASAC
BAN-PT
2. Tata Pamong, Kepemimpinan dan Penjaminan Mutu 1. Visi, Misi, Tujuan & strategi
3. Mahasiswa dan Lulusan
4. SDM 6. Pembiayaan, Fasilitas dan Sistem Informasi
5. KURIKULUM
7. Penelitain, PKM dan Kerjasama
BAN - PT • Standar 1: Visi, Misi, Tujuan dan Strategi • Standar 2 : Tata Pamong, Kepemimpinan, Sistem Pengelolaan, dan Penjaminan Mutu • Standar 3 : Mahasiswa dan Lulusan • Standar 4: Sumberdaya manusia • Standar 5: Kurikulum • Standar 6: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana, dan Sistem Informasi • Standar 7: Penelitian, PKM, dan Kerjasama
Laboratorium dalam Borang Prodi • Standar 4: Sumberdaya manusia • Butir 4.6.1, Kualitas laboran, teknisi, operator, programer – KURANG DALAM JUMLAH ATAU TERLALU BANYAK SEHINGGA KURANG KEGIATANNYA. – JUMLAH CUKUP DAN SANGAT BAIK KEGIATANNYA.
Laboratorium dalam Borang • Standar 5: Kurikulum • Butir 5.1.4, Substansi praktikum dan pelaksanaan praktikum – PELAKSANAAN MODUL PRAKTIKUM KURANG DARI MINIMUM. – PELAKSANAAN MODUL PRAKTIKUM LEBIH DARI CUKUP (DITAMBAH DENGAN DEMONSTRASI DI LABORATORIUM ) DI PT SENDIRI.
Laboratorium dalam Borang • Standar 5: Kurikulum • Butir 5.3.1.b, Mekanisme penyusunan materi perkuliahan – MATERI KULIAH HANYA DISUSUN OLEH DOSEN PENGAJAR TANPA MELIBATKAN DOSEN LAIN. – MATERI KULIAH DISUSUN OLEH KELOMPOK DOSEN DALAM SATU BIDANG ILMU, DENGAN MEMPERHATIKAN MASUKAN DARI DOSEN LAIN ATAU DARI PENGGUNA LULUSAN.
Laboratorium dalam Borang Prodi • Standar 5: Kurikulum • Butir 5.7.4, Interaksi akademik antara dosenmahasiswa – UPAYA DINILAI KURANG DAN HASILNYA TIDAK NAMPAK, ATAU TIDAK ADA UPAYA. – UPAYA BAIK DAN HASILNYA SUASANA KONDUSIF UNTUK MENINGKATKAN SUASANA AKADEMIK YANG BAIK.
Laboratorium dalam Borang Prodi • Standar 6: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana, dan Sistem Informasi • Butir 6.3.2, Prasarana (kantor, ruang kelas, ruang laboratorium, studio, ruang perpustakaan, kebun percobaan, dsb. kecuali ruang dosen) yang dipergunakan PS dalam proses pembelajaran – PRASARANA KURANG LENGKAP DAN MUTUNYA KURANG BAIK. – PRASARANA LENGKAP DAN MUTUNYA SANGAT BAIK UNTUK PROSES PEMBELAJARAN.
Laboratorium dalam Borang Prodi • Standar 6: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana, dan Sistem Informasi • Butir 6.4.3, Ketersediaan, Akses Dan Pendayagunaan Sarana Utama Di Laboratorium – SANGAT KURANG, KEGIATAN PRAKTIKUM PRAKTIS TIDAK PERNAH DILAKUKAN. – SANGAT MEMADAI, TERAWAT DENGAN SANGAT BAIK, DAN PS MEMILIKI AKSES YANG SANGAT BAIK (MEMILIKI FLEKSIBILITAS DALAM MENGGUNAKANNYA DI LUAR KEGIATAN PRAKTIKUM TERJADWAL).
Laboratorium dalam Borang Pengelola • Standar 6: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana, dan Sistem Informasi • Butir 6.2.2, Rencana investasi untuk pengadaan sarana dalam lima tahun ke depan.
AUN- Fee Item
Member
Associate Member
Honorarium for Lead Assesso
USD 600 per programme (borne by host)
USD 600 per programme (borne by host)
Honorarium for Assessors
USD 300 per programme (borne by host)
USD 300 per programme (borne by host)
Airfare for Assessors and two AUN Secretariats
Borne by host(economy class).
Borne by host(economy class)
Accommodation for Assessors and two AUN Secretariats.
Borne by host
Borne by host
Administrative Fee to AUN Secretariats
USD 1,000 per assessment (borne by host)
USD 1,000 per assessment(borne by host)
Local Hospitality (meals and transportation)
Borne by host
Borne by host Borne by host
Dvelopment fund
none
USD 1000 per programme (borne by host)
•
ABET -Fee Readiness Reviews $1000/program
On-Site Reviews Base fee for an on-site review
$8,000
Fee for each program evaluator (PEV)
$8,000
Additional Fees
One evaluator reviewing two programs
$340
Extra day, per program evaluator
$340
Visit to off-campus location, per location
$340
Travel Expense Reimbursement
Expenses incurred
ABET - Schedule • January 31, Request for Evaluation • July 1, Self Study Report, provided to ABET • September-December, on site visit
AUN QA-ABET • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Expected Learning Outcomes Programme Specification Programme Structure and Content Teaching and Learning Strategy Student Assessment Academic Staff Quality Support Staff Quality Student Quality Student Advice and Support Facilities and Infrastructure Quality Assurance of Teaching and Learning Process Staff Development Activities Stakeholders Feedback Output Stakeholders Satisfaction
• • •
• • • • •
•
CRITERION 1. STUDENTS CRITERION 2. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES CRITERION 3. STUDENT OUTCOMES CRITERION 4. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT CRITERION 5. CURRICULUM CRITERION 6. FACULTY CRITERION 7. FACILITIES CRITERION 8. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT PROGRAM CRITERIA
ABET 1. STUDENTS
– – – – – – –
Student Admissions Evaluating Student Performance Transfer Students and Transfer Courses Advising and Career Guidance Work in Lieu of Courses Graduation Requirements Transcripts of Recent Graduates
2. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
– – – – –
Mission Statement Program Educational Objectives Consistency of the Program Educational Objectives with the Mission of the Institution Program Constituencies Process for Review of the Program Educational Objectives
ABET 3. STUDENT OUTCOMES – –
Student Outcomes Relationship of Student Outcomes to Program Educational Objectives
4. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT – – –
Student Outcomes (SO) Continuous Improvement Additional Information
5. CURRICULUM – –
Program Curriculum Course Syllabi
6. FACULTY – – – – –
Faculty Qualifications Faculty Workload Faculty Size Professional Development Authority and Responsibility of Faculty
ABET 7. FACILITIES – Offices, Classrooms, and Laboratories – Computing Resources – Guidance – Maintenance and Upgrading of Facilities – Library Services – Overall Comments on Facilities 8. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT – Leadership – Program Budget and Financial Support – Staffing – Faculty Hiring and Retention – Support of Faculty Professional Development
PROGRAM CRITERIA • • • •
Appendix A. Course Syllabi ........................................................................................................ Appendix B. Faculty Vitae ........................................................................................................ Appendix C. Facilities .............................................................................................................. Appendix D. Institutional Summary.........................................................................................
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT: THE HEART OF ACCREDITATION
• The true benefits of accreditation lie in the ongoing process of assessment that lays the foundation for programmatic success. The program assessment planning process is related to the following ABET Accreditation Criteria: • ABET Criterion 2: Program Educational Objectives • ABET Criterion 3: Student Outcomes • ABET Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement
Decision • • • •
No Accreditated Deficiencies Weakness Concerned
AUN-SAR • Part 1 :Introduction : Executive summary, Organisation and approach of •
•
•
self-assessment carried out, Brief description of the university, faculty and department – outline the history, mission, vision, objectives and quality policy of the university followed by a brief description of the faculty and department. Part2: AUN-QACriteriaRequirements This section contains the write-up on how the university, faculty or department addresses the requirements of the AAUN-QA criteria. Follow the criteria listed in the self-assessment checklist. Part3: StrengthsandWeaknessesAnalysis Summary of strengths - Summarise the points that the department considers to be its strengths and mark the points that you are proud of. Summary of Weaknesses - Indicate which points the department considers to be weak and in need of improvement. Completed checklist Improvement plan – recommendations to close the gaps identified in the self-assessment and the action plan to implement them. Part4: Appendices Glossary, supporting documents and evidences
AUN-QA Criteria
Possible Evidences
1 Expected Learning Outcomes
Programme & module specifications, course brochure & prospectus, skills matrix, stakeholders’ inputs, university & faculty website, communication media & plans to 2 Programme Specification stakeholders, curriculum review minutes, accreditation & benchmarking reports 3 Programme Structure & Content 4 Teaching & Learning Strategy
Teaching & learning strategy, evidence of action learning, student feedback, online learning portal, module specification
5 Student Assessment
Assessment criteria, samples of in-course assessment, project work, final examination, marking scheme, moderation process, appeal procedure
6 Academic Staff Quality
Recruitment criteria, staff qualifications, peer review & appraisal system, career plan, student feedback, award & recognition systems, staff workload, allocation of roles and duties, termination & retirement schemes 24
AUN-QA Criteria
Possible Evidences
7
Support Staff Quality
Number, type and qualification of support staff, career plan, training plan, appraisal system, award & recognition schemes, student/faculty feedback
8
Student Quality
Student selection process, trend of student intakes, credit system, student workload, student performance reports
9
Student Advice and Support
Mechanisms to report and feedback on student progress, coaching, mentoring and counselling schemes, student feedback
10
Facilities and Infrastructure
Number and type of facilities, utilisation rates, downtime/uptime, maintenance plan, new facilities and upgrading plans, safety & health policy, facilities booking system
11
Quality Assurance of Teaching & Learning Process
Curriculum design, review & approval process and minutes, QA of assessments/examinations, stakeholders’ inputs, external examiners, students feedback
Do
P 53-66
25
AUN-QA Criteria
Possible Evidences
12 Staff Development Activities
Education, training and development policy and plan, training places & hours, scholarships, job rotation & deployment scheme
13 Stakeholders Feedback
Regular & ad-hoc and formal & informal surveys and feedback, uses of reports
14 Output
Pass/drop-out rates, employment statistics, entrylevel salary, employers feedback, average time to graduate, research
15 Stakeholders Satisfaction
Process for measuring stakeholders satisfaction, stakeholders satisfaction trends, perceptions of graduates & university
Do
P53-66
26
Kategori Penilaian AUN • 1= absolutely inadequate; immediate improvements must be made • 2= inadequate, improvements necessary • 3= inadequate, but minor improvements will make it adequate • 4= adequate as expected (meeting the AUN-QA guidelines and criteria) • 5= better than adequate (exceeding the AUN-QA guidelines and criteria) • 6= example of best practices • 7= excellent (world-class or leading practices)
