Citizen Media (Online)

updated ver. 14

Workshop & Focus Group Discussion (FGD) Workshop & Focus Group Discussion (FGD)

Citizen Media (Online) Ethics Code* Drafting Ethics Code Drafting September 16th, 2011 09.00 s/d 21.00 WIB

live Streaming

http://ictwatch.com/live

*) name tentative, others option: Code of Conduct, General Guidance, etc

Citizen Media (Online) Ethics Code* • Become a common reference for the specific Indonesian Internet user that run the activities of communication and interaction with others in cyberspace. • Being guideline for the community to maximize the positive impact of the Internet and minimize negative impacts resulting from its regular use. • Become the form of self‐regulation for Internet users in general that may impact better than simply waiting for or involving the role of other parties / government. • Being one of the support to grow and develop quality and quantity of local positive content that can bring benefit for the personal, community or society. h l i i *) name tentative, others option: Code of Conduct, General Guidance, etc

Related draft (Bahasa) : 1. 12 Butir 12 Butir Kesepakatan Etika Ngeblog

Other

http://www.perempuanindonesia.org/?p=1061

2.

Kode Etik Blogger Indonesia http://blog.kenz.or.id/2009/08/02/kode‐etik‐blogger‐indonesia.html#more‐1279

3 3.

Kode Etik Pengguna Internet http://kompasiana.com/post/internet/2010/10/21/etika‐dalam‐bidang‐it

4.

Kode Etik Blog Anggara http://anggara.org/blog‐regulation/kode‐etik‐blog/

5.

Kode Etik Konten Multimedia http://openstorage.gunadarma.ac.id/handouts/S1_Sistem%20Informasi/ETIKA%20dan%20Profesi %20TSI/DRAFT_KODE_ETIK_KONTEN_MULTIMEDIA.pdf

•

Related draft (English) : – Bandung Declaration http://nus.academia.edu/CatherineCandano/Papers/326956/Bandung_Declarati on_of_Open_Cultures_Technologies_and_Ecologies _ _ p _ _ g _ _ g – http://www.ojr.org/ojr/wiki/ethics/ – http://www.cyberjournalist.net/news/000215.php – http://www.buzzle.com/articles/netiquette‐internet‐ethics.html – http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1087.txt http://www ietf org/rfc/rfc1087 txt – http://blogging.wikia.com/wiki/Blog_Wiki:Blogger%27s_Code_of_Conduct

1. The ethic of transparency We believe public deserves to know about us and our perspecti e to better j dge hat e sa perspective to better judge what we say 2. The ethic of conversation We do not believe in one‐sided lectures. We believe conversation leads to better understanding 3. The ethic of humanity We believe citizen media lives at a human level while old We believe citizen media lives at a human level while old media lives at an institutional level 4. The ethic of the link We believe one of our key jobs is to link public to other voices / source material so they may judge themselves 5 The ethic of 5. The ethic of correction We believe it is not about make no mistake at all, but the most important is to correct errors quickly and openly Sources: Dan Gillmor, Jeff Jarvis, Donny BU

Example: 10 Practical Citizen Example: 10 Practical Citizen Media Ethics Media Ethics

6. The ethic of immediacy We believe the fast spread of information will deliver better q alit of information quality of information 7. The ethic of pluralism We believe the spirit of pluralism in the dissemination of p p information will provide many benefits to society 8. The ethic of accuracy We believe accurate information is a must resulted from We believe accurate information is a must, resulted from check and recheck process to obtain factual data f 9. The ethic of fairness We believe we should be aware of what drives us, and always willing to listen to those who disagree 10 The ethic of 10. The ethic of sharing We believe the knowledge based society is nothing without the spirit and freedom of idea and information sharing Sources: Dan Gillmor, Jeff Jarvis, Donny BU

Example: 10 Practical Citizen Example: 10 Practical Citizen Media Ethics Media Ethics

to actively support, encourage, promote and provide: • open platforms for communication, dialogue and interaction • open and unhindered forms of artistic and cultural expression the use and development of open and free technologies the use and development of open and free technologies • • new forms of collaborative, inclusive and emancipatory digital practice • multi‐disciplinary, cross‐generational and trans‐regional dialogue and exchange • open access to information, networks and knowledge • dedicated physical spaces committed to long‐term and stable community‐building dedicated physical spaces committed to long‐term and stable community‐building to recognise: • that knowledge and information are inherently mobile and act as bridges between cultures • tensions between systems, using these as catalysts to strengthen open expression • th the autonomy of artistic and cultural practice t f ti ti d lt l ti • the need to actively facilitate free expression where it may be under threat • that a digital divide exists which hinders the development of civil society • risk taking, curiosity, self‐initiative and speculative exploration • that there are silent zones, isolated peoples and spaces that must be given the opportunity to be heard and become visible members of a networked community under their free will • that free culture and open artistic expression improve economic and environmental • conditions, acting as catalysts of sustainable human development to entrench: • efficiency, responsibility and sustainability of practice vis‐a‐vis natural & cultural resources • pluralism and freedom of expression in artistic and cultural practice • tolerance and engagement of 'otherness' while repudiating hate, injustice and discrimination • respect for the interaction between environmental and cultural systems • responsive practices of civic and social empowerment • collective intelligence through an open sharing of knowledge and skills • critical and reflective thought articulated through best practice and policies

Can be flexibly adapted by p y anyone in various regions of different customs & culture.

Adaptable

Can be adjusted without great g effort to follow the changing times and the latest technology

Adjustable

Can be easily understood and implemented whether by individuals or various groups.

Doable

Respect Local Wisdom , Diversity and Freedom of Expression

How to Communicate with Other(s) People

How to Produce & Deliver Information

How to Protect P Personal l Privacy & Security

Oth ? Others?

Suggestion for the ethics code content

Intellectual Intellectual Property Right ?

Freedom of Speech ?

Point of Views

Information Information Transparency & Accuracy ?

The Ethics Code Draft

Negative Negative Content Limitation ?

Online Privacy & Security ? Security ?

initiated & run by ICT Watch since 2002

Download at http://internetsehat.org

Other Source: Other Source: INTERNET INTERNET SEHAT content SEHAT content

100 respondents

300 respondents

Preliminary 1 (3 questions)

Preliminary 2 (15 questions)

16 Juli 16 Juli – Pontianak 16 Juli – Surabaya 23 Juli – Semarang 23 Juli – Medan 30 Juli – Jogja

5 Agustus 5 Agustus – Pekanbaru 9 Agustus – Makassar 10 Agustus – Ambon 16 Agustus – Madura 18 Agustus – Palembang

On‐Site Survey & Informal Discussion

1 – 11 September 2011

1 – 11 September 2011

Web Study Web Study

Online Survey 475 respondents http://ictwatch.com/id/survey

16 July – 18 August 2011 16 July – 18 August 2011

16 September 2011 16 September 2011

On‐Site S Survey & & Discussion

Focus G Group Discussion

Activity to develop the output (draft)

The Ethics Code Code Draft

Preliminary Survey Result Preliminary Survey Result of Online Ethics of Online Ethics b ICT W h / 2011 by: ICT Watch / 2011

Layanan yg Anda gunakan untuk salurkan ekspresi/informasi k i/i f i (boleh (b l h lebih l bih dari d i 1) 1)

Slideshare 1%

Forum 7% Google+ 10%

Blog 20%

Youtube 11% Flickr 2%

Twitter 18%

Preliminary 1 (300 respondents)

Facebook 31%

Secara umum saat orang lain sampaikan ekspresinya via I t Internet t Tidak Beretika 2%

Sudah Beretika 30% Belum Beretika 68%


Hal terpenting untuk masuk dalam kode etik online adalah tentangg (p (pilih 1 saja) j ) Tata cara menjaga privasi & sekuriti pribadi / personal 23%

Tata cara memproduksi / menyampaikan informasi 34%


Tata cara berkomunikasi dengan pihak /orang lain 43%

Sumber informasi online yang kapan saja & dimana saja A d akses Anda k

Blog 11%

Media Online 20% Chatroom 0% Forum 6% Mailinglist 8%

Twitter 2%


Facebook 53%

Alat informasi yang paling sering Anda gunakan untuk online? li ? Pc/Laptop disekolah/kamp us 22% Ponsel/BB l/ 27% PC/Laptop di kantor 6% Warnet 6%


PC/Laptop di rumah 39%

Pernahkah sedikit‐banyak nama/reputasi Anda di ik oleh dirugikan l h seseorang di Internet? I t t? di Mailinglist di Mailinglist 1%

di Komentar di Forum 4% berita 0%

di Chatroom 0%

di Blog 5%

di Twitter 0%

di Facebook 34%


Tidak Pernah! 56%

Pernahkah sedikit‐banyak Anda merugikan nama/reputasi / t i seseorang di Internet I t t Ya, di Chatroom Ya, di Forum , 5% 6% Ya, di Mailinglist 0%

Ya, di Komentar berita 0%

Ya, di Twitter 0% Ya, di Facebook 35%


Tidak Pernah! 51%

Ya, di Blog 3%

Layanan online yang paling rentan terjadinya pencemaran nama baik b ik Di fitur komentar artikel Chatroom Forum media 6% 4% (berita) (berita) Mailinglist online 5% 6% Twitter 15%


Blog 1%

Facebook 63%

Ketika menyampaikan/menyajikan informasi, mana yang harus h did h l k didahulukan

Kecepatan penyajiannya 16%

Akurasi Faktanya 84%


Layanan y online yang paling baik y gp g akurasi faktanya y Facebook Twitter 8% 3% Mailinglist 7%

Blog 18%

Forum 13% Media (berita) online 49%


Chatroom 2%

Layanan y online yang paling buruk y gp g akurasi faktanya y Media (berita) online 3%

Blog 4%

Chatroom 24%

Forum 4% Mailinglist 5% Twitter 3%


Facebook 57%

Layanan online yang paling baik kecepatan penyajian i f informasinya i

Blog 10%

Facebook 16% Twitter 12%

Media (berita) online 42%

Mailinglist 7% Forum Chatroom 7% 6%


Layanan online yang paling buruk kecepatan penyajian i f informasinya i

Blog 20%

Facebook 23%

Media (berita) online li 9%

Twitter 14%

Chatroom 6% Forum 7%


Mailinglist 21%

Sumber informasi online yang paling baik akurasi DAN k kecepatannya t

Blog 17%

Facebook 20% Twitter 9%

Media (berita) online 31% Forum 14% Chatroom 4% %


Mailinglist 5%

Pilih 3 (tiga) topik sosial paling layak/positif sebagai di k i pro‐kontra diskusi k t di Internet I t t Suku/Ras 0% Agama 7%

Keuangan 0%

Keamanan 4% Politik 20% %

Hukum 20%

Pekerjaan 5% Seksualitas 3% Kemiskinan 5%


Kesehatan 8%

Pendidikan 22% Kesehatan 6%

Pilih 3 (tiga) topik diskusi online yg paling rentan terjadi d b t kusir debat k i s/d kecaman: /d k Keuangan Suku/Ras 5% 5%

Keamanan 3% Politik 21%

Agama 10%

Hukum 20%

Pekerjaan 7% %


Kesehatan 7% Pendidikan 12%

Kesehatan 0% Kemiskinan Seksualitas 5% 5% %

Layanan online yang paling dapat menjadi tempat di k i pro‐kontra diskusi k t positif itif Di fitur komentar berita 13% Chatroom

Blog 0%

0% FFacebook b k 28% Forum 26%

Twitter 8% Mailinglist 25%


Layanan online yang paling mungkin terjadinya debat k i s/d kecaman kusir /d k Di fitur Blog komentar berita 0% 9% Chatroom 11%

Facebook 40%

FForum 14% Mailinglist 11%


Twitter 15%

Seberapa penting pengguna Internet memiliki & mematuhi t hi kode k d etik tik online li Tidak Penting 1% Biasa saja 15%

Penting 22%


Sangat Penting 62%

Seberapa tahu Anda tentang istilah “Creative C Commons” ” Sangat Tahu 0% Tahu 19% Tidak Tahu 39% Pernah Dengar 42%


Landasan terpenting dalam acuan/panduan etika online li perlindungan hak atas kekayaan intelektual 12% peningkatan transparansi dan akurasi i f informasi i 15% p g pengamanan privasi dan sekuriti di ranah maya 12%

Survey Online (475 respondents)

p pembatasan konten negatif (SARA Pornografi dll) 34%

penegakan penegakan kebebasan berekspresi/ber pendapat 27% 2 %

Media yang paling Anda andalkan untuk menyampaikan ik pendapat/ekspresi d t/ k i Anda A d Wiki 1% Blog 14%

Social Network 59%

Chatroom 1%

Forum 19%

Mailinglist 1% MicroBlog 5%


Perlukah dan sudah adakah acuan/panduan etika online khas li kh Indonesia I d i Tidak Perlu dan Belum Ada 1%

Tidak Perlu tapi Sudah Ada 3%

Perlu dan Sudah Ada 27% Perlu tapi Belum Ada 69%


Porsi terbesar untuk masuk di dalam acuan/panduan etika tik online li Etika menjaga e‐ privasi & e‐ sekuriti personal 17%

Etika Etika memproduksi / menyampaikan informasi 34%


Etika berkomunikasi dengan pihak / orang lain 49%

Secara umum pengguna Internet Indonesia saat online atau t ketika k tik menyampaikan ik pendapatnya d t via Internet: i I t t Tidak Beretika 3%

Sudah Beretika 25% Kurang Beretika 72%


Sumber informasi online dari‐oleh‐untuk warga yang PALING i Anda PALING sering A d baca b

Wiki 5%

Social Networking 45%

Microblog 6%


Blog 19%

Forum 22%

Mailing List 3%

Sumber informasi online dari‐oleh‐untuk warga yang pelakunya l k BELUM/KURANG b tik BELUM/KURANG beretika Wiki 1%

Blog 4%

Chatroom 21% Social Networking 52%

Microblog 4% %


Forum 16%

Mailinglist 2%

Sumber informasi online dari‐oleh‐untuk warga yang pelakunya l k SUDAH b tik SUDAH beretika

Wiki 28%

Social Networking 5% Micro Blogging 5% Mailing List 10% 0%


Blog 16%

Chatroom 1%

Forum 35%

Media komunikasi INTERNET SEHAT berikut ini yang sudah rutin Anda akses/baca/lihat / / (jawaban boleh lebih (j dari 1): YOUTUBE 10%

Belum Ada 8%

TWITTER 25%

FACEBOOK 29%

SITUS 26%


FLICKR 2%

Workshop & FGD Plan Workshop & FGD Plan for Community for Community by: September 16 b S b 16th, 2011 2011

Participants September 16 September 16th, 2011 2011 09.00 ‐ 21.00 WIB Live Streaming

(to be invited)

Civil Society / Other Community Reps.

Community Representative O id J Outside Java

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 6. 7. 8. 9 9.

Palembang Pekanbaru Medan d Pontianak Ambon E d Ende Makassar Denpasar M d Madura

I id J Inside Java

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 6. 7. 8.

Official Media Partner:

Surabaya Jogja Solo l Semarang Malang B d Bandung Bogor JaBoDe‐ TB k TaBek

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 0. 11. 12. 13. 14 14. 15. 16. 17.

JalinMerapi (Community) Karya Tuna Netra (Community) KasKus (Community) ( ) Relawan TIK (Community) SalingSilang (Community) Blog/Forum Detik (Community) Kompasiana (Community) BlogVaganza (Community) TV Komunitas Online (Community) Air Putih ut ((Foundation) ou dat o ) Satu Dunia (Foundation) Wiki Indonesia (Foundation) id‐IGF Committee (Initiative) Akademi Berbagi (Initiative) ArusPelangi (Initiative) Internet Sehat (Initiative) idblogNetwork (Initiative)

Agenda Day‐1 (September 16th, 2011) : ‐ 09.00 – 09.15 : Opening ‐ 09.15 – 10.30 : Sharing 1 (Ministry, APJII, PANDI) ‐ 10.30 – 11.45 : Sharing 2 (ICJR, AJI) (host: Rapin M.) ‐ 11.45 – 13.15 : ‐ break, Friday praying, lunch ‐ ‐ 13.15 – 13.30 : Internet Sehat Booklet Release ‐ 13.30 – 15.00 : Sharing 3 (Google, Nukman L.) (host: Onno W Purbo) ‐ 15.00 15.00 – 15.15 : 15.15 : ‐ break & FGD preparation break & FGD preparation ‐ ‐ 15.15 – 16.00 : FGD Session 1 (host: Idaman A.) ‐ 16.00 – 19.00 : ‐ break, dinner ‐ ‐ 19.00 – 19 00 20.45 : FGD Session 2 20 45 : FGD Session 2 (host: Idaman A.) ‐ 20.45 – 21.00 : Wrap Up Session + Closing

Agenda Day‐2 (September 17th, 2011) ‐ 07.00 – 08.30 : ‐ breakfast & check‐out **‐ ‐ 08.30 : Participants go to AMPROKAN p g Bekasi (by shuttle bus provided) – host: Ajeng

Gatot Dewabroto* (ICT Ministry / Kominfo.go.id) Topic: Self Regulation on Internet Community Topic: Self‐Regulation on Internet Community Sammy Pangerapan (ISP Association / APJII.or.id) Topic: Internet Services for Community Andi Budimansyah (cc‐TLD .id / PANDI.or.id) Topic: Domain .id as a Community Identity Topic: Domain .id as a Community Identity Nukman Luthfie (New Media Expert / Virtual.co.id) Topic: Best Practices on Indonesian Online Ethics Anggara (Public Interest Lawyer / ICJR.or.id) Topic: Freedom of Speech on the Net Nezar Patria (Press Alliance / AJIindonesia.org) Topic: New Media on Today Perspective *) to be confirmed

Ross LaJeunesse, Head, Public Policy and G Aff i G Gov Affairs, Google – l Asia Pacific A i P ifi Ann Lavin, Head, Public Policy and Gov Affairs, Google – Southeast Asia Mike Orgill, Country Lead, Public Policy & g , y , y Gov Affairs, Google – Southeast Asia

**) Room sharing accommodation at Harris hotel is available for participants from outside the greater Jakarta (Jabodetabek + Bandung) only. The Others will be full reimbursed the cost of regular taxi / transportation.

The All Stars

You! Yes, You! Ross LaJeunesse Onno Purbo Gatot Dewa Broto

Mike Orgill Anggara S.

Andi Budimansyah

Ann Lavin

Idaman A.

Nukman L.

Rapin M

Sammy Pangerapan

Nezar Patria

updated ver. 14

Content Enrichment by: ICT Watch, APJII, PANDI, XL, ACER, AJI, ICJR, VIRTUAL, GOOGLE, HIVOS

Person Email Twitter Phone

: arief / siti / acep : info[at]ictwatch.com : @internetsehat : 021 – 98495770 : 021

Citizen Media (Online)

Recommend Documents