DAFTAR PUSTAKA [1]
Widjaja, A.W. 1993. Administrasi Kearsipan: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Grafindo.
[2]
Keputusan Mendikbud RI Nomor 091/U/1995 tentang Pedoman Tata Kerja Persuratan dan Kearsipan di Lingkungan Depdikbud RI.
[3]
Dina Anggraini, 2008, Jurnal Ilmiah Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Tata Persuratan Menggunakan UML dan Natural Language Processing. Jakarta:Universitas Gunadarma
[4]
Fritz, M.B. and Higa, K, Narasimhan, S. 1995. Toward a Telenetwork Taxonomy and Test for Suitability: A Synthesis of the Literature, Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, July, pp 311-334
[5]
Gray, P. 1995. The Virtual Workplace, ORMS Today, August, pp 22-26
[6]
Carnegie Mellon University. http://web.archive.org/web/20070903115947/ http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/03.reports/03tr002/03tr00 2glossary.html. Diakses tanggal 5 Februari 2015.
[7]
Kroenke, D M. 2008. Experiencing MIS. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[8]
Davis, Gordon B. 2002. Kerangka Dasar: Sistem Informasi Manajemen, Bagian I Pengantar. Seri Manajemen No. 90-A. Cetakan Kedua Belas, Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Binawan Pressindo.
[9]
Tim Pengembang. 2013. Panduan Teknis Internal Electronic Mailing Systems (InEMS). UGM. Yogyakarta. Tidak dipublikasi.
[10]
Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. J. 1992. Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2): 299-326
[11]
Silince, J.A.A.; Macdonald, S; Lefang, G.; Frost B. 1998. Email adoption, Diffution, Use and ImpactWithin Small Firm: A Survey of UK Companies, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 18 No.4, pp 231-242.
[12]
Bajwa, D. S. and L. Floyd Lewis. 2002. Current status of information technologies in support of task-oriented collaboration, IEEE.
72
73
[13]
Kugelmas, J. 1995., Telecommuting: A Manager’s Guide to Flexible Work Arrangements
[14]
Lee, A., S. 1994. Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No.2, June, pp 143-157
[12]
Hidayat, Adityo dkk. 2013. Sosialisasi Pemanfaatan Internal Electronic Mailing Systems (InEMS) di Lingkungan UGM. UGM. Yogyakarta. Tidak dipublikasi.
[13]
Putri, Gusti Agung Ayu. 2005. Sistem Informasi Manajemen Persuratan dan Kearsipan berbasis Teknologi Informasi di Universitas Udayana. Perpustakaan Pusat UGM. Tesis. Yogyakarta.
[14]
Arief, Muhammad R. 2005. Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem E-Office di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Perpustakaan MTI UGM. Tesis. Yogyakarta.
[15]
Oktavianti. 2007. "Evaluasi Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Teknologi Informasi dengan Menggunakan Variabel Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, dan Perceived Enjoyment: studi kasus di PT.Sanggar Sarana Baja pada Departemen Accounting dan Marketing," Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Tesis 2007.
[16]
Wijayanti. 2011. Pengaruh Kegunaan Persepsian, Kemudahan Penggunaan Persepsian, Norma Subyektif dan Resiko Persepsian Terhadap Penggunaan Aktual Aplikasi
Paperless
Office
di
Universitas
Gadjah
Mada.
Perpustakaan Pusat UGM. Tesis. Yogyakarta. [17]
Novriando, Haried. 2012. Analisis Implementasi Paperless Office (PLO) di Lingkungan Universitas Gadjah Mada (Studi Kasus di Tiga Fakultas). Perpustakaan MTI UGM. Tesis. Yogyakarta.
[18] Davis, F.D. 1986. Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information system Theory and Result. MIT: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. [19]
Kim, Jong-Ae. 2005. User Acceptance of Web-based Subscription Database. Tallahassee Florida: Information Studies Departemen Florida
74
State University. Dissertation. Terarsip di http://proquest.com/pqdweb. diakses tanggal 1 Agustus 2015. [20]
Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999.
[21]
Ajzen, I., dan Fishbein, M, (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
[22]
Bagozzi, R. P.; Davis, F. D.; Warshaw, P. R. (1992), "Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage.", Human Relations 45 (7): 660–686
[23]
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
[24]
Yarbrough, A.K., & Smith, T.B., (2007):Technology Acceptance among Physicians: A New Take on TAM, Medical Care Research and Review 200764:650
[25]
Venkatesh, V. dan Davis, F.D. (1996), A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Three Experiments. International Journal of Human- Computer Study, vol. 45.
[26]
Bahmanziari, T., J. Michael Pearson, dan Leon Crosby, “Is tust Important in Technology Adoption? A Policy Capturing Approach”, The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43 (4), pp. 46-54, 2003
[27]
Niagara, H. “ Analisis Pengaruh Kepercayaan Pelanggan Terhadap Adopsi Teknologi: Studi Empiris Jasa Mobile Banking di daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta”, Skripsi Sarjana, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2008
[28]
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Acceptance of Information System Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), pp: 319-339
75
[29]
Martins, L. L., and Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). “A model of business school students’ acceptance of a Web-based course management system,” Academy of Management Learning and Education. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 7-26.
[30]
Gefen, D. and D. W. Straub (1997), “Gender differences in the perception and use of Email:An extension to the UTAUT Model”, MIS Quarterly; Dec 1997; 21, 4; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 389
[31]
Bertrand, M., & Bounchard, S. (2008). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, 1(2), 200-210
[32]
Adam, D.; Nelson, R.R. & Todd, P.A. 1992. “Perceived Usefulness, Easy of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication”. MIS Quartely, Vol. 16, No.2, pp 227-247.
[33]
Liao, C.H.; Tsou, C.W. & Huang, M.F. 2007. “Factor Influencing the Usage of 3G Mobile Services in Taiwan”. Online Information Review, Vol. 31, No.6, pp 759-774.
[34]
Szajna,B. “Empirical Evaluation of The Revised echnology Acceptance Model”, Management Science (42), 1996.
[35]
Lu, J. ; C.S.Yu; C. Liu; dan J.E. Yao. 2003. Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research 13 (3):206-222.
[36]
Ndubisi, N.O., dan M. Jantan. 2003. Evaluating IS usage in Malaysian small and médium-sized firms using the technology acceptance model. Logistic Information Managament 16 (6): 440-450.
[37]
Spacey, R, A.Goulding, dan I. Murray. 2004. Exploring the attitudes of public library staff to the internet using TAM. Journal of Documentation 60 (5): 550-564.
[38]
Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes, and G. Davis. 1995. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems 11, no. 4: 87-114.
[39]
Shivraj Kanungo , Vikas Jain, Online shopping behaviour: moderating role of gender and product category, International Journal of Business Information Systems, v.10 n.2, p.197-221, June 2012
76
[40]
Venkatesh, V and Davis, F. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46(2). Pp. 186-204
[41]
Sjana, B., 1994, ‘Software Evaluation and Choice Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument’, dalam MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 319-324.
[42]
Ramdani, Neila. 2007. Model Perilaku Penggunaan IT “NR2007”: Pengembangan
dari
Technology Acceptance
Model.
Terarsip
di
http://neila.staff.ugm.ac.id/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/neila_ buletin-tsm.pdf diakses tanggal 3 Agustus 2015 [43]
Nugroho, Eko. 2008. Sistem Informasi Manajemen – Konsep, Aplikasi & Perkembangannya. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta.
[44]
Ajzen, I and Fisbein, M. 1980. Understanding, Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood: Prentice Hall.
[45]
Legris, P. Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. 2003. Why Do People Use Information Technology?: A Critical Review of The Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, 40(3), pp. 191-204
[46]
Jogiyanto, 2007. Sistem Informsi Keperilakuan. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
[47]
Mathieson, A.R. 1991. Predicting User Intention Comparing The Technology Acceptance Model with The Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research 2(3). Pp. 173-191
[48]
Igbaria, M,. Pasuraman, S. Baraudi, JJ,. 1996. A Motivational Model of Micocomputer Usage. Journal of Management Information System 13. Pp.127-143
[49]
Rigopoulos, George., Dimitrios Askounis. 2007. A TAM Framework to Evaluate User’s Perception Toward Online Electronic Payments. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Desember, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1-5.
[50]
Lee, Y. Kozar, K.A. and Larsenm, KRT. 2003. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communication of The Association for Information Systems. 12(50). Pp.752-780
77
[51]
https://arifkamarbafadal.wordpress.com/2011/08/24/mengapa-pilihanjatuh-pada-partial-least-square/ diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2015
[52]
http://yrasemsi.blogspot.com/2014/06/langkah-sem-pls-partial-leastsquare.html diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2015
[53]
Igbaria.M., 1990, “End User Computing Effectiveness: A Structural Equation Model”, Omega, 637-652
[54]
Igbaria,M dan Iivari,J. 1995. “The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Computer Usage”, Omega (23:6).
[55]
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391.
[56]
Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35, 237-250.
[57]
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003
[58]
Taylor, S and Todd, PA. 1995. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models Information system Research 6(2). pp.145-176
[59]
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/30817788/PENELITIAN-SURVEY-DANPENELITIAN-TINDAKAN/ diakses tgl. 1 Juni 2015
[60]
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[61]
Cosby, Paul C. 2009. Methods in Behavioral Research. Maufur (penterjemah). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
[62]
Pendit, Putu Laxman. 2003. Penelitian Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi: Suatu Pengantar Diskusi, Epistemology dan Metodologi. Jakarta: JIPFSUI
[63]
Jogiyanto. 2008. Pedoman Survei Kuisioner: Mengembangkan kuisioner, Mengatasi Bias dan Meningkatkan respon Yogyakarta: BP-FE Yogyakarta.
78
[64]
Singarimbun, M. Effendi, S. 1995. Metode Penelitian Survey. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia.
[65]
Neuman, W.Lawrence. 2006. ''Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach.'' USA:University of Wisconsin. Page 227-234.
[66]
Malhotra, Naresh K. 2005. Riset Pemasaran, Pendekatan Terapan. (Soleh Rusyadi Maryam). Jilid 1. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Indeks.
[67]
Ferdinand, Augusty. 2002. Sctructural Equation Modeling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
[68]
Ghozali Imam. 2006. Structural Equation Modeling: Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
[69]
Ghozali I. dan Latan H. 2012. “Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik, dan Aplikasi SmartPLS 2.0 M3 Untuk Penelitian Empiris,” Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
[70]
Ghozali I. 2011. “Structural Equation Modeling. Metode Alternatif Partial Least Square PLS,” Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
[71]
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions?: Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 115-139.
[72]
Jogiyanto, (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis : Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman. BPFE-YOGYAKARTA. Yogyakarta
[73]
Yamin, S. & Kurniawan, H. 2009. Structural Equation Modelling: Belajar Lebih Mudah Teknik Analisis Data Kuesioner dengan Lisrel-PLS, Buku Aplikasi Statistik Seri 2, Salemba Infotek
[74]
Santoso, Singgih. 2011. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan AMOS 18. Elexmedia Computindo. Jakarta.
[75]
Suseno,
Bontos
Himawan
(2009)
Analisis
Faktor-Faktor
Yang
Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Oleh Karyawan PT.KAI (persero) Terhadap Sistem E-ticket di Semarang : Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro.
79
[76]
Yusoff, Yusliza Mohd., Zikri Muhammad., Ermy Syaifuddin Pasah., dan Emmaliana Robert. 2009. Individual Differences, Perceived Ease of Use, and Perceived Usefulness in the E-Library Usage, Computer and Information Science, February, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 76-83.
[77]
Davis, F.D. 1993. User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral, International Journal Management Machine Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 475-487.
