10 QUARTERLY REPORT ADB IN THE 6 CIS RIVER BASIN TERRITORY - PACKAGE B. May - August 2012

ADB TA 7189-INO: INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING FOR INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IWRM)

IN THE 6 CIS RIVER BASIN TERRITORY - PACKAGE B

10 QUARTERLY REPORT th

May - August 2012

TA 7189-INO Package B

10th Quarterly Report September 2012

10th QUARTERLY REPORT FOR TA 7189-INO May - August 2012 1. TA 7189-INO PACKAGE B SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 1 1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Developments during this period .......................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Sub-component B.1 ................................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Sub-component B.2 ................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Sub-component B.3 ................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Major Issues .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Split of 6 Cis RBT .................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Hydrological Database ............................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 State of the Basin .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.4 Completion of sub-component B.3 .......................................................................... 4 1.4. Logistics ................................................................................................................................ 4 2. SUBCOMPONENT B1 INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING AND PLANNING ......................... 5 2.1. Status of B.1 Tasks ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Developments and Key Findings for Component B.1A ........................................................ 5 2.2.1 Task B.1-1 Stakeholders assessment and counterpart training.............................. 5 2.2.2 Task B.1-2 Institutional Strengthening .................................................................... 5 2.3. Developments/Key Findings in Sub-Component B.1B ....................................................... 10 2.3.1 Task B.1-3 Web-based Meta Data Base ............................................................... 10 2.3.2 Task B.1-4 Decision Support Systems (Water Balance Model) ............................ 10 2.3.3 Task B.1-5 Basin Planning,Development of Pola:................................................. 12 2.3.4 Task B1-5 (continued) Formulation of the Rencana ............................................. 15 2.3.5 Task B.1-6 State of The Basin Reporting .............................................................. 21 2.4. Issues .................................................................................................................................. 21 2.4.1 Issues concerning Sub-component B.1A .............................................................. 21 2.4.2 Issues concerning Sub-component B.1B .............................................................. 23 2.5. Developments envisaged before the end of the project ..................................................... 25 3. SUB COMPONENT B.2 ............................................................................................................... 27 3.1. Status of B2 tasks ............................................................................................................... 27 3.2. Developments, Outputs and Issues .................................................................................... 27 3.2.1 Developments ........................................................................................................ 27 3.2.2 Outputs of the extension of sub-component B2 .................................................... 30 3.2.3 Issues .................................................................................................................... 30 3.3. Key Findings ....................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.1 Conclusions and recommendations on the legal framework................................. 31 3.3.2 Conclusions and recommendations for water zoning ........................................... 32 3.4. Developments in next period .............................................................................................. 36 4. SUB COMPONENT B.3 ............................................................................................................... 37 4.1. Status Tasks B.3 ................................................................................................................. 37 4.2. Progress in implementation Tasks B.3 ............................................................................... 37 4.2.1 Task B3-1, B3-3 Groundwater Use in Bandung .................................................... 37 4.2.2 Task B3-2 Water Allocation in Jatiluhur Scheme .................................................. 37 4.2.3 Bulk Water Pricing Study ....................................................................................... 37 4.2.4 Role sharing study ................................................................................................. 38 4.3. Developments and Key Findings ........................................................................................ 38 4.3.1 Follow up on recommended groundwater policies and strategies. ....................... 38 4.3.2 Follow up on recommended surface water policies and strategies....................... 39 4.3.3 Bulk Water Service Fee ......................................................................................... 39 4.3.4 Role Sharing Study ................................................................................................ 39 4.4. Relevant Issues .................................................................................................................. 41 4.5. Developments for the next Period ...................................................................................... 41 5. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PACKAGE B ............................................................................ 43 5.1. Deliverables ........................................................................................................................ 43 5.2. Inputs .................................................................................................................................. 43 5.3. Contract and Variation Order .............................................................................................. 43

DHV, Deltares, MLD

i



List of Table Table 2.1 Revised Project Design and Monitoring Framework for sub-component B.1 ......................... 6 Table 2.2 Overview of scenarios for Pola and Rencana ...................................................................... 14 Table 2.3 Overview of Strategies and application of scenarios and JSM simulations in Rencana ...... 15 Table 2.4 Overview of Demand and Required Supply ......................................................................... 19 Table 2.5 Overview of 2012 budgets available in the BBWS for 6 Cis (in M Rp) ................................. 22 Table 3.1 Status B2 Design and Monitoring Framework (31 August 2012) (Original scope of work) .. 28 Table 3.2 Status B2 Design and Monitoring Framework (31 August 2012) (Extended scope of work)29 Table 3.3 Integration of WR aspects in protected area (kawasan lindung) .......................................... 32 Table 3.4 Local buffer zone (kawasan perlindungan setempat) ........................................................... 32 Table 3.5 Flood disaster zone (kawasan rawan banjir) ........................................................................ 32 Table 4.1 Progress of follow up on Strategies B3 for Groundwater ..................................................... 38 Table 4.2 Progress of follow up on Strategies B3 on Water allocation ................................................ 40 Table 5.1 Overview of budgets (M Rp) available (2011) and planned (2012) in the BBWS ................ 43

List of Figures Figure 2.1 Water Demand from DMI at current levels (green), and based on MDGs (2010, 2030)..... 11 Figure 2.2 Present and future reservoirs and conveyance systems. .................................................. 12 Figure 2.3 Impact of Changing 6 Cis to 3 River Basin Territory ........................................................... 15 Figure 2.4 Development of supply by PDAM and water demand as envisaged in JSM 2.2 ................ 18 Figure 2.5 Overview to Supply Tangerang Cluster ............................................................................... 20 Figure 2.6 Overview to Supply Depok and Bogor Cluster .................................................................... 20 Figure 3.1 Missing guidelines in the integration of WR planning and spatial planning ........................ 31

List of Annexes Annex A Annex B Annex C Annex D Annex E Annex F Annex G + H Annex I Annex J

– – – – – – – – –

Time Planning of Staff including proposed for VO 4 Training Report Published Reports up to September 2012 Trends in Rainfall for 3 long-term recording rainfall stations Plans in Kabupaten Bandung Barat concerning watershed conservation Benchmarking Indicators for “State of the Basin” Detailed Monitoring Framework for B.3 Role sharing Draft MoU and Annexes Gap Analysis between Requirements of Rencana and Deliverables of TA 7189

DHV, Deltares, MLD

ii



GLOSSARY 6 Cis RBT ADB AM Balai PSDA BAPPEDA BAPPENAS BBWS BLU BTA 155 BWRMC BWRMP BWRP CDAP CMT CRB CRBOM CSO DAS DGWR DMI FEWS\HYMOS FHM FMSB GDP GIS GOI GWP HRM ICWRMIP IWRM JABOTABEK JABODETABEK JSM JWRMS MFF MIS MOHA MPW NARBO NGO O&M ODS PBPB PISP PJT II PODES PPTPA PSDA PTPA PusAir RBMO RBT RCMU RIBASIM Sawah DHV, Deltares, MLD

River Basin territory of Cidanau, Ciujung, Cidurian + Ciliwung, Cisadane + Citarum Asian Development Bank Asset Management WRM Centre (at Provincial level) Local Government Planning Board National Planning Board Greater Basin Territory Centre (Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai), at MPW level Public Service Organization, can collect charges Cisadane - Cimanuk Integrated Water Resources Development project Strategic WRM Planning project in Indonesia (1985 – 1991) Basin Water Resources Management Council 1) Basin Water Resources Management Plan (Rencana) 2) Project for formulation of BWRMP (2001 – 2004) Basin Water Resources Planning (1996 – 2001, later changed to BWRMP) Capacity Development Action Plan Change Management Team Citarum River Basin Centre for River Basin Organizations and Management Community Society Organization or NGO Daerah Aliran Sungai, Watershed, River Basin Directorate General for Water Resources at MPW Domestic, Municipal and Industrial (water demand) Hydrological data processing system based on Flood Early Warning System Flood Hazard Mapping, component under Jakarta Flood Management (2007 – 2010) Flood Management in Selected Basins (2004 – 2005) Gross Domestic Product Geographic Information System Government of Indonesia Global Water Platform Human Resources Management Integrated Citarum WRM Investment program Integrated Water Resources Management Area comprising Jakarta, Bogor, Tangerang, Bekasi Area comprising Jakarta, Bogor, Depok Tangerang, Bekasi Java Spatial Model JABOTABEK WRM Study Multi-tranche Facilitation Facility (for ADB loans) Management Information System Ministry of Home Affairs Ministry of Public Works Network for Asian River Basin Organizations Non Government Organization Operation and Maintenance Organizational Development Specialist Performance Benchmarking for Physical Basins Participatory Irrigation Sector Project National Corporation for Basin Management (for Citarum) Data Base with statistical data at desa level Present form of Water Resources Council at Basin Level WRM Present form of Water Resources Council at Provincial Level Agency for Research and Development in Water Resources, under MPW River Basin Management Organization River Basin Territory (Wilayah Sungai, WS) Road Map Coordination Management Unit River Basin Simulation Model, Decision Support System for WR planning /management Rice Field iii


SMP TA TAMP TKPSDA WB WISMP WRM WRMC WTC

DHV, Deltares, MLD


Strategic Water Resources Management Plan, (Pola) Technical Assistance Total Asset Management Program Coordination Team for WRM (Basin WRM Council) World Bank Water Resources and Irrigation Sector Management program Water Resources Management WRM Council West Tarum Canal

iv



1.

TA 7189-INO PACKAGE B SUMMARY

1.1.

Introduction

Institutional Strengthening for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in the 6 Cis (six rivers) River Basin Territory (RBT) (TA 7189-INO) is located NW Java, comprising the metropolitan cities of Jakarta and Bandung and its surroundings. Component B, the subject of this report, is concerning institutional strengthening of government institutions and civil service organizations for planning of IWRM. Several sub-components are identified: B1A Institutional Strengthening for IWRM in 6 Cis RBT B1B IWRM Planning in 6 Cis RBT covering strategic management planning resulting in a Pola, and preparation of a Master Plan (Rencana) B2 Strategic Spatial Planning in 6 Cis RBT B3 Development of Key Policies and Strategies for IWRM Implementation of Sub-component B1 started on November 11, 2009 and is intended to continue for 36 months until end of December 2012. An extra scope of work has been added, starting April 2012, and will be completed before end of December 2012. Implementation of Sub-component B2 started on February 15, 2010, and was completed after 18 months in August 2011. The draft final report for B.2 has been distributed in May 2012. An extension of Sub-component B.2 started at the end of April and will continue until September 2012. Sub-component B3 started in November 2009 and delivered final results in June 2011 The draft final report for B.3 (Vol B.3 -11 and 12, concerning water allocation and ground water) was submitted in June 2011, comments were received, and the final version will be submitted in September 2012. Still some follow up activities are implemented for B.3. This tenth Quarterly Progress Report presents the status on 31 August 2012 and progress achieved during the last four months of project implementation. It also presents an indication of developments and issues affecting implementation. Each sub-component is dealt with in chapters 2 (sub-component B.1), 3 (B.2) and 4 (B.3), respectively, while general project implementation is discussed in chapter 5.

1.2.

Developments during this period

1.2.1 Sub-component B.1 A major factor influencing the work for B.1 was the issuance of KEPPRES 12/2012 dated 18 April 2012, about the delineation of River Basin Territories (RBT or WS). As expected, the former RBT of 6 Cis was split in three new RBTs, according to the working areas of the three BBWS (Citarum, Ciliwung-Cisadane and 3 Cis). However, since this was done before legalization of the Pola for 6 Cis RBT, which had been endorsed by TKPSDA for 6Cis RBT in December 2011, the process of Pola and Rencana formulation was seriously disrupted. It is clear that the complicated function of the three new RBTs for water supply of Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia, requires an integrated plan (POLA Induk) for the whole 6 Cis area. This is provided in the Pola as endorsed by the TKPSDA in December 2011, and specifically mentioned in the KEPPRES 12/2012. However, now three new Pola have to be formulated for each new RBT, and to be endorsed by the new TKPSDAs to be established. It is intended to arrange this through preparation of three volumes for each new RBT, with specific sections concerning (i) general description of the RBT and (2) proposed measures for conservation, flood management, community participation and spatial planning, and generic sections for (3) proposed measures for utilization and data & information management. DHV, Deltares, MLD

1



Moreover, a crash program has started to establish the three new TKPSDAs. It took more than one year before the TKPSDA for 6 Cis was established in December 2010 under KEPMEN PU 594/KPTS/M/2010, and another year to endorse the Pola for 6 Cis in December 2011. But the experience gained and the high motivation of DGWR is very condusive to establish the new TKPSDAs at the end of October 2012, and endorsement of the Polas before the end of 2012. It is unclear how this will affect the completion of the RENCANA for 6 Cis before the POlas have been legalized. The intention is that the consultants will assist the three BBWS to finalize the draft integrated RENCANA. This will be done in three volumes as also indicated for the Polas. Consultants of the 6 Cis team will assist BBWS during discussion with the stakeholders Public Consultation Meetings in each new RBT, if these are held before October 2012. The BBWS will finalize the three RENCANAs for each new RBT with the new TKPSDA afterwards in 2013. During this period most of the work for B.1 focused on preparation of the 6 Cis Rencana. The plan is envisaged to be completed four months behind schedule in November 2012. Because essential parts of the Rencana, especially the actions required for 2013, have been discussed with the BBWS in July 2012, this information has been available for inclusion in the proposed Annual Working Plans and budgets for 2013. Unfortunately, the required Public Consultation Meetings (PCM) could not be organized as envisaged in June 2012 because the BBWS had not ime, or could not use the budget allocated for 6 Cis anymore (because that did not exist anymore after the split). No delay of the final completion date (December 2012) is envisaged,, although additional resources are required to cope with the extra resources used during the extended Pola process and additional requirements concerning more intensive guidance and water quality in the upper Citarum basin, as proposed during the ADB review mission and confirmed in the proposed Variation Order 4 during discussions with Indonesia Resident Mission in April 2012. See also below under major issues, and chapter 5 logistics. Concerning the additional water quality component, the Water and Sanitation Program (WSP) in the World bank offered to provide extra assistance through provision of an economist, who has extensive experience in assessing the benefits of sanitation, and he started this assistance July 2012, with results envisaged for September 2012.

1.2.2 Sub-component B.2 Most of the additional activities envisaged for B.2 were completed in this period. The extension includes three activities as follows: A. Support the TA Rencana WRM process with spatial planning input B. Support integration of water zoning in the spatial planning process C. Intensive transfer of knowledge for water zoning tools The extension of subcomponent B2 was coordinated closely with the development of the content of the Rencana of the 6Ci’s RBT in subcomponent B1. Subcomponent B1 plans to finish the development of the draft content of the Rencana in June 2012. Hence the extension work for B2 started in April 2012 and was finished in June 2012, except for activity A which continues the Rencana support up to September.

1.2.3 Sub-component B.3 For B.3 the major activities have been completed in February 2011. The results on groundwater based on the Bandung workshop on November 2nd 2010 and the results on surface water management for Jatiluhur based on the Bandung workshop on February 17th DHV, Deltares, MLD

2



2011 are summarized in clear recommendations to be followed up under TA 7189 or under next programs. The draft final reports have been submitted on June 30 2011, and ADB provided comments. Also some comments have been received from the Provincial Dinases for (1) Water Resources, as well as for (2) Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM), which is in charge of groundwater. This was further discussed in this period, and the final versions will be submitted in September 2012. An extra study concerning pricing of water supply services to Jakarta has been done from June – December 2011, resulting in a methodology to establish pricing mechanisms, with focus on the situation concerning water supply from Citarum river to the water supply company of Jakarta through the West Tarum Canal, as an example for other situations. The final report, published in February 2012, has been used as reference by the existing working group with representatives from several institutions for formulation of such mechanisms (Tim Tariff). Furthermore, discussions were held with the three stakeholders in the Citarum basin, PJT II, BBWS and West Java Provincial Agency for Water Resources, on a formal arrangement for role distribution. This is necessary to delineate the responsibilities during emergencies, as occurred during Eid ul Fitr in 2011, as well as for implementation of development and O&M. The results are discussed in chapter 4.

1.3.

Major Issues

1.3.1 Split of 6 Cis RBT By decree of the President (KEPPRES 12/2012) the original 6Ci RBT has been split in three new RBT, based on the working areas of the three River Basin Organizations (BBWS) established in the area. As indicated above this has major impacts on (i) Pola and (ii) Rencana, as well as (iii) functioning of the TKPSDA. The Pola for 6 Cis has not been legalized before issuing KEPPRES 12/2012 as previous assumed. Therefore it now has to be replaced by three new Polas for each new RBT. The existing Pola will function as a “Pola Induk”, an integrated framework as reference for the specific Pola and Rencana in the new RBT It is intended that this “Pola Induk” will be covered by a circulating letter (Surat Edaran), signed by the DG for Water Resources. The formulation of Pola for each new RBT is relatively simple, and could be done by the consultants, requiring three additional person months, envisaged to be provided from contingencies in the budget for the 6 Cis project. However, it also requires endorsement by still to be established TKPSDA, and this could require some changes. At the other hand this chance is low, because it is envisaged that the same non-government persons will be involved as earlier participated as members of the TKPSDA for 6 Cis. The Rencana Induk will be formulated in three volumes specific for each RBT, and with generic chapters for Water Utlization (requires integration and coordinated management between the three RBT) and data management. This will require some extra efforts, but that will be covered by revisions under the existing contract. Public Consultation meetings are for stakeholders in general, and not depending on establishment of TKPSDA. However, assistance during endorsement by TKPSDA has not been envisaged in the contract. Moreover, it is not possible anymore to incorporate major changes in the Rencana if the final Polas require that. Three new TKPSDA have to be established in the new RBTs. The consultants do not have adequate resources anymore to assist in that.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

3



1.3.2 Hydrological Database The additional hydrological database is unreliable. A reliable set of data is available from BTA 155, which has been checked rigorously. Additional rainfall data from 176 rainfall station for the years 1979 – 2009 have been validated and checked. Comparing average rainfall from the data set of BTA 155 with the results from the additional rainfall stations indicated that the latter was approximately 15% lower. However, this is not an indication of climate change, because verification of this phenomenon in four rainfall stations with long time series, did not indicate a change in rainfall. This is reported in Annex D.

1.3.3 State of the Basin A preliminary version of the tool for performance benchmarking of the physical state of the basin has been prepared, and has been discussed with the BBWS for Citarum. Some updates are to be included, but no priority has been given by the BBWS Citarum for a trial implementation in 2012 for the upper Citarum Basin as a pilot test for wider application.

1.3.4 Completion of sub-component B.3 Completion of B.3 has been postponed, because gradually more comments on the final reports were sent to the consultants. This will be completed in next reporting period..

1.4.

Logistics

All counterparts from PU, comprising two (three were originally envisaged) from DG for Spatial Planning, two from DGWR Jakarta and two from each BBWS, have participated in implementation of Package B. They all have good education (S.1 and S.2) and high motivation, and participated in trainings implemented for Package B. However, it should be noted that this staff is not full-time available, which is limiting the transfer of knowledge, and the skills of the counterparts to replicate the work of the consultants. Office space was provided in Jakarta in the former building of Directorate of Rivers, with all facilities such as furniture, water, electricity and telephone lines. The building is slowly deteriorating and will soon be demolished, which sometimes affects the work, such as during floods. Office space in Bandung is adequate, although there is no fixed telephone line, and all furniture and some equipment has been provided by DHV. Three variation orders have been proposed and approved. Each one was meant to cope with changes identified under the inception report (VO I), the review mission in Sept/Oct 2010 (VO 2), and the review mission of April/May 2011, including price escalation (VO 3). A fourth one, covering the extension with additional funds, has been submitted on April 15, 2012 and approved on September 7, 2012. Because most of the results from this extension are needed in the Rencana, to be ready in preliminary form in June 2012, the work already started in early May. Some very urgent matters have been included in the already approved Variation Order 3, as reported in Chapter 5. Another Variation Order no.5 will be proposed to cope with the extra requirements after splitting up 6 Cis RBT.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

4



2.

SUBCOMPONENT B1 INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING AND PLANNING

2.1.

Status of B.1 Tasks

Status of the Tasks for B.1 and achieved progress during the last three months is indicated in the revised Project Design and Monitoring Framework (DMF) as presented in Table 2.1 on the next pages. It has been expanded with additional activities as covered under VO4, as shown in the third page of Table 2.1.

2.2.

Developments and Key Findings for Component B.1A

2.2.1 Task B.1-1 Stakeholders assessment and counterpart training The activities mainly concentrated on assessing the impacts of KEPPRES 12/2012, and the related split in 6 Cis, on the Pola, Rencana and TKPSDA. The TKPSDA for 6 Cis was established in December 2010 under KEPMEN PU 594/KPTS/M/2010, and endorsed the Pola for 6 Cis in December 2011. Because of the split, three new TKPSDA have to be established. Because the Pola for 6 Cis has not been legalized yet, the new Polas have to be endorsed by the new to be established TKPSDA. During several meetings a crash program has been developed for establishment in a very short period. Because of the experience gained, the familiarity with NGOs in the project area developed in the years before, and the high motivation of DGWR and the BBWS, it is still possible to have the new TKPSDA established end of October, and endorse the TKPSDA before the end of 2012. Arrangements can be quickly adapted, because most members are representatives from one of the three areas, as shown in note 2 of the box in Annex C. Some people will be members of two TKPSDA. But the weakness is that there is no coordinating platform for issues beyond one RBT, such as water supply to Jakarta and efforts in upstream Citarum (watershed and water quality protection) for the benefit of the people living in Jakarta. Therefore it is proposed to continue the work of TKPSDA 6 Cis as an umbrella platform for three more local platforms in the working areas of the three BBWS or new RBT. A special training program has been set up for the counterparts from DGWR, as reported in Annex B: Training report. The consultants started the more intensive on-the-job training in January, but this had to be discontinued again in June, since the counterparts do not have enough time.

2.2.2 Task B.1-2 Institutional Strengthening A. Required capacity of BBWS depends on role sharing agreements Earlier inventories in the BBWS revealed that there is a wide variation in perceptions on how the various tasks for IWRM have to be distributed among the various agencies involved, and how the various tasks and responsibilities have to be implemented. This concentrates on questions as how much mandate is given to the provinces through comanagement (Tugas Perbantuan-TP), how much is done by own staff or by out-sourcing, who is responsible in case of emergencies etc. This became more urgent after there was disagreement on who should pay for emergency measures after a disaster occurred in the West Tarum Canal on September 1, 2011.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

5



Table 2.1 Revised Project Design and Monitoring Framework for sub-component B.1 Design Summary  Task B.1.1 Ongoing support for Water Resources Council (WRC) and supporting office(s),

 Task B.1.2 Improved capacity of river basin management agencies (RBMOs).  Strengthened Balai Besar for three sub-basins

 Task B1.3:Internet-based meta-database for water, land and related data in Citarum River Basin

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Performance Targets/Indicators  Water Resources Council operating effectively and making appropriate decisions and recommendations to GOI (2011).

 Capacity of river basin management agencies to make decisions in an IWRM context improved (2010).  All three Balai Besar strengthened in areas of: (i) Leadership / teamwork, (ii) human resources management, (iii) financial planning and management (2012)  Meta-database designed, implemented and operational (2010)

Status 31 August 2012  WRC in provinces established as follows: - West Java per March 2010, Operating effectively. - DKI Jakarta per Feb. 2010, operating effectively - Banten: established in 2006, not operating effectively, again changing its member composition.  Basin Council (TKPSDA) established per KEPMEN PU 594/KPTS/M/2010 per 16 December 2010 (See Annex C). Approved draft Pola in December 2011. .  Stakeholder analysis report in whole RBT finalized.  No follow up on CDAPs and CMT as formulated under TA 4381-INO, Clear task distribution between BBWS and provinces, as well as PJT 2 in Citarum under preparation. Official policy from DGWR is in preparation.  Functional Analysis of DGWR and Balais resulted in reorganization in early 2011, but is still under assessment for complete application.  Performance Benchmarking of BBWS completed   Counterparts from DGWR and BBWS participated in training courses and on-the-job training by consultants.  Website (6Cis.org) has been established with general access to general information, reports and minutes of meeting, and more restricted access for persons involved in the project for more detailed information  Data collected based on guidelines for Pola preparation (KepMen 22/2009) and the current guidelines for Rencana preparation.  Asset management system has been tested in Ciujung basin, and found unsuitable for application without further training of water resources agency staff. Current implementation is weak, especially data input verification.

Planning till end of project December 2012  Routine support for provincial councils in West Java and Jakarta, but special support needed to improve functioning of provincial water council in Banten  Final session of TKPSDA 6 Cis in August 2012  Establishment of new TKPSDA in October 2012  Discussion of new Pola for each new RBT in November –December 2012  Stakeholder analysis update for new TKPSDA.  Facilitate finalization of Role distribution agreement in Citarum RBT, as example for wider application in other RBT.  Assess impact of reorganization for DGWR and Balais in 6 Cis RBT  Assess follow up of Performance Benchmarking and potential and needs for Capacity Building  Final training of counterparts in September / October 2012  Website to be established, integrated in PU website, will be named “enamci/pu.go.id ( need approval from PU)  Meta data base system based on Dublin-core standards, with access through the RCMU website  Formulate recommendations for improvement of Asset Management system and its application in final report

6



Table 2.1 Revised Project Design and Monitoring Framework for sub-component B.1 (continued) Design Summary  Task B1.4: Effective decision support tool for use by relevant agencies for water planning.

 Task B.1-5 Pola and Rencana for 6 Cis River Basin Territory.

Performance Targets/Indicators Decision support tool designed, implemented and accessible to all relevant agencies and their staff (2010)

Status 31 August 2012  HYMOS/FEWS and RIBASIM available  A lot of data and modeling framework is available from earlier projects, and incorporated in the present models.  Additional recent hydrological data proved to be not reliable enough to be incorporated in the Rencana  Water balance model has been updated for climate change, link with the Java Spatial Model and land use (subcomponent B.2, see chapter 3) and recent infrastructure  Training has been done for the counterparts and selected staff in application of these models in training events and during on the job training  Pola (2011) and Rencana  Framework for Pola and Rencana available (2012) for 6Cis RBT completed  Final draft Pola has been approved by TKPSDA and DGWR and approved by GOI, and and is now processed for legalization by minister for PU. implementation commenced  Summary of draft Pola available on website 6cis.org, and included as Annex D  Consultants now continuing with preparation of the Rencana

 Recommendations for  Reports with recommendations improved technical capacity: for further work to improve (i) flood warning & realtechnical capacity prepared time communication, and submitted (2011) (ii) management and data information systems, (iii) quantity and quality monitoring of flow and regulation for efficient water allocation.  Recommendations on  Reports on recommendations for improved institutional improved institutional framework framework for O&M of water for O&M of water infrastructure infrastructure prepared and submitted and endorsed by DGWR (2010)  RENCANA recommendations included for investment program under national budget in 2013

DHV, Deltares, MLD

 Partly incorporated in the Pola  This will also be part of analysis for the Rencana (2012).  Water quality component proposed to be added through VO4

Planning till end of project December 2012

 Further updating the 6 Cis water balance model for land use (updated spatial plans)  Further training of counterparts and other relevant staff in use of these models  Application of the framework  No further involvement by consultants .  Assessing measures proposed in Pola with cost and benefit analyses, and indicating priorites  Start preparation of final report for B.1, based on findings during preparation of Pola and Rencana related to technical capacity.  Proposed technical improvements will be published as part of the report on Rencana (June 2012)  Water quality component implemented in upper Citarum area (Greater Bandung area).

 This depends on agreed task distributions between various agencies. A special effort to agree on role distribution between the various WRM institutions in the lower Citarum basin has been done and is envisaged to be concluded in July 2012 (chapter 4)

 Finalization of additional study on the task distribution between the BBWS, PJT II and province and district agencies concerning O&M for Water Resources infrastructure in the Jatiluhur scheme (lower Citarum)

 These recommendations have been discussed with the BBWS and can be included in the budget for 2013. However, the required public consultation meetings, envisaged for June 2012, have not been held yet.

 Organization of public consultation meetings in September 2012  Finalization of Rencana in November 2012  Inclusion of relevant parts in Budget of 2013

7



Table 2.1 Revised Project Design and Monitoring Framework for sub-component B.1 (continued) Design Summary  Task B.1-6: Annual "state of the basin" reporting system.

Performance Targets/Indicators "State of the basin" reporting system in place and reports being produced and submitted annually

 Task B.1-7: More intensive technical support to the 3 river basin organizations to prepare their respective RENCANAs

Timely RENCANA formulation and increased capacity of Balai Besar staff to operate model and prepare master plans

 Task B1-8 Improved water quality assessment in upper Citarum basin 6Cis and include this in the 6 Cis RBT water resources management master plans (RENCANA) and recommendations for investment

 Main investment programmed to improve water quality and increased coordination with related agencies (Ministry of Environment, Human Settlement and Housing, Ministry of Public Works)

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Planning till end of project December 2012  Further discussion on methodology for“State of the basin” reporting to be completed in July 2012. Implementation envisaged in OctoberNovember 2012. if additional budget becomes available.  Preliminary draft Rencana has been formulated in June 2012, - Public Consultation Meetings in Sept. 2012 but Public Consultation Meetings not held in June 2012 - Finalization of draft Rencana in November 2012 - No further involvement of consultant in  Intensive guidance has been done from January – June 2012, legalization through TKPSDA but had to be stopped after that, because not enough time with the counterparts



Status 31 August 2012 Preliminary design of questionnaire is presented in Annex E.

 Main investment program for improved water quality in the upper part of Citarum has been formulated.  Cooperation with BPLHD of West Java has been started  Ministry of Public Works (Cipta Karya) has been informed  Ministry of Environment did not have time yet to discuss.

 Assessment of benefits of improved water quality to improve motivation for investments in water quality improvement  Investment program endorsed by Provincial Government of West Java (BAPPEDA and Agency for Settlement and housing)  )Improved coordination with Ministry of Public Works (Cipta Karya) and Ministry of Environment (unknown Assistant Minister)

8



At the request of the BBWS a study is proposed concerning task distribution between BBWS Citarum, PJT II, and the provincial Water Management Agency. Several meetings have been held, and now a draft MOU concerning the role distribution has been prepared and should be signed by the heads of related agencies. This is envisaged in September 2012. It was decided that a general direction from DGWR is not applicable, because the lower Citarum area is very specific, and is better served with an MoU between the various parties involved. However, this MoU needs renewal every year. B. Joint Cooperation in mitigation of catchment degradation A special issue related to role sharing is the mitigation of upper catchment degradation. Much has been said about mitigation of upper catchment degradation, considerable funds are available, but not much has been achieved. This is partly because it is not so much about what has to be done in technical matters, but rather how this should be done in a sustainable way. Many trees have been planted, but cut again in the next years. Therefore, a suitable tactical method has to be found to ensure participation of the local community and sustain the technical interventions until the intended impact has been achieved. This is essential, because catchment conservation and rehabilitation is one of the cheaper measures to contribute to less floods and more water availability in the dry season. An excellent inventory has been made by the Balai Pengelolaan DAS from Ministry of Forestry for the 6 Cis area. They have divided the area in several typical sub-areas with identical main features and identified what could be done to mitigate catchment degradation for each type. Priorities can be based on classification in the extend of deterioration, divided in five classes of critical areas, ranging from very critical to not critical. The Balai PDAS has prepared a comprehensive technical plan to mitigate degradation for the various types of soils and land ownership (RTkRHL) for the whole of 6 Cis (all three new RBTs), and additional tools were provided under component B.2. As such, the technical part is covered. Concerning the tactical part an excellent example is available from the initiatives taken by “Hijau Lestari”, a cooperation between Perhutani, PJT II and others, to assist farmers in planting coffe plants, fruit trees and trees for wood production at critical areas. The farmers are assisted during three years, when the coffee plants yield the first harvest. More of these initiatives are needed, and integrated into the activities of the government institutions`. Moreover, initially the plans and tools developed by the Balai PDAS were not taken over by the various institutions, especially the Dinas Pertanian dan Kehutanan, responsible at provincial and kabupaten level. Together with Package A we started to raise awareness about these potential tools and funds available in the Bandung area, especially through cooperation with the provincial BAPPEDA and Dinases for Forestry and Agriculture, and the district BAPPEDA and Dinas for Forestry and Agriculture (one Dinas) in West Bandung. This resulted in establishment of a special task force (SPOKI) for more cooperation and initiatives for joint projects in 2012 (see text box). This resulted in several projects started up in 2012 (pilot project for Mekarsari, research project Anjarsari by BPDAS) and further preparation for projects in 2013. More detailed information in Annex E C. New delineation of River Basin territories On April 18 2012 KEPPRES 12/2012 has been issued about the delineation of River Basin Territories (RBT or WS). As expected, the former RBT of 6 Cis was split in three new RBTs, according to the working areas of the three BBWS (Citarum, Ciliwung-Cisadane and 3 Cis). This had serious impacts on the legalization of the Pola of 6 Cis, because this RBT has no legal entity anymore. At the other hand it is clear that the complicated function of the three new RBTs for water supply of Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia, requires an integrated plan (POLA Induk and Rencana Induk) for the whole 6 Cis area. This is specifically stated in the KEPPRES 12/2012 and provided in the Pola approved by the TKPSDA in December 2011. This is further dealt with in section 2.3.3. DHV, Deltares, MLD

9



The TKPSDA for 6 Cis has been disbanded, and new TKPSDAs for each new RBT have to be established. This requires time and effort, and the consultants do not have enough resources anymore to assist in establishment as much as before. Moreover, coordination of the three TKPSDAs should have special arrangements. The weakness is that there is no coordinating platform for the issues beyond one RBT, such as water supply to Jakarta and efforts in upstream Citarum (management of watershed protection and water quality) for the benefit of the people living in Jakarta. D. Intensive on-the-job training for counterparts The intensive training, on the job at the location of the counterparts, has been started in January, and for several months full rounds have been made to all BBWS. However, in July we stopped this type of training, because the counterparts are still too much involved in many project activities, and therefore cannot devote sufficient time to the transfer of knowledge concerning Pola and Rencana preparation.

2.3.

Developments/Key Findings in Sub-Component B.1B

2.3.1 Task B.1-3 Web-based Meta Data Base Task B.1-3 concerns development of an Internet Based Meta-database. DGWR has several ongoing programs concerning development of water resources databases and information systems, and it has been agreed that 6 Cis project will establish a project web site with the name sda.pu.go.id/enamcis, hosted at Water Resources Data Centre (WRDC) / PUSDATA PU. This project web site (MIS) would provide a (public/restricted) platform for sharing documents (minutes of meetings, project reports, etc) and other information in the form of tables and maps. Additional content can easily be added during the project. This web-site is still under development, to comply with all requirements of DGWR. On May 31 2011 a temporary web-site has been launched, providing this information. This site is available at 6Cis.org, but problems with the infrastructure in the old office building of PU have complicated access to this site. Therefore it will be investigated whether access to this site can be arranged through the web-site of RCMU (Cita-Citarum).

2.3.2 Task B.1-4 Decision Support Systems (Water Balance Model) A. Hydrological Data Because of using FEWS/HYMOS and RIBASIM, already a functioning water balance model is available, with validated data from time series 1951 – 1979. This has been used for the Pola.. The original model has been updated, and data converted. Additional time-series, from 1980–2009, became available, which have been checked and validated. This is time consuming because location of most of the new stations is not indicated clearly, and for many periods data are missing, or show dubious results. Of the original 1000 stations only 176 stations have been selected, because most of the stations did not have more than 3 years consecutive records and 70 of the selected stations did not pass the reliability test (double mass curve). A comparison was made of average rainfall based on the reliable data base of BTA 155, which had gone through rigorous checking, and the rainfall according to the additional data base. This indicated that the average value of the additional rainfall data show a significant deviation from the average rainfall data from the original data base of BTA 155, and rainfall according to BTA 155 was some 15% higher than the rainfall recorded from the additional stations, This is not confirmed by findings from stations with long time series, such as Jakarta, Bandung, Jatiluhur (See Annex D). This may be caused by missing data, which were indicated as o values, or because less rainfall station from higher elevations are present in the additional data base.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

10



The conclusion is that the additional hydrological data concerning rainfall are not suitable for inclusion in the design process, because: 1. Biased spatial distribution: some areas have more stations than other areas, and in principle the number of rainfall stations located in areas with higher elevations is much less thank compared to data from BTA 155 2. Poor performance of the rainfall stations which are available: only 250 stations were having sufficiently long records, compared to 400 during BTA 155, and missing data in these stations were 50%, compared to 50% in BTA 155. 3. Analysis of rainfall data from five stations with long duration did not show a significant trend. Therefore we considered the data for 1950 -1979 more reliable than the additional data, and will not use them for the simulations with the decision support model.. B. Water Balance Model Findings with the water balance model are as follows: 1. The project area is blessed with ample water resources. However, water demand, and in particular Domestic, Municipal and Industrial (DMI) water demand, increased dramatically. With the existing water distribution system, shortages occur, in particular in the dry season. At this moment DMI demand is still low (see figure 2.1), because the coverage of piped system is still low. But in line with the Millennium Development Goals the coverage of piped water supply will be increased from the present 40% to the future 70% of urban population, raising also the DMI demands.

Id

9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Cluster Cilegon, Kab. & Kota Serang Lebak & Pandeglang Tangerang : Kabupaten+Kota+TangSel DKI Jakarta Cekungan Bandung Bekasi (Kab/Kota) Kerawang + Purwakarta+Subang Kota Bogor Kab. Bogor Kota Depok

SIPA 2010 (m3/sc) 5.14 0.42 5.91 19.96 1.74 3.22 5.45 0.71 1.28 0.24

2010 2030 (100% (100% Coverage) Coverage) 5.6 7.97 2.0 2.6 13.7 19.7 38.5 41.6 18.6 22.5 11.1 15.0 10.0 13.3 2.7 3.6 11.4 15.2 1.9 6.7

Figure 2.1 Water Demand from DMI at current levels (green), and based on MDGs (2010, 2030)

2. While irrigated agriculture can adapt cropping patterns or reduce cultivated area to cope with reduced water availability, DMI water supply needs to be continued even during the dry season and with a higher reliability than irrigation supply. An example is the DMI water supply to Tangerang: even though irrigation water demands at the Pasar Baru weir for the Cisadane irrigation scheme have been dramatically reduced because of urbanization, DMI water supply is not meeting the required service level. 3. On top of that, pollution rendered certain water sources unfit for DMI water supply. Examples include the rivers crossing West Tarum Canal (Cibeet, Cikarang and Bekasi), leading to the need for siphons or increased pressure on groundwater.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

11



4. While resources may be sufficient to meet demand, it is necessary to bring the water from the source to the demand centre. Existing and proposed extra conveyance systems are presented in Figure 2.2. DI DI Cisadane Cisadane + + Cidurian Cidurian (13.100ha) (13.100ha)

6.7

6.2 6.2

1166

38 8 1.

Pasir Kopo

2

Bogor

2.2 2.2

66.5 WTC

DI DI Jatiluhur Jatiluhur

55

(176.700ha) (176.700ha)

ETC

Depok

Lim o

Salak countour

NTC

3 30 0 16

55.. 44

Pondok Benda

Cilawang

15

41.6

22 33.. 3 0.5

Karawang Purwakarta Subang

Unregulated: -Citereup

13.3

Ca na l2

Jatiluhur Narogong

(kab.kab.-kota) kota)

18.8 4

Unregulated: -Katulampa Genteng 2 -Empang

2

Meninggikan +15m3/s

Cirata 2025

Sukawana Cimeta

2 1.

: Strategy C Saguling

: Strategy D

4 4 00..88

88 00.. Santosa Cisangkuy

1

Cikapundung

1.4 6

Karian

7 7 Tanjung

5

19. 4

14.6 14.6

9.2

4 12.4 12.

7 7

DKI Jakarta

19.7

2.2 2.2

Sindang Heula

Bekasi

Tangerang

7

(15.600ha)

0. 5

Cidanau

7.97 2.6

4.8

4 4

+ 0. 8

4 4

Serang Cilegon, Cilegon, Lebak, Lebak, DI Ciujung Ciujung DI Pandeglang (15.600ha)

0. 8( irr )

Krenceng (Meninggikan)

Bandung

22.5

0.8 Citarik

Fix flow Cibatrua 2015

Figure 2.2 Present and future reservoirs and conveyance systems.

2.3.3 Task B.1-5 Basin Planning,Development of Pola: A. Formulation of the Pola The final draft Pola was presented to BBWS in July, 2011. In December 2011 TKPSDA endorsed the draft Pola after some slight amendments. However, the Minister of MPW did not legalize the Pola before the split in three new RBT, and now three new Pola have to be formulated for each new RBT. The draft Pola also has been discussed with Spatial Planning coordinating boards (BKPRD) in the three provinces (Banten, West Java and DKI Jakarta). Aim is to make them aware about the special requirements for Water Resources aspects in the spatial plans (RTRW) for province, districts and cities. These are concerning space required for rivers, reservoirs and water ways, as well as special zones for water retention and soil protection zones, or with specific building codes such as for flooded areas, areas important for water retention or vulnerable for erosion. It should be noted that more provisions have been made in the final versions, especially for highly productive irrigated agricultural areas and for rivers, than in the versions of the RTRW we originally obtained. B. Main Findings of the Pola A first major point of attention concerns water supply of Jakarta and Bandung. Jakarta retrieves only 0.4 m3/s from its own water resources to its water supply company PAM Jaya. At present 16 m3/s raw water is supplied from Citarum river through the West Tarum Canal, and 3 m3/s treated water is supplied from Cisadane. More water is needed now and in 2030. These figures include fasing out use of groundwater over time and are generally accepted and confirmed by the water supply companies and supervising bodies. Increased supplies are possible by providing extra infrastructure, as indicated in Figure 2.2, and these have been included in the Pola. The Rencana further works this out, with a comparison in cost, environmental and social impacts for each option, leading to prioritization (see under E of this section).

DHV, Deltares, MLD

12



Also in Bandung needs are much higher than present supply capacity. At present only some 2 m3/s is supplied through PDAM, while our estimates indicate that, when standards from Cipta Karya are fully applied, already some 22 m3/s is needed. But these standards are high, and assume a demand of 190 l per day & per capita for metropolitan areas, full coverage and no use of groundwater. At the moment supply is in the order of 60l/day/capita, only 40% is reached, and still much groundwater is used. Therefore the water supply to Bandung has to be upgraded in stages, starting with moderate standards first and gradually upgrading to full standards in the far future. To realize this, extra local surface water resources should be developed, and the obvious source is the Saguling reservoir. This was confirmed in a Master Plan for water supply development in Bandung formulated by PU- Cipta Karya. However, this requires pumping water from this reservoir to some 100m higher elevation, and a serious start with waste water treatment along Citarum. The second major point of attention is flood management. This comprises mainly dredging of heavily sedimented rivers near Bandung and in the lower parts of the catchments, soil conservation in the upper catchments, and non-structural measures such as flood warning and flood preparation (see also spatial planning below). Other points of attention comprise additional issues, as discussed below: a. soil conservation b. water quality c. data and information d. public participation and institutional development e. spatial planning Priority for soil conservation should be given especially in the upper Citarum river, to preserve the reservoir capacity of the Saguling reservoir. This capacity is rapidly reducing because of sedimentation of soils eroded from the upper catchment, and requires urgent action, at a large scale, as this is the source for Bandung and Jakarta. Preliminary estimates indicate that some 190 M US$ each year might be lost if Saguling cannot function anymore, while the cost of protecting upper Citarum catchment are only a one time investment of 79 M US$ The present initiatives from Forestry in cooperation with PU and Agriculture can be used, upgrading to a much wider scale. This is addressed in cooperation with Package A as reported above, and we are also contributing through our conservation specialist and the special study for upper Citarum basin conservation. For water quality major shifts in paradigm and large investments are required, to address the present pollution from domestic and industrial waste in the Bandung area, because this affects the water source for the 25 million people living in and around Jakarta, as well as the 10 million living around Bandung. Aim is treating waste water from all industries and settlements before it flows into the Citarum. A beginning should be made with all new urban developments, to ensure that they apply adequate standards for sewerage and urban drainage, to avoid that major investments have to be made again later. This is included in the Pola, but requires much extra efforts. Present efforts are focused on self monitoring by the industries and regular checks by the Environmental Management Board. What is needed is an analysis whether the reported discharges by the industries are confirming the presently recorded discharges, or are significantly under-estimating present loads. This has been incorporated in the Rencana for the upper Citarum area. For data and information also major attention is needed. As reported above the quality of the records is low, and there is hardly follow up on provided records to check, validate and/or efforts to improve data recording. Community Participation and Institutional Strengthening are major fields of attention in the Pola, and there is much potential to improve the present situation.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

13



Spatial Planning also needs proper attention. If requirements for the water sector are adequately incorporated in the spatial plans (RTRW), based on the zones as indicated in A, a sound basis exists to implement the policies proposed. In the current version of most RTRW space has been provided for the major rivers and highly productive irrigated agriculture areas, but many of the present and new reservoirs are not indicated, nor are there adequate provisions for zoning of vulnerable areas for erosion and water retention or flood prone areas. This is a serious omission and could be a missed chance. This is the subject of the additional activities of sub-sector b.2 as reported in chapter 3. C. Scenarios The following scenarios and strategies have been endorsed for the Pola and Rencana by the TKPSDA for 6 Cis. In Permen 22/2009 Pola require three scenarios for (1) economy, (2) climate change and (3) politics. It was agreed to apply this for 6 Cis through four parameters, as follows:  Population growth  Economic growth  Climate change  Orientation of the national politics (Governance) Indonesia does not have long-term forecasts for population and/or economic growth, and therefore we made use of long-term forecasts established in Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES), a report prepared by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for the Third Assessment Report (TAR) in 2001. SRES established scenarios for future population and economic growth, which resulted in emission scenarios to be used for driving global circulation models to develop climate change scenarios. Conclusions are:  Population growth and economic growth need only one future scenario  For climate change two options should be followed: one for the wet season, with higher rainfall and runoff, and one for the dry season, with lower rainfall and runoff.  For orientation of national politics, two options are identified: (1) focus on short-term economic development and (2) focus on long-term sustainability. The focus on short-term economic development is classified as the current trend (“business as usual”) and long-term sustainability is paraphrased as “Good Governance”. The assumptions for each parameter are summarized in Table 2.2 below. Table 2.2 Overview of scenarios for Pola and Rencana Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Population of Java

growth

Economic growth of Java

Orientation of the national politics/ Governance

Climate change

Scenario 3

Scenario 4

Starts at 1.1% per year and slowly declines to 0.5% per year in 2050, that is in between the A2 and B1 SRES scenarios Low Growth: Low Growth: Sustainable Growth: High Growth: 3% per year from 2013, similar to Stays well above 5% assuming a limited additional funds Scenario 1 per year continuous for water resources economic growth of development 7% per year. Current Trend Good Governance Assume that current Government & 6 Cis WRM institutes are able to implement Governance and/or good governance and are able to enforce all their plans and status quo will be are able to convince all stakeholders to implement the maintained provided plans. This mainly has impacts on adherence of conservation and spatial plans. 2030 2050 Average temperature change (degrees Celsius): 0.6 1.1 Average precipitation change (mm/day): 0.3 0.5 Sea level rise (m): 0.1 0.2

For the analysis in the Pola we have applied the scenario as developed for JSM 2.1 concerning rise of population and economic growth. For the Rencana we are applying the results of JSM 2.2, incorporating the recorded data from the 2010 population census. The DHV, Deltares, MLD

14



climate change scenario (based on analysis with Global Circulation Models) is limited to a change in average precipitation of 0.3 mm/day (2030) and 0.5 mm/day (2050). The estimate of the change in average precipitation is so uncertain, that it is not specified as an increase or a decrease. So for 2030 it might just as well be +0.3 mm/day as -0.3 mm/day.

2.3.4 Task B1-5 (continued) Formulation of the Rencana A. Formulation of the Rencana As indicated above the consultants will continue to assist BBWS in formulating the Rencana Induk, i.e. the Rencana for the whole 6 Cis area. This cannot be changed, becaude this is based on the Terms of Reference formulated in 2009, for 6 Cis RBT. However, the Public Consultation meetings will be held in all three new RBTs. The integration between the eventual three different Rencanas for each new RBT areas is required for Water Utilization, but separate plans will be presented for the other aspects. This is illustrated in Figure 2.3 below.

Figure 2.3 Impact of Changing 6 Cis to 3 River Basin Territory

B. Strategies Four different strategies have been proposed to the plenary meeting of TKPSDA of 6 Cis on March 6, 2012, as indicated below. TKPSDA selected strategy C (see yellow marked fields in table 2.3). Table 2.3 Overview of Strategies and application of scenarios and JSM simulations in Rencana Strategy Strategy A Strategy B Strategy C Strategy D Current Trend Pro-active Sustainable Maximum Compliance Management Management Management Keywords Strategy

Scenario used Sensitivity analysis JSM simulation used to develop a Strategy

Only minimum effort, including DMI-supply, with focus on water quantity Current Trend, Sustainable ec.growth (5%)

Like Strategy 1, plus strong institutions for integrated land and water management (but no extra budget) Good Governance Sustainable economic growth (5%)

Most likely scenario, optimal effort, aimed at improving all aspects of land and water management Good Governance Sustainable econ. growth (5%)

Low/High (3-7%) economic growth Current Trend for 3%, 5% and 7% economic growth

Low (3%) and High (7%) economic growth “Sustainable growth”: combinng Good Governance + water protection + food sustainability for three economic growth type

High (7%) economic growth Like JSM simulation for Strategy 2, but now for sustainable economic growth.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Maximum effort to meet maximum demand Good Governance High economic growth (7%) Sustainable (5%) economic growth Like JSM simulation for Strategy 2, but now for high economic growth

15



1a

CT

1b

CT

2

GG

3

GG

4

GG

Economic Growth

STRATEGY Climate Change

LOW

LOW

MEDIUM (5%)

HIGH

Identifier/Title

Explanation

A.Current Trend Compliance

Only minimum effort, incl DMIsupply, focus on water quantity Only used for sensitivity analysis Only used for sensitivity analysis

A. Current Trend Compliance B.Pro-active Management

LOW

Prepare for the worst

Governance

Approximately 1% iand decreasing

SCEN ARIO

ASSUMPTION Population Growth

B.Proactive Management C. Optimum Management D. Maximum Management

Like Strategy 1, plus strong institutions for IWRM (but no extra budget) for sensitivity analysis only Only used for sensitivity analysis Optimum effort, aimed at improving most aspects of land and water management. This is strategy selected by TKPSDA Maximum effort, aimed at improving all aspects of land and water management, assumming cost recovery. Only used for sensitivity analysis

Note: For practical reasons the base case will be with 5% economic growth (most likely scenario), with higher and lower growth tested in the sensitivity analysis

A. Short-term Compliance (Kepatuhan) Strategy: Objective of this strategy is to meet future water demands at lowest possible cost. This implies that other policy options will not be incorporated, such as the costly measures to promote long-term sustainability of the water resources system. This strategy will be necessary in case of the low growth scenario. This strategy includes the most urgently needed measures for conveyance of water from Jatiluhur to Jabodetabek, Karawang and Purwakarta, conveyance from the West and South side to cities in Banten and Jabodetabek, and includes some investments to raise DMI water supply to the Bandung region. No active groundwater management is envisaged, so subsidence will continue at the present alarming rates, but reliance on surface water in the Jakarta and Bandung areas will be limited during the period that groundwater still is available. Furthermore, this strategy implies low governmental efforts in improving efficiencies and from that respect precludes the implementation of non-structural measures which in the long run will be necessary to fully optimize the water supply potential of the 6 Cis RBT. Furthermore, this strategy assumes that no major investments are realized with respect to watershed conservation or restoration, and with respect to water quality improvement. Considered from a long-term perspective, this strategy is not desirable and mainly serves here as a comparison with the second strategy. B. Short-term Compliance plus Pro-Active Governance Strategy: This Strategy 2 is like Strategy 1, but in addition institutions are strengthened in such a way that land and water resources are managed in line with the existing laws and regulations. In this strategy it is assumed that no extra funds are made available for large-scale watershed restoration, and that no major investments take place related to water quality improvements. But the government does what it can to improve efficiencies. C. Sustainable Growth Strategy: This strategy implies meeting the water demands, based on an active groundwater management, and an active set of measures and policies aimed at pollution control and watershed conservation and restoration. This strategy will only be possible with sufficient financial resources, and a general drive for efficiency, fueled by a high economic development situation. The strategy implies that the authorities undertake strong actions to mitigate and eventually stop deep-groundwater abstraction in the coastal strip of Jakarta and in the Bandung Plain. After this transition, only groundwater abstraction by Public Water Supply and small private wells will be allowed. DHV, Deltares, MLD

16



This strategy includes the option to supply Jabodetabek from both the East and the West. For the upstream Saguling region, the set of measures is further complemented with components to satisfy the demands in this region. This strategy implies an active groundwater management, for which the surface water supply in the Jakarta and Bandung area will be increased quickly to provide an alternative to deep-groundwater supply, and consequently to allow a maximum sustainable groundwater exploitation. The strategy also assumes high governmental involvement in improving operation efficiencies. This means that great attention will be given to implementation of non-structural measures. Finally, this strategy contains measures which seems wise from a water resources development point of view, including raising Cirata dam with an additional 15 m and the development of the Rajamandala river-driven hydropower plant between Saguling and Cirata. D. High Growth Strategy: This strategy is like strategy 3, but with assumed higher economic growth at 7% per year until 2030. As demand will be higher, also more measures will be taken, and higher economic growth will enable the required extra funds. As such we will have four strategies (A. Short-term Compliance, B. Pro-active Governance, C. Sustainable growth and D. Maximum Growth) and two scenarios (1. Current Trend and 2. Good Governance), It makes no sense and it is a lot of work to develop each alternative for each scenario. Therefore we will analyze only the Strategy C with Good Governance scenario, while testing the others in sensitivity analysis.

C. Formulation of the Rencana – Conservation The strategy for conservation concentrates on 1. reducing erosion 2. enhancing water retention capacity 3. improving water quality and pollution control The first two items are addressed in the Technical Plan (RtRHL) from BPDAS (Ministry of Forerstry) as indicated already in 2.2.2 B The results have been translated to a combination of proposed measures based on a classification using the following aspects: 1. Ownership: Ministry of Forestry (Perhutani / Conservation agency) or other owners 2. Location: upstream – middle – downstream 3. Erosion senditivity and other aspects indicated in the classification of critical areas: very critical, critical, medium critical, potential critical and not critical (from BPDAS), For planning purpose priorities have to be defined, Based on the amount of work and cost identified for each cluster, aiming to distribute the efforts and budgets more evenly, and using this classification the priorities have been selected as follows: Upstream Middle Downstream Comment Priority 1 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 1 to be implemented in Very Critical 2013 – 2015, priority 2 in 2016Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Critical 2020 and priority 3 in 20121 -2030 Priority 2 Priority 3 Medium Critical Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Potential Critical Priority 2 Water quality has been addressed in a special study for the upper part of the Citarum basin. The water quality study aimed to assess the level of pollution, the origin of the pollution and the possible interventions. More specifically the following steps were implemented: 1. Assess the water quality at different locations over time in the Upper Citarum River; 2. Assess the source of pollution, differentiating (1) Domestic-Municipal sources, (2) Industrial sources and (3) agricultural sources; 3. Indentify types of interventions (wastewater treatment) as well a related costs

DHV, Deltares, MLD

17



4. Estimate the expected water quality and the result of certain interventions focusing on reduction of domestic-municipal and/or industrial wastewater treatment using RIBASIM; 5. Assess the benefits in terms of improved water quality, but also in economic terms 6. Present a road map on how the water quality in Citarum River can be improved. Actvities 1-4 and 6 have been completed. Activity 5 is still on-going, because this depends on the economist provided by WSP (World Bank). It is expected that the study can be completed in October 2012. D. Formulation of the Rencana – Water Utilization Estimation of Demand and Required Supply Water demand for irrigation in 2010 for the 6 Cis area is on average 213 m3/s, with a wide variation from 400 m3/s during land preparation in December to 30 m3/s in September, when most rice fields are dry. The average demand is decreasing, since irrigated land is converted to urban use. But the minimum requirement is not decreasing, because the water earlier used to irrigate converted land is transferred to still functional irrigated area, resulting in a higher cropping intensity (same crop for less hectare). Domestic, Municipal and Industrial (DMI) demand is constant at 123 m3/s for the whole area. But this demand is rapidly growing. The Pola used JSM 2.1 to forecast population and related demand for DMI. The Rencana uses the results of a newer version (JSM 2.2), which is based on the recorded data from the population census of 2010, as well as more accurate identification of urban status (related to unit water demand). Therefore JSM 2.2 predicts population growth and related urban growth and water demands more adequately. This leads to higher figures in the JABODETABEK area, but lower figures in most other areas. This is indicated in Table 2.4. However, the PDAMs do not have a distribution network which is capable to meet the total demand. The present coverage is less than 50%, but will be improved in 2030. However, the population also grows, and it is not realistic to assume that full coverage is reached in 2030. For 2050 a reduction in population growth is envisaged, and it should be possible to meet all requirements by that time. In the Rencana stage we will stick as much as possible to the development plans of the PDAMs, with a maximum based on the Pola and agreed with the TKPSDA. As a consequence not all demands are fully satisfied in 2030, and this is envisaged for 2050, as illustrated in Figure 2.4.

Figure 2.4 Development of supply by PDAM and water demand as envisaged in JSM 2.2

DHV, Deltares, MLD

18



Table 2.4 Overview of Demand and Required Supply Existing situation

Name Cluster

existing cluster capacity PDAM (2010)

JAKARTA

POLA 2010 Cluster Population 2010 (JSM2.1)

RENCANA 2030

Cluster demand 2030 (JSM2.1) (m3/s)

Cluster Population 2030 (JSM2.1)

19.4

8,932,524

38.5

10,797,861

BOGOR

3.8

5,525,312

14.1

7,509,452

DEPOK

0.0

1,522,084

4.1

BEKASI

5.0

4,276,454

BANDUNG

3.5

KARAWANG

2010 Cluster demand 2030 (JSM2.1) (m3/s)

Cluster Population 2010 (JSM2.2)

2030 Cluster Population 2030 (JSM2.2)

Case 1 2030 Cluster demand (2030) (JSM 2.2) (m3/s)

cluster PDAM coverage (2030) (m3/s)

9,585,835

13,198,973

54.2

41.6

18.8

5,722,264

7,798,285

22.4

16.4

2,128,101

5.7

1,738,572

2,296,798

8.1

5.7

11.1

5,921,976

15.0

4,965,270

7,454,963

24.1

15.5

7,419,931

18.6

9,201,493

22.5

7,437,778

9,186,122

26.4

15.3

5.5

4,601,452

10.0

6,052,764

13.3

4,445,474

5,915,351

10.5

6.8

TANGERANG

5.1

5,397,100

13.7

7,846,290

19.7

5,923,309

8,005,341

25.5

13.7

CILEGON/ SERANG 1)

4.3

2,347,943

5.7

3,340,776

8.0

2,309,690

3,679,422

11.0

8.0

LEBAK

0.2

962,774

2.0

1,236,584

2.6

952,150

1,120,669

1.9

0.9

OTHER 2)

0.8

2,528,427

5.7

3,044,062

6.7

2,488,151

2,854,916

8.2

5.0

47.7

43,514,001

123.5

57,079,361

153.9

5,568,493

61,510,839

192.2

Total Remarks:

existing supply is 40% of demand

41.6

Comments Coverage JakUt = 100% to allow replacing Deep Groundwater, Other kota can have coverage < 100% Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs Based on estimates from PDAMs

129.7

future supply is 70% of demand (following MDGs)

1) and 2) JSM estimates for Cilegon and Indramayu do not reflect the steel industry and oil industry. Therefore, specific industrial water requirement (assume 3 m3/s) is added 3) and 4) Karawang and Lebak do not have metropolitan areas, therefore demand is less comparing JSM 2.1 and JSM 2.2

DHV, Deltares, MLD

19



Indication of options for supply The analysis of supply options mainly concentrates on the options to meet the rapidly growing DMI in the critical period. The supply to irrigation is constant, and adequate, although local shortages occur, but this mostly due to deficiencies in infrastructure to convey the water, not in Water Resources. As an example, shortages are reported for West Pamarayan scheme, but this occurs even when there is sufficient water in the Ciujung river. Therefore the problem is not the water resources, but the capacity of the main canal. As such the measure needed is desiltation and rehabilitation of the main canal, which is covered under the options for irrigation scheme rehabilitation. The potential options for increased supply of DMI are analyzed per urban conglomeration cluster, as already indicated in Figures 2.1 and 2.2. First, potential options to meet the Figure 2.5 Overview to Supply Tangerang Cluster demands for that cluster are identified. If more than sufficient options are Tangerang available, a prioritization Need: 19.7 m3/s (Pola) BKT based on cost is applied. 5 Current supply from Cisadane: 5.1 m3/s DI DI Cisadane Cisadane (22.089 (22.089 ha) ha)

Cengkareng Drain: 1 Banjir Kanal Barat: 2

Envisaged supply (PDAM 2030): 13.7 m3/s 3

0.5

1.4

Envisaged increase:

13.7 – 5.1 = 8.6 m3/s

Pondok Benda

Options: 1.Karian + KSCS (+5.9m3/s): and 2. Pasirkopo (+ 3.3 m3/s) and 3. Cilawang (+4.1 m3/s), or 4.Tanjung (+9.7 m3/s)

Tanjung

Unregulated: Cisadane

Price in Rp/m3 Strategy Rp 1340/m3 C Rp 1726/m3 C Rp 1836/m3 D Rp 4489/m3 D

Cilawang

Conclusion: sufficient supply in Strategy C. Figure 2.6 Overview to Supply Depok and Bogor Cluster

Depok / Bogor

Depok

Need: 24.5 m3/s (Pola), Current supply:

0.5

5 .8

5.2 8

Limo

Can all 2 2

Jatiluhur

‐Empang

Salak countour Genteng

Price in Rp/m3

1. Salak Contour (+2m3/s);

Narogong Unregulated:

Cirata

Strategy

Rp 540/m3

C

2. Empang/Katulampa (+4 m3/s); Rp 526/m3

C

3. Genteng (+2.5m3/s)

Rp 2900/m3

C

4. Naragong (+1 m3/s)

Rp 3000/m3

C

Saguling

Bogor

22 m3/s

Envisaged extra supply: 22 – 3.8 = 18.2 m3/s Options:

Unregulated: ‐Citereup

2.5 ‐Katulampa

Envisaged supply (PDAM 2030):

188

Unregulated: Cisadane

3.8 m3/s

Not enough: 2 + 4 + 2.5 + 1 = 9.5 < 18.2 m3/s.

As an example we show the analysis for Tangerang, figure 2.5 and for Bogor and Depok as presented in figure 2.6. For Tangerang the options for supply in Strategy C are adequate. But for Bogor and Depok the supply options mentioned in Strategy C are not adequate, and we need extra measures. For this we selected Canal 2, which is even cheaper than the options Genteng and Naragong in Strategy C, and the latter two could be replaced by Canal 2.

Therefore also needed: 5. Canal 2 (+13.2 m3/s),

Rp 2271/m3

D

Various aspects of water utilization: a. Administrative conditions for water resources utilization (Penatagunaan SDA): this mainly concerns official regulations covering water management b. Availability of Water Resources (Penyediaan SDA): this mainly concerns the different options to meet demand as explained above. c. Identification of more efficient water utilization (Pengunaan SDA): Under this heading options to improve efficiency of irrigation are evaluated, as well as options to decrease unaccounted for water in urban water supply. d. Water Resources Development (Pembangunan SDA): covers hydropower development of new types of water supply (ultra filtration etc.) e. Corporatization (Pengusahaan SDA): private sector involvement in development of urban water supply and mini-micro hydropower.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

20



E. Formulation of the Rencana - Disaster Management Flood Management is addressed by physical and non-physical measures. Zoning is a nonphysical measure related to spatial planning, to reduce rapid run-off during heavy rainstorms and erosion in the upper catchment, and reduce vulnerability for damages in the areas affected by floods through mandatory preparations. Early warning and reduction of solid waste disposal in urban canals are other examples of non-physical measures. These measures are generic for all areas. The physical plans show much variation, depending on the level of protection feasible for each specific area. Such feasibility studies do not exist yet for the 6 Cis area, but, based on international experience, the study for the Upper Citarum Flood Management Project (TA 7189 Package C) and discussions in the Public Consultation Meetings, it is assumed that metropolitan areas require a protection level of 1 in 100 year, other urban areas 1: 25 years, and rural areas 1 in 5 years. As such plans have been developed for the clusters around Serang, JABODETABEK, upper Citarum and lower Citarum. This mainly concerns dredging of the existing flood ways, improving existing embankments, as well as creating temporary storage where possible. For JABODETABEK also consideration is given for protection against flooding from the sea. Other measures concern assistance during floods and droughts, as well as measures to reduce landslides and provide protection against flooding from the sea. For Jakarta use is made of the Jakarta Coastal Defence strategy, which is not only improving protection, but also addressing land reclamation, traffic, water supply and environmental health. F. Data Management, Public Participation and Spatial Planning These aspects are addressed in generic way, because the measures are similar in all RBT. Cost estimates are mainly based on number of events, and where applicable based on size of population and extent of operation area.

2.3.5 Task B.1-6 State of The Basin Reporting A preliminary proposal for benchmarking indicators is presented in Annex F. The methodology has been discussed with BBWS Citarum in May, which will result in a final report on methodology, which is expected as part of the final report in October. The actual assessment is not anymore envisaged within the framework of 6 Cis, because the required budget of approximately 250 M Rp has not been allocated by BBWS Citarum.

2.4.

Issues

2.4.1 Issues concerning Sub-component B.1A A. 6 Cis RBT By decree of the President (KEPPRES 12/2012) the original 6Ci RBT has been split in three new RBT, based on the working areas of the three River Basin Organizations (BBWS) established in the area. This may have impacts on Pola and Rencana (reported in 2.4.2), as well as for functioning of the TKPSDA. B. TKPSDA In August the TKPSDA for 6 Cis had its last session. It has been functioning well, with adequate support from the secretariat in the BBWS. However, after the split in 6Cis RBT, three new TKPSDA have to be established in each new RBT. This will take time, and a lot of effort for which the consultant cannot provide assistance anymore. Moreover, it will not be ready before the work of the consultants is completed.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

21



After the split of 6 Cis, coordination of the three TKPSDAs needs special arrangements. The weakness is that there is no coordinating platform for the issues beyond one RBT, such as water supply to Jakarta and efforts in upstream Citarum (management of watershed protection and water quality) for the benefit of the people living in Jakarta. It is advised that the already established TKPSDA will remain in place for strategic, inter-basin affairs, with sub-commissions dealing with issues at the individual new RBT C. Provincial Water Councils. The Banten Water Council has been established already in 2006, but has been restructured several times, changing the way representatives are selected. The effectiveness of the Banten Water Council is limited, compared to the other two provinces. The Banten Water Council has engaged consultants to formulate a strategic water resources management plan, which has been completed in December. It is not yet clear how this plan synchronizes with the Pola for 6 Cis. D. CMTs and CDAPs implementation. Change Management Teams (CMTs) and Capacity Development Action Plans (CDAPs) have not been established. CDAPs depend on distribution of tasks, which is not yet clearly defined. Pending these decisions, capacity development analysis cannot be implemented, and curriculum development cannot be started. It is not possible anymore to develop these in the time remaining. The resources have been used to assist in establishing the TKPSDA and Dewan SDA, familiarizing the members with their job and start functioning, as well as raining of the counterparts. E. Counterparts The counterparts from DGSP and DGWR are all junior staff, but with good education (bachelor and master degrees) and high motivation. However, they have only limited time for participating in the 6 Cis project, because DGSP, DGWR and especially the BBWS have limited personnel. Although the more intensive on-the-job training started with three rounds along all BBWS in January - March, it was already clear that in the months after that time would be limited again. Activities continued in April – June, but stopped after that. This will seriously hamper the transfer of knowledge concerning formulation of the Rencana. F. Budgets For 2012 adequate budgets are available at the BBWS to support TKPSDA and the Rencana preparations, but not for state of the basin benchmarking. They are as follows: Table 2.5 Overview of 2012 budgets available in the BBWS for 6 Cis (in M Rp)

TKPSDA POLA/Rencana State of Basin benchmarking TOTAL

BBWS 3 Cis 600 350

BBWS Cil/Cis 1200 500

950

1700

BBWS Citarum 500 700 2501 1450

This budget includes the cost for a central secretariat with three permanent staff members at BBWS CilCis for the whole TKPSDA, and a decentralized secretariat at the other two BBWS. Furthermore, the head of O&M in the three BBWS is responsible to assist the TKPSDA in proper functioning, such as convening meetings, setting the agenda, minutes of meetings, follow up of meetings etc., This implies that the BBWS, while assisting the TKPSDA, takes a major role in coordination of all WRM activities in the RBT. Strong commitment from the head of BBWS for this support is essential. Budget of 175 M Rp, is also available in sub-directorate Perencanaan WS to support this activity. 1

Not yet allocated

DHV, Deltares, MLD

22



2.4.2 Issues concerning Sub-component B.1B A. Decision Support System and Water Availability (Task 1-3 and 1-4). Water availability has to be checked based on adjusted rainfall data records, but reliability of the data is not adequate, as mentioned in section 2.3.2. The data collected and the models prepared should be available on a web-based meta data base. It was intended to have this done through the system at the Ministry of Public Works, but this proved to be too difficult. Therefore it will be tried through the web-ste of RCMU (Cita Citarum). Another issue is the requirements for environmental flows based on PP 38/2011 on rivers. In the Rencana the requirements for this have been included with a low priority, that means only when other needs have been met. However, the PP 38/2011 requires first priority. This is not according to current practice and it will be very difficult to explain to farmers that they may not make use of the available water during critical times, because the water has to be available for unclear environmental aspects. This needs additional discussion with the directorate of rivers. B. Pola and Rencana (Task 1-5). Issues concerning this aspect are related to i. Split in RBT 6 Cis and completion of Pola ii. Completion of draft Rencana according to the expanded scope iii. New guidelines for preparation of Basin Master Plans Ad i) Split in RBT 6 Cis: the consultants have completed their obligation to finalize the Pola for 6 Cis, and are about to complete the Rencana for 6 Cis. However, now three new Polas and three Rencanas have to be prepared, one for each new RBT. Formulating three new Polas is relatively simple, because the change has been anticipated, Public Consultation Meetings have been held in all three areas and do not have to be repeated and the basic material is already complete. Still the wording has to be changed, also affecting structure and contents of tables, figures and maps, and some part of the modeling has to be adapted to provide accurate figures at the inter-connections. It is anticipated that this can be done by the present team for 6 Cis, requiring three extra months for the WR planners, and some extra input from the international WR planner and modeler. Completion of the draft Rencana will be in three volumes, as required for the new situation. The extra work will be covered under the present contract. Ad (ii): completion of Rencana according to expanded scope met several problems: a. Variation Order 4 (VO4) had not yet been approved, but the activities had to be started in time to be ready in July. The expanded scope was basically agreed already in February 2012, and the reflection in the consultancy contract through VO4 was in principle approved during negotiations in April 2012, although not yet officially endorsed by ADB. In order not to loose time, implementation started in January for already approved staff, and in May 2012 for the other activities. On September 7 the VO 4 was officially approved, and only some minor issues have to be settled. b. Public Consultation Meetings (PCM) planned for June 2012, could not be implemented. Therefore the proposals for selection and prioritization of measures as prepared by the consultants, and partly discussed with BBWS, have not been presented to the stakeholders as required by the guidelines. By postponing this to September extra time will be required for the consultants. If the PCMs are not held in September 2012, the extra required time cannot be covered anymore by the existing contract.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

23



The present Pola, as approved by the TKPSDA in December 2011, has been completed for the whole 6 Cis RBT. In this way the Pola for 6 Cis may function as an umbrella for integrated approach of the larger system, especially concerning the inter-basin transfers from the eastern and western side to Ciliwung-Cisadane and the Jakarta area. Some people refer to this as the Pola Induk. But since the new Perpres has been issued before the POLA was legalized, the legal status of this is just a reference. DGWR will issue a circulating letter covering the present Pola as the “Pola Induk”. The legal status of the Rencana for 6 Cis is now also unclear. Some people say that this will be the Rencana Induk, and separate Rencana are needed for each of the new RBTs. In the mean time the consultants are working according to their Terms of Reference, which only considers the Rencana for 6 Cis. However, the Public Consultation Meetings are held for all three RBTs separately to anticipate smooth approval of Rencana per new RBT. And the Rencana is prepared in three volumes, one for each new RBT, however, the chapter on water utilization is almost the same for each RBT, because of the integrated management required. Ad iii) New guidelines for Basin Water Resources Master Plans. New guidelines for Master Plan preparation, are currently developed and applied within DGWR. However, since this guideline did not exist when the TOR for 6 Cis was prepared, compliance is not ensured. For instance, the Master Plan guidelines require borehole investigations for potential major reservoir sites. We have prepared a gap analysis showing the differences between the requirements in the draft guidelines, and how much we can comply with the requirements stated in this new guideline, given the original ToR for 6 Cis Package B and the remaining time. This is presented in Annex J. C. Hydrological database The reliability of the additional data set on rainfall is doubted. As reported above the hydrological data base available from BTA 155, with rainfall data from 1950 – ‘79, has been extended with additional time series 1980 – 2009 from 176 stations. However, reliability of these data is doubted, since they show some discrepancies that cannot be explained based on presently assumed phenomena such as climate change or land use change. Therefore, this additional data base has not been applied for the analysis. Some information is presented in Annex D, while it will be more extensively reported in the Final report. D. Training Several training sessions have been organized to familiarize the counterparts with the issues in the whole 6 Cis River Basin Territory (RBT), the methodology applied by the consultants to assess the present conditions, issues and potential measures to address these issues, as well as the tools developed by the consultants. As such we have familiarized them with the situation in the Ciliwung, Cisadane and Citarum basins during field trips to these areas and discussing the methodology for assessment. We have also started training in application of HYMOS/FEWS and Ribasim in a number of sessions, not only with the counterparts, but also with participants from other relevant directorates and PusAir. This training follows the gradual development of the water balance model. The following training sessions have been held and are envisaged: 1. Introduction in modeling and applying HYMOS/FEWS (May / June 2010) 2. Introduction in modeling and applying Ribasim (October 2010) 3. Schematization of the RBT for the water balance model (March 2011) 4. Assessment of demands from agriculture and urban water supply (DMI) (June 2011) 5. Review HYMOS and FEWS (October 2011) 6. Application of the Pola concepts / Review book of Pola 6 Cis (October 2011). 7. Assess water demand (February 2012)

DHV, Deltares, MLD

24



8. Rencana formulation and application of 6 Cis water balance model simulating specific measures (June 2012) 9. Deltanetter (mapping and GIS applications) (June 2012) 10. Full application of the 6 Cis water balance model (Planned for September 2012). The counterparts also could participate in the training for B.2: 1. JSM 2.1 (November 2010) 2. Zonation and JSM 2.2 (June-August 2011) 3. Erosion and Peak flow estimation (June 2012) Each counterpart received a laptop with HYMOS and Ribasim established, to familiarize themselves with the tools. Data included in the models are mainly based on all information available from earlier projects as well as gathered in the present project on rainfall and runoff using additional hydrological data, (present and future) land use, (using JSM see chapter 3), and updating the information on additional infrastructure (river structures, canals, pipelines, dams etc.). It is important that the counterparts not only familiarize themselves with the work done by the consultants, but also get more skill in applying the methodology and the tools on their own. They will not get this skill when they are only involved in certain training events, but they have to get more experience while applying this during on-the-job training. Therefore the counterparts should be more full-time available, as agreed during negotiations with the ADB at the start of the project. More intensive training on-the job, as part of the scope for the extension, could only be implemented from January – June 2012, and was then stopped, because the counterparts were too busy with other activities. A training report has been prepared with assessment of the past trainings and recommendation for future improvements by the training specialist. This is in Annex B

2.5.

Developments envisaged before the end of the project

In the coming period we expect that the MoU concerning on distribution of tasks between PJT II, BBWS and Provincial PSDA will be finalized and signed. The last training concerning overall application of Ribasim will be held in September In the meantime we will complete preparation of the Rencana, based on the conclusions of the draft Pola, and results from the Public Consultation Meetings hopefully held in September 2012. During preparation of the rencana more attention has been given to cost estimates and ranking of measures based on assessed benefits. Impacts of measures are assessed in simulations using the developed analytical framework and decision support tools. The draft final report is envisaged to be completed end of October, to be presented on a workshop in early November, and completed by the end of November.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

25


DHV, Deltares, MLD


26


3.

SUB COMPONENT B.2

3.1.

Status of B2 tasks


The status of activities per 31 August 2012 and the expected status at the end of the project in December 2012 is presented in table 3.1 on next page. Work on Package B2 was finished in August 2011 and a draft report was distributed in October 2011. Since no comments were received, the final version of the final report for B2 was distributed in May 2012. In this report period an extension of the B2 project was approved in April 2012 and mostly carried out from May – July 2012. The extension for B2 includes three activities as follows: A. Support the TA Rencana WRM process with spatial planning input B. Support integration of water zoning in the spatial planning process C. Intensive transfer of knowledge for water zoning tools The extension of subcomponent B2 was coordinated closely with the development of the content of the Rencana of the 6Ci’s RBT in subcomponent B1. Subcomponent B1 planned to finish the development of the draft content of the Rencana in June 2012. Hence the extension work for B2 started in April 2012 and was finished in June 2012, except for activity A which continues the Rencana support up to September. The remainder of this section describes the objectives and findings of the extension work.

3.2.

Developments, Outputs and Issues

3.2.1 Developments A - Support TA Recana WRM Process with Spatial Planning Input Spatial planning input from the B2 Indonesian staff for the POLA has been proven essential, especially in guiding the process of acceptation of the POLA. Spatial planning input from the Indonesian staff for the Rencana phase is required for: 1. Providing up-to-date information on spatial planning aspects 2. Help organise the external Rencana plan dissemination and acceptation process 3. Updating the Java spatial plan GIS with new legalized kabupaten/kota spatial plans Activity A covers the PU DGSP request for continued participation of key B2 spatial planning staff in the process of developing the basin water resources management plans (RENCANA) for the three water authorities (Balai Besar) in the 6Ci. It has been shown that it is valuable to include the spatial planners in the team that guides the external plan process. This task also includes the updating of the Java spatial plan GIS with the recently legalized district (kabupaten / kota) plans. This is mainly implemented by the Indonesian team for B.2. The international team leader provided backstopping and reporting. B - Support Integration of Water Resources and Spatial Planning The objective of this activity is to support the establishment of an accepted process for setting up water zoning by: 1. addressing the water resources issues in the Rencana phase of the 6Ci’s project, 2. discussion on the criteria for zoning, 3. establishing the methodology and data base requirements to incorporate water zoning into detailed Kabupaten/Kota spatial plans, and 4. formulation of advice on the institutional set-up (distribution of roles, process of cooperation and exchange of information) and capacity building to carry out and further develop water zoning in the future. DHV, Deltares, MLD

27



Table 3.1 Status B2 Design and Monitoring Framework (31 August 2012) (Original scope of work) Design summary Regional spatial plan existing local plans.

reflecting

Up-to-date land-use map sensing) for the project area.

the

Performance targets / indicators Existing spatial plans collected, interpreted and homogenized as JSM input (2011)

(remote

Land use map completed and made available to relevant agencies

Java Spatial Model (JSM) for projection of population and land-use

Model developed, calibrated and validated, with user documentation and training Report on estimates of spatial requirements completed and submitted (2010)

Estimates of spatial requirements for water sector and other related sectors (housing, industry, agriculture, and environment). Spatial strategies and scenarios: interpretation of projections, resolution of conflicts on the use of space. Quantification of impact of water related zoning on land-use in the basin (low-flow and peak flow conservation zoning, flood zoning, erosion zoning, groundwater protection zoning, and so on), based on the water resources analysis for the river basin. Strategic assessment of the impacts of water related zoning on other sectors.

2

Page 1 of 2

Status 31 August 2012

Possible status end of project December20122

Higher level spatial plans collected and interpreted. For RTRW kabupaten/kota data collection is finalized. Available spatial plans have been homogenized into JSM input for JSM 2.2 in summer 2011

Further collection of remaining RTRW (still some 10 districts remaining) and assistance in strating up the process for detailed spatial planning (RDTR), Only after additional funds become available (assumed in March 2012) this will be intensified. No further development since this component has been finalized.

Remote sensing data interpretation available from Applied Geo Solutions, contracted under 6 Cis project, based on JAXA / ALOS imagery using PALSAR radar signals (not disturbed by clouds). A Java 2010 land use map has been prepared as input of JSM 2.2 based on Bakosurtanal map of 2005-2007; ALOS for 6Ci and Java, BPS agricultural area statistics for 2009. JSM 2.2 development completed based on up-to-date desa 2010 land use and population data. Data collection finalised, requirements used as inputs for JSM in version 2.2. Draft Final report ready in September 2011 (Rencana phase)

No further development since this component has been finalized. To be updated based on final land use data from final RTRW in April-June 2012 . Draft Final report submitted in October 2011. Final report submitted in June 2012.To be updated based on final RTRW in April-June 2012.

Report on spatial strategies and scenarios completed and submitted (2010)

Included in JSM 2.2 datasets. Draft Final report ready 1st week in September 2011 (Rencana phase)

Draft Final report submitted in October 2011. Final report submitted in June 2012. To be updated based on final RTRW in April-June 2012

Report on quantification of impact of water related zoning on land-use in the basin completed and submitted (2010)


Draft Final report submitted in October 2011. Final report submitted in June 2012. To be updated based on final RTRW in April-June 2012

Report on strategic assessment of the impacts of water related zoning on other sectors completed and submitted (2011)


Draft Final report submitted in October 2011. Final report submitted in June 2012.. To be updated based on final RTRW in April-June 2012

Based on agreed workplan in Variation Order 4.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

28



Table 3.2 Status B2 Design and Monitoring Framework (31 August 2012) (Extended scope of work) Design summary (Extension)

Performance targets / indicators

A. Support the RENCANA water resources management process with spatial planning input

Spatial planning principles are incorporated into the RENCANA for retention areas and water supply

B. Support integration of water resources zoning aspects in the spatial planning process at regional level

Detailed water zoning recommendations and integrated into district spatial plans

C. Intensive transfer of knowledge and capacity building for water zoning tools and JSM to district and province agencies

Tools and models implemented and used by all relevant agencies and their staff

3

Page 2 of 2

Status 31 August 2012

Possible status end of project December20123

The spatial planning principles are incorporated in the Rencana, but also the current spatial plans (RTRW) have been checked on incorporation of water related issues. It was noted that for existing infrastructure (reservoirs, canals and rivers) spatial provisions were indicated. It was also noted that provisions were incorporated to protect irrigated area, in line with Law 41/2009 for protection of highly productive areas for food production. The water resources issues in the Rencana phase of the 6Ci’s project have been addressed and incorporated in draft guidelines for zoning. The criteria for zoning have been discussed during site vists and in two workshops. After this the methodology and data base requirements to incorporate water zoning into detailed Kabupaten/Kota spatial plans have been established and advice was formulated on the institutional setup (distribution of roles, process of cooperation and exchange of information) and capacity building to carry out and further develop water zoning in the future. Two workshops have been organized to support the establishment of water zoning principles as part of spatial plan preparation. Training has been prepared and executed focused on the planning of water zoning and generation of information for such planning using models and data bases. Specifically the theory behind the USLE model and behind the peak flow tool for water zoning has been targeted. Specific trainings have been given on how to operate the erosion USLE tool, how to operate the peak flow tool and how to derive water zoning using these tools. The final training has been on how to incorporate the water zoning developed in an analysis of how the new zoning affects the projected settlement and land use changes in JSM 2.2.

The co-team Leader and spatial planner will provide support to the B.1 team to present the Rencana to the coordinating teams for spatial planning, who are now preparing the detailed district spatial plans (RDTR) with maps at scale 1:5000.

This work has been completed. The results presented in (i) Updated Java Spatial Plan (harmonization of available kabupaten spatial plans) (ii) Minor update of the Java Spatial Model with the updated harmonized spatial plan and 2010 CBS economic data by kabupaten. (iii) Bundled training materials and manuals for the water zoning tools (iv) Final report, including institutional aspects Evaluation whether the performance criteria have been taken up in the RDTR cannot be done under the present contract for TA 7189, because the plans will be finalized one year later. This work has been completed. Training materials have been bundled, including manuals for the tools. Evaluation whether the performance criteria have been taken up in the RDTR cannot be done under the present contract for TA 7189, because there are insufficient resources for regular visits to all districts. .

Based on agreed workplan in Variation Order 4.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

29



For Activity B two workshops have been organized to support the establishment of water zoning principles as part of spatial plan preparation. C - Intensive Transfer of Knowledge for Water Zoning Tools Objective of this task is to transfer knowledge on the models and data bases by:  identifying/elaborating the role of zoning in water resources planning leading to specification of the information needed by planners,  providing background information on the modeling, and  carrying out hands-on case studies;  explain how to implement and analyse water zoning with the Java Spatial Model Activity C consisted of the following training activities: 1. Started with the preparation and then execution of a training focused on the transfer of knowledge on the planning of water zoning and the generation of information for such planning using models and data bases. Specifically the theory behind the USLE model and behind the peak flow tool for water zoning is targeted. 2. A training on how to operate the erosion USLE tool and how to derive water zoning. 3. A training on how to operate the peak flow tool and how to derive water zoning. 4. The final training is on how to incorporate the water zoning developed in an analysis of how the new zoning affects the projected settlement and land use changes in JSM 2.2.

3.2.2 Outputs of the extension of sub-component B2 In line with the objectives, the activities of the extension of the subcomponent B2 project have generated the following outputs (until approved these are in draft): (i) Updated Java Spatial Plan (based on harmonization of available kabupaten spatial plans) (ii) Minor update of the Java Spatial Model with the updated harmonized spatial plan and 2010 CBS economic data by kabupaten. (iii) Bundled training materials and manuals for the water zoning tools (iv) The Extension Report for subcomponent B2, including a description of the legal framework, water resources issues; - the criteria for water zoning, - the methodology/data base requirements for introducing water zoning in Kabupaten plans, and - advise on the institutional set-up and capacity building, needed to implement water zoning principles in spatial planning.

3.2.3 Issues 1. As mentioned in the earlier quarterly reports the census 2010 population data has not yet been completed. Data at kecamatan level have been delivered. The desa level data, however, were not available up to now. Therefore in JSM 2.2 the kecamatan data have been used to estimate desa level population, households and employment based on 2010 land use data. This is the dataset that used in producing the B2 report. 2. PU requested an extension of B2 to enhance institutionalization of the results of B2. ADB has reached agreement that extra funds will be available starting May 2012 and extra activities will be incorporated in Variation Order 4, which was approved on September 7, 2012. This late approval had no impact on delivery of results. 3. Mr. Raymond Kemur was envisaged under the extension to take care of follow up visits to the districts, to assist them in incorporating the water resources needs in the detailed spatial plans (RDTR), and assess how they are doing that. However, Mr. Kemur took up another assignment with ADB, and could do this task only during the trainings in May, (in stead of the envisaged 4.5 months). As a result we cannot assist the districts to incorporate the water needs more than we did in the trainings and some visits in May – July 2012. However, the assessment whether they take up water resources needs in RDTR is done by the co-team leader of B.2 as part of his evaluation function in DGSP. DHV, Deltares, MLD

30



3.3.

Key Findings

Conclusions and recommendations on the legal framework, the water zoning and the organizational aspects are included in the draft final report of the B2 extension. This report is in the process of being distributed in September. Hence the conclusions and recommendations have been added to this report to allow early discussion.

3.3.1 Conclusions and recommendations on the legal framework The spirit of the water law no. 7/2004 and the spatial planning law no. 26/2007 is already inline, supporting both spatial planning as well as water resources management in a fair, efficient and sustainable manner. Harmonizing its implementations can be achieved by understanding the nature characteristics of water resources as flowing dynamic resources that cross the administrative boundary, multi discipline, multi user, multi-stakeholders; coordination among the river basin organization and related agencies; recognizing upstream and downstream cooperation; studying the lessons learned in the past; research and development to produce new approach and tools, and full support from the whole layers of the stakeholders: public, private, and the government. However it must be concluded that 1) currently the supporting regulations that should cover the links between water and space are not yet legalized and 2) guidelines on how to integrate water resources planning and spatial planning are not yet available. Figure 3.1 Missing guidelines in the integration of WR planning and spatial planning

Water Law

 Legalized

Regulation MISSING 

Guideline

Guideline

Draft 

 Draft ….

 MISSING

Regulation Legalized 

Spatial Law

There is a clear need to integrate the water resources and the spatial planning. The links can be defined in relation to spatial law 26/2007 protection areas as follows in the three tables below. The tables describe the zoning area description of the spatial planning law 26/2007; the water resources aspects to be included and the method as used in for illustration in the sub-component B2 work in the 6Ci. The aspects as mentioned above should be included in the guidelines which need to be developed to achieve an integration of water resources and spatial planning. They can also form the basis of the contents of a water assessment approach.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

31



Table 3.3 Integration of WR aspects in protected area (kawasan lindung) Zoning in the New Spatial Plan (UU 26/2007) with water resources input: 1 Kawasan lindung Specific Zone Kws Lindung (conservation area, includes protected forest)

Kawasan Perlindungan bagi Kawasan Bawahannya (Protection zone for protecting the downstream part)

Area description

‐‐> WR addition 1

Water Resources Addition

Zoning code specification

‐

Conservation area according to legalized spatial plans

Reforestation required if currently no forest; Where possible (in particular on state owned lands) re‐ Delineation based on the USLE model. In On non‐forested areas with forestation, this includes re‐forestation of the terms of additional area to be protected slope>30%: Reforestation for recently deforested areas in current conservation areas; for areas not owned by the state agro‐forestry on top of harmonised spatial plan. erosion control should be promoted: tree crops such as coffee and other fruit trees. No urbanization allowed.

Protection of dry‐land ‐‐> WR addition 2 (Kebun agriculture area that is Lindung) vulnerable for erosion with slope >15%

‐‐> WR addition 3 ΔQ=0 policy area

Method & remarks The map of conservation areas is the basis for adding extra protection based on WR inputs, it is based on all legalized spatial plans of Java.

Prevent peak flow increases

Improve agricultural management practice and add extra infiltration and retention. No other (urban) developments allowed The ΔQ=0 policy needs to be implemented for new urban areas and upgrading of existing urban areas. Forbid further urbanization unless there is application of urban building codes which specify sufficient compensating measures (retention, infiltration).

Delineation based on the USLE model. In terms of additional area to be protected on top of harmonised spatial plan.

Peak flow contributing zones can be delineated with the Peak Flow model or similar instruments. Applied for Katu Lampa, Serpong, Pamarayan.

Protection of current bush/scrub areas (usually state Delineation based on the USLE model. In owned) against possible further degrading; Protection of bush/scrub upgrading of those areas to (production) forest in the terms of additional area to be protected ‐‐> WR addition 4 areas (often degraded forest) on top of harmonised spatial plan. Not future; they are not a priority for rehabilitation with slope > 15% because they are not a serious problem for erosion applied in this analysis and runoff. No urbanization allowed. Natural depression/retention areas need to Identify potential retention areas using a ‐‐> WR addition 5 Limit development in preserved; this allows creation of extra retention detailed DEM in a GIS. Not applied in this Preserve retention areas potential retention areas (situ‐situ) (this is the zone where retention has a analysis. maximum effect)

Table 3.4 Local buffer zone (kawasan perlindungan setempat) Zoning in the New Spatial Plan (UU 26/2007) with water resources input: 1 Kawasan Perlindungan Setempat

Kawasan Perlindungan Setempat (Locally protected zone)

Area description

Specific Zone

Zoning code specification For unprotected coastal areas sensitive to sea level rise the development of new urban areas should be restricted to prevent future damages. Within the river border the development of new (b) Sempadan Sungai Prevent development within urban areas should be restricted to prevent future (river border) the river borders damages. Protection of catchment areas Further settlement should be prevented unless in of water resources areas with a slope <15 % and with strict (c) Sempadan Waduk dan infrastructure. Includes implementation of the ΔQ=0 policy. For emission Situ (reservoir and lake reservoirs, lakes, situ situ, protection of drinking water intakes any new urban border) water resources intakes etc. development must limit the emission by using local Include future infrastructure waste water treatment plants. too! (a) Sempadan Pantai (coastal border)

(d) Sempadan Mata Air (spring border)

Water Resources Addition Limit development in sensitive areas for sea level rise

Protect water springs

The area surrounding a water spring should be protected to prevent degradation of the spring.

Method & remarks Based on SLR estimates delineate the vulnerable area using a detailed DEM. Not applied in this analysis No further urbanization is allowed in the river flood plain. Not applied in this analysis. Delineation based on DEM for: ‐ Reservoir catchment areas ‐ Drinking water intake catchment area ‐ Situ situ catchment area (not applied)

Based on spring location determine the vulnerable area. Not applied in this analysis.

Table 3.5 Flood disaster zone (kawasan rawan banjir) Zoning in the New Spatial Plan (UU 26/2007) with water resources input: 1 Kawasan Rawan Banjir

Kawasan Rawan banjir (Flood disaster zone)

Area description

Specific Zone

Water Resources Addition Flood plain zoning needs to be part of an integrated (a) Flood plain protection approach to flood control management. (b) Downstream area of reservoirs and situ‐situ

The area sensitive to flood surge caused by dam break must be protected

Zoning code specification

Method & remarks

For flood plain areas sensitive to frequennt flooding Based on flood reports the prone areas the development of new urban areas should be were delineated. restricted to prevent future damages. Area downstream of dams should have room for Delineation can be based on analysis of flood surge without damaging urban areas to prevent flood surge caused by a dam break using loss of life and major damages. In other words a zone Sobek and a DEM. Not applied in this must be delineated where no urbanization is analysis. allowed.

3.3.2 Conclusions and recommendations for water zoning The many discussions on water zoning and the development and application of quantitative tools for zoning lead to the following set of observations/recommendations. 1. Implementation of water zoning in Kabupaten plans: Implementation of water zoning in Kabupaten plans forms a crucial step in implementation of spatial management. Considerable interest has been expressed by local authorities to follow through the approaches which have been outlined for the Upper Citarum and Ciliwung case. Documentation of such cases would provide urgently needed examples, very useful in guidelines. Establishing the cases would comprise assistance to the K. Bogor DHV, Deltares, MLD

32



and Upper Citarum regional authorities to work out the detailed local plan with incorporation of water zoning. For the Ciliwung this would include assistance to compose an adapted spatial plan with delineations and associated regulation. For the Upper Citarum this would further involve assistance in setting up the rehabilitation program and required cooperation. 2. Review of conservation requirements and preparation of a proposed spatial management: The conservation areas in the current Java/Bali plan originate mostly from an earlier intended conservation of forests. Those conservation zones (apart from the national parks) are outdated and do not represent the current need for conservation zoning. Most of those areas are no longer forests ; quite often land-use has become dry-land agriculture and are in erosion sensitive areas; an adapted conservation concept is required. In view of the increasing scarcity of land other interests have emerged such as flood management which has become a major concern and needs to be incorporated in spatial plans. Other interests are ecological concerns (a minimum undisturbed area to maintain flora and fauna). Etc. Based on an updated set of conservation requirements and their quantitative representation an illustrative proposal should be made for an appropriate zoning in the spatial plan. This can form the basis for a wider discussion and finally a decision on the desired approach. 3. Further development/dissemination of methodology: Some methodologies and applications have been prepared/illustrated in the 6Ci’sB2+extention component. Presentations/discussions/training reveal a strong interest in quantification and a need to further establish and complement methodology and establish data bases. For example the method used by forestry to identify “lahan kritis” needs to be evaluated for its use in spatial planning. There is also a further need to fully establish the hydrological conditions (e.g. application to large basins) to apply the peak flow model. Recommendations on organizational aspects for achieving WRM objectives through spatial management are as follows: 1. Prepare guidelines on the coordination of WR and spatial planning in line with the water law and spatial law and the (draft) regulations that cover the coordination; 2. Provide capacity building and advocacy to improve the quality of spatial planning; 3. Organize participation of the BBWS in the BKPRD; 4. Conclude an intergovernmental memorandum of understanding on cooperation; 5. Establish and monitor minimum service standards for spatial management; 6. Establish Water Assessment as a tool for safeguarding water interests in spatial management. These recommendations are described in more detail in the following paragraphs. 1. Advocacy and capacity building to improve the quality of spatial planning While for many years there have been e.g. forest areas officially designated as “protected” (kawasan lindungan), deforestation has continued almost unchecked and even increased in recent years. (See MODIS land use maps in final report B.2, chapter 3.) The question thus arises whether spatial management can actually be an effective instrument for guiding land use. International evidence suggests that it is, and the fact that this does not appear to have been true in Indonesia does not necessarily mean that development has occurred in contravention to local spatial management: it is very possible that land use in these areas has been covered by the necessary permits and that development is not (only) due to lack of enforcement but to poor spatial planning. By itself, the relatively new Law 26/2007 will not change much in this regard. After all, it provides instruments, but cannot guarantee their correct application. Due to capacity limitations, local officials may easily be tempted to use spatial planning to facilitate productive short term socio-economic development if they are unaware of, or do not understand and support, the long term need to preserve DHV, Deltares, MLD

33



protected areas. The remedy, therefore, lies not only in improved enforcement, but at least as much in advocacy and capacity building. 2. Participation of the BBWS in the BKPRD Given population and other pressures, water resources issues are of eminent strategic importance to all Java river basins, but especially so to the basins in the Jakarta metropolitan area. An effective way to ensure that these issues are effectively dealt with in spatial management planning could be giving the BBWS representation in both the provincial and relevant kabupaten / kota BKPRDs. It is may be a matter of debate whether this should involve full membership or be limited to observer status with the right to advise on water resources issues. Full membership might be difficult to achieve, since the BBWS is not a regional government institution, but it would give the BBWS sufficient profile to enable it to contribute its views to all relevant proposals on the table. (It is safe to assume that the BBWS will have no appetite for mingling in non-water related issues). Conversely, limiting the BBWS in the BKPRD to observer status might induce a reactive attitude and limit the opportunities for proactive participation. However, some representation is better than no representation, so if full membership is not possible it is definitely worthwhile to pursue this second best alternative. 3. Intergovernmental memorandum of understanding on cooperation To further improve coordination, again reflecting the strategic importance of water security on Java and especially in the Jakarta metropolitan area, and underlining the need to recognize water as an important structuring principle for spatial planning, the central, provincial, and local governments involved should conclude a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for cooperation in ensuring appropriate attention for water interests through spatial management at all levels. This would be self-binding on the governments involved and require no additional legislative or regulatory initiatives, and would provide further impetus to effective vertical and horizontal coordination. The understanding should include that spatial planning as such is not sufficient to effect the conditions for sustainable water resources management. Spatial planning is a terminal process focused on developing a document, i.e. the spatial plan, which may or may not be used as guiding principle for spatial management. Spatial management, a broader concept, is a continual process involving the use of the spatial plan as a basis for development, and fostering coordination of formulation and implementation of related sectoral policies to bring about change in spatial utilization by local stakeholders in social and economic development. To complement the MOU, the agencies involved should conclude a concrete Cooperation Agreement (PKS) specifying their respective tasks to implement the MOU, together with the resources they will make available to do this. 4. Maintaining minimum service standards for spatial management Law 26/2007 stipulates minimum service standards (SPM) as a basis for spatial utilization and for assessing functional performance of spatial management. These SPM should be seen in the context of the objective of spatial management: to realize a safe, pleasant, productive and sustainable space from an archipelagic and national defense perspective, including harmony between the natural and manmade environment, good stewardship in utilizing natural and artificial resources with consideration for human resources, and protection of spatial functions by preventing negative environmental impacts due to space utilization. (Art. 3.) While it may be difficult to determine uncontested performance indicators for outcomes such as a safe, pleasant, etc. space, it is possible to establish process indicators for spatial management. With appropriate transparency and accountability, such indicators would nudge the different government levels to not only establish criteria for the utilization of space but also, and perhaps more importantly, to effectively enforce such criteria to prevent giving in to diverging development pressures. Specifically, effective SPM would make it possible to hold the agency that is responsible for licensing, incentives and DHV, Deltares, MLD

34



disincentives, and sanctions accountable for implementation of the spatial management plan that has been agreed with all stakeholders and between all levels of government. Relevant SPM could relate to the detection and processing of violations of the spatial management plan, and more pressure could be brought to bear by giving members of the general public the possibility to complain about such violations. 5. Safeguarding water interests in spatial management through Water Assessment MOHA Regulation 50/2009 establishes BKPRD as the entity responsible for coordination between levels of government and between stakeholders in different sectors, but it does not describe how this coordination is to take shape. This makes it likely that coordination through the BKPRD will suffer the same fate as coordination through similar ad hoc coordination bodies in other sectors, which are characterized by broad membership, lagging attendance, much deliberation, and little coordinated implementation. Water Assessment would make coordination more effective in spatial management. The Water Assessment and the process related to its use could be described and agreed in the PKS complementing the MOU on intergovernmental cooperation mentioned earlier. As such, it would become self-binding on the signatories to the MOU and could even be introduced without amendment of any Law or regulation. Water assessment should be applied to all scales of spatial management planning, from national to local, and to all sorts of plans: urbanization, industrial areas, infrastructure, landscape planning, etc. A building permit itself may not be subject to Water Assessment, if the water interests have been sufficiently covered in the Water Assessment of the higherlevel plan, e.g. the detailed spatial plan at local level (RDTRD). Integrating water interests in spatial planning through Water Assessment would work in two ways: a plan is assessed on its implications for the water system, and the restraints that the water system puts on spatial use are made explicit. Water Assessment would not be meant as a new plan format or procedure, but to form part of the process of interaction in existing spatial planning procedures. Also the Strategic Environmental Assessment (KLHS) as prescribed by Law 32/2009 on environmental protection and management will provide information. Water Assessment, as part of the coordination process, would involve the two relevant actors: the spatial planning authority (local government, coordinated in the BKPRD) and the water authority (BBWS)4, and would go through three phases: 1. Initial phase – Agreement on water assessment criteria and cooperation during planning. As soon as ideas about the plan start developing, the spatial planning authority informs the BBWS. The BBWS provides information about the water system and priorities in water management for the specific area, and the two authorities together define the criteria for water that the urban and landscape designers and architects must take into consideration. 2. Developing phase – Issuing the Water Recommendation. The planning authority and the BBWS work interactively and creatively on the design of the plan. The resulting draft plan is formally submitted to the BBWS with a request for a Water Recommendation. The BBWS checks if the agreed criteria have been applied satisfactorily and formulates its Water Recommendation to inform the spatial planning authority of its findings, if necessary with recommendations for adjustment of the plan. 3. Decision making phase – Formulating the Water Chapter in the spatial plan. The spatial planning authority finalizes the plan based on the Water Recommendation of the BBWS. It may ignore (parts of) the Water Recommendation, but must motivate this decision. The spatial planning authority formulates a Water Chapter in the spatial plan, outlining the consideration given to water issues as a result of the WA 4

If the plan affects more than one BBWS jurisdiction (there are three BBWS in the Citarum basin), more than one water authority may be involved.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

35



process. Specifically, the Water Chapter must describe the Water Recommendation and how this has affected development of the plan. It is important to note that, as a process instrument, there are no fixed criteria in Water Assessment. The spatial planning authority and the BBWS together agree on relevant criteria in the initial phase. The criteria are thus tailor made for each individual plan and can concern all aspects of the water system in the area proposed for development: susceptibility to flooding, groundwater levels, soil subsidence, wastewater, drainage, and ecology. The criteria should be based on knowledge of the water system at hand, on all relevant legislation and policies, and on existing plans of a higher level authority. The level of detail of the criteria must fit the level of detail of the plan – the more the accent shifts from the choice of location to actual design, the more detailed criteria must be. If the BBWS has membership of the BKPRD, it will be aware of new plans for development as they arise. Apart from the requirement that the spatial planning authority must inform the BBWS as soon as new plans are being discussed, this gives further assurance that the BBWS can be involved from the very first stages of development. This will make it less likely that the planning authority only embarks on Water Assessment more or less as an afterthought in the final phase of plan formulation, and thus more likely that Water Assessment can positively contribute to planning and design and prevent the need for expensive compensatory measures to mitigate impacts on water interests that can no longer be accommodated in the plan itself.

3.4.

Developments in next period

Most activities under B.2 have been completed, except the finalization of the report on the extension and the completion of the support to the preparation of the Rencana, which is expected in September 2012.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

36


4.

SUB COMPONENT B.3

4.1.

Status Tasks B.3


All originally envisaged activities (Tasks B3-1, B.3-2 and B.3-3) have been completed, status presented in Annex G and H. Follow up is provided by the public policy specialist. Study on pricing of water supply services started in June 2011, and was completed in February 2012. Study on role sharing started in February 2012 and will be completed in September 2012. .

4.2.

Progress in implementation Tasks B.3

4.2.1 Task B3-1, B3-3 Groundwater Use in Bandung The work on this activity has been mostly completed in December 2010, and was finalized in June 2011 by submission of the draft final report. ADB provided comments in July 2011, but Dinas ESDM is continuously deliberating on comments. After all comments are received, the final report will be submitted, envisaged September 2012. Follow up activities are presented in section 4.3.1.

4.2.2 Task B3-2 Water Allocation in Jatiluhur Scheme The work on this activity was mostly completed in February 2011, and finalized after submission of the draft report in June 2011. After all comments are received, the final report will be submitted, envisaged July 2012. Two follow up activities have been implemented: (i) Study on pricing of bulk water supplied through West Tarum Canal, (ii) Agreement on Role sharing on water resources management in Jatiluhur scheme. These two follow up activities are reported below and in sections 4.3.2 and 4.3.3..

4.2.3 Bulk Water Pricing Study BBWSC has requested ADB to carry out a bulk water pricing study. This study started in June 2011. The methodology includes present and future scenario’s of infrastructure development. The study is designed to be carried out in a six months period by two national specialists (economist/TL and legal/institutional) and by one international consultant (economist). It should be noted that “Water Pricing” is an incorrect description of what is needed, because the constitution indicates that water is free. The term “Water Service Fee” is more appropriate, indicating payment to get the water from the source to the location where it is needed. During the study it was discovered that MPW already established a committee to formulate a suitable mechanism for determination of adequate water service fee, the so called Tim Tariff. Active participation from members of this team was pursued, especially the resource person Mr. Suharto Sarwan. After two initial meetings in Bandung, a third meeting was held in Jakarta on September 30, and this one was attended by representatives from all stakeholders, including members of the Tim Tariff, with active participation. During the last meeting on December 1 in Jakarta, the final conclusions were discussed, which resulted in a potential suitable methodology, although the tim tariff did not indicate they will follow this methodology. The results were published in the report in March 2012.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

37



4.2.4 Role sharing study The study on role distribution started in February 2012, and is implemented by the Public Policy Specialist and an international institutional specialist. Initially the study was more ambitious, and included also IWRM for the whole basin of Citarum, including reservoir operation, as well as management of small reservoirs (situ-situ), however, due to limitations of the budget available for extension, these additional aspects were deleted. Discussions were held with the three involved institutions BBWS, PJT II, Dinas PSDA West Java, and it was concluded that the aim should be to formulate a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) about the role distributions, because a regulation from the Minister should be generic, and is not applicable for a specific situation as this subject. A detailed proposal for task distribution has been prepared and agreed, and an overview of all available personnel with assigned tasks in the various institutions has been made available. It is expected that this will be completed in September 2012.

4.3.

Developments and Key Findings

4.3.1 Follow up on recommended groundwater policies and strategies. Recommended policies and strategies need to be followed up to enhance implementation. This follow up comprises formulation of MOUs for the relevant agencies responsible and/or involved in Water Resources Management. The Public Policy Specialist is completing this, in close cooperation with these agencies. An overview of the strategies and challenges to be followed up by MOUs/projects, and its progress, are presented in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Progress of follow up on Strategies B3 for Groundwater

Strategies

Considerations / Progress

1. New license procedures to harmonize district and provincial roles

Districts issue licenses, province has to provide technical advice and monitor sustainable use. If the districts do not follow the advice, and do not follow up warnings by province on threats in sustainable use, this leopardizes sustainable use. This has been discussed with ESDM West Java during several meetings, but no plans have been made to address this issue This item covers all other subjects, but it has been concluded that this is beyond the capacity of the provincial ESDM, and has to be followed up at higher levels. This is not further pursued under TA 7189 Package B. Inventory of data revealed: 1). Conflicting information on critical areas for groundwater use Bandung-Soreang based on inventories made by Dinas ESDM West Java in 2005 and 2010, and ESDM Jakarta in 2009 (scale 1: 25.000 and 1: 10.000); 2). Consultants prepared a clear overview of the various maps, and where these agree or where these conflict. 3). In meeting of May 29 between Dinas ESDM, Badan Geologi (Central Gov), Dinas SDA dan pertambangan kabupaten/ kota in Bandung Soreang and expert from ITB, it was concluded that conservation zone of groundwater map used as basis for licencing groundwater use is in latest map prepared by Dinas ESDM in 2010 This is part of the Rencana formulated under B.1.Not further pursued under Package B.3. This has been discussed with ESDM West Java during several meetings, but no plans have been made to address this issue This has been discussed with ESDM West Java during several meetings, but no plans have been made to address this issue

2. Strategy and Plan for managing Bandung groundwater basin 3. Strengthening Database and modeling in ESDM

4. Development of alternative surface water resources 5. Control illegal boreholes by registering drilling contractors 6. Enforcement on illegal groundwater usage, using public consultation/awareness 7. Link groundwater extraction with waste water discharges 8. Improve current pricing policy

This has been discussed with ESDM West Java during several meetings, but no plans have been made to address this issue This has been discussed with ESDM West Java during several meetings, but no plans have been made to address this issue

The Public Policy Specialist assisted the Provincial Groundwater Agency (ESDM) to assess where the most urgent problems existed in the Bandung basin. Three inventories were available, one from ESDM in Jakarta from 2009, and two from ESDM Bandung, from 2005 and

DHV, Deltares, MLD

38



2010. After presenting the differences between the various inventories, it was concluded that the latest study presented the most accurate descriptions of the present situation. No progress was made concerning the MoUs, because there have been many changes in heads of the agencies, and commitment to the original findings is limited. ESDM confirmed the conclusions and recommendations, but felt it did not have the mandate to address the issues as recommended.

4.3.2 Follow up on recommended surface water policies and strategies The Public policy specialist also provided follow up on the recommendations concerning surface water management. Progress is as presented in Table 4.2 on next page. Progress on Bulk Water Supply Fees and Role distribution in Jatiluhur scheme are reported in sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4.

4.3.3 Bulk Water Service Fee Key finding concerning Bulk Water Service Fee is that the matter is highly politicized. Rational considerations for distributing the cost for provision of raw water to bulk users exist, but when these are applied, powerful lobbies indicate that water is a social good, and users cannot be charged, or only at a reduced price. The study has formulated several methods to calculate a reasonable distribution of cost among the users, which will be used by the committee formulating a new Ministerial Decree (KEPMEN PU) for that. The work and report for the water service fee has provoked a lot of discussion, and contributed to a better understanding of rational fee determination. The coordination with the Tim Tariff greatly contributed to integration of the results. During the course of the study everybody agreed that 1. PJT II needs adequate resources for optimal maintenance and investment. 2. Best basis for distribution of contributions is the benefit each user has from proper supply. 3. The fee should not be based on the operational cost for one year with some depreciation, but be based on a forecast of operational cost and required investments over several years. 4. If certain users could not pay enough (PDAM) or not at all (irrigation / flood management), the central government should provide subsidies in the order of the contribution expected from these users, to ensure adequate funds for PJT II in line with conclusion 1. It should be standard procedure to include these funds in annual budgets. The study team and Tim Tariff could not agree on the final method. This is still under discussion. Tim Tarif did not want to include environmental cost in the final calculation, and therefore rejected the whole approach of the Long Run Maintenance Cost. They preferred more the short term approach, say a five year period. It was also not yet clear how much investments should be included (especially the pipeline of 5 - 15 m3/s - it is assumed that this will be a completely central government subsidy, we will address this in the RENCANA). In summary: we could not help them to finalize the discussions on fee determination, but have helped them to rationalize the discussion, and reach the four conclusions above.

4.3.4 Role Sharing Study Key findings from the Role Sharing study are that the overlaps and gaps in normal situation can be dealt with quite accurately, but during emergencies all resources should be made available, and this should be flexible and not limited by strict regulations. This has been laid down in the agreed task distribution. DHV, Deltares, MLD

39



Table 4.2 Progress of follow up on Strategies B3 on Water allocation

Strategies on Water Licensing 1. Delegation of licensing authority from Central to provincial Government

2. Operational Licenses for operators of reservoirs and head works On Water Allocation 3. Agreement on inter-basin transfer 4. Asses/regulate environmental flows

5. (Pre) flood reservoir operational rules (SOPs) to be revised. 6. Separation water conveyance system between irrigation and DMI (West Tarum Canal) 7. Development of a long term Water allocation On Irrigation 8. Flow monitoring for irrigation water distribution 9. Delegation of irrigation water distribution (O&M) from Central Gov (PJT II) to Provincial Government

10. WUA participation in water distribution for irrigation

11. Women participation in irrigation

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Considerations / Progress 1. Based on UU 7/2004 article 47(5): commercial use of water resources is encouraged. As a result some big, but many small corporations apply for licenses. This is too heavy burden to be handled all by Jakarta. Cost for process (travel from Jakarta to all over Indonesia) is too high, so only large requests are processed. This could be improved through deconcentration of permit issuance for surface water to the Province, which has legal basis, and is more practical. The Province did this already satisfactorily before UU 7/2004. However, not all stakeholders agree on this solution. Therefore additional discussions take place. In principle deconcentration for issuing surface water licenses is being accommodated in draft government regulation (RPP) of Water Right prepared by the Team supervised by Chief of subdit Pengaturan Directorat of Bina PSDA (Tommy Sitompul). No progress this period. In the coming period the situation may be more conducive with new director and new head of subdirectorate. 2. Operational licenses for operators of reservoirs and head works has been regulated in PP 37/2010 on Dams, article 83. Licenses are stipulated by minister Public Works. It is not clear who is responsible in case of disasters, and therefore more clarity is sought. Problem is how to deal with authorities at central and provincial level (see also item 5). No progress in this period. 3. DMI requested West Java for extra supply of 15 m3/s from Citarum river. This request is in process. Discussions are on-going about surface water taxes. No progress in this period. 4. Environmental flows have been regulated recently in PP 38/2011 on River, article 25. They should be equal to 95 % reliable flow. In extremely dry periods, this supply gets lower priority (in practice). The commission involved in formulating a follow up PERMEN for PP 38/2011 agreed that this was an important issue, and will discuss this in coming meetings. 5. Recommendations have been provided in July 2010, but new Kep Men PU did not provide a manual, only indicated that DGWR is in charge. Will be discussed in Dewan SDA. 6. This is done partly through the siphon at Bekasi in the West Tarum canal. Another siphon is existing at Cibeet crossing. In future there will be extra pipes especially for DMI. Complete separation is difficult and should be studied further under the Citarum loan., 7. Development of long term water allocation is partly accommodated in study of Strategic management Plan of 6 CI’s and a more detailed one in WISMP II. This item is not further pursued under Package B 8. Flow monitoring for irrigation water distribution of Jatiluhur irrigation system will be accommodated in package of modernization of Jatiluhur irrigation system under WISMP II 9. Delegation of irrigation water distribution (O&M) from Central to Provincial Government is already practiced through co-management (Tugas Pembantuan TP). As long West Tarum Canal has a double function for both irrigation and non irrigation, there is difficulty for PJT II to delegate O&M of irrigation canal to Provincial Government. For short term the best solution is agreement in MOU. The meetings have been held in June and July and more are expected in October. 10. Water Users Associations (WUA) participation in water distribution for irrigation has been regulated in PP 20/2006 on irrigation and Permen PU 33/PRT/M/2007 on WUA Strengthening for irrigation. But function of WUA in Jatiluhur is not effective, only 58 WUA for 240,000 ha. In principle Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) is responsible for WUA strengthening. Therefore a MoU between MoA and Public Works is under preparation. The MOU will cover : a. Development of irrigation infrastructures b. Processing of data c. Preparation of irrigation area. No specific activities on this subject. In principle it is agreed that WUA boards function better if there is at least one women in the board, and this is realized in most boards.

40



Current regulation is based on PP38/2008 on distribution of tasks and PP7/2010, for appropriate links to framing institutional responsibilities. Comparing PJT 1 and PJT 2, the capacity of PJT 2 is seriously limited because of its obligations for operation and maintenance of irrigation systems. PP7/2010 limited this obligation to only maintenance for main system (excluding the secondary system), but because several bulk users charged for bulk service fee are served from secondary systems, PJT 2 is still involved in maintenance of some secondary canals. It is expected that in July 2012 the final MoU will be signed. This MoU will indicate the matrix with distribution of tasks between the three organizations, and also includes an overview of available personnel for O&M, indicating position, location and organization paying the salary.

4.4.

Relevant Issues

1. Follow Up. Not much progress was made concerning the MoUs. This is partly because there have been many changes in heads of the agencies, and commitment to the original findings is limited. Moreover, most of these problems are beyond the capacity and/or mandate of the provincial Dinas. 2. Bulk Water Supply Service Fee. The results of the study have been intensively discussed with the Tim Tariff responsible in the Ministry iof Public Works for formulating the guidelines for establishing water supply fees. However, application completely depends on the preferences of the Tim Tariff. Still, the discussions enhance application of the results. 3. Role sharing. The study is expected to result in an MoU signed by the three institutions. However, an MoU is only valid for one year, and has to be renewed every year.

4.5.

Developments for the next Period

All activities for the Package B.3 have been completed. Draft reports have been submitted, and comments are awaited until the end of August. In September the final reports will be submitted. Finalization of the study on role sharing is expected to result in signing of the MoU in September 2012. After that the assignment of the public policy specialist will be terminated.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

41


DHV, Deltares, MLD


42



5.

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PACKAGE B

5.1.

Deliverables

Deliverables are expressed in reports. An overview of reports produced is given in Annex C. The Inception Period was completed at the end of April, 2010 according to schedule three months after full mobilization, although this is two months later than originally envisaged. Already 8 progress reports have been submitted, and four Semi Annual reports have been provided. The draft Final Report is envisaged to be submitted in October 2012, and the final version in November 2012. Draft Pola has been submitted in July 2011 (seven months after originally planned date), draft Rencana is envisaged in October 2012, although it should be emphasized that this depends on various factors, as reported in Chapter 2. Final report for B.2 has been submitted in May 2012. The draft report for the extension will be submitted in September 2012. The draft final report for B.3 has been submitted in June 2011. Finalization of B.3 report is late, because discussions are still ongoing with Dinas PSDA and Dinas ESDM in Bandung. The final report is expected to be issued in September 2012.

5.2.

Inputs

Assignments of staff planned and realized is indicated in Annex A up to 31 August 2012, including the extensions proposed and approved for VO4 on September 7. An operational budget in the Balais has become available. Budgets for 2011 and 2012 are , specified in Table 5.1 as follows: Table 5.1 Overview of budgets (M Rp) available (2011) and planned (2012) in the BBWS

BBWS 3 Cis BBWS Cil/Cis AVAILABLE IN 2011 TKPSDA 500 1200 POLA/Rencana 330 300 AVAILABLE/ REQUIRED FOR 2012 TKPSDA 600 1200 POLA/Rencana 350 500 State of Basin benchmarking TOTAL 950 1700

BBWS Citarum 500 750 500 750 250 (Required) 1250 - 1500

This amount is required for • Organization and implementation of the Public Consultation Meetings (one for RENCANA, for each Balai, BBWS Citarum already used all its budgetr for the first PCM in March). • Support establishment and operation of the Basin Council (TKPSDA). • Operational Budget for the counterparts.

5.3.

Contract and Variation Order

Original contract was signed on November 2009. Four variation orders (VO) have been proposed and approved. VO 1 was proposed to cope with changes identified under the

DHV, Deltares, MLD

43



inception report and was approved in December 2010. VO 2 was proposed to cope with the results of the review mission in Sept/Oct 2010 (VO 2), and was approved in June 2011 VO 3 included price escalation, and provided some preparation for the proposed extension; it was approved on February 27,2012. A fourth one, comprising an addendum based on extra activities, has been discussed on April 27, 2012 with the Indonesian Resident Mission, formally sent on May 15, 2012, and approved on September 7 2012. To cope with some urgent additional requirements because of the split of the 6 Cis RBT and the delay in Public Consultation Meetings, an extra VO5 will be proposed, which should cover remuneration and out of pocket expenses until the end of project implementation in December 2012. . Final adjustments in personnel planning and implementation, as well as out of pocket expenditures will be dealt with in the Final Financial Statement.of Eligible Cost at the end of the implementation of the study, envisaged in February 2013.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

44


Annex A Time Planning of Staff Including proposed for VO 4

DHV, Deltares, MLD

INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING for INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT in the 6 Ci's RIVER BASIN TERRITORY (PACKAGE ‐ B)

Annex A : Time of Staff including proposed for VO 4 NO.

NAME

MM prop

MM cont

MM VO1

MM VO2

MM VO3

B.1 1.1

35.0 16.0

‐3.4 ‐1.0

4.1

1.0

Aart van Nes

1.2

Jos Dijkman

8.0

‐1.2

0.7

1.3 13

Wil van der Krogt Wil van der Krogt

60 6.0

‐1 2 ‐1.2

07 0.7

1.4

Bart Adriaanse ^)

3.0

Total MM (up to VO 4)

MM VO4 ‐0.3 ‐1.0

Utilization MM up to up to August 2012

DURATION (YEARS) Rem. Balance MM

INCEPTION

COMPANY

Actual MOB

6.0 1.0

42.35 15.00

39.60 13.87

2.75 1.13

DHV

11 Nov

‐1.0

1.3

7.80

7.59

0.21

Deltares

30 Jan

10 1.0

25 2.5

‐0.5 0.7

0.5

9 00 9.00

9 01 9.01

‐0 01 ‐0.01

Deltares

7 feb 7 feb

2.50

2.49

0.01

Demis

14 feb

1.20

0.90

0.30

Deltares

17‐May

2.00

2.00

0.00

Euroconsult

17‐May

1.00

0.41

0.59

Deltares

9‐Apr

1 50 1.50

1 50 1.50

0 00 0.00

DHV

5‐Jun 5 Jun

1.5

R. Venimmen

1.6

W. Giesen ^)

1.7

Janjaap Brinkman/ Eelco v Beek

1.8 18

Alexander Mueller Alexander Mueller

1.9

Rudolf van Ommen ^)

0.70

0.73

‐0.03

DHV

29‐Feb

1.10

Sjoerd Kerstens

1.4

1.40

1.05

0.35

DHV

26‐Apr

1.11

Marco Kertsholt

0.25

0.25

0.05

0.20

DHV

1‐Jun

52.4

365.20 30.00

332.85 28.15

32.35 1.85

MLD

11 Nov

12.00

11.77

0.23

MLD

3 May

29.00

25.81

3.19

MLD

1 Feb

2.0 2.0

‐1.0 15 1.5 0.7

185.0 30.0

7.0

84.0

1.12

Hendarti

1.13

Adam Yazid

1.14

Hariyanto

18.0

1.15

Asep Teguh Soekmono

20.0

‐2.0

1.16

Bambang Warsito

6.0

6.0

1.17

Dedi Kusnadi

1.18

Dina Saptiarini

1.19

Ika Andriana Kurniawati

1.20

Fery Ika Hardiyanto

1.21

Rahmi Krishna Sari

1.22

Tarasinta Perwitasari

26.9

9.9

12.0 2.0

9.0 2.0

6.0

26.00

26.65

‐0.65

PTW

1 Feb

2.0

4.7

4.0

22.70

22.57

0.13

WGA

15 feb

8.00

6.93

1.07

MLD

1 June

12.0

2.0

3.0

5.0

22.00

20.13

1.87

MLD

8 Feb

‐4.0

2.0

‐1.2

12.80

12.98

‐0.18

MLD

11 Nov

4.2

8.0

12.20

7.34

4.86

Wiratman

2‐Jan

12.0

2.0

3.0

5.0

22.00

19.41

2.59

MLD

6 Jan

4.0

‐1.6

2.40

2.45

‐0.05

MLD

26‐Oct

13.60

12.07

1.53

MLD

4‐Jul

5.70

5.73

‐0.03

MLD

18 Jan

16.40

16.44

‐0.04

MLD

1 March

4.00

0.00

4.00

MLD

8.0 18.0

‐2.0

1.23

Cut Endah

1.24

Satria Suryahadi

8.0

4.6 9.0

9.0

‐2.3

1.25

M. Farid Rahman

1.26

Indrawan Suryadi

6.0

2.0

1.27

Mohammad Alif M.

12.0

‐1.0

‐11.0

1.28

Nicolaas Darismanto

20.0

‐2.0

6.0

1.29

Guntoro

1.30

Heru Suprianto

1.31

Nugraha Kunwardi A.

1.32

Praya Arie I

1.33

Renyasih

1.34

Syafril Salim

1.35

Isja Dini Ulijati ^)

3.0

1.36

Johan Subarkah ^)

8.0

1.37

Bambang Triono

1.38

Puguh Saktiono ^)

‐0.6

4.0

0.00

0.00

0.00

TB

3.0

27.00

24.58

2.42

MLD

11 Nov

‐1.6

8.40

8.35

0.05

TB

25 Feb

9.00

8.90

0.10

Geo

15 feb

6.00

3.03

2.97

PTW

15 feb

8.0

8.00

6.08

1.92

MLD

5 May

‐10.0

20.00

19.78

0.22

MLD

1 Feb

3.50

3.55

‐0.05

Geo

1 Feb

1.10

1.15

‐0.05

Macon

3 May 22 Feb

10.0 16.0

‐1.0

‐4.0

‐2.0

6.0 24.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

9.0

‐1.0

‐8.5 1.5

‐3.4

4.0

6.00

4.60

1.40

TB

4.5

4.50

4.48

0.02

MLD

6‐Feb

2.0

14.00

11.74

2.26

Indec

11 Feb

1.39

M. Nidhom Azhari

4.4

4.0

11.40

11.26

0.14

TB

1‐Mar

1.40

Bambang Tata

5.0

1.0

6.00

5.91

0.09

MLD

6‐Jun

1.41

Imam Hudori

2.0

‐1.5

0.50

0.00

0.50

MLD

1.42

Indra Firmansyah

B.2 2.1

Poul Grashoff

2.2

Robert Verhaeghe

2.3

Wim Giesen ^)

2.4 2.5

Erik van der Zee Bart Adriaanse ^)

2.6

17.0 10.0

‐2.2 ‐2.2

0.0

0.5 0.5

1.5

Eduard Westinga

1.5

‐1.5

1.0

2.7

Michiel Benjamin Rudolf van Ommen ^)

2.9

Poernomoshidi Poerwo

2.10

Iskandar Nugroho

2.11

Dedi Kusnadi ^)

2.13

Yogi A (Replaced by Suherwan)

2.14

Suherwan

2.15

Dasril Rathman

2.16

Johan Subarkah ^)

2.17

Raymond Kemur

B.3 3.1

Alex Hamming

3.2

0.0

4.0 ‐3.0 0.5

2.8

3.0

‐2.0

3.0

43.0 18.0

‐5.0 ‐4.0

20.0

2.0

12.0 4.0

6.0

1.0

1.00

1.02

‐0.02

MLD

4.8 1.0

20.05 9.30

19.67 9.20

0.38 0.10

Demis

15 feb

1.5

5.50

5.31

0.19

Demis

22 Feb

0.00

0.00

0.00

Euroconsult

1.5

0.00 3.50

0.00 3.50

0.00 0.00

DHV Demis

0.00

0.00

0.00

Demis

13.0

2.0

‐1.0

1.00

0.93

0.07

Demis

3‐Jul

0.75

0.72

0.03

DHV

14‐May

9.7

81.70 18.00

72.15 17.18

9.55 0.82

MLD

15 feb

‐1.1

4.90

4.94

‐0.04

PTW

1 Mar

5.00

4.39

0.61

MLD

1‐Jun

‐0.7

16.30

16.32

‐0.02

MLD

22 feb

4.0

5.0

9.00

5.28

3.72

MLD

2‐Jan

4.0

2.0

18.00

17.22

0.78

MLD

15 feb

6.00

5.82

0.18

TB

22 Feb

4.5

4.50

1.00

3.50

MLD

1‐May

0.0

16.50 8.80

17.84 10.26

‐1.34 ‐1.46

DHV

24 Nov

5.00

5.07

‐0.07

EuroMott

5 feb

1.50 1 50

1.01 1 01

0.49 0 49

Deltares

31 Jul 31‐Jul

6.0 ‐0.8

0.0

14 Feb

0.75

5.0 15.0

6‐Apr

21.0 11.0

‐3.2 ‐2.2

Paul Taylor

6.0

‐1.0

3.3 33

Eelco van Beek Eelco van Beek ^))

4.0 40

3.4

Jeroen Alberts

0.7

0.70

0.70

0.00

DHV

2‐Aug

3.5

Bart Teeuwen ***

0.5

0.50

0.80

‐0.30

DHV

18‐May

3.5

Johannes Wibowo

53.90 11.20

54.41 11.20

‐0.51 0.00

3.6

2.0 ‐2 0

‐0.5

0.5 ‐0 5

49.0 14.0

4.0 ‐2.0

8.0

‐3.9 ‐0.5

MLD

3 Dec

M. Nidhom Azhari (continued as B.1, I.36)

6.0

6.0

‐4.0

4.6

12.60

12.62

‐0.02

TB

11 Jan

3.7

Zulkarnain

8.0

‐2.0

‐6.0

0.00

0.00

0.00

TIA

3.8

Pratolo Priyambodo

4.0

‐4.0

0.00

0.00

0.00

TIA

3.9

Soenarto

6.80

6.84

‐0.04

MLD

3.10

Isja Dini Ulijati ^)

6.0

4.50

4.55

‐0.05

Macon

3 May

3.11

Muhammad Imam

6.0

0.5

6.50

6.41

0.09

MLD

18 Jan

3.12

Ahmad Pribadi ^)

‐1.7

3.13

Yaya/ Puguh Saktiono ^)

3.14

Krismahadianto***/Beny Herwayan

5.0

‐1.7

‐1.5 4.0

5.0

3.5

‐3.2 ‐0.3

0.0

2.30

2.27

0.03

MLD

1 June

‐5.0

0.00

0.00

0.00

Macon

11 feb

10.0

10.00

10.52

‐0.52

MLD

6 Jan

74 92 74.92 453.96 528.89

‐6 6.72 72 ‐16.70 ‐23.42

579.7 Original Plan Plan Time spent Revised Planning for VO 3 Revised Planning for VO 4 Deleted Allocation

73 00 73.00 277.00 350.00

1 June

MM Foreign MM Foreign MM Local MM Total

68 20 68.20 434.70 502.90

2009 Nov/Des Jan 1 2

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010

Feb Mar Apr May Jun 5 6 3 4 7

Jul 8

Aug Sep 9 10

Oct Nov Dec 11 12 13

BASIN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN 2011 Jan 14

Feb Mar Apr May Jun 15 16 17 18 19

3/7

Jul 20

8/18

`

12/32

Aug Sep 21 22

Oct Nov Dec 23 24 25

Jan 26

CONSOLIDATION 2012 Feb Mar Apr May Jun 27 28 29 30 31

Jul 32

Aug Sept Oct Nov 33 34 35 36

1/6


Annex B Training Report

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Annex B – Training Program


Training Program for QPR 10 1. Introduction Training program in 6 Cis project (TA 7189-INO) are related to project approach on capacity building. The objective for capacity building is formulated in the TOR as follows: “Introduce and effectively deliver holistic IWRM principles to the water sector in the 6 Cis River Basin Territory, through strengthening of a wide range of organisations and their related legal and regulatory framework in water resources protection, water services provision and river basin management”. In our vision, there are three levels of capacity building: individual level, organization level and sistem or enabling environment level. Even though the three levels are interdependent, this training program focus on individual level. Organization and environment level will be covered by other sub component in this project. Training is directly related to the skills, knowledge, and strategies necessary to do a particular job. It can include teaching new skills, exposing unfamiliar ideas, giving the chance to practice and get feedback on particular techniques or styles of working with people, or simply encouraging discussion about the work. And it can, and should, be ongoing throughout all project activities. (The Community Tool Box: http://ctb.ku.edu). Following all those thoughts, the objective of training program in 6 Ci’s project is “strengthening stakeholder skills, knowledge, attitudes, motivation and work ethics to implement IWRM principles to the water sector in the 6 Cis river basin territory”. This training program involves: 1. Members of the TKPSDA, both government and non-government. 2. RBMO staffs. 3. Counterparts of 6 Cis project. 1.1. Training Program for Members of the TKPSDA Training program for members of the TKPSDA is part of capacity building of stakeholders (Task B1-1). This task included establishment of Water Councils (TKPSDA) and empowerment of stakeholders (members of TKPSDA), to create conducive environment for proper governance in balanced participation of stakeholders. It is a continuous process, initially with focus on awareness and mobilization, evolving into active participation and information sharing. 1.2. Training Program for RBMO Staffs Training program for RBMO staffs is part of capacity building of RBMOs (Task B1-2). This task includes training for staff, and enabling measures at RBMO level or even sector level if needed, to enable trained staff to apply their new skills. Training program for RBMO staffs will generate general skills development for IWRM and specific skills for the planning process and specific follow up topics. Joining with counterparts, we have involved RBMO staffs in our training activities. 1.3. Training Program for Counterparts This part of the program has received the most attention. For counterpart , a training program has numerous benefits: (1) it makes them feel that the project is supportive of them; (2) a training program can help to convince counterpart of the culture (value) of the project's philosophy and methods; (3) it helps them to become continually more competent at what they do; (4) it increases their knowledge of the field by introducing them to the latest research and theory; (5) it can expose them to new ideas which ultimately may improve their own effectiveness and that of the organization; (6) it can expose them to other practitioners with different -- and perhaps better -methods. In designing the training program for counterpart, we've chosen to define it as professional development, leading either to specific new knowledge, or to the next level of expertise. DHV, Deltares, MLD



Training program for counterpart should be scheduled regularly, as part of the operation of the project. That’s what we call as capacity building integrated on project activities. In the end of the training program, the counterparts’ skills, knowledge, and strategies to develop, supervise and implement POLA and RENCANA will have increased. In this scheme, learning topics will cover issues of conservation, utilization, mitigation, information system and community participation. We also develop their skills to identify issues, analyse problems, design and assess alternative, select alternative, action planning, implementation and evaluation. As a basic of these learning topics, we try to shift their paradigm and motivation as a profesional in water resources management.

This tenth Quarterly Progress Report presents the progress of training activities from the beginning of the project until July 2012. This report also presents major issues affecting training implementation (chapter 4) and activities for next period (chapter 6).

2. Development during this Period 2.1. Training Program for Members of the TKPSDA Base on aspiration of members of the TKPSDA, on April 3rd 2012, we facilitated review book of 6 Ci’s Pola for all members of the TKPSDA. This activity aims to strengthen members of the TKPSDA’s knowledge about substances and the making process of 6 Ci’s Pola. In order to achieve the objective, we facilitated this learning process by using method: reading Pola – small group discussion – getting feedback from 6 Ci’s specialists. This review was conducted in 3 classes, as same as commissions of the TKPSDA: conservation, water resources utilization, and control of water destructive power. In each classes, the discussion was running in small groups (7-10 persons). After reading 6 Ci’s Pola, the small group discussions were guided by 5 questions: (1) which experiences that make them being proud while working in 6 Cis?; (2) what are their dreams for 6 Cis RBT?; (3) what are the 3rd most problems in 6 Cis?; (4) list 5 potential things to strengthen IWRM in 6 Cis RBT; (5) list targets, strategies and responsible parties to achieve their dreams as simultaneous as solving 6 Cis problem and utilizing potential things to strengthen IWRM in 6 Cis RBT. After the presentation of group discussion, we facilitated advanced discussions between all participants and 6 Ci’s specialists. We made a documentary film in this activity and the activity on the next day, April 4th 2012, public consultation meeting for formulation of Rencana. This film tried to depict the missions and challenges of the TKPSDA 6 Cis RBT. DHV, Deltares, MLD



Presidential decree 2/2012 splited the 6 Cis RBT in three new RBT. This decision has impacts on TKPSDA 6 Cis RBT. For this moment, we decided to postpone training need assessment for TKPSDA and all training activities related to TKPSDA. 2.2. Training Program for RBMO Staffs Joining with counterparts, we have involved RBMO staffs in our training activities. They are junior staffs with high motivation to learn. All training activities which involved RBMO staffs will describe at the training program for counterpart section.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Name Anjar D. Krisnanta Radhika Mohammad Fauzi Gok Ari Joso Simamora Sumarno Pandu Yuri Pratama Ahmad Taufik Ishana Pramawidhana Arief Kautsar

Working Unit RCMU Bappenas Puslitbang SDA Puslitbang SDA PJT II Jatiluhur Subdit Data Informasi, Bina Program, BPSDA Hidrologi, BPSDA Balai Datin SDA, PSDA Jabar Dinas PU DKI Jakarta Dinas PU Banten

At the first time, in the training of formulation of rencana, on June 12-15th 2012, we involved junior staffs from other BBWS.

1 2 3 4 5 6 2.3.

Name Reski Handarwati M.Hendrie S. Rigakittyndya T. Yeni Marliani Supena Wahyu S.

Working Unit BBWS Bengawan Solo BBWS Pemali Juana BBWS Serayu Opak BBWS Cimanuk Cisanggarung BBWS Citanduy BBWS Brantas

Training Program for Counterparts

Most attention was given to the training of the counterparts. We are pleased to mention that almost all counterparts from PU, comprising two (three were originally envisaged) from DG for Spatial Planning, two from DGWR Jakarta and two from each BBWS, have participated in implementation of package B. They are all junior staff, but with good education (S.1 and S.2) and high motivation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Name Yuddi Yudistira, ST Indah Salvia Amin, ST Rigasony Tiamono, ST Bima Ragil Saputra, ST M. Rian Wahyu Kesumo, ST, M.Eng Ferdinanto, ST Angga Prawirakusuma, ST, MT Cecep Muhtaj Munajat, ST, MPSDA Meita Rudianingsih, S.Si Aryo Hudiotomo, ST

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Working Unit Staf Dit. BPSDA Ditjen SDA Staf Dit. BPSDA Ditjen SDA Staf BBWS Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian Staf BBWS Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian Staf BBWS Ciliwung-Cisadane Staf BBWS Ciliwung-Cisadane Staf BBWS Citarum Staf BBWS Citarum Staf Direktorat Penataan Ruang Wilayah II Staf Direktorat Penataan Ruang Wilayah II



As Cecep Muhtaj Munajat, ST, MPSDA could no longer active because of his new assignment in BBWS Citarum, we involved new junior staffs from BBWS Citarum.

1 2

Name Willy Raharjo, ST Zacky Abibakar, ST

Working Unit BBWS Citarum BBWS Citarum

As we decided that capacity building for counterpart should be integrated in project activities, we have involved the counterparts in all activities of 6 Ci’s project. They participated in our internal team meeting (bi-weekly), our external meeting with BKPRD, etc, our focus group discussion with BWRMC, our meeting with ADB, our workshop in formulating POLA, and of course in our training and field trip. However, it should be noted that not all of them could follow these activities. Twenty one technical trainings were given to counterparts and RBMO staffs. These trainings cover hydrological analysis Hymos, Ribasim and its various features, Java Spatial Model, and water zooning (concept and application).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Technical Training Hydrological Analysis Hymos - FWES-Series 1 Hydrological Analysis Hymos - FWES-Series 2 Hydrological Analysis Hymos - FWES-Series 3

Component B.1 B.1 B.1

Training Ribasim Training Java Spatial Model v 2.1 Schematization of RBT for water balance model Training B2 - Water Zoning Teknik Zoonasi Java Spatial Model 2.2 Hymos Review Book of Draft Pola Java Spatial Model v 2.2  Review basic concept of JSM  Simulating alternative scenario (exercise initiated by Aryo from DGSP) Water demand for irrigation and DMI  Water demand for agriculture  Water demand for DMI Training Ribasim Forum Group Discussion Erosion Peak Flow 1 Peak Flow 2 Rencana formulation JSM 2.2 Delta Netter

B.1 B.2 B.1 B.2 B.2 B.2 B.1 B.1 B.2

Date 19-21 May 2010 24-27 May 2010 31 May - 3 June 2010 25-28 Oct. 2010 01-02 Nov. 2010 18-19 March 2011 16 June 2011 6 July 2011 02 August 2011 05-06 Oct 2011 21-22 Oct 2011 21 December 2011

B.1

9 Feb 2012

B.1 B. 2 B.2 B.2 B. 2 B.1 B.2 B.2

28-29 Feb. 2012 5 June 2012 7-8 June 2012 11-12 June 2012 12-13 June 2012 12-15 June 2012 26 June 2012 28 June 2012

We conducted 4 field trips. With these activities, we develop counterpart’s knowledge of the field by introducing them to the society, latest water resource conditions, and expose them to new ideas of water resources management. At the last field trip, Cidanau field trip, we combined technical training (Ribasim) and motivational training (professionalism). Field Trip DHV, Deltares, MLD

Topics have been discussed



1

Ciliwung Field Trip (23-24 Juli 2010)

2

Citarum Field Trip (6-7 Agustus 2010)

3

Cinangneng Field Trip (18-19 November 2010)

               

4

Cidanau/Anyer fieldtrip (16  – 18 Maret 2011)   

Conservation Water allocation Water Pollution Mitigation Community Participation Conservation Water allocation Water Pollution Freire consciesness Multi perspective communication Gender Tree problem analysis Vision for water resources management Structural and non-structural problem for water resources management Shifting government’s roles for WR management Develop government-private-community’s role for water resources management Ribasim Self image of a Professional Become a Professional in water resources management Field visit pumping station Cidanau

As a preparation before Pola comparative study in Brantas river, we sent 3 e-Learning to all counterparts. At every package of learning object, counterparts will answer the pre test, studying the knowledge material and then doing the post test. At the first e-Learning, counterparts learned about concept of RBO Performance Benchmarking. At the second, they learned about the result of PJT I Performance Benchmarking. And at the last one, counterparts learned about Pola of Brantas RBT. This table below shown counterparts which taked e-Learning and its score. Nama 1 2 3 4

Yuddi Yudistira, ST Indah Salvia Amin, ST Rigasony Tiamono, ST M. Rian Wahyu Kesumo, ST, M.Eng

e-Learning 1 Pre test Post test 69 93,3 64 74,9 91,6 96,6 84,9 96,6

e-Learning 2 Pre test Post test 40,7 76,6

e-Learning 3 Pre test Post test 50,8 70 72,5 80

3. Evaluation 3.1.

Effectiveness

One obvious ways to determine the effectiveness of our training program is Feedback from counterpart. At the last session of our training/fieldtrip activities, counterpart always give feedback about their understanding of learning material, performance of facilitator, performance of resources person, performance of participants, accomodation, transportation, lesson learned, their learning needs and their recommendation for the next training. Counterparts and RBMO staffs which returns the entire training evaluation sheet states that the training/field trip was very beneficial and highly contextual with their work. Therefore they said that they would use what was they learned on training/field trips in their workplace. They also committed to share what was they learned with their colleagues.

DHV, Deltares, MLD



As a state apparatus, this trip otherwise revive the awareness that the sacrifice for the country can start from small things, from ourselves. Also stated that the attitude of a good bureaucrat is to serve and protect the society, willing to plunge into the field and take a stance/decision with no/less popular that its impact is felt both in the community. Scheme for counterpart training program which has been used in projects 6 Cis has been capable of helping counterpart to achieve their hopes to understand the preparation of POLA and RENCANA. This learning scheme combining the development of skills, knowledge and self-reform. 'friendly relationship' and 'encouraging learning atmosphere' was instrumental in helping the learning process in the 6 Cis. Generally, all trainers was considered “good”. All trainers was considered communicative and friendly. Using of case study and practice methods were also considered to be very helpful. During April 2011, Counterpart project 6 Cis asked to provide the evaluation through a questionnaire evaluation of learning activities undertaken Counterpart 6 Cis project. Here are some topics and evaluation findings:  Counterparts generally have expectations from 6 Cis Project: gaining knowledge/new skills, getting input effective way of working, known for their superior, actively involved in the formulation of POLA and RENCANA, opportunity to practise their knowledge, earning extra income, getting new networks, and actively involved in the formation TKPSDA 6 Cis. Most counterparts stated that they got benefit according to their expectations. Other benefits derived from the different atmosphere in the office everyday activities (refresh and fun), sharing experiences and getting a very supportive work Laptop.  7 of 9 Counterparts stated that the training program for counterpart scheme which has been used in projects 6 Cis help Counterpart to achieve their hopes to understand the preparation of POLA and RENCANA. They stated that they got better understanding how to manage natural resources and all the problems that exist in natural resource management. They also have been getting to know the stages of formulation POLA, including portraits of the problems and potential conditions in the area of 6 Cis project.  "The existence of his fellow counterpart and support from team of consultants was very effective in providing an understanding of POLA" stated as an important role in helping the learning process in the 6 Cis. Other supported factors are the use of methods fieldtrip, access to information, freedom of discussion, the facilities provided and the support of the Kepala Balai. Meanwhile, the most difficult barrier came from “schedule of learning activities on the 6 Cis project often clash with the burden of office tasks to be done”.

3.2.

Efficiency

We defined efficiency as whether the funding was sufficient and the money was used prudently, not wasteful. This is how we work: we always apply the prudential principles in resource management. We always use ADB standarts in budgeting and sent it to ADB to get approval. At every training evaluation sheets, Participants of the trainings stated that they felt comfortable with the accomodation and all learning facilities.

3.3.

Relevance with the Project Indicators

This table below shown the relevance of training with the project indicator. DHV, Deltares, MLD



Project Specific Indicators Water Resources Council operating effectively and making appropriate decisions and recommendations to GOI. Capacity of water management agencies to make decisions in an IWRM context improved. Pola and rencana for 6 Ci's River Basin Territory completed and approved by GOI, and implementation commenced Reports containing recommendations for further work to improve technical capacity prepared and submitted Reports containing recommendations on improved institutional framework for O&M of water infrastructure prepared and submitted and endorsed by DGWR All three Balai Besar strengthened in the areas: (i) leadership and teamwork: i.a. Pro active attitude i.b. Self Confidence i.c. Team work DHV, Deltares, MLD

Hydrological Analys Hymos‐ FEWS 1,2,3

Water demand (DMI and irrigation)

Delta Netter

Ribasim

Schematisation, water balance

Review book of Pola

Formulation Rencana

JSM 2.1 and JSM 2.2

Water zoning (technical zonasi)

Erosion – Peak Flow

Field trip 1,2,3,4

Circle coaching

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

V

V

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

V

V



(ii) human resources management, (iii) financial planning and management Meta database designed, implemented and operational Decision support tool designed, implemented and accessible to all relevant agencies and their staff "State of the basin" reporting system in place and reports being produced and submitted annually RENCANA recommendations included for investment program under national budget in 2013 Timely RENCANA formulation and increased capacity of Balai Besar staff to operate model and prepare master plans Main investment programmed to improve water quality and increased coordination with related agencies (Ministry of Environment, Human Settlement and Housing, Ministry of Public Works)

+

+

+

V

V

+

+

V

Note: V = Direct Contribution of Training + = Partly Contribution of Training

DHV, Deltares, MLD

+

V

V

V

V

V

V

+

+

+



4. Major Issues As impact of Presidential Decree 2/2012, TKPSDA 6 Cis RBT have to split in three new TKPSDA. We have had a meeting with DGWR and the three River Basin Organizations (BBWS) to follow up this situation. We have committed to support the establishment of new TKPSDA. For this moment we decided to postpone all training activities related to TKPSDA. New Director of Water Resource Management, DGWR, Dr. Ir. Arie Setiadi Moerwanto, M.Sc., has full concern about training program for counterpart. He insist that knowledges transfer in formulating Pola dan Rencana has to be occured from consultant to DGWR, especially counterparts. Our training invitation lately signed by the director. He also decided to involve BBWS junior staffs from outside 6 Cis RBT in order to take lesson learned how 6 Cis Project formulate Rencana.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations 5.1.

What has been Good

Counterparts 6 Cis project and RBMO staffs consists of smart people with a high desire to learn. More than just making the learning as a discourse of change, they are committed to implement the learning outcomes in work and their daily lives. The leadership of each institution in which counterparts and RBMO staffs are active is also committed to support the learning process. Scheme for counterpart training program which has been used in projects 6 Cis has been capable of helping counterpart to achieve their hopes to understand the preparation of POLA and RENCANA. This learning scheme combining the development of skills, knowledge and self-reform. 'friendly relationship' and 'encouraging learning atmosphere' was instrumental in helping the learning process in the 6 Cis.

5.2.

What can be better/Possible Improvement

Generally, counterpart’s knowledge about reality of water resource management in the field still need to be improved. Teamwork is still not running as expected. Counterparts have not been able to solve the problems of distance and time between them and raises the need to cooperate. Their Mastery of Ribasim and JSM counterpart is still not evenly distributed and not 'full'. Although the Kepala Balais have committed to support the project activities in the 6 Cis learning activities, However, they have only limited time for participating in the 6 Cis project, because DGSP, DGWR and especially the BBWS have limited personnel. If they only participate in a number of short courses, their ownership of the problems and solutions as well as their skill on implementing the developed tools will be limited. We promoted e-Learning program as a stimulan for counterpart to raise their passion to learn. We also announced that these acitivities as a entry point to fieldtrip Malang. But we were little surprise by the low participation of counterpart in e-Learning program. We will evaluate what was happened.

DHV, Deltares, MLD



6. Activities for Next Period There will be the last training for Ribasim. This last training will covers 2 learning topics: (1) water resources analysis (defining measures and strategies, running the model, analyzing the results, presentation and evaluation of results in score card); and (2) Flow composition and basic water quality. At the last days, there will be a final test for all participants to measure the grade in which the above objectives are reached. New technical team to evaluate draft Pola in DGWR was being established. This new technical team will also consist of researchers and academics, besides personels from internal DGWR. To strengthen the capacity of this new team, Director of Water Resources Management, DGWR, take the initiative to conduct training cooperate with 6 Cis Project. This training will covers two topics: “what is Pola” and “How we (6 Cis Project) make it”. Both 6 Cis consultants and participants will share their experinces, knowledge and ultimately problem solving leading either to spesific new knowledge or to the next level of expertise. As this new technical team established, we will facilitate this training.

1

Activities Ribasim training

2

Training for new technical team

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Participants Time Counterparts and October 2012 RBMO staffs Technical team of Pola

Appendix B.1 : Attendance of the Participants in Training 6 Ci Training

No.

Name

Institution

Hydrological Analysis Hymos ‐ FWES‐Series 1



Ribasim

Java Spatial Model

Ribasim series II & Field Trip

Water Zooning

Teknik Zoonasi

Java Spatial Model 2.2

Hymos ‐ Calibration

Riview POLA

Java Spatial Model 2.2 (review concept and exercise)

Water Demand

Ribasim

USLE erosion model

Peak Flow Model

Rencana 6 Ci

Teknik Analisis dampak Zonasi berbasis SDA dengan model JSM

1a

1b

1c

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Jakarta

Bandung

Jakarta

Bogor

Jakarta

Anyer

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

19‐21 May 2010

24‐27 May 2010

31 May‐3 June 2010

25‐28 October 2010

1‐2 November 2010

16‐19 March 2011

16 June 2011

6 July 2011

2 August 2011

5‐6 October 2011

21‐22 October 2011

21 December 2011

9 February 2012

28‐29 February 2012

7‐8 June 2012

11‐13 June 2012

12‐15 June 2012

26 June 2012

 

 

  

 

 



     

       



 

       





 

Counterpart 6 Ci 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Yuddi Y. Indah S. A. M.Rian W. K. Ferdinanto Rigasony T. Bima R. S. Angga P. Cecep M. M. Aryo H. Meita R.

11 12 13 14 15

Hariyanto Zaky Abi Bakar Wily Raharjo Anjar Dwi Krisnanta Kurnia Ramadhan

16 17 18 19 20

Ihsanul Fitrah Sumarno Indra Surya W. IGN. C. Andi Baskara Fajar B. Wicaksono

Staf Dit Bina Penatagunaan SDA Staf Dit Bina Penatagunaan SDA Staf BBWS Ciliwung Cisadane Staf BBWS Ciliwung Cisadane Staf BBWS Cidanau Ciujung Cidurian Staf BBWS Cidanau Ciujung Cidurian Staf BBWS Citarum Staf BBWS Citarum Staf Dit. Perencanaan Umum Tata Ruang Staf Dit. Data Informasi & Komunikasi Tata Ruang

 

   

 



 



 

      

 

  



 



   

 



Other Counterpart 6 Ci 

Staf BBWS Citarum Staf BBWS Citarum Staf BBWS Citarum RCMU RCMU

  









 









  

  



Dir. PSDA Staf Dit Bina Penatagunaan SDA Staf Dit Bina Penatagunaan SDA Staf Dit Bina Penatagunaan SDA Staf Dit Bina Penatagunaan SDA Staf Dit Bina Penatagunaan SDA

 



  



Other DGWR 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Fuad Adrian Iskandar Yuli Rianhar Oscar M. Gessang Nugroho Widi Susanto Anggun Etika Putriasri Sevi Inasih Gama Ilmy Hartanto Pandu Yuri Pratama



Staf Dit Bina OP SDA Staf Dit Bina OP SDA Staf Dit Bina Program SDA Staf Dit Bina Program SDA Staf Dit SunDaWa PSDA Staf Dit SunDaWa PSDA Staf Dit Data & Informasi SDA Staf Dit Hidrologi SDA

 

 



   











Other BBWS 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

Reski Hendarwati M. Hendrie S. Rigakittyndya T. Yeni Marliani Supena Sigit Irawan Wahyu Setianto

36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51

S. Amirwandi Waluyo Hatmoko Radhika Levina Mirwan Wildan H. Heruyoko Ika Damayanti S. Angela Sari Ulina Sri Rahayu Muh. Fauzi Rasidatu Diniah Gina Lisnawati Winda Statika Dedih Setiadi Segel Ginting

      

Staf BBWS Bengawan Solo Staf BBWS Pemali Juana Staf BBWS Serayu Opak Staf BBWS Cimanuk Cisanggarung Staf BBWS Citanduy Staf BBWS Citanduy Staf BBWS Brantas

PUSAIR Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung Pusair Bandung

     

     

 

  





 

 



      



 













   

PJT 52 53 54 55 56

Reny Mayasari Gok Ari Joso Anom Herudjito Hadi Harry

57 58 59 60 61

Dwiriani Dwimurti Nurlaili Vega Fitria M. S Ishana Pramawidhana Nila Sari

PJT II PJT II PJT II PJT II PJT II



DPU DKI DPU DKI DPU DKI DPU DKI DPU DKI

 











 

 

DPU DKI

  











1 ‐ 2

Appendix B.1 : Attendance of the Participants in Training 6 Ci Training

No.

Name

Institution




Ribasim

Java Spatial Model

Ribasim series II & Field Trip

Water Zooning

Teknik Zoonasi

Java Spatial Model 2.2

Hymos ‐ Calibration

Riview POLA

Java Spatial Model 2.2 (review concept and exercise)

Water Demand

Ribasim

USLE erosion model

Peak Flow Model

Rencana 6 Ci

Teknik Analisis dampak Zonasi berbasis SDA dengan model JSM

1a

1b

1c

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Jakarta

Bandung

Jakarta

Bogor

Jakarta

Anyer

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

Jakarta

19‐21 May 2010

24‐27 May 2010

31 May‐3 June 2010

25‐28 October 2010

1‐2 November 2010

16‐19 March 2011

16 June 2011

6 July 2011

2 August 2011

5‐6 October 2011

21‐22 October 2011

21 December 2011

9 February 2012

28‐29 February 2012

7‐8 June 2012

11‐13 June 2012

12‐15 June 2012

26 June 2012

  























West Java 62 63 64 65 66 67

Dedi Priadi Ahmad Taufik Bambang Imanuddin Bambang Sumantri Bagja Arya Wijaksana Arief Kautsar

Balai PSDA WS Ciliwung ‐ Cisadane Balai Data & Informasi PSDA Prov. Jawa Barat Dinas PSDA Prov. Jawa Barat Dinas PSDA Prov. Jawa Barat Diskimrum Jabar Dinas SDA Prov. Banten



  









DGTR 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75

Krisnanto Tito Maharta K. Fransisca Weni Tyas Ludfie Royger Simanjuntak Pilas Agita Bambang Sugeng Dody Tri

76 77 78 79

Pandi P. Nurzaman Nina Marlena Frieda A. Deny Ramadhani

  

Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang Dit. Jen. Penataan Umum Tata Ruang

     

 

BAPPENAS 

Bappenas Bappenas Bappenas Bappenas

 

 

 

Bappeda Province 80 Cipta



Bappeda Prov. DKI

Bappeda Regency 81 82 83 84 85 86

K. Septyo Pramudito Endra N. Darianto S. Hilmi Hudaya Ajat R. Jatnika Gantria Ardiputri P.



Bappeda Kab. Bogor Bappeda Kab. Bogor Bappeda Kab. Pandeglang Bappeda Kab. Pandeglang Dinas Tata Ruang Kab. Bogor Dinas Tata Ruang Kab. Bogor

   

 

Roads Development Centre 87 Greece M. 88 Dini H.

 

Pusjatan Pusjatan

Other Consultant & NGO 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99



M. Fadhil Imansyah Bambang Dwi Ahmad Effendi Djoko Pranowo Engene Kim Joowimo Noh Sangjin Lee J. Sinarko Wibowo Fuad A. I. Piva Bell Nuri Yulianti

Consultant Package D Consultant Package E Consultant JWRSS Consultant WTC Websolus co. ltd K‐Water Korea K‐Water Korea MLD DRP Mercy Corp Mercy Corp

  





      



  

attendance

2 ‐ 2


Annex C Published Report up to September 2012 DHV, Deltares, MLD

Annex C – Published report up to September 2012


Annex C for Quarterly Progress Report 10 (September 2012) PUBLISHED REPORT UP TO SEPTEMBER 2012 A. Status Report DOCUMENT NAME Inception Report

PERIOD

ABSTRACT

April 2010

Overview of Activities to be implemented, Issues and proposed solutions

1st Quarterly Report

Nov 2009 - Apr 2010

Presents the status (30 April 2010) and progress achieved during the first three months of project implementation.

2nd Quarterly Report

May 2010 - Jul 2010

Presents the status per 31 July 2010 and progress achieved during the second three months of project implementation

1st Semi-Annual Report

June 2010

Overview of activities implemented during the first semester

3rd Quarterly Report

Aug 2010 - Oct 2010

Presents the status per 31 October 2010 and progress achieved during the third three months of project implementation

4th Quarterly Report

Nov 2010 - Jan 2011

Presents the status on 31 January 2011 and progress achieved during the last three months of first year project implementation, and also presents an indication of developments and issues affecting implementation

2nd Semi-Annual Report

January 2011

Overview of activities implemented during the second semester


Feb 2011 - Apr 2011

Presents the status per 30 April 2011 and progress achieved during the first three months of the second year project implementation


May 2011 - Jul 2011

Presents the status per 31 July 2011 and progress achieved during the second three months of the second year project implementation


Aug 2011 - Oct 2011

Presents the status per 31 October 2011 and progress achieved during the third three months of the second year project implementation


Nov 2011 - February 2012

Presents the status per 29 February 2011 and progress achieved during the third three months of the second year project implementation


Feb 2012 – April 2012

Presents the status per 31 April 2012 and progress achieved during the third three months of the second year project implementation

DHV, Deltares, MLD



B. Institutional Strengthening and Planning (TA B1) DOCUMENT NAME

DATE

ABSTRACT

Review of Standard Operation Procedure for the Citarum Reservoirs

Jul-10

This report provides a review of the Standard Operation Procedure for the Citarum Reservoirs Saguling, Cirata and Djuanda (Jatilihur)

6 Cis Website Concept

Nov-10

Report for MIS analysis and design in developing a project website

Study on effect of land use changes on hydrological characteristics of watersheds

April 12

Study with PusAir. Report showing analysis of recorded flows over time in relation with recorded land uses in some rivers in the 6 Cis area

Stakeholder Analysis

Dec-10

Present the updated stakeholder analysis:

TECHNICAL REPORTS

‐

1C (Citarum)

‐

2C (Cisadane-Ciliwung) and 3C (Ciujung-CidanauCidurian)

Public Consultation Meeting (PCM): Oct-10

Documentation from the 1st Public Consultation Meeting in Citarum

Sep-10

Documentation from the 1st Public Consultation Meeting in Cisadane-Ciliwung

Sep-10

Documentation from the 1st Public Consultation Meeting in Ciujung-Cidanau-Cidurian

May-11

Documentation from the 2nd Public Consultation Meeting in Citarum

May-11

Documentation from the 2nd Public Consultation Meeting in Cisadane-Ciliwung

May-11

Documentation from the 2nd Public Consultation Meeting in Ciujung-Cidanau-Cidurian

Draft Rancangan Pola PSDA 6 Ci

Oct-11

Strategic Management Plan of Water Resources in the 6 Cis river basin territory (Indonesian version)

Executive summary of Draft Pola 6 Ci

Oct-11

Executive summary of the Strategic Management Plan for Water Resources Management in the 6 Cis river basin territory (English version)

- Proceeding PCM-1

- Proceeding PCM-2

DHV, Deltares, MLD



C. Spatial Planning for The 6 CIs River Basin Territory (TA B2) DOCUMENT NAME

DATE

ABSTRACT

Documentation of Methodology for spatial projections: JSM 2.1

Aug-10

Describes the methodology of the Java Spatial Model version 2.1

JSM Explorer 2.1.0 User Manual

Aug-10

Describes the user interface JSM explorer of the Java Spatial Model version 2.1

Interim Report

Dec-10

Present the work done in subcomponent B2 per December 2010 with spatial plan output base on JSM

Draft Final Report B.2 Strategic Spatial Planning

Oct-11

Describes the work done in subcomponent B2 and the inputs delivered to subcomponent B1B for the RENCANA development

Thematic maps of soil erodability in 6 Cis River Basin Territory

Dec-10

Study with IPB. Report on methodology and maps showing results of analysis on soil erodability based on the USLE method

Final Report B.2 Strategic Spatial Planning

May-12

Final version of above draft report

‐ Appendix 1 - Spatial Plan Maps

Oct-11 /May-12

Present collection of available relevant spatial plans for the 6 Cis

‐ Appendix 2 - Biodiversity Data Collection

Oct-11/ May-12

Present the areas of importance for biodiversity in the 6 Cis

‐ Appendix 3 - Upper Citarum Erosion and Sedimentation

Oct-11/ May-12

Present the methodology to simulate the peak flow response (sensitivity) of catchments to changes in land-use using a GIS based approach

‐ Appendix 4 - Modeling for Peak Runoff Zoning

Oct-11/ May-12

Present the methodology concept, input of rainfall to the modeling, and the implementation of the model using ArcGIS 9.3 with Spatial Analyst

Sep 2012

Present the follow-up to the subcomponent B2 “Spatial Planning in 6Ci’s River Basin territory” an extension has been formulated

Appendices for Final Report:

Draft Final Report Extension B2 Strategic Spatial Planning

DHV, Deltares, MLD



D. Development of Key Policies and Strategies for Water Resources Management in CRB (TA B3) DOCUMENT NAME Background Report No. 1 Review of Legal Framework for Groundwater Management Bandung and Water Allocation for Jatiluhur Background Report No. 2 International Best Practise in Water Allocation Background Report No. 3 Water Allocation Practices and Water Balance Jatiluhur

DATE May-10

ABSTRACT Review legislation related to groundwater management in Bandung, surface water allocation Jatiluhur irrigation. Focus on UU 7/2004 and PP 43/2008, licensing, registration, water pricing, and entitlements.

Jun-10

Presents the status (30 April 2010) and progress achieved during the first three months of project implementation. An analysis of the water allocation and distribution in the Jatiluhur irrigation, and a review of a water balance study from the Jatiluhur Irrigation Management Improvement Project Report, March 2010.

Background Report No. 4 Groundwater Issues in the Bandung Plain Background Report No. 5 Groundwater Management in the Bandung Basin

Aug-10

Background Report No. 6 ESDM Workshop on Groundwater Management

Nov-10

Background Report No. 7 Gender Equity and Opportunities in Irrigation

Jan-11

Background Report No. 8 Provincial Groundwater Regulations for the Bandung Area

Dec-10

Background Report No. 9 Groundwater Planning in Upper Citarum Background Report No. 10 BBWSC Workshop on Strategies Water Allocation

Dec-10

Draft Main Report No. 11 Strategic and Practice in Groundwater Management for the Bandung – Soreang Ground water basin Draft Main Report No. 12 Strategies and Practices in Surface Water Allocation and Distribution in the Lower Citarum River Basin

Jun-11

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Oct-10

Sep-10

Feb-10

Jun-11

Assessment groundwater situation in the BandungSoreang groundwater basin (issues, data, on-going activities. Outlines the situation and key issues on groundwater management, the responsible agencies for management, finances and taxation, institutional issues, groundwater management plan, management capacity. Documentation from the ESDM Workshop in the Bandung-Soreang Basin that were discussing all possible steps to limit groundwater use, and conclude on what action could be taken in the near future. Outlines to identify the opportunity to support gender equity requirements in planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation related to water provisions, divisions, utilizations, and allocation of water for irrigation. This second report No. 1 outlines and comments the regulations on ground water management of the West Java Province with the goal to examine if the provincial legal framework is suitable for the implementation of new policy views on sustainable groundwater management in the Bandung area. The report is the deteriorating groundwater situation in the Bandung Plain in the Upper Citarum basin. Documentation from BBWSC the workshop to discuss all possible steps to improve surface water allocation in the Jatiluhur System, and conclude on what action could be taken in the near future. This report is about policies and strategies for improved groundwater management in the Bandung-Soreang Basin. Nine challenges are addressed. This report is about policies and strategies for improved management in the Citarum Basin, especially through better allocation of surface water resources.


Annex D Trends in Rainfall for 3 long‐term recording rainfall stations

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Annex D: Trends in Rainfall for 3 long‐term recording rainfall stations

th

10 Quarterly Report September 2012

Annex D: Trends in Rainfall for 3 long-term recording rainfall stations Original by Jos Dijkman, 24 April, 2012, edited by Dina Saptiarini and Aart van Nes

1) Introduction For the period 1951-1979 the BTA155 project established a database with rainfall data for the project area. The quality of this dataset is high. Many stations could be included, so the spatial resolution is high. Furthermore, for the stations that were included in the dataset there were relatively few missing values (time periods for which there were no observations). Despite a massive effort by the 6Ci’s project team it proved impossible to generate a comparable high-quality rainfall record dataset for the period 1980-2010. In that period, many stations have fallen in disrepair, the quality of data processing apparently has deteriorated, and the available data showed many missing values. At the same time, many stakeholders in water management are concerned about effects on climate change on rainfall values. This is all the more underlined by a string of relatively dry years in the early 2000’s, with for example water shortages in the Jatiluhur irrigation system. This chapter (memo) attempts to establish whether or not an effect of climate change on rainfall can be distinguished. 2) Analysis of rainfall stations with long term records in both BTA 155 and 6 Cis Three rainfall recording stations in the project area meet the following conditions: i) Rainfall records are available for both the period studied in BTA155 (1951-1979) as well as the period 1980-2010. ii) The rainfall records are virtually complete (in other words: there is only a small percentage of missing values). These rainfall stations are (Location indicated in Figure 1 of next page): 1 Pamarayan (near Serang, province of Banten) 2 Karawang (in downstream part of Citarum Basin, west of Jakarta) 3 Gunung Mas (in upstream part of Ciliwung Basin, south of Jakarta. The Figures 2-4 on the following pages show for each of these stations: a. The annual total rainfall amount (mm) b. The 5-year moving average rainfall amount, and c. The 15 year moving average rainfall amount.

DHV, Deltares and MLD

1


th


Figure 1: Map of 6 Cis project area, showing locations with long term rainfall records

Figure 2 Annual total rainfall, and five and fifteen year moving average for annual total rainfall at rainfall station Pamarayan.


2


th


Figure 3 Annual total rainfall, and five and fifteen year moving average for annual total rainfall at rainfall station Gunung Mas.

Figure 4. Annual total rainfall, and five and fifteen year moving average for annual total rainfall at rainfall station Karawang.


3

th



3) Comparison with other rainfall stations with long term records The 6 Cis project area has four other stations with long term records, which are also indicated on figure 1: 4. Jatluhur reservoir levels, which are an indication of annual inflows in MCM/year in re;lation to the reservoir capacity curves and in mm/year in relation to the catchment area, and very much related to rainfall. 5. Jakarta BMG rainfall station. 6. Empang rainfall station along the Cisadane river, south west of Jakarta. 7. Bandung kota rainfall station. The five year moving averages of annual rainfall (or annual inflow of Jatiluhur) of these stations are compared to the rainfall data of the three earlier stations, and the results are presented in figure 5. . 8000

Jatiluhur (mm/year) 7000

6000

Empang (mm/year )

Gunung mas (mm/year)

5000

Total Annual Rainfall

4000 Pamarayan (mm/year) 6 Cis project area (mm/year)

3000 Jakarta BMG

2000

Karawang(mm/year)

Bandung(mm/year)

1000

0 1860

1870

1880

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

5 year moving average mean total annual rainfall Karawang

5 year moving average mean total annual rainfall Pamayaran

5 year moving average mean total annual rainfall Gunung Mas

5 year moving average annual rainfall Empang (Cisadane)

5 year moving average annual rainfall Jakarta (BMG)

5 year moving average annual rainfall Bandung (Airport?)

5 year moving average annual inflow Jatiluhur (Mm/yr)

5 year moving average mean total annual rainfall 6 Cis project area

2010

Figure 5 Five year moving average for annual total rainfall at various locations, averaged for the 6Cis project area, as well as the runoff at Jatiluhur dam (source PJT-II).


4


th


4) Conclusions Figures 2 -4 illustrate the high variability of the annual rainfall amounts. From one year to the next, the annual rainfall differs considerably. This is inherent to the natural variability. The figures also show that rainfall in the mountainous area (Gunung Mas) is considerably higher than rainfall amounts in the relatively flat coastal plain (Pamarayan and Karawang). A significant trend in rainfall amounts either upwards or downwards cannot be identified. This also implies that an effect of climate change on rainfall amounts cannot be observed. This is further underlined by Figure 5 that illustrates the rainfall amounts in Jakarta, for which observations started in 1866. This conclusion is in line with the situation in other parts of the world. It is generally accepted that there is an effect of human activities on the climate, but due to the high variability in the rainfall process this cannot be illustrated by rainfall records. World-wide, there is no proof of climate change effects on rainfall amounts. In turn, this conclusion implies that the BTA155 dataset can be applied in the framework of the 6Cis-project: since no climate change can be identified, the period 1951-1979 is representative for the hydrological conditions that exist today.


5


Annex E Plans in Kabupaten Bandung Barat Concerning watershed conservation

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Annex E – Follow Up of Rencana by Team SPOKI in Bandung


ANNEX E: FOLLOW UP OF RENCANA BY TEAM SPOKI IN BANDUNG Aim of SPOKI The Rencana indicates the activities that should be implemented to meet the targets set for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in the three basins of the 6 Cis project area. After formulation of the Rencana the various institutions have to take up the responsibilities and contributions as assigned. As authors of the Rencana, the three BBWS are fully committed to the responsibilities and contributions as indicated. However, many activities identified are responsibilities of other organizations, but are essential to achieve the targets for IWRM as set in the Rencana. The other institutions have only contributed to data collection, while their commitment to the Rencana activities will have been arranged through their participation in Public Consultation Meetings and endorsement by TKPSDA. This commitment needs to be strengthened. In principle the head of the provincial BAPPEDA, as chairman of the TKPSDA, will take care of that. In West Java the provincial government enhanced this role by establishment of the SPOKI team (Synergy in Planning and Optimalization of Cooperation by Institutions or Sinergi Perencanaan dan Optimalisasi Kerjasama Institusi). A similar institution was established in Kabupaten Bandung. At National level, BAPPENAS is taking care of this, and the Road Map Coordination and Monitoring Unit (RCMU) has been established for that. Requirements and budgets available for catchment conservation The importance of this challenging role of RCMU and SPOKI can be illustrated by looking more in detail at what is required and what is done for catchment conservation. The present activities are based on the plans formulated by BPDAS (Forestry) in the Technical Plan for Rehabilitation of Forest and Land (RTkRHL) for the upper catchment of Citarum basin around Bandung, and how the activities are presently implemented. The envisaged activities and estimated budget requirements are indicated in Table E.1. Figure E.1 indicates where the various activities are planned. After this, the plans are compared to the amounts allocated in 2012. Jabon

Lahan kering diluar KH : 26.020 Ha

Penutupan Lahan Existing dalam Arahan Lokasi Proritas Penanganan RHL

Kapulaga Kopi Sorgum

Aren

Kegiatan vegetatif Dalam KH : 23.483 Ha

Dalam Kawasan Hutan Figure E.1, catchment conservation activities identified in the Technical Plan BPDAS. DHV, Deltares, MLD



Table E.1 Overview of Activities and Estimated Budgets in RTkRHL BPDAS. Jumlah Biaya (Rp) Program Kegiatan Volume 1. Rehabilitasi Hutan dan Lahan A. DAS Citarum Bagian Hulu 53,599 Ha 62,228,439,000 Hutan Rakyat (Agroforestry ) 281 Unit 37,548,000,000 Dam Pengendali 2,292 Unit 46,986,000,000 Dam Penahan 75,648 Unit 226,944,000,000 Sumur Resapan* Jumlah Sub Total I 373,706,439,000 B. DAS Citarum Bagian Tengah Hutan Rakyat (Agroforestry ) 13,865 Ha 16,097,406,642 87 Unit 11,666,700,000 Dam Pengendali 1,160 Unit 23,780,000,000 Dam Penahan Jumlah Sub Total II 51,544,106,642 C. DAS Citarum Bagian Hilir 6,207 Ha 7,206,902,856 Hutan Rakyat (Agroforestry ) 51 Unit 6,839,100,000 Dam Pengendali 991 Unit 20,315,500,000 Dam Penahan Jumlah Sub Total III 34,361,502,856 Jumlah Total I 459,612,048,498 S l l b Program Kegiatan Volume Jumlah Biaya (Rp) 2.

3.

Sosial Kelembagaan A. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) B. Pembentukan dan pengembangan Forum DAS C. Pengembangan kelembagaan imbal jasa lingkungan (IJL) D. Pengembangan sekolah lapang konservasi E. Pengembangan desa konservasi Jumlah Total II Monitoring dan Evaluasi A. SPAS B. Sistem Informasi DAS Jumlah Total III

20 4 6 3 15

Desa Paket Paket Paket Desa

3,800,000,000 450,000,000 1,200,000,000 255,000,000 1,200,000,000 6,905,000,000

15 Unit 1 Paket

1,950,000,000 500,000,000 2450000000 468,967,048,498 23448352425 492,415,400,923

Jumlah Total Monev (5 % total biaya) Jumlah Total

Table E.2 Activities and Budgets allocated in Kabupaten Bandung in 2013.

Rencana Pengelolaan di DAS Citarum Hulu Tahun 2013 NO.

KEGIATAN

1

Penanaman Bibit KBR Th 2012

2

Pembuatan KBR

3

Hutan Rakyat

4

Agroforestry

5

Dam Penahan (DPn)

6

Gully Plug (GP)

DHV, Deltares, MLD

VOLUME

KETERANGAN

2.250 Ha Kab. Bandung 30 Unit Kab. Bandung (1.500.000 Btg) 25 Ha DTA Cisondari 1 Unit (Sub DAS Cisangkuy) 5 Unit 10 Unit



As can be seen from Table E.1 the total budget required for sustainable catchment area development as identified by BPDAS for the Citarum catchment is almost Rp. 500 Billion, and the main part is for the upper catchment (Kabupaten Bandung and Bandung Barat). 53,599 ha is identified for planting trees (Hutan Rakyat), with a budget of Rp 62 Billion. The activities presented in Table E.2 are only for one year and for kabupaten Bandung. For re-greening only 2250 ha has been earmarked. If Bandung Barat has a similar target, the annual target is 4,500 ha, and the total target of 53,559 ha will be achieved only after 12 years. However, more telling is the budget allocated: For the last three years the budgets were Rp. 2.25 Billion in 2011 and Rp. 2.14 Billion in 2012 in Kab Bandung. Assuming Bandung Barat has the same budget, it seems that the kabupatens are aiming to have everything ready in 16 years, or too low unit prices are applied. Other themes are much higher on the agenda of the districts. Kabupaten Bandung allocated almost Rp. 15 Billion for agriculture and more than Rp. 7 Billion for flood control in 2011. Anyhow, the solution for sustainable catchment conservation cannot be expected from the efforts done at district level alone. However, the province and national government can also assist. The RCMU has identified the following budgets for conservation (not only re-greening, but also structural measures as dams, and gully plugs, infiltration pits etc.). Table E.3 Overview of budgets from district, province and national government in Kab. Bandung

2010 2011 2012

APBD Kab.Bandung 10 B Rp 16 B RP 19 B RP

APBD Province 30 B RP 20 B RP 137 B RP

APBN (National) Rp. 122 Billion Rp. 240 Billion Rp. 198 Billion

This shows that the province has increased its budget for catchment conservation considerably! This coincided with the more challenging target of 40% green areas set by West Java in the spatial plan for the province. Also the discussions within the framework of the formation of SPOKI may have contributed. Assuming a budget of 19 B Rp also for Bandung Barat, the total budget for 2012 was Rp. 350 Billion, and the total conservation as envisaged by BPDAS for Citarum could be implemented in 2 years. Importance of SPOKI The SPOKI team now has the challenge to make sure that all budgets are used to achieve synergy and sustainable catchment conservation. As is seen frequently the activities are not linked to each other, and follow up is not thoroughly entrenched. The dismal results of re-greening indicate that more has to be done than only planting trees, but the communities in the surroundings have to be motivated that it is also in their interests that the catchment is in better condition to retain soil and water, and that they should not cut the trees. This will require higher budgets than presently envisaged. Our estimates, based on successful re-greening projects at other location indicate that the unit rates should be at least Rp. 5 Million/ha to allow conducive conditions for sustainable management. A very promising solution has been initiated by BUMN Hijau Lestari, a joint venture of Perhutani, PJT II and other companies active in the area. They provide assistance to the farmers to plant trees (fruit trees such as coffee plants, durian, as well as wood production trees) and cultivate these until they bear fruit. Then the farmers will pay back part of their harvest to Hijau Lestari, so that this company can assist other farmers. This has been applied successfully now on 250 ha for more than three years. The cost per ha are high, amounting to Rp. 7.5 Million/ha for three years. But after these three years, the revenues will come in,

DHV, Deltares, MLD



and in the end, if properly executed, this is a viable business. The SPOKI team could have a leading role to advocate this at a wider scale! Moreover, it is assumed that much of the erosion comes from unsustainable agricultural activities. These activities are frequently not on land owned or leased by the cultivators, and the cultivators do not have an incentive to take care of sustainable land use. As indicated in other reports of Package B, the contribution to erosion from these lands can be equal to the contribution from other parts. And there is a big challenge and opportunity to convince the farming community that a healthy condition of the catchment is also in their interest! Therefore, it is essential that SPOKI also coordinates with the agencies for agriculture in the districts (combined with forestry in Kab. Bandung), province and national level. Another challenge lies in synergy between the various agencies involved in water quality and flood management. Water quality management is related to industries, sanitation, urban drainage and solid waste management, as well as to housing (especially for regulations concerning new housing estates. Flood management is not only related to structural matters, but also to catchment conservation as well as regulation of precautions and preparations of existing and new settlements in flood zones.

DHV, Deltares, MLD


Annex F Benchmarking Indicator for “State of the Basin”

DHV, Deltares, MLD


Annex F – Benchmarking Indicators for “State of the Basin”

Proposed Framework for Physical River Basin Performance Benchmarking Prepared by DHV et al. for the 6 Cis Project October 2011 CPA

Objectives

Indicators/ Measures

a. Catchment area

Protection of catchment area

1. Erosion of topsoil 2. Condition of riverbanks 3. Water retention capacity

b. Water quality

Improved water quality/ water quality up to standard

1. Chemical pollution

Monitoring adequate biodiversity

1. Mean Species Abundance (MSA)

a. Water balance

Sufficient water resources available to meet demand

1. Water available for water supply 2. Water available for irrigation

b. Conveyance system

Sufficient water at the right time, right place in right quantity

1. Efficiency

c. Groundwater

Sustainable use of groundwater

1. Groundwater level 2. Zoning of groundwater 3. Composition

a. Floods

Improved protection levels and/ or reduced damages

1. Inundation areas 2. Embankment

b. Landslides

Prevent landslides from forestation and vegetation removal

1. transverse or tension cracks or unusual bulges 2. tilted or bent trees 3. springs, seeps or saturated ground

I. Conservation

c. Biodiversity

II. Water Utilization

III. Water related damage

DHV, Deltares, MLD

1



BSC-Critical Performance Area: Objective: Objective description: Indicator: Background information:

I.a Catchment area/ erosion from land Protection of essential function of catchment area Protect the catchment area by taking measures to prevent erosion I.a.1. Erosion of topsoil Using GIS systems for assessment of potential erosion based on : 1. Vulnerability for erosion, as assessed by IPB using the Unified Soil and Land Equation (USLE). This can be obtained from IPB or the relevant 6 Cis project Documents; Identified classes:  High vulnerability erosion > 300 TN/ha/year  Medium vulnerability erosion 150 – 300 TN/ha/year  Low vulnerability erosion < 150 TN/ha/y According to USLE vulnerability depends on  soil type

  

Indicator values [1] Highly critical and critical catchment in large part of area (> 30%) A + b + c + d: which parts of total area have high vulnerability for erosion based on IPB classification using USLE, C + d: which parts have protection: slopes >30% are under forest or agro-forest, slopes < 30% have base soil crops [2] High critical and critical catchment in > 20% of area (but less than 30% of area) and medium critical and potential critical > 20%

a) b)

a) b) c)

[4] Developments evaluated against effect on erosion vulnerability

DHV, Deltares, MLD

2.

Present Land Use based on Landsat or updated ALOS Pulsar information and verified in the field for classes:  forest  tree crops  good cover crops  poor cover crops  barren soil  urban area/ hard surface

3.

Present management verified in field for:  forest cover or agro-forest cover for areas with slope > 30%  base soil protection for areas with slope < 30% but still highly vulnerable for erosion

How to evaluate a) area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y for > 40% of total area b) area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y between 30 and 40% and no protection c) area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y between 30 and 40% and slope protection or barren soil protection < 25% of total area d) area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y between 30 and 40% and slope protection and barren soil protection > 25% of total area

c) [3] Highly critical and critical catchment Most soils protected

slope land use management

a)

area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y > 20 and <30 % area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y and slope protection or barren soil protection < 50 % area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y and slope protection or barren soil protection > 50 % area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y >10 and <20 % area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y and slope protection or barren soil protection < 75 % area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y and slope protection or barren soil protection > 75 % area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y < 10%

b)

area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y and slope protection or barren soil protection < 100 %

c)

area vulnerability for erosion > 300 TN/ha/y and slope protection or barren soil protection = 100 %

2




Indicator values [1] No protection

[2] Most (> 50%) vulnerable riverbanks protected (high flow and curves) [3] All riverbanks protected [4] All developments related to riverbanks evaluated against effect on erosion vulnerability

DHV, Deltares, MLD

I.a. Catchment area / erosion from riverbanks Protection of essential function of catchment area Protect the catchment area by taking measures to prevent erosion I.a.2. Condition of riverbanks Important factors:  Control of river width and adjustments of the fluvial system, threatened by encroachment  Bank erosion can make a significant contribution to the river’s sediment load  Destruction of flood plain land and a reduction in the resource value of the river is associated with serious bank erosion Evaluation is based on assessment of: 1. If no protection: what is encroachment / erosion / sedimentation 2. If protection of most vulnerable parts of the system: what is done for protection 3. If protection of all parts of the system: what is done for protection, and 4. What is done to evaluate potential developments How to evaluate a. Encroachment along river channels and banks and/or heavy erosion and sedimentation in > 70% of total length b. Encroachment / erosion / sedimentation in 50 – 70% c. Encroachment /erosion / sedimentation in 25-50 % d. There is only limited encroachment/erosion/sedimentation <25% a) No protection but maintained b) Protection but not maintained c) Protection and maintained a) No protection but maintained b) Protection but not maintained c) Protection and maintained a) No evaluation of developments b) Limited evaluation of developments (25%) c) Good evaluation of developments (50%) d) Excellent evaluation of developments (100%)

3




I.a. Catchment area/ water retention Protection of essential function of catchment area Protect the catchment area by taking measures to prevent erosion I.a.3. Water retention capacity Important factors related to Water retention: 1. Qmax /Qmin  Qmax= progressing average of 5 years Qmin = progressing average of 5 years If Qmax /Qmin is at minimum, that indicates optimal management to retain water. 2. Sensitivity for loss of infiltration and retention capacity leading to increased runoff and flood peaks, and reduced flow in dry season. It is assumed, that this sensitivity is significant only for area with slope >18%. This should be addressed by the policy ∆ Q = 0  new urban development with increased hard surface or diminishing storage capacity will increase runoff, and are obliged to take additional measures to neutralize that 3. Sensitivity for rainfall, land use and hydrogeology is not considered here

Sensitivity as given below means area with slope > 18% How to evaluate a) % of area with sensitivity > 60% b) % of area with sensitivity between 50 - 60% c) % of area with sensitivity between 40 - 50% d) % of area with sensitivity < 40% [2] Qmax/ Qmin > 70 for less than 40% of area and a) % of area with sensitivity > 60% b) % of area with sensitivity between 40 - 60% 50 < Qmax/ Qmin < 70 for c) % of area with sensitivity between 30 - 40% d) % of area with sensitivity < 30% [3] ] Qmax/ Qmin > 70 for less than 30% of area and a) % of area with sensitivity > 60% 50 < Qmax/ Qmin < 70 for less than 30% and b) % of area with sensitivity between 40 - 60% c) % of area with sensitivity between 20 - 40% 30 < Qmax/ Qmin < 50 for d) % of area with sensitivity between 0 - 20% [4] ] Qmax/ Qmin > 70 for less than 20% of area and a. % of area with sensitivity > 60% b. % of area with sensitivity between 40 - 60% 50 < Qmax/ Qmin < 70 for less than 20% and 30 < Qmax/ Qmin < 50 for less than 20% and c. % of area with sensitivity between 20 - 40% Qmax/ Qmin < 30 for d. % of area with sensitivity between 0 - 20% Indicator values [1] Qmax/ Qmin > 70 for

DHV, Deltares, MLD

4




I.b. Water quality/ chemical compound Improved water quality/ water quality up to standard The quality of the supplied water can be used by all of the consuming parties I.b.1. Chemical pollution Criteria of water and the usage (Gov Regulation o 82/2001) Class Intention of use - First Class Drinking water or any other use with the similar requirements - Second Class Service water, recreational, gardening or any other use with with the similar requirements - Third Class Fresh water agricultural, farming and other use with the similar requirements - Fourth Class Irrigation and any other use with the similar requirements Water quality- related problems: Measuring; BOD, COD, TSS, e-coli and heavy metals

Indicator values [1] No measurements

[2] Point source identified and monitored

[3] Point source identified, monitored and evaluated in [4] Point source identified and monitored and action taken

DHV, Deltares, MLD

- Monitor of river condition - Monitor of waste water discharge at master polluters (% of total industries and households) How to evaluate a) No measurements b) In stream measurements  class IV c) In stream measurements  class III d) In stream measurements  class I en II a) < 20% of point sources b) < 50% of point sources c) < 70% of point sources d) > 70% of point sources a) < 50% of cases, and limits exceeded in > 20% of point sources b) < 50% of cases, and limits exceeded in < 20% of point sources c) < 70% of cases, and limits exceeded in > 20% of point sources d) > 70% of cases, and limits exceeded in < 20% of point sources a) Minimise of uses and loses of water quality- related problems b) Minimise of uses of water quality- related problems, loses and on site water treatment c) Minimise of uses, loses of water quality- related problems, on site water treatment and sewer-system connected to treatment plants d) Minimise of uses and losses of water quality- related problems, on site water treatment, sewer-system connected to treatment plants and law enforcement simplify

5




I.b. Water quality/ biodiversity Improved water quality/ water quality up to standard The quality of the supplied water can be used by all of the consuming parties I.b.2. Biodiversity Water quality refers to the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of a water body. These characteristics determine how and for what water can be used and the species and ecosystem process it can support. Ecosystems that have more plant species tend to have a greater capacity to remove pollutants from soil and water than do ecosystems that have fewer species. The relative Mean Species Abundance of originally occurring species (MSA) is an indicator describing biodiversity changes with reference to the original state of ecosystems. It is defined as the average abundances of originally occurring species relative to their abundance in the original, pristine or mature state as the basis. As such it is an indicator of biodiversity intactness, and also describes the process of homogenisation. MSAtot = ∑ MSAx x Ax GLOBIO3 model contains of the next main factors: (MSA = mean species abundance) - pristine habitant has MSA factor of 1 - lightly used habitat 0.7 - secondary vegetation 0.5 - plantation 0.2 - agricultural land 0.1 - settlements 0.05

Indicator values [1] MSA < 0.2 and decreasing

[2] MSA < 0.4

[3] MSA < 0.6

[4] MSA > 0.6

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Requirements of inventory and mapping of existing pockets of high biodiversity: - Areas included in the protected area system managed by the Ministry of Forestry - Important Bird Areas as recognised by BirdLife International - Important wetland sites, as recognised by Wetlands International – Indonesia Programme How to evaluate a. % of the area is settlement >90 % b. % of the area is settlement 70 - 90 % c. % of the area is settlement 30 - 70 % d. % of the area is cultivated > 70% a. No conservation b. Identifying of secondary vegetation c. Protected area within secondary vegetation d. Secondary vegetation is protected a. No regulations after deforestation b. Identifying of secondary vegetation c. Protected secondary vegetation area d. Secondary vegetation is protected and is accounted to be boundary for high Value a. No conservation of existing pristine habitats b. Identifying High Conservation pristine habitats c. Protected area within forest management units d. Forest protection with pristine forested habitats consists > 60%

6




Indicator values [1] Livelihoods of basin population cause for increasing concern

[2] Water- related livelihood issues remain a concern for sections of basin population

[3] Basin on track to meet MDG for water supply and sanitation; however, economic activities remain constrained by water supply and treatment problems [4] Basin livelihoods improving strongly, socioeconomic conditions such that environmental protection recognized as critical objective in basin

DHV, Deltares, MLD

II.a. Water balance Sufficient water resources available to meet demand for: 1. piped water supply 2. irrigation Piped water supply demand is met by available resources II.a.1. Water available for piped water supply Water availability is defined as water availability with 80% reliability because of fluctuations on available average year adequate local storage enhances availability. Urban water supply demands, depends on % of total population that have a piped water system. Livelihood in this context is defined as how much of the population is served by proper water supply and sanitation. How to evaluate - Significant numbers of persons suffer deteriorating service level with respect to water supply, and sanitation (Indicator value = 0.0) - Water supply, sanitation, and not increasing (Indicator value = 1.0) - Overall basin livelihoods improving, with substantial parts of the basin community not served with adequate water and sanitation (indicator value = 1.5) - Overall basin livelihoods improving, with only isolated parts of the basin community not served with adequate water and sanitation meeting MDGs (indictor value = 2.0) - The basin will almost meet MDGs on water supply and sanitation; however, some communities will remain poorly served (indicator value = 2.5) - The basin will meet and possible exceed, MDG on water supply and sanitation, with few areas with substantially improved services (indicator value = 3.0) - All basin communities have effective water and sanitation services; water does no constrain economic activities significantly (indicator value = 3.5) - All basin communities have effective water and sanitation services; water does no constrain economic activities significantly (indicator value = 4.0)

7



BSC-Critical Performance Area: Objective: Specific Objective description: Indicator: Background information:

II.a. Water balance Sufficient water resources available to meet demand Irrigation demand is met by available water resources II.a.2. water available for irrigation Irrigation demand -> CI (Crop Intensity) from Kabupaten. Water balance convey irrigation uses the water needs of the rice crop, based on the cropping pattern as instructed by the Kabupaten/ Kota, and the water availability for a 80 % reliability (exceeded in 4 of 5 years.) Shortage is defined as the difference between water available with 80 % reliability minus crop needs for two weekly periods which is the totalled for the dry season (June – October) and divided by the total crop needs during the dry season. Cropping intensity is the total harvested area (padi savah) on irrigated fields divided by the command area (irrigated area)

Indicator values [1] No development of water resources

[2] Shortages in availability (Mm3/ year) [3] No shortages in water availability over the year only shortages in the dry season period (June until October) [4] Sufficient water for all demands all year

DHV, Deltares, MLD

How to evaluate a. CI<120% b. CI<150% c. CI<150% d. CI<150% a. Shortage of > 20% and CI<180% b. Shortage of < 20% and CI<180% a. Shortage of > 20% (Jul-Oct) and CI<180% b. Shortage of < 20% (Jul-Oct) and CI<180% a. CI>180% b. CI>200% c. CI>220% d. CI>220%

8




II.b. Conveyance system Optimization of the conveyance system Infrastructure and operation is capable to meet all demands II.b.1. efficiency Description of the term conveyance system: Conveyance system is the way that water is transported to the user, it consist of the following: - intake structure - water conducting system - outflow structure There are two types of water conducting system: - open channel flow system - pressure flow system Dry season in Citarum area, the critical period for water supply is from June until October CI = cropping intensity

Indicator values [1] No conveyance system or no operation

[2] Conveyance system and operation developed [3] Conveyance system sufficient utilized (meet demand) [4] Conveyance system optimally utilized to meet demand

How to evaluate a. No conveyance system b. Conveyance system, but no measurements and adequately supply for <25% of days in the dry season c. Conveyance system + measurements, but adequately supply for <25% of days in the dry season d. Conveyance system + measurements and supply for >25% of days) in the dry season a. Measurements + supply > 25% < 50% b. No measurements + supply > 50% c. Measurements + supply > 50% d. No measurements + supply > 75% a. Measurements + supply > 75% b. Measurements + supply > 75% but not in critical period c. Measurements + supply > 75% also in critical period d. Supply > 90 % but not in critical period a. Supply > 90 % also in critical period b. Supply > 90 % also in critical period + CI > 180% c. Supply > 90 % also in critical period + CI > 200% d. Supply > 90 % also in critical period + CI > 220%

Klarifikasi by pak Aart !!!

DHV, Deltares, MLD

9




II.c. Groundwater Sustainable use of groundwater The use of groundwater has no negative effects on the existing groundwater table II.c.1 Groundwater level Description of the term groundwater: Water that occurs below the surface and is brought to the surface by wells. Subsidence can occur when too much water is extracted from underground supplies, deflating the space below the abovesurface, and thus causing the ground to actually collapse. Shallow groundwater (< 20 60 m deep) ~ Deep groundwater (>20 60 m deep)

Indicator values (deep groundwater) [1] Draw down of GW table, land subsidence, poor quality of GW (only shallow GW) [2] No draw down of GW table, land subsidence, poor quality of GW (only shallow GW) [3] No draw down of GW table, no land subsidence, poor quality of GW (only shallow GW) [4] No problems with GW use Usulan: [1] Jalan menjadi bergelombang [2] Daerah menjadi genangan air [3] Bangunan menjadi retak-retak [4] Pipa sumur menjadi menggantung

How to evaluate No comments and ask to Dinas ESDM/Direktorat Geologi/Pfrf. Lambok/Dr. Agus

Menetapkan referensi posisi acuan kedudukan muka tanah. Kemudian menggunakan data yang bersifat time series (kontinu dlm rentang waktu tertentu) maka akan didapatkan selisih yg berupa besaran nilai uplift atau downlift (naik/turun) termasuk vektor arah pergeserannya utk tiap titik acuan tersebut. Apabila hasilnya terjadi penurunan berikut ini yang perlu dievaluasi : 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Pengambilan air tanah (yang berlebihan), Penurunan karena beban bangunan, Konsolidasi alamiah lapisan tanah, Gaya-gaya tektonik, Ekstraksi gas dan minyak bumi, Penambangan bawah tanah, Ekstraksi lumpur, Patahan kerak bumi,

10




II.c. Groundwater Sustainable use of groundwater The use of groundwater has no negative effects on the existing groundwater table II.c.2. Zoning of groundwater Zoning of groundwater: The function of zoning of groundwater, is an important basis for water resources management and protection.

Indicator values (deep groundwater) [1] No zoning, draw down of GW table, land subsidence, GW abstraction uncontrolled [2] Zoning, controlled GW abstraction, still drawdown/ land subsidence [3] Zoning, controlled GW abstraction, no drawdown/ still land subsidence (reduces) [4] Zoning, controlled GW abstraction, no drawdown or subsidence Usulan: [1] Zona Aman


[2] Zona rawan

a) Penurunan kualitas air tanah yang ditandai dengan kenaikan zat padat terlarut antara 1.000 – 10.000 mg/ l atau DHL < 1.000 – 1.500 S/cm; b) Penurunan muka air tanah 40% - 60 %.

[3] Zona kritis

a) Penurunan kualitas air tanah yang ditandai dengan kenaikan zat padat terlarut antara 10.000 – 100.000 mg/ l atau DHL < 1.500 – 5.000 S/cm; b) Penurunan muka air tanah > 60% - 80 %.

[4] Zona rusak

a) Penurunan kualitas air tanah yang ditandai dengan kenaikan zat padat terlarut lebih dari 100.000 mg/ l atau tercemar oleh logam berat dan atau bahan berbahaya dan beracun dan atau DHL > 5.000 S/cm; b) Penurunan muka air tanah lebih dari 80 %.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

a) Penurunan kualitas air tanah yang ditandai dengan kenaikan zat padat terlarut kurang dari 1.000 mg/ l atau DHL < 1.000 S/cm; b) Penurunan muka air tanah kurang dari 40%.

11




II.c. Groundwater Sustainable use of groundwater The use of groundwater has no negative effects on the existing groundwater table II.c.3. Composition Seawater intrusion can occur in coastal areas, a lowered water table may induce sea water to reserve the flow toward the land. Alternatively, salt from mineral beds may leach into the groundwater of its own accord. Further the following consequences by excessive groundwater use: - Acidification - Excess nutrients - Desiccation

Indicator values (shallow & deep GW) [1] Insufficient or poor quality of water


[2] Only period insufficient and poor quality of water [3] Only period insufficient and good quality of water [4] Sufficient and good quality of water

Bertambahnya sumur penduduk yang berubah menjadi payau. intrusi air laut ini menimbulkan dampak yang sangat luas terhadap berbagai aspek kehidupan, seperti gangguan kesehatan, penurunan kesuburan tanah, kerusakan bangunan dan lain sebagainya

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Pengambilan sampel air tanah dangkal pada akuifer bebas dan air tanah dalam pada akuifer tertekan yang selanjutnya dilakukan pengukuran DHL terhadap air sampel tersebut : Klasifikasi keasinan air tanah : Sifat Air Daya Hantar Listrik(μS/cm/cm) Air Tawar <1.500 Air Agak payau 1.500-5.000 Air Payau 5.000-15.000 Air Asin 15.000-50.000 Brine (connate) >50.000

Kadar Khlorida(mg/lt) <500 500-2.000 2.000-5.000 5.000-19.000 >19.000

12



BSC-Critical Performance Area: Objective: Objective description: Indicator: Background information

III.a. Floods Improved protection levels and/ or reduced damages Taking measures to protect against flooding and reducing flood damage III.a.1. Inundation areas Inundated area:  Size (ha)  Depth (m)  Duration (t)  Damage (IDR)  Casualties Indicators for easy detection are Size + Damage

Indicator values [1] Inundated area > 10%; total annual damages > 500.000 IDR/ capita

[2] Inundated area > 10%, with controlled flooding area damages < 500.000 IDR/ capita

[3] Inundated area 5% < A < 10%, and/or controlled flooding damages < 500.000 IDR/ capita

[4] Inundated area < 5%, damages < 250.000 IDR/ capita

How to evaluate a) No early warning, no protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water b) Early warning or protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water c) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water d) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, clean flood water ??????? diganti sampah !! a) No early warning, no protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water b) Early warning or protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water c) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water d) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, clean flood water ??????? diganti sampah !! a) No early warning, no protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water b) Early warning or protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water c) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water d) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, clean flood water ??????? diganti sampah !! a) No early warning, no protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water b) Early warning or protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water c) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, dirty flood water d) Early warning and protection of vulnerable area, clean flood water ??????? diganti sampah !! e)

10% ? dari apa ini ?????

DHV, Deltares, MLD

13



BSC-Critical Performance Area: Objective: Objective description: Indicator: Background information

Indicator values [1] Inundated area > 10% or damages > 500.000 IDR/ capita no protection of vulnerable area [2] < 10% of vulnerable area protected and inundation area > 5% or damage < 250.000 IDR/ capita [3] > 10% of area protected /inundation area < 5% [4] > 20% of area protected /inundation area < 5%

DHV, Deltares, MLD

III.a. Floods Improved protection levels and/ or reduced damages Taking measures to protect against flooding and reducing flood damage III.a.2. percentage of embankment The purpose of embankments is to constrain and direct the passage of floodwater along a river valley or water course. The length of the embankment is important for overtop safely, provided the flow is spread evenly over a long length (a spillway) How to evaluate a) No local storage or pumps b) Pumps c) Local storage d) Sufficient local storage + pumps a) No local storage or pumps b) Pumps c) Local storage d) Sufficient local storage + pumps a) No local storage or pumps e) Pumps f) Local storage g) Sufficient local storage + pumps a) No local storage or pumps f) Pumps g) Local storage h) Sufficient local storage + pumps

14




III.b. Landslides Prevent landslides from forestation and vegetation removal Controlled logging of forest and/ or take measurements to prevent landslides III.b.1. transverse or tension cracks or unusual bulges The term landslide describes downhill of a mass of rock, earth or debris movements that can move slowly and cause damage gradually, or move rapidly, destroying property and taking lives suddenly and unexpectedly. Landslides are generally induced when the shear stress on the slope material exceeds the material’s shear strength. The occurrence and reactivation of landslides is conditioned by a number of terrain and geo-environmental factors related to bedrock and soil properties, weathering conditions, jointing and structure, slope morphology, land cover/use, surface and ground water flow, etc.

Indicator values [1] No regulations on deforestation or removal of vegetation, cultivation on slopes and measurement to prevent landslides. [2] No deforestation or cultivation on slopes >30% without taking measurements to prevent landslides [3] Controlled deforestation or cultivation on slopes with measurements taken to prevent landslides [4] Reforestation of slopes

How to evaluate Passive intervention: - slopes <30% are quite save - prevent deforestation and vegetation removal - avoid weakening the slope Active preventive intervention - reforestation - proper water runoff - drainage - retaining walls - hill slope terracing 1. 2. 3. 4.

Severe landslides Landslides evaluated treat of critical point ……. No landslides

Apa bedanya III.b.1. transverse or tension cracks or unusual bulges, III.b.2. tilted or bent trees dan III.b.3. springs, seeps or saturated ground, KOK sama ?

DHV, Deltares, MLD

15




Indicator values [1] No regulations on deforestation or removal of vegetation, cultivation on slopes and measurement to prevent landslides. [2] No deforestation or cultivation on slopes >30% without taking measurements to prevent landslides [3] Controlled deforestation or cultivation on slopes with measurements taken to prevent landslides [4] Reforestation of slopes

DHV, Deltares, MLD

III.b. Landslides Prevent landslides from forestation and vegetation removal Controlled logging of forest and/ or take measurements to prevent landslides III.b.2. tilted or bent trees

How to evaluate Passive intervention: - slopes <30% are quite save - prevent deforestation and vegetation removal - avoid weakening the slope Active preventive intervention - reforestation - proper water runoff - drainage - retaining walls - hill slope terracing

16



BSC-Critical Performance Area: Objective: Objective description: Indicator: Background information: Indicator values

III.b. Landslides Prevent landslides from forestation and vegetation removal Controlled logging of forest and/ or take measurements to prevent landslides III.b.3. springs, seeps or saturated ground How to evaluate No comments and ask to Dinas ESDM/Direktorat Geologi/Prof Lambok/Dr. Agus

INDIKATOR TANAH LONGSOR : * Munculnya retakan-retakan di lereng yang sejajar dengan arah tebing. * Biasanya terjadi setelah hujan. * Munculnya mata air baru secara tiba-tiba. * Tebing rapuh dan kerikil mulai berjatuhan. PENYEBAB TERJADINYA TANAH LONGSOR YANG PERLU DIEVALUASI : 1. Hujan Ancaman tanah longsor biasanya dimulai pada bulan November karena meningkatnya intensitas curah hujan. Musim kering yang panjang akan menyebabkan terjadinya penguapan air di permukaan tanah dalam jumlah besar. Hal itu mengakibatkan munculnya pori-pori atau rongga tanah hingga terjadi retakan dan merekahnya tanah permukaan. Ketika hujan, air akan menyusup ke bagian yang retak sehingga tanah dengan cepat mengembang kembali. Pada awal musim hujan, intensitas hujan yang tinggi biasanya sering terjadi, sehingga kandungan air pada tanah menjadi jenuh dalam waktu singkat. Hujan lebat pada awal musim dapat menimbulkan longsor, karena melalui tanah yang merekah air akan masuk dan terakumulasi di bagian dasar lereng, sehingga menimbulkan gerakan lateral. Bila ada pepohonan di permukaannya, tanah longsor dapat dicegah karena air akan diserap oleh tumbuhan. Akar tumbuhan juga akan berfungsi mengikat tanah. 2. Lereng terjal Lereng atau tebing yang terjal akan memperbesar gaya pendorong. Lereng yang terjal terbentuk karena pengikisan air sungai, mata air, air laut, dan angin. Kebanyakan sudut lereng yang menyebabkan longsor adalah 180 apabila ujung lerengnya terjal dan bidang longsorannya mendatar. 3. Tanah yang kurang padat dan tebal Jenis tanah yang kurang padat adalah tanah lempung atau tanah liat dengan ketebalan lebih dari 2,5 m dan sudut lereng lebih dari 220. Tanah jenis ini memiliki potensi untuk terjadinya tanah longsor terutama bila terjadi hujan. Selain itu tanah ini sangat rentan terhadap pergerakan tanah karena menjadi lembek terkena air dan pecah ketika hawa terlalu panas. 4. Batuan yang kurang kuat Batuan endapan gunung api dan batuan sedimen berukuran pasir dan campuran antara kerikil, pasir, dan lempung umumnya kurang kuat. Batuan tersebut akan mudah menjadi tanah bila mengalami proses pelapukan dan umumnya rentan terhadap tanah longsor bila terdapat pada lereng yang terjal. 5. Jenis tata lahan Tanah longsor banyak terjadi di daerah tata lahan persawahan, perladangan, dan adanya genangan air di lereng yang terjal. Pada lahan persawahan akarnya kurang kuat untuk mengikat butir tanah dan membuat tanah menjadi lembek dan jenuh dengan air sehingga mudah terjadi longsor. Sedangkan untuk daerah perladangan penyebabnya adalah karena akar pohonnya tidak dapat menembus bidang longsoran yang dalam dan umumnya terjadi di daerah longsoran lama. 6. Getaran Getaran yang terjadi biasanya diakibatkan oleh gempabumi, ledakan, getaran mesin, dan getaran lalulintas kendaraan. Akibat yang ditimbulkannya adalah tanah, badan jalan, lantai, dan dinding rumah menjadi retak.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

17



7. Susut muka air danau atau bendungan Akibat susutnya muka air yang cepat di danau maka gaya penahan lereng menjadi hilang, dengan sudut kemiringan waduk 220 mudah terjadi longsoran dan penurunan tanah yang biasanya diikuti oleh retakan. 8. Adanya beban tambahan Adanya beban tambahan seperti beban bangunan pada lereng, dan kendaraan akan memperbesar gaya pendorong terjadinya longsor, terutama di sekitar tikungan jalan pada daerah lembah. Akibatnya adalah sering terjadinya penurunan tanah dan retakan yang arahnya ke arah lembah. 9. Pengikisan/erosi Pengikisan banyak dilakukan oleh air sungai ke arah tebing. Selain itu akibat penggundulan hutan di sekitar tikungan sungai, tebing akan menjadi terjal. 10. Adanya material timbunan pada tebing Untuk mengembangkan dan memperluas lahan pemukiman umumnya dilakukan pemotongan tebing dan penimbunan lembah. Tanah timbunan pada lembah tersebut belum terpadatkan sempurna seperti tanah asli yang berada di bawahnya. Sehingga apabila hujan akan terjadi penurunan tanah yang kemudian diikuti dengan retakan tanah. 11. Bekas longsoran lama Longsoran lama umumnya terjadi selama dan setelah terjadi pengendapan material gunung api pada lereng yang relatif terjal atau pada saat atau sesudah terjadi patahan kulit bumi. Bekas longsoran lama memilki ciri: * Adanya tebing terjal yang panjang melengkung membentuk tapal kuda. * Umumnya dijumpai mata air, pepohonan yang relatif tebal karena tanahnya gembur dan subur. * Daerah badan longsor bagian atas umumnya relatif landai. * Dijumpai longsoran kecil terutama pada tebing lembah. * Dijumpai tebing-tebing relatif terjal yang merupakan bekas longsoran kecil pada longsoran lama. * Dijumpai alur lembah dan pada tebingnya dijumpai retakan dan longsoran kecil. * Longsoran lama ini cukup luas. 12. Adanya bidang diskontinuitas (bidang tidak sinambung) Bidang tidak sinambung ini memiliki ciri: * Bidang perlapisan batuan * Bidang kontak antara tanah penutup dengan batuan dasar * Bidang kontak antara batuan yang retak-retak dengan batuan yang kuat. * Bidang kontak antara batuan yang dapat melewatkan air dengan batuan yang tidak melewatkan air (kedap air). * Bidang kontak antara tanah yang lembek dengan tanah yang padat. Bidang-bidang tersebut merupakan bidang lemah dan dapat berfungsi sebagai bidang luncuran tanah longsor. 13. Penggundulan hutan Tanah longsor umumnya banyak terjadi di daerah yang relatif gundul dimana pengikatan air tanah sangat kurang. 14. Daerah pembuangan sampah Penggunaan lapisan tanah yang rendah untuk pembuangan sampah dalam jumlah banyak dapat mengakibatkan tanah longsor apalagi ditambah dengan guyuran hujan, seperti yang terjadi di Tempat Pembuangan Akhir Sampah Leuwigajah di Cimahi. Bencana ini menyebabkan sekitar 120 orang lebih meninggal.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

18


Annex G + H Detailed Monitoring Framework for B.3 DHV, Deltares, MLD

Annex G – Groundwater


Annex G - Work Plan Status 6 Cis B3 (until end of August 2012) Activities

Progress to date

Task B3-1: System Development for Licensing, Registration related to groundwater Bandung Task B3-3: Policy Development for Water Pricing related to groundwater Bandung 1 Review of current gov policies and legislation on groundwater licensing, pricing (price policies, price agreements, cost recovery, tariffs, fee collection); identify ambiguities, overlaps

100%

Review of groundwater legislation/policies completed. Overlaps and ambiquities identified (see Table 4.1). Activity completed.

2 Review of international best practices

100%

Review / Report on best practises completed.

3 Data collection, discussion with DINAS Enery & Mining/BPLHD on (a) (c ) abstraction, (d) licensing, (e) registration, (f) monitoring systems and (g) related problems (law enforcement, participation of the community)

100%

Data collection and evaluation completed. Information was obtained on regulatory, permit procedures; implementation and monitoring capacity. Activity completed.

4 Data collection, discussions with Pusat Lingkungan Geologi on (a) GW (b) monitoring mechanisms and (c) monitoring activities in the CAT Bandung Soreang

100%

Various studies identified and reviewed. Understanding on groundwater basin, aquifers. Problems identified. Activity completed.

5 Identify the current mechanisms and practises on licensing, registration, database, metering, law enforcement

100%

Licensing mechanisms identified. Mechanisms were reviewed. Licenses issued by Prov/District DINAS EPSD (incl extension licenses, monitoring of abstraction through metering and legal action in case of law violation). Activity completed.

6 Carry out economic assessment of level groundwater charges for shifting to surface water

100%

Groundwater pricing analsys completed. Information on fees, charges collected. Costs for groundwater abstraction through individual boreholes (direct costs only) > 3 times cheaper than PDAM water. Activity completed.

7 Analyse feasibility of raising groundwater charges for required level for industry

100%

Included in Task 6. Activity completed.

8 Review reports on alternatives groundwater usage (re-use, re-cycling etc); identify alternatives within the Bandung context (textile industry). Activity in coordination with B1 consultants.

100%

Alternatives were reviewed. Short-term solutions not readily available. Rainfall harvesting looks promising but more study required. Artificial recharge of damaged aquifers does not look promising. Strict licensing, enforcement system needed. High taxes in DKI Jakarta moves out industry that uses groundwater, but in Bandung economy has high reliance on industry. industry Long-term Long term solution is to replace the existing concentrated groundwater withdrawals by reliable/cheap supply of surface water. Review completed.

9 Review River Basin Planning study reports on feasibility for usage of water from lakes, reservoirs or other surface water sources as an alternative to groundwater; Activity in coordination with B1 consultants.

100%

Three most promising alternatives identified. Further study is/will be covered by 1) POLA at strategic level, 2) upcoming ADB project, Tranch II on Bandung Water Supply sources and development, 3) MoU between DG WR, Dinas SDA Prov and 4 Kab/2 Kotas and 4) Joint Working Group (headed by BBWSC). Review completed.

10 Conduct consultations with concerned parties (DINAS EPSDM, PAM, Badan Geologi, Industry); Discuss and obtain support for changes to current pricing, licensing, monitoring systems; Assess willingness to change from groundwater to surface water usage (price, water, reliability/quality delivery)

100%

Consultations with provincial/kab agencies completed. Findings reported in section 4.3.1 and Table 4.1 and in Final Report

11 Identify scope for improvement registration database

50%

Activity is cancelled (see 3rd Qtr report). Follow up was provided to deal with conflicting messages from various assessments on critical areas

12 Provide technical assistance to local Gov on developing registration database

0%

Activity is cancelled (see 3rd Qtr report)

13 Develop recommendations on groundwater licensing, pricing, institutional roles, monitoring activities etc

100%

Final recommendations completed.

14 Discuss recommendations with concerned parties

100%

Discussed during stakeholder consultations and ESDM workshop. Activity completed.

100%

Follow up is provided through Public Policy Specialist, see section 4.3.1. Data from inventories concerning conditions of groundwater have been obtained and compared. A conclusion was reached on the presently critical areas

15 Organize Workshop

100%

ESDM Workshop was held in November 2010. Workshop report completed incl. presentations, discussions and conclusions for follow up.

16 Finalize reports

95%

Draft final distributed among key stakehodlers in June'11. Comments from ADB received, but Dinas ESDM sent comments in October 2011. Final report in September 2012.

14a Discuss recommendations with concerned parties after the workshop

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Annex H – Water Allocation


Annex H - Work Plan Status 6 Cis B3 (until end of August 12) Activities

Progress to date

Task B3-2: Policy Development for Water Allocation related to Irrigation Tarum System 1 Review of current gov policies and legislation; identify ambiguities, overlaps

100%

Review of surface water legislation/policies completed.

2 Identify current practises on water allocation, water distribution and maintenance down to the secondary irrigation scheme levels Tarum canal

100%

Current water allocation mechanisms identified. Key player is PJTII. Allocation is annually (DMI and irrigation) with bi-weekly adjustments for irrigation. Activity completed.

3 Compare water allocation practises Tarum with other schemes with focus on the institutional arrangements

100%

A comparison was made on water allocation between three basins. These are Bengewan-Solo, Brantas and Citarum. Lessons learnt taken into account for strategies. Activity completed.

4 Assess consultation, information and participatory mechanisms (Panitia Irigasi, Rencana Tata Tanam etc )

100%

An analysis of roles of various consultation mechanisms in the allocation process was carried out. Key players are Dinas Kab, Kom Irigasi, Dinas Prov, BBWSC and PJTII. A standard mechanism for water allocation exists at annual and bimonthly periods. Activity completed.

5 Conduct consultations with concerned parties (PJTII, DINAS Prov/Kab WR, members Irrigation Commission, members WUAs, staff from DINAS Agriculture etc); Discuss and obtain support for development of water allocation in identified areas

100%

see Taks 4. Activity completed.


100%

New ideas on improved water distribution were discussed with PU Jakarta J k t and d BBWSC. BBWSC Proposed P d is i a measurable bl benchmark system for primary irrigation off take points. Scope for four MoUs on role sharing in aspects of water distribution is identified. Discussed in final Workshop on Feb'11.


100%

Discussed during Workshop in February 2011.

50%

Follow up is provided by Public Policy Specialist. See 4.3.2. Serial discussion on task distribution and preparation of MoU and Joint operation of Jatiluhur system. Final draft MoU and annexes prepared (see annex I). Finalization planned in July 2012.

8 Prepare report on Pricing Bulk Water Supply

80%

Study started June 2011, workshops were held in June, September, October and November. To be completed in April 2012. See section 4.2.3 and 4.3.3.

9 Organize Workshop

100%

BBWSC Workshop was held on 17 Feb'11. Conclusions, recommendations are included in Report No 10 and Table 4.2

95%

Draft final distributed among key stakehodlers in June'11. Comments from ADB received, but Dinas PSDA sent comments in October 2011. Final report in September 2012.

7a Discuss recommendations with concerned parties about role sharing

10 Finalize reports

DHV, Deltares, MLD


Annex I Role sharing Draft MoU and Annexes DHV, Deltares, MLD


Annex I.1 – Role Sharing Draft MoU

PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA ANTARA BALAI BESAR WILAYAH SUNGAI CITARUM, DINAS PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA AIR PROVINSI JAWA BARAT DAN PERUM JASA TIRTA II TENTANG PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JATILUHUR Nomor: ................................................................................................................... Nomor: ................................................................................................................... Nomor: ...................................................................................................................

Pada hari …. tanggal ….. bulan ….. tahun dua ribu dua belas, yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini : 1. DR. A. HASANUDIN, ME

Kepala Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum yang diangkat berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor : 06/KPTS/M/2011 tanggal 14 januari 2011 tentang PEMBEBASAN DAN PENGANGKATAN PEJABAT PIMPINAN ESELON II DILINGKUNGAN KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM dalam hal ini bertindak untuk dan atas nama Pemerintah Republik Indonesia berkedudukan di Jl. Inspeksi Cidurian No. ST 5600 Bandung, yang selanjutnya disebut sebagai PIHAK KESATU

2. IR. DEDDI MULYADI

Kepala Dinas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Provinsi Jawa Barat berdasarkan Keputusan Gubernur Provinsi Jawa Barat Nomor : 821.2/Kep.181-BKD/2011 TANGGAL 27 januari 2011 tentang ALIH TUGAS/ ALIH JABATAN DILINGKUNGAN PEMERINTAH PROVINSI JAWA BARAT dalam hal ini bertindak untuk dan atas nama Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat beralamat di Jl. Braga No. 137 Bandung, yang selanjutnya disebut sebagai PIHAK KEDUA

3. IR.EDDY A DJAJADIREJA DIPL HE

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Direktur Utama Perum Jasa Tirta II yang diangkat berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor Kep : 240/MBU/2010 tanggal 3 november 2010 tentang PENGANGKATAN DAN PEMBERHENTIAN ANGGOTA DIREKSI PJT II dalam hal ini bertindak untuk dan atas nama Perum Jasa Tirta II beralamat di Jl Lurah Kawi nomor 1 Jatiluhur, Purwakarta, yang selanjutnya disebut sebagai PIHAK KETIGA

page 1 of 11



PIHAK KESATU, PIHAK KEDUA dan PIHAK KETIGA yang secara bersama-sama selanjutnya disebut PARA PIHAK menyepakati untuk mengadakan perikatan dalam bidang pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur yang dituangkan dalam perjanjian kerjasama dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut: Pasal 1 KETENTUAN UMUM

Dalam perjanjian kerjsama ini yang dimaksud dengan: 1. Jaringan Irigasi Jatiluhur adalah jaringan irigasi pada Daerah Irigasi Utara Jatiluhur yang mendapat air dari waduk Ir. H. Juanda. 2. Jaringan irigasi adalah jaringan irigasi yang terdiri dari saluran, bangunan, dan bangunan pelengkapnya yang merupakan satu kesatuan yang diperlukan untuk penyediaan, pembagian, pemberian, penggunaan, dan pembuangan air irigasi dan air baku untuk kebutuhan lain. 3. Jaringan irigasi primer adalah bagian dari jaringan irigasi yang terdiri dari bangunan utama, saluran induk/primer, saluran pembuangannya, bangunan bagi, bangunan bagi-sadap, bangunan sadap, dan bangunan pelengkapnya. 4. Jaringan irigasi sekunder adalah bagian dari jaringan irigasi yang terdiri dari saluran sekunder, saluran pembuangannya, bangunan bagi, bangunan bagi-sadap, bangunan sadap, dan bangunan pelengkapnya. 5. Pengelolaan jaringan irigasi adalah kegiatan yang meliputi operasi, pemeliharaan, dan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi didaerah irigasi 6. Operasi jaringan irigasi adalah upaya pengaturan air irigasi dan air baku untuk kebutuhan lain serta pembuangannya, termasuk kegiatan membuka menutup pintu bangunan irigasi, menyusun rencana tata tanam, menyusun sistem golongan, menyusun rencana pembagian air, melaksanakan kalibrasi pintu/bangunan, mengumpulkan data, memantau, dan mengevaluasi dengan melaksanakan kegiatan perencanaan operasi jaringan irigasi, pelaksanaan operasi jaringan irigasi, monitoring, evaluasi dan pelaporan, penyediaan data pendukung jaringan irigasi. 7. Pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi adalah upaya menjaga dan mengamankan jaringan irigasi agar selalu dapat berfungsi dengan baik guna memperlancar pelaksanaan operasi dan mempertahankan kelestariannya yang terdiri dari pengamanan jaringan irigasi (pencegahan dan pengamanan), pemeliharaan rutin jaringan irigasi (perawatan, perbaikan ringan), pemeliharaan berkala jaringan irigasi (perawatan, perbaikan, dan penggantian) dan penanggulangan/perbaikan darurat ( bersifat segera yang biasanya dengan konstruksi tidak permanen) dengan melaksanakan kegiatan inventarisasi kondisi jaringan irigasi, perencanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi, pelaksanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi dan pemantauan, evaluasi dan pelaporan. 8. Rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi adalah kegiatan perbaikan jaringan irigasi guna mengembalikan fungsi dan pelayanan irigasi seperti semula dengan melaksanakan pra perencanaan, perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pemantauan, evaluasi dan pelaporan. 9. Pemberdayaan masyarakat dan/atau pemilik kepentingan adalah upaya penguatan dan peningkatan kemampuan masyarakat dan/atau pemilik kepentingan yang meliputi aspek kelembagaan, teknis, dan pembiayaan dengan dasar keberpihakan kepada masyarakat/ petani melalui pembentukan, pelatihan, pendampingan dan menumbuh-kembangkan partisipasi. 10. Pembinaan aparat/ petugas adalah upaya menjaga agar aparat/ petugas memiliki kemampuan secara professional dan moral sesuai dengan kebutuhan tugas dan tanggung jawabnya.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 2 of 11



Pasal 2 MAKSUD DAN TUJUAN

(1) Maksud Perjanjian Kerjasama ini adalah untuk memberikan landasan hukum dalam kerjasama pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur. (2) Tujuan perjanjian kerjasama ini adalah: a. Untuk memadukan program dan pelaksanaan kegiatan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur. b. Untuk membangun sinergi dalam pemanfaatan sumber daya manusia, keuangan, material, dan peralatan PARA PIHAK dalam pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur. c.

Untuk meningkatkan kinerja pelayanan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur.

d. Menghindari terjadinya tumpang tindih dan kesenjangan penanganan kegiatan diantara PARA PIHAK dalam pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur.

Pasal 3 PRINSIP – PRINSIP Pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 2 diselenggarakan dengan berlandaskan pada prinsip: a. partisipatif, b. keterpaduan, c.

berwawasan lingkungan hidup,

d. transparan, e. akuntabel, dan f.

berkeadilan Pasal 4 RUANG LINGKUP

Ruang lingkup perjanjian kerjasama sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 2 terdiri atas: a. Pengelolaan jaringan irigasi, b. Koordinasi pengelolaan jaringan irigasi c.

Pembiayaan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi,

d. Pemberdayaan masyarakat dan/atau para pemilik kepentingan, e. Pembinaan aparat/petugas pengelolaan jaringan irigasi, f.

Pengawasan terhadap kerjasama pengelolaan jaringan irigasi.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 3 of 11



Pasal 5 TUGAS DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB

(1) Tugas dan tanggung jawab pengelolaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 diatur sebagai berikut : a. Kegiatan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi primer dan sekunder dilaksanakan oleh PIHAK KESATU b. Kegiatan operasi dan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi primer dan sekunder dilaksanakan oleh PIHAK KEDUA dan PIHAK KETIGA dengan pengaturan : 1. Operasi jaringan irigasi primer dan sekunder dilaksanakan oleh PIHAK KETIGA 2. Pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi primer dilaksanakan oleh PIHAK KETIGA 3. Pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi sekunder dilaksanakan oleh PIHAK KEDUA melalui Tugas Pembantuan Operasi dan Pemeliharaan Irigasi ( TP- OP Irigasi) (2) Dalam hal terdapat kepentingan mendesak untuk merehabilitasi jaringan irigasi dan/ atau kegiatan lain oleh PIHAK KEDUA dan/ atau PIHAK KETIGA , akan tetapi kegiatan dimaksud belum menjadi prioritas nasional, PARA PIHAK dapat melakukan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi melalui kerjasama pembiayaan (3) Didalam melaksanakan ketentuan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) , PARA PIHAK mempunyai tugas dan tanggung jawab sebagai berikut: a. PIHAK KESATU selaku Unit Pelaksana Teknis Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Satuan Kerja Pelaksanaan Jaringan Pemanfaatan Air (Satker PJPA) mempunyai tugas dan tanggung jawab: 1.

Melaksanakan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf a berdasarkan urutan prioritas kebutuhan perbaikan jaringan irigasi yang ditetapkan Pemerintah setelah mempertimbangkan masukan dari Komisi Irigasi yang meliputi: 1) Pra Perencanaan, 2) Perencanaan, 3) Pelaksanaan, 4) Pemantauan, evaluasi dan pelaporan.

2. Melaksanakan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) 3. Menyediakan anggaran dalam dokumen anggaran untuk membiayai kegiatan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf a dan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) 4. Menyediakan sumber daya yang meliputi sumber daya manusia, bahan, dan peralatan, guna memenuhi kebutuhan operasional kegiatan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf a dan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) 5. Melaksanakan pembinaan internal aparat/petugas dilingkungan PIHAK KESATU. 6. Melaksanakan pendidikan dan pelatihan teknis bagi aparat/petugas yang terkait dengan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 4 of 11



7. Melaksanakan pengawasan melekat pada kegiatan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf a dan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) yang menjadi tanggung jawabnya. 8. Melaksanakan pemberdayaan masyarakat dan/atau para pemilik kepentingan. 9. Melaksanakan pemantauan dan evaluasi kegiatan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur. 10. Menindak-lanjuti laporan/pengaduan masyarakat. 11. Mengadakan evaluasi pelaksanaan Perjanjian kerjasama pengelolaan jaringan irigasi jatiluhur. 12. Menyusun laporan pelaksanaan Perjanjian kerjasama pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur. b. PIHAK KEDUA selaku Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat dan Satuan Kerja Tugas Pembantuan Operasi dan Pemeliharaan (TP-OP Irigasi) mempunyai tugas dan tanggung jawab: 1. Melaksanakan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf b butir 3 yang menjadi tanggung jawabnya yang terdiri atas: 1) Inventarisasi kondisi jaringan irigasi 2) Perencanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi 3) Pelaksanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi 4) Pemantauan, evaluasi dan pelaporan 2. Melaksanakan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) 3. Mengkoordinasi kegiatan – kegiatan yang meliputi: 1) Pengelolaan jaringan irigasi, 2) Program dan pembiayaan, 3) Laporan. 4. Menyelenggarakan rapat Komisi Irigasi Provinsi Jawa Barat dalam rangka penyusunan rencana tata tanam. 5. Menyediakan anggaran dalam dokumen anggaran untuk membiayai kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) dan mengelola anggaran TP – OP irigasi untuk membiayai kegiatan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat(1) huruf b butir 3 6. Menyediakan sumber daya yang meliputi sumber daya manusia, bahan, dan peralatan, guna memenuhi kebutuhan operasional kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat(1) huruf b butir 3 dan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2). 7. Melaksanakan pembinaan internal aparat/petugas dilingkungan PIHAK KEDUA. 8. Melaksanakan pengawasan melekat pada kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf b butir 3 dan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) yang menjadi tanggungjawabnya.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 5 of 11



c.

PIHAK KETIGA selaku pemegang mandat Peraturan Pemerintah No. 7 Tahun 2010 tentang Perum Jasa Tirta II mempunyai tugas dan tanggung jawab: 1. Melaksanakan operasi jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf b butir 1 yang mencakup: 1) Perencanaan operasi jaringan irigasi, 2) Pelaksanaan operasi jaringan irigasi, 3) Monitoring, evaluasi dan laporan, 4) Penyediaan data pendukung. 2. Melaksanakan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf b butir 2 yang mencakup: 1) Inventarisasi kondisi jaringan irigasi, 2) Perencanaan pemeliharaan jaringan, 3) Pelaksanaan pemeliharaan jaringan, 4) Pemantauan, evaluasi dan laporan. 3. Melaksanakan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) 4. Menyediakan anggaran dalam dokumen anggaran untuk membiayai kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf b butir 1 dan 2 dan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2). 5. Menyediakan sumber daya yang meliputi sumber daya manusia, bahan, dan peralatan, guna memenuhi kebutuhan operasional kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat(1) huruf b butir 1 dan 2 dan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2). 6. Melaksanakan pembinaan internal aparat/petugas dilingkungan PIHAK KETIGA 7. Melaksanakan pengawasan melekat pada kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) huruf b butir 1 dan 2 serta kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) yang menjadi tanggung jawabnya. 8. Melaksanakan kegiatan penertiban di jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur yang terkait dengan: 1) Pembagian dan pemberian air, 2) Penggunaan air secara liar, 3) Pemanfaatan sempadan saluran.

d. Rincian kegiatan dan pembagian tugas dari PARA PIHAK sebagaimana tertera dalam Lampiran I yang merupakan satu kesatuan yang tidak terpisahkan dari Perjanjian ini.

Pasal 6 PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI

Dalam pelaksanaan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 huruf a PARA PIHAK: (1) Wajib melaksanakan inventarisasi jaringan irigasi melalui penelusuran jaringan irigasi oleh petugas bersama sama dengan perkumpulan petani pemakai air ( P3A ) , menyusun rencana kegiatan secara menyeluruh dan terpadu dan mengsinergikan kemampuan anggaran dan DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 6 of 11



sumber daya yang tersedia dan disepakati bersama dalam rangka mendukung pelaksanaan kegiatan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi (2) Wajib memusatkan perhatian pada kegiatan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi yang menjadi tugas dan tanggung jawabnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 5 ayat 1 huruf a dan b (3) Dapat saling membantu dalam melaksanakan tugas dan tanggung jawabnya (4) Wajib melaksanakan kegiatan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 5 ayat 2 berdasarkan rencana kegiatan terpadu yang telah disusun dan disepakati bersama.

Pasal 7 KOORDINASI PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI

Koordinasi pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 huruf b oleh PARA PIHAK : (1) Diselenggarakan sekurang-kurangnya 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun. (2) Kegiatan koordinasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) dapat dilaksanakan melalui: a. Penyelenggaraan rapat, pertemuan, forum konsultasi, b. Hubungan melalui media elektronik, c.

Peninjauan lapangan bersama.

(3) Kegiatan koordinasi sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) meliputi kegiatan: a. Sinkronisasi program pengelolaan jaringan irigasi, b. Sinkronisasi pelaksanaan operasi, pemeliharaan dan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi, c.

Sinergi dalam penyediaan dan pemanfaatan dana dan sumber daya (personil, material dan peralatan),

d. Pembiayaan jaringan irigasi, e. Pengawasan terhadap kerjasama pengelolaan jaringan irigasi f.

Pemberdayaan masyarakat dan/atau para pemilik kepentingan,

g. Pembinaan aparat/petugas pengelolaan jaringan irigasi, h. Laporan. (4) Pelaksanaan koordinasi perjanjian kerjasama ini dipimpin oleh Kepala Dinas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Provinsi Jawa Barat mewakili Gubernur Jawa Barat selaku wakil Pemerintah di daerah berdasarkan asas Dekonsentrasi sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 15/PRT/M/2011 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum yang merupakan kewenangan Pemerintah dan dilaksanakan melalui Dekonsentrasi dan Tugas Pembantuan

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 7 of 11



Pasal 8 PEMBIAYAAN PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI

Pembiayaan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 huruf c diselenggarakan oleh PARA PIHAK sebagai berikut : (1) Pembiayaan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi primer dan sekunder menjadi tanggung jawab PARA PIHAK sesuai dengan bidang tugasnya (2) Pembiayaan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi primer dan sekunder didasarkan atas angka kebutuhan nyata pengelolaan jaringan irigasi (3) Perhitungan angka kebutuhan nyata pengelolaan jaringan irigasi dilakukan secara terpadu oleh PARA PIHAK bersama dengan perkumpulan petani pemakai air berdasarkan penelusuran jaringan irigasi dengan memperhatikan kontribusi perkumpulan petani pemakai air (4) Prioritas penggunaan biaya pengelolaan jaringan irigasi disepakati oleh PARA PIHAK bersama dengan perkumpulan petani pemakai air. (5) Pekerjaan rehabilitasi atau kegiatan lain yang bersifat mendesak bagi kepentingan PIHAK KEDUA dan/ atau PIHAK KETIGA akan tetapi belum menjadi prioritas nasional dilaksankan oleh PARA PIHAK dengan saling bekerja sama dalam pembiayaan (6) Pembiayaan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 huruf c disediakan oleh PARA PIHAK melalui dokumen anggaran masing – masing untuk mendukung pemenuhan kebutuhan operasional sumber daya yang diperlukan meliputi: a. Kebutuhan penyediaan sumber daya manusia : b. Kebutuhan penyediaan bahan, c.

Kebutuhan penyediaan peralatan

(7) Jumlah kebutuhan kebutuhan tenaga operasi dan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur sebanyak 1585 orang. Jumlah petugas operasi dan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur yang disediakan oleh KETIGA PIHAK sebanyak 1390 orang dengan perincian PIHAK I menyediakan 50 orang, PIHAK II menyediakan 1238 orang dan PIHAK III menyediakan 102 orang. (8) Daftar nama petugas/ tenaga operasi dan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur sebagaimana tertera dalam lampiran II yang merupakan satu kesatuan dengan Perjanjian ini.

Pasal 9 PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DAN/ATAU PARA PEMILIK KEPENTINGAN

Pemberdayaan masyarakat dan/atau para pemilik kepentingan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 huruf d dilaksanakan oleh PARA PIHAK: a. Dengan berbasis kelompok, b. Dengan mendorong masyarakat untuk berpartisipasi dalam pekerjaan tertentu, c.

Dengan semangat kemitraan dan kemandirian ,guna meningkatkan rasa memiliki, rasa tanggung jawab serta meningkatkan kemampuan masyarakat dalam rangka mewujudkan efisiensi, efektivitas dan keberlanjutan sistem irigasi,

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 8 of 11



d. Secara terpadu terkait dengan tugas dan tanggung jawab PARA PIHAK, e. Dengan sasaran untuk meningkatkan kesadaran dan kemampuan untuk ikut berperan dalam pengelolaan irigasi, f.

Melalui sarana sosialisasi, motivasi, kunjungan lapangan, pertemuan berkala, bimbingan teknis, pendidikan dan pelatihan, pendampingan, fasilitasi dan studi banding.

Pasal 10 PEMBINAAN APARAT/PETUGAS PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI

Pembinaan aparat/ petugas pengelolaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 huruf e dilaksanakan oleh PARA PIHAK melalui: (1) Peningkatan kemampuan profesional dan moral aparat/petugas pengelolaan jaringan Irigasi, guna menjaga dan meningkatkan fungsi jaringan irigasi. (2) Pembinaan internal oleh PARA PIHAK dilingkungannya masing-masing. (3) Pembinaan teknis secara menyeluruh dilakukan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum sebagai instansi pembina melalui program pembinaan masingmasing Direktorat dilingkungan Direktorat jenderal Sumber Daya Air.

Pasal 11 PENGAWASAN TERHADAP KERJASAMA PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI

Pengawasan terhadap kerjasama pengelolaan jaringan irigasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 huruf f dilakukan oleh: (1) PARA PIHAK dengan : a. Melaksanakan pengawasan melekat di lingkungan masing-masing melalui kegiatan pemantauan, evaluasi tugas masing-masing agar sesuai dengan norma, standar, pedoman dan kriteria (NSPK) dan standar pelayanan minimal (SPM) b. Melakukan koreksi dan penertiban terhadap penyimpangan yang terjadi sesuai dengan tugas dan tanggung jawabnya yang mencakup: 1) Pemanfaatan sempadan saluran, 2) Pembagian dan pemberian air, 3) Penggunaan air secara liar. c.

Memberikan kesempatan kepada masyarakat untuk ikut berperan dalam pengawasan pengelolaan jaringan irigasi dalam bentuk laporan dan pengaduan masyarakat serta menindaklanjuti laporan dan pengaduan tersebut.

d. Melaporkan kepada pimpinan PARA PIHAK. (2) Direktorat Jenderal Sumber daya Air, Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum sebagai pembina pengelola sumber daya air dengan melakukan pengawasan umum terhadap pelaksanaan perjanjian kerjasama pengelolaan jaringan irigasi Jatiluhur ini

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 9 of 11



Pasal 12 JANGKA WAKTU PELAKSANAAN

(1) Perjanjian Kerjasama berlaku untuk jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak tanggal penandatanganan perjanjian ini. (2) Pelaksanaan perjanjian sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) dievaluasi dan dinilai efektifitasnya. (3) Berdasarkan penilaian sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) masa berlakunya perjanjian kerjasama dapat dihentikan atau diperpanjang berdasarkan kesepakatan PARA PIHAK yang dituangkan dalam perjanjian tersendiri. (4) Perpanjangan perjanjian kerjasama sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (3) dilakukan dengan memperhatikan umpan balik hasil evaluasi guna perbaikan kinerja yang akan datang. Pasal 13 KEADAAN KAHAR (1) PARA PIHAK dibebaskan dari kewajiban dan/atau tanggungjawab berdasarkan perjanjian ini yang disebabkan oleh keadaan atau kejadian yang berada diluar kekuasaan dan kemampuan PARA PIHAK. (2) Keadaan kahar sebegaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) antara lain berupa: a. Bencana alam. b. Kerusuhan massa yang merusak jaringan irigasi. c.

Kerusuhan massa yang menghalangi PARA PIHAK melaksanakan perjanjian Kerjasama ini

d. Kebijakan pemerintah yang mempengaruhi terlaksananya perjanjian kerjasama ini e. Hal-hal lainnya yang disepakati oleh PARA PIHAK. (3) Keadaan kahar harus dinyatakan Bupati/Walikota setempat.

oleh

pejabat

yang

berwenang

serendah-rendahnya

Pasal 14 PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN

(1) Perselisihan yang terjadi akibat pelaksanaan perjanjian kerjasama ini, pada tahap pertama akan diselesaikan secara musyawarah dan mufakat oleh PARA PIHAK. (2) Dalam hal penyelesaian perselisihan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) tidak diperoleh kesepakatan, PARA PIHAK dapat menempuh upaya penyelesaian diluar pengadilan atau melalui pengadilan. (3) Upaya penyelesaian perselisihan diluar pengadilan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat 2 dilakukan dengan arbitrase atau alternatif penyelesaian perselisihan sesuai dengan peraturan perundangundangan (4) Dalam hal penyelesaian perselesihan melalui pengadilan , PARA PIHAK memilih kedudukan hukum di Pengadilan Negeri Bandung.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 10 of 11



Pasal 15 PENUTUP

Perjanjian Kerjasama ini ditandatangani oleh PARA PIHAK dalam rangkap 3 (tiga) dan bermeterai, masing-masing mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sama.

PIHAK KESATU

PIHAK KEDUA

PIHAK KETIGA

Kepala Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum

Kepala DPSDA Provinsi Jawa Barat

Direktur Utama Perum Jasa Tirta II

(DR. A. HASANUDIN, ME)

(IR. DEDDI MULYADI)

(IR. EDDY A. DJAJADIREJA, DIPL HE)

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 11 of 11



Lampiran I : Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan Jaringan Irigasi Jatiluhur RINCIAN KEGIATAN DAN PEMBAGIAN TUGAS

 Penanggung jawab  Pendukung KEGIATAN

NO

1 PENGELOLAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI 1.1 Operasi dan pemeliharaan jaringan Irigasi 1. Operasi Jaringan Irigasi Primer Dan sekunder a. Perencanaan operasi jaringan irigasi • penyediaan air tahunan • tata tanam detail • rapat komisi irigasi untuk menyusun rencana tata tanam • SK Gubernur G b mengenaii rencana ttata t tanam t • perencanaan pembagian dan pemberian air tahunan b. Pelaksanaan operasi jaringan irigasi • Laporan keadaan air dan tanaman • Penentuan rencana kebutuhan air di pintu pengambilan • Pencatatan debit saluran • Penetapan pembagian air pada jaringan sekunder dan primer • Pencatatan debit sungai/ bangunan pengambilan • Perhitungan factor k atau factor palawija relative (fpr) • Laporan produktivitas dan neraca pembagian air • Rekap per kabupaten R k k b t per masa ttanam • Rekap keseluruhan • Pengoperasian bangunan pengatur irigasi c. Monitoring , evaluasi dan laporan • Monitoring pelaksanaan operasi • Kalibrasi alat ukur • Monitoring kinerja sistem irigasi d. Penyediaan data pendukung : • Peta wilayah kerja pengelolaan irigasi sesuai dengan tugas dan tanggung jawab • Peta daerah irigasi dengan pembagian golongan • Skema jaringan irigasi • Skema rencana pembagian dan pemberian air • Gambar purna konstruksi untuk saluran dan bangunan • Manual pengoperasional bendung, bangunan ukur debit, bangunan khusus lainnya • Data seri curah hujan • Data debit sungai • Data debit saluran • Data lainnya 2. Pemeliharaan Jaringan Irigasi 2.1. Jaringan Irigasi Primer a. Inventarisasi kondisi jaringan irigasi b. perencanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi yang meliputi: • Inspeksi rutin • Penelusuran jaringan irigasi • Identifikasi dan analisis tingkat kerusakan • Survai dan Pengukuran • Pembuatan detail desain • Perhitungan RAB • Penyusunan program/rencana kerja yang terdiri 1). pekerjaan swakelola (pemeliharaan rutin, pemeliharaan berkala yang bersifat perawatan dan penanggulangan 2). pekerjaan kontraktual (pekerjaan yang bersifat perbaikan, perbaikan berat dan penggantian) c. pelaksanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi meliputi: • Pengamanan jaringan irigasi (tindakan pencegahan dan tindakan pengamanan) • Pemeliharaan rutin (perawatan, perbaikan ringan) • Pemeliharaan berkala (perawatan, perbaikan, penggantian) • Perbaikan darurat (penanggulangan segera dengan konstruksi tidak permanen) d. Pemantauan, evaluasi dan laporan • Mingguan • Bulanan • Akhir

DHV, Deltares, MLD

BBWS CITARUM

DPSDA PROV JABAR

PERUM JASA TIRTA II





    

 



         



  

 





KETERANGAN

Laporan hasil monitoring dan evaluasi operasi jaringan irigasi dikirimkan ke BBWS Citarum











    

   

Semua manual OP & hasil komisioning diserahkan kepada PJT II

   

            



   

Laporan pemantauan dan evaluasi pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi primer dikirimkan ke BBWS Citarum

page 1 of 3




 Penanggung jawab  Pendukung KEGIATAN

NO

2.2. Jaringan irigasi sekunder a. Inventarisasi kondisi jaringan irigasi b. perencanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi yang meliputi: • Inspeksi rutin • Penelusuran jaringan irigasi • Identifikasi dan analisis tingkat kerusakan • Survai dan Pengukuran • Pembuatan P b t detail d t il d desain i • Perhitungan RAB • Penyusunan program/rencana kerja yang terdiri 1). pekerjaan swakelola (pemeliharaan rutin, pemeliharaan berkala yang bersifat perawatan dan penanggulangan 2). pekerjaan kontraktual (pekerjaan yang bersifat perbaikan, perbaikan berat dan penggantian) c. pelaksanaan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi meliputi: • Pengamanan jaringan irigasi (tindakan pencegahan dan tindakan pengamanan) • Pemeliharaan rutin (p g ) (perawatan, p perbaikan ringan) • Pemeliharaan berkala (perawatan, perbaikan, penggantian) • Perbaikan darurat (penanggulangan segera dengan konstruksi tidak permanen) d. Pemantauan, evaluasi dan laporan • Mingguan • Bulanan • Akhir 1.2 Rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi a. Pra Perencanaan Pembahasan skala prioritas pekerjaan rehabilitasi di komisi irigasi b. Perencanaan • Pengumpulan data • Survey/ pengukuran • Perencanaan sistem irigasi • Desain rinci • Perhitungan rencana anggaran biaya • Penyusunan program/ rencana kerja c. Pelaksanaan • Persiapan - Sosialisasi - Pengadaan jasa kontraktor • Pelaksanaan rehabilitasi d. Pemantauan , evaluasi dan pelaporan • Mingguan • Bulanan • Akhir

II

KOORDINASI 2.1 Pengelolaan jaringan irigasi • Perumusan rencana tahunan penyediaan, y pembagian, g dan pemberian air irigasi yang efisien bagi pertanian dan keperluan lain • Perumusan rencana tata tanam dengan mempertimbang kan data debit air yang tersedia irigasi, pemberian air serentak atau golongan, kesesuaian jenis tanaman, serta rencana pembagian dan pemberian air •

Perumusan rencana pemeliharaan dan rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi yang meliputi prioritas penyediaan dana, pemeliharaan, dan rehabilitasi

• Pemberian pertimbangan dan masukan atas pemberian izin alokasi air untuk kegiatan perluasan layanan jaringan irigasi • Pembahasan dan pemberian pertimbangan dalam mengatasi permasalahan daerah irigasi akibat kekeringan, kebanjiran, dan akibat bencana alam lain • Pemberian masukan dan pertimbangan dalam upaya menjaga keandalan dan keberlanjutan sistem irigasi 2.2 Program dan pembiayaan • Penyusunan program dan biaya untuk masing –masing pihak pengelolaan irigasi jatiluhur secara terpadu 2.3 Pelaporan

DHV, Deltares, MLD

BBWS CITARUM

DPSDA PROV JABAR

PERUM JASA TIRTA II





     

   

KETERANGAN

  



 







  

Laporan pemantauan dan evaluasi pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi primer dikirimkan ke BBWS Citarum





     

























































  

Perencanaan dilaksanakan secara swakelola dan atau kontraktual

  

Berdasarkan PERMEN PU Nomor 02/PRT/M/2008 dan PERMEN PU Nomor 03/PRT/M/2008: Koordinasi Kegiatan Pengelolaan Jaringan Irigasi Pemerintah di daerah dilaksanakan oleh Gubernur melalui Kepala DPSDA Provinsi

page 2 of 3




 Penanggung jawab  Pendukung BBWS CITARUM

KEGIATAN

NO

DPSDA PROV JABAR

PERUM JASA TIRTA II

KETERANGAN

III PEMBIAYAAN 3.1 Rehabilitasi Jaringan Irigasi Jatiluhur • Primer • Skunder 3.2 Operasi Jaringan Irigasi Jatiluhur • Primer • Skunder P lih JJaringan i IIrigasi i i JJatiluhur til h 3 3 Pemeliharaan 3.3 • Primer • Skunder 3.4 Penanganan pada kondisi khusus (mendesak) melalui sharing pembiayaan /pembiayaan bersama • Operasi jaringan primer dan sekunder • Pemeliharaan jaringan primer • Pemeliharaan jaringan sekunder Rehabilitasi jaringan primer dan sekunder

      Rencana Event Nasional

   

   

   

        

        

        

IV PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT/PARA PEMILIK KEPENTINGAN Jenis kegiatan Pemberdayaan a. Sosialisasi b. Motivasi c. Kunjungan lapangan d. Pertemuan berkala e. Fasilitasi f. Studi Banding g. Bimbingan teknis h. Pendidikan dan Pelatihan i. Pendampingan

V PEMBINAAN APARAT/PETUGAS 5.1 Pembinaan internal • Aparat PJT II • Aparat DPSDA Prov. Jabar • Aparat BBWS Citarum 5.2 Pendidikan/Pelatihan Teknins

   





VI PENGAWASAN 6.1 Pengawasan melekat • Operasi jaringan irigasi primer dan sekunder • Pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi primer • Pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi sekunder • Rehabilitasi jaringan irigasi primer dan sekunder 6.2 Pemantauan dan evaluasi kegiatan a. Kegiatan operasi jaringan irigasi b. Kegiatan pemeliharaan c. Kegiatan rehabilitasi d. Kinerja sistem irigasi 6.3 Penertiban a. Pembagian dan pemberian air b. Penggunaan air liar c. Pemanfaatan sempadan saluran 6.4 Tindaklanjut terhadap laporan/pengaduan masyarakat 6.5 Evaluasi terhadap perjanjian kerjasama 6.6 Laporan

DHV, Deltares, MLD

             



  

     

     

Hasil pengawasan dilaporkan ke

PIHAK KESATU Kepala Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum

PIHAK KEDUA Kepala DPSDA Provinsi Jawa Barat

PIHAK KETIGA Direktur Utama Perum Jasa Tirta II


(IR. DEDDI MULYADI)

(IR. EDDY A. DJAJADIREJA, DIPL HE)

page 3 of 3


Annex I.3 – Role Sharing Draft MoU LAMPIRAN II : Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan Jaringan Irigasi Jatiluhur DAFTAR NAMA TENAGA OPERASI DAN PEMELIHARAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JATILUHUR NAMA

NO.

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

3

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

2 DEVISI PENGELOLAAN AIR I SEKSI TARUM BARAT A. Pengamat I 1 Ahmad Hariri 2 Iman Suherman 3 Sarim S 4 Odim 5 Hendrik 6 Candra Adinata 7 Apud Mahpudin 8 Mista Sumantri 9 Suhaya 10 Wahidin 11 Dede Karwita 12 Engkos Koswara 13 Hendra Kurniawan 14 Jonih Pirdaus 15 Indra Kelana bin. Z 16 Iwan 17 Ruspandi S Permana 18 Ujang Nasan 19 Arif Kurniawan

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung

B.Tb. 6 - 8 B.Tb. 4 - 6 B.Tb. 1 - 3 B.Cb. 3 - 4c B.Tb. 8 - 10 B.Cb. 2 - 3 B.Tb. 11 - 14 B.Tb. 20 - 22 B.Tb. 14 - 17 B.Cb. 0 - 2 B.Tb. 17 - 20 B.Tb. 10 - 11 Bend. Cibeet Bend. Cibeet Bend. Cibeet Bend. Cibeet Bend. Cibeet Bend. Cibeet Bend. Cibeet

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

B. Pengamat II 1 Acep Ukar 2 Ajim Pangestu 3 Atang 4 Edi Juhendi 5 Moch.Encum S. 6 Nandang K.L 7 Omsah Hendra 8 Sarja Hermawan 9 Solih Lesmana 10 Ujang Baehaqi 11 Tomy Indrayana 12 Rifki Rachman 13 Herriansyah Hrp 14 Hasbi N 15 Naryo Sunaryo 16 Fitri Muksin P 17 Nanang Supriatna 18 Suherman 19 Marjaya 20 Sukarman 21 Karda

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Syphon Petugas Syphon Petugas Syphon Petugas Syphon

B.Tb. 30 - 32b B. Cikarang B.Tb. 25 - 27 B.Tb.34-B.CKR B.Tb. 23a - 23 B.Tb. 23 - 24 B.Tb. 33 - 34b B.Tb. 24 - 25 B.Tb. 27 - 30 B.Tb. 32b - 33 Bend. Cikarang Bend. Cikarang Bend. Cikarang Bend. Cikarang Bend. Cikarang Bend. Cikarang Bend. Cikarang Syphon Cibeet Syphon Cibeet Syphon Cibeet Syphon Cibeet

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57

C. Pengamat III 1 Atong Subaeni 2 Syarif 3 Robin Hujairi 4 Jojo Supriatna 5 Salman 6 Markim 7 Fikri Kurnia Diwara 8 Erlan Nova Riyanto 9 Dwi Sandi Saputra 10 Dedi Lukman B 11 Dahlan 12 Fajar Budi Santoso 13 Musapiiqul 14 Drajat Eko S. 15 Asmawi 16 Karman 17 Rosid

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung

B.Tb. 35a - 36 B.Tb. 36 - 38 B.Tb. 42 - 44 B. Bks-P. Nowo B.Tb. 40 - 42 B.Tb. 38 - 40 B.Tb. 44- B.Bks Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi Bend. Bekasi

1 I.

II. 58 59

SEKSI CIPAMINGKIS A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Cibarusah 1 Agung Suwarjito 2 Aries Noerdiana

DHV, Deltares, MLD

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6

PJT II 8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√ √ page 1 of 22


Annex I.3 – Role Sharing Draft MoU LAMPIRAN II : Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan Jaringan Irigasi Jatiluhur DAFTAR NAMA TENAGA OPERASI DAN PEMELIHARAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JATILUHUR NO.

NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125

2

3

4

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68

Iyep Nasrudin Cucu Juanda Saipudin Azuhri Dini Indriyani Cecep Sukiyani Hendri Kurnia Herna Hermawan Harun Rahmat Apandi M. Sopyadin Ajat Somantri Ujang Suhana Yori Solihin Asep Wahyudin Emus Gunawan Abu Bakar Agung Permana Dedi Mulyadi Nurdin Mutaqin Oga Nugraha Andi Dedi Supriatna Anwar Doni Kurniawan Ayo Hartoyo Tauffani Hidayat Hendra Cipta Aldi Adam Bahrudin Haryadi Suparman Emur Suharjo Dadang Sutiwa Ade Suprapto Emus Mustofa Ihya Ulumuddin Deni Gunawan Hendra Irawan Saki Sukadi Nara Ina Rusana Samsul Anwar Surdi Iyus Kadarusman Yudi Irawan Asep Saemunir Asep Suherman Asep Munawar Jupen Dede Permana Sanusi Ahmadilah Umar Rahmadi Sajum Bin Saman Yoyo Yayat Nurhayat Muhammad Yunan Deden Suryana Aden Mustopa Dina Marsudi Yakub Supriatna Fuad Abdul Latif Bayu Angga Sugara Janwar Nurhidayat Jaja satibi Erlias Subiyantara

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

Bend. C.mingkis Bend. C.mingkis Bend. C.mingkis BCb.4 - BCb. 5f BCb.5g - BCb. 6a BCb.6b - BCb. 7a BCb.7 - BCb. 9 BMe.1 - BMe.3 BMe.6a - BMe.7 BMe.7 - BPl.2a BTm.5a - BTm.7 BTm.8a - BTm.9 BPl.1 - BRb.3 BPl.2b - BPl.3 BMe.4 - BMe.5 BCb.10 - BCb.11 BCb.12 - BCb.15 BCb.16 - BCb.18 BSa.3 - BSa.5 BSa.6 - BSa.10 BCk.1 - BCk.3 BCk.4 - BCk.7 BLe.1a - BLe.3 BLe.4 - BLe.6 BLe.7 - BLe.9 BPe.1 - BPe.4 BPl.4a - BPl.5 BJt.1 - BJt.3 BPp.1 - BPp.3 BPp.4 - BPp.6 BTe.1 - BTe.3 BTe.7 - BTe.9

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

page 2 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 III.

2

3

4

126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149

SEKSI LEMAHABANG A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Cikarang 1 Ganda Sugita 2 Santa Purwana 3 Sunardi 4 Ramdani 5 Wahab 6 Cahyadi 7 Hoerul Nasar 8 Nurmin 9 Nursan 10 Yanto Ari Sumarna 11 Suparman 12 Kardani 13 Saeful Muhtadin 14 Abdul Kahfi 15 Riki 16 Abdul Rohim 17 Dartim Sahrudin 18 Andri Kosasih 19 Hasan 20 Marta 21 Warman 22 Ari Hidayatullah 23 Heru Syafrudin 24 Usman

150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Pebayuran 1 Awaludin Budiono 2 Usadi 3 Budi Nugraha 4 Ujang 5 Sarman 6 Jumtari 7 Undiah 8 Rohman 9 Mohamad Sahroni 10 Taufik Romansyah 11 Maman 12 Taufik Rahman 13 Eman Tugiman 14 Bahrul Ulum 15 Warka Suhendar 16 Hasanudin 17 Cece Supriyadi 18 Syarip Hidayat 19 Awan 20 Ramadiansyah

170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 IV. 179 180 181 182 183 184 185

DPSDA JABAR 6

BRbd. 2 - BRbd. 3 Bpbe. 3 - Bpbe. 4 Bpbe. 5 - Bpbe. 6 Bpbe. 7 - Bpbe. 8 BRk. 7 - BRk. 8 BRk. 5 - BRk. 6 BRbd. 7 - BRbd. 8 BRbd. 9 - BRbd. 10 BRk. 2 - BRk. 4 BRbd. 17 - BRbd. 18 BRbd. 19 - BRbd. 20 BKw. 4 - BKw. 6 BKw. 1 - BKw. 3 Bla. 1 - Bla. 3 BSt. 5 - BSt. 6 BSt. 9 - BSt. 10 BSt. 11 - BSt. 12 BSt. 13 - BSt. 14 BSt. 17 - BSt. 18 BSt. 19 - BSt. 20 BTr. 1 Kantor Pengamat Bendung Lemahabang Bla. 4 - Bla. 6

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA CS

BKg. 15 BKg. 3 - BKg. 4 BKg. 17 - BKg. 18 BKg. 3 - BKg. 4 BKg. 1 - BKg. 2 BKg. 4 - BKg. 7 BRsg. 1 - BRsg. 3 BKg. 15 - BKg. 16 BKg. 25 - BKg. 26 BKg. 19 - BKg. 20 BKg. 14 - BKg. 15 BKg. 13 - BKg. 14 BKg. 11a - BKg. 11 BRsg. 4 - BRsg. 6 BKg. 10 - BKg. 11a BKg. 12 - BKg. 13 BKg. 9 - BKg. 10 BKg. 15 BKg. 7 - BKg. 8 Kantor Pengamat

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Cabangbungin 1 Dayat 2 Hendrik 3 Ridwan Muhamad Nur 4 Ocid 5 Asep Sopyan 6 Saripudin 7 Adang Saputra 8 Kosasih 9 Amaludin

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

BKg. 28 - BKg. 29 BKg. 29 - BKg. 30 BKg. 27 - BKg. 28 BKg. 31 - BKg. 32 BKg. 32 - BKg. 33 BKg. 48 - BKg. 49 BKg. 34 - BKg. 35 BKg. 30 - BKg. 31 BKg. 26 - BKg. 27

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

SEKSI BEKASI A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Babelan 1 Suhadi Oey 2 Dei Suhendi 3 Boneng 4 Marsin Danuri 5 Encun Subari 6 Rojudin 7 Sanim

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

But. 1 - But. 2 But. 7 - But. 9 But. 9 - But. 11 But. 11 - But. 13 PU 1 - PU. 7 Bog. 7 - Bog. 12 BTn. 1 - BTn. 3

√ √ √ √ √ √ √

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA Staf Pengamat Petugas Bendung PPA

BBWS CITARUM 5

PJT II 8

√ √ √

√

page 3 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197

2

3 PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

4

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Dodi Iskandar Abdul Rahman Agus Makmur Abdul Habib Basri Maher Iwan Setiawan Arip Surahman Robi Zulkarnain Nursan Muhamad Kuto Wijoyo Hambali

BTn. 3 - BTn. 6 BTn. 6 - BTn. 9 BTn. 9 - BTn. 12 BTn. 12 - BTn. 15 BTn. 15 - BTn. 19 BP. 2-3 - Bte. 2 Bpa. 2-3 - Bte. 2 But. 4 - BPt. 4 BPt. 4 - BPt. 8 BKm. 1 - BKm. 3 BKm. 3 - BKm. 6 But. 13 - But. 15

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Sukatani 1 Nirwan Effendi 2 Samlawi 3 Ceman 4 Jaelani 5 Salim 6 Lamin 7 Herwin Herawan 8 Supandi 9 Rapit 10 Jaya Sukmanegara

Petugas Bendung PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

Bend. CBL - BSh. 1 BPsh. 2 - BGt. 6 BPsh. 5 - BPsh. 10 BKb. 10 - BKb. 16 BSh. 27 - BKr. 6 BSh. 27 - BSh. 34 BSh. 09 - BSh. 13 BBt. 1 - BBt. 3 BKb. 4 - BKb. 10 BBt. 4 - BBt. 7

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Cibitung 1 Ita 2 Rarat 3 Nawin 4 Manin 5 M. Tasa 6 Lahir 7 Niat 8 Sain 9 Nemin 10 Hasan Basri 11 Danih 12 Subur 13 Jukih 14 Simin 15 Mirjan Sumarjan 16 Mudan 17 Supenin 18 Misar 19 Sarjaya 20 Amin 21 Samen 22 Rasim 23 Puan 24 Samit Ibrahim 25 Achmad 26 Aran 27 Udin Japra 28 Nadih

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

Bma. 10 BPb. 1 - BPb. 3 BPb. 4 - BPb. 5 BPb. 6 - BPb. 7 BPb. 8 - BPb. 9 BPb. 11 - BPb. 13 Bma. 13 BLs. 1 - BLs. 2 Bma. 14 Bma. 12 Bpe. 1 - Bpe. 2 BPs. 3 - BPs. 4 BSbr. 1 - BSbr. 2 Bma. 11 BKl. 1 - BKl. 2 BKl. 3 - BKl. 4 BKl. 5 - BKl. 6 BKm. 19 BKl. 7 - BKl. 8 BSbr. 2 - BSbr. 3 Bma. 15 - Bma. 16 Bma. 16 - Bma. 17 Bma. 21 - Bma. 22 Bma. 18 Bma. 19 - Bma. 20 Bma. 23 - Bma. 24 Bma. 27 Bma. 28 - Bma. 29

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248

D. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Tambun 1 Ade Nur Fajar 2 Aang 3 Hasum 4 Taryono 5 Acim Supriyadi 6 Pandih 7 Tamin 8 Sarto 9 Dahlan 10 Jono 11 Ridwan S 12 Emad 13 Rahmat

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

Kantor Seksi Bekasi BRwb. 5 - BRwb. 7 BRwb. 9 - BRwb. 14 BRwb. 7 - BRwb. 9 BJgn. 6 - BJgn. 8 BRwb. 5 - BGbd. 4 BRwb. 10 - BRwb. 19 BGbd. 5 - BGbd. 8 BGbd. 4-5 - BTk. 3 BGbd. 8 - BGbd. 11 BTb. 35 - Bma. 2 Bma. 4 - Bma. 8 BJgn. 4 - BJgn. 6

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PJT II 8

page 4 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

1 249 250 251 252 253 254

2

3 PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

14 15 16 17 18 19

LOKASI KERJA 4 Bma. 8 - Bma. 10 BTb. 39 - Bta. 2 Bma. 2 - Bma. 4 BRwb. 3 - BRwb. 4 BRwb. 2 - BRwb. 3 Bma. 8 - Bri. 3

255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277

Denih Muhamad Sobari Achmad Ahmad Fauzi Saman M. Rasam DEVISI PENGELOLAAN AIR II SEKSI TARUM A. Pengamat Bendung Walahar 1 LUKMAN HIDAYAT 2 ARIF RIYADI 3 EKA SETIAWAN 4 EKO PRATOMO 5 Anjar Puradireja 6 Dani Ramdani 7 Dodi Kurniawan 8 Gugun Gunawan 9 Ali Hikmat 10 Ujang 11 Samsori bin Nabing 12 Akim bin Asbo 13 Rohiman 14 Nanang Sunardi 15 Agus Permana 16 Udung Abdullah 17 Harnata 18 Tarya Sutisna 19 Ervan Werviana 20 Luky Ari F 21 Deni Hermawan 22 Uping 23 Harno

278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301

B. Pengamat Sungai dan Irigasi Jatisari 1 Hardiawan 2 Subhan 3 Sobandi 4 Iwan Setiawan 5 Maman Rukmana 6 Kasum 7 AA Nudin 8 Dali 9 Aep 10 Asan 11 Muhamad Fatah 12 Agustian Kurniawan 13 Nana Suryana 14 Dede Sulaeman 15 Hutomi 16 Dedi Wijaya 17 Deni Apiandi 18 Unus 19 Andri 20 Eka Sugianto 21 Kasdi bin Sarinen 22 Ibut Suherman 23 Engking Supardi 24 Deni Wahyudin

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB

SS. TAPEN SS. TAPEN SS. TEMU SS. PACING SS. JATIRAGAS SS. PUNDONG SS. PUNDONG SS. PUNDONG SS. ASIN BARU SS. PUNDONG SS. PUNDONG SS. SARENGSENG SS. SARENGSENG SS. TELAR SS. TAPEN SS. TELAR SS. PACING SS. ASIN BARU Bend. Telar Bend. Telar Bend. Telar Bend. Kalong Bend. Kalong Bend. Kalong

302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310

C. Pengamat Sungai dan Irigasi Telukjambe 1 Atin Setiawan 2 Kedi Bin Kicin 3 Idis Bin Amud 4 Apen Supendi 5 Moh. Iran 6 Harun Sutardi 7 Ali Harudin 8 Yanto Hidayat 9 Abud Mahbudi

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

SS.PASIRPANGGANG SS.RAIJAM SS.KUTAPOHACI SS. CALUNG SS. CALUNG SS.PENGASINAN SS.PENGASINAN SS.PANDAN SS.BOJONG

I.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

adm. Umum & Usaha Operator Bendung Operator Bendung Operator Bendung Operator Bendung Operator Bendung Operator Bendung PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √

Kantor Seksi Tarum Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar BBU. LW. SEUREUH BBU. LW. SEUREUH Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar Bangunan Penerus I Bangunan Penurus II BBU. LW. SEUREUH BBU. LW. SEUREUH BBU. LW. SEUREUH BBU. LW. SEUREUH BBU. LW. SEUREUH BBU. LW. SEUREUH Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar Bendung Walahar

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ page 5 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318

2

3 PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

4

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Asim Miharja Hasan Suhendar Imam Pirdaos Irwan Suteja A.Illan Suparlan Syaifi Nokha Asik Sulaeman Asep Achmad

319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339

D. Pengamat Sungai dan Irigasi Cikampek 1 Saepudin 2 Nanang Suarna bin Iyon 3 Asep Supriatna bin Kadim 4 Ahmad Husaeri 5 Agus Setiawan bin Iyat 6 Nanan Suwandi bin Marno 7 Slamet Supriadi 8 Jajang bin Bayim 9 Heri Suhaeri 10 Saepul Basri bin Amin 11 Agus Surahman 12 Suryana bin H.Muhidin 13 Muhamad Sanusi 14 Teman 15 Ina Hermawan 16 Calim bin Dacim 17 Deden Suherman 18 Endang Casmita 19 Hasan Asrori 20 Taryana Zayadi 21 Rofik

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA Pencatat Debit Air Pencatat Debit Air

340 341 342 343 344

E. Pengamat Sungai dan Irigasi Pangkalan 1 Ahmad Suhendi 2 Yogi Iskandar 3 Marno 4 Usep 5 Ade Suherlan SEKSI RENGASDENGKLOK A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Karawang 1 ADE ROHMAT 2 BADRU JAMAN 3 ASEP SAEPUDIN 4 HUSEN 5 MANSUR HERMANSAH 6 MIAN 7 ODANG SOMANTRI 8 M IKHWAN SETIAWAN 9 KARJA SUKENDAR 10 ENDANG KARNA 11 UJANG FIRDAOS 12 DEDEN SONJAYA 13 EDI PRANATA 14 SAMID SUHANDI 15 AGUS DARTEM 16 BUDI YANTO 17 HARIS SARIPUDIN 18 INDRAYANA SAPUTRA 19 SAEPUDIN 20 JALI SUGIARTO 21 AMINTA KAMA PUTRA 22 BUDI ADHA H 23 WARSA WITARSA 24 SARJI WINATA 25 RANTA RODIANA 26 TASMITA 27 DEDE IWA LESMANA 28 ASEP TRISNO

II. 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372

DHV, Deltares, MLD

SS.BOJONG SS.PASIRPANGGANG SS. CALUNG SS.PINTU SS.PENGASINAN SS.PINTU SS.KUTAPOHACI SS.BOJONG

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

B.Ck. 4 Situ Kamojing B.Kb. 3 B.Kb. 6a B.Kwh 2 B.Lh 2 B.Sl 1' B.Sl 1 B.Kwh 1 B.Kb 1' B.Km 2 B.Ck 5 B.Kp 1 Situ Kamojing B.Kp 2 Situ Kamojing B.Km 3 B.Km 1 B.Pk 1 Situ Kamojing Situ Kamojing

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PPA SMP PPB PPB PPB

SS.PANGKALAN SS.PANGKALAN Bend. Waru Intake SS. Waru Intake SS. Pangkalan

√ √ √ √ √


B.Tub. 1 B.Tub. 1 B.Le. 1 B.Le. 4 B.Le.5 B.Ad.1 B.Ad.4 B.Tub.2 B.Tub.2 B.Tub.3 B.Tub.3 B.La.1 B.La.2 B.Tub.4 B.Tub.4 B.Tub.5 B.Tub.5 B.Tub.6 B.Tub.6 B.Tub.7 B.Tub.7 B.Tub.7 B.Kg.1 B.Jt.1 B.Jt.2 B.Tub.8 B.Tub.8 B.Tub.9

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

page 6 of 22



NO. 1 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

2 CUCU ENCU SAMSUDIN ANDRI APRIANA RUSTANDI WARNO SUTOYO TATAN FATAHUDIN CHARIM USEP SAEPUDIN SULAEMAN HUJNI NAWAS IDRIS

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

BBWS CITARUM 5

3 PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

4 B.Tub.9 B.Tp.1 B.Tp.2 B.Tp.4 B.TUB. 10 B.TUB. 10 B.TUB. 10 B.Pa.1 B.Pa.4 B.Pa.6

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Pedes 1 MADHUSIN 2 KARMITA 3 DODI 4 MASNA 5 NARKIM 6 LOMRI 7 ATMA 8 SUNARYO 9 NAHROWI 10 CHARUM 11 DACE 12 ILYAS 13 MAMAN 14 SUMARNO 15 DEDE. J 16 HAMDAN M 17 ARI HIDAYAT 18 SUDIANTO 19 ADE MARJUKI 20 USEP S 21 EGI R 22 ENDANG 23 ADE KURNIA 24 WAHYU BILAHI 25 WASNA S 26 ANTO R 27 BUDI HERMANSAH


B.Tub. 11 B.Tub. 11 B.Tub. 12 B.Tub. 12 B.Tub. 13 B.Tub. 13 B.Tub. 13 B.Bt. 1 B.Bt. 1 B.Bt. 2 BS. 1 BS. 2 BS. 3 BS. 4 B.Sa. 2 B.Sa. 3 B.SB. 5 BS. 5 BS. 6 B.Rd. 1 B.Rd. 1 B.Rd. 1 B.Pds. 1 BS. 7 BS. 8 BS. 9 BS. 8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Rengasdengklok 1 AMAN SURYAMAN 2 MANURUL H 3 JAMALUDIN 4 LALA S 5 SUWARDI 6 HENDRIK K 7 IIN INDRA P 8 SURYANA A 9 WINARTO 10 WAWAN H 11 CASMITA NP 12 IWAN H 13 DIDIN M 14 AHMAD B 15 HANAFI 16 DARMAWAN 17 AJATMIKA 18 SOLIHIN 19 SUHERMAN 20 BAMBANG H 21 MULYADI 22 SUDARMA 23 DEDI M 24 M.IBROHIM

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

B.Tub. 16 B.Tub. 16 B.Tub. 17 B.Tub. 17 B.Pc. 1 - 2 B.Mda. 1 - 2 B.Bg. 1 B.Jt. 1 B.Kya. 6 B.Kya. 7 B.Ag. 1 B.Kya. 4a B.Tub. 14 B.Tub. 14 B.Tub. 14 B.Tub. 15 B.Tub. 15 B.Tub. 15 B.Ta. 1 B.Ta. 2 B.Kya. 1 B.Kya. 2 B.Ba. 1 - 2 B.Ba. 2

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

434 435

D. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Batujaya 1 ASEP KAMALUDIN 2 ZEZEN MUHRODIN

PPA PPA

B.Tub. 18 B.Ps. 1

√ √

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PJT II 8

page 7 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473

2

4

UES HAMDAN NANANG KOSIM MIJI MARDANI MARDIAN ASEP SAEPULOH ISAN JAMAL HERIYANTO DADANG B HANAFI MURHAJI B NARKIM KARAM B TARM RATAL B ENGKUD EKA K SUARDI WARJI SAPUTRA MARNA ENUR ABDUL SOMAD ROMLI K JUANDA MAJUR ENGGONO LAMTONI JUMRO SARIH H RAHMAT B RATIM NURJAYA B KASWAN BADRUDIN TARSONO B RACAM UDIN MAWARDI MAHMUD B ROMLI MARGA WALIM INDRAYANI H SOLIHIN AMSORI USMAN B SODIK MAHROM B SAHRIN ATIN SUKARTIN BUSRO

3 PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

B.Ai B.Sw. 1 B.Ps. 2 B.Tub. 18 B.Tub. 18 B.Tub. 19 B.Tub. 19 B.Ps. 1a B.Tub. 20 B.Tub. 20 B.Tub. 21 B.Tub. 21 B.Tbn. 1 B.Tbn. 2 B.Tbn. 3 B.Tub. 22 B.Tub. 22 B.Tub. 22a B.Tbo. 1 B.Tbo. 2 B.Tub. 23 B.Tub. 23 B.Tub. 23a B.Tbu. 1 B.Tbu. 2 B.Tbu. 3 B.Tub. 24 B.Tub. 24 B.Tj. 1 B.Tj. 2 B.Tj. 3 B.Tub. 25 B.Tub. 25 B.Tub. 26 B.Kdw. 1 B.Kdw. 2 B.Kdw. 3 B.Kdw. 3 Hilir

SEKSI TELAGASARI A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Rawamerta 1 Ahmad Zaenudin 2 Ady Hermawan S 3 Jumalnta 4 Saprudin Bin Kemo 5 Ardi Bin Kemo 6 Idi Mulyadi 7 Ferry Bin Aceng 8 Mundang 9 Kana Hanapi Bin Samid 10 Dudung 11 Asmawi Bin Karto'i 12 Sukarya Bin Cungleh 13 Tarsidi Bin Ooy 14 E. Sulaeman Bin Darba 15 Saim Bin Kosim 16 Ono Sumarno Bin Miun 17 Otib Bin Daya 18 Ooy Bin Olim 19 Didin Ikhwanudin 20 Cudit Lesmana 21 Atim Bin Encung 22 Tarjan 23 Ardaya Bin Niman 24 Sunarto bin Sutoyo 25 Joher Waryono Bin watim

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

B.R.0 B.R.0 B.R.1 B.R.2 B.R.3 B.R.4 B.R.5 B.R.6 B.R.6 B.R.8 B.R.8 B.H.1 B.R.9 B.R.10 B.R. 10 B.Ckk.3 B.R.11' B.R.12' B.R. 12 B.R.12 B.R.13.' B.R. 13 B.Clb.1 B.Tjs.2 B.Pt.3

III. 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Telagasari DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 8 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521

2

3 PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

4 B.Tut.1 B.TUT.2' B.Tut.2 B.TUT.2 B.Ml.1 B.Ml.2 B.TUT.3 B.TUT.3-4 BTUT.4 B.Dw.3 B.Tls.2 B.Tls.3 B.Tls.4 B.Tls.5 B.Tls.6 B.Tls.7 B.Tls.8 B.Tls.10 B.Lw.1 B.Lw.1 B.Lw.2 B.Lw.3 B.Lw.4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Epi Jamaludin Yanto Jajang Sopian Indrajaya Niang SG Andi Nuryana Darmawan Setia Yana Suryana Onawan Hendrik Mulandana Ajat Sudrajat Uyan Suryana Didin Muhidin Billy Sahrudin Asep Sudrajat Halim Marjuki Udin Ade Sopandi Enda S Aripin Acung Toto Sudarto

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Lemahabang 1 Casmita 2 Saeri 3 Ucep 4 Dede Juhadi 5 Entang 6 Daming 7 Waryo 8 Rohmat 9 Tedi Rahmat J 10 Urip Pirmansyah 11 Rohadi 12 Mulyadi 13 Surya Bin Udin 14 Andi Bin Di'in 15 Ahmad 16 Sopyan 17 Cali Rahman Bin Adin 18 Dedi Junaedi 19 Dadang Suwardi Bin Sace 20 Sarmo 21 Karna 22 Atim

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

B.TUT.5 B.TUT.5 B.TUT.6 B.TUT.6 B.TUT.7' B.TUT.7 B.TUT.7 B.TUT.5-6 B.TUT.5-6 B.TUT.5-6 B.Po.6 B.Po.6 B.Po.6 B.Cpg.1 B.Smg.1 B.Pot.4 B.Smg.4 B.Pot.4 B.Pou.2 B.TUT.8 B.TUT.8 B.TUT.8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563

D. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Cilamaya 1 Herman 2 Sobari 3 Edi Haryanto 4 Rakib Bin Milyan 5 Karyo 6 Taslim Hendrayan 7 Kosasih Bin Rasja 8 Casban 9 Nenda 10 Sahuri 11 Asep Dadang 12 Odih Bin Tarlim 13 Kenda Suanda 14 Casman 15 Ikin 16 Adang 17 Hendra 18 Usen Bin Wirya 19 Edi Mulyadi 20 Wiryana

PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

B.TUT.9 B.TUT.9 B.TUT.9 B.TUT.10 B.TUT.11 B.TUT.11 SS.Lmb.3 B.Lmb.4 B.Tj.1 B.Byr.1 B.TUT.12 B.TUT.12 B.TUT.13 B.TUT.13 B.TUT.13 B.TUT.14 B.TUT.14 B.Lmt.2 B.Gp.2 B.Lmb.9

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PJT II 8

page 9 of 22


Annex I.3 – Role Sharing Draft MoU LAMPIRAN II : Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan Jaringan Irigasi Jatiluhur DAFTAR NAMA TENAGA OPERASI DAN PEMELIHARAAN JARINGAN IRIGASI JATILUHUR

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

NO.

NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578

2

4

H. Warpan Nata Soleh Bin Selamet Kadmin Dede Irawan Sarkum Usin Bin Sarkum Nurjaman Carim Sarpin Suptiyanto Adon A'ing Sakir Wartomo Warnim Warga Bin Cala

3 PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

B.Mrt.1 B.Mru.1 B.Kl.1 B.Kl.4-5 B.Sj.1 B.Sj.1 B.Sj.2 B.Sj.2 B.Sj.3 B.Tpe.1 B.Tpe.1 B.Tpe.2 B.Tpe.3 B.Tpe.4 B.Tpe.5

579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599

SEKSI PURWAKARTA A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Plered 1 Epi Sapaat 2 Yusup Sutisna 3 Asep Deni 4 Enen Soleh 5 Herdi Hidayat 6 Wawan Hermawan 7 Yanto Saputra 8 Kustiwa 9 Dudi Hermawan 10 Dayat Sudrajat 11 Ridwan 12 Ugan Sugandi 13 Jamaludin 14 Jenal Aripin 15 Heru Ajun Hermawan 16 Yosep Nugraha 17 Wahyudin 18 Mansyur 19 Asep Iim 20 Ahmad Jajuli 21 Jajang Nurjaman

PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP

Bendung Cisomang B.Csg 1 B.Csg 2 B.Csg 4 B.Csg 4 B.Dp 1 B.Dp 3 B.Dp 4 B.Dp 5 B.Dp 7 B.Gs 1 B.Gs 4 B.Gs 9 B.Gs 11 B.Gs 12 B.Gs 14 Bendung Cisomang B.Gs 4 B.Gs 4 B.Gs 6 B.Dp 6

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Wanayasa 1 Acep Hidayat 2 samin Lesmana 3 Ade Riswandi 4 Indria Sigit 5 Iing Solihin 6 Ruli Rahmadi 7 Ruhenda 8 Ayi Supriadi 9 Yanyan Dwiyanto 10 Wahyudin 11 Teguh Syahri.R 12 Benhur Suteja 13 Dede Supriadi 14 Heriyanto 15 Deni Suyanto 16 Hendri supriadi 17 Joni 18 Adam Damanhuri 19 Rudi Rohdiansyah 20 Edri 21 Deri Apriadi 22 Irwan Risdianto 23 Rin Rin Apriani 24 Doni maradoni 25 Asep saripudin 26 Adi Rahman 27 Jejen Jaenudin 28 Yayan sumaryana

PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP

Bendung Pdk. Salam B.Sg 1 B.Sg 2 B.Sg 3 B.Sg 4 B.Sg 5 B.Sg 6 B.Sg 7 B.Sg 8 B.Sg 10 B.Sg 11 B.Sg 12 B.Sg 13 B.Sg 15 B.Sg 16 B.Sk 1 B.Sk 2 B.Sk 3 B.Sk 4 B.Sg 16 B.Sg 17 B.Sg 18 Staf OP B.Sk 7 Situ wanayasa Situ wanayasa Bend.Pondk Salam Situ wanayasa

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

IV.

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PJT II 8

page 10 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636

2

3 PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP PJP

4

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

Hasanudin Apep Rahmat Eris Tubadi Putra Asep Ahmad Ayim Jajat sudrajat M.Yanwar Asyikin Syam Bubun sabarudin Muhamad Junaedi

Situ Cigangsa Situ cibeber Situ Cikamar situ wanayasa Situ Cikamar Situ Cibeber Situ wanayasa Situ wanayasa Situ wanayasa

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648

DEVISI PENGELOLAAN AIR III SEKSI TARUM TIMUR A. Pengamat I 1 ARI ARDIANSAH 2 AHMAD SANUSI 3 ENTANG MULYANA 4 ENGKUS. K 5 SOLIHIN 6 EDI HERDIANA 7 MAMAN 8 SAI SURYANA 9 ADE RUSMANA 10 HERIYUDIN 11 SARKUM 12 ECEP MULYANA

Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan

B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c B.Tt. 1 - 15c

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662

B. Pengamat II 1 SUHANA 2 DEDI TIRTA M 3 DENI SURYADI 4 ITA RASITA 5 SURYADI 6 NANA SUPRIYATNA 7 YOGI SETIAWAN 8 MISBAH 9 EDI PERMANA 10 ASEP SAEPUDIN 11 ADANG 12 JEJEN JAENUDIN 13 ASEP WAHYUDIN 14 ITA PERMANA

Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan

B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a B.Tt. 15' - 26a

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676

C. Pengamat III 1 AMO SUTRISNO 2 NAMIN 3 HERMANTO 4 LIANDI BIN TAYA 5 KARNO BIN ADANG 6 UDIN SAEPUDIN 7 JUMINTA 8 ENDANG JUHANA 9 M.YUSUF RAHAYU 10 MAMAN SUPARMAN 11 SUPRIADI 12 SUDIN 13 NANO SUPARNO 14 WIRAHADIKUSUMA

Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan

B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a B.Tt. 26a - 42a

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686

D. Pengamat IV 1 TATA SUKARTA 2 SAEPULLAH 3 UJANG YAMAN 4 HENDRA SUCIPTO 5 ROTIN ROJIKIN 6 IWAN NUGRAHA 7 WIYAN SAPRUDIN 8 USUP 9 CAHYANI 10 OMAN ROHMAN

Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan

B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

I.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 11 of 22



NO. 1 687 688 689 690

II. 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722

11 12 13 14

2 DADANG ENDARSO JUNI SUTRISNA RANIM DEDI YANTO

SEKSI SUKAMANDI A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Sukamandi 1 Karyono 2 Aceng Ramli 3 Suhaya 4 Onding Durahman 5 Irwan Taufik 6 Didi Fitriadi 7 Wawan Irawan 8 Samin 9 Endang Sutisna 10 Dodi Hartoko 11 Mulyana 12 Agus 13 Adim Miharja 14 Amung Nugraha 15 Heri Irawan 16 Aep 17 Abin Sopandi 18 Ikhmat Kirana 19 Opik Nasorudin 20 Aba 21 Iwan Suwandi 22 Endi 23 Redi Firmansyah 24 Deni Wahyudin 25 Indra Suartono 26 Taryana 27 Sukendar Priatna 28 Dede Wahyudin 29 Ade Sihombing 30 Acep Sutaryan 31 Juju Junaedi 32 Kendi

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

3 Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan Petugas Jaringan Pengairan

4

Petugas Bendung Petugas Bendung PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6

B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d B.Tt. 42a - 53d

Bendung Barugbug Bendung Barugbug Staf Pengamat Staf Pengamat B. Brs 1 B. Brs 2 B. Brs 3 B. Brs 4 B. Brs 5 B. Rwg 2 B. Si 1 B. Si 2 B. Si 3 B. Si 4 B. Si 6 B. Si 7 B. Si 8 B. Si 9 B. Si 10 B. Si 11 B. Si 12 B. Si 15 B. Si 16 B. Gp B. Pko 1 B. Pko 2 B. Pko 3 B. Pko 4 B. Tambak Dami

PJT II 8 √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Ciasem 723

1

OLIH SUPRIADI

TP - OP PSDA

SS. JENGKOL / Bend. JENGKOL

√

724

2

DADI IRAWAN

TP - OP PSDA


√

725

3

SAUD DWI SAPUTRA

TP - OP PSDA


√

726

4

RATNO WIHARJO

TP - OP PSDA


√

727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

RAHMAT SANTOSA FERI FERDIANA ENDANG TIRTANA ABDUL SAMAN ENJANG JAKARIA ANWAR SANUSI KOMARUDIN M. IMRON ADUNG SUHENDA ENDI NARDIO SAHRONIK APID IMAN MARZUKI AA SUPRIATNA SUHERMAN ACEP YOGI DASWA DEDE SUJANA MUMU MUNAWAR H.

TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA

SS. JENGKOL SS. JENGKOL SS. JENGKOL SS. JENGKOL SS. JENGKOL SS. KEBONCAU SS. KEBONCAU SS. KEBONCAU SS. CIASEM SS. CADAS SS. CADAS SS. CADAS SS. CADAS SS. CADAS SS. SENGON SS. SENGON SS. SENGON SS. SENGON SS. SENGON

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 12 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789

2

4

ANJAR RIPAL P UDIN ROHENDI RAMIDI MUSA SETIAWAN FIAN SUGIANTO DIAN NURIANTO S. DEDE KOSWARA DENY ZULFIKAR UNAN HANAFI USMAN SUNANDAR RAHMAT FUJI S. KASIMIN ASEP RUSKIM AHMAD SAEPUL A. RUSDI MULYANA SUGIANTO SARPIN MULYADI JAENUDIN IBNU NUR ALI GOJALI DADI SUPRIADI CADI ROSIDI SUMARNO HAMIM CARMAN TOHANDA ASEP SOLEHUDIN ABDUL ROHMAN MM ACENG RISKIANDAR SURYANTO TARLAN ARDHI PRAMADIA A. SUTRISNO SUMARDI GUGUN GUMILAR HAERON HAMDAN YUWAFI AHMAD SANUSI SUGIH DEDENJUNI EKA P. IMAM ISMAIL

3 TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP-OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OP PSDA TP - OB BBWS TP - OB BBWS TP - OB BBWS

790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Barugbug 1 NURDIAN ISKANDAR 2 ABDUL ROSID 3 SANDI 4 KANDA 5 ADE TRIMARYADI 6 ADE SURYANA 7 AKUM 8 SUHANDI 9 APIT JUANDA 10 AMIR SUNARYA 11 TATANG SAEPUDIN 12 AKING 13 SUGIARTO 14 CUCUM SAMIN 15 PENI GUNAWAN 16 SALIM 17 ANGGA ANDRIANA 18 IIK SODIQ ASGAP 19 DENY GUSTINA

PPB PPB PPB PPB PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA Staf POB PPB Staf POB

III.

SEKSI SUBANG

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67

DHV, Deltares, MLD

SS. SENGON SS. SENGON SS. SENGON SS. SENGON SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. RANCABANGO SS. KAMURANG SS. KAMURANG SS. KAMURANG SS. KAMURANG SS. KAMURANG SS. KAMURANG SS. KAMURANG SS. KARANGTOMAN SS. KARANGTOMAN SS. KARANGTOMAN SS. KARANGTOMAN Kantor PSI CIASEM Kantor PSI CIASEM SS. CADAS SS. Jengkol SS. SENGON SS. Jengkol SS.Jengkol SS.Keboncau SS.Jengkol SS. SENGON SS. RANCABANGO BEND. JENGKOL BEND. JENGKOL BEND. JENGKOL

Bend. Barugbug Bend. Barugbug Bend. Barugbug Bend. Barugbug B. Spn 1 B. Bg 2 B. Bg 3 B. Bg 5 B. Bg 4 B. Bg 7 B. Pb 1 B. Pb 2 B. Pb 3 B. Spn 1 B. Ke 2 B. Spn 2 Bend. Barugbug Bend. Barugbug Bend. Barugbug

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

page 13 of 22



NO. 1

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

3

4

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6

809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841

2 A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Subang 1 SARIP 2 OMAN 3 KOKO MARGADIPURA 4 SURYADI 5 TAUPPIQ RAMADHANIAR F 6 SUTISNA ABDUL HADI 7 ADE YANA 8 ASEP TOPIK HIDAYAT 9 HERLI SAEFULLOH 10 KIKI KISWARA 11 DARSITA 12 DEDEN HENDARSONO 13 MULYADI 14 HAYAT MAHPUDIN 15 YONO MARYONO 16 RIZKI RAMADHAN 17 ADE IMAN FIRMANSYAH 18 AEF NUGRAHA 19 DODI EKA PERMANA 20 ABDUL HOLIK 21 NURDIANSAH 22 ABDUL GOPAR 23 APRIATNA 24 AHMAD YANI 25 DEDE SYAHPUTRA 26 NURYADI 27 ENJANG TAME 28 ASEP YUSUP 29 RONI FIRMANSYAH 30 EBET RENDI NUGRAHA 31 SURLI WALUYO 32 GUGUN GUNTUR GUMILAR 33 CHENDRA ARISANDI ERAWAN

842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Kalijati 1 MAMAN MURTAWAN 2 ASEP HARIS SETIAWAN 3 NINING NURHAYATI 4 CICA ROVIANA 5 SUKARLAN 6 ENDIN TAJUDIN 7 SAMSUDIN 8 DARSAN 9 DEDEN MUNAWAR B 10 SATIAJI 11 ARIF RAHMAN HAKIM 12 RUSCA SUJANA 13 ASEP SUDRAJAT 14 AJAT SUTISNA 15 SUPARTO 16 RAHMAT SAEPULOH

PPA BENDUNG PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA PPA

BENDUNG BCA 21 BCA 13 BCA 15 BCA 6 - 7 BCA 18 - 19 BCA 25 - 27 BCA 14 BCA 11-12 BCA 22-24 BCA 25-27 BCA 4-5 BCA 20 BCA 8-9 BCA 16 BCA 22-24

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Pagaden 1 EDENG HIDAYAT 2 AANG ANASIM 3 JEJEN MIFTAHUDIN 4 MUMUH SUTISNA 5 DADANG PUPUNG PURNAMA 6 FAHRIL RIPANA 7 RIESZA SAPTIADI 8 BUDI SUGIANTO 9 ASEP IWAN 10 ROHMAT HIDAYAT 11 YOGA ADIPURA 12 EMAN SURANTO 13 WAWAN HERNAWAN 14 WARNALI 15 SUKANDA

Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan

Blw 1a Blw 1 BLW 2 BLW 3 BCEU 1 BLW 4 B.CDU 1 BLW 5 KA BLW 5 KI BLWB 1 BLWB 2 BLWB 3 BLWB 4 BLWB 5 BLWB 5

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

DHV, Deltares, MLD

CLEANING SERVIS CLEANING SERVIS PENGEMUDI SEKSI CLEANING SERVIS CLEANING SERVIS PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS JARINGAN PETUGAS BENDUNG PETUGAS BENDUNG PETUGAS BENDUNG PETUGAS BENDUNG

SEKSI SUBANG SEKSI SUBANG SEKSI SUBANG SEKSI SUBANG SEKSI SUBANG DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY DI. CILEULEUY BENDUNG BENDUNG BENDUNG BENDUNG

PJT II 8 √ √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√

page 14 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900

2

4

IJUDIN NONO TARSONO HAMDANI EDI RAHMAT BASUKI DEDENG SOLEHUDIN LILI AGTAM KRISTIAN BUDIANA ROHENDI AHMAN IMRON ZAELANI SUHENDA ENGKOS CARYADI ASEP SUTARYA FARID ISMAIL USEP ASEPROHENDA IRWAN IRWANTO OPIK IRAWAN EDI SUHARDIMAN TARYUDIN TARJAYA SAWINTA DODI HANDRAIKA CAHYAN GUNAWAN ARMAN KADARISMAN TOPAN HERMAWAN DADAN SAEPUDIN

3 Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan Petugas Jaringan OPERATOR BENDUNG OPERATOR BENDUNG OPERATOR BENDUNG

SEKSI BINONG A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Pamanukan 1 Kasda Suhenda 2 Didi Suwandi 3 Iman Takiman 4 Taryadi 5 Kusnadi 6 Husen 7 Amir Syarifudin 8 Hasanudin 9 Rasiman 10 Asep Runakim 11 Acun Toyib 12 Warman 13 Cece Suryana 14 Agus Sutisna 15 Trio Hendi 16 Sahim 17 Hendrawan 18 Ahmad Hidayat 19 Ahmad Fahmi 20 Ade 21 Rahmat Kurniawan 22 Agus Bin Sueb 23 Lukman 24 Agus Suryana 25 Redi Wn 26 Makmur 27 Ali Rukmana 28 Asep Sulaeman 29 Juhana 30 Hasanudin 31 Nandar Sunandar 32 Rahmat Sutrisno 33 Muhamad 34 Moch. Rocidin 35 Andriansah 36 Wadi 37 Carman Lajudin

TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP

IV. 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

DHV, Deltares, MLD

BLWB 6 BLWB 7a BLWB 7a BLWT 1 BLWT 2 BLWT 3 BLWT 4 BLWT 5b BLWT 5 BLWT 6 BLWT 7a BLWT 7 BLWT 8 BLWT 9 BLWT 10 BLWT 12 BLWT 13 BLWT 14 BENDUNG PANGSOR BENDUNG PANGSOR BPAN 1 BPAN 2 BPAN 3 BPAN 4 BPAN 5 LEUWINANGKA LEUWINANGKA LEUWINANGKA

PPA B. G. 1a PPA B. G. 1a Ps B. G. 1a Ps B. G. 1a PPA B. G. 1b PPA B. G. 1b Ps B. G. 1b Ps B. G. 1b PPA B. G. 1 PPA B. G. 2 PPA B. G. 3 PPA B. Sg. 1 PPA B. Sg. 2 PPA B. Sg. 3 PPA B. Sg. 4 PPA B. Sg. 5 PPA B. Sm. 1 PPA B. Sm. 2 PPA B. Sm. 3 PPA B. Sm. 4 PPA B. Dd. 1 PPA B. Dd. 2 PS B. Dd.1-2 PPA B. Tn. 1 PPA B. Tn. 1 PPA B. Tn. 2 PPA B. Tn. 2 PPA B. Tn. 4 PPA B. Tn. 4 PPA B. Tn. 5 PPA B. Tn. 5 PPA B. Ko. 1 PPA B. Ko. 2 PPA B. Ko. 3 PPA B. Cbr. 1 PPA B. Cbr. 2 PPA B. Cbr. 3

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ page 15 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982

2

3 TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP TPOP POB POB POB

4

983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004

38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82

Ruskana Elly Suhaely Endi Mustopa Herwin Arsa Cadi Hendra Wijaya Warno Waryono Dede Rodita Cecep Supriadi Sugiat Cardiman Carman Tatang Sopandi Warsono Sukendar Yayus Yulius Cep Ruhyat Tatang Wardoyo Ekih Hermanto Herman Nana Turyana Atang Sutarna Suhendra Ali Muhyi Dadan Anbari Solehudin Wahyu Hartono Asep Setiawan Dede Carim Suhud Abdul Roni Watli Kandi Wawan Hermawan S Roswenda Edi Sabar Mukhlisin Wawan Setiawan Cariman Santani Ahmad Hidayat Alpin Ramdhani Anto

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Binong 1 Saepudin 2 Darta 3 Sudarjo 4 Kusnadi 5 YaSDn 6 Eka Sanjaya 7 Rohidin 8 Saman Abdullah 9 Riva Perdana 10 Agus Sutisna 11 Abdul HaSDd 12 Dahlan 13 Erwin Hardi 14 Toni Suratman 15 Didi Supriadi 16 Uci Sanusi 17 Abdul Sidik 18 Rouf 19 Zaenal Aripin 20 Dadan Andis 21 Nurkalam 22 Sanudin

DHV, Deltares, MLD

TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P

PPA B. Cbr. 4 PPA B. Cbr. 5 Ps. B.Cbr.1-2 Ps. B.Cbr.2-3 Ps. B.Cbr.3-4 PPA B. Es. 1 PPA B. Es. 2 PPA B. Es. 3 PPA B. Es. 4 Ps. B.Es.1-2 Ps. B.Es.3-4 Ps. B.Es.4-5 PPA B. Kl. 1 PPA B. Kl. 2 PPA B. Kl. 3 PPA B. Kl. 4 PPA B. Kl. 5 PPA B. Kl. 7 PPA B. Kl. 8 PPA B. Kl. 9 B.Agr.1 B.Agr.2 B.Agr.3 B.Agr.4 PB. Bendung Pangaritan PPA B. Pp. 1 PPA B. Pp. 2 PPA B. Pp. 3 PPA B. Tlp. 1 PPA B. Tlp. 2 PPA B. Lg. 1 PPA B. Lg. 2 PPA B. Lg. 3 PPA B. Lg. 4 PPA B. Lg. 4 PPA B. Lg. 5 PPA B. Lg. 6 PPA B. Lg. 7 PPA B. Lg. 8 PPA B. Lg. 9 PPA B. Lg. 10 PPA B. Ln. 1 Bendung Gadung Bendung Gadung Bendung Gadung

PPA B. Pwn. 1 PPA B. Pwn. 2 Ps. B. Pwn. 1-2 PPA B. Pwn. 3 PPA B. Pwn. 4 Ps. B. Pwn. 3-4 PPA B. Pwn. 5 PPA B. Pwn. 6 Ps. B. Pwn. 5-6 PPA B. Pwn. 7 PB. Jungklang PPA B. Me.1a Ps. Me.1a-1 PPA B. Me.1 Ps. Me.1-2 PPA B. Me.2 Ps. Me.2-3 Ps. Me.2-3 PPA B. Me.3 Ps. Me.3-4 PPA B. Me.4 PPA B. Sdi. 1a

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ page 16 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053

2

3 TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P PPB STAF PPB STAF PPB PPB

4

1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71

Kurdianto Santani Nurudin Ade Hermawan Uding Wartim Cari Atmaja Ahamd Jaenal Muttaqin Wirta Mulyana Dedi Supriyatna Rusdi Lukman Saman Sumardi Darto Karnudin TarSDn Asep Arifianto Kastirah M . ASDen Ade Saepudin Sunoto Nasika Bakri Saca Ujang Mardi Cariman Suherlan Edi Suhardi Darmun Atim Muhammad Acim Cartiman Deni Sopian Azis Sopyan Prima Despiandi Devi Dharunah Yuliandhi Caswono Arman Kadarisman Dadan Saepudin Topan Hermawan Aang Jaenudin Agus Wahyu Andiyatno Chaidir Anwar Gugun Guntur GuSDlar Surli Waluyo Ebet Rendi Nugraha Chebdra Arisandi Erawan

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Jatiroke 1 Abun 2 Eka Sutarya 3 Atang Setiawan 4 Rudi Supriadi 5 Arief Budiman 6 Very Vedian 7 Ahmad Hudaya 8 Usep Saepudin 9 Anto Surahman 10 Toni Fahrudin 11 Toto Mulyana 12 Teguh Pahruzi R 13 Taufik Budi Permana 14 Riki Ginanjar 15 Amo 16 Sulaiman 17 Dian Novarian 18 Muhammad Ruli

DHV, Deltares, MLD

STAF PPB PPB STAF PPB STAF PPB PPB STAF PPB STAF PPB STAF PPB

TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P

PPA B. Sdi. 1 PPA B. Sdi. 1 PPA B. Sdi. 2 PPA B. Sdi. 2 PPA B. Sdi. 2 PPA B. Sdi. 3 PPA B. Sdi. 3 PPA B. Sdi. 4 PPA B. Sdi. 4 PPA B. Sdi. 4 PPA B. Sdi. 5 PPA B. Sdi. 5 PPA B. Sdi. 5 PPA B. Sdi. 6 PPA B. Sdi. 6 PPA B. Sdi. 7 PPA B. Sdi. 7 PPA B. Sdi. 8 PPA B. Sdi. 8 PPA B. Kd. 1a PPA B. Kd. 1a PPA B. Kd. 1b PPA B. Kd. 1b PPA B. Kd. 1c PPA B. Kd. 1c PPA B. Kd. 2 PPA B. Kd. 3 PPA B. Kd. 4 PPA B. Kd. 4 PPA B. Tw. 1a PPA B. Tw. 1 PPA B. Tw. 2a PPA B. Tw. 2 PPA B. Tw. 2 PPA B. Kr. 1a PPA B. Kr. 2 Bendung Pawelutan Bendung Pawelutan Bendung Pawelutan Bendung Leuwinangka Bendung Leuwinangka Bendung Leuwinangka Bendung Salamdarma Bendung Salamdarma Bendung Salamdarma Bendung Cileluey Bendung Cileluey Bendung Cileluey Bendung Cileluey

PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PPA B. M.1 PPA B.M.2 PPA B.M.2 PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PS. Macan PPA B. Bd.1 PPA B. Bd.2

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ page 17 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140

2

3 TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P

4

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87

Aan Sukarta Rahmat Saefuloh Asep Saepul M. Yaya Aqua Abd. H Arip Hidayat Edi Setiawan Yaman Sugianto Hendi Sutaryat Mugni Labib Casta Imam Santoso Yana SDryana Asep Saepudin Ade Tarsim Dudi Daniawan Jajang Nurjaman Aan Supardi Ade Gunawan Nana Nawawi Iwan Permana Sutarwo Hendra Koswara Ano Dede Kusnadi Sofian Tarma Suryana Dulhanan Jumhur Surapang Sukendar Deni Ruskandi Wawan Hermawan Jaenuri Hendro Sugianto Arif Rahman Hakim R. Hendi Permana Husen Ependi Rojak Suryana Darlam Abdul Dayat Eka Kusnindar Sahyo Pranoto Wawan Wadianto Kusnandar Aep Sutrisno Ilman Sodikin Nurdin Suwandi Pendi Sukirman Samsudin Itam Nurjaman Calim CasSDta Ono Karsono Dzaenal Abidin Karlim Indra Maulana Iwan Samsudin Nanang Haryana Yusuf Iskandar Heri Kurnia Dhi Wijayana Roskandi Acu Mulyadi Andri Sopyan Irfan Indrawan M. Prayitno Adi Sumardi Anim Zaenal A Nuralim

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PPA B. Bd.3a PPA B. Bd.3 PPA B. Bd.4 PPA B. Bd.5 PPA B. Bd.6 PPA B. Bd.7 Ps. B.Bd.1-2 Ps. B.Bd.2-3 Ps. B.Bd.3-4 Ps. B.Bd.4-5 PPA B. M.3 PPA B. M.4a PPA B. M.4 PPA B. M.5 PPA B. M.6 PPA B. M.7 Ps. B.M.2-3 Ps. B.M.3-4 Ps. B.M.4-5 Ps. B.M.5-6 Ps. B.M.5-6 Ps. B.M.6-7 Ps. B.M.6-7 PPA B. Khi.1 PPA B. Khi.2 PPA B. Khi.3 PPA B. Khi.4 Ps.B.M.4-B.Khi.2 Ps.B.Khi.2-3 Ps.B.Khi.3-4 PPA B. Bi.1 PPA B. Bi.2 PPA B. Bi.3 Ps.B.M.7-B.Bi.1 Ps.B.Bi.1-2 PPA B. M.8c PPA B. M.8 PPA B. M.8 PPA B. M.9a PPA B. M.9a PPA B. M.9 PPA B. M.9 PPA B. Ki.1 PPA B. Ki.2 PPA B. Ks.1 PPA B. Ks.2 PPA B. Ks.3 PPA B. Ks.4 Ps.B.M.9-10 PPA B.M.10 (ss. Batang) Ps.B.M.10-B.Ba.1 PPA B. M.10 (ss. Jatiroke) PPA B. Jre.1b Ps.B.M.10-B.Jre.1a Ps.Jre.1a-1b PPA B. Awi.1 Ps.B.M.10-B.Awi.1 PPA B. Wa.1 Ps.B.M.10-B.Wa.1 Ps.B.M.9-10 PPA B. Jre. 1 PPA B. Dh. 1 PPA B. Dh. 2 PPA B. Dh. 3 PPA B. Dh. 4 Ps. B.Jre.1-2a PPA B. Ba.1 PPA B. Ba.2 PPA B. Ba.3

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

page 18 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165

2

4

Sarto Dedi Haryanto Gunawan Elan Suherlan Karyo Sunaryo Koko Trisnamawan Anwar Suwanda Narkidi Ruli Hendra P Karya Suherman Arsa Sopandi SaSDn SDharja Ali Usman Rano Karno Ernawan Dasro Ade Achmad Fari Suwanda Koko Okantri Dendih Arisandi Susanto Edi iskandar

3 TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P TP O&P PPB STAF PPB STAF PPB

PPA B. Ba.4 Ps.Ba.1-2 Ps.Ba.1-2 Ps.Ba.2-3 Ps.Ba.2-3 Ps.Ba.3-4 Ps.Ba.3-4 PPA B. Ku.1 PPA B. Tk.1 PPA B. Tk.2 PPA B. Kpl. 1 PPA B. Kpl. 2 PPA B. Kpl. 3 PPA B. Kpl. 4 PPA B. Kpl. 5 PPA B. Jre. 2 PPA B. Jre. 3 PPA B. Jre. 4 PPA B. Jre. 5 PPA B. Tg. 1 PPA B. Tg. 2 PPA B. Tg. 3 Bendung Macan Bendung Macan Bendung Macan

1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191

SEKSI PATROL A. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Bugis 1 Robertino 2 Robi Riyanto, A.md 3 Novalino, SE 4 Ardiansyah 5 Muhamad Ali 6 Mohamad Faruq 7 Dede Sulaeman 8 Ade Sulaeman 9 Dasan 10 Edi Junaedi 11 Rusmin Nuryadin 12 Mulyanto 13 Dalim 14 Nurkalim 15 Mulyadi 16 Cahyono Agus Supriyadi 17 Rahmat Nurdiansyah 18 Agus Komarudin 19 Sudarno 20 Budi Santoso 21 Alan Maulana 22 Anggun Pramadia 23 Nono Suharno 24 Aang Jaenudin 25 Agus Wahyu Adiyanto 26 Chaidir Anwar

Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Staff Ranting PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Bendung Salamdarma PPA. Induk Bugis PPA. Induk Bugis PPA. Induk Bugis PPA. Induk Bugis PPA. Induk Bugis PPA. Induk Bugis PPA. Induk Bugis PPA. Induk Bugis PPB. PPB PPB

Staff Urs. O&P Staff Urs. O&P Staff Urs. O&P Staff Urs. O&P Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Salamdarma Kej. Bugis Kej. Bugis Kej. Bugis Kej. Bugis Kej. Bugis Kej. Bugis Kej. Bugis Kej. Bugis Bd. Salamdarma Bd. Salamdarma Bd. Salamdarma

1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203

B. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Pusakanagara 1 Bawon Iwik 2 Deni Iskandar 3 Eko Rudiyanto 4 Adi Ariyanto 5 Karyo 6 Ujang Haerudin 7 Juhendi 8 Maman Surahman 9 Kuswadi 10 Agung Supriatna 11 Endang Candrawan 12 Iman Romansyah

V.

88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Staff Ranting Staff Ranting PPA. B. Pnk. 1 PPA. B. Pnk. 2 PPA. B. Pnk. 3 PPA. B. Pnk. 3 PPA. B. Wts. 1 PPA. B. Skn. 1 PPA. B. Skn. 2 PPA. B. Pnk. 4 PPA. B. Pnk. 4 - 5 PPA. B. Pnk. 5

Staff Ranting PSI. Pusakanagara Staff Ranting PSI. Pusakanagara PPA. B. Pnk. 1 PPA. B. Pnk. 2 PPA. B. Pnk. 3 PPA. B. Pnk. 3 PPA. B. Wts. 1 PPA. B. Skn. 1 PPA. B. Skn. 2 PPA. B. Pnk. 4 PPA. B. Pnk. 4 - 5 PPA. B. Pnk. 5

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

√ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ page 19 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239

2

3 PPA. B. Pnk. 6 PPA. B. Pnk. 7 PPA. B. Pak. 1 PPA. B. Pak. 2 PPA. B. Pnk. 8 PPA. B. Pnk. 9 PPA. B. Gp. 1 PPA. B. Crj. 2 PPA. B. Gr. 2 PPA. B. Gr. 3 PPA. B. Gr. 4 PPA. B. Rd. 1 PPA. B. Gr. 5 - 6 PPA. B. Gr. 6 - 7 PPA. B. Pnk. 10 PPA. B. Pnk. 11 PPA. B. Pnk. 12 PPA. B. Pnk. 13 PPA. B. Pnk. 14 PPA. B. Pnk. 15 PPA. B. Kr. 1 PPA. B. Kr. 2 PPA. B. Kr. 3 PPA. B. Kr. 4 PPA. B. Gp. 3 PPA. B. Gp. 4 PPA. B. Gp. 5 PPA. B. Ptb. 1 PPA. B. Prn. 2 PPA. B. Prn. 3 PPA. B. Prn. 4 PPA. B. Prn. 5 PPA. B. Prn. 6 PPA. B. Prn. 7 PPA. B. Prn. 5 - 6 PPA. B. Prn. 6 - 7

4 PPA. B. Pnk. 6 PPA. B. Pnk. 7 PPA. B. Pak. 1 PPA. B. Pak. 2 PPA. B. Pnk. 8 PPA. B. Pnk. 9 PPA. B. Gp. 1 PPA. B. Crj. 2 PPA. B. Gr. 2 PPA. B. Gr. 3 PPA. B. Gr. 4 PPA. B. Rd. 1 PPA. B. Gr. 5 - 6 PPA. B. Gr. 6 - 7 PPA. B. Pnk. 10 PPA. B. Pnk. 11 PPA. B. Pnk. 12 PPA. B. Pnk. 13 PPA. B. Pnk. 14 PPA. B. Pnk. 15 PPA. B. Kr. 1 PPA. B. Kr. 2 PPA. B. Kr. 3 PPA. B. Kr. 4 PPA. B. Gp. 3 PPA. B. Gp. 4 PPA. B. Gp. 5 PPA. B. Ptb. 1 PPA. B. Prn. 2 PPA. B. Prn. 3 PPA. B. Prn. 4 PPA. B. Prn. 5 PPA. B. Prn. 6 PPA. B. Prn. 7 PPA. B. Prn. 5 - 6 PPA. B. Prn. 6 -7

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

Karyono Dudy Agung Nurdiansyah Rahmat Hidayat Jalil Sucipto Kuswanto Eko Wiharto Muksinin Lili Miftah Maskun Ilyas Tunara Suherman Edi Logia Muslihin Tohidi Maman Sumartono Sodikin Marjuki Saputra Ahmad Amirudin Wartono Nanang Sobirin Hasikin Rusita Ade Supriatna Kendi Carsam Tofik. H, SPd. I Wawan Heryanto Ade Suheri Ralin Oyok Uhi Dasuhi Riki. A Agus Hidayat Tarmini Rangga. R

BBWS CITARUM 5

1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262

C. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Sukra 1 Sahudin 2 Waryono 3 Budianto 4 Komarudin 5 Willi Sugara 6 Sudiyono 7 Taryanto 8 Dedi Kiswanto 9 Rohidin 10 Moh. Ilham 11 Agung Lesmana 12 Herman Suherman 13 Ryan Ahmad Riyadi 14 Sukirno 15 Tata Suryana 16 Wahono 17 Indra Ermawan 18 Muhamad Rifki 19 Jaya Dwi Sasmita 20 Taufik Hidayat 21 Komara Alamsyah 22 Rokhmat 23 Carlim

Staff Ranting PSI. Sukra Staff Ranting PSI. Sukra PPA. B. Su. 1 PPA. B. Su. 2 PPA. B. Pnk. 1a PPA. B. Mkj. 1 PPA. B. Prn. 1a PPA. B. Su. 3 PPA. B. Gr. 1 PPA. B. Gr. 2a PPA. B. Su. 4 PPA. B. Su. 5 PPA. B. Bgr. 1 PPA. B. Su. 6 PPA. B. Su. 7 PPA. B. Su. 8 PPA. B. Lby. 1 PPA. B. Lby. 2 PPA. B. Lby. 3 PPA. B. Su. 9 PPA. B. Su. 10 PPA. B. Su. 11 PPA. B. Ug. 1

Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Kej. Lw. Malang Kej. Lw. Malang Kej. Lw. Malang Kej. Lw. Malang Kej. Lw. Malang Kej. Cilandak Kej. Cilandak Kej. Cilandak Kej. Cilandak Kej. Cilandak Kej. Cilandak Kej. Cilandak Kej. Sukra Kej. Sukra Kej. Sukra Kej. Sukra Kej. Sukra Kej. Ujung Gebang Kej. Ujung Gebang Kej. Ujung Gebang Kej. Ujung Gebang

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268

D. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Eretan 1 Suhara Boy Gunawan 2 Ade Khaerudin 3 Abdul Wahab 4 Ismail Marzuki 5 Agung Erawan 6 Radis Supriyanto

Staff Ranting PSI Anjatan Staff Ranting PSI Anjatan PPA. B. A. 1 PPA. B. St. 1 PPA. B. St. 2 PPA. B. A. 2

Staff Ranting Staff Ranting Kej. Kopyah Kej. Kopyah Kej. Kopyah Kej. Kopyah

√ √ √ √ √ √

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PJT II 8

page 20 of 22



NAMA

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

1 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309

2

3 PPA. B. A. 3 PPA. B. Pl. 1 PPA. B. Pl. 2 PPA. B. A. 4 PPA. B. Kc. 1 PPA. B. Bgl. 1 PPA. B. Bgl. 2 PPA. B. Bgl. 3 PPA. B. Bgl. 4 PPA. B. A. 5 PPA. B. A. 6 PPA. B. Mst. 1 PPA. B. Mst. 2 PPA. B. A. 7 PPA. B. A. 8 PPA. B. Ptr. 1 PPA. B. Ptr. 2 PPA. B. Ptr. 3 PPA. B. A. 9 PPA. B. Ui. 1 PPA. B. Ui. 2 PPA. B. A. 10 PPA. B. A. 11 PPA. B. Te. 1 PPA. B. E. 1 PPA. B. E. 2 PPA. B. E. 3 PPA. B. E. 4 PPA. B. Pnl. 1 PPA. B. Pnl. 2 PPA. B. E. 5 PPA. B. Ma. 1 PPA. B. E. 6 PPA. B. Jkt. 1 PPA. B. E. 7 PPA. B. Bpl. 1 PPA. B. E. 8 PPA. B. E. 9 PPA. B. E. 10 PPA. B. E. 11 PPA. B. E. 12

4

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Edi Efendi Sulaeman Erwinoto Supriyono Sutrisno Danesa Subandi Ahmad Pranaya Nurwijaya Aang Kunaefi Ardi Budiman Uci Sugiantoro Sukhari Cariman Nur Rohim Wahidin Adi Sucipto Saefudin Casmidi Ivan Rivansyah Yayan Firdiyansyah Nuradi Nurokhim Iwan Taka Karta Rosidi Warsono Tarwan Casmita Kusnadi Subakti Alim Hendrik Kurniawan Parnoto Darsiwan Ikwan Puryanto Aris Suwari Janu Rahmat Taufik Haryono Ali Mahfudin Wawan Kurniadi

Kej. Kopyah Kej. Kopyah Kej. Kopyah Kej. Anjatan Kej. Anjatan Kej. Anjatan Kej. Anjatan Kej. Anjatan Kej. Anjatan Kej. Anjatan Kej. Sumuradem Kej. Sumuradem Kej. Sumuradem Kej. Sumuradem Kej. Patrol Kej. Patrol Kej. Patrol Kej. Patrol Kej. Pilangsari Kej. Pilangsari Kej. Pilangsari Kej. Pilangsari Kej. Pilangsari Kej. Pilangsari Kej. Lempuyang Kej. Lempuyang Kej. Lempuyang Kej. Lempuyang Kej. Lempuyang Kej. Lempuyang Kej. Arjasari Kej. Arjasari Kej. Arjasari Kej. Arjasari Kej. Tulang Kacang Kej. Tulang Kacang Kej. Plawangan Kej. Plawangan Kej. Kertawinangun Kej. Kertawinangun Kej. Kertawinangun

BBWS CITARUM 5

DPSDA JABAR 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

PJT II 8

E. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Cipancuh 1310

1

Komarudin

Staff Ranting PSI Wd.Cipancuh Staff Ranting

1311

2

Andi Sukandi

Staff Ranting PSI Wd.Cipancuh Staff Ranting

1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Sunanto Dedi Herdiana Saeful Rahman Saroni Nursidin Karyo Endang Kelana Wijaya Naluri Sujati Jeje Permana Taryani Edi Susanto Hidayat Yusmana Edi Waskana Asep Kurniawan Nurdiansyah Fopilaya Maman Suparman Supari Hadi Purwanto Kamun Nada Mulyana Rano Aryanto

DHV, Deltares, MLD

PPA. Wd. Cipancuh PPA. Wd. Cipancuh PPA. Wd. Cipancuh PPA. B. Cp. 1 PPA. B. Cp. 2 PPA. B. Cp. 3 PPA. B. Cp. 4 PPA. B. Cp. 5 PPA. B. Skm. 1 PPA. B. Cp. 6 PPA. B. Bjt. 1 PPA. B. Bgs. 1 PPA. B. Sb. 1 PPA. B. Sb. 2 PPA. B. Sb. 3 PPA. B. Sb. 4 PPA. B. Sb. 5 PPA. B. Sb. 6 PPA. B. Nb. 1 PPA. B. Nb. 2 PPA. B. Nb. 3

Kej. Wd.Cipancuh Kej. Wd.Cipancuh Kej. Wd.Cipancuh Kej. Wd.Cipancuh Kej. Sukamulya Kej. Sukamulya Kej. Sukamulya Kej. Sukamulya Kej. Sukamulya Kej. Kertanegara Kej. Kertanegara Kej. Kertanegara Kej. Sarjambe Kej. Sarjambe Kej. Sarjambe Kej. Sarjambe Kej. Sarjambe Kej. Sarjambe Kej. Gantar Kej. Gantar Kej. Gantar

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

page 21 of 22



NO. 1

2 F. Pengamat Sungai & Irigasi Gabuswetan 1 Roni Adedi 1333 2 Enang Sailendra 1334 3 Ramli 1335 4 Eman Nurahman 1336 5 Sukirno 1337 6 Hartono 1338 7 Warman 1339 8 Ilham Iman 1340 9 Supriyanto 1341 10 Yani Taryani 1342 11 Tatang Indra Nurdiyanto 1343 12 Ari Gunawan 1344 13 Edi Wahyudin 1345 14 Iis Yanto 1346 15 Asep Wijaya 1347 16 Nuryadi 1348 17 Supardi 1349 18 Warih 1350 19 Khaerudin 1351 20 Karnadi 1352 21 Rendi Antoro 1353 22 Wardinah 1354 23 Casman 1355 24 Sonjaya 1356 25 Sarita 1357 26 Endang Sucipto 1358 27 Hosirin Handoko 1359 28 Carita 1360 29 Sutikno 1361 30 J a y a 1362 31 Abdul Adi 1363 32 Toha Hariri 1364 33 Wawan Indrawan 1365 34 Bayu Aji 1366 35 Adi Sukana 1367 36 Cahyo Wibowo 1368 37 Caryadi 1369 38 Carhadi 1370 39 Kirno Septianto 1371 40 Hasan 1372 41 Tardi Budiman 1373 42 Ade Sunanto 1374 43 Yoyon Maryono 1375 44 Camin 1376 45 Dartam 1377 46 Karuniawan 1378 47 Setiawan 1379 48 Ari Hanggoro 1380 49 Munir 1381 50 Endi Gunawan 1382 51 Samudra Jaya 1383 52 Rusta 1384 53 Calim 1385 54 Dasmin 1386 55 Didi Suryadi 1387 56 Dadi Hermayandi 1388 57 Rustono 1389 58 Sugiyanto 1390 TOTAL

POSISI

LOKASI KERJA

3

4

Staff Ranting PSI Gabuswetan PPA. B. Khr. 2 PPA. B. Khr. 3 PPA. B. Khr. 4a PPA. B. Khr. 4 PPA. B. Khr. 5 PPA. B. Khr. 6a PPA. B. Khr. 6 PPA. B. Bs. 1 PPA. B. Bs. 2 PPA. B. Bs. 3 PPA. B. Khr. 7 PPA. B. Khr. 8 PPA. B. Khr. 9 PPA. B. Tdg. 1 PPA. B. Tdg. 2 PPA. B. Tdg. 3 PPA. B. Tdg. 4 PPA. B. Tdg. 5 PPA. B. Tdg. 6 PPA. B. Khr. 10 PPA. B. Khr. 11 PPA. B. Khr. 12a PPA. B. Khr. 12 PPA. B. Gs. 1 PPA. B. Mgl. 1 PPA. B. Cr. 1a PPA. B. Cr. 1 PPA. B. Cr. 2 PPA. B. Cr. 3 PPA. B. Cr. 4 PPA. B. Cr. 5 PPA. B. Khr. 13 PPA. B. Khr. 14a PPA. B. Khr. 14 PPA. B. KA. 1 PPA. B. KA. 2 PPA. B. KA. 3 PPA. B. KA. 4 PPA. B. Prt. 1 PPA. B. Prt. 2 PPA. B. Prt. 3 PPA. B. Bend. Pedati PPA. B. Bend. Pedati PPA. B. Pdt. 1 PPA. B. Kp. 1 PPA. B. Kp. 2 PPA. B. Rong. 1 PPA. B. Bend. Lalanang PPA. B. Bend. Lalanang PPA. B. LL. 1 PPA. B. LL. 2 PPA. B. LL. 3 PPA. B. LL. 4 PPA. B. LL. 5a PPA. B. LL. 5 PPA. B. Rong. 2 PPA. B. Rong. 3

BBWS CITARUM 5

Staff Ranting Kej. Wanguk Kej. Wanguk Kej. Wanguk Kej. Wanguk Kej. Wanguk Kej. Wanguk Kej. Cipedang Kej. Cipedang Kej. Cipedang Kej. Cipedang Kej. Lw.Semut Kej. Lw.Semut Kej. Lw.Semut Kej. Lw.Semut Kej. Lw.Semut Kej. Margamulya Kej. Margamulya Kej. Margamulya Kej. Margamulya Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Gabus Kagok Kej. Karang Asem Kej. Karang Asem Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Gabus Wetan Kej. Sukamelang Kej. Sukamelang Kej. Sukamelang Kej. Sukamelang Kej. Sukamelang Kej. Sukamelang Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet Kej. Sukaslamet 50

DPSDA JABAR 6

PJT II 8

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 1238

102

PIHAK KESATU BBWS Citarum

PIHAK KEDUA DPSDA Prov Jabar

PIHAK KETIGA Perum jasa Tirta II


(IR. DEDDI MULYADI)

IR.EDDY A DJAJADIREJA DIPL HE

DHV, Deltares, MLD

page 22 of 22


Annex J Gap Analysis between Requirements for Rencana and Deliverables TA 7189

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Annex J – Gap Analysisi between Requirements for Rencana and Deliverables TA 7189


ANNEX J ‐ GAP ANALYSIS between REQUIREMENTS FOR RENCANA/MASTERPLAN and Q / DELIVERABLES TA 7189 Package B REQUIREMENTS • Activities (see flow chart in slide 2) Basic Design (see slide 3) • Basic Design (see slide 3) • Feasibility: economic, technical, environmental, social (slide 4)

GAP ANALYSIS • Difference between requirements and what can be met under TA 7189 Package B contract (see slides 5 and 6), if this contract is terminated in December 2012. t ti t i t di D b 2012

DHV, Deltares, MLD

1



POLA Document of Water Resources Management

PHASE I WAT TER RESOURCES INVENTORY

SKENARIO, STRATEGY AND OPERATIONAL POLICY Strategy Selection

Collecting Water Resources Data and Information

Choose by Water Resources Coordination Team in the River Basin Choosen Strategy Data Analysis Matrix concept of Physical and non-physical measures Technical Team Consultation

Not done by consultants

PCM 1 PCM 1 Results Discussion by Water Resources Coordination Team with TKPSDA Basic Design Analysis and Physical and Non-Physical Pre-Feasibility Measures Content Substance featured with: 1.Basic Design: •Basic Design of Non-Physical Measures; •Basic Design of Physical Measures; 2.Pre-feasibility covered: Economic, Social, Technical and Environmental Pre-feasibility

PHASE II COMPILATION

Draft Rencana Concept of Water Recources Management (Matrix of Physical and Non-Physical Measures) Technical Team Consultation PCM 2 PCM 2 Results Discussion by Water Resources Coordination Team with TKPSDA

Not done by consultants

Draft Rencana of Water Resources Management Public Announcement for Draft Rencana of Water Resources Management

Objection

Yes

Reviewing& Explanation/Clarification p

PHASE III RATIFICATION

No

DHV, Deltares, MLD

Ratification Process RENCANA OF WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

2



Basic Design REQUIREMENTS FOR RENCANA /MASTERPLAN • Basic B i design d i for f non‐physical h i l measures should h ld cover: type of activity, location, responsible institute and time of execution; • Basic design for physical measures should cover: location, typical layout and main di dimensions, i availability il bilit off structures t t material, t i l dump‐site location and or source of landfill, responsible institute and time of execution.

Economic Pre‐Feasibility Economic Analysis for feasibility calculation are using Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) analysis by using Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) analysis.

Technical Pre‐Feasibility Especially for Physical measures (Water Resources Structures) Technical Pre‐Feasibility carried out by doing review to topography, geology and geotechnical condition that allowed for water resources structures to be build.

Environmental Pre‐Feasibility According to regulation number 32 year of 2009, about environmental management and protection in activity that related to regional development it requires Strategic Environment Studies (KLHS) are series of systematical , comprehensive and participative analysis to ensure that sustainable development principal has been integrated and become a basic in regional development and/or policy, plans, and/or program.

Social Pre‐Feasibility Social Pre‐Feasibility emphasis on community opinion regarding community preparedness on activities plan.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

3



Difference between what is required and what can be met under TA 7189 ACTIVITIES • •

Consultants will not assist in discussions with TKPSDA after PCM 1 (not possible because presently TKPSDA 6 Ci is inactive, and TKPSDA in each ibl b tl TKPSDA 6 Ci i i ti d TKPSDA i h river basin not yet established); Consultants will not assist in discussion with TKPSDA after PCM 2 (not in ToR and not possible because TKPSDA in each river basin not yet established);

BASIC DESIGN • •

Most of basic design for non‐physic measures will be covered: type of activity, location and time execution, will be delivered; Most of basic design for physical measures will location typical layout Most of basic design for physical measures will location, typical layout and essential dimensions (such as length and/or discharge). Layout and type estimation and structures size, availability of structures material, dump‐site location and or source of landfill, will not be delivered (not in ToR)

FEASIBILITY • Economic pre‐feasibility for infrastructure measures, will be estimated. Benefits are mostly economic (not financial). Priorities for water resources utilization aspect are based on least cost. • Technical pre‐feasibility will be mainly based on topography (from Digital Elevation Model) and hydrological conditions (is available), geology and Elevation Model) and hydrological conditions (is available), geology and geotechnical (location has been overlaid with geological maps showing fault and type of soil layers formation), but not on topographical surveys and/or geotechnical investigations (specific: bore hole is not available) • Environmental pre‐feasibility based on full KLHS (Strategic Environment Studies) is not possible, because not in ToR and KLHS authority belongs to other institution (in 3 river basin area, only Citarum River Basin who has Preliminary KLHS for Cekungan Bandung). Aspects of KLHS have been assessed, such as overlay potential infrastructure with existing land use and RTRW;; • Social pre‐feasibility concerning acceptance of the community on acceptation of the plans has been assessed during two Public Consultation Meetings (PCM). More detailed discussions and confirmations at each location with FGD (Forum Group Discussion), is still not possible.

DHV, Deltares, MLD

4

10 QUARTERLY REPORT ADB IN THE 6 CIS RIVER BASIN TERRITORY - PACKAGE B. May - August 2012

Recommend Documents