LAMPIRAN Lampiran1. Kuesioner Penelitian KUESIONER PENELITIAN Petunjuk: berilah tandasilangatau lingkaran pada jawabanyangandapilih. Keterangan:
I.
STS
: Sangat Tidak Setuju
TS
: Tidak Setuju
S
: Setuju
SS
: Sangat Setuju
SSS
: Sangat Sangat Setuju
KUALITAS SISTEMINFORMASI Pertanyaan di bawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi Saudara/I terhadap
sisteminformasi yangdigunakandalamperusahaantempatSaudara/i Mohon
pilih
bekerja.
dan Beri tanda check list atau centang (√) nomor
yang
Saudara/i anggap paling tepat mencerminkanpersepsiSaudara/i. No.
Pertanyaan
1.
Sistem informasi yang saya gunakan mampu meningkatkan kapasitas pemrosesandatasecarasignifikan. Sisteminformasitesebutdapatdijalankan padakomputerlainselainkomputeryang digunakan saat ini. Sisteminformasitersebutdapatdigunakan dalam lingkungan organisasi lain tanpa harus banyak modifikasilagi. Sisteminformasitersebutmemilikisistem securitysehinggapemakaiyang tidak berhak, tidak dapat mengakses datayang terdapat didadalamnya.
2.
3.
4.
STS 1
TS 2
S 3
SS 4
SSS 5
68 Universitas Sumatera Utara
No. 5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Pertanyaan
STS 1
TS 2
S 3
SS 4
SSS 5
Tersedia fasilitas untuk mengoreksi data (fungsi help) pada software akuntasi tersebut. Kesalahan (error) yang terjadi mudah dikoreksidandiidentifikasidalamsoftware tersebut. Setiapbagiandarisitemmemuatinformasi yang cukup untuk membantu saya memahami fungsi dari bagian tersebut. Meskipun pemakai telah lama tidak menggunakan sistem informasi tersebut, akan mudah untuk menggunakannyalagi. Sisteminformasitersebutmudahdipelajari oleh orang yang baru pertama kali menggunakannya. Sisteminformasitersebutdapatdigunakan untuk berbagai perusahaan yang karakteristiknyaberbeda. Sistem informasi tersebut memiliki kecepatanaksesyangoptimal.
II. KUALITASINFORMASI Pertanyaan di bawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi Saudara/i terhadap informasiyang
dihasilkansisteminformasiyang
digunakandalamperusahaan
tempatSaudara/ibekerja.Mohonpilih dan Beri tanda check list atau centang (√) nomoryang Saudara/ianggap palingtepat mencerminkan persepsi Saudara/i. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Pertanyaan
STS 1
TS 2
S 3
SS 4
SSS 5
Informasiyangdihasilkansisteminformasi tersebutakurat. Informasiyangdihasilkansisteminformasi tersebut dapat dipercaya. Informasiyangdihasilkansisteminformasi tersebuttepat waktu. Informasiyangdihasilkansisteminformasi tersebutrelevan. Informasiyangdihasilkansisteminformasi tersebut mudah dipahami.
69 Universitas Sumatera Utara
6.
Informasiyangdihasilkansisteminformasi tersebutbersifat detail dan benar.
III. DAMPAK PENGGUNAAN SOFTWARE AKUNTANSI Pertanyaan/pernyataan dibawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi saudara/i men genai dampak penggunaan software akuntansi yang digunakan dalam perusahaan tempat Saudara/I bekerja. Mohon pilih dan Beri tanda check list atau centang (√) nomor yang Saudara/i anggap paling tepat mencerminkan persepsi Saudara/i terhadap dampak dari penggunaan software akuntansi di perusahaan Saudara/i.
No.
Pertanyaan
1.
Software akuntansi yang digunakan, membantu saya menyelesaikan tugas dengan lebih cepat. Penggunaan software akuntansi dapat meningkatkan kinerja saya. Software akuntansi yang digunakan mampu meningkatkan produktivitas kerja saya. Software akuntansi yang digunakan mampu meningkatkan efektivitas tugas saya. Penggunaan software akuntansi mempermudah saya dalam menyelesaikan pekerjaan Secara keseluruhan, software akuntansi yang digunakan bermanfaat dalam pekerjaan saya.
2. 3. 4. 5.
6.
STS 1
TS 2
S 3
SS 4
SSS 5
70 Universitas Sumatera Utara
IV. KEPUASANPENGGUNA SISTEMINFORMASI Pertanyaandibawah
iniberkaitan
denganseberapatingkatkepuasan
Saudara/i dalam menggunakan sistem informasi untuk melaksanakan tugas di perusahaan tempat Saudara/ibekerja. Mohonpilih dan lingkarinomoryang Saudara/i anggappalingtepat mencerminkan persepsi Saudara/i.
No. 1.
2.
3.
4. 5. 6. 7.
8.
9. 10. 11. 12.
Pertanyaan
STS 1
TS 2
S 3
SS 4
SSS 5
Sisteminformasiyangdigunakanmampu memberikan informasi seperti yang saya butuhkan. Isiinformasiyangdihasilkanolehsistem informasi yang digunakan memang saya butuhkan. Sistem informasi yang digunakan menghasilkan laporan yang tepat seperti yangsayabutuhkan. Sistem informasi yang digunakan menghasilkaninformasiyang cukup. Sistem nformasi yang digunakan bersifat akurat (program/sistemnya). Sayamerasapuasdengantingkatakurasi sistem informasiyangdigunakan. Sisteminformasiyangdigunakanmampu memberikan informasi sesuai dengan formatyangdibutuhkan. Sisteminformasiyangdigunakanmampu menghasilkan informasi yang dapat dipahami denganjelas. Sistem informasi yang saya gunakan bersifat user friendly. Sistem informasi tersebut mudah digunakan. Saya dapat memperoleh informasi yang sayabutuhkan tepat waktu. Sisteminformasiyangdigunakanmampu menghasilkan informasi yang bersifat mutakhir/ up to date.
71 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2. Lembar Penelitian
72 Universitas Sumatera Utara
73 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 3. Data Mentah 1. Variabel Kualitas SistemInformasi (X1) Pertanyaan No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 3 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 5
4 3 3 3 3 1 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 4
4 3 5 2 5 4 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 3 5
4 5 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 3 4
4 5 5 3 3 4 3 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 2
4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 3
4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3
4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 4
1 0
1
Total
1 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3
42 39 42 35 41 40 41 34 41 42 45 44 42 40 41 39 38 40 40 39 43 41 39 38 40 41 43 44 40 40
74 Universitas Sumatera Utara
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 3 4
4 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 3 4
4 2 2 4 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 1
2 2 3 2 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4
3 2 4 2 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4
2 4 2 4 2 4 4 3 4 4 3 3
2 4 2 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 3
2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4
2 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3
4 4 3 2 3 3 4 3 4 4 2 3
3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 2 3
32 34 34 33 34 42 44 41 44 43 35 36
2. Variabel Kualitas Informasi (X2) No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4
2 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3
Pertanyaan 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3
6 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
Total
20 21 23 24 20 23 22 23 22 20 23 19 22 23 22 22 24 22 22
75 Universitas Sumatera Utara
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4
3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4
5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3
6 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3
21 20 21 18 22 20 20 18 22 21 20 20 19 20 21 20 21 18 23 21 20 19 21
3. Variabel Perceived Usefulness (I) No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 3
2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3
Pertanyaan 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 3 3
Total
19 21 22 23 23 24 19 18
76 Universitas Sumatera Utara
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 2 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3
4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3
3 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 2 4 3 3 4 3 3 3
4 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 3 3
3 3 3 3 4 3 4 2 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 2
22 20 23 20 23 21 21 19 22 23 24 22 18 18 22 18 20 21 21 19 22 19 20 18 21 19 18 22 21 22 23 23 19 18
77 Universitas Sumatera Utara
4. Variabel Kepuasan PenggunaSistemInformasi(Y) Pertanyaan No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4
4 2 4 4 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4
3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 5 4 3 3 4 4 4 2 3
3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3
4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3
4 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4
4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2
1 0
1 1
5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 1
1
Total
1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3
4 2 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3
46 43 47 50 43 46 46 45 47 47 46 44 44 46 49 46 48 49 45 48 42 42 43 45 46 43 44 43 45 46 41 37 78
Universitas Sumatera Utara
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
3 2 3 3 3 3 4 3 1 3
2 4 1 4 4 3 4 3 1 2
2 3 3 2 3 2 3 4 3 2
4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3
2 3 2 4 3 3 4 2 3 3
3 2 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3
4 4 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 2
4 4 2 4 4 4 4 5 4 4
5 2 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5
4 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 2
4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3
41 36 37 45 45 40 45 45 37 36
79 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4. Hasil Output SPSS Uji Validitas X1 Correlations P1 P1
Pearson Correlation
P2 1
Sig. (2-tailed) N P2
TOTAL
.029
.228
.057
-.083
.191
.038
-.013
.115
.225
.197
.336*
.856
.146
.720
.601
.227
.810
.937
.468
.152
.211
.030
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
.407**
-.047
-.056
.018
.046
.055
.000
.359*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.856
.951
.109
.008
.769
.724
.908
.772
.729
1.000
.020
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.228
.010
1
.129
-.082
.132
.077
-.164
.006
.030
.019
.318*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.146
.951
.414
.606
.404
.628
.300
.970
.852
.907
.040
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
1
**
.295
.138
.272
.151
.296
.204
.709**
42
Pearson Correlation
.057
.251
.129
Sig. (2-tailed)
.720
.109
.414
.004
.058
.384
.081
.339
.057
.196
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
-.083
**
-.082
**
1
.248
.102
.184
.116
-.061
-.038
.515**
.601
.008
.606
.004
.114
.521
.244
.463
.700
.809
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
1
*
.325
.000
-.084
.256
.152
.530** .000
Pearson Correlation
.407
.433
.433
42
Pearson Correlation
.191
-.047
.132
.295
.248
Sig. (2-tailed)
.227
.769
.404
.058
.114
.036
1.000
.595
.101
.338
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.038
-.056
.077
.138
.102
.325*
1
.294
.498**
-.015
-.027
.473**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.810
.724
.628
.384
.521
.036
.059
.001
.927
.867
.002
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
-.013
.018
-.164
.272
.184
.000
.294
1
.400**
.022
.000
.389*
.937
.908
.300
.081
.244
1.000
.059
.009
.891
1.000
.011
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.115
.046
.006
.151
.116
-.084
.498**
.400**
1
.054
.131
.466**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.468
.772
.970
.339
.463
.595
.001
.009
.733
.408
.002
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.225
.055
.030
.296
-.061
.256
-.015
.022
.054
1
.455**
.418**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.152
.729
.852
.057
.700
.101
.927
.891
.733
.002
.006
Pearson Correlation N
N
N P11
P11
.251
Sig. (2-tailed)
P10
P10
42
N
P9
P9
.010
N
P8
P8
1
N
P7
P7
42
Sig. (2-tailed) P6
P6
42
N P5
P5
.029
N P4
P4
Pearson Correlation N
P3
P3
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.197
.000
.019
.204
-.038
.152
-.027
.000
.131
.455**
1
.364*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.211
1.000
.907
.196
.809
.338
.867
1.000
.408
.002
N TOTA Pearson Correlation L Sig. (2-tailed) N
.018
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
.336*
.359*
.318*
.709**
.515**
.530**
.473**
.389*
.466**
.418**
.364*
1
.030
.020
.040
.000
.000
.000
.002
.011
.002
.006
.018
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
80 Universitas Sumatera Utara
42
Uji Reliabilitas X1 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items .603
11
Item-Total Statistics Cronbach's Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item Deleted
P1
35.88
10.693
.205
.592
P2
35.74
10.393
.180
.597
P3
36.26
10.442
.078
.629
P4
35.67
7.984
.531
.500
P5
35.48
9.377
.309
.569
P6
36.00
9.268
.324
.565
P7
36.29
10.014
.323
.570
P8
36.24
10.332
.228
.587
P9
36.38
9.803
.280
.576
P10
36.40
10.296
.273
.580
P11
36.33
10.520
.219
.589
81 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Uji Validitas X2 Correlations P1 P1
P2
.200
.107
.308
.042
1.000
.204
.500
.002
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.161
1
.282
.253
.253
-.012
Sig. (2-tailed)
.308
.071
.106
.105
.938
.000 42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.315
*
.282
1
.297
.266
.220
Sig. (2-tailed)
.042
.071
.056
.088
.161
Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)
.460
.554
.673
**
**
**
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
.000
.253
.297
1
.387
*
.304
1.000
.106
.056
.011
.050
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
*
1
.150
N Pearson Correlation
.200
.253
.266
.387
Sig. (2-tailed)
.204
.105
.088
.011
N P6
TOTAL
.000
N
P5
P6
.315
1
N
P4
P5
.161
Pearson Correlation
N
P3
P4 *
Sig. (2-tailed)
P2
P3
.344
42 .669
.611
**
**
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.107
-.012
.220
.304
.150
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.500
.938
.161
.050
.344
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
**
**
**
**
**
**
1
N TOTAL Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)
.460
.554
.673
.669
.611
**
.000
.538
.002
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
N
42 .538
42
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Uji Reliabilitas X2 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items .612
6
Item-Total Statistics Cronbach's Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item Deleted
82 Universitas Sumatera Utara
P1
17.19
2.060
.240
.605
P2
17.71
1.868
.294
.589
P3
17.29
1.721
.466
.518
P4
17.60
1.661
.426
.531
P5
17.86
1.882
.424
.543
P6
17.48
1.865
.250
.612
Uji Validitas I Correlations P1 P1
Pearson Correlation
P2
P2
P3
.040
.128
.472
1.000
.506
.007
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
*
1
.167
.012
-.025
.180
.291
.940
.873
.255
.002
42
42
42
42
42
1
**
**
.304
.000
.050
.040 42 .167
Sig. (2-tailed)
.128
.291
Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N
P6
42 .239
N P5
.319
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N
TOTAL Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N
TOTAL
-.106
Sig. (2-tailed)
Pearson Correlation
P6
.000
.319
N P4
P5
-.114
Pearson Correlation
N
P4
.239
1
Sig. (2-tailed) N
P3 *
.490
.001
42
42
-.114
.012
.472
.940
.001
42
42
42
.000
-.025
**
.295
1.000
.873
.000
.058
.559
42
42
42
**
1
.295
.490
.559
42
.457
.781
**
**
**
.000
42 .424
**
42 .603
**
.058
.005
.000
42
42
42
1
**
.455
.002
42
42 .304
.506
.255
.050
.005
.002
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
**
**
**
**
**
**
1
.457
.781
.603
42 1
.000
.180
**
**
**
42
.424
42
.644
-.106
.408
42
.408
.455
.644
42 .623
**
.000
.623
.007
.002
.000
.000
.000
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Uji Reliabilitas I Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
83 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items .605
6
Item-Total Statistics Cronbach's Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item Deleted
P1
17.07
2.995
.092
.668
P2
17.31
2.951
.211
.607
P3
17.17
2.337
.637
.439
P4
17.36
2.577
.347
.557
P5
17.17
2.533
.420
.525
P6
17.62
2.632
.415
.531
Uji Validitas Y 84 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Correlations P1 P1
Pearson Correlation
P2 1
Sig. (2-tailed) N P2
Pearson Correlation
.294
Sig. (2-tailed)
.059
P10
P11
P12
TOTAL
-.027
-.071
.273
.329*
.457**
.059
.688
.693
.202
.203
.431
.143
.867
.653
.081
.034
.002
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
.255
.129
**
-.057
.174
*
.369
.250
-.214
-.121
.201
.502** .001
1
.396
.009
.720
.269
.016
.110
.173
.446
.202
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.064
.255
1
.115
.209
-.030
.438**
.416**
.252
.004
.142
.194
.513**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.688
.103
.470
.183
.850
.004
.006
.107
.979
.369
.219
.001
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.063
.129
.115
1
-.148
.195
.076
.170
.190
-.054
.299
.023
.389*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.693
.416
.470
.349
.217
.632
.281
.229
.736
.054
.883
.011
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.201
.396**
.209
-.148
1
.134
.004
.255
.246
.029
.055
.101
.438**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.202
.009
.183
.349
.397
.979
.104
.117
.858
.731
.526
.004
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.201
-.057
-.030
.195
.134
1
-.165
.005
.164
.308*
.423**
-.051
.396**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.203
.720
.850
.217
.397
.295
.976
.300
.047
.005
.748
.009
Pearson Correlation N
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
-.125
.174
.438**
.076
.004
-.165
1
.155
.379*
.146
.265
-.087
.384*
.431
.269
.004
.632
.979
.295
.326
.013
.355
.090
.584
.012
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Pearson Correlation
.230
.369*
.416**
.170
.255
.005
.155
1
.258
-.103
.207
.094
.551**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.143
.016
.006
.281
.104
.976
.326
.099
.516
.189
.552
.000
N P9
P9
.230
42
Sig. (2-tailed) P8
P8
-.125
.416
N P7
P7
.201
42
N P6
P6
.201
.103
N P5
P5
.063
42
N P4
P4
.064
42
N P3
42
P3
.294
Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
-.027
.250
.252
.190
.246
.164
.379*
.258
1
.357*
.134
.057
.598**
.867
.110
.107
.229
.117
.300
.013
.099
.020
.399
.721
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
*
*
1
.289
.070
.348*
P10 Pearson Correlation
-.071
-.214
.004
-.054
.029
.308
.146
-.103
.357
Sig. (2-tailed)
.653
.173
.979
.736
.858
.047
.355
.516
.020
.064
.661
.024
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
**
.265
.207
.134
.289
1
.060
.555**
N P11 Pearson Correlation
.273
-.121
.142
.299
.055
Sig. (2-tailed)
.081
.446
.369
.054
.731
.005
.090
.189
.399
.064
.705
.000
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
P12 Pearson Correlation
*
.329
.201
.194
.023
.101
-.051
-.087
.094
.057
.070
.060
1
.350*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.034
.202
.219
.883
.526
.748
.584
.552
.721
.661
.705
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
.457**
.502**
.513**
.389*
.438**
.396**
.384*
.551**
.598**
.348*
.555**
.350*
1
.002
.001
.001
.011
.004
.009
.012
.000
.000
.024
.000
.023
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
N
N TOT Pearson Correlation AL Sig. (2-tailed) N
.423
.023
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Uji Reliabilitas Y
85 Universitas Sumatera Utara
42
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items .647
12
Item-Total Statistics Cronbach's Scale Mean if
Scale Variance if Corrected Item-
Item Deleted
Item Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item Deleted
P1
40.67
10.618
.281
.629
P2
40.81
10.158
.299
.627
P3
40.95
10.778
.393
.614
P4
40.24
10.966
.207
.642
P5
40.83
10.972
.298
.626
P6
40.24
11.113
.248
.634
P7
39.90
11.259
.252
.634
P8
40.24
10.283
.402
.607
P9
39.86
10.028
.455
.596
P10
39.71
11.038
.124
.664
P11
40.38
10.144
.395
.607
P12
40.43
11.324
.204
.640
Statistik Deskriptif Descriptive Statistics N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Kualitas Sistem Informasi
42
32
45
39.67
3.398
Kualitas Informasi
42
18
24
21.02
1.569
Preceived Usefulness
42
18
24
20.74
1.888
Kepuasan Pengguna
42
36
50
44.02
3.516
Valid N (listwise)
42
Uji Normalitas 86 Universitas Sumatera Utara
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Unstandardized Residual N
42
Normal Parameters
a,,b
Mean
.0000000
Std. Deviation Most Extreme Differences
2.58214776
Absolute
.071
Positive
.054
Negative
-.071
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
.457
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.985
a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data.
Uji Koefisien Determinan b
Model Summary
Model 1
R .679
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
R Square a
.461
.418
2.682
a. Predictors: (Constant), Preceived Usefulness, Kualitas Informasi, Kualitas Sistem Informasi b. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Pengguna
Uji Stimultan F b
ANOVA Model 1
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
Regression
233.609
3
77.870
Residual
273.367
38
7.194
Total
506.976
41
F
Sig.
10.824
.000
a
a. Predictors: (Constant), Preceived Usefulness, Kualitas Informasi, Kualitas Sistem Informasi b. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Pengguna
87 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Uji Parsial T Dan Uji Multikolinearitas Coefficients
Model 1 (Constant)
a
Unstandardized
Standardized
Collinearity
Coefficients
Coefficients
Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
t
Sig.
Tolerance
VIF
1.156
7.688
.150
.881
Kualitas Sistem Informasi
.406
.133
.392 3.049
.004
.859
1.165
Kualitas Informasi
.807
.281
.360 2.869
.007
.901
1.110
Preceived Usefulness
.473
.249
.254 1.897
.065
.791
1.264
a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Pengguna
Uji Normalitas Grafik
88 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Uji Heteroskedastisitas
89 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Uji Analisis Regresi Linear Berganda Persamaan I Coefficients
Model 1
a
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
(Constant)
Std. Error 1.156
7.688
Kualitas Sistem Informasi
.406
.133
Kualitas Informasi
.807
Preceived Usefulness
.473
Beta
t
Sig. .150
.881
.392
3.049
.004
.281
.360
2.869
.007
.249
.254
1.897
.065
a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Pengguna
Uji Analisis Regresi Linear Berganda Persamaan II b
Model Summary
Model 1
R
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
R Square .457
a
.209
.168
1.721
a. Predictors: (Constant), Kualitas Informasi, Kualitas Sistem Informasi b. Dependent Variable: Preceived Usefulness
b
ANOVA Model 1
Regression
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
30.548
2
15.274
Residual
115.571
39
2.963
Total
146.119
41
F 5.154
Sig. .010
a
a. Predictors: (Constant), Kualitas Informasi, Kualitas Sistem Informasi b. Dependent Variable: Preceived Usefulness
Coefficients
a
90 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Model 1
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B (Constant)
Std. Error 5.392
4.858
.200
.079
.353
.171
Kualitas Sistem
Beta
t
Sig.
1.110
.274
.360
2.527
.016
.293
2.057
.046
Informasi Kualitas Informasi
a. Dependent Variable: Preceived Usefulness
Analisis Jalur KSIPersamaan 1 Model Summary
Model 1
R
R Square
.351
a
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.123
.101
1.790
a. Predictors: (Constant), Kualitas Sistem Informasi
Coefficients
a
Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B
(Constant) Kualitas Sistem Informasi
Coefficients
Std. Error 13.000
3.275
.195
.082
Beta
t
.351
Sig. 3.970
.000
2.371
.023
a. Dependent Variable: Preceived Usefulness
Persamaan 2 Model Summary
Model 1
R .586
R Square a
.344
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate .310
2.920
a. Predictors: (Constant), Preceived Usefulness, Kualitas Sistem Informasi
91 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Coefficients
a
Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B (Constant)
Coefficients
Std. Error
Beta
15.656
6.309
Kualitas Sistem Informasi
.351
.143
Preceived Usefulness
.697
.258
t
Sig.
2.482
.017
.339
2.446
.019
.374
2.703
.010
a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Pengguna
Analisis Jalur KI Persamaan 1 Model Summary
Model 1
R .420
R Square a
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.176
.156
3.231
a. Predictors: (Constant), Kualitas Informasi
Coefficients
a
Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B (Constant) Kualitas Informasi
Coefficients
Std. Error 24.249
6.779
.941
.322
Beta
t
.420
Sig.
3.577
.001
2.925
.006
a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Pengguna
Persamaan 2 Model Summary
Model 1
R .573
R Square a
.329
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate .294
2.954
a. Predictors: (Constant), Preceived Usefulness, Kualitas Informasi
92 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Coefficients
a
Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B (Constant)
Std. Error
13.928
7.099
Kualitas Informasi
.683
.306
Preceived Usefulness
.759
.255
Coefficients Beta
t
Sig.
1.962
.057
.305
2.230
.032
.407
2.979
.005
a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Pengguna
93 Universitas Sumatera Utara
