DAFTAR PUSTAKA Aleksandrova, L. N. 1967. Organomineral humic acid derivates and methods of studying them. Paper read at a conference on methods of studying humus. Cornmising II of the All-Union Society of Soil Scientists. February 8, 1967. Alexander, M. 1977. Introduction to soil microbiology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York. Ambak, K., 2.Abu-Bakar, dan T. Tadano. 1991. Effect of liming and micronutrient application on the growth and occurrence of sterility in maize and tomato plants in Malaysian deep peat soil. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. 37 (4) : 689 698.
Andriesse, J. P. 1974. Tropical peats in South East Asia. Department of Agnculture Research of the Royal Tropical Institute. Communication 63. Amsterdam. 63p.
. 1988. Nature and management of tropical peat soil. FA0 Soils Bulletin 5:s. Roma. . 1992. Constraints and opportunities for alternative use options of tropical peatland. pp: 1- 6. In: Tropical peat, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tropical Peatland. MARDI, Malaysia.
Black, C. A 1965. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Am. Soc. Agron. Inc. Publ. Wisconsin. USA. 1582 p. Blakemore, L. C., P. L. Searle and 3.K. Daly. 1987. Methods for chemical analysis of soils. NZ Soil Bureau ScientificReport No. 80. New Zealand. 103 p. Bloom, 1981. Phosphorus adsorption by an aluminum peat complex. Soil Sci. Soc.
-
Am. J. 45: 267 272.
Bohn, H. L., B. L. McNeal and G. A. O'Connor. 1979. Soil chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. New York. Cannel, R. Q . and I. M. Lynch. 1984. Possible adverse effects of decomposing crop residues on plant growth. In: IRRI. Organic matter and rice. IRRI. Los Banos. Philippines.
Chandramohan, D., D. Purushotmahan and R. Kothandaraman. 1973. Soil phenolics and plant growth inhibition. Plant and Soil. 39: 303 - 308. De Datta, K. 1981. Principles and Practices of Rice Production. John W i and Sons. Inc. New York. 618 p. Driessen, P. M. 1978. Peat soils. pp: 763 - 779. In: IRRI. Soil and rice. IRRI. Los Banos. Philippines.
. and H. Suhardjo. 1976. On the defective grain formation of sawah rice on peat. Soil Res. Inst. Bull. 3: 20 - 44. Bogor. . and M. Soepraptohardjo. 1974. Soil agricultural expansion in
-
Indonesia. Bull. 1: 1 63. Soil Res. Inst. Bogor. Foth, D.H. and B. G. Ellis. 1988. Soil fertility. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 212 p. Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2" edition. A Wiley-Interscience Publications. New York. 680 p. Guenzi, W. D. and T. M. McCalla. 1966. Phenolic acids in oats, wheat, sorghum, and corn residues and their phytotoxicity. Agron. J. 58: 303 - 304.
Halim, A. 1987. Pengaruh pencampuran tanah mineral dan basa dengan tanah gambut pedalaman Kalimantan Tengah dalam budidaya tanaman kedelai. Disertasi. Fakultas Pascasarjana, IPB. Bogor. 322 p. Hardjowigeno, S. 1993. Klasifikasi Tanah dan Pedogenesis. Akademika Pressindo. Jakarta. 274 p. and A. Rachim. 1987. Suitabiity of peat soils in Sumatera for agricultural development. Paper presented on tropical peat and peatlands for development, International Peat Society Symposium, Yogyakarta, 9 - 14 February 1987. Hartley, R. D. and D. C. Whitehead. 1984. Phenolic acids in soil and their influence of plant growth and soil microbid processes. pp: 109 149. In: D. Vaughan and R. E. Malcolm (4.). Soil organic matter and biological activity. Martiis NijhotVDR W. Junk Publisher. Lancaster.
-
Hotlzclaw, K. M.. D. A. Keech, A. L. Page, G. Sposito, T. 1. Ganje and N. B. Ball. 1978. Trace metal distributions among the humic acids, the filvic acids, and the precipitable fractions extracted with NaOH from sewage sludges. J. Environ. Qual. 7(1):271 - 275. Institut Pertanian Bogor. 1969a. Laporan survai di daerah persawahan pasang surut Propinsi Riau, Jambi dan Sumatera Selatan. Institut Pertanian BogorDepartemen Pekerjaan Umum. Bogor.
. 1969b. Catatan rapat kerja proyek pembukaan persawahan pasang surut. Proyek Pembukaan Persawahan Pasang Surut, Departernen Pekerjaan Umum. Bandung. Ismunadji. M and G. Soepardi. 1984. Peat soils and crop production. pp : 488 - 502. In: IRRI. Organic matter and rice. IRRI. Los Banos. Philippines. Jones, J. B., B. Wolf, and H. A. Mills. 1991. Plant analysis handbook: a practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. Micro-macro Publ. Inc. Georgia. Kanapathy, K. 1972. Copper requirement and residual effect with maize on a peat soil. Mal. Agric. J. 48: 249 - 263.
. 1975. Factors in the utilization of peat soils in peninsular Malaysia. Proc. Third MEAN Soil Conference, Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia. Katase, T. 1981a. The diierent forms in which pcoumaric acid exists in peat soil. Soil Sci. 131: 271 - 275. . 1981b. The different forms in whichp-hydroxybemic, vanillic, pcoumaric and ferulic acids in peat soil. Soil Sci. 132: 436 - 443. . 1981c. Distribution of different forms of phydroxybenzoic, vanillic, pcoumaric and ferulic acid in forest soil. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. 27 : 365 371.
-
. 1981d. Stereoisomerization of p-coumaric and fenilic acids during fractionation of humic substances and their distribution in peat soils. Org. Geochem. 8: 41 46.
-
Kononova. M. M. 1968. Transformation of organic matter and their relation to soil f d t y . Sov. Soil. Sci. (8): 1047 - 1056.
Koswara, 0. 1973. Potensi dan pemanfaatan daerah pasang surut : suatu kasus di Sumatera. Seminar Pembangunan Fakultas Pertanian, IPB Badan Pengendali B i ,Departemen Pertanian.
-
Krishna, G. and S. K. Ranjhan. 1980. Laboratory manual for nutrition research. Vikas Publishing House PVT Ltd. New Delhi. 134 p. Kussow, W. R. 1971. Introduction to soil chemistry. Soil fertility project. FapertaIPB. Bogor. 101 p. Kuwatsuka, S. and H. Shindo. 1973. Behavior of phenolic substances in the decaying process of plants. I. Identification and quantitative determination on phenolic acids in rice straw and its decayed product by gas chromatography. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. 19: 219 - 227. Leiwakabessy, F. M. 1978. Sifat lahan yang tersedia pada daerah transmigrasi. Seminar pemantapan usaha-usaha pembangunan di daerah transmigrasi oleh JTKI-PPSM. Lindsay, W. L. 1979. Chemical equilibria in soils. A Wiley - Interscience Publication. John Wiley and Sons. New York. Mathur ,S. P. and M. P. Levesque. 1983. The effects of using copper for mitigating Histosol subsidence on: 2. The distribution of Cu, Mn, Zn, and Fe in an organic soil, mineral sublayers and their mixtures in the context of setting a. threshold of phytotoxic soil copper. Soil Sci. 135 (3): 166 176.
-
Mattingly, G. E. G. 1985. Labile phosphate in soils. In: Y. K. Soon (ed.). Soil nutrients availability. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. New York. McKinzie, W. E. 1974. Criteria used in taxonomy to classify organic soil. pp: 1 10. In: E. C. D i e r . Histosols. Their characteristic, classification, and use. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Special Publication Series 6. Miuer, M. H. 1979. Contribution of nitrogen and phospholus on subsurface drainage water !kom intensively cropped mineral an organic soils on Ontario. J. Environ. Qual. 8: 42 - 48. Miller, R W. and R L. Donahue. 1990. Soils. An introduction to soils and plant growth. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey. 768 p.
Morita, H. 1975. Polyphenols in the lime water extractives of peat. Soil Sci. 120 (2): 112- 116. . 1981. Changes in phenolic composition of a peat soil due to cultivation. Soil Sci. 131 :30-40.
Morley, R. J. 1981. Development and vegetation dynamics of lowland ombrogenous peat swamp in Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia. J. Biogeography 8: 383 - 404. Mortland, M. M. and A. R. Wolcott. 1965. Sorption of inorganic nitrogen compound by soil materials. In: W. V. Bartholomew, and F. E. Clark (eds.). Soil nitrogen. Agron. 10. Am. Soc. Agron. Publ. Madison. Murali, V. and L. A. G. Aylmore. 1983. Competitive adsorption during solute transport in soils. 2. Simulations of competitive adsorption. Soil Sci. 135 (4): 203 - 213. Naganuma, K., and M. Okazaki. 1992. Surface charge and adsorption characteristics of copper and zinc on peat soils. . In: K. Kyuma, P. Vijarnsom, and A. Zakaria (4s.). Coastal lowland ecosystems in Southern Thailand and Malaysia. Showado-Printing Co., Skyoh. Kyoto. Nasoetion, I., Sudarsono dan G. Soperadi. 1977. Penelitian retensi ammonium oieh tanah gambut Delta Upang dalam keadaan tergenang. Team Tanah, Fakultas Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. Patrick, Z. A. 1971. Phytotoxic substance associated with the decomposition in soil of plant residues. Soil Sci. 111: 13 - 18. Polak, B. 1975. Character and occurrence of peat deposits in the Malaysian tropics. In: G. J. Barstra, and W. A. Casparie (eds.). Modem Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia. Balkema, Rotterdam. Prasetyo, T. B. 1996. Perilah asam-asam organik meracun pada tanah gambut yang diberi garam Na dan beberapa unsur d u o dalam kaitannya dengan hasil padi. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. Pusat Penelitian Tanah. 1981. Hasil pengukuran planimetri dari peta tanah bagan Indonesia (1972). Pusat Penelitian Tanah. Bogor.
Rachim, A. 1995. Penggunaan kation-kation polivalen dalam kaitannya dengan ketersediaan fosfat untuk meningkatkan produksi jagung pada tanah gambut. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
. , A. Sutandi, S Anwar dan B. Nugroho. 1991. Alternatif perbaikan kesuburan tanah gambut tebal. 3. Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 1:72-78. Radjagukguk, B. 1991. Utilization and management of peatlands in Indonesia for agriculture and forestry. In: Tropical peat, Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Tropical Peatland. MARDI, Malaysia.
. 1997. Peat soil of Indonesia: Location, classification, and problems for sustainability. In: J. 0 . Rieley and S. E. Page (Eds.). pp: 45 - 54. Biodiversity and sustainabiiity of tropical peat and peatlands. Proceedings of the International Symposium on biodiversity, environmental importance and sustainability of tropical peat and peatlands, Palangka Raya, Central Kal'lmantan 4 - 8 September 1999. Samara Publishing Ltd. Cardigan. UK. Rund, R. C. 1984. Fertilizers. pp : 8 - 37. In: Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc. Virginia, USA. Sabiham, S. 1988. Studies on Peat in the coastal plains of Sumatera and Bomw. Part I: Physiography and geomorphology of the coastal plains. Tonan Ajia Kenkyu (Southeast Asian Studies). 26 (3): 307 - 335.
. 1996. Prospek pengelolaan lahan gambut untuk meningkatkan produksi beras nasional. Makalah disampaikan pa& Rapat Keja ah& Rektor BKS PTN Wiayah Barat XVII di Universitas Palangka Raya, tanggal 7 JUN 1996. Salampak. 1987. Pencampuran tanah mineral bersulfat masam dengan tanah gambut tebal, pencucian dan pengapuran terhadap penrbahan beberapa sifat kimia tanah. Skripsi S1. Jurusan Tanah, Fakultas Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
. 1993. Studi asam fen01 tanah gambut pedalaman dari Berengbengkel pada keadaan anaerob. Tesis S2. Program Pascasarjana, institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. Saragih, E. S. 1996. Pengendalian asam-asam organik merscun dengan penambahan Fe @I) pada tanah gambut dari Jambi, Sumatera. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Schnitzer, M. 1969. Reaction between fklvic acid, a soil humic compound and inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. SOC.Am. Proc. 33:75-81. . 1986. Binding of humic substances by soil mineral colloids. pp : 77
-
102. In: P. M. Huang and M. Schnitzer (ed.). Interaction of soil minerals with natural organics and microbes. SSSA Special Publication Number 17. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc. Madison.
., and S. I. M. Skinner. 1967. Organo-metallic interaction in soils: 7. Stability constants of pb2', N?', Soil Sci. 103 (4):247-252.
co2', ca2' and ~g"-fklvic acid complexes.
. And E. H. Hansen. 1970. Organo-metdlic interaction in soils: 8. An Evaluation of methods for the determination of stability constants of metalllvvic acids complexes. Soil Sci. 109 (6):333-340.
Senesi, N. 1994. Spectroscopic studies of metal ion humic substance complexation in soil. In: 15" World Congress of Soil Sci. Acapulco. Mexico. Shindo, H. and S. Kuwatsuka. 1975. Behavior of phenolic substances in the decaying process of plants. 111. Degradation pathway of phenolics acids. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. 21 (3) : 227 - 238. Soekardi, M. and A. Hidayat. 1988. Extent and distribution of peat soils of Indonesia. Third Meeting Cooperative Research on Problem Soils. CRIFC. , Bogor. Soepardi, G. 1983. Sifat dan ciri tanah. Jurusan Tanah, Fakultas Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. Soepraptohardjo, M and P. M. Driessen. 1976. The lowland peats of Indonesia, a challenge for the h r e . ATA 106. Bull. 3: 11-19. Soil Res. Inst. Bogor. and Ismangun. 1976. Classification of red soils in Indonesia by the Soil Research Institute. Pp: 15 24. In: P. Buunnan (ed.). Red soils in Indonesia. Centre for ABLiculture Publisihing and Documentation. Wageningen.
-
Soil Survey Staff. 1975. Soil taxonomy a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Soil Consemation, USDk Washington D. C. 750p.
Stevenson, F. J. 1982. Humus chemistty. Genesis, composition, reactions. John Wdey and Sons Inc. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore. 443p.
. and A. Fitch. 1986. Reactions with organic matter. In: J. F. Loneragan, A. D. Robson, and R. D. Graham (eds.) Copper in Soil and Plants. Academic Press. Sydney. and M. S. Brar. 1993. Stability constants of Cu(I1)humate complexes: Comparison of select models. Soil Sci. 155 (2):77-91. Subagjo, H., M. Sudjadi, E. Suryatna, and J. Dai. 1990. Wet soils of Indonesia. Pp:248-259. In: J. M. Kimble (4.). Proceed of the VIIItbInternational Soil Correlation Meeting (VIII ISCOM): Characterization, classitication, and utilization of wet soils. USDA. Soils Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln. NE. Suhardjo, H. and I. P. G. Widjaja-Adhi. 1976. Chemical characteristics of the upper 30 cms of peat soils from Riau. ATA 106. Bull. 3:74-92. Soil Res. Inst. Bogor. Tadano, T., K. Yonebayashi, and N. Saito. 1992. Effect of phenolic acids on the growth and occurrence of sterility in crop plants. pp: 358 - 369. In: K. Kyuma, P. Vijarnsorn, and A. Zakaria (4s.). Coastal lowland ecosystems in Southern Thailand and Malaysia. Showado-Printing Co., Skyoku. Kyoto. ., K. Ambak, K. Yonebayashi, and W. Pantanahiran. 1991. Occurrence of phenolic compounds and aluminum toxicity in tropical peat soils. In: Tropical peat, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tropical Peatland. MARDI, Malaysia.
Takijima, Y. 1964a. Studies on organic acids in paddy field soils with reference to their inhibitory effects on the growth of rice plants. Part 1. Growth inhibiting action of organic acids and absorption and decomposition of them by soils. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. lO(5): 14 21.
-
. 1964b. Studies on organic acids in paddy field soils 4 t h reference to their inhibitory effects on the growth of rice plants. Part 2. Relations between production of organic acids in waterlogged soils and the root growth inhibition. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. 10(5): 22 - 29.
Tan, K. H. 1986. Degradation of soil minerals by organic acids. In: P. M. Huang and M. Schnitzer (4.). Interaction of soil minerals with natural organics and microbes. SSSA Sljecial Publication Number 17. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc. Madison. ,
1993. Principles of soil chemistry. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. 362p.
T i Institut Pertanian Bogor. 1974. Laporan survai produktivitas tanah dan pengembangan pertanian daerah Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah. Bogor.
. 1976. Survai dan pemetaan tanah daerah Air Saleh, Sumatera Selatan. Proyek Pembukaan Persawahan Pasang Surut (P4S), Ditjen Pengairan Dep. Pekerjaan Umum clan Tenaga Listrik - Institut Pertanian Bogor. , 1986. Gambut pedalaman untuk lahan pertanian. Fakultas Pertanian, IPB bekerjasama dengan Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan Propinsi Dati I Kalimantan Tengah. Bogor.
. 1993. Studi kelayakan pilot proyek Pangkoh. Kerjasama antara IPB dan Bappeda Propinsi Tigkat I Kalimantan Tengah. Bogor. Tisdale, S. L., W. L. Nelson and J. D. Beaton. 1985. Soil fertility and fertilizers. 4* ed. The Macmillan Publ. Co. New York. 694p. Tsutsuki, K. 1984. Volatile products and low-molecular-weight products of the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter. pp: 329-343. International Rice Research Institute, Soil Organic Matter.
. and F. N. Ponnamperuma. 1987. Behavior of anaerobic decomposition products in submerged soils. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. 3(1): 13 33.
-
. and R. Kondo. 1995. Lignin-derived phenolic compounds in different types of peat profiles in Hokkaido. Japan. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutr. 41 (3):515527. Wang, T. S. C., T. T. Yang and T. T. Chang. 1967. Soil phenolic acids as plant growth inhibitors. Soil Sci. 103: 239 - 246.
Whitehead, D. C., H. Dibbs and R. D. Hartley. 1981. Extractan pH and the release of phenolic compounds from soils, plant roots and leaf litter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13:343-348. Widjaja-Adhi, I. P. G. 1986. Pengelolaan lahan rawa pasang surut dan lebak. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, V(1): 1 - 9. . 1988. Physical and chemical characteristic of peat soil of Indonesia. IARD J. 10: 59 - 64. . 1991. Development of a deep tropical peatland for perennial crops. pp:380-384. . In: Tropical peat, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tropical Peatland. MARDI, Malaysia.
., J. A. Silva, and R. L. Fox. 1990. Assessment of external P requirement of maize on Paleudults and Eutrustox. Pemberitaan Penelitian Tanah dan Pupuk. 9: 14-20. ., K. Nugroho, D. Ardi dan A. S. Karma. 1992. Sumberdaya lahan rawa: Potensi, keterbatasan dan pemdaatan. Dalmn S. Partohardjono dan M. Syam (penyunting). Pengembangan terpadu: Pertanian lahan rawa pasang surut dan lebak. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Departernen Pertanian.
Wild, A. 1990. The relation of phosphate by soil: A review. J. Soil Sci. 1: 221 237.
Yonebayashi, K., M. Okazaki, N. Kaneko and S. Funakawa. 1997. Tropical peatland soil ecosystems in Southeast Asia: Their characterisation and sustainable utilisation. In: J. 0.Rieley and S. E. Page (EMS.). pp: 103 111. Biodiversity and sustainability of tropical peat and peatlands. Proceedings of the International Symvosium on biodiversity. environmental im~ortance and Sustainabiity df kopical peat and p&tlands, Palangka GYa,Central Kalimantan 4 - 8 September 1999. Samara Publishing Ltd. Cardigan. UK.
-
LAMPIRAN -LAMPIRAN
Tabel Lampiran 1. Deskripsi Profil Tanah Garnbut Samuda (Pasang Surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) b k a s i (I) : Handil Sohe, Samuda - Sampit Penggunaan lahan : TegalanfSwah Vegetasi : Paku-pakuan Kedalaman bahan organ&tanah : 80 m Fisiografi : Endapan marin Kedalaman reduksi total :z 8 O m Air tanah : 2cm Kedalaman gley : 81 cm Kedalaman (cm) Dekomposisi Deskripsi 0-20 Sapik Bahan saprik, hitam k d a t a n 7.5 YR 3 0 20 - 60
Hemik
Bahan hemik, hitam kecoklatan 5 YR U2
60 - 80
Fibrik
Bahan fibrik, hitam kecoklatan 2.5 YR 2/1
> 80
-
Bahan miner& olive keabu-abuan 5 Y 5R
Lokasi (11) Penggunaan lahan Vegetasi Air m a h Fisiografi Kedalaman (m) 0-33
: Sampit
: Tegaian : Paku-pakuan Kedalaman bahan organik tanah : 180 an : Icm Kedalaman reduksi total : 190an : Endapan marin payau Kedalaman gley : 19Ocm Dekomposisi Deskripsi Saprik Bahan saprik, hitam kecoklatan 7.5 YR Ul
33 - 53
Hemik
Bahan hemik, wklat tua kemerahan 5 YR 2fZ
53 - 180
Fibri
Bahan fibrii, hitam kecoktatan 5 YR 312
180-190
Bahan gambut, hitam kacolatan 2.5 YR 2/2 tercampur dengan bahan mineral olive keabu-abuan 5 Y 512
> 190
Masi (111) P e n p a a n Iahan Vegetasi Xi tanah Kedalaman gley Kedalaman (cm) 0-60 60- 125 125 -275 275 - 510
Bahan mineral, olive keabu-abuan 5 Y 511
: Berengbengkel, Palangka Raya : Tegalan
: Paku-pakuan :5 0 m
Dekanposisi Saprik Fibrik-Hemik Hemik F~hik
Kcdalaman bahan organik tanah Kedalaman reduksi total
: 5 10 cm
.-
-psi Bahan saprik, hitam kecoklatan 7.5 YR 2/I Bahan fibrik hingga hanik, hitam kecoklatan 7.5 YR 311 Bahan hmik, hitam kecoklafan 5 YR 3/2 Bahan fibrik, hitam kecdtlatan 5 YR 2/2
Tabek Lampian 2. Metode Analisis Beberapa Sifat Kimia Tanah
pH meter (Black, 1965)
Kjeldahl (Black, 1965) a.Gravimebi (Blakmore, Searle, Daly, 1987)
b. Walkley dan Black (Black, 1965) Bray I (Black, 1965) I NNI&OAc pH 7.0 (Black, 1965) a. Pengabuan (Blakmore el d.,1987) b. 25 % HCI (Black, 1965)
a. I NNH,OAc pH 4.8 (Black, 1965) b. 1 NNELOAc pH 7.0 (Black, 1%5)
Z ha-basa1KTK a. 0.5N HCl (Am*
Abu Bakar, clan Tadano, 1991)
b. EDTA (Black, 1965) a. Pengabuan (Blakemore et al., 1987)
b. 25 % HCI (Black, 1965)
Tabel Larnpuan 3. Kriteria Pdan
Kandungan Umur clan KernasamanTanah
Daerah pasang Surut
Tikat
Ciri tanah Rendah
Sedang
Tinggi
I Cu ekstraksi 0.05 N HCl (ppm)
< 9.0
9.0 - 20.0
> 20.0
1
Zn ekstraksi 0.05 N HCI (ppm)
< 2.5
2.5 - 10.0
> 10.0
Mn ekstraksi0.05 N HCl (ppm)
< 5.0
5.0 - 20.0
> 20.0
I
A1 -dd (me11 00g)
< 2.0
> 10.0
KTK (md100 g)
< 10.0
KB (%)
< 30.0
- 10.0 10.0 - 20.0 20.0 - 50.0
I
2.0
> 20.0 Y
50
pH H 2 0
< 4.5
4.5 - 5.0 Masam sangat kuat
Masam ekstrim Sum ber: Rachim (1 996).
1
5.1 - 5.5. Masam kuat
5.6 - 6.0 Masam sedang
6.1 - 6.5 Agak
masam
6.6 - 7.3 netral
Tabel Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisis Sifat Kimia Bahan Amelioran dari PunduKasongan. Kalirnantan Tengah No
Analisis
Metode
1.
pHHzO(1:l)
pH meter
5.45
2.
C-organik (YO)
Walkley & Black
0.14
3.
N-total (%)
Kjeldhal
0.03
4.
P - t d i a (ppm)
Bray 1
0.40
5.
Basa-basa (me1100g) Ca Mg K Na Total
N m 0 A c pH 7 N NH40Ac pH 7 N m 0 A c pH 7 N NH40Ac pH 7
0.25 0.1 1 0.06 0.09 0.5 1
6.
KTK (me1100g)
N m 0 A c pH 7
7.73
7.
Kejenuhan basa (?A)
8.
A1 (me/100g)
9.
Unsurmikro (ppm) Fe Cu
Zn Mn 10.
Metal oksida Fez03 A1203
11. Basa oksida (%) CaO Mi30 K20 12. Tekstur (YO) Pasir Debu Liat
Tanah Mineral
6.60
N KC1
4.82
EDTA EDTA EDTA EDTA
4.96 0.28 1.12 0.36
Puslitbang Tek. Mineral Puslitbang Tek. Mineral HCI 25% HCI 25% HC125% Pipet Pipet Pipet
22.06 23.80 0.15 1.43 028 1.64 52.34 46.02
Tabel Lampiran 5. Persamaan Linier Langmuir dan Parameter-parameter Erapan ~ e %
Lukasi dan Tingkat Kematangan Gambut
Persamaan Linear Langmuir c/(x/m)
=
Erapan Maksimum
llbb) + (llb) c
I
(Irg/g)
(melg)
K~~~~ r-angmuir
Nilai CIQ
(~g/ml)
Pasrne Surut (Sarnudr) Saprik
C/(x/m)
=
0.00020 + 4.74E - 05 C
0.994
21077.55
1.1292
0.2419
4.13
Hernik
C/(x/m)
=
0.00029 + 4.40E - 05 C
0.994
22758.15
1.2192
0.1505
6.64
Fibrik
C/(x/m)
=
0.00028 + 5.94E - 05 C
0.999
16845.05
0.9024
0.21 14
4.73
C/(x/m) = 0.00006 + 5.70E - 05 C
0.998
17695.46
0.9480
0.9914
1.01
'
Tnnsisi (Samdt) Saprik
Hemik
C/(x/m)
0.00055 + 5.70E - 05 C
0.994
17593.29
0.9425
0.1041
9.61
Fibrik
C/(x/m) = 0.00023 + 6.56E - 05 C
0.986
15238.08
0.8163
0.0282
35.44
=
Pedalaman (Berenpbenzkel) Saprik
C/(x/m)
0.00010 + 7.50E - 04 C
0.996
13266.42
0.7107
0.7752
1.29
Hemik
C/(x/m) = 0.00085 + 1.09E - 04 C
0.997
9176.99
0.4916
0.1278
7.83
Fibrik
C/(x/m)
0.00160 + 1.16E-05 C
0.996
8608.22
0.4612
0.0727
13.76
=
=
-
Tabel Lampian 6. Data Pengukuran Keseimbangan ~ e "
-
Gambut Samuda (pasane surut) Fibrik
-
Gambut Samuda (Pasane surut) Hemik
Tabel Lampiran 6 . (lanjutan) Gnmbut Samuda Wasan= surut) - Saprik
Gnmbut Sampit (Transisi)
- Fibrik
Tabel Lampian 6 . (lanjutan) Gambut Sampit (Ttmsisi) - Hemik
-
Gambut S a m ~ i(Transisi) t Saprik
Tabel Lampiran 6 . (lanjutan) Gambut Berenebellekel (Pedalaman) - Fibrik
-
Gambut Berengbcngkel (Pedalaman) Hemik
Tabel Lampiran 7. Data Hasil Pengukuran pH pada Berbagai Perlakuan Dosis ~ e ~ +
N,,. 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Dosis Fe3' @~m) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1200 1400 1600
Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut) Hemik Saprik Fibrik 3.40 3.40 3.45 3.25 3.30 3.30 3.25 3.15 3.05 3.15 3.15 3.00 3.15 3.05 3.10 3.05 2.95 3.05 3.00 2.90 3.00 2.95 2.85 2.95 2.90 2.85 2.85 2.80 2.75 2.80 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.60 2.65 2.60 2.60 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.45 2.50 2.45
Gambut Sampit (Transisi) Hemik Saprik Fibrik 3.45 3.70 3.45 3.10 3.25 3.20 3.05 3.25 3.05 3.00 3.05 3.00 3.00 2.95 3.05 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.90 2.85 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.75 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.65 2.70 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.50 2.45
Gambut Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) Hemik Fibrii Saprik 2.85 3.05 3.05 2.80 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.90 2.85 2.75 3.05 2.95 2.70 2.85 2.85 2.70 2.85 2.80 2.70 2.85 2.85 2.60 2.85 2.80 2.60 2.80 2.85 2.50 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.45 2.75 2.45 2.75 2.75 2.40 2.70 2.70 2.45 2.65 2.70 2.35 2.55 2.65 2.35 2.60 2.55 2.35 2.55 2.50 2.30 2.45 2.45
Tabel Lampiran 8. Efek Penurunan pH dan Pembebasan & (mM) ke dalam Larutan Tanah Akibat Penambahan Kation ~ e ' *
Hemik Fibrik Rata-rara
3.05
2.45
3.05
2.45
2.66 2.66
2.98
2.40
2.97
00
2
Tabel Lampiran 9. Perhitungan Efek Pembebasan H' dan Hidrolisis ~ e "dalam Larutan Tanah Gambut
Tabel Lampiran 9. (lanjutan) Reaksi Hidrolisis ~ e *(Lindsay. 1979):
Contoh perhitungan untuk Gambut Pasang Surut (Samuda) - Hemik : [Fe] - total dalam larutan = 244.85 mgll = 4.3723 mM (diasumsikan terdiri dari spesiesspesies Fe3+. F~(oH)~*.dan Fe(0H)Z'; spesies-spesies lain diabaikan mengacu pada Lindsay (1979); ~ l a pH i larutan keseimbangan pa& dosis tertinggi adalah 2.50 sehingga konsentrasi ion H'=
3.1623 mM.
Selanjutnya dengan menggunakan persamaan (1) diperoleh :
[ ~ e * ] = 15,85 [Fe(OH);] Akhirnya diperoleh perbandingan antara spesies-spesies ion Fe : 3
Konsentrasi [H? yang berasal dari hidrokisis ~ e yang ~ ' dihitung dari persamaan (1) dan di atas adalah sebesar 1.1912 m M
dalam larutankeseimbangan.
+
0.1888 mM atau sebesar 43.64 % dari jumiah
[Hfl
Tabel Lampiran 10. Kelarutan Fe dari Tanah Mineral yang di Inkubasi dalam Tanah Gambut (pdg)
Tabel Lampiran 1 1 . Hasil Analisis &berapa &vat Asam Fenolat dalam Tanah -but Samuda (Pasang surut), Sampit (Transisi), dm bengbengkel (Pedalaman) di Laboratdm pada Periakuan Pembaian Bahan Amelioran
Tabel Lampian 12. Konsentrasi Beberapa Derivat Asam Fenolat dalam Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) pada Perlakuan FeCb.6H20 di Laboratorium
Tabel Lampiran 12.
(lanjutan)
Tabel Lampiran 12. (lanjutan)
2
Tabel Lampiran 13. Hasil Analisis Beberaps Sifat Kmia Tanah Gambut akibat Perlakuan ~emberian Bahan Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang sum),Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengkngkel (Pedalaman)
Palakw
Ulangan
pH
MO
1 2 3 1
MI
2 3
MZ
2 3
1
1
M3 M4
2 3 1 1
3
3.31 3.69 3.65 3.52 3.47 3.45 3.31 3.39 3.25 3.46 3.23 2.92 3.04 3.12 3.16
Cs
K
fi
Na
KTK
(md100g) 5.93 4.93 4.80 8.12 7.80 8.63 11.06 9.93 10.14 9.89 10.11 10.23 11.52 12.19 11.92
(me/IOO g) 0.82 0.47 0.68 0.94 0.58 1.12 1.59 1.78 1.59 1.25 1.89 0.72 1.41 1.67 2.17
(md100g) 5.80 4.01 422 6.05 5.10 4.35 6.88 6.56 725 6.13 6.37 5.98 7.13 6.50 7.36
(mJIW g) 0.70 0.87 0.83 0.82 0.76 0.73 0.87 0.82 0.79 0.91 0.69 0.89 0.87 0.83 0.82
(md100g) 153.47 153.31 146.17 154.30 127.66 135.58 122.92 129.31 142.14 110.03 9921 127.41 124.77 116.73 101.69
KB (%)
P(PP@
8.37 6.78 7.04 10.10 11.36 10.98 16.51 14.59 13.97 16.78 19.26 14.60 17.10 18.34 21.34
24.58 32.88 31.39 29.75 28.75 31.78 31.46 29.70 35.90 37.09 34.12 32.19 36.11 36.72 34.59
A1 OM/~OO g) 2.91 2.70 2.96 3.57 3.74 2.40 2.79 2.74 3.04 2.99 3.04 3.61 3 .05 2.98 3.92
pe(~Pm)
12.23 14.76 17.11 26.34 25.62 30.57 52.45 55.58 36.40 72.67 63.97 65.05 89.15 65.47 80.16
-
PsrlaLusn
Ulaogan
Ca pH
1
MO
M1 MZ
2 3 1 2 3 1 2
3 1 M3
2
3 1
M4
Z 3
3.18 3.47 3.79 3.48 3.13 3.09 3.10 3.21 3.43 3.25 3.10 2.96 2.86 3.10 3.18
(mcllOO8) 5.54 5.74 4.41 6.78 6.51 6.01 8.62 7.30 7.92 8.62 8.71 9.22 8.97 9.14 6.78
K (dlWg) 0.38 0.51 0.40 0.61 0.83 1.52 0.75 0.92 1.06 1.64 1.78 1.93 1.86 1.58 1.92
Mg (mcl100g) 3.72 3.68 4.87 5.80 5.38 6.11 5.38 6.03 5.66 6.35 6.52 7.19 7.41 7.52 5.93
Na (mellW g) 0.76 0.70 0.72 0.71 0.77 0.80 0.68 0.83 0.76 0.87 0.70 0.63 0.74 0.80 0.76
KTK (mdl0Og) 173.34 176.12 174.58 152.65 165.71 150.36 125.03 129.07 126.08 122.83 113.71 107.76 120.18 118.86 116.85
KB(%)
p(mm)
6.00 6.04 5.96 9.11 8.14 9.60 12.34 11.68 12.21 14.23 15.57 17.60 15.79 16.02 13.17
9.59 9.85 L1.51 13.21 12.48 12.02 10.60 13.23 13.33 14.41 12.74 15.32 13.27 11.53 15.16
A]
(rnd100g) 1.78 1.53 1.40 1.82 1.80 175 1.83 1.68 2.01 2.59 2.55 2.71 2.62 2.86 3.91
Kebrangan: MO, MI, M2. M3 dan MI berfuruf-funrladalah p c r l a h n bahnn amelioron dengan fakamn sefara 0,2.5,5, 7.5, don 10 % dai erapan mahimum Fe.
Rm) 6.63 827 626 23.21 25.48 27.93 43.80 46.18 45.57 5427 50.89 48.26 61.31 58.62 50.38
Tabel Lampiran 14. Hasil Analisis Unsur P dan Fe pada Tanah Gambut dalam Kolom Tanah dan Air Cucian setelah Penambahan Bahan Amelioran dan Inkubasi P
Tabel Lampiran 14. (lanjutan) 1
Fe &lam Aii mian (m)
20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50
45.01 38.43 41.00 37.47 38.11 36.54
36.54
42.79 38.79 36.84 36.30 37.33
29.76
33.15
40.57 39.14 32.67 35.12
16.64
7.10
8.23
7.67
15.34 13.30 12.42 12.03 12.58
15.13 14.94 15.23 14.54 13.11 12.63
IJ.89 15.14 14.27 13.48 12.57 12.61
I
2
Rota-ram
10.23
12.15
11.19
18.73
20.51
19.62
Keterangon: Md. MI, MI. W don MI bemmu-lwrl adalahperlokuon bahm amcliorondengon tokaran setom 0.2.5, A 7.5, don 10 % &i errqmn moksimum Fe.
Tabel Lampiran 15.
Bobot Kermg Tanaman Wdi pada Umur 8 Mmggu Setelah Tanaman (MST) akibat Perlakuan Pemberian Bahan Ameliasn Tanah
Gambut Samuda (Pasang Surut), Sampit Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) di Rumah Kaca
(Transisi)
dan
Keleraagmr: MO,MI. M2,M3 dan M4 hem-turW crdolak p d u h n b o b mneliaon dengun latomn selma 0.2.5, 5. 7.5. d m 10 % &z erapan mabunvnr Fe.
Tabel Lampiran 16.
Sumber Kaagamsn
Sidik Ragam Boobot Kering Tanamm Padi pa& Pulakuan Pemberi Bahao Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Ssmuda (Pasang surut), Sampit , (Transisi) dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) di Rumah Kaca
Derajat Bebas
Jumlah
Kuadrat
Tanah O a m w Pasane SuNI ~Samuda) Pedakuan 4 Gala 10 Total 14 Trmah Gsmbut Transisi ~ ~ Pw1akuan 4 Gal* 10 Total 14
t
Tanah Gambut Pcdalaman Okenebenekcl) Pedakuan 4 Galat 10 Total 14 * nyata m a = 0.01
KuadratTcngSh
Fhihmg
Peluang
237.69 12.88 250.57
59.42 1.29
46.15
0.0010*'
1 62.27 LO.I2 72.39
15.57 1.01
15.39
0.0000**
9.524 0.168
56.71
O.WOO**
38.097 1.679 39.777
--
Tabel Lampiran 17.
'0
2 3
M3
I 2 3
M4
I 2 3
Hasil Rata-~ataPengamatan Tinggi Taman Padi (an) pada Umw 2,4,6 dm 8 Minggu Setelah T a m a n (MST)akibatt~erlalacan Pemberian Bahan Ameliaan pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengbengkel ( P + a . ) di Rumah Kaca
27.3 26.4 30.6 29.6 32.7 33.8 29.5 35.4
38.6 40.5 50.0 48.0 50.8 54.1 49.8 57.3
47.3 45.1 59.7 56.2 60.3 63.5 58.1 62.6
58.0 50.1 68.5 64.6 67.3 67.3 62.5 67.5
27.8 24.6 342 28.5 31.6 32.8 30.5 28.3
34.0 36.1 40.2 37.0 30.4 41.2 38.5 37.4
47.8 42.1 59.1 50.0 51.1 51.5 47.4 45.5
58,4 50.5 69.2 68.0 64.0 63.5 63.5 65.0
34.4 29.1 36.3 32.6 30.6 30.1 35.5 32.2
384 34.7 40.1 36.2 35.5 36.1 40.5 363
42.4 38.2 43.1 41.3 41.7 41.5 44.5 40.6
47.1 43.2 48.5 47.6 49.8 45.2 48.5 44.3
Kenrangan: MO, MI, MI, M3 don MI bcrhuut-nuul odnlahperhkuan bohm melioran drngan takaran seforo 0,d.S. 5. 7.5, dan 10 % doi e r w n maksimwn Fe.
Tabel Lampiran 18.
Hasil Rata-rata JumlahAnakan Padi pada Umur 2,4,6, dan 8Minggu Setelah Tansman (MST) akibat Perlakuan Panberian Bahan Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (F'asang surut), Sampit(Transisi), dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) di Rumah kxa
Tabel Lampiran 19. Hasil Pengukuran Kandungan Unsur N, P, K, dan Fe Daun Tanaman Padi pada Umur 8 Minggu Setelah Tanaman (MST)akibat Perlakuan Pemberian Bahan Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) di Rumah Kaca
Perlakuan
MO
Ulangan
1 2 3 1
M1
M2
M3
M4
2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut) P K Fe
N
(%)
(%)
(%)
0.421 0.302 0.292 0.731 0.903 0.861 1.252 1.357 0.966 1.325 1.541 1.211 1.273 1.557 1.283
0.233 0.226 0.245 0.275 0.284 0.283 0.294 0.302 0.286 0.342 0.304 0.338 0.301 0.304 0.313
0.269 0.326 0.514 0.258 0.560 0.631 0.963 1.114 0.732 1.342 0.983 1.589 1.239 1.362 1.316
(ppm) 18.115 16.849 20.136 26.099 24.149 30.102 40.200 46.473 31.607 52.724 50.026 46.360 45.149 72.142 62.906
N
Gambut Sampit (Transisi) P K Fe
(%)
("h)
(%)
0.421 0.142 0.317 0.603 0.769 0.418 1.237 1.089 0.778 0.918 1.571 1.294 1.143 1.539 0.968
0.403 0.425 0.412 0.440 0.414 0.442 0.461 0.458 0.443 0.482 0.475 0.476 0.446 0.474 0.451
0.331 0.285 0.443 0.841 1.152 0.645 0.960 1.159 0.862 1.078 1.375 1.180 1.275 1.298 0.938
(ppm) 16.115 19.481 18.012 22.798 23.261 26.523 37.549 36.623 33.534 45.283 43.629 38.671 44.983 53.441 60.511
Gambut Berengbengkel (Pedalamml N P K Fe (%) (ppm) (%) (%) 0.185 0.146 0.198 11.780 0.432 0.156 0.416 13.600 0.530 0.270 0.298 16.684 0.629 0.250 0.700 15.572 0.478 0.270 0.813 24.843 0.545 0.283 1.109 23.821 1.148 0.283 1.021 31.375 0.930 0.276 1.140 24.346 0.643 0.271 0.864 36.341 1.433 0.390 1.066 42.546 1.208 0.350 1.167 36.603 0.991 0.328 1.246 44.398 1.392 0.324 1.108 53.366 1.287 0.284 0.874 40.963 0.846 0.323 1.298 50.082
Kererangon: MO. MI. M2.M3 dan MI belhrrul-funuadalahperla~n khan amelromn drngon mbmn selora 0,2.J, 5, 7.5, dan 10 % dar e r m n mbimw Fe.
Sidik Ragam Kandungan N, P, K, dan Fe Tanaman Padi pada Perlakuan Pemberian Bahan Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) di Rumah Kaca
Tabel Lampiran 20.
~ ~ m I(=gaman b a
N i t r m (N) Perlakuan Galat Posfor (P) Perlakuan Galat Kalium (K) Perlakuan Galat Perlakuan
Nitrogen (N) Perlakuan Galat Posfor (P) Perlakuan Galat Kalium (K) Perlakuan Galat Besi (Fe) Perlakuan Galat
Derajat ~~b~~
Jumlah
Kuam;lt
Kuadrat Tagah
F hihmg
Pcluaog
4 10 4 10 4 10 4
4 10
4 10 4 10 4 10 Gambuf Berenebemekel IPeMmtanl
Nilmeen (%) Perlakuan 4 Galat 10 Posfor (%) Perlakuan 4 Galat 10 Kalium I%) Perlh 4 Galat 10 Besi (Fe) Perlakuan 4 Galat 10 ** nyatapa&n=0.01
1.64144573 0.46853400
0.41036143 0.04685340
8.76
0.0026**
0.04451827 0.01313267
0.01 112957 0.00131327
8.47
0.00308*
1.4 1508973 0.25785800
0.35377243 0.02578580
13.72
0.0005**
2332.86 1762 252.383008
583.215441 25.238301
23.1 1
O.OOO~**
Tabel Lampiran 21.
Bobot Gabah Tanaman Padi (tonha) &bat Perlakuan Pemberian Bahan Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Pedalaman (Berengbengkel) di Lapangan pada Pot Terbuka dan TRtutup, serta Petakan
Tabel Lampiran 22. Sidik Ragam Bobot Gabah Kering Tanaman Padi pada Perlakuan Pemberm Bahan Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut) dan Sampit (Transisi) di Lapangan pada Pengamatan Petakan Derajat Bebas
Sumber Keragaman Gambui Sm&
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F hitung
Peluang
(Pasanz surut)
Kelompok
2
0.09748
0.04874
0.41
0.6748
Perlakuan
4
11.18133
2.79522
23.71
0.0002
Galat
8
10.94318
0.11789
Total
14
12.22200
Tanah Gambui S-it
Pransisi)
Kelompok
2
0.06577
0.03288
0.21
0.8151
Perlakuan
4
8.24244
2.06061
13.14
0.0014
Galat
8
1.25436
0.15579
Total
14
9.56257
* nyatapada
**
a = 0.01
**
Tabel Lampiran 23. Hasil Rata-rrJa Pengamatan Tii Tanaman Padi (cm) pada Umur 2,4 6 dan 8 Minggu Setelah Tanaman (MST) akibat Pdakuan Pemberian Bahan Amelioan pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (pasang surut), Smpit (Tnmsisi), dan Berengbengkel(Pedalaman)di Lapangan pada Pengamatan Petakan
M3
1 2 3 Rata-rata
I
M4
2 3 Rata-rata
42.3 41.3 39.5
51.7 58.6 56.1
69.4 79.3 79.4
81.6 86.7 86.3
41.3 40.9 39.7
50.7 58.2 56.4
73.7 79.8 77.6
81.7 86.9 85.6
28.3 30.2 31.6
50.7 50.2 48.1
54.0 54.3 53.9
43.6 47.3 26.3
41.0
55.5
76.0
84.9
40.6
55.1
77.0
84.7
30.0
49.7
54.1
39.8
40.4 42.5 40.7
56.8 54.7 60.2
76.4 80.4 77.8
82.9 81.2 88.1
37.9 40.3 42.7
55.5 55.9 60.7
75.5 73.5 79.1
83.6 80.4 89.4
29.1 29.4 30.5
38.9 38.1 38.9
41.2
57.2
78.2
84.1
40.3
57.4
76.0
84.5
29.7
37.7 35.3 38.5 37.2
Kererangan: MO, MI, M2. M3 don MI brrhrrul-fumt&lah perlrrhcnn bahan amrbmn d e w * ~ k n r mrelaro , 4 2.5.5, 7.5, &n I0 % dai errgrrn mbfmum Fe.
38.6
Tabel Lampiran 24. Hasil Rata-rata Jurnlah Anakan Padi pada Umur 2,4,6,dan 8 Miggu Setelah Tanaman (MST) akibat Perlakuan Pemberian Bahan Amelioran pads Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) di Lapangan pada Pmgamatan Petakan
M3
1 2 3 Rata-rata 1
M4
2 3 Rata-rata
10.2 10.1 10.8
24.2 22.2 24.5
38.9 45.6 46.4
46.7 52.3 53.6
10.4 9.9 11.2 10.5
23.6
43.6
50.9
24.5 27.1 25.7
42.6 45.1 44.0
10.5
25.8
43.9
8.3 11.4 10.8
23.4 20.3 22.9
35.6 45.8 46.5
46.2 48.3 53.7
2.7 2.9 2.9
7.9 8.5 9.1
20.8 19.8 22.2
17.7 13.8 19.0 16.8
22.2
42.6
49.4
2.8
8.5
20.9
47.6 50.5 49.3
10.2 7.8 12.1 11.5
22.4 25.6 21.7
40.8 44.8 41.9
47.1 50.1 49.5
3.3 3.2 3.2
6.7 6.7 6.4
12.1 10.9 11.4
49.1
10.5
23.2
42.5
48.9
3.2
6.5
11.5
fibrangan:MO, MI. M2,M 3 don MI brmyw~u~1dadolohpcrlclhrrn k h a n meliomn & n p n a h m n se&rc O,Z.S,S,7.5, &n I0 % dal e r v n ntobbnwn Fe.
Tabcl Lampiran 25.
Hasil Rata-rata Tinggi Tanaman Padi pda Umur 2, 4, 6, dan 8 Minggu Setelah Tanaman (MST) akibat Pcrlakuan P a n h i a n Bahan Amclioran pada Tanah Gambut Samuda (Pasang Smut), Sampit (Twisi), dun &nngbcngkd (Pedalaman) di LqanganpadaPot Tubuka dan Tatutup
Tabel Lampiran 26.
Hasil Rata-rata Jumlah Anakan Padi p d a Umur 2, 4, 6, dan 8 Minggu Setelah Tanaman (MST) akibat Perlakuan Pemberian Balm Amelioran pada Tanah Gambut Semuda (Pasang sunrt), Sampit (Transisi), dm Baengbcngkel (Pedalaman) di Lapangam @a Pot Tabuka dan Tahttup
Tabel Lampiran 27. Konsentrasi Beberapa Derivat Asam Fenolat pada Waktu Pengamatan 1, 2, dan 3 Bulan Setelah Tanam (BST) dalarn Gambut Samuda (Pasang Surut), Sampit (Transisi), dan Berengbengkel (Pedalaman) pada Perlakuan Pemberian Bahan Amelioran pada Pot Terbuka dan Tertutup di Lapangan Asam Hklrobiknmt
