101
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Abd El_Latif SA, El_Malt EA. 2003. Short notice in duck industry. Di dalam: Proceeding 2nd World Waterfowl Conference.7-9 October 2003. Alexandria – Egypt:448-453. Applegate TJ, Ladwig E, Weissert L, Lilburn MS. 1999. Effect of hen age on intestinal development and glucose tolerance of the Peking duckling. Poult. Sci. 78: 1485-1492. Baeza E, Salichon MR, Marche G, Wacrenier N, Dominguez B, Culioli J. 1999. Age and sex effects on the technological and chemical characteristic of Mule duck meat. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 531-537. Becker WA. 1975. Manual of Quantitative Genetics. Third Ed. Washington State University. Bintang IAK, Silalahi M, Antawidjaja T, Raharjo YC. 1997. Pengaruh berbagai tingkat kepadatan gizi ransum terhadap kinerja pertumbuhan itik jantan lokal dan persilangannya. JITV 2 (4): 237-241. Bourdon RM. 1997. Understanding Animal Breeding. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Simon & Schuster Asia Pte, Ltd., Singapore. Brahmantiyo B, Prasetyo LH. 2002. Karakteristik pertumbuhan itik Pegagan sebagai sumber plasma nutfah ternak. Di Dalam: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan, Bogor:286-289. Brun JM, Guy G, Rouvier R. 1995. Growth allometry of carcass trait between 12 and 14 weeks of age, in Mule duck from 4 dam genotypes. Di dalam: Proceeding 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. March 26-31, 1995. World's Poultry Science Association. Halle (Saale) Germany: 439-442. Brun JM, Larzul C. 2002. Inheritance of reproductive traits of female common ducks in pure breeding and in inter-generic crossbreeding with muscovy ducks. Di dalam: 7th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production. August 19-23, 2002. Montpellier-France. Carefoot WC. 1979. A phenotypic effect of heterozygous recessive white in the fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 20: 117-120. Campbell RR, Reinhard BS, Jerome FN. 1984. A "new" allele of the Mallard plumage pattern in ducks. Poul. Sci. 63: 19-24.
101
102
Chen MT. 1999. Utilization of waterfowl. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 32-37. Cheng YS et al. 1999. Selection experiment for maximum duration of fertility in Brown Tsaiya bred for mule ducks: Comparison of fertility, hatchability, embryo mortality rate in selected and control line. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 115-121. Cheng YS, Rouvier R, Hu YH, Tai JJL, Tai C. 2002. Breeding and genetics of waterfowl. Di dalam: 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Aug 19-23. 2002. France. Clayton GA, Powel JC. 1979. Growth, food conversion, carcass yields and their heritabilities in ducks (Anas platyrhyncos). Br. Poult. Sci. 20: 121-127. Ducos A et al. 1997. Karyotypes of mallard, muscovy and mule ducks. Di dalam: Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Nantes (France), September 8-10: 252-258. Dupuy V, Nersessian B, Barkst MR. 2002. Embryonic development from cleavage through seventy-two hours incubation in two strain of Pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos). Poult. Sci. 81: 860-868. Fairfull RW, Millan IM, Muir WM. 1998. Poultry breeding: Progress and prospect for genetic improvement of egg and meat production. Di dalam: Proceeding of the 6th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production: 271-277. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Fourth Edition. Longman Malaysia. Fox W, Smyth JRJr. 1985. The effect of recessive white and dominant white genotypes on early growth rate. Poult. Sci. 64: 429-433. Gille U, Salomon FV, Ronnet J. 1999. Growth of digestible organs in ducks with considerations on their growth in birds in general. Bri. Poult. Sci. 40 (2): 194-202. Grossman M, Gosman TN, Koops WJ. 2000. A model for persistency of egg production. Poult. Sci. 79: 1715-1724. Gunawan B. 1988.Teknologi pemuliabiakan itik petelur Indonesia. Di dalam: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Petrnakan dan Forum Peternak Unggas “Unggas dan Aneka Ternak” II. Ciawi, 18-20 Juli 1988. Balai Penelitian Ternak Ciawi, Bogor: 24-39. 102
103
Guy G, Hermier D, Davail S, Bely M, Andre J-M, Hoo-Paris R. 1999. Meat production and force feeding ability of different types of ducks. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 462-468. Gvaryahu G, Robinzon B, Snapir N. 1985. Overcoming behavioral bariers in mating the muscovy drake (Cairina moschata) with the Pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos). Poult. Sci. 64: 417-419. Hanh DT, Hai LTh, Hung DS, Tinh NH. 1995. Improving the productivity of local muscovy duck by crossing with high yielding exotic muscovy duck and the initial production experiment of Mullard in Vietnam. Di dalam: Proceeding 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. March 26-31, 1995. World's Poultry Science Association, Halle (Saale) Germany: 31-39. Harahap D. 1993. Potensi itik mandalung sebagai penghasil daging ditinjau dari berat karkas dan penilaian organoleptik dagingnya dibandingkan dengan tetuanya. [Thesis]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor, Program Pascasarjana. Hardjosworo PS, Setioko AR, Ketaren PP, Prasetyo LH, Sinurat AP, Rukmiasih. 2001. Perkembangan teknologi peternakan unggas air di Indonesia. Di dalam: "Pengembangan Agribrisnis Unggas Air sebagai Peluang Bisnis Baru”. Lokakarya Nasional Unggas Air. Ciawi 6-7 Agustus 2001. Bogor: Kerjasama Fakultas Peternakan IPB dengan Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor: 22-41. Hetzel DJS. 1985. Duck breeding strategies – the Indonesian example. Di dalam: Duck Production Science and World Practice. Farrell, DJ. and Stapleton, P. (Ed) University of New England: 204-223. Hoffman E, Canning SS. 1993. Mule duck. http://www.Cyborganic.com/People/ Feathersite/Poultry/Duck/Musc/Mule. html. [Februari 2001] Hutt FB. 1949. Genetics of the Fowl. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York. USA. Isguzar E, Pingel H. 2003. Some egg and hatching traits of local and different duck breeds in Isparta/Turkey. Di dalam: Proceeding 2nd World Waterfowl Conference.7-9 October 2003. Alexandria – Egypt:349-354. Iskandar S, Desmayati, Antawidjaja T, Murtisari T, Lasmini A. 1993. Perbandingan produk berbagai jenis itik betina afkir dan entog. Ilmu dan Peternakan Vol. 7 (1): 20-24. Iskandar S, Bintang IAK, Triyantini. 2000. Tingkat energi / protein ransum untuk menunjang produksi dan kualitas daging anak itik jantan lokal. Di dalam: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peternakan dan Veteriner. Bogor 18-19 September 2000, Bogor: Pulitbang Peternakan: 300-309. 103
104
Jaap RG, Milby TT. 1944. Comparative genetics of blue plumage in poultry. Poult. Sci. 23: 3-8. Jaap RG, Hollander WF. 1954. Wild standard in poultry genetics. Poult. Sci. 33: 94-100. Knizetova H, Knize B, Hyanek J, Siler R, Hyankova L, Plachy J, Vilhelmova M. 1983. Growth curves of highly inbred lines of fowl and their F1 hybrids. Genet. Sel. Evol. 15 (4):533-558. Knizetova H, Hort J. 1997. Growth curves of Pekin duck and geese. Di dalam : Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Nantes (France), September 8-10: 533-538. Kschischan M, Wagner A, Knust U, Pingel H, Koehler D. 1995. Effect of different fattening method on Mulards and Pekin ducks. Di dalam: Proceeding 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. March 26-31, 1995. World's Poultry Science Association. Halle (Saale) Germany: 62-65. Ksiazkiewicz J, Smalec E, Gruzewska A. 1997. Models of duck growth. Di dalam: Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Nantes (France), September 8-10: 605-609. Lancaster FM. 1993. Mutation and major variants in domestic ducks. Di dalam: Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Edited by Crawford RD. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada: 381-388. Larzul C,.Rouvier R, Guy G, Rousselot-Pailley D. 1999a. Heritability estimates for growth and carcass part traits in a strain of white geese slaughteres at 11 week of age. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China:108-114. Larzul C,.Rouvier R, Guy G, Rousselot-Pailley D. 1999b. Influence of female pekin body size on overfeed mule ducks performance. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China:122-127. Lee YP. 1998. Preservation and utilization of poultry genetic resources in Taiwan. Di dalam: Proceedings 6th Asian Pasific Poultry Congress. Nagiya Japan: 36-41. Maruyama K, Akbar MK, Turk CM. 1999. Growth pattern and carcass development in male ducks selected for growth rate. Br. Poult. Sci. 40 (2): 233-239.
104
105
Matull A, Reiter K. 1995. Investigation of comfort of Pekin duck, Muscovy and Mulards ducks. Di dalam: Proceeding 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. March 26-31, 1995. World's Poultry Science Association. Halle (Saale) Germany: 146-149. Mellett FD, Randall JH. 1994. A note the growth of body parts of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Anim. Prod. 58: 290-293. Myers RH. 1986. Classical and Modern Regression with Application. Second Edition. PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston. Naware dan Ardi I. 1979. Intensive duck production in Alabio, South Kalimantan. Di dalam: Proceeding Second Poultry Science and Industry Seminar. Centre Research and Development, Bogor. Nageswara AR, Ravindra RV, Ramasubba RV, Eshwaraiah ANGR. 1999. Performance of Indian nondescript ducks, Khaki Campbell and their reciprocal crossbred layers under different management system. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. Taiwan, Republic of China: 454-459. Nei M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press. New York. Noor RR. 2000. Genetika Ternak. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta. Okamoto S, Kobayashi S, Okada I. 1996. Changes in growth curves following long term selection for 6 week body weight in Japanese quail. Di dalam: Partnerships for Sustainable Livestock Production and Human Welfare. Proceeding The 8 th AAAP Anim. Sci. Congress. Vol.2: 24-25. Parkhurst CR, Mountney GJ. 1988. Poultry Meat and Egg Production. An Avi Book. Published by Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York. Pierko M, Szczepanczyk E. 1997. The craniometric analysis of the long-tail ducks Clangla Hyemalis. Di dalam: Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Nantes (France), September 8-10: 398-403. Poivey J.P, Cheng YS, Rouvier R, Tai C, Wang CT, Liu HL. 2001. Genetic parameters of reproductive traits in brown Tsaiya ducks artificially inseminated with semen from muscovy duckes. Poult. Sci. 80: 703-709. Prasetyo LH, Susanti T. 1996. Karakterisasi dan potensi plasma nutfah itik, itik Mojosari. Bul. Plasma Nutfah Vol. 1 (1): 35-37. Prasetyo LH, Susanti T. 1997. Persilangan timbal balik antara itik Tagal dan Mojosari : I. Awal pertumbuhan dan awal bertelur. JITV. Vol. 2 (3): 152156. 105
106
Rauch HW. 1995. Effect of feed on canibalism of non beak trimmed muscovy ducks. Di dalam: Proceeding 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. March 26-31, 1995. World's Poultry Science Association. Halle (Saale) Germany: 155-158. Retailleau B. 1997. Performances of roasting mule duck testing of various genotypes and of various salughter ages. Di dalam: Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Nantes (France), September 8-10: 633-638. Retailleau B. 1999. Comparison of the growth and body composition of 3 types of duck: Pekin, Muscovy and Mule. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 597-602. Robinson DW, Usman A, Dartojo E, Chavez ER. 1977. The husbandry of Alabio ducks in South Kalimantan Swampland. Center Report 3. Centre Research and Development, Bogor. Romanov MN, Veremeyenko RP, Bondarenko YV. 1995. Conservation of waterfowl germplasm in Ukraine. Di dalam: Proceeding 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. March 26-31, 1995. World's Poultry Science Association. Halle (Saale) Germany: 401-414. Rouvier R, Guy G, Rouseelot-Pailet D, Poujardieu B. 1994. Genetic parameters from factorial cross breeding in two duck strain (Anas platyrhynchos) Brown Tsaiya and Pekin, for growth and fatty liver traits. Br. Poult. Sci. 35: 509-517. Rouvier RG. 1999. Genetics and physiology of waterfowl. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China. hlm 1-18. Samosir DJ.1983. Ilmu Beternak Itik. Jakarta. PT. Gramedia. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Version 8 Edition. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. Setioko AR, et al. 1997. Program seleksi itik Magelang pada Village Breeding Centre: Pembuatan populasi dasar dan program seleksi. Di dalam: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peternakan dan Veteriner. Jilid II. Bogor 1819 Nopember 1997. Bogor: Puslitbangnak: 487-494. Setioko AR, Rohaeni ES. 2001. Pemberian ransum bahan pakan lokal terhadap produktivitas itik Alabio. Di dalam: "Pengembangan Agribrisnis Unggas Air sebagai Peluang Bisnis Baru”. Lokakarya Nasional Unggas Air. Ciawi 6-7 Agustus 2001. Bogor: Kerjasama Fakultas Peternakan IPB dengan Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor: 129-138. 106
107
Setioko AR, Prasetyo LH, Brahmantiyo B. 2002. Karakteristik produksi itik Bali sebagai sumber plasma nutfah ternak. Di dalam: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. Bogor 30 September-1 Oktober 2002. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan: 290-293. Shoukun W, Guangying W, Ang L, Changkang W, Xiaoping C, Zumei S. 1999. Research on mathematical models of the growth curves of muscovy ducks. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 490-493. Siswohardjono W. 1986. Performans produksi ternak entog, itik dan hasil perkawinan-silangnya. [Thesis]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor, Pasca Sarjana. Smyth,JR. 1993. Genetics of plumage, skin, eyes pigmentation in chickens. Di dalam: Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Edited by R.D. Crawford. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada: 109-168. Subiharta, Prasetyo LH, Rahardjo YC, Prawirodigdo S, Pramono D, Hartono. 2001. Program Village Breeding pada itik Tegal untuk peningkatan produksi telur: Seleksi itik Tegal generasi pertama dan kedua. Di dalam: "Pengembangan Agribrisnis Unggas Air sebagai Peluang Bisnis Baru”. Lokakarya Nasional Unggas Air. Ciawi 6-7 Agustus 2001. Bogor: Kerjasama Fakultas Peternakan IPB dengan Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor: 79-86. Sunari, Rukmiasih, Hardjosworo PS. 2001. Persentase bagian pangan dan non pangan itik Mandalung pada berbagai umur. Di dalam: "Pengembangan Agribrisnis Unggas Air sebagai Peluang Bisnis Baru”. Lokakarya Nasional Unggas Air. Ciawi 6-7 Agustus 2001. Bogor: Kerjasama Fakultas Peternakan IPB dengan Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor: 202-207. Suparyanto A. 2003. Karakteristik itik Mojosari putih dan peluang pengembangannya sebagai itik komersial. Wartazoa 13: 143-151. Tai C. 1985. Duck breeding and artificial insemination in Taiwan. Di dalam: Duck Production Science and World Practice. Farrell, D.J. and Stapleton, P. (Ed). University of New England: 193-203. Tai C, Cheng YS, Lee SR, Wang CT, Shen TF. 1997. The status of duck research in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Di dalam: Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. September 8-10, 1997. NANTES (France): 4357.
107
108
Togatorop MH, Setiadi B, Sitorus P, dan Iman M. 1988. Performans produksi telur itik di rawa dangkal babirik, Alabio Kalimantan Selatan. Di dalam: Proceedings Seminar Nasional Peternakan dan Forum Peternak “Unggas dan Aneka Ternak” II. Ciawi, Bogor 18-20 Juli 1988. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan. Bogor: 345-350. Triyantini, Abubakar, Bintang IAK, Antawidjaja T. 1997. Studi komparatif preferensi mutu dan gizi beberapa jenis daging ungggas. JITV 2 (3): 157163. Tri-Yuwanta.1984. Hubungan berat dan indeks telur dengan jenis kelamin anak itik yang menetas. Laporan Penelitian. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Gajah Mada. Yogyakarta. Tri-Yuwanta, Sidadolog JHP, Zuprizal, Musofie A. 1999. Characteristic phenotype of Turi local duck and its relationship with production and reproduction rate. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 92-95. Ulupi, N. 1993. Pengaruh tingkat serat kasar ransum terhadap panjang dan bobot organ pencernaan itik Tegal. Media Peternakan. Faklutas Peternakan. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Vol. 16 (3): 51-56. Velez, A., JM. Brun, R. Rouvier. 1996. Crossbreeding effects on reproductive traits in two strain of duck (Anas platyrhynchos) : Brown Tsaiya and Pekin. Br. Poult. Sci. 37: 571-577. Warwick EJ, Astuti JM, Hardjosubroto W. 1984. Pemuliaan Ternak. Gajah Mada University Press. Washburn KW. 1993. Genetics variation in egg composition. Di dalam: Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Edited by R.D. Crawford. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada: 781-804. Wezyk S. 1999. Current problem of waterfowl genetics and breeding. Di dalam: Proceeding 1st World Waterfowl Conference. December 1-4, 1999. Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China: 50-62. Wiederhold S, Pingel H. 1997. Growth of breast and leg muscle of waterfowl. Di dalam: Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Nantes (France), September 8-10: 541-547. Wilson BJ, Martin DM, Nott H. 1997. Future genetic improvements in Pekin-tipe ducks. Di dalam: Proceeding 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl. September 8-10, 1997. NANTES (France): 328-335.
108
109
Lampiran 1. Hasil analisis varian pola tersarang (NESTED) Nested ANOVA: POTONG versus Bapak; Induk; Itik Analysis of Variance for POTONG Source DF SS MS Bapak 7 695443.6622 99349.0946 Induk 25 2042242.8628 81689.7145 Itik 81 11887777.0978 146762.6802 Total 113 14625463.6228 Variance Components Source Var Comp. % of Total StDev Bapak 1941.037 1.31 44.057 Induk -19648.980* 0.00 0.000 Itik 146762.680 98.69 383.096 Total 148703.717 385.621 * Value is negative, and is estimated by zero. Expected Mean Squares 1 Bapak 1.00(3) + 3.75(2) + 13.57(1) 2 Induk 1.00(3) + 3.31(2) 3 Itik 1.00(3) Nested ANOVA: MATI versus Bapak; Induk; Itik Analysis of Variance for MATI Source DF SS MS Bapak 7 587120.8581 83874.4083 Induk 25 1726265.2019 69050.6081 Itik 81 8802950.5102 108678.4014 Total 113 11116336.5702 Variance Components Source Var Comp. % of Total StDev Bapak 1481.914 1.35 38.496 Induk -11965.733* 0.00 0.000 Itik 108678.401 98.65 329.664 Total 110160.315 331.904 * Value is negative, and is estimated by zero. Expected Mean Squares 1 Bapak 1.00(3) + 3.75(2) + 13.57(1) 2 Induk 1.00(3) + 3.31(2) 3 Itik 1.00(3) 109
110
Lampiran 2. Contoh pembuatan program analisis non-linier model Gompertz dan hasil perhitungan DATA PM; INPUT NO X YB; CARDS; PROC NLIN best=10 method=marquardt; PARMS B0=10 to 60 by 1 B1=1 to 10 by 0.1 B2=0 to 0.1 by 0.01; MODEL yb=b0*exp(-b1*exp(-b2*x)); der.b0=exp(-b1*exp(-b2*x)); der.b1=-b0*exp(-b1*exp(-b2*x))*exp(-b2*x); der.b2=b0*b1*x*exp(-b1*exp(-b2*x))*exp(-b2*x); TITLE ‘LAJU PERTUMBUHAN MORFOLOGI PM'; RUN; Hasil Analisis :
The SAS System
Non-Linear Least Squares Grid Search Dependent Variable YB B0 B1 B2 Sum of Squares 35.000000 1.700000 0.020000 395.150993 34.000000 1.600000 0.020000 397.188500 35.000000 1.600000 0.020000 400.106767 36.000000 1.700000 0.020000 403.266520 36.000000 1.800000 0.020000 433.076083 34.000000 1.500000 0.020000 443.542153 33.000000 1.500000 0.020000 444.318797 37.000000 1.800000 0.020000 447.535277 34.000000 1.700000 0.020000 459.550995 33.000000 1.600000 0.020000 470.737330 Non-Linear Least Squares Iterative Phase Method: Marquardt Iter B0 B1 B2 0 35.000000 1.700000 1 36.845044 1.670907 2 38.391341 1.701680 3 38.652674 1.706651 4 38.656684 1.706714 5 38.656694 1.706714 NOTE: Convergence criterion met.
Dependent Variable YB Sum of Squares 0.020000 395.150993 0.017945 376.084081 0.016950 373.690825 0.016863 373.369524 0.016861 373.369456 0.016861 373.369456
110
111
Non-Linear Least Squares Summary Statistics Source
DF Sum of Squares
Dependent Variable YB
Mean Square
Regression 3 45422.520544 15140.840181 Residual 131 373.369456 2.850149 Uncorrected Total 134 45795.890000 (Corrected Total) 133 9968.134701 Parameter B0 B1 B2
Estimate
Asymptotic Asymptotic 95 % Std. Error Confidence Interval Lower Upper 38.65669384 2.5007511053 33.709569510 43.603818174 1.70671415 0.0551262644 1.597660320 1.815767979 0.01686120 0.0016170603 0.013662241 0.020060158 Asymptotic Correlation Matrix
Corr B0 B1 B2
B0
B1
B2
1 0.8454940886 -0.975960726 0.8454940886 1 -0.742592567 -0.975960726 -0.742592567 1
111
112
Lampiran 3. Contoh pembuatan program analisis non-linier model WOOD dan hasil perhitungan DATA WOOD; INPUT n x yb; CARDS; PROC SORT; by n; PROC NLIN best=10 method=DUD; by n; PARMS B0=1 to 10 by 1 B1=1 to 10 by 0.1 B2=0 to 0.1 by 0.01; MODEL yb=b0*x**b1*exp(-b2*x); by n; TITLE 'PRODUKSI TELUR DARI GALUR INDUK'; RUN; Hasil Analisis :
TELUR ITIK PM
Non-Linear Least Squares Grid Search Dependent Variable YB B0 B1 B2 Sum of Squares 2.000000 1.000000 0.100000 1490.292254 1.000000 1.100000 0.080000 1639.128364 1.000000 1.200000 0.100000 1645.546307 1.000000 1.000000 0.070000 1652.553653 1.000000 1.000000 0.060000 1660.991052 1.000000 1.100000 0.090000 1661.565051 1.000000 1.200000 0.090000 1709.158510 1.000000 1.000000 0.080000 1735.466222 1.000000 1.100000 0.070000 1741.785862 2.000000 1.000000 0.090000 1750.091531 Non-Linear Least Squares DUD Initialization Dependent Variable YB DUD B0 B1 B2 Sum of Squares -4 2.000000 1.000000 0.100000 1490.292254 -3 2.200000 1.000000 0.100000 1641.551031 -2 2.000000 1.100000 0.100000 2254.262602 -1 2.000000 1.000000 0.110000 1389.275653 Non-Linear Least Squares Iterative Phase Dependent Variable YB Method: DUD Iter B0 B1 B2 Sum of Squares 0 2.000000 1.000000 0.110000 1389.275653 1 6.352976 -0.711436 -0.106302 949.770934 2 5.868832 -0.160493 -0.001143 711.032606 3 6.114925 -0.171601 -0.013812 575.575297 4 6.152437 -0.034546 0.002291 545.589527 5 6.038256 -0.035661 0.004544 543.967992 6 6.164407 -0.036772 0.006094 543.423521 112
113
7 6.189574 -0.030689 8 6.189479 -0.030757 9 6.187163 -0.030195 10 6.187545 -0.030242 11 6.187537 -0.030242 NOTE: Convergence criterion met.
0.005868 0.005852 0.005906 0.005903 0.005903
Non-Linear Least Squares Summary Statistics Source
DF Sum of Squares
542.042816 542.042803 542.042355 542.042348 542.042348
Dependent Variable YB
Mean Square
Regression 3 4180.9576521 1393.6525507 Residual 132 542.0423479 4.1063814 Uncorrected Total 135 4723.0000000 (Corrected Total) 134
567.4370370 TELUR PM
Parameter B0 B1 B2
Estimate
Asymptotic Asymptotic 95 % Std. Error Confidence Interval Lower Upper 6.187537218 0.31897296849 5.5565717460 6.8185026898 -0.030241992 0.06566257719 -0.1601301742 0.0996461899 0.005903343 0.01114142334 -0.0161356831 0.0279423682 Asymptotic Correlation Matrix
Corr B0 B1 B2
B0 B1 B2 1 -0.304304949 0.0051195967 -0.304304949 1 0.9211494044 0.0051195967 0.9211494044 1
113
114
Lampiran 4. Tabel pola warna bulu Mandalung pada saat dewasa Uraian 1. Warna kepala • Abu-abu • Hitam • Putih • Lurik • Coklat 2. Pola belang kepala • Coklat putih • Hitam • Lurik coklat • Lurik • Putih • Solid 3. Warna leher • Abu-abu • Coklat • Hitam • Putih • Lurik 4. Pola belang leher • Abu-abu • Coklat • Hitam • Lurik coklat • Putih • Solid • Coklat hitam • Lurik hitam • Lurik • Lurik putih
n
EPM
EPA
%
n
%
8 12 73 0 0
8.6 12.9 78.5 0 0
0 63 18 2 4
0.0 72.4 20.7 2.3 4.6
1 63 2 2 9 16 0
1.1 67.7 2.2 2.2 9.7 17.1 0.0
0 15 3 21 26 11 7
0.0 17.2 3.4 24.2 29.9 12.7 8.2
1 1 3 88 0
1.1 1.1 3.2 94.6 0.0
0 2 8 75 2
0.0 2.3 9.2 86.2 2.3
1 1 8 2 2 79 0 0 0 0
1.1 1.1 8.6 2.2 2.2 84.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 3 25 5 6 35 4 1 5 1
2.2 3.4 28.8 5.8 6.9 40.3 4.6 1.1 5.8 1.1
114
115
Lampiran 5. Tabel pola warna bulu Mandalung pada saat dewasa (Lanjutan) EPM EPA Uraian n % n % 5. Warna punggung 3 3.2 0 0.0 • Abu-abu 1 1.1 0 0.0 • Bercak coklat 1 1.1 2 2.2 • Coklat 49 52.7 62 71.3 • Hitam 1 1.1 11 12.6 • Lurik 38 40.9 12 13.8 • Putih 6. Pola belang punggung 1 1.1 1 1.1 • Abu-abu 1 1.1 0 0.0 • Coklat putih 23 24.7 15 17.2 • Hitam 1 1.1 0 0.0 • Lurik coklat 2 2.2 6 6.9 • Lurik 18 19.4 23 26.5 • Putih 47 50.5 38 43.8 • Solid 0 0.0 1 1.1 • Coklat hitam 0 0.0 3 3.4 • Coklat 7. Warna dada 3 3.2 4 4.6 7 7.5 0 0.0 • Coklat 1 1.1 11 12.6 • Hitam 82 88.2 64 73.6 • Lurik 0 0.0 8 9.2 • Putih • Coklat putih 8. Pola belang dada 3 3.2 0 0.0 • Bercak coklat 1 1.1 0 0.0 • Coklat putih 8 8.6 8 9.3 • Hitam 10 10.8 13 14.9 • Lurik coklat 1 1.1 0 0.0 • Lurik hitam 3 3.2 12 13.9 • Lurik 2 2.2 37 42.7 • Putih 65 69.9 6 6.9 • Solid 0 0.0 8 9.3 • Coklat
115
116
Lampiran 6. Tabel pola warna bulu Mandalung pada saat dewasa (Lanjutan) EPM EPA Uraian n % n % 9. Warna sayap 1 1.1 2 2.3 • Abu-abu 1 1.1 0 0.0 • Lurik coklat 16 17.2 8 9.2 • Lurik 74 79.6 26 29.9 • Putih 1 1.1 0 0.0 • Coklat 0 0.0 51 58.6 • Hitam 10. Pola belang sayap • Hitam 7 7.5 16 18.4 • Lurik coklat 8 8.6 1 1.1 • Lurik 2 2.2 6 6.9 • Putih 5 5.4 34 39.2 • Solid 71 76.3 20 23.0 • Abu-abu 0 0 8 9.2 • Coklat hitam 0 0.0 1 1.1 • Coklat 0 0.0 1 1.1 11. Warna paha • Abu-abu 2 2.2 9 10.3 3 3.2 0 0.0 • Bercak 1 1.1 4 4.7 • Coklat 14 15.1 9 10.3 • Hitam 73 78.4 33 37.9 • Putih 0 0.0 1 1.1 • Abu hitam 0 0.0 1 1.1 • Lurik coklat 0 0.0 30 34.6 • Lurik 12. Pola belang paha • Hitam 3 3.2 18 20.7 • Lurik coklat 6 6.5 0 0.0 • Lurik 2 2.2 10 11.5 • Putih 8 8.6 28 32.2 • Solid 74 79.5 26 29.9 • Coklat hitam 0 0.0 1 1.1 • Coklat 0 0.0 4 4.6
116
117
Lampiran 7. Hasil analisis uji t-test bobot badan pada Mandalung EPM dan EPA TTEST PROCEDURE Variable: BBT1 BGS N Mean Std Dev Std Error Variances T DF Prob>|T| -------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------EPA 120 100.90833333 22.03739977 2.01173016 Unequal 4.3420 236.0 0.0001 EPM 118 88.52542373 21.95827896 2.02142343 Equal 4.3419 236.0 0.0000 For H0: Variances are equal, F' = 1.01
DF = (119,117) Prob>F' = 0.9693
Variable: BBT2 BGS N Mean Std Dev Std Error Variances T DF Prob>|T| -------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------EPA 120 261.25000000 75.11596077 6.85711769 Unequal 0.4020 225.4 0.6881 EPM 118 257.72881356 59.21028165 5.45074824 Equal 0.4012 236.0 0.6886 For H0: Variances are equal, F' = 1.61
DF = (119,117) Prob>F' = 0.0103
Variable: BBT3 BGS N Mean Std Dev Std Error Variances T DF Prob>|T| -------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------EPA 120 521.70833333 87.51618298 7.98909793 Unequal 2.0663 221.4 0.0400 EPM 118 494.77966102 111.84865657 10.29650343 Equal 2.0705 236.0 0.0395 For H0: Variances are equal, F' = 1.63
DF = (117,119) Prob>F' = 0.0081
Variable: BBT4 BGS N Mean Std Dev Std Error Variances T DF Prob>|T| -------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------EPA 119 851.20168067 145.92345218 13.37678093 Unequal -0.7897 225.7 0.4306 EPM 118 867.88983051 177.72670770 16.36106960 Equal -0.7903 235.0 0.4301 For H0: Variances are equal, F' = 1.48
DF = (117,118) Prob>F' = 0.0334
Variable: BBT5 BGS N Mean Std Dev Std Error Variances T DF Prob>|T| -------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------EPA 119 1318.01680672 189.61361172 17.38185129 Unequal -1.4215 234.2 0.1565 EPM 118 1353.95762712 199.46044288 18.36182210 Equal -1.4218 235.0 0.1564 For H0: Variances are equal, F' = 1.11
DF = (117,118) Prob>F' = 0.5838
Variable: BBT6 BGS N Mean Std Dev Std Error Variances T DF Prob>|T| -------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------EPA 117 1859.59829060 240.15336550 22.20218649 Unequal 3.1415 233.0 0.0019 EPM 118 1760.02542373 245.72176823 22.62052229 Equal 3.1412 233.0 0.0019 For H0: Variances are equal, F' =1.05
DF = (117,116)
Prob>F' = 0.8052
117
118
118
© Hak cipta milik IPB (Institut Pertanian Bogor)
•
Bogar Agricultural University
Hal:? Cipta Dilindungi Undang-Undang 1. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh I:?arya tulis ini tanpa mencantuml:?an dan menyebutl:?an sumber: a. Pengutipan hanya untul:? I:?epentingan pendidil:?an, penelitian, penulisan I:?arya ilmiah, penyusunan laporan, penulisan I:?ritil:? atau tinjauan suatu masalah. b. Pengutipan tidal:? merugil:?an I:?epentingan yang wajar IPB. 2 Dilarang mengumuml:?an dan memperbanyal:? sebagian atau seluruh I:?arya tulis ini dalam bentul:? apapun tanpa izin IPB.
