Duurzame fokkerij. Vlaamse Fokkerijdag. Leuven 6 november Gerard Albers. Hendrix Genetics

5de Vlaamse Fokkerijdag 06/11/2013

7-11-2013

Duurzame fokkerij Vlaamse Fokkerijdag Leuven 6 november 2013 Gerard Albers

Hendrix Genetics  Global

► Operations in 24 countries

 Multi-species

► Layer, turkey, pig, aquaculture and traditional poultry

 Animal Genetics

► The core of our business

 Leading

► 54 companies, strong brands

 Committed

► 2.400 employees worldwide

 Partner

► In value creation, collaboration, innovation and sustainability

Copyright Hendrix Genetics

Visie en aanpak van een productiegerichte fokkerijonderneming Gerard Albers

2

1


7-11-2013

Shared Research & Development

Layer Breeding

Turkey Breeding

Shared Specialized Services

Pig Breeding

Traditional Poultry Breeding

Aquaculture Breeding

Caringa Sud Ouest


3

Our company strategy is based on 4 pillars Value Creation

Collaboration

Innovation

Sustainability

Our mission: Hendrix Genetics helps the world meet a growing demand for food by supporting producers of animal protein with innovative and sustainable genetic solutions



4

2


7-11-2013

The Market Place Hybrid

ISA

Cobb

LNS

Hypor


5

Hendrix Genetics Sustainability Triangle

Value Chain

Community

Consumers

People BREEDING for the

BENEFIT

Bio Security

Genetic Resources

Environmental Impact

of

ALL Welfare

Animals

Use of Chemicals

Input Efficiency

Planet Copyright Hendrix Genetics


6

3


7-11-2013

People Hendrix Genetics will foster well-being and quality of life in our communities, with the final consumers of our products and throughout the value chain - including our suppliers and industry partners, our colleagues, and our customers.

Value Chain

Community

Customers

People

Planet Minimizing environmental impact in livestock production is a key part of what we do everyday, from our nucleus units to our customers’ farms, we are continuously improving input efficiency and helping reduce the use of chemicals.


Use of Chemicals


Input Efficiency

Planet

4


7-11-2013

Animals

Bio Security

Genetic Resources

Welfare

Animals

All of us at Hendrix Genetics have a special respect for animals and their welfare. And as suppliers of breeding stock to the world, we have a unique responsibility for biosecurity and animal health. Finally, as breeders, it is in our best interest to protect genetic resources for the future.

Profit/Benefit

BREEDING for the

BENEFIT of

ALL

Over the long term, profit is essential for the life of a business and for becoming more sustainable. And breeding is a powerful tool that can significantly impact profitability, animals, the planet and people.


5


7-11-2013

The Global Challenge

50

70%

100%

years

from now the world population will require

of this food must come from efficiencyimproving technology

more food, and

BREEDING for the BENEFIT of ALL

Source: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization 11

Development of the modern Brown commercial layer 1970

2000

2008

2013

2020

239

319

327

336

361

409

440

HH EGGS AT 75 Weeks

(NRS)

HH EGGS AT 90 Weeks

(NRS)

HH EGGS AT 100 Weeks

(NRS)

AGE AT 50% PRODUCTION

(WKS)

26

20

20

20

20

AGE AT PEAK PRODUCTION

(WKS)

29

26

26

25

25

500

RATE OF LAY AT PEAK

(%)

86

95

96

96

97

EGG MASS AT 75 Weeks

(KG)

14.9

20.0

20.8

21.0

22.6


(KG)

25.7

27.7


(KG)

FEED/DAY

(G/D)

127

114

114

113

112

FCR resp. 75 to 90 to 100 weeks of age

31.4

(KG/K)

3.46

2.31

2.23

2.18

2.07

LIVEABILITY

(%)

90

94

94

94

95

HEN DAY RATE OF LAY AT 75 Weeks

(%)

55

74

76

77

82

BODYWEIGHT AT 18 Weeks

(KGS)

1.72

1.55

1.55

ADULT BODYWEIGHT

(KGS)

2.5

2.0

2.0

2.0

1.9


Input 1.50 Efficiency 1.50

6


7-11-2013

Trends in Commercial Turkeys Heavy Toms Large White Males

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

Processing weight (kg at 20 weeks of age)

13.8

15.9

18.48

20.37

22.0

Feed conversion

2.88

2.76

2.57

2.43

2.22

Feed conversion*

3.35

3.07

2.71

2.43

2.05

99

114

132

146

157

Daily weight gain (g/day)

Input Efficiency

*: adjusted for body weight differences 13

Trends in Pig Breeding 1000

780

900 800

520

600

850

950

4.5

715

4

700 600

5

3.5

3.20

3

3.00

500

2.80

2.70

2.5

2.55

400

2.15

2

300

1.5

200

1

100

0.5

0

0

1970

1980

1990

Daily Gain (25-120 kg)

2000

2010

2020

Feed Conversion (25-120 kg)

Input Efficiency 14


7


7-11-2013

Trends in broiler breeding

Trait

1980

1990

2000

2010

2012

Body wght @ 42 days (g)

1135

1588

2042

2495

2585

Feed Conversion Ratio

2.40

2.20

2.00

1.80

1.76

Breast meat (%)

12.2

15.2

19.2

23.2

24.0

Source: Cobb Vantress 15

Genetic progress reduces feed use by production industry Feed used1 per unit of product2

Annual genetic progress

Laying hen

2.5

-19 grams/kg

Turkey

3.2

-61 grams/kg

Pig

4.0

-48 grams/kg

Species

1 Feed

used by parent stock and production animals carcass for meat species; eggs for laying hens

Input Efficiency

2 Product:


8


7-11-2013

Comparison Efficiency of Meat Species

17

Energy and Protein Efficiency of Animal Production Energy Efficiency (%)

Protein Efficiency (%)

Dairy Cows

22

28

Beef

6

10

Sheep

6

9

Pigs

21

31

Broilers

28

52

Turkeys

19

48

Laying Hens

14

25

Source: Tolkamp et al, SAC report, 2010 18


9


7-11-2013

Feed Use Efficiency in Common Aquaculture Species Feed Conversion Ratio 2.2

Crude protein in feed (%) 2,0

1.8

45

43

1.2

1,0

28

35

32

Source: C.E. Boyd et al, Reviews in Fisheries Sci. 2007, 15, 327-360 19

Comparative Efficiency of Meat Species

Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) Feed supplied Body weight gained

Protein Conversion Ratio (PCR) Feed protein supplied Body protein gained

20


10


7-11-2013

Protein Efficiency Compared Across Species 10.40

10.00

Pig Chicken Beef Salmon

2.99 1.69

1.80

4.14 3.23

Tilapia

1.92

2.32

1.00

Feed Conversion Ratio

Protein Conversion Ratio

Sources: C.E. Boyd et al, Reviews in Fisheries Sci. 2007, 15, 327-360 and Tolkamp et al, SAC report, 2010 21

Profit/Benefit

BREEDING for the

BENEFIT of

ALL

Over the long term, profit is essential for the life of a business and for becoming more sustainable. And breeding is a powerful tool that can significantly impact profitability, animals, the planet and people.


11


7-11-2013

Multiplication Factors

♀

1

1

1

PL

Grand Parent

80

40

15

GP

Parent stock

6.400

1600

263

PS

Commercial products

550.000

128.000

18.375

CP

180.000.000 eggs

1.750.000 kg. turkey

1.727.250 kg. pork

Pure line

Output

Based on lifetime production


23

Biosecurity 1. Policies and protocols 2. Isolation of facilities 3. Back ups across continents 4. High frequency diagnostics

Bio Security


12


7-11-2013

Planet Minimizing environmental impact in livestock production is a key part of what we do everyday, from our nucleus units to our customers’ farms, we are continuously improving input efficiency and helping reduce the use of chemicals.


Use of Chemicals

Input Efficiency

Planet

Life Cycle Assessment

Cradle to farm gate

Cradle to farm gate



13


7-11-2013

LCA: effects of separate input factors on environmental footprint (turkey production) Global warming potential

Land use

Acidification potential

Eutrophication potential

Energy use

27

Comparative Environmental Footprints of Turkey, Broiler And Pork Production (turkey=1)

Global Warming Potential

Acidification Potential

Eutrophication Potential

Land Use

Energy Use

28


14


7-11-2013

LCA turkey production: relative effect of genetic selection traits on environmental impacts


Reduction of Environmental Outputs (%) by introduction of 500 egg layer by ISA

GWP Global Warming Potential

AP Acidification Potential

EP Eutrophication Potential

EU Energy Use

LU Land Use

ISA Brown

-6.6

-15.1

-9.6

-6.9

-6.9

Bovans brown

-5.9

-14.7

-9.0

-6.3

-6.1

Dekalb White

-6.5

-15.3

-9.6

-6.8

-6.7

Breed

Table 19. Reduction in percentage (%) when producing 500 eggs in 100 weeks compared to 360 eggs in 80 weeks

From: MSc thesis Christianne van Winkoop, 2013



15


7-11-2013

Footprint reduction through progress in pig breeding GHG

Acidification

Eutrophication

(Greenhouse gas emission)

(kg SOS SO2 output)

(kg N/N and P output)

2011 Blup

-0.5%

-0.9%

-1.4%

-1.3%

2011 Genomics

- 0.6%

-1.14%

-1.79%

-1,68%

2060 Blup

-16%

-30%

-46%

-45%

-27%

-44%

-60%

-58%

2060 Genomics


BREEDING for the

BENEFIT of

ALL


16


7-11-2013

Shift of breeding goals 1950 - 2025

BREEDING for the BENEFIT of ALL

From: Neeteson, Knap & Avendano, 2013, Animal Frontiers,3, 52-57 Copyright Hendrix Genetics

33

Animals

Bio Security

Genetic Resources

Welfare

Animals

All of us at Hendrix Genetics have a special respect for animals and their welfare. And as suppliers of breeding stock to the world, we have a unique responsibility for biosecurity and animal health. Finally, as breeders, it is in our best interest to protect genetic resources for the future.


17


7-11-2013

Balanced Breeding

Production Efficiency Product Quality Health & Welfare

BREEDING for the BENEFIT of ALL Copyright Hendrix Genetics

35

Code EFABAR adopted across all HG divisions

Welfare


18


7-11-2013

Conservation of genetic diversity Management and safety of gene pools • Control of inbreeding levels in closed populations • Back ups across countries and continents • Contribution to gene banks in France, Netherlands, Canada

Genetic Resources

Genetic profiling of turkey populations

Genetic Resources Copyright Hendrix Genetics


19


7-11-2013

The Global Challenge

50

70%

100%

years

from now the world population will require

of this food must come from efficiencyimproving technology

more food, and

Source: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization 39

The egg supply chain 2

Breeders

Hatcheries

700

Egg producers Processors

70,000

Packers

Retailers

Consumers Copyright Hendrix Genetics


100/1,000 500 7,000,000,000 40

20


7-11-2013

Power in the Value Chain France 2011

-

+

Added value

2 million products… 58.000 501.000

30

industrial manufacturing companies

Farms

multinationals

11.500

2.850

IAA

Agri-coops

80% of all distributor purchases

6 buying groups (85%)

65 millions consumers

Source : O.Mevel, 2011 41

Who makes the margins? Margin Consumer product

Primary production

Food producers

Retailers

A-brand products

0

+

0

Private label products

0

0

+

42


21


7-11-2013

Who makes the margins? Margin Consumer product

Primary production

Food producers

Retailers

A-brand products

0

+

0

Private label products

0

0

+

Innovative products

+

+

0 43

(Higher) margins to primary production • Innovation!!! The success of capitalism is in “market tested innovations” (Deirdre McCloskey) • Some protection of return on R&D investments: • • • •

Patenting Branding Uniqueness Speed of innovation

• Innovations as joint effort of primary production

44


22



7-11-2013

23

Duurzame fokkerij. Vlaamse Fokkerijdag. Leuven 6 november Gerard Albers. Hendrix Genetics

Recommend Documents