DAFTAR PUSTAKA. Anderson & Krathwohl. (2001). Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Assesmen. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

80

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abraham, M.R., Renner J.W. (1986). The Sequence of Learning Cycle Activity in High School Chemistry. J. of Research in Science Teaching. Vol 23 (2), pp 121-143 Acisli, S., Yalcin, S. A., & Turgut, U. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 15: 2459–2462. Anderson & Krathwohl. (2001). Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Assesmen. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar. Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Bently and Ebert. (2007). Teaching Constructivist Science K-8. Corwin Press Hal 117-119. B.L. Gerber, A.M. Cavallo, & E.A. Marek. (2001). “Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability,”. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5):535-549. Bullock, M. (1996). Development of Reasioning Competences in Early and Later Childhood. Dalam E. DeCorte & F.E. Weinert: International Encyclopedia Developmental and Instructional Psychology. Kidlington, Oxford: Elssevier Science Ltd. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A. & andes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins and effectiveness. Office Of Science Education National Institutes Of Health. Vol. 3: 1-80. Bybee, R.W. (2009). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model and 21 ST Century Skills. Paper for a Workshop On Exploring The Intersection of Science Education and The Development of 21st Century Skill. C. Zimmerman. (2005) The Development of Scientific Reasoning: What psychologists contribute to an Understanding of Elementary Science Learning. Paper commissioned by the National Academies of Science (National Research Council’s Board of Science Education, Consensus Study on Learning Science, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade).

Nurul Kami Sani, 2015 PENERAPAN MOD EL PEMBELAJARAN LEARNING CYCLE 7E UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP D AN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN ILMIAH SISWA SMA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu|perpustakaan.upi.edu

81

http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Corinne_Zimmerman_Final_Paper.p df Carin, A.A. (1993). Teaching Modern Science, 6th ed. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International. Carin , A.A. & R.B. Sund. (1985). Teahcing Science Through Discovery, 5th ed. Colombus: Charles E. Merril. Cavallo, A. M. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students’ understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics. Journal of research in science teaching, 33, 625-656. Christine, V. (2010). The Nature of Science and The Scientific Method. Durham: The Geological Society of America. Colburn, A. & Clough, M.P. (1997). Implementing the Learning Cycle: A Gradual Transition to a New Teaching Approach. The Science Teacher, 64(5):30-33. Dahar, R. W. (1989). Teori-teori belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga. Dasna, I.Wayan. (2007). Kajian Implementasi Model Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle) dalamPembelajaran Kimia. Makalah Seminar Nasional MIPA dan Pembelajarannya. FMIPAUM-Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas. Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum 2006 : Standar Kompetensi, Mata Pelajaran Fisika, Sekolah Menengah Atas dan Madrasah Aliyah, Jakarta: Depdiknas. Dolan, E. & Grady, J. (2009). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by Inquiry. Journal Science Teacher Education. Vol. 21: 31-55. Dryden, G & J. Vos. (2000). Revolusi Cara Belajar (The Learning Revolusion), Bagian 1. Bandung: Kaifa. Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E Models. The Science Teacher. Published by the National Science Teachers Association, 1840 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, V A 22201-3000. Erduran, S., & Maria, Pj., (2008). Argumentation in Science Education. London: Spinger Science.


82

Fajaroh, F., Dasna, I.W. (2013). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle UntukMeningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Zat Aditif Dalam BahanMakanan Pada Siswa Kelas Ii Smu Negeri 1 Tumpang-Malang. Jurnal Pendidikandan Pembelajaran Vol 11 (2) Oktober 2004, hal 112-122 Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores Dept. of Physics, Indiana University 24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA, 91367 USA.USA:Indiana University http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf Henny. (2012). Penerapan Pembelajaran Generatif Dengan Strategi Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Materi Fluida Statis. Tesis FP-IPA UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Huang. (2008). Implementing the Learning Cycle: A Gradual Transition to a New Teaching Approach. The Science Teacher, 64(5):30-33. Karplus, R., et al., (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 14(2): 169-175. Kanli, U. & Yagbasan, R. (2007). The effects of laboratory based on the 7E learning cycle model and verification laboratory approach on the development of students science process skill and conceptual achievement. [Online] tersedia: http://na-serv.did.gu.se/ESERA2007/pdf/223.pdf [01 maret 2014] Kemendikbud. (2013). Pedoman Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud. Khan, M., & Iqbal, M. Z. (2011). Effect of inkuiri lab teaching Method on the development of scientific skills through the teaching of biology in Pakistan. Strength for today and bright hope for tomorrow journal. Kuhn. (2010). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed, v (94) :810-824. Koray, Ö., & Köksal, M. S. (2009). The effect of creative and critical thinking based laboratory applications on creative and logical thinking abilities of prospective teachers. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching Journal , 10(2), 1-13. Krulik, S. & Rudnick, A. (1996). The New Source forTeaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Junior and Senior High School.USA: Allyn and Bacon. Nurul Kami Sani, 2015 PENERAPAN MOD EL PEMBELAJARAN LEARNING CYCLE 7E UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP D AN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN ILMIAH SISWA SMA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu|perpustakaan.upi.edu

83

Lawson, A.E. (1991). Exploring Growth (& Mitosis) Through a Learning Cycle. The American Biology Teacher, 53(2):107-110. Lawson, A.E. (1992). The Development of Reasoning Among College Biology Students-A Review of Research. Journal of College Science Teaching, May 1992:338-344. Lawson, A.E. (1996). Introduction Mendelian Genetic Through a Learning Cycle. The American Biology Teacher, 58(1): 38-42. Lawson, A. E. (2000). Development and Validation of the Classroom Test of Formal Reasoning. Journal of research in science teaching, 15(1), 11-24. Revised Edition. Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R., Clark, B. R., & Falconer, K. A. (2000). What kinds of scientific concepts exist? Concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 37(9): 996-1018. Liao, Ya Wen & Ching, S.H. (2009).. “Enchancing Eight Grade Students’ Scientific conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning through a Web-based Learning Program”. Journal of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS). 12, (4), 228-240. Lorsbach, A. (2006). Learning Cycle as a tool for planning science instruction . Tersedia: http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/scienceed/lorsbach/257lrcy.htm

L.Bao, et al. (2009). Learning and Scientific Reasoning. SCIENCE VOL 323 Novak, Joseph D. dan Canas, Alberto J. (2008). Technical Report IHMC : The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. [Online : www.ihmc.us] Osborne, J., Erduran, S. & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing The Quality of Argumentation in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 994-1020. Renner, J.W., Abraham M.R.,Birnie, H.H. (1988). The Necessity of Each Phase of TheLearning Cycle ini Teaching High School Physics. J. of Research in Science Teaching.Vol 25 (1), pp 39-58.


84

R. N. Giere, J. Bickle, R. F. Mauldin. (2006). Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 5th edition, Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth. Santyasa. (2004). “Model Problem Solving dan Reasoning sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran Inovatif”. Makalah pada Konvensi Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia (Konaspi) V 5-9 Oktober 2004, Surabaya. Sampson, V., & Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teacher Can Use to Promote & Support Scientific Argumentation In the Biology Classroom. The American Biology Teacher, Vol.72 (7): 427-431. Shayer, M & Adey, P.S. (1993). Accelarating the Development of Formal Thinking in Middle and High School Student’s IV: Three years after a two-year intervention. Journal of research in science teaching, 30, 351-366. Silberman, M. (1996). Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach Any Subject. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Suherman, E. (2001). Evaluasi Proses dan Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alphabeta. Surapranata, S. (2009). Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalalm Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kanisius. Trianto. (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. Tumini. (2010). Penerapan Siklus Belajar 5E Pada Materi Bunyi Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP. Tesis Magister pada SPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan Wieman, C. (2007). Why Not Try a Scientific Approach to Science Education. Colorado: University of Colorado Press. Wilson, C., Taylor, J., Kowalski, S., and Carlson, J. (2009). The relative effects of inquiry based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge,


85

reasoning and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 47 (3): 276-301.


DAFTAR PUSTAKA. Anderson & Krathwohl. (2001). Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Assesmen. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

Recommend Documents