A LIBRARY RESEARCH ON HOW TO TEACH SPEAKING USING WORLD STYLE DEBATE
Compiled by
THESIS
By: ADITYA RISTIANANG K2211001
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY SURAKARTA 2016
i
PRONOUNCMENT
This is to certify that I myself write this thesis entitled “A Library Research on How to Teach Speaking Using World Style Debate”. It is not a product of plagiarism or made by others. Anything related to others’ works is written in quotations, the sources of which are listed on the bibliography. If then this pronouncement proves wrong, I am ready to accept any academic punishment including cancellation of my academic degree.
Surakarta, July 2016
AdityaRistianang
ii
APPROVAL HOW TO TEACH SPEAKING USING WORLD STYLE DEBATE (A Library Research)
A THESIS
By:
AdityaRistianang NIM. K2211001
This thesis has been approved by the consultants to be examined by the Board of Examiners of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of SebelasMaret University.
Approved by:
Consultant 1
Consultant 2
Prof. Dr. H. JokoNurkamto, M.Pd
Drs. Siswantoro, M.Hum
NIP. 19610124 198702 1 001
NIP. 19541009198503 1 001
iii
LEGALIZATION OF EXAMINER This thesis has been examined by the Board of Thesis Examiners of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University and accepted as partial fulfillment for the requirements for achieving Undergraduate Degree of Education in English. Day : Date
:
Board of Examiners: 1. Chairman Teguh Sarosa, S.S., M.Hum NIP. 197302052006041001 2. Secretary Hefy Sulistyawati, S.S., M.Pd NIP. 197812082001122002 3. Examiner 1 Prof. Dr. H. Joko Nurkamto, M.Pd NIP. 19610124 1987021001 4. Examiner 2 Drs. Siswantoro, M.Hum
( .............................................)
( .............................................)
( ..............................................)
( ...............................................)
NIP. 195410091985031001
Teacher Training and Education Faculty Sebelas Maret University The Dean,
Prof. Dr. H. Joko Nurkamto, M.Pd NIP. 19610124 198702 1001
iv
ABSTRACT ADITYA RISTIANANG, K2211001 How to Teach Speaking Using World Style Debate.First Consultant: Prof. Dr. H. Joko Nurkamto, M.Pd. Second Consultant : Drs. Siswantoro, M.Hum. Thesis: Surakarta. English Education Department, Graduate School, Sebelas Maret University, 2016. The objectives of this research are: (1) to describethe implementation of World Style debate to teach speaking; and (2) to explain how the World Style debate improve students’ speaking competence in Senior High School. The research is a result of library research entitled “How to Teach Speaking Using World Style Debate”. The data of the research obtained frombooks and scientific journals which are explained World Style debate or British Parliamentary debate. The research data were analyzed by using qualitative techniques through critical analysis. The research findings prove that the World Style debate is useful to teachspeaking, the benefit of World Style debate is viewed from several dimensions. First, World Style debate can improve students’ speaking ability, Second, World Style debate can improve the students’ involvement in learning process, Third, World Style debate also promote students’ critical thinking skill, Fourth, World Style debate can increase the motivation and excitement, Fifth, World Style debate can help the students to improve subject knowledge and easier to understand the material, Sixth, World Style debate can develop the students’ oral communication skill. World Style debate is a collaborative teaching strategy that benefits for students achievement and for students’ interest. As the suggestion, to develop the students’ speaking ability teacher should apply Wolds Style debate as an interesting activity to teach speaking skill. Key Words: World Style debate, speaking, library reseacrh
v
ABSTRACT ADITYA RISTIANANG, K2211001 How to Teach Speaking Using World Style Debate.First Consultant: Prof. Dr. H. Joko Nurkamto, M.Pd. Second Consultant : Drs. Siswantoro, M.Hum. Thesis: Surakarta. English Education Department, Graduate School, Sebelas Maret University, 2016. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) untuk mendeskripsikan implementasi debate World Style untuk mengajarke mampuan berbicara; dan (2)untuk menjelaskan bagaimana debate World Style meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Penenlitian ini adalah hasil dari kajian pustaka berjudul “How to Teach Speaking Using World Style Debate”. Data dari penelitian ini didapat dari beberapa buku dan referensi-referensi ilmiah yang menjelaskan tentang debat World Style atau debat British Parliamentary, data dianalisa menggunakan tehnik kualitatif melalui analisis kritis. Penelitian mendapatkan bahwa debat World Style bermanfaat untuk mengajar kemampuan berbicara, manfaat tersebut dilihat dari beberapa aspek. Pertama, debat dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berbicarasiswa, kedua, debat dapat meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa dalam proses pembelajaran, ketiga debat juga meningkatkan kemampuan berfirkir kritis, keempat, deba tmeningkatkan motivasi dan keaktifan siswa dalam mengikuti proses pembelajaran, kelima, debat membantu siswa untuk mengembangkan pengetahuan dan mempermudah untuk mengerti materi belajar, keenam, debat dapat mengembangkan kemampuan berkomunikasi secara langsung. Debat World Style adalah strategi pembelajaran kolaboratif yang bermanfaat untuk prestasi dan minatsiswa. Sebagai saran, untuk mengembangkan kemampua nberbicarasiswa, guru diharapkan menerapkan debat World Style secara menarik untuk mengajarkan kemampuan berbicara. Kata Kunci: debat World Style, berbicara, kajian pustaka
vi
MOTTO “Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get it.” Dalai Lama
vii
DEDICATION
This thesis is whole-heartedly dedicated to my beloved mother and father for the endless love, care, prayer, and support to keep on struggling to get a better future. Words will never enough to replace all that I have got from them.
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Alhamdulillahirabbil’alamin. Praise to Allah SWT, the Merciful Lord, for all His abundant blessing, mercies, and guidance, hence I can accomplish the writing of this thesis. In this occasion, I would like to acknowledge my deepest gratitude and appreciation to the following: 1. Prof. Dr. Joko Nurkamto, M.Pd, the Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University and my first thesis consultant, for every precious time, critism, advice, comments, and motivation of this thesis writing. 2. Teguh Sarosa, S.S, M.Hum, the Head of English Department, for his permission to write the thesis. 3. Drs. Siswantoro, M.Hum, my second thesis consultant, for every precious time, reading these pages and contributing valuable comments, advice, and motivation to make it better and worthy to read. 4. All of the lecturers in English Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University, for all knowledge shared. 5. All the friends who cannot be mentioned one by one, for their supports. Finally I sincerely hope that this thesis is beneficial for writers, teachers, and students. Any criticism is wellcome for the better research in the future.
Surakarta, July 2016
Aditya Ristianang
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER PAGE ............................................................................................... PRONOUNCEMENT .................................................................................... APPROVAL……......................................................................................... LEGITIMATION.............................................................................................. ABSTRACT……………............................................................................... MOTTO ......................................................................................................... DEDICATION ............................................................................................... ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................. TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................... LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................... LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................... LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................ CHAPTER I:
CHAPTER II:
CHAPTER III:
i ii iii iv v vii viii ix x xii xiii xiv
INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study ............................................ B. Problem statements ..................................................... C. The Objective of the Study ......................................... D. The benefit of the study .............................................. E. Research Methodology ...............................................
1 5 5 6 7
A. SPEAKING SKILL 1. Elements of Speaking Skill................................... 2. Micro and Macro Skills of Speaking.................... 3. Types of Speaking……………………………… 4. Teaching Speaking……………………………… 5. Type of Classroom Speaking Performance…….. 6. Speaking Assessment…………………………...
11 12 14 17 20 22
B. DEBATE METHOD 1. Definition of Debate…………............................. 2. Types of Debate…................................................ 3. Definition of World Style Debate........................ 4. Term in World Style Debate................................. 5. World Style Debate Formats...…………………..
27 28 31 32 36
x
CHAPTER IV:
C. TEACHING SPEAKING USING WORLD STYLE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Rationale............................................................... Procedure ............................................................. Prerequisite……………………………………... Advantages……………………………………... Disadvantages...................................................... Assumption……………………………………...
CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, AND SUGGESTION A. Conclusion ................................................................. B. Implication ................................................................. C. Suggestion……........................................................... BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... APPENDICES............................................................ ...................................
39 45 53 54 56 57
CHAPTER V:
xi
59 60 60 62 66 67
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1 Table 2.2 Table 4.1 Table 4.2 Table 4.3 Table 4.4 Table 4.5
Oral Presentation Assessment…......................................... Rating Points Oral Presentation Assessment …….………... Agreement and Disagreement Material……………………. Timeline Debate…………………………………………… Debate Rule………………………………………………... Hypothetical Scenario………………….………………….. Scoring Rubric……………………………………………...
xii
25 26 46 49 49 50 51
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1
The Information Environment…………………………….
8
Figure 1.2
Components of Data Analysis Classroom…………………
9
Figure 4.1
Classroom Setting…….........................................................
48
Figure4.2
Debate System ....................................................................
50
xiii
LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1
Lesson Plans....................................................................
xiv
66
