13. Freeman, R., 1999, The Psychology of Dental Patient Care : Barriers to Accessing Dental Care : Patient Factor, British Dental Journal., Vol

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Petersen, PE, Yamamoto T.Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO global oral health programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemial.2005;33:81-92 2. Martono, H., 2008, Gerakan Nasional Pemberdayaan Lanjut Usia, Gemari, Juni 2008, Tahun XI, edisi 89, h.66 3. Departemen Kesehatan RI, 2001, Pedoman Pembinaan Kesehatan Usia Lanjut bagi Petugas Kesehatan, ed 5, Jakarta. 4. Martono, H., 2008, Gerakan Nasional Pemberdayaan Lanjut Usia, Gemari, Juni 2008, Tahun XI, edisi 89, h.66 5. Nugroho, W., 2008, Keperawatan Gerontik dan Geriatik, ed 3, EGC, Jakarta, h 02. 6. Papas AS. Geriatric Dentistry, Aging and Oral Health. CV Mosby. St Louis. 1991. p: 71-3 7. Agtini MD. Presentase pengguna protesa di Indonesia. Media Litbang Kesehatan. 2010; 2. P: 50-58. 8. McMillan AS, Wong MCM. Emotional Effects of Tooth Loss in Community-Dwelling Elderly People in Hong Kong.Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 172-76 9. John MT et al. Demographic Factor, Denture Status and Oral HealthRelated Quality of life. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004; 32: 125-32. 10. Anonim, 2004, Access to Dental Care In Australia, Australian Dental Journal., Vol.49 (4) p.206-208. 11. World Health Organization. WHOoQL : Measuring Quality of Life. Swizerland: World Health Organization; 1997.p.1-4. 12. Barnes IE. Perawatan Gigi Terpadu untuk lansia Ggerodontology). Butterworth Heinemann Ltd. 1994. p: 26-41.

41

42

13. Freeman, R., 1999, The Psychology of Dental Patient Care : Barriers to Accessing Dental Care : Patient Factor, British Dental Journal., Vol.187 p.141-144 14. Caglayan, F,. Altun, O., Miloglu, O., Kaya, M., dan Yilmaz, A., 2009, Correlation Between Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHQoL) and Oral Disorders in a Turkish Patient Population, Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Buccal,14(11):573-578, http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v14i11/medoralv14i11p5 73,pdf, 21/01/14 15. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2003, Pedoman Tata Laksana Gizi Usia Lanjut untuk Tenaga Kesehatan, Direktorat Gizi Masyarakat Direktorat Bina Kesehatan Masyarakat, Jakarta. 16. Rutkauskas JS Clinical Dicision Making in Geriatric Dentistry. The Dental Clinics of North America. 1997;41. P:658. 17. Bianco VC, Rubo JH. Aging, Oral Health and Quality of Life. Periodontal Disease – A Clinician’s Guide 2010. P: 357-68. 18. Greenberg MS. Butket’s Oral Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment, BC Decker Inc. 10 ed.2003. p:613-17. 19. Tumer DT, Ship JA, Dry Mouth and its Effect on The Oral Health of Elderly People, J.Am Dent Assoct. 2007; 138 :15S-20S. 20. Musacchio E et al. Tooth Loss in the Eldery and its Association with Nutritional Status, Socio-economic and Lifestyle Factors. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2007 ; 65 : 78-86. 21. Ahmad SF. An Insigh into The Masticatory Performance of Complete Denture Wearer. Annals of Dentistry University of Malaya. 2006; 13 : 24-33. 22. Dogan BG, Gokalp S. Tooth Loss and Edentulism in The Turkish Elderly. Archives Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2012; 54 : 162-66. 23. Sundjaja Y. Attitudes of Saudi male patients toward the replacement of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90 :572-7

43

24. Muller F, Schimmel M Tooth Loss and Dental Prostheses in The Oldes Old. Europan Griatric Medicine. 2010; 1 :39-43. 25. Mc Cord,J.F., Grand,A., Youngson,C., Watson,R.M., Davis,D.M., 2003, Missing Teeth A Guide to Treatment Options, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, h.11-15. 26. Osterberg, T., Era,P., Gause-Nilsson, I., Steen, B., 1995, Dental State and Functional Capacity in 75 Yeart Olds in Three Nordic Localities, J Oral Rehabil., 22:653-660. 27. Okada,K.,

Enoki,H.,

Izawa,S.,

Iguchi,A.,

Kuzuya,M.,

2010,

Association Between Masticatory Performance And Anthropometric Measurement and Nutional Status in the Elderly, Geriatri. Gerontol. In January 10(1) :56-63 28. Hugo, F.N., Hilgert, J.B.,de Sousa, M.L.R.,da Silva,D.D.,Pucca Jr G.A.,2007, Correlates of Partial Tooth Loss and Edentulism in the Brazilian Elderly, Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol.,35 :224-232. 29. Davis,DM.,Fiske,J.,Scott,B., Radford, D.R., 2000, The Emotional Effect of Tooth Loss : A Preliminary Quantitative Study, Br.Dent.J.,188: 503-506. 30. Preshaw,P.M., Walls, A.W.G.,Jacobovics, N.S.,Moynihan,P.J.,Jepson, N.J.A, Loewy,Z., 2011, Association of Removable Partial Denture Use with Oral and Systemic Health, J.Dent, 39: 711-719 31. Abnet,C.C. ,Qiao, Y.I., Dawscy,S.M. 2005, Tooth loss is Associated with Increased Risk of Total Death and Death from Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer, Heart Disease, and Stroke in A Chinese Population-Based Cohort.Int.J.of Epidemiol., 34: 467-74 32. Park, K.,2007, Concept of Health and Disease, dalam Park, K., (ed), Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Sosial Medicine, 19th

ed.,

Banarsidas Bhanot Publisher, jabalpur, 12-47. 33. Mehrstedt, M., Tonnies, S., and Micheelis, W., 2007, Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with Dental Anxiety, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(5):357-363.

44

34. Haryanto AG, Anton Margo, Lusiana KB, Freddy Suryatenggara, Indra Setiabudi,1991, Ilmu Geligi Tiruan Sebagian Lepasan.jakarta: Hipokatres 35. Roy,T.,2002, Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the Link, J.Eco.History, 62(2): 611-612. 36. Rusanen, Jana,et al. Quality of Lifein patient with severe malocclusion before treatment. Finlandia : Europian Journal of Orthodontics.2009. 37. Harris, N.O, 2004. Introduction to Primery Preventive Dentristry, dalam: Harris, N.O dan Garcia-Godoy, F: Primary Preventive Dentristry, 6th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 38. GD, slade and Aj. Spencer. NCBI. Pub med.hov [ online][cited :Januari 18,2014]. http//www.ncbi.nml.nih./gov/pubmed/8193981 39. Wangasaraharja K, Dharmawan OV, Kasim E. Hubungan antara kesehatan mulut dengan kualitas hidup terkait kualitas pada usia lanjut. Universa Medicina. 2007:26(4) :18809

45

Lampiran 1. Etichal Clearence

46

Lampiran 2. Surat ijin penelitian

47

48

Lampiran 3. Informed consent

INFORMED CONSENT

PENELITIAN PERBEDAAN KUALITAS HIDUP PASIEN GERIATRI DI RSUP. DR. KARIADI SEMARANG YANG MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI DAN TIDAK MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI Setelah mendengar penjelasan dan diberi kesempatan untuk mengajukan pertanyaan-pertanyaan mengenai tujuan, manfaat, prosedur, lamanya waktu, dan resiko penelitian ini, saya atas nama pribadi memahami tujuan, manfaat, prosedur, lamanya waktu, dan resiko penelitian ini serta bersedia tanda tangan dibawah ini secara sukarela untuk berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini: Nama

: ..........................................................................................................

Jenis kelamin : .......................................................................................................... Umur

: ..........................................................................................................

Alamat

: .......................................................................................................... ..........................................................................................................

No Telp/Hp

: ..........................................................................................................

Dengan ketentuan apabila ada hal-hal yang tidak berkenan pada saya, maka saya berhak mengajukan pengunduran diri dari penelitian ini.

Semarang,...../...../2014 Peneliti

Responden

(Wahyu Wijayanti)

(.........................................) Saksi

(.....................................)

49

Lampiran 4. Kuisioner OHIP-14

Kuisioner Oral Health Impact Profile -14

Pertanyaan-pertanyaan pada kuisioner ini menanyakan tentang keluhan-keluhan yang Anda rasakan akibat permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda dalam satu bulan terakhir. Contoh: Seberapa sering Anda merasakan Tidak Sangat keluhan ini dalam satu bulan pernah jarang terakhir Apakah Anda memiliki kesulitan 0 1 dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut?

Kadangkadang 2

Sering Sangat sering 3

4

Jika selama satu bulan terakhir Anda sering merasa kesulitan dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda, maka Anda melingkari pilihan no 3. Seberapa sering Anda merasakan Tidak Sangat keluhan ini dalam satu bulan pernah jarang terakhir Apakah Anda memiliki kesulitan 0 1 dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut?

Kadangkadang 2

Sering Sangat sering 3

4

Sekarang buka halaman selanjutnya dan dimohon untuk menjawab semua pertanyaan yang ada. Jika Anda kurang mengerti mengenai maksud dari pertanyaan tersebut, dimohon untuk menanyakan kepada petugas yang mendampingi Anda. Setelah semua pertanyaan terjawab, dimohon untuk mengumpulkan kuisioner ini kepada petugas yang mendampingi Anda.

50

Kuisioner Oral Health Impact Profile -14

Seberapa sering Anda merasakan Tidak keluhan ini dalam satu bulan terakhir pernah Apakah Anda pernah merasa kesulitan 0 dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak dapat 0 mengecap rasa dengan baik karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasakan sakit 0 pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak 0 nyaman saat mengunyah makanan karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa kawatir 0 /cemas karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa ‘tegang‘ 0 karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak puas 0 dengan makanan yang anda konsumsi karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Pernahkah Anda harus berhenti secara 0 tiba-tiba saat sedang mengunyah makanan karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah mengalami 0 kesulitan untuk merasa rileks/santai karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa malu 0 karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah menjadi mudah 0 tersinggung karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah melakukan 0 kesulitan untuk melakukan kegiatan sehari-hari karena permasalahan pada

Sangat jarang 1

Kadangkadang 2

Sering Sangat sering 3 4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

51

rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa hidup anda kurang memuaskan karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda? Apakah Anda pernah merasa susah untuk melakukan apapun karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

52

Lampiran 5. Formulir data sampel

PENELITIAN PERBEDAAN KUALITAS HIDUP PASIEN GERIATRI DI RSUP. DR. KARIADI SEMARANG YANG MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI DAN TIDAK MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI

I.

IDENTITAS Nama

: ..............................................................................................

Jenis kelamin : .............................................................................................. Umur

: ..............................................................................................

Alamat

: .............................................................................................. ...............................................................................................

No Telp/Hp

II.

III.

: ..............................................................................................

DIAGNOSA Diagnosa perawatan gigi

:

Ya

/

Tidak

TOTAL SKOR OHIP-14

:

........................point

53

Lampiran6. Hasil uji analisis statistik

Frequencies

Jenis kel amin

Valid

Laki-laki Perempuan Total

Frequency 18 22 40

Percent 45.0 55.0 100.0

Valid Percent 45.0 55.0 100.0

Cumulat iv e Percent 45.0 100.0

OHIP.1

Valid

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total

Percent 52.5

Valid Percent 52.5

Cumulative Percent 52.5

11 4

27.5 10.0

27.5 10.0

80.0 90.0

3

7.5

7.5

97.5

1 40

2.5 100.0

2.5 100.0

100.0

Frequency 21

OHIP.2

Valid

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering Total

Percent 45.0 15.0

Valid Percent 45.0 15.0

Cumulative Percent 45.0 60.0

11 5

27.5 12.5

27.5 12.5

87.5 100.0

40

100.0

100.0

Frequency 18 6

54

OHIP.3

Valid


Percent 35.0

Valid Percent 35.0


6 10

15.0 25.0

15.0 25.0

50.0 75.0

7

17.5

17.5

92.5

3 40

7.5 100.0

7.5 100.0

100.0

Frequency 14

OHIP.4

Valid

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering

Frequency 13 1

Percent 32.5 2.5



3

7.5

7.5

42.5

sangat sering

6 17

15.0 42.5

15.0 42.5

57.5 100.0

Total

40

100.0

100.0

OHIP.5

Valid


Percent 50.0

Valid Percent 50.0


1 7

2.5 17.5

2.5 17.5

52.5 70.0

8 4

20.0 10.0

20.0 10.0

90.0 100.0

40

100.0

100.0

Frequency 20

55

OHIP.6

Valid


Percent 47.5

Valid Percent 47.5


3 4

7.5 10.0

7.5 10.0

55.0 65.0

9

22.5

22.5

87.5

5 40

12.5 100.0

12.5 100.0

100.0

Frequency 19

OHIP.7

Valid

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering

Frequency 13 7

Percent 32.5 17.5



3

7.5

7.5

57.5

sangat sering

3 14

7.5 35.0

7.5 35.0

65.0 100.0

Total

40

100.0

100.0

OHIP.8

Valid


Frequency 18

Percent 45.0

Valid Percent 45.0


4

10.0

10.0

55.0

12

30.0

30.0

85.0

5

12.5

12.5

97.5

1

2.5

2.5

100.0

40

100.0

100.0

56

OHIP.9

Valid


Percent 52.5

Valid Percent 52.5


5 8

12.5 20.0

12.5 20.0

65.0 85.0

4

10.0

10.0

95.0

2 40

5.0 100.0

5.0 100.0

100.0

Frequency 21

OHIP.10

Valid


Percent 52.5 25.0



4

10.0

10.0

87.5

3 2

7.5 5.0

7.5 5.0

95.0 100.0

40

100.0

100.0

Frequency 21 10

OHIP.11

Valid


Percent 52.5

Valid Percent 52.5


3 8

7.5 20.0

7.5 20.0

60.0 80.0

3 5

7.5 12.5

7.5 12.5

87.5 100.0

40

100.0

100.0

Frequency 21

57

OHIP.12

Valid

tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang

Percent 50.0 15.0



8 6

20.0 15.0

20.0 15.0

85.0 100.0

40

100.0

100.0

Frequency 20 6

sering Total

OHIP.13

Valid

tidak pernah sangat jarang

Percent 47.5 12.5



5

12.5

12.5

72.5

6 5

15.0 12.5

15.0 12.5

87.5 100.0

40

100.0

100.0

Frequency 19 5

kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total

OHIP.14

Valid

tidak pernah sangat jarang

Percent 50.0

Valid Percent 50.0


7 8

17.5 20.0

17.5 20.0

67.5 87.5

3

7.5

7.5

95.0

2 40

5.0 100.0

5.0 100.0

100.0

Frequency 20

kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total

Perawatan

Valid

Ya Tidak Total

Frequency 20 20 40

Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0

Valid Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0

Cumulat iv e Percent 50.0 100.0

58

59

Descriptives

Descriptive Statistics Umur Rerata skor kualitas hidup Valid N (listwise)

N 40 40 40

Minimum 61 .8571

Maximum 87 4.0000

Mean 72.58 2.710714

St d. Dev iation 7.136 1.1850002

Crosstabs

Umur * Perawatan Crosstabulation

Umur

Usila

Usila t ua

Total

Count % wit hin Perawatan % of Total Count % wit hin Perawatan % of Total Count % wit hin Perawatan % of Total

Perawatan Ya Tidak 13 14 65.0% 70.0% 32.5% 35.0% 7 6 35.0% 30.0% 17.5% 15.0% 20 20 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Total 27 67.5% 67.5% 13 32.5% 32.5% 40 100.0% 100.0%

60

Chi-Square Tests Value .114b .000 .114

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

df 1 1 1

.111

Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .736 1.000 .736

1

Exact Sig. (2-sided)


1.000

.500

.739

40

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6. 50.

Jenis kel amin * Perawatan Crosstabul ation

Jenis kelamin

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Total

Count % wit hin Perawatan % of Total Count % wit hin Perawatan % of Total Count % wit hin Perawatan % of Total

Perawatan Ya Tidak 7 11 35.0% 55.0% 17.5% 27.5% 13 9 65.0% 45.0% 32.5% 22.5% 20 20 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Total 18 45.0% 45.0% 22 55.0% 55.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 1.616b .909 1.628 1.576

df 1 1 1 1

Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .204 .340 .202



.341

.170

.209

40

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9. 00.

61

Explore

Jenis kelamin

Descriptives Kualitas hidup

Jenis kelamin Laki-laki

Perempuan

Mean 95% Conf idence Interv al f or Mean 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iat ion Minimum Maximum Range Interquart ile Range Skewness Kurt osis Mean 95% Conf idence Interv al f or Mean

Lower Bound Upper Bound


5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iat ion Minimum Maximum Range Interquart ile Range Skewness Kurt osis

Stat istic 20,28 12,69

Std. Error 3,594

27,86 20,25 25,50 232,565 15,250 0 41 41 31 -,202 -1,694 16,23 8,36

,536 1,038 3,785

24,10 15,59 3,50 315,136 17,752 0 44 44 33 ,519 -1,622

,491 ,953

Tests of Normality a

Kualitas hidup

Jenis kelamin Laki-laki Perempuan

Kolmogorov -Smirnov St at ist ic df Sig. ,179 18 ,134 ,289 22 ,000

a. Lillief ors Signif icance Correction

St at ist ic ,876 ,778

Shapiro-Wilk df 18 22

Sig. ,022 ,000

62

63

Kualitas hidup

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks Kualitas hidup

Jenis kelamin Laki-laki Perempuan Total

N 18 22 40

Mean Rank 21,72 19,50

Sum of Ranks 391,00 429,00

64

Test Statisticsb

Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W Z Asy mp. Sig. (2-tailed) Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]

Kualitas hidup 176,000 429,000 -,600 ,548 a

,563

a. Not corrected f or ties. b. Grouping Variable: Jenis kelamin

Explore

Umur

65

Descriptives Kualitas hidup

Umur Usila

Usila tua

Mean 95% Conf idence Interv al f or Mean 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iat ion Minimum Maximum Range Interquart ile Range Skewness Kurt osis Mean 95% Conf idence Interv al f or Mean



5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iat ion Minimum Maximum Range Interquart ile Range Skewness Kurt osis

Stat istic 17,22 10,98

Std. Error 3,037

23,47 16,89 15,00 249,103 15,783 0 41 41 32 ,202 -1,760 19,77 8,46

,448 ,872 5,189

31,07 19,52 20,00 350,026 18,709 0 44 44 38 ,152 -1,994

,616 1,191

Tests of Normality a

Kualitas hidup

Umur Usila Usila t ua

Kolmogorov -Smirnov St at ist ic df Sig. ,202 27 ,006 ,290 13 ,004

a. Lillief ors Signif icance Correction

Shapiro-Wilk St at ist ic df ,839 27 ,804 13

Sig. ,001 ,008

66

Kualitas hidup

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks Kualitas hidup

Umur Usila Usila tua Total

N 27 13 40

Mean Rank 19,74 22,08

Sum of Ranks 533,00 287,00

67

Test Statisticsb


Kualitas hidup 155,000 533,000 -,594 ,552 a

,568

a. Not corrected f or ties. b. Grouping Variable: Umur

Crosstabs

Perawatan * OHIP.1 Crosstabulation

Perawatan

Ya

Count % within P1 % of Total

Tidak

Count % within P1

tidak pernah 16 76.2% 40.0% 5

sangat jarang 4 36.4% 10.0% 7

P1 Kadang-k adang 0 .0% .0% 4

23.8% 12.5%

63.6% 17.5%

21 100.0% 52.5%

11 100.0% 27.5%

% of Total Count % within P1

Total

% of Total

sering 0 .0% .0% 3

sangat sering 0 .0% .0% 1

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20

100.0% 10.0%

100.0% 7.5%

100.0% 2.5%

50.0% 50.0%

4 100.0% 10.0%

3 100.0% 7.5%

1 100.0% 2.5%

40 100.0% 100.0%

Perawatan * OHIP.2 Crosstabulation P2

Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total

tidak pernah 17

sangat jarang 3

kadang-k adang 0

% within P2 % of Total Count % within P2

94.4% 42.5% 1 5.6%

50.0% 7.5% 3 50.0%

.0% .0% 11 100.0%

.0% .0% 5 100.0%

50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0%

% of Total Count % within P2 % of Total

2.5% 18 100.0% 45.0%

7.5% 6 100.0% 15.0%

27.5% 11 100.0% 27.5%

12.5% 5 100.0% 12.5%

50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%

Count

sering 0

Total 20

68


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Count % within P3 % of Total Count % within P3 % of Total Count

Total

% within P3 % of Total

tidak pernah 13

sangat jarang 3

P3 kadang-k adang 4

92.9% 32.5% 1 7.1%

50.0% 7.5% 3 50.0%

2.5% 14 100.0% 35.0%

sering 0

sangat sering 0

Total 20

40.0% 10.0% 6 60.0%

.0% .0% 7 100.0%

.0% .0% 3 100.0%

50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0%

7.5% 6 100.0%

15.0% 10 100.0%

17.5% 7 100.0%

7.5% 3 100.0%

50.0% 40 100.0%

15.0%

25.0%

17.5%

7.5%

100.0%

2 33.3% 5.0% 4 66.7% 10.0% 6

sangat sering 1 5.9% 2.5% 16 94.1% 40.0% 17

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0% 50.0% 40

100.0% 15.0%

100.0% 42.5%

100.0% 100.0%

1 12.5% 2.5% 7

sangat sering 0 .0% .0% 4

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Count % within P4 % of Total Count % within P4 % of Total

Total


tidak pernah 13 100.0% 32.5% 0 .0% .0% 13

sangat jarang 1 100.0% 2.5% 0 .0% .0% 1

P4 kadang-k adang 3 100.0% 7.5% 0 .0% .0% 3

100.0% 32.5%

100.0% 2.5%

100.0% 7.5%

sering


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total

Count % within P5 % of Total Count % within P5 % of Total Count % within P5 % of Total

tidak pernah 19 95.0% 47.5% 1

sangat jarang 0 .0% .0% 1

kadang-k adang 0 .0% .0% 7

5.0% 2.5%

100.0% 2.5%

100.0% 17.5%

87.5% 17.5%

100.0% 10.0%

50.0% 50.0%

20 100.0% 50.0%

1 100.0% 2.5%

7 100.0% 17.5%

8 100.0% 20.0%

4 100.0% 10.0%

40 100.0% 100.0%

sering

69


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak


Total


tidak pernah 19

sangat jarang 1

kadang-k adang 0

100.0% 47.5% 0 .0%

33.3% 2.5% 2 66.7%

.0% 19 100.0% 47.5%

sering 0

sangat sering 0

Total 20

.0% .0% 4 100.0%

.0% .0% 9 100.0%

.0% .0% 5 100.0%

50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0%

5.0% 3

10.0% 4

22.5% 9

12.5% 5

50.0% 40

100.0% 7.5%

100.0% 10.0%

100.0% 22.5%

100.0% 12.5%

100.0% 100.0%

0 .0% .0%

sangat sering 0 .0% .0%

Total 20 50.0% 50.0%


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Count % within P7 % of Total Count % within P7 % of Total Count % within P7

Total

% of Total

tidak pernah 13 100.0% 32.5%

sangat jarang 5 71.4% 12.5%

P7 kadang-k adang 2 66.7% 5.0%

0 .0%

2 28.6%

1 33.3%

3 100.0%

14 100.0%

20 50.0%

.0% 13 100.0% 32.5%

5.0% 7 100.0% 17.5%

2.5% 3 100.0% 7.5%

7.5% 3 100.0% 7.5%

35.0% 14 100.0% 35.0%

50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%

0 .0% .0% 5 100.0%

sangat sering 0 .0% .0% 1 100.0%

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0%

12.5% 5 100.0% 12.5%

2.5% 1 100.0% 2.5%

50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%

sering


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total


tidak pernah 18 100.0% 45.0% 0 .0%

sangat jarang 2 50.0% 5.0% 2 50.0%

P8 kadang-k adang 0 .0% .0% 12 100.0%

.0% 18 100.0% 45.0%

5.0% 4 100.0% 10.0%

30.0% 12 100.0% 30.0%

sering

70


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak


Total


tidak pernah 19

sangat jarang 1

kadang-k adang 0

90.5% 47.5% 2 9.5%

20.0% 2.5% 4 80.0%

5.0% 21 100.0% 52.5%

sering 0

sangat sering 0

Total 20

.0% .0% 8 100.0%

.0% .0% 4 100.0%

.0% .0% 2 100.0%

50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0%

10.0% 5

20.0% 8

10.0% 4

5.0% 2

50.0% 40

100.0% 12.5%

100.0% 20.0%

100.0% 10.0%

100.0% 5.0%

100.0% 100.0%

sangat sering 0 .0% .0% 2 100.0% 5.0% 2 100.0% 5.0%

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0% 50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%

sangat sering 0 .0% .0% 5 100.0% 12.5% 5 100.0% 12.5%

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0% 50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total


tidak pernah 18 85.7% 45.0% 3 14.3% 7.5% 21 100.0% 52.5%

sangat jarang 2 20.0% 5.0% 8 80.0% 20.0% 10 100.0% 25.0%

P10 kadang-k adang 0 .0% .0% 4 100.0% 10.0% 4 100.0% 10.0%

sering 0 .0% .0% 3 100.0% 7.5% 3 100.0% 7.5%


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total


tidak pernah 19 90.5% 47.5% 2 9.5% 5.0% 21 100.0% 52.5%

sangat jarang 0 .0% .0% 3 100.0% 7.5% 3 100.0% 7.5%

P11 kadang-k adang 1 12.5% 2.5% 7 87.5% 17.5% 8 100.0% 20.0%

sering 0 .0% .0% 3 100.0% 7.5% 3 100.0% 7.5%

71


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total


tidak pernah 19 95.0% 47.5% 1 5.0% 2.5% 20 100.0% 50.0%

sangat jarang 1 16.7% 2.5% 5 83.3% 12.5% 6 100.0% 15.0%

kadang-k adang 0 .0% .0% 8 100.0% 20.0% 8 100.0% 20.0%

sering 0 .0% .0% 6 100.0% 15.0% 6 100.0% 15.0%

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0% 50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total


tidak pernah 18 94.7% 45.0% 1 5.3% 2.5% 19 100.0% 47.5%

sangat jarang 2 40.0% 5.0% 3 60.0% 7.5% 5 100.0% 12.5%

P13 kadang-k adang 0 .0% .0% 5 100.0% 12.5% 5 100.0% 12.5%

sering 0 .0% .0% 6 100.0% 15.0% 6 100.0% 15.0%

sangat sering 0 .0% .0% 5 100.0% 12.5% 5 100.0% 12.5%

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0% 50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%

sangat sering 0 .0% .0% 2 100.0% 5.0% 2 100.0% 5.0%

Total 20 50.0% 50.0% 20 50.0% 50.0% 40 100.0% 100.0%


Perawatan

Ya

Tidak

Total


tidak pernah 19 95.0% 47.5% 1 5.0% 2.5% 20 100.0% 50.0%

sangat jarang 1 14.3% 2.5% 6 85.7% 15.0% 7 100.0% 17.5%

P14 kadang-k adang 0 .0% .0% 8 100.0% 20.0% 8 100.0% 20.0%

sering 0 .0% .0% 3 100.0% 7.5% 3 100.0% 7.5%

72

Explore

Perawatan

Descriptives Rerata skor kualit as hidup

Perawatan Ya

Tidak

Mean 95% Conf idence Interv al f or Mean 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance St d. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquart ile Range Skewness Kurt osis Mean 95% Conf idence Interv al f or Mean



5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance St d. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquart ile Range Skewness Kurt osis

St at ist ic .210714 .056002

St d. Error .0739181

.365427 .154762 .142857 .109 .3305717 .0000 1.4286 1.4286 .2500 2.938 9.995 2.367857 2.101462

.512 .992 .1272778

2.634253 2.396825 2.392857 .324 .5692038 1.0714 3.1429 2.0714 .7500 -.728 .199

.512 .992

Tests of Normal ity a

Rerata skor kualit as hidup

Perawatan Ya Tidak

Kolmogorov -Smirnov Stat istic df Sig. .331 20 .000 .096 20 .200*

*. This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. a. Lillief ors Signif icance Correction

Stat istic .631 .946

Shapiro-Wilk df 20 20

Sig. .000 .316

73

74

Rerata skor kualitas hidup

Rerata skor kualitas hidup

4.0000

3.0000

2.0000

16

1.0000 10

0.0000 Ya

Tidak

Perawatan

Means

Report Perawatan Tidak

Ya

Keterbat asan f ungsi Rasa sakit f isik Ketidakny aman psikis Ketidakmampuan f isik Ketidakmampuan psikis Ketdiakmampuan sosial Handikap

Mean .35 1.40 .20 .55 .15 .15 .15

N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

St d. Dev iation .489 1.818 .894 .887 .489 .671 .489

Mean 3.40 6.20 5.45 5.70 3.65 4.25 4.50

N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

St d. Dev iation 1.603 1.196 1.820 1.380 2.033 1.618 1.960

Total Mean 1.88 3.80 2.83 3.13 1.90 2.20 2.33

N 40 40 40 40 40 40 40

St d. Dev iation 1.937 2.866 3.012 2.848 2.296 2.409 2.615

75

Tests of Normal ity a

Keterbat asan f ungsi Rasa sakit f isik Ketidakny aman psikis Ketidakmampuan f isik Ketidakmampuan psikis Ketdiakmampuan sosial Handikap

Perawatan Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak

Kolmogorov -Smirnov St at ist ic df Sig. .413 20 .000 .146 20 .200* .279 20 .000 .184 20 .076 .538 20 .000 .219 20 .013 .382 20 .000 .386 20 .000 .520 20 .000 .125 20 .200* .538 20 .000 .178 20 .095 .520 20 .000 .128 20 .200*

*. This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. a. Lillief ors Signif icance Correction

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

St at ist ic .608 .960 .766 .922 .236 .905 .679 .751 .354 .966 .236 .951 .354 .937

Shapiro-Wilk df 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

Sig. .000 .535 .000 .108 .000 .050 .000 .000 .000 .666 .000 .383 .000 .212

76

Ranks Perawatan Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total

Keterbatasan f ungsi

Rasa sakit f isik

Ketidakny aman psikis

Ketidakmampuan f isik

Ketidakmampuan psikis

Ketdiakmampuan sosial

Handikap

N 20 20 40 20 20 40 20 20 40 20 20 40 20 20 40 20 20 40 20 20 40

Mean Rank 11.35 29.65

Sum of Ranks 227.00 593.00

10.95 30.05

219.00 601.00

10.75 30.25

215.00 605.00

10.63 30.38

212.50 607.50

11.73 29.28

234.50 585.50

10.75 30.25

215.00 605.00

11.10 29.90

222.00 598.00

Test Statisticsb


Keterbatasan f ungsi 17.000 227.000 -5.092 .000 a

.000

a. Not corrected f or ties. b. Grouping Variable: Perawatan

Rasa sakit f isik 9.000 219.000 -5.236 .000 a

.000

Ketidaknya man psikis 5.000 215.000 -5.612 .000 a

.000

Ketidakma mpuan f isik 2.500 212.500 -5.505 .000 a

.000

Ketidakmam puan psikis 24.500 234.500 -5.084 .000 a

.000

Ketdiakmam puan sosial 5.000 215.000 -5.598 .000 a

.000

Handikap 12.000 222.000 -5.391 .000 a

.000

77

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks Rerata skor kualit as hidup

Perawatan Ya Tidak Total

N 20 20 40

Test Statisticsb


Rerata skor kualit as hidup 2.000 212.000 -5.376 .000 a

.000

a. Not corrected f or ties. b. Grouping Variable: Perawatan

Mean Rank 10.60 30.40

Sum of Ranks 212.00 608.00

78

Lampiran 7. foto dokumentasi penelitian

13. Freeman, R., 1999, The Psychology of Dental Patient Care : Barriers to Accessing Dental Care : Patient Factor, British Dental Journal., Vol

Recommend Documents