WAKIL PENGAMAT DARI MASYARAKAT (WPM) Nama WPM : Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST.,MT Nama Paket : 05, Simpang Rampa - Poriaha Provinsi : Sumatera Utara

ANTI CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN (ACAP) RENCANA TINDAK ANTI KORUPSI (RTAK)

LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN SITE VISIT PENGADAAN JASA PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI Oleh:

WAKIL PENGAMAT DARI MASYARAKAT (WPM) Nama WPM : Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST.,MT Nama Paket : 05, Simpang Rampa - Poriaha Provinsi : Sumatera Utara AGUSTUS 2014

Medan, 28 September 2014

Nomor :Lampiran : 1 Berkas Perihal : Laporan Pemberisan Penjelasan (Aanwijzing)

Kepada Yth : Ketua Project Management Unit (PMU) WINRIP Direktorat Bina Program.Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum Jl. Patimura 20, Kebayoran Baru,Jakarta Selatan

Dengan Hormat, Sehubungan telah diadakannya Rapat Penjelasan ranggal Juli 2014 dan Kunjungan Lapangan tanggalJUli 2014, maka bersama ini kami sampaikan Laporan pemberian penjelasan (Aanwijzing)untuk Paket 5 Rampa-Poriaha.

Demikianlah, atas perhatian dan kerjasamanya disampaikan terimakasih.

WPM Paket 5 Rampa – Poriaha

Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST, MT

Tembusan disampaikan kepada Yth. 1. Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksana Jalan Nasional I Provinsi Sumatera Utara 2. Ketua Pokja SNVTPJN Wilayah I Provinsi Medan 3. Arsip

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

DAFTAR ISI

DAFTAR ISI I. II. III. IV.

i PENDAHULUAN DATA PAKET, PQ DAN PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN PENGAMATAN PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL DAN KUNJUNGAN LAPANGAN/PRE-BID MEETING AND SITE VISIT PENUTUP

DAFTAR LAMPIRAN

1 3 5 8 ii

i

KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BINA MARGA DIREKTORAT BINA PROGRAM PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (PMU)

WESTERN INDONESIA NATIONAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (WINRIP) IBRD LOAN No. 8043-ID

RENCANA TINDAK ANTI KORUPSI (RTAK) ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN (ACAP)

LAPORAN HASIL PENGAMATAN PROSES PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI

Nama WPM Nomor Paket Nama Paket Provinsi

: : : :

Medis Sejahtera Surbakti 05 Simpang Rampa - Poriaha Sumatera Utara

AGUSTUS 2014


LAPORAN HASIL PENGAMATAN PROSES PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI TAHAP PERTAMA BAGIAN I PENDAHULUAN Pemerintah Indonesia dengan Bank Dunia telah menandatangani Naskah Perjanjian Pinjaman (Loan Agreemnet) untuk Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No. 8043-ID pada tanggal 14 Desember 2011. Loan efektif 12 Maret 2012 dan akan berakhir pada tanggal 31 Desember 2017, senilai USD250 juta. Porsi sharing Loan dan GOI adalah 70:30 untuk Civil Works, dimana Pemerintah Indonesia menyediakan Dana USD 100 juta, sehingga total nilai proyek adalah USD 350 juta. Pinjaman tersebut akan digunakan untuk mendukung penguatan berkelanjutan Sistem Jaringan Jalan Nasional di wilayah Indonesia Barat,yaitu untuk pekerjaan jalan dan jembatan. Tujuan utama proyek WINRIP adalah untuk meningkatkan status jaringan yang sebelumnya berfungsi sebagai jalan provinsi atau jalan non status agar sesuai dengan standar yang baru yaitu jalan nasional; memastikan bahwa jaringan jalan nasional tersebut menjadi lebih lancar dan berkeamanan; dan mampu mendukung peningkatan ekonomi daerah. Sesuai dengan Schedule 2 Section IC Naskah Perjanjian Pinjaman WINRIP,dan Bab 11 Project Management Manual (PMM) WINRIP, Pemerintah Indonesia dan Bank Dunia menyepakati pelaksanaan Anti-Corruption Action Plan (ACAP) atau Rencana Tindak Anti Korupsi (RTAK) dalam pelaksanaan proyek. Adapun tujuan RTAK adalah untuk; 1. Mengidentifikasi resiko bagi pemerintah dan langkah-langkah pencegahan sehingga mencapai standard sistem kendali yang lebih baik dari yang telah dilakukan pada program-program sebelumnya. 2. Mengatasi semua resiko dalam bentuk rencana tindak yang dikendalikan oleh Ditjen. Bina Marga. 3. Mencapai pelaksanaan RTAK WINRIP yang sejalan dengan Pedoman Bank Dunia tentang Pencegahan dan Upaya Memerangi Penipuan dan Tindak Korupsi pada program-program yang didanai oleh Bank Dunia. Pelaksanaan komponen RTAK WINRIP pada dasarnya adalah dalam rangka peningkatan transparansi dalam proses pelaksanaan proyek dengan menarik pelajaran dan pengalaman dari pelaksanaan RTAK pada proyek-proyek sebelumnya agar lebih kuat dan efektif, dengan melakukan langkah-langkah pencegahan dan meningkatkannya pada pelaksanaan rencana tindak-nya. Berdasarkan pelajaran dan pengalaman pada proyek sebelumnya, maka RTAK yang akan dilakukan meliputi lima area sebagaimana Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

1


diformulasikan dalam Matrik Pemetaan Resiko Korupsi dan Rencana Tindak yaitu: a. b. c. d. e.

Meningkatkan Penyebarluasan Informasi dan Transparansi Meningkatkan Pemantauan yang dilakukan oleh Masyarakat Madani Meningkatkan Mekanisme Penanganan Pengaduan Pencegahan Kolusi serta Pemalsuan dan Resiko Penipuan, dan Penerapan Sanksi dan Tindakan Hukum

Sedangkan ruang linkup pelaksanaan RTAK atau ACAP meliputi komponen-komponen berikut: 1. Pelibatan Wakil Pengamat dari Masyarakat (WPM) / Community Representative Observers (CROs) dalam pemantauan atau pengamatan terhadap proses pelelangan / pengadaan jasa konstruksi. 2. Keterbukaan informasi kepada public / Public Disclosure. 3. Penanganan dan pengelolaan Pengaduan dari Masyarakat / Complaint Handling Mechanism System (CHS). 4. Pelibatan Pemantauan oleh Pihak Ketiga / Third Party Monitoring (TPM) dalam pemantauan proses konstruksi. WPM berperan sebagai kompone yang mewakili masyarakat madani dalam mengamati dan mencermati proses pelelangan / pengadaan jasa konstruksi untuk mencegah terjadinya praktek korupsi, kolusi, dan nepotisme, serta tindak pemalsuan dan resiko penipuan.

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

2


BAGIAN II DATA PAKET, PQ DAN PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN 1.

DATA POKOK No Paket Nama Paket Lokasi Paket Provinsi Satuan Kerja

2.

: Paket 05 WINRIP : Simpang Rampa – Poriaha : Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah : Sumatera Utara : Satuan Kerja Pelaksanaan Jalan Wilayah II Provinsi Sumatera Utara

PRA-QUQLIFIKASI 2.1. Pengumuman Pra-Qualifikasi untuk paket 05 pada tanggal 16 Desember 2013. Data peserta Pra-Qualifikasi untuk paket ini: 1. PT Multi Structure 2. PT Lince Romauli Raya 3. PT Conbloc Infratecno 4. PT Brantas Abipraya 5. PT Nindya Karya (persero) 6. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama Tbk. 7. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa 8. PT PP (persero) Tbk. 9. PT Waskita Karya (persero) 10. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk. 11. PT Widya Sapta Colas. 12. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO) 13. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor 14. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk. 2.2. Pengumuman No Objection Letter (NOL) Pra-Qualifikasi dari Bank Dunia pada tanggal 15 Juli 2014. Peserta yang dinyatakan lulus Pra-Qualifikasi adalah: 1. PT Multi Structure 2. PT Brantas Abipraya 3. PT Nindya Karya (persero) 4. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa 5. PT PP (persero) Tbk. 6. PT Waskita Karya (persero) 7. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk. 8. PT Widya Sapta Colas. 9. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO) 10. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor 11. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.


3


3.

a.

Peserta PQ yang dinyatakan tidak lulus PQ dan alasannya: 1. PT Lince Romauli Raya, alasannya tidak memiliki pengalaman umum dalam mengerjalan pekerjaan sejenis 2. PT Conbloc Infratecno alasannya alasannya tidak cukup untuk memenuhi kriteria pada aktivitas-aktivitas vital yang terdapat pada pekerjaan yang akan dilakukan. 3. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama Tbk alasannya tidak cukup untuk memenuhi kriteria pada aktivitas-aktivitas vital yang terdapat pada pekerjaan yang akan dilakukan

b.

Masa sanggah PQ selama 5 hari kalender, mulai dari tgl. 22 Juli s.d tgl. 26 Juli 2014

c.

Bila ada peserta yang mengajukan sanggahan dijelaskan apa sanggahanya dan bagaimana penyelesaiannya. (tidak ada sanggahan)

PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN Apakah diumumkan di Koran? Ya √ Tidak Bila ‘Ya’ sebutkan nama Koran tersebut: ……………….., tgl. dimuat: ……………………….. Apakah pengumuman di Koran tersebut lengkap dan jelas? Ya kurang lengkap. Bila “Tidak’ sebutkan alasannya …………………………………………………………….……. Apakah diumumkan di Website? √ Ya Tidak Bila ‘Ya’ sebutkan website institusi: Kementrian PU, https://eproc.pu.go.id/public/eproc2014/semieproc/info_lelangdetail.asp? Tanggal dimuat: …………………….. Apakah pengumuman di website tersebut lengkap dan jelas? √ Ya

kurang lengkap

Apakah informasi pelelangan diumumkan pada papan pengumuman? Ya √ Tidak Bila Ya, tuliskan lokasinya ………………………………………………………………………… Apakah ada pihak (calon peserta) yang mengalami kesulitan mendapatkan dokumen pelelangan? Ya √ Tidak Jika Ya, harap menjelaskan kesulitan yang dihadapi dalam mendapatkan dokumen pelelangan, (harap menulis kasus yang terjadi/menimpa pada pihak tersebut). ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Apakah ada pemungutan biaya diluar ketentuan yang telah ditetapkan di dalam dokumen lelang, bila ada mohon dijelaskan disini Tidak ada (ditanyakan pada perwakilan Nindya Karya) Apakah ada proses registrasi untuk bisa mengikuti pelelangan ini? Bila ada, harap dijelaskan disini Tidak Catatan: 1. Lampirkan fotocopy iklan pelelangan melalui Koran atau Website 2. Laporan Tahap pertama paling lambat 1 (satu) minggu setelah Rapat Penjelasan Awal (Aanwijzing), Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

4


BAGIAN III PENGAMATAN PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL DAN KUNJUNGAN LAPANGAN / PRE-BID MEETING AND SITE VISIT 1.

PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL / PRE-BID MEETING (Aanwijzing) Rapat Penpenjelasan Awal /Pre-Bid Meeting (aanwizjing dilaksanakan pada hari Kamis tgl. 21 Agustus 2014 dibuka pada jam 10 s.d jam 12.00 bertempat di Kantor Balai Besar Jalan Jl. Kota Medan Pembukaan rapat oleh Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah I. Rapat dihadiri unsur-unsur instansi terkait yaitu: 1. Dit. Bina Pelaksanaan Wilayah : Agusta Sinulingga ( Kasubdis Sistem Pengendalian Wilayah I) 2. Satker PJN Wilayah Siduhuaro Dachi (Satker PPK 12 Sibolga) 3. CTC WINRIP Sanjev (posisinya) Edi 4. WPM Medis Surbakti Rekanan atau calon peserta lelang yang hadir pada rapat Aanwijzing tersebut: (tulis nama perusahaan dan alamat domisilinya) 1. PT Multi Structure 2. PT Brantas Abipraya 3. PT Nindya Karya (persero) 4. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa 5. PT PP (persero) Tbk. 6. PT Waskita Karya (persero) 7. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk. 8. PT Widya Sapta Colas. 9. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO) 10. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor 11. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

Tuliskan ringkasan penjelasan/arahan yang disampaikan oleh: 1. Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional (BBPJN)/Unit Layanan Pengadaan (ULP). Menjelaskan bahwa paket ini dibiayayai sebagian oleh WB. Jika menawar kurang dari 80% akan dilakukan perhitungan yang lebih ketat terhadap dokumen 2.

Ketua Pokja Pengadaan tentang:  Ringkasan data paket-paket yang akan ditenderkan  Nomor dan nama paket


5


         



 Panjang efektif 9.7 km, titik awal berada 9 mk dari simpang poriaha dan titik akhir proyek di Rampah (Simpang jalan Sibolga-Barus).  Jenis pekerjaan meliputi peningkatan dan pelebaran badan jalan, drainase, pekerjaan jembatan .  Kondisi existing berupa jalan tanah selebar6meter dan rencana peningkatannya.menjadi jalan nasional dengan lebar 6 meter ditambah bahu 1,5 meter,dengan penambahan 5 jembatan.  Nilai Owner Estimate (HPS) sebesar 145.815.316.000. Durasi pelaksanaan 540 hari kalender Tata cara dan persyaratan mengikuti pelelangan. Jaminan Penawaran sebesar 3.600.000.000,Pemasukan Penawaran pada Tanggal 22 September 2014 (30 hari kalender) Hal-hal yang menggugurkan penawaran Format guarantee bank yang tidak boleh diubah kalimatnya Batas waktu pertanyaan terhadap dokumen adalah 2 minggu sebelum pemasukan Audit keuangan terakhir tahun 2013 harus diikutsertakan (CTC WINRIP) Hitungan financial resources untuk memenuhi kreteria (CTC WINRIP) Pemasukan penawaran sistem 2 amplop Surat sukungan bank harus dapat di realisasikan sebelum penandatanganan kontrak Rincian Mobilisasi dianggap tidak ada

Tuliskan ringkasan tanya jawab pada rapat penjelasan/aanwizjing: PT Adhi Karya berkenaan dengan lama waktu jaminan pelaksanaan serta apakah material on site akan dibayar: Jawab : Jaminan Pelaksanaan sampai pada PHO: materialon site yang dibayar terdapat pada 14.5 (c) .i

PT PP Untuk material on site berapa besaran yang akan dibayar Jawab : 100% harga satuan material PT PP Untuk gaian apakah disposal area disediakan ? Jawab : (PPK) Ada, sejauh 3 km PT PP Lokasi proyek apa sudah bebas ? Jawab: sudah dibebaskan, tadinya jalan kabupaten Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID

6


3. Rapt ditutup pada jam 12.15 dengan makan siang bersama

Catatan Khusus/Tambahan: Berdasarkan hasil pengamatan Saudara, apakah ada catatan khusus/tambahan? Tuliskan (jika ada):

Tidak ada


7


BAGIAN IV PENUTUP 1.

KESIMPULAN Acara yang dihadiri oleh WPM pada Aanwijzing, memberikan kesan bahwa acara tersebut berjalan dengan baik dan lancer.Tidakterdapat protes dari peserta acara tersebut, serta tidak ada pertanyaan yang tidak bisa dijawab baikoleh POKJA, Satker,PMU WINRIP ataupun CTC WINRIP. .

2.

CATATAN DAN SARAN Minutes of meeting sebaiknya langsung diselesaikan pada hari itu juga.


8


DAFTAR LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1.

Surat Persetujuan atau No Objection Letter (NOL) PQ dari Bank Dunia.

Lampiran 2.

Surat Pengumuman Hasil PQ dan Berita Acara Sanggah (Bila ada)

Lampiran 3.

Pengumuman Undangan Lelang

Lampiran 4.

Surat Undangan Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 5.

Berita Acara Aanwijzing / Minutes of Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 6.

Absensi kehadiran pada kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Absensi kehadiran pada kegitan Kunjungan Lapangan / Site Visit.

Lampiran 7.

Foto dokumentasi kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan kegiatan Site Visit


9


DAFTAR LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1.

Surat Persetujuan atau No Objection Letter (NOL) PQ dari Bank Dunia

Lampiran 2.

Surat Pengumuman Hasil PQ dan Berita Acara Sanggah (Bila Ada)

Lampiran 3.

Pengumuman Undangan Lelang

Lampiran 4.

Surat Undangan Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 5.

Berita Acara Aanwijzing / Minutes of Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 6.

Absensi Kehadiran Pada Kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Absensi Kehadiran Pada Kegiatan Kunjungan Lapangan/Site Visit

Lampiran 7.

Foto Dokumentasi Kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Site Visit

ii

LAMPIRAN I SURAT PERSETUJUAN ATAU NO OBJECTION LETTER (NOL) PQ DARI BANK DUNIA

The World Bank

WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAKARTA

INTERNATIONALBANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONALDEVELOPMENTASSOCIATION

J8EB Tower 2, J/. .Jend.SudirmanKav.52-53, Jakarta 12190 Telephone (62-21) 52993000• Facsimile (62-21)52993111

Ref.WINRlP /143

November 18,2013

Mr. Harris H. Batubarra Director of Planning Directorate General of Highways Ministry of Public Works .11. Pattimura No. 20/5 Jakarta 12110, Indonesia Dear Mr. Batubara: Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement project (WINRIP) (Ln. 8043-1I)) Submission of Propose feB Pre Qualification (PQ) Documentfor Package No.5: Sp. RampaPoriaha, Package No. 11: Bantal-Muko-muko, Package No. 13 Sp. Rukis - 1}. Kemuning \Ve refer to your letter No.HL0202/Bp.l11l405!2013 dated October 31, 2013, which we received on November 7,2013 submitting for our review the draft Pre-qualification Document (PQD) for the following packages: 1. Package 5: Sp. Rampa - Poriaha, South Sumatera 2. Package 11, Bantal- Mukolvluko,Bengkulu 3. Package 13, Sp. Rubs - Tj Kemuning, Bengkulu In reference to Aide Memoire June 2013, it was agreed that DGH may continue to follow pre-

qualification for the next round of only four packages (package 11, 13, 15 and 17). However, since package 5 has already been prepared and in order to avoid further delay, the Bank has no objection to DGH's proposal in using pre-qualification for package 5. Please be advised that the remaining contract packages shall follow post-qualification and that Pak Djoko agreed to it in the meeting of November 8, 2013. \ Based 011 the information provided, we have reviewed the draft PQ documents and have the following comments: Engineering Estimate and Technical Specifications 1. We noted that items of Section Day Works have not been included in the Engineering Estimate of package 11 (Bantal - Mukomuko) and package 13 (Sp.Rukis - Tj Kemuning. Please ensure that such items be included in the Engineering Estimate. 2. We noted that Section 7.16 and Section 8.7 were rmssmg from the proposed Technical Specifications, thus there are no specifications for Item 7.16(1) of package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), item 8.7(6)(a) of package 11 (Bantal Mukomuko); and also Items 8.7(5) and 8.7(6)(a) of package 13 (Sp .Rukis - Tj Kemuning). Please define these Sections and these items to be inserted in the Technical Specification.

r::~i=.o

Box 1324!Ji<:T.Jakarta 10013

m

Telex: IBRDIA600860 Headquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC,USA

-2-

Mr. Harris Batubara

November 18, 2013

3. We noted that item 7.2(1) (a), item 7.2(1)(b), item 7.2(2)(a), and item 7.2(2)(d) in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha) were conflicting with article 7.2.10.2(a) of the Technical Specifications, in which it is clearly stated that such prices and payments in the Items concrete precast (including the IGirder) shall be deemed full compensation and including erection, transportation, installment and others. Please revise and change these items; also please keep the consistency between BOQ and Technical Specification. 4.

We noted that the following items were not included in the Technical Specification: - 4 items in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), including item 3.1(2), item 7.3(3), item 7.7(1)(b), and item 7.12(3). 3 items in both BOQ package 11 (Bantal- Mukomuko) and BOQ package 13 (Sp Rubs - Tj Kemuning), including item 2.4(4)(a), item 8.4(3)(a), and item 8.4(7)(a). Please define these items and insert them in the Teclmical Specification.

5.

We noted that for the following items there is a11inconsistency between the BOQ and the Technical Specifications in term of denomination, numbering and definition: - 16 items in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), including item 1.20(1), item 3.1(1)a), item 3.1(1)(b), item 3.4(2), item. 3.4(3), item 4.2(2)(b), itein 6.3(8)(a), item 6.3(9), item 7.1(5), item 7.1(7), item 7.1(9), item 7.1(10), item 7.6(6)(d), item 7.6(lS)(b), item 7.11(1)(b), and item 7.13(1). 8 items in both BOQ package 1I (Banta1- Mukomuko) and BOQ package 13 (Sp Rukis - Tj Kemuning}, including item 3.4(1), item 3.4(3), item 6.1(1)(a), item 6.2(1)(a), item 6.3(10)(a), item 7.1(7), item 7.1(8), and item 7.1(10). Please review these items and revise the document as appropriate.

'''Ie understand that the above revisions would not have impact significantly to the current EE and for which the Bank has no objection to the minimum qualification requirements as mentioned in Section III.

•

Subject to incorporation of the above comments, the Bank has no objection to the issuance of PQD for the above three packages. Please update all dates before the document is issued to the applicants and please also provide not less than six weeks after the date the documents are available or the last date of the advertisement, whichever is later, for the applicants to submit their applications. We would like to remind you that the advertisement of invitation for prequalification of ICB package is required to be published in UNDB-online and also in a national newspaper or MPW's website. . Please provide us a copy of final PQD(s) for our documentation.

Sincerely yours, ....;.. ..' ~'.

'

Elisabeth Goller Task Team Leader WINRlP Indonesia Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region G0 r.o. Box 1324fJKT.Jakarta 10013

rn Telex: IBRDIA50086

r,) Headquarters:The World 8ank, Was'l;ngton DC, USA

,

. -3-

Mr. Harris Batubara

November 18, 2013

Cc: Director General of Highways Director of Implementation Affairs Region I Director of Technical Affairs Head of Sub Directorate of Financing and Foreign Cooperation, DGH Head of Sub Directorate of Technical Roads Head of Sub Directorate of System and Controlling Region I as Officer in Charge PMU WfNRIP eTC WINRIP

•

S5 P.O. Box i 3241JKT. Jakarta j 0013

Cl Telex:

IE>RDIA60086

Eel Headquarters: The World Bank, Washington

DC, USA

LAMPIRAN II SURAT PENGUMUMAN HASIL PQ DAN BERITA ACARA SANGGAH (BILA ADA)

EMEf~TER. DiREKTORAT

A .,lEN

f.1 ~ R··· E,; K' TO·· ~~

~

Ol'

~

~

R·. J.\

~

~

~

Nemer

tg Larnpran

Jull2014

2. lembar

Dari P\~ny~jl1p~ii2:rl P~r~~;tujlH%£l J3t~n~zfJtH1~~ (tU~:R)untuk r~a .•~et 5: R~rn.p~ 'l,flJ!NRiP iBRD LOi!i1i1 ~C~4J·IO

E\t1\a~u~tic4nPor~~fH~di fi::rw'(.r:{.in~i Sf;j!YHIftfif.~

Bersama in! karni sampalkan surat dart Bank Dunia Ref. W!NR!P/H2 tanggal 15 Juii 2014 rnangenaj persetuiuan Bank Dunia ternadap A.EF{ untuk paket o: Sp. Rampa - Poriaha (tertarnpir). r~{)hon kiranya untuk oaoat rnenysmpalkan xspada Batai terkait untuk dapat menindaklanjuf d~Enganpengun1uman hasH PO dan perslepan peielangan, Selanjutnya, monon untuk dapat kepada f\3m~ Draft Dokumen fengkap yang akan d!gunakar1 dan rencena jadv:Jaf !e~anguntuk dapat karni terusxan guns perseusuen Be3nk Dunia,

Ternbusan disampaikan kepada Ytn. : -1. Bapak Direktur Jenderal Bins Marga (sebagai I""n'~,.""w,\ ? Kasubott Pembiayaan dan Kerjasarna Li.Kif",,"~egeri (~ KasuiJdit Sistern Pengendalian WHayahilKetua Peleksana Harlan Prv1U V\f!r,lRIP 4. eTC: \!\In\n~lP 5.

LAMPIRAN III PENGUMUMAN UNDANGAN LELANG

The \oVorld Bank II'HERr'~ATIONAL 8AM< FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNf',nON!'.L DE\/ELOPMEr~T ASSOCIATION

WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAJ
July 15, 2014

RefWn-TRIP /172 Mr. Harris H. Batubarra Director of Planning Directorate General of Highways Ministry of Public Works II. Pattimura No. 20/5 Jakarta 121 10" Indonesia

Dear Mr. Batubara: Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) (Ln. 8M3-IV) Submission of Application Evaluation Report (A,ER), proposed Qualified Application jo!' Package /'0/0. 5: Simpang Rampa - Poria/us on"Nortt» Sumatera Province

Vve refer to your letter No.HL.0202lBp.lU0742/2014 dated July 7,2014, which we received on July 8, 2014 submitting the: revised Application Evaluation Report (A,ER) tor package 5: Simpang Ramps .. Poriaha at PrOVJllCe of North Sumatera including your clarification to the Bank's comments. We still found inconsistency on the cash flow amount of each applicant between summary of evaluation and individual evaluation sheet for each applicant while it is also shown that the amount of Gash flow of two applicants {PT Brantas Abipraya and PT Hutama Karya (Persero) - PT Seneca JO) are blank as indicated in the individual evaluation sheet. Please revise and ensure consistency throughout the d ocuments, Subject to incorporation of the above comments and based on the information provided, the Bank has no objection to your recommendation to pre-qualify the following applicants for the above mentioned package: 1. PT Adbi Karya (Persero), Tbk (Indonesia) 2.· PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor (Indonesia) 3. PT Brsntas Abipraya (Persero) (Indonesia) 4. PT Hutama Karya (Persero) - PT Seneca Indonesia, 10 (Indonesia) 5. PT Multi Structur~ (Indonesia) 6, PT Nindya Karya (Persero) (Indonesia) 7. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring, Tbk (Indonesia) 8, PI' Pembangunan Perusahaan (Persero (Indonesia) 9. PI' Waskita Karya (Persero, Tbk (Indones ia) 10, PT Widya Sapta Colas (Indonesia) 1I PT Yasa Patria Perkasa (Indonesia) Please inform the result of prcqualification to all applicants who submitted their applications. V/e request you to submit the draft bidding document of this package for the Bank's prior review in order to enable you to proceed with the issuance of bidding documents to the prequalified firms and to avoid further delays on procurement process,

G': POBox

132~JjKT. Jakarta iODi3 CJ Telex: iBRDIA 60086

e Headquarters:

The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

Mr Harris Batubars

Sincerely yours,

"

.~'

Elisabeth Goller

·TaskTeam Leader \\IIl~FJP Indonesia Sustainable DeveJoprnent

East Asia and Pacific

Cc: Director General Director of Implementation A~ffairs ofRegion I, DGB Director lor Financing and Foreign Cooperation, D{)P :C~GH Director for System and Controlling of Region l as e)Ie: P1\;ftJ V/IT',rp~~.p"J.)TP.~ j

Director for Reg-ion I I)~D1.A.T C~·1~C ·\l/Il~F.UP

The World Bank

WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAKARTA

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION

AND DEVELOPMENT

Ref.\\TINRIP 1168

JSEB Tower 2, JI .Jend. Sudirman Kav. 52-53, .Jakarta 12190 Telephone: (62-21) 52993000. Facsimile: (62-21) 52993111

June 17, 20,14

Mr. Harris H. Batubarra Director of Planning :O:ir~gtomt~Q~~'H~ntl of Highways Ministry of Public Works II. Pattimura No. 20/5 Jakarta 12110, Indonesia Dear Mr. Batubara: Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) (Ln. 804_3-ID) Submission oj Application Evaluation Report (AER), "ProposedQuatiftedApplication for Package No. 05: Sp. Rampa - Porlaha ( North Sumatera)

We refer to your letter No.HL.0202/Bp.ll/0404/2014 dated June 9, 2014, which we received Qll_JlJ:T_1~to, ~Ol_4 ~lJ:llt)1.it:tjl1gth_e Alml_i~atiQl1.Eva_IWl:ti~)l)K~l:>Qrt (A.J;:J~)(Qr pa.c~ag~ 5: ~il11paBgRa.rnpa. - Poriaha at Province of North Sumatera, Based on the information provided, we have the following comments: l. We found some inconsistencies all the documents such as point 3.3 of AER under "General Construction Experience", in the first and the end paragraph of this subject, it appears that it does not consistent with the narrative description of four applicants as written. Moreover, under point applicant No.3 (PT Brantas Abipraya) and applicant No.14 (PT Yasa Patria Perkasa), it still refers to PT Nandya Karya. As to applicant No.7, from the narrative it is not clear why this applicant did not meet the required experience.

2. Finally, an inconsistency is also found in section 4 Conclusions and Recommendations of AER in the last paragraph. Please revise all as appropriate to ensure consistency. 3. We note thatrequest for clarification letters were sent by PIU to only 7 (out of the total 14) applicants on the Key Activities. Please confirm that other than the missing qualification information which was requested from the 7 applicants through request for clarification letters, the remaining qualification information provided by all 14 applicants in their applications was found by PIU to be sufficient for making the determination of the applicants' qualifications against the specified qualification criteria. If not, please send a written request to seek clarification from the applicants inrelation to the produetien :rate of key activities. 4. It is indicated in the AER that one applicant (PT Lince Romali Raya) does not meet the requirement of general experience and two applicants (PT Conbloc Infratecno and PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama) do not meet the requirement of key activities. Please clarify how you calculate the production rate of each applicant by providing calculation breakdowns and supporting pages firm's applications and/or clarification responses. It is also noted that PT Jaya Konstruksi had done past contract experience in joint venture for which the portion of

on

[i'J P.O. Sox 1324/JKT, Jakarta 10013

ru Telex:

IBRDIA 60086 ® Headquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

-2-

Mr. Harris Batubara

June 13, 2014

joint venture is specified. It is unclear whether the production rate mentioned in the report is a total rate after or before calculated by specific portion. It seems that the :firm carried out the past contract experience as lead partner of 55% portion of IV. Please confirm that the total amount of 10,338.02 ton/month for asphalt and 9,011.25 m3/month is the total production rate done by PI J aya Konstruksi, ).

For the cash flow requirement, it is stated in the- footnote of Section III PUll1t J.l(b) ofilie Prequalification document that the applicant must demonstrate the availability of the required liquid assets in the form of a statement showing the amount in the applicant's bank account and/or through line of credit supported by letter from the applicant's commercial bank confirming availability of those funds for this contract if awarded to the bidder. However, in the table of AER, it appears that PlU incorrectly calculated the total amount of the applicant's available liquid assets by also including the amount equal to the difference between current assets and current liabilities based on the latest period of the applicant's audited financial statements. This is inconsistent with the requirements specified in the pre-qualification document. Please revise the AER accordingly by determining the available liquid asset of each applicant based on the documented amount in the applicant's bank account and/or line of credit, as specified in the qualification criteria of the pre-qualification document, In case after having correctly calculated the available liquid asset of each applicant, if the applicant does not meet the requirement of cash flow (in the form of liquid asset and/or credit line) and if the applicant meets all other qualification criteria, then in order to avoid restricted competition at the subsequent bidding stage and also given that the cash flow requirement in any case has to be verified 'as being met at the later stage of bidding, 'the B.an1~will be willing to. consider if PIU would like to still conditionally pre-qualify all such applicants subject to the applicant meeting the required minimum amount of liquid assets at the later time of bidding

6. Please also confirm that in addition to the advertisement in UNDB online, this procurement process was also published in local newspaper and/or in PIU's website. We look forward to receiving your responses on the above including the revised AER. If you would like to discuss regarding our comments above, please let us know. Sincerely yours,

Elisabeth Goller Task Team Leader WINRlP Indonesia Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region

Cc: Director General of Highways Director of Implementation Affairs of Region I, DOH

Deputy Director for Financing and Foreign Cooperation, DOP, DGH Deputy Director for System and Controlling of Region I as Ole PMU WIN RIP , DIA 1. Deputy Director for Region I B, DIA I CTCWINRIP ~.; P.O. Box1324!~KT.Jakarta 40013 r[j Telex: IB,RDIA 60086 r-) Headquarters:The World Sank.Washington

DC.• USA

We refer to The World Bank Letter WINRIP/168 dated June 17, 2014 submitting AER for package 5 : Simpang Rampa - Poriaha at Province of North Sumatera, committee has been answering the question below:

The World Bank Comments:

The Committee Answers:

1. Some inconsistencies on the documents such as point 3.3 of AER under "General Construction Experience", in the first and the end paragraph of this subject, it appears that it not consistent with the narrative description of four applicants as written. Moreover, under point applicant No.3 (PT Brantas Abipraya) and applicant No. 14 (PT Yasa Patria Perkasa), it still refers to PT Nindya Karya, As to applicant No.7, from the narrative it is not clear why this applicant did not meet the required experience.

1. The narration of point 3.3 points for general Experience in the first paragraph and the last one had corrected.

2. Inconsistency is also found in section 4 Conclusions and Recommendations of AER in the last paragraph. Please revise all as appropriate to ensure consistency.

2. Section 4 conclusion and recommendations also had been corrected and now consistent with other section.

3. Request for clarification letters were sent by PU to only 7 (out of the total 14) applicants on the Key Activities. Please confirm that other than the missing qualification information which was requested from the 7 applicants through request for clarification letters, the remaining qualification information provided by all 14 applicants in their applications was found by PU to be sufficient for making the determination of the applicants qualifications against the specified qualification criteria. If not, please send a written request to seek clarification from the applicants in relation to the production rate of key activities.

3. Clarification only to the 7 applicant because they submitted data especially for general experiences and key activities incompletely while the other applicants submitted sufficient and complete data in their document. While other applicant is not clarified because the data entered is meeting the requirements specified

4. It is indicated in the AER that one applicant (PT Lince Romali Raya) does not meet the requirement of general experience and two applicants (PT Conbloc Infratecno and PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama) do not meet the requirement of key activities. Please clarify how you calculate the production rate of each applicant by providing calculation breakdowns and supporting pages on firm's applications and/or clarification responses. It is also noted that PT Jaya Konstruksi had done past contract experience in joint venture for which the portion of joint venture is specified. It is unclear whether the production rate mentioned in the report is a total rate after or before calculated by specific portion. It seems that the firm carried out the past contract experience as lead partner of 55% portion of JV. Please confirm that the total amount of 10,338.02 ton/month for asphalt and 9,011.25 m3/month is the total production rate done by PT Jaya Konstruksi.

4. PT Lince Romauli Raya did not submitted completely data for general experience and this applicant had failed in MCTO requirement so we assumed the clarification was not need anymore for general experience. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama submitted the complete data. The committee evaluated the biggest experience of key specific activities that had submitted to us (calculation of production rate and supporting pages of data included in the report). Same case for PT Conbloc infratecno based on completely data received, the committee evaluated the highest production rate of the applicant related to Aggregate and Asphalt works.

5. For the cash flow requirement, it is stated in the footnote of Section III point 3.1(b) of the Pre- qualification document that the applicant must demonstrate the availability of the required liquid assets in the form of a statement showing the amount in the applicant's bank account and/or through line of credit supported by letter from the applicant's commercial bank confirming availability of those funds for this contract if awarded to the bidder. However, in the table of AER, it appears that PIU incorrectly calculated the total amount of the applicant's available liquid assets by also including the amount equal to the difference between current assets and current liabilities based on the latest period of the applicant's audited financial statements. This is inconsistent with the requirements specified in the pre-qualification document. Please revise the AER accordingly by determining the available liquid asset of each applicant based on the documented amount in the applicant's bank account and/or line of credit, as specified in the qualification criteria of the prequalification document. In case after having correctly calculated the available liquid asset of each applicant, if the applicant does not meet the requirement of cash flow (in the form of liquid asset and/or credit line) and if the applicant meets all other qualification criteria, then in order to avoid restricted competition at the subsequent bidding stage and also given that the cash flow requirement in any case has to be verified as being met at the later stage of bidding, the Bank will be willing to consider if PU would like to still conditionally pre-qualify all such applicants subject to the applicant meeting the required minimum amount of liquid assets at the later time of bidding.

5. For cash flow requirements in section III point 3.1 (b) we have to fix in accordance with the requested World Bank, where in the evaluation sheet have included data support the bank and current account of each applicant. The committee had corrected the evaluation regard to this criteria, some applicant did not submitted the data and some others based on evidences includes in document did not fulfill the requirements, as suggested by the Bank to avoid restricted competition, the committee made consideration to qualified in applicant who did not fulfill the requirement for cash flow but meet the requirement in other criteria. For all applicants the financial resources must be updated and meet the requirement for this criteria at the bidding stage.

6. Please also confirm that in addition to the advertisement in UNDB online, this procurement process was also published in local newspaper and/or in PIU's website.

6. The Committee also announced the advertisement in LPSE (Electronic Procurement Services Portal) Ministry of Public Works Website.

z

«

z

o

«

..J

UJ

..J

UJ Q.

Z

«

::J

~ ~

::J

UJ

o Z a.

f/)

:.:::

::::J 0:: l-

o:

Z

o :.::: z ~ --, 0:: w

:.::: w a, c:(

(5 w

>z w a.

C

C'C

ttl 'I::'

~ ev

C)

Q.

c C'C

"'C

,iIi

....:

'<0 C

(j)

o

ro

o· 'iii Z c

ro "iii --,

a,

.:.::: a.

N

@.

III

« CJ ...J o

c

ro ro c ro

~ ro

(jj Q.

~ c,

c.. ro

'i:'

~ s::

<11

<11

:::I

... II) .Q :::I II)

e c

<11 <11 'I::' II!

II!

.,lI:

C'C C'C

"
c

oN ro --, <X)

3?

N C/)

C")

"'"" o

.N C/)

II!

o (0

e

~

"'C

~

ev

C'C 01 C

U

l!!

a.

41

C

"'C

Q.

...

a. <11

~ a.

II)

<11

::c

ttl

E

<11

a. Z

<11

E

<11.

Z

(f)

·CO .<:: CO

::::J

c

CO "'C CO

III

c ro

"'C II!

2 "'C t-

o

o .....

M ....

00 N

C'C

..,

N C

o

....

,!.\1.,

E

o

z

.... T""

c

E o

"
o

'C

....

N

.E ro r0-

O

z:

'Cij

c

m

c:i

<:)

E

o ,!.\1., <:) <:)

en ....

....

<11

..,e 'Vi c~ .~.~ CII· • C).lI::

m"i .Q :::l E::'::

c 0 evO

:a[

Q.c

.lI::C'C

I/)

c

«"6,

....t!ltV -.4141 CO::.::

.... ,...

Today, Monday dated tenth of February in the year of Two thousand fourteen (Feb lOth, 2(14), Procurement Team of Satker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah II Sumatera Utara Province for \VINRfP IBRD Loan 8043-1D firstly declare that the application. submission of Package 05 Sp. Rampa-Poriaha (Satker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah n Provinsi Su m ate r a Utara r.Province of North Sumatera has closed at 10.nO am (local time). The Application Submission held in the meeting morn of Balai Diktat PU Wilayah I J1. Bus! Da larn No. i A Me dan , North Sumatera Province The application subm is-sian was conducted by Procurement Team were based on : " Standard Procurement Document, Prequsliflcerion Document for Prcuresaeat of Works and User's Guide, The World Bank, August 2006 revised May 2007 atld September 201 0 Guidelines: Procurement Under lBRD Loans and IDA Credits puhlished by \~lorld Bank May 2004, RevisedOctober 1,2006& May t, 2010 ". Decree of the Presidest of Repu'oJic Indonesia, number 70 year 2012, Decree of the President of Repablic Indonesia, number 54 veal"2010. LOZU1 Agreement Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project.Lcaa No. 8043-ID 6. Decree of Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksaaaan Jalan Nasional 1 No, 70lKpts-Brl20D dated on Nov

21,2013 . Based on above doc u men t s and data in pre-qnalification Procurement Tea m summarized the result as follows: L

2. 1-

.s,

Number Number Number Nmnber

ofappticants registered for pre-qualificatioa " of spplicants submitted the applicatien documents' of applicants did not submitted the application documents of applicants late to submitted the application documents

documeat submitted,

5 8 applicants. 14 apPlicants 44 applicants applicants

The name of the applicants were submitted the applications, as follows: 1 J.

PT.1Vlulti Structure, PT, Lince Romauli Raya,

"

,.).

PT. Conbloe Infratecno.

4.

PT. Brantas Abipraya. PT. Nindya Karya (Persero).

6.

PT. Jsya Kenstreksi Manggala Pratama, Tbk.

"I

PT. Vasa Patria Perkasa.

I.

PT. PP (Persero), Tbk.

9.

PT. Waskita Karya (Persero).

10. PI. Adhi Karya (Persero), Tbk. 11. PT. Widya Sapta Colas. 12.

PT. Hutama Karya - Seneca Indonesia (JO).

13.

PT. Bangun Cipta Kontraktor.

1!~.

PI. Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

As an information in relation on the 14 (fourteen) applicants who submitted the application documents, i (one) of the applicants were submitted the applications as a Joint Opeartions/Joint Venture.

LAMPIRAN IV SURAT UNDANGAN PRE-BID MEETING + SITE VISIT

PROCUREMENT

ULP

COMMITTEE

TEAM

(KELOMPOK

KERJA)

BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONAL • I

SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONALWIlAYAH II PROV1N$1SUMUT Alamat: Jn, 8os1Galant No 7 M!l1N" Tetp 1J61·7Wl804, Fax.:>61 7866604, il-."'la!l: wiorip pc2@~maiLoom

Nomer

Medan,

: 25 Ipo~JoIwl(1f1p:B!.S3l2014

t g AgdstlJS 2014

Lampiran

l\ep
ill..lllJl

Penisl

. Pre-bid Meeting Pallet 05 WINRlP Sp. Rampa • Poriaha

Cehubu'lgan akan dladakan Pre·b d Meeting Pakel 05 WINRIP Sp Rampe - Poriahll, :lfmg;;n berkensn lIehadiran Bapak pads :)re-blc ~ti!'19 Icrsebu' pada'

1111

kami tronon

Hart! T3I'l!)9al · .....am1S!21 AguslllS 2014 Waklu · 10.00 W1B • selssaJ TA!npill · Balai Booar Pel1l'<sanaa- Jalan Nasi'lnall Jalen $al\j Lubis No 1 Medan

LJernlklan ~aml sampalkan, atas pernallan d6'1 kerjasamanya kMil UC!lpkan teoma kas h.

Ketua POKJA

l> Psn-~atJaaf1Rarang/.Jasa

r

W!NRiP Paket Sp. Rsnpa • Poriaha

~J ~\j\l-~ Ir.lrwan. MT NIP. 19520213 199203 1 002

Tt':!11bl§an disamDalkan kepada Ylh; '1. KF.pal'l Ba!ai sesar Pelaksanaan Ja;an Nasmall dl Madan; 2. Kasalker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional \¥.la'tah " p(()'i SJmul di ~aJan; 3 PPJ<12 (Sibdga, Cs)

LAMPIRAN V BERITA ACARA AANWIJZING/MINUTES OF PRE BID MEETING + SITE VISIT

LAMPIRAN VI ABSENSI KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN SITE VISIT

LAMPIRAN VII DOKUMENTASI KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting, Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi WINRIP Loan IBRD No. 8043-ID

LAMPIRAN 7: DOKUMENTASI AANWIJZING

Wakil Pengamat dari Masyarakat/Community Representative Observer (WPM/CRO) Paket 05

WAKIL PENGAMAT DARI MASYARAKAT (WPM) Nama WPM : Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST.,MT Nama Paket : 05, Simpang Rampa - Poriaha Provinsi : Sumatera Utara

Recommend Documents