LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Karakter Masing-Masing Stasiun di TNUK

71

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1. Karakter Masing-Masing Stasiun di TNUK. Stasiun

Lokasi

I.

S.Cilintang

II.

S.Prepet

III.

S.Cikawung

IV.

S.Citamanjaya

Karakteristik -

Pasang surut dominan. Vegetasi mangrove tertutup. Substrat berlumpur dan berpasir. Air sungai jernih. Tidak ada sampah, banyak serasah. Tidak dilewati perahu nelayan. Daerah pasang surut. Vegetasi mangrove tertutup. Substrat berpasir dan sedikit berlumpur. Air sungai jernih. Tidak ada sampah, banyak serasah. Tidak dilewati perahu nelayan. Daerah pasang surut. Vegetasi Mangrove terbuka. Substrat berpasir dan sedikit berlumpur. Warna Air hitam kecoklatan dan keruh. Tidak ada sampah, sedikit serasah. Jarang dilintasi perahu nelayan. Daerah pasang surut. Vegetasi mangrove terbuka. Substrat berpasir dan sedikit berlumpur. Warna Air hitam kecoklatan dan keruh. Banyak sampah dan serasah. Lalu lintas perahu nelayan.

72

Lampiran 2. Lokasi Penelitian SMMA (1) dan TNUK (2).

73

Lampiran 3. Hasil Analisis Indeks Keanekaragaman Jenis (H), Indeks Kemerataan (E) dan Indeks Kekayaaan Spesies (d) di TNUK. Cilintang Prepet Keanekaragaman Jenis (H) Kemerataan Jenis (E) Kekayaan Jenis (d)

3.187 0.87 6.602

3.217 0.891 6.326

Cikawung Citamanjaya 2.824 0.857 5.063

2.957 0.853 5.474

74

Lampiran 4. Hasil PCA Karakter Truss Morfometrik P.schlosseri Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues

Compo nent

Total

% of Variance

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

12.788

60.897

60.897

12.788

60.897

60.897

2

3.690

17.573

78.471

3.690

17.573

78.471

3

2.363

11.252

89.722

2.363

11.252

89.722

4

.648

3.084

92.806

5

.432

2.057

94.863

6

.307

1.461

96.324

7

.222

1.057

97.380

8

.153

.730

98.110

9

.097

.460

98.570

10

.060

.285

98.855

11

.054

.260

99.115

12

.041

.197

99.312

13

.037

.175

99.487

14

.031

.147

99.634

15

.023

.110

99.745

16

.016

.078

99.822

17

.012

.058

99.880

18

.010

.047

99.928

19

.007

.035

99.962

20

.004

.021

99.983

21

.004

.017

100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

75

Lampiran 4. (Lanjutan)

76

Lampiran 5. Hasil PCA Karakter Truss Morfometrik A.gymnocephalus. Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues

Compo nent

Total

% of Variance


Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

14.661

69.814

69.814

14.661

69.814

69.814

2

3.762

17.914

87.728

3.762

17.914

87.728

3

1.437

6.843

94.571

1.437

6.843

94.571

4

.414

1.973

96.544

5

.170

.811

97.355

6

.145

.690

98.045

7

.095

.451

98.496

8

.082

.391

98.887

9

.059

.280

99.167

10

.048

.227

99.395

11

.029

.136

99.531

12

.025

.121

99.652

13

.019

.092

99.744

14

.014

.065

99.809

15

.011

.052

99.861

16

.010

.047

99.909

17

.009

.042

99.951

18

.004

.019

99.969

19

.003

.013

99.983

20

.002

.010

99.993

21

.002

.007

100.000


77


78

Lampiran 6. Hasil PCA Karakter Truss Morfometrik L.subviridis. Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues

Compo nent

Total

% of Variance


Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

14.792

70.440

70.440

14.792

70.440

70.440

2

1.949

9.280

79.719

1.949

9.280

79.719

3

1.241

5.908

85.627

1.241

5.908

85.627

4

1.107

5.272

90.899

5

.424

2.017

92.916

6

.354

1.684

94.600

7

.296

1.408

96.008

8

.189

.902

96.910

9

.151

.717

97.627

10

.112

.536

98.163

11

.100

.478

98.641

12

.066

.314

98.955

13

.052

.248

99.203

14

.041

.195

99.398

15

.034

.163

99.562

16

.026

.125

99.687

17

.020

.095

99.782

18

.015

.073

99.855

19

.013

.062

99.917

20

.011

.055

99.971

21

.006

.029

100.000


79


80

Lampiran 7. Gambar ketiga jenis ikan yang diujikan

a. P.schlosseri di SMMA dan TNUK

b. A.gymnocephalus di SMMA dan TNUK

c. L.subviridis di SMMA dan TNUK

81

Lampiran 8. Grafik Hubungan Panjang-Berat P.schlosseri; a dan b (jantan,betina SMMA); c dan d (jantan, betina TNUK)

a

b

c

d

82

Lampiran 9. ANOVA P.schlosseri a. P.schlosseri jantan di SMMA SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics Multiple R

0.97476983

R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error

0.950176222 0.948009971 0.027038424

Observations

25

ANOVA Df Regression

SS

Significance F

MS

F 438.627

1.77E-16

1

0.32067

0.32067

Residual

23

0.016815

0.000731

Total

24

0.337485

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Lower 95%

Intercept

-5.78943327

0.312776

-18.5098

log L

3.403141605

0.162492

20.94342

2.6E-15 1.77E16

Thit = -2,481 Ttabel = 2,3979

Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-6.43646

-5.14241

-6.43646

-5.14241

3.067001

3.739282

3.067001

3.739282

83

Lampiran 9. (Lanjutan) b. P.schlosseri betina di SMMA SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.984841017


0.969911828 0.969462751 0.046505108

Observations

69

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

4.671029

4.671029

2159.789

Residual

67

0.144903

0.002163

Total

68

4.815932

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Intercept

-6.01546522

0.148622

-40.4751

8.03E-49

log L

3.523746421

0.075823

46.47353

1.05E-52

Regression

Thit = -6,9075 Ttabel = 2,2929

Significance F 1.05E-52

Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-6.31212

-5.71882

-6.31212

-5.71882

3.372404

3.675089

3.372404

3.675089

Lower 95%

84

Lampiran 9. (Lanjutan) c. P.schlosseri jantan di TNUK SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.979068179


0.958574499 0.956601856 0.072557732

Observations

23

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

2.558261

2.558261

485.9341

Residual

21

0.110557

0.005265

Total

22

2.668818

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Intercept

-5.79747624

0.269661

-21.4991

8.8E-16

Log L

3.429851627

0.155592

22.04391

5.31E-16

Regression

Thit = -2,7627 Ttabel = 2,4138


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-6.35827

-5.23668

-6.35827

-5.23668

3.106281

3.753422

3.106281

3.753422

Lower 95%

85

Lampiran 9. (Lanjutan) d. P.schlosseri betina di TNUK SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.9884157


0.976965596 0.976575183 0.069797587

Observations

61

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

12.19088

12.19088

2502.386

Residual

59

0.28743

0.004872

Total

60

12.47831

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Intercept

-5.42877406

0.110098

-49.3087

1.18E-49

Log L

3.199706298

0.063964

50.02385

5.12E-50

Regression

Thit = -3,1221 Ttabel = 2,3000


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-5.64908

-5.20847

-5.64908

-5.20847

3.071715

3.327697

3.071715

3.327697

Lower 95%

86

Lampiran 10. Grafik Hubungan Panjang-Berat A.gymnocephalus; a dan b (jantan,betina SMMA); c dan d (jantan, betina TNUK).

a

b

c

d

87

Lampiran 11. ANOVA A. gymnocephalus a. A. gymnocephalus jantan di SMMA SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.937436


0.878787 0.87542 0.023411

Observations

38

ANOVA df

SS

MS

F

1

0.143052

0.143052

260.9979

Residual

36

0.019731

0.000548

Total

37

0.162783

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Intercept

-3.99849

0.268727

-14.8794

5.95E-17

log L

2.423335

0.150001

16.15543

4.48E-18

Regression

Thit = 3,8444 Ttabel = 2,3391


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-4.54349

-3.45349

-4.54349

-3.45349

2.119118

2.727552

2.119118

2.727552

Lower 95%

88

Lampiran 11. (Lanjutan) b. A. gymnocephalus betina di SMMA SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.940347


0.884252 0.882857 0.031782

Observations

85

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

0.640472

0.640472

634.0726

Residual

83

0.083838

0.00101

Total

84

0.724309

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

-2.86289

0.127668

-22.4244

5.65E-37

1.78517

0.070894

25.1808

1.27E-40

Regression

Intercept log L

Thit = 17,13585 Ttabel = 2,2829


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-3.11681

-2.60896

-3.11681

-2.60896

1.644164

1.926175

1.644164

1.926175

Lower 95%

89

Lampiran 11. (Lanjutan) c. A. gymnocephalus jantan di TNUK SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.9895


0.979111 0.978275 0.045522

Observations

27

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

2.428278432

2.428278432

1171.784

Residual

25

0.051807284

0.002072291

Total

26

2.480085716

Regression

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

-6.1123

0.195971567

-31.1897362

1.55E-21

3.587998

0.104816179

34.23133479

1.59E-22

Coefficients Intercept log L

Thit = -5,6098 Ttabel = 2,3846


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upp 95.0

-6.51591

-5.70869

-6.51591

-5.70

3.372125

3.803871

3.372125

3.803

Lower 95%

90

Lampiran 11. (Lanjutan) d. A. gymnocephalus betina di TNUK SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.99522759


0.990477955 0.990335835 0.04778541

Observations

69

ANOVA Df

Significance F

SS

MS

F

1

15.91403

15.91403

6969.304

Residual

67

0.152991

0.002283

Total

68

16.06702

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Intercept

-5.65298906

0.075756

-74.6209

3.22E-66

-5.8042

-5.50178

-5.8042

-5.50178

log L

3.352341076

0.040156

83.48236

1.89E-69

3.272189

3.432493

3.272189

3.432493

Regression

Thit = -8,7742 Ttabel = 2,2929

1.89E-69

Lower 95%

Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

91

Lampiran 12. Grafik Hubungan Panjang-Berat L.subviridis; a dan b (jantan,betina SMMA); c dan d (jantan, betina TNUK).

a

b

c

d

92

Lampiran 13. ANOVA Liza subviridis a.Liza subviridis jantan di SMMA SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.994315114


0.988662547 0.988242641 0.033355122

Observations

29

ANOVA df

SS

MS

F

1

2.619518

2.619518

2354.487

Residual

27

0.030039

0.001113

Total

28

2.649557

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

Intercept

-4.69407555

0.126276

-37.1731

1E-24

Log L

2.841975713

0.05857

48.52306

8.33E-28

Regression

Thit = 2,6981 Ttabel = 2,3734

P-value


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-4.95317

-4.43498

-4.95317

-4.43498

2.721801

2.962151

2.721801

2.962151

Lower 95%

93

Lampiran 13. (Lanjutan) b. Liza subviridis betina di SMMA SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R

0.993039184


0.98612682 0.985928632 0.040530805

Observations

72

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

8.173823

8.173823

4975.707

Residual

70

0.114992

0.001643

Total

71

8.288816

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Intercept

-4.55689555

0.084622

-53.8502

1.04E-58

Log L

2.777319665

0.039373

70.53869

9.06E-67

Regression

Thit = 5,6557 Ttabel = 2,2906


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-4.72567

-4.38812

-4.72567

-4.38812

2.698793

2.855847

2.698793

2.855847

Lower 95%

94

Lampiran 13. (Lanjutan) c.Liza subviridis jantan di TNUK SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.99288301


0.985816671 0.985171975 0.047056871

Observations

24

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

3.385998

3.385998

1529.117

Residual

22

0.048716

0.002214

Total

23

3.434714

Coefficients

Standard Error

Intercept

-4.30594662

Log L

2.662745221

Regression

Thit = 4,9528 Ttabel = 2,4055

t Stat

P-value

0.13723

-31.3776

9.24E-20

0.068094

39.10392

7.91E-22


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-4.59054

-4.02135

-4.59054

-4.02135

2.521527

2.803964

2.521527

2.803964

Lower 95%

95

Lampiran 13. (Lanjutan) d.Liza subviridis betina di TNUK SUMMARY OUTPUT


0.988990703


0.97810261 0.977841927 0.053103468

Observations

86

ANOVA Df

SS

MS

F

1

10.58077

10.58077

3752.074

Residual

84

0.236878

0.00282

Total

85

10.81764

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

-4.23313038

0.086615

-48.8731

1.79E-63

2.62631097

0.042876

61.25417

1.74E-71

Regression

Intercept Log L

Thit = 8,7156 Ttabel = 2,2823


Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

-4.40537

-4.06089

-4.40537

-4.06089

2.541048

2.711574

2.541048

2.711574

Lower 95%

96

Lampiran 14. Rasio Kelamin P.schlosseri, A.gymnocephalus dan L.subviridis Stasiun

Oi (B)

Oi (J)

Jumlah

TNUK

61

23

SMMA

68

25

ei

chi hitung

chiinv

keputusan

J

B

84

42

17.19048

3.841459

tolak H0

1

2.65

93

46.5

19.88172

3.841459

tolak H0

1

2.72

a. P.schlosseri Stasiun

Oi (B)

Oi (J)

Jumlah

ei

chi hitung

chiinv

keputusan

J

B

TNUK

69

27

96

48

18.38

3.84

tolak H0

1

2.56

SMMA

85

38

123

61.5

17.95935

3.841459

tolak H0

1

2.24

b. A.gymnocephalus Stasiun

Oi (B)

Oi (J)

Jumlah

ei

chi hitung

chiinv

keputusan

J

B

TNUK

86

24

110

55

34.945455

3.841459

tolak H0

1

3.58

SMMA

72

29

101

50.5

18.306931

3.841459

tolak H0

1

2.48

c. L.subviridis

97

Lampiran 15. Grafik Hubungan Panjang Standar dengan Fekunditas P.schlosseri di SMMA dan TNUK (a dan b)

a

b

98

Lampiran

16. Grafik Hubungan Panjang Standar dengan A.gymnocephalus di SMMA dan TNUK (a dan b)

a

b

Fekunditas

99

Lampiran 17. Grafik Hubungan Panjang Standar dengan Fekunditas L.subviridis di SMMA dan TNUK (a dan b)

a

b

100

Lampiran 18. Grafik Hubungan IKG dengan HSI P.schlosseri jantan SMMA (a) dan TNUK (b); betina SMMA (c) dan TNUK (d) 4

y = 0.5467x + 2.2903 R2 = 0.9489

3.5

HIS (%)

3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

IKG (%)

a 3

y = 1.1335x + 0.8613 R2 = 0.7371

2.5

HIS (%)

2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -

0.50

1.00 IKG (%)

b

c

d

1.50

2.00

101

Lampiran 19. Grafik Hubungan IKG dengan HSI A.gymnocephalus jantan SMMA (a) dan TNUK (b); betina SMMA (c) dan TNUK (d)

a

b

c

d

102

Lampiran 20. Grafik Hubungan IKG dengan HSI L.subviridis jantan SMMA (a) dan TNUK (b); betina SMMA (c) dan TNUK (d)

a

b

c

d

103

Lampiran 21. Tumpukan sampah yang masuk dari S. Angke kearah muara dan pesisir

104

105

BIODIVERSITAS, KARAKTER MORFOLOGIS DAN ASPEK REPRODUKSI JENIS IKAN KHAS PERAIRAN MANGROVE DI SUAKA MARGASATWA MUARA ANGKE, PENJARINGAN JAKARTA UTARA

Oleh Gema Wahyudewantoro (C251100091)

Komisi Pembimbing : Dr. Ir. Mohammad Mukhlis Kamal, MSc Dr. Ir. Ridwan Affandi, DEA Prof. Dr. Mulyadi, MSc

MAYOR PENGELOLAAN SUMBERDAYA PERAIRAN SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA INSTITUT PERTANIAN BOGOR 2013

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Karakter Masing-Masing Stasiun di TNUK

Recommend Documents