GUIDELINE FOR SURVEY, INVESTIGATION, AND DESIGN OF BLACK SPOT LOCATION (SID-LRK) IN LAMPUNG PROVINCE, INDONESIA. Budi Hartanto Susilo Professor on Civil Engineering Maranatha Christian University Jl. Suria Sumantri 65, Bandung 40164 Email:
[email protected] Abstract In connection with the government's obligation to take responsibility for ensuring the safety of traffic and road transport (LLAJ) for road users, it is necessary to attempt to achieve this goal, one of which is to conduct Surveys, Investigations, and Design of Black Spot Location (SID-LRK) . Therefore, there needs to be the guideline in doing SID-LRK. This is expected to assist in the reduction and prevention of traffic accidents. So in this study compiled procedure SID-LRK and as the application of the research conducted at the National roads in the Province of Lampung. Application procedure resulted SID-LRK at five locations of black spot. Keywords : road safety, survey-investigation-desain (SID) of black spot
1.
INTRODUCTION
Traffic accidents are one of the enormous problems faced by the Indonesian Government. Data in the Police Department, shows that each year more than 30,000 people died in traffic accidents and over 70,000 people suffered injuries resulting in many event for life and the cause of the poorer family. In Indonesia, the number of vehicles increasing in every year and human error becomes a major factor in the increase in traffic accidents. Data from Police Department said, in 2012, occurred 109 038 cases of accidents with victims died as many as 27 441 people, with the potential socio-economic losses of about Rp 203 trillion - Rp 217 trillion per year (2.9% 3.1% of GDP Indonesia) around 17.5 billion USD . In 2011, an accident as much as 109 776 cases, with as many as 31 185 people dead victims. In connection with the obligation of the government to be responsible for ensuring the safety of traffic and road transport (LLAJ) for road users, it is necessary to attempt to achieve this goal, one of which is to conduct Surveys, Investigations, and Design (SID) Black Spot Location (LRK). Therefore, there needs to be the guideline in conducting Surveys, Investigations, and Design (SID) Black Spot Location (LRK). This is expected to assist in the reduction and prevention of traffic accidents.
2.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Black Spot Location (LRK) is the location that has a rate with repeated accidents in a space and the same relative time frame. 3.
high
accident
TECHNICAL PROVISIONS
3.1 Identify Black Spot Location on the Frequency of Accident-prone Identification of 20 or at least 10 worst Black Spot Location (LRK) done by the highest accident frequency of accident data for 3 years in a row, or at least the first time last year in a particular area, such as provincial, county, or city. 3.2 Techniques Ranking Black Spot Location Ranking techniques crash site is done by weighting based on the economic value of an accident (Equivalent Accident Number (AEK)). Equivalent Accident Number (AEK) is a numeric scale used to grade weighting accidents, figure this is based on the economic value of an accident with damage or loss of material, with a comparison: MD : LB : LR : KM = 100 : 20 : 5 : 1 where: MD LB LR KM
(1)
is the number of died victims is the number of serious injuries is the number of light injuries is the amount of Property Damage Only
In the case of mutual agreement, can also be taken a different comparison as shown in Table 1. Tabel 1. Equivalent Accident Number (AEK) US A inf o
Ditjen Ditjen Hubda Polr Puslitban Hubda g Jalan i t t (Baru)
SP
BH S
Average value Average Rationalization Easy and Si mple at Indonesia
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8) = ((2)+(3)+(4)+( 5) +(6)+(7)) / 6
(9)
M D
900
12
12
12
10
32 5
300
111
100
LB
100
3
6
7
5
20
50
15
20
LR
10
3
3
3
1
6
5
3
5
K M
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3.3 Determination of the Black Spot Locations Selected
In determining the number of elected LRK by AEK each LRK value is above average and called UCL. The calculation is as follows: (2) The results of the determination of certainly considered the availability of funds.
the
number
of
elected
LRK
is
3.4 Alternative Treatment Proposed Alternative proposal outlining the handling of proposals in the form of improved handling of the physical work, road equipment, and repair bad traffic operations to black spot location / elected accident potential. 3.5 Detail Engineering Design (DED) Detail Engineering Design (DED) is also called Final Engineering Design (RTA) is a technical design drawings and details related to the handling of black spot location / elected accident potential. 3.6 Estimated of Cost Management Needs Estimates needs outlining the estimated costs of handling cost based on the alternative proposal needs handling of the Black Spot Potential Location. Basically the method of calculation of the cost of a volume or quantity derived from the design drawings multiplied by the unit price analysis results which consists of the prices of wages, tools, and materials, in order to get the standard price and the amount of the estimated cost. 4.
GENERAL PROCEDURES
Stages procedure Survey, Investigation, and Design (SID) Black Spot Location (LRK), ranging from the preparation, the initial survey, initial analysis, detailed survey and detailed analysis, presented in the form of a flow diagram, as shown in Figure 1.
Preparation phase
Preliminary Survey Phase
Initial Analysis Phase
Details Survey Phase
a b c d e f
Collecting a traffic accident data Identify the location of the worst accidents Setting up a basic map of the road network Survey institutional coordination with relevant agencies Synchronization / check crash data Collecting supporting data
a Observing a road and environmental conditions in LRK b Record and sketch / map the LRK c Marking and determine any LRK GPS base map of road network
LRK assign selected based on the ranking weighting AEK
a Observing a road and environmental conditions in selected LRK b Recording and sketching / LRK mapped in detail c Marking and determine the GPS every LRK on the base map of the road network / topography / geography
Details Analysis Phase
a Develop a treatment alternative proposal b Prepare Detail Engineering Design (DED) c Prepare estimated cost requirements (RAB)
Figure 1. Stages procedure SID-LRK 4.1 Preparation Some things have to be prepared in the implementation of Black Spot Location site investigations, among others: a. Collecting a traffic accident data for at least the past year. The accident data can be obtained from various sources, i.e. over the internet (see Example 1) b Perform processing accident data obtained from the internet to the identified list of 10-20 worst crash site. List of worst crash site was obtained by reference to technical provisions identifying black spot location based on the frequency of accidents (section 5.1). c Setting up a basic map of the road network available according to plan an investigation to be conducted. d Conducting a survey of institutional coordination with relevant agencies, including collecting secondary data from the relevant agencies. e. Synchronize or accident data matching processing results (points b) of the accident data obtained from the relevant authorities or the result of coordination with the relevant agencies. If there are differences in the locations of the worst, do the rating back to the list of worst crash site survey. f Collect data supporting or secondary and primary data, such as daily traffic volume average on road sections at the crash site has been identified. The results of the preparatory stages can be seen in Appendix A. 4.2 Early Stage Survey Initial survey of LRK : a. Observing a road and environmental conditions at LRK (10-20 locations) using a video camera or a photo. b. Recording and sketching / LRK charted. c. Marking and determine the GPS every LRK on the base map of the road network. The early stages of the survey results can be found in Appendix B. 4.3 Early Stage Analysis Preliminary analysis are: From 10-20 worst LRK surveyed, then rated based on the level of accidents and AEK, in order to obtain and set the locations. As for the determination of the number of elected LRK by AEK each LRK value is above average and called UCL. The results of the initial analysis stage can be seen in Appendix C. 4.4 Phase Survey Details Detailed survey of the LRK : a. Observing a road and environmental conditions in LRK (5-10 locations) using a video camera or a photo. b. Recording and sketching / LRK mapped in detail.
c.
Marking and determine the GPS every LRK on the base map of the road network / topography / geography. Stages of the detailed survey results can be found in Appendix D.
4.5 Phase Analysis Details Detailed analysis include: a. Develop a treatment alternative proposal on 5-10 LRK the selected preset. b. Prepare Detail Engineering Design (DED) on 5-10 LRK the selected preset c. Prepare estimated cost requirements (RAB) at 5-10 LRK the selected preset. d. Prepare technical specifications as part of the tender documents. The results of the detailed analysis stage can be seen in Appendix E and F. 5. TECHNICAL PROCEDURES Based on the stage of the General Procedure above, then do the steps in detail as a technical procedure that Survey, Investigation, and Design (SID) Black Spot Location (LRK). The description of the analysis carried out on the National road in the Province of Lampung is originated from the collection of secondary data from the last year. Then determined the location decision criteria based on the number of occurrences LRK > 2 events per location, then called and elected LRK LRK as many as 14 locations. Data from the police is matched with the data of Transportation and Highways Lampung, so elected 11 LRK point. AEK analysis is then used to rank the 11 point LRK and based on the calculation of the average value of the limit above, elected 5 LRK worst location. Further activities and analysis of the 5 locations are conducting a survey details, arrange alternative proposal of handling, preparing Detail Engineering Design (DED), preparing cost estimates of requirements (RAB), prepare Draft Guidelines SID / DED. Diagrammatically, a description and analysis of the survey work can be seen in Figure 2. For the record, the SIDLRK activity monitoring and evaluation after work / physical construction work carried out as advice beyond the SID / DED this.
Secondary data last year / Recently Year Traiffic Police Directorate in Lampung Province ((237 accidents in January - August 2014) (ditlantaspoldalampung.web.id) 237 accidents been choose the worst location (criteria:> 2 events per location)
Selected 14 surveyed locations to plan Matching the data from Dishub Lampung
Secondary data from Ditlantas Polda
Recapitulation Number of Accidents 2 Years Including Number & Type Victims, & Loss Materials (Direct)
(44 LRK: 13 version Bina Marga & 31 version Polda Lampung)
Selected 11 points surveyed LRK Justification of the number and types of economically weighted victims and the level of accidents Voted 5 worst LRK based Equivalent Accident Number (AEK)
Survey Plan Details fifth LRK
• • • • •
analysis:
Develop alternative proposal on 5 LRK handling Develop Detail Engineering Design (DED) on 5 LRK Develop estimated cost requirements (RAB) at 5 LRK Develop Draft Guidelines SID / DED Monitoring and evaluation after work / physical construction work carried out as advice beyond the SID / DED this.
Figure 2. Flowchart of Application Procedure SID-LRK
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 CONCLUSIONS From the analysis of the LRK priority ranking of the 11 LRK and than elected 5 LRK. The five of LRK elected by ratings and weighing of Equivalent Accidents Number (AEK) (the ratio between the victim died (MD): serious injuries (LB): light Property Damage injuries (LR): Only (KM) = 100: 20: 5: 1), namely: (1) Jalinteng Km 38 (AEK = 248); (2) Jalinteng Km 21 ( AEK = 202); (3) Jalinteng Km 19 (AEK = 147); (4) Jalinteng Km 72 (AEK = 142); (5) Jalinte ng Km 14 (AEK = 128). The five LRK has been analyzed for handling alternative proposals, Detail Engineering Design (DED), and the estimated cost requirements. 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS Results SID-LRK in Lampung Province is expected to be realized in order to reduce the number of accidents in the province of Lampung. In addition to SID-LRK Guidelines can be immediately distributed / disseminated to other provisions in Indonesia, so that National can move together to reduce the number and severity of accidents in accordance with the expectations of Presidential Instruction No. 4 of 2013, on the Decade of Action for Safety, within the period 2011-2020. For the achievement of activities that include LRK in Indonesia needs to be budgeted in the form of an annual program continuously (multi-year program) so that the estimated within 6 years, in 2020 seen a clear track record in the hope LRK accident reduction target of 50% in accordance with Presidential Instruction No. 4 of 2013. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge and thanks to Director of Directorate of Safety Transportation, for funding of the research. Also, the authors acknowledge and thanks to Mr. Teguh, Bandung, for his assistances. The authors also appreciate all parties who have provided data and providing any assistance in completing this study.
REFERENCES Land
Transport Safety Directorate (2014), Draft Guidelines for Survey Investigation and Accident Prone Area Design (SID-LRK), The Directorate General of Land Transportation, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta.
Land Transport Safety Directorate (2014), Final Report: Investigation and Preparation of Detailed Engineering Design (DED) Accident Prone Areas (DRK) in National Road Lampung Province, The Directorate General of Land Transportation, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta. http: // Ditlantas lampung.web.id regional police, accessed on August 31, 2014. Institute for Road Safety Research SWOV (1982), Detection and Analysis of Black Spots With Even Small Accident Figures, Leidschendam, Netherlands. The Director General of Land No. SK.7234 / AJ.401 / DRJD / 2013 On the Road Equipment Technical Guidelines, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta. Guidelines for National Standardization (PSN) No. 08 of 2007, writing the Indonesian National Standard (SNI), the National Standardization Agency (BSN), Jakarta. Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 13 Year 2014 About the Traffic Signs, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta. Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 34 Year 2014 About Marka Street, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta. Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 60 Year 2010 on the Organization and Administration of the Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta. Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 75 Year 2013 About the Standard Cost 2014 in the Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta. Government Regulation No. 32 Year 2011 on Management and Engineering, Impact Analysis, Needs Traffic Management, Government of Indonesia, Jakarta. Government Regulation No. 43 Year 1993 on the Infrastructure and Road Traffic, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta. Centre for Research and Development of Transport Infrastructure, (2004), Handling Traffic Accident Prone Location, Pd T-09-2004-B, Ministry of Settlement and Regional Parasarana, Jakarta. Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), 1994, Accident Blackspot Investigation, Crowthorne Berkshire, United Kingdom. Wedasana, USA, 2011, Accident Prone Area Analysis and Preparation of Database Based Geographic Information System (Case Study of Denpasar), Master Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School, University of Udayana, Denpasar.
APPENDICES A.1 List of worst LRK based on the number of accidents Table A.1. List the location of the accident on National Road in Lampung during the month of January to August 2014 No
Location
1 2 3 4 5
Jalinsum Km 14 – 15 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalinsum Km 16 – 17 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalinsum Km 19 – 20 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalinsum Km 20 – 21 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalinsum Km 21 – 22 Kab. Lampung Selatan
No. of acc 3 6 2 3 2
Vivtims MD LB LR 2 1 1 3 6 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 -
No
Location
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Jalinsum Km 24 – 25 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalinsum Km 36 – 37 Kab. Pesawaran Jalinsum Km 38 – 39 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalinsum Km 81 – 82 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalintim Km 18 – 19 Kab. Lampung Selatan Jalinsum Kab. Lampung Tengah Jalinsum Km 66 Kab. Lampung Tengah Jalintim Kab. Lampung Timur Jalinbar Kab. Pesisir Barat
No. of acc 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 4 3
Vivtims MD LB LR 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 5 3 4 3 1 2 1 5 3 3 1
A.2 basic map of the road network
INDONESIA
Source: Keputusan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 631 Tahun 2009.
Figure A.2. National Road Network Map in Lampung Province A.3 Institutional Survey Results A3.1 Department of Transportation Lampung Province Based on information obtained from the Department of Transportation Lampung Province, in connection with the task of Chief Warrant Lampung Province Transportation Agency No.801/SPRINT.257/III.06/2014 dated August 25, 2014 on the Implementation Survey Accident Prone Locations in Lampung Province, delivered things as follows:
1.
Based on data published by the Highways Agency of Lampung Province there were 13 Black Spot Location (LRK) and based on data published by the Regional Police (Polda) Lampung there are as many as 31 LRK. Thirteen LRK published by the Highways Agency of Lampung Province, among others: 1). Tanjakan Tarahan Ruas 019 KM 21+500, Lampung Selatan; 2). Tikungan dan tanjakan Desa Hatta Ruas 020 KM 81+100 s/d 82+600, Lampung Selatan; 3). dst. Thirty-one LRK published by Lampung Police, among others: 1) Jl. Yos Sudarso (dekat CV. Vista Grain), Bandar Lampung; 2) Jl. Yos Sudarso (dekat CV. Bumi Waras, Way Lunik), Bandar Lampung; 3) dst.
2.
Have 44 Black spot location (LRK), the team has carried survey in 11 locations, namely: 1) Tikungan Batu Kramat Ruas 0,2 KM 69+700 s/d 70+200, Tanggamus; 2) Jalinbar Pekon Terbaya KM 95-96, Tanggamus; 3) dst. d Secara rinci, hasil survey 11 LRK tersebut ditunjukkan pada Tabel A3.1.
out
3.
The team that conducted the Black spot location survey (LRK) consists of: Dinas Perhubungan Lampung Province; 1) Ditlantas POLDA Lampung; 2) Dinas Bina Marga Provinsi Lampung; 3) SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung; 4) PT. Jasa Raharja Lampung.
4
The results of the survey and study of the factors that cause or result in traffic will be made next report. Table A3.1. Survey Results 11 Location LRK from Dishub Lampung, Ditlantas POLDA Lampung, Dinas Bina Marga Lampung, SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung, dan PT. Jasa Raharja Lampung
No. Location 1 Tikungan Batu Kramat Ruas 0,2 KM 69+700 s/d 70+200, Tanggamus
Survey Results
1) sharp cornering road conditions; 2) The condition of the security fence has been damaged by a recent landslide accumulation with gabion;
3) markers and signs less; 4) there is no street lighting facilities; 5) The width of the road +7
a
Survey Results
No. Location 2 Jalinbar Pekon Terbaya KM 95-96, Tanggamus
1) The condition of good road markings; 2) The condition of good signs; 3) sharp cornering road conditions; 4) There is a bridge;
A3.2
5) road bends sharp with reduced visibility due to treecovered thereby disrupting the driver's visibility.
SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung
Based on information from SNVT P2JN Region 2 Lampung, obtained Recap Daily Traffic Data Average (LHR) in Lampung Province in 2013, as shown by Table A3.2. Table A3.2 - Data Traffic Daily Recap Average (LHR) in Lampung Province in 2013 No. No. Seg
Name of Segment
Segment length (km) 20,98
LHR (vehicle) 4.936 6.783
1
001
Pematang Panggang – Sp. Pematang
2
002
Sp. Pematang – Sp. Bujung Tenuk
60,99
3
003
Sp. Bujung Tenuk – Bts. Kab. Lamteng/Kab. Tl.Bawang
18,96
4
004
Bts. Kab. Lamteng/Kab. Tl. Bawang – Bts. Kab. Lamteng/Kab. Lamtim
45,43
5
005
Bts. Kab. Lamteng/Kab. Lamtim – Way Jepara
51,81
6
006
Way Jepara - Way Skp. Bunut (Bts.Kab.Lamsel/Kab.Lamtim)
55,85
7
007
Way Skp. Bunut (Bts.Kab.Lamsel/Kab.Lamtim) Sp. Bakauheni
33,15
8
009
Sp. Empat - Bukit Kemuning
41,67
4.156
9
010
Bukit Kemuning - Bts. Kota Kotabumi
40,31
4.952
10
012
Bts. Kota Kotabumi - Terbanggi Besar
38,75
6.024
11
013
Terbanggi Besar - Gunung Sugih
11,74
7.320
12
014
Gunung Sugih - Tegineneng
25,13
9.057
13
019
Sukamaju - Sp. Kalianda
39,35
9.466
14
020
Sp. Kalianda - Bakauheni
27,38
8.247
15
032
Kota Agung - Rantau Tijang
24,38
4.104
16
033
Rantau Tijang – Gedongtataan
30,42
5.946
3.495 4.224 4.286 3.567 3.968
No. No. Seg
Name of Segment
Segment length (km) 1,69
LHR (vehicle) 6.573
17
035
Sp. Bujung Tenuk - Bujung Tenuk
18
036
Bujung Tenuk - Terbanggi Besar
48,08
6.422
19
037
Bukit Kemuning - Padang Tambak
48,34
2.560
source: SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung, 2014.
B.1 Results of a survey on the environmental condition of the road and LRK No. Location 1 Jalinteng KM 72, Simpang Tiga Kotabumi – Menggala
2 Jalinteng KM 14, near PT. Nestle & Pelabuhan Panjang
Table B1 - LRK Survey Results Observation Result The condition of the road is good; 2) Marka road less clear; 3) Land use is plantation; 4) Number of accident = 2; MD = 1; LB = 2; LR = 1) The condition of the road is good; 2) The condition of good markers; 3) Land use is the area of industrial and port; 4) Number of accident = 3; MD = 2; LB = 1; LR = 1
3 Etc.
Description: The number of lacquer (traffic accidents), MD (died), LB (severe injury), LR (minor injuries), based on data POLDA Lampung (ditlantaspoldalampung.web.id), during the month of January to July 2014.
Figure B.1. Location 11 LRK Survey on map
C.1 Grading and determination of selected LRK No.
No.
Location
S ection (1)
(2)
1
13
2
13
3
9
4
19
5
19
6
9
7
19
8
19
9
19
10
7
11
2
(3)
Jalinteng KM 66 Jalinteng KM 72 Jalinteng KM 192 Jalinteng KM 19 Jalinteng KM 14 Jalinteng KM 88 Jalinteng KM 21 Jalinteng KM 23 Jalinteng KM 38 Jalintim KM 90 Jalintim KM 128
Amount Amout (Vehicle) Location MD LB LR LHR
Culation Weighting
Amount
Ranking
Value
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9) = (6)*100 + (7)*20 + (8)*5 + (5)*1
(9)
(10)
7.320
2
0
2
0
0 + 40 + 0 + 2
42
9
7.320
2
1
2
0
100 + 40 + 0 + 2
142
5
4.156
1
1
0
0
100 + 0 + 0 + 1
101
6
9.466
2
1
2
1
100 + 40 + 5 + 2
147
4
9.466
3
2
1
1
100 + 20 + 5 + 3
228
2
4.156
1
0
1
0
0 + 20 + 0 + 1
21
11
9.466
2
2
0
0
200 + 0 + 0 + 2
202
3
9.466
2
0
2
1
0 + 40 + 5 + 2
47
8
9.466
3
2
2
1
200 + 40 + 5 + 3
248
1
3.968
1
1
0
0
100 + 0 + 0 + 1
101
7
6.783
1
0
2
0
0 + 40 + 0 + 1
41
10
amount
Table C.1. Ranking LRK by AEK Description: Weight value: MD: LB: LR: KM = 100: 20: 5: 1
1320
In determining the number of elected LRK done by AEK each LRK value is above average and called UCL. The calculation is as follows: 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈 =
*Look at Tabel C1 kolom (1) dan (9).
∑ 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 1320 ∗ = = 120 𝑛𝑛𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 11 ∗
So LRK who have chosen is AEK value > 120, namely: (1) Jalinteng KM 38 (AEK = 248) (2) Jalinteng KM 14 (AEK = 228) (3) Jalinteng KM 21 (AEK = 202) (4) Jalinteng KM 19 (AEK = 147) (5) Jalinteng KM 72 (AEK = 142) D1 Results in LRK ground and geographical
selected sketches map.
based
on
conditions
U
LRK
Figure D.1. LRK di Jalinteng KM 14 (rank 2)
LRK
Figure D2. LRK di Jalinteng KM 72 (rank 5) E.1 Alternative proposal handling Table E.1. Proposed Alternative to 5 LRK Selected No. Location 1 Jalinteng 1) KM 14 2)
Existing Condition Geometri jalan berupa tikungan; Bahu jalan berupa sirtu
Type of Accident >< Kendaraan yang memaksa mendahului saat di tikungan sehingga
Alternative proposal handling 1) Pemasangan rambu: peringatan tikungan ke kiri (Tabel II (1a)*) dan pengarah tikungan ke kiri (Tabel II (11d)*) (untuk arah menuju Bandar Lampung), peringatan tikungan ke kanan
on
the
Existing Condition
No. Location
Type of Accident tabrakan dengan kendaraan dari arah berlawanan
2) 2
Jalinteng 1) Marka jalan kurang KM 72 jelas 2) Simpang tiga yang memiliki volume lalu lintas yang cukup besar di ketiga lengan simpang tersebut. 3) Pepohonan yang mulai masuk ruang jalan. 4) Rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kanan yang terhalang rambu Petunjuk Jurusan, dan juga belum terpasanganya rambu Petunjuk Jurusan dari lengan lainnya pada persimpangan tersebut.
>> Truk mengalami rem blong dan menabrak truk lainnya dari belakang
1)
2) 3) 4)
Alternative proposal handling (Tabel II (1b)*) dan pengarah tikungan ke kanan (Tabel II (11e)*) (untuk arah menuju Bakauheni); Pemasangan paku jalan**. Bahu jalan diperkeras dengan perkerasan beton semen. Pengecatan marka garis tengah dan garis tepi jalan di ketiga lengan simpang**. Pemasangan lampu penerangan jalan umum (LPJU)***. Pemangkasan pepohonan. Perbaikan pemasangan penempatan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kanan ((Tabel II (4b9)*), rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kiri (Tabel II (4b8)*), rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Tipe T (Tabel II (4b18)*) dan rambu Petunjuk Jurusan (Tabel V (1b)*.
Keterangan: >< Headon collision >> front-rear collision *
Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 Tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas;
**
Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 34 Tahun 2014 Tentang Marka Jalan;
*** Look at Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Darat Nomor SK.7234/AJ.401/DRJD/2013 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perlengkapan Jalan.
E.2 Detail Engineering Design (DED) E2.1 Location LRK in Lampung Province for job handling
Figure E.1. Location LRK at Lampung Province for job handling
E2.2 List quantity LRK handling work in Lampung Tabel E.2. Table E.2. List the quantity of work handling LRK in Lampung No. Lokasi Usulan 1 Jalinteng Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke kiri (ukuran 75 x 75 KM 14 cm) (Tabel II (1a)*) Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kiri (ukuran 90 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (11d)*) Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke kanan (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (1b)*) Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kanan (ukuran 90 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (11e)*) Pemasangan paku jalan (ukuran 10 x 15 x 2 cm)** Bahu jalan diperkeras sepanjang 500 m dan lebar 2 m per arah (= 4 m untuk 2 arah) dengan perkerasan berbutir dan perkerasan beton semen, meliputi: • Galian tanah untuk konstruksi perkerasan bahu jalan = 500m x 4m; • Perataan & pemadatan permukaan galian untuk konstruksi perkerasan bahu jalan = 500m x 4m; • Perkerasan Beton Semen (K-350) dengan tebal 20cm = 500m x 4m x 0,2; • Lapis Pondasi Bawah Beton Kurus (K-175) dengan tebal 10 cm = 500m x 4m x 0,1m • Mobilisasi • Manajemen dan Keselamatan Lalu Lintas selama proyek berlangsung Pemasangan marka garis tepi (ukuran 3 x 120 mm) (Thermoplastic) untuk 2 arah** 2 Jalinteng Pemasangan marka garis tengah di ketiga lengan simpang KM 72 (ukuran 3 x 120 mm) (Thermoplastic)** Pemasangan marka garis tepi jalan di ketiga lengan simpang (ukuran 3 x 120 mm) (Thermoplastic)** Pemasangan LPJU Konvensional*** Pemangkasan ranting pohon Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kanan (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) ((Tabel II (4b9)*) Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kiri (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (4b8)*) Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Tipe T (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (4b18)*) Pemasangan rambu Pendahulu Petunjuk Jurusan yang Menunjukkan Jurusan yang Dituju (ukuran 120 x 180 cm) Tabel V (1b)* Keterangan: *
Kuantitas 1
Satuan buah
5
buah
1
buah
5
buah
10
buah
2.000
m2
2.000
m2
400
m3
200
m3
1 1
LS LS
120
m2
180
m2
180
m2
3 1 1
buah LS buah
1
buah
1
buah
3
buah
Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 Tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas;
** Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 34 Tahun 2014 Tentang Marka Jalan; *** Look at Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Darat Nomor SK.7234/AJ.401/DRJD/2013 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perlengkapan Jalan.
Figure E2.3 technical design LRK handling in Lampung
Figure E.2. LRK handling technical design drawings in Lampung Province to Jalinteng KM 14.
Figure E.3. LRK handling technical design drawings in Lampung Province to Jalinteng KM 72
Figure E.4. Technical drawing traffic signs for handling LRK in Lampung Provice
Figure E.5. Technical drawing installation of traffic signs for handling LRK in Lampung Province
E.3
Estimates of the cost needs (RAB)
Table E.3. Estimates of the cost needs (RAB) for handling LRK in Prov. Lampung No 1
2
Lokasi
Usulan
Jalinteng KM 14
Vol
Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke kiri 1 (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (1a)*) Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kiri 5 (ukuran 90 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (11d)*) Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke 1 kanan (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (1b)*) Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kanan 5 (ukuran 90 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (11e)*) Pemasangan paku jalan (ukuran 10 x 15 x 2 10 cm)** Bahu jalan diperkeras sepanjang 500 m dan lebar 2 m per arah dengan perkerasan berbutir dan beton semen, meliputi: - Galian tanah = 500m x 4m; 2.000 - Perataan & pemadatan permukaan galian = 2.000 500m x 4m; - Perkerasan Beton Semen (K-350) tebal 20cm 400 = 500 x 4 x 0,2 m; - Lapis Pondasi Bawah Beton Kurus (K-175) 200 tebal 10 cm = 500 x 4 x 0,1m - Mobilisasi 1 - Manajemen dan Keselamatan Lalu Lintas 1 selama proyek Pemasangan marka garis tepi (ukuran 3 x 120 120 mm) (Thermoplastic) untuk 2 arah** Jumlah Pemasangan marka garis tengah di ketiga lengan 180 simpang (ukuran 3 x 120 mm) (Thermoplastic)** Pemasangan marka garis tepi jalan di ketiga 180 lengan simpang (ukuran 3 x 120 mm) (Thermoplastic)** Pemasangan LPJU Konvensional*** 3 Pemangkasan ranting pohon 1 Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan 1 Tiga Sisi Kanan (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (4b9)*) Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan 1 Tiga Sisi Kiri (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (4b8)*) Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan 1 Tiga Tipe T (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (4b18)*) Pemasangan rambu Pendahulu Petunjuk Jurusan 3 yang Menunjukkan Jurusan yang Dituju (ukuran 120 x 180 cm) (Tabel V (1b)* Jumlah
Jalinteng KM 72
Keterangan: * **
buah
Harga Satuan (Rp) 1.487.868
buah
1.487.868
^
7.439.340
buah
1.487.868
^
1.487.868
buah
1.487.868
^
7.439.340
buah
294.740
^
2.947.400
m2 m2
53.836 6.415
^^
107.672.000 12.830.000
m3
2.812.320
^^
1.124.928.000
m3
1.271.431
^^
254.286.200
LS LS
50.000.000 15.000.000
^^ ^^
50.000.000 15.000.000
m2
35.062
^
4.207.440
m2
35.062
^
m2
35.062
^
6.311.160
buah LS buah
16.550.166 5.000.000 1.487.868
^ ^^
49.650.498 5.000.000 1.487.868
buah
1.487.868
^
1.487.868
buah
1.487.868
^
1.487.868
buah
13.557.078
^
40.671.234
Satuan
Jumlah (Rp) ^
1.487.868
^^
1.589.725.456 6.311.160
^
112.407.656
Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 Tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas; Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 34 Tahun 2014 Tentang Marka Jalan;
*** Look at Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Darat Nomor SK.7234/AJ.401/DRJD/2013 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perlengkapan Jalan. ^
From Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 75 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Biaya Tahun 2014 Di Lingkungan Kementerian Perhubungan;
^^
From Harga Satuan Bina Marga tahun 2013 (Indonesia Infrastructure Initiative - IndII)
