DIPECHO South East Asia CONSULTATIVE MEETINGS JULY OCTOBER 2009 in. Indonesia (21 October)

DIPECHO South East Asia CONSULTATIVE MEETINGS JULY – OCTOBER 2009 in CAMBODIA (22 July) LAO PDR (27 August) THE PHILIPPINES (10 September) VIETNAM (22 September)

Indonesia (21 October) Information Session for Applicants

DIPECHO NATIONAL CONSULTATIVE MEETING JAKARTA, INDONESIA

21 October 2009 LE MERIDIEN HOTEL

Time

Agenda

08:00 – 08:30

Registration

DIPECHO Opening Remarks

08:30 – 09:00

•

• •

Opening Remarks by Mr. Charles Whiteley, First Secretary, Head of Political, Press and Information Section of the European Commission to Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam Opening Remarks by Ir. Sugeng Triutomo, DESS, Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness BNPB

BNPB & EC Delegation

Meeting's orientations by Ms. Laurence Bardon, Head of ECHO Jakarta Office

ECHO

Session 1: Strategic Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) framework, key recommendations and messages 09:00 - 10:00

A: Overview of DRR strategy and Planning in Indonesia (Government perspective) • Progress on HFA, the national platform and updates on main priorities for action and follow-up. •

DRR in the National Development Planning system, National Action Plan 2010 -2012.

B: Overview of Disaster Risk Reduction of European Commission • Review of DIPECHO interventions in Indonesia 1998-2009 and proposed main th priorities for the 7 Action Plan for 2010-2011. 10:00 – 10:20

A: BNPB / Ir. Sugeng Triutomo, DESS BAPPENAS/Dr. Ir. Suprayoga Hadi, MSP B: ECHO/ Ms Laurence BARDON

Coffee Break Session 2: Lessons Learnt

10.20 – 12.30

Overview of DIPECHO achievements and progresses by DIPECHO partners Main outputs of ongoing projects, lessons learned and key challenges, gaps and opportunities. Updates on coordination mechanisms. •

CBDRR at school: joint presentation by partners

GRC, ASB and SC

•

Linking community based DRR actions and government work: joint presentation by partners

ACF, DRC and Oxfam

Question and answer 12:30 – 13:30

Lunch Break Session 3: Thematic Discussions for the 7th DIPECHO Action Plan for South East Asia

13:30 – 15:30

15:30– 15:45 15:45 – 16:45

16: 45 – 17:30

Working Groups A. Group 1: Mainstreaming DRR into the education system

Facilitator: Titi/OCHA

B: Group 2: Community based DRR actions and local planning

Facilitator: Bevita/PMI

C. Group 3: Institutional capacity building

Facilitator: Jeong/AusAid

Coffee break Plenary presentation of Working Groups' Outputs Questions and answer Synthesis and Concluding Remarks Session 4: Information for DIPECHO applicants- Closing Remarks Information for applicants DIPECHO South East Asia's upcoming Call for Expression of Interest •

Programming process and timing, sources of information

•

Practical information for applicants : guidelines, single form

Ms Laurence BARDON

DIPECHO South East Asia

13/11/52

The importance of m The importance of mainstreaming DRR in the National he National Development Development Planning System Planning System BAPPENAS

Disaster Risk Reduction in the National Development Planning System and NAP and NAP‐ NAP‐DRR 2010 DRR 2010‐ 2010‐2012 2012

Dr. Suprayoga Hadi ([email protected]) Director for Special Area and Disadvantaged Region, BAPPENAS

¾ Government’s commitment to implement DRR in the development priority ¾ The programmes are executed through coordination and systematically by the Ministry/Institutional p p g are supported by pp y ¾ The implementation of the programmes clear budget and is agreed upon, with sources from the government, Foreign loan, Foreign grant, private sector as well as other authorized sources ¾ The outputs and outcomes are measureable with accordance to its objectives through clear monitoring and evaluation system and systematic, initiating from central to local level.

DIPECHO Workshop, Jakarta, 21 October 2009 2

The Basi The Basicc Laws Laws of DRR in the National Development the National Development Planning Planning System System ¾ DRR mainstreaming in the process of development planning, is with accordance to Law Nr 25/2004 on National Development Planning System and Law Nr. 25/2004 on National Development Planning System Law Nr. 24/2007 on Disaster Management

¾ ¾ ¾

Law No 25 of 2004 on National Development Planning System Law No 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management Law No 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning Law No 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning Law No 27 of 2007 on Management of Coastal Area and Small Islands

3

4

Law No 24/ 2005 Law No 24/ 2005 on on National Development National Development Planning System (SPPN)

Mapping the Disaster Management Policy

SPPN is the development planning system to provide development plans for long‐ term, mid‐term and annually, which implemented by government and community at central and local levels. SPPN is aimed to; a. Support the coordination amongst development stakeholders; b. Ensure the integration, synchronization, synergy amongst regions, spatial, time periods, government functions at central and local levels; c. Ensure the interrelation and consistency between planning, budgeting, E th i t l ti d it b t l i b d ti implementation and supervisions; d. Optimize te community participation; and e. Ensure the utilization of resources in efficient, effectively, fair and in sustainable manner. National development planning process: a. Planning preparation; b. Planning decision; c. Implementation; d. Controlling; and e. Evaluation 5

¾

Law No 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management

¾

Government Regulation 21/2008 on DM Implementation

¾

Government Regulation 22/2008 on DM Funding

¾

Government Regulation 21/2008 on Foreign Aide

¾

DRR National Action Plan (2006‐2009)

¾

Government Work Plan 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010

Paradigm Changes: 9 Responsive ‐Æ Prevention 9 Sectoral ‐‐Æ Multi‐sectoral 9 Government Initiative Æ Collective responsibility 9 Centralization Æ Decentralization 9 Emergency ResponseÆ Disaster Risk Reduction Disaster Management National Plan Disaster risk reduction becomes part in the development process Community protection from disaster threats is the rights of the community, and the responsibility of the government.

9

Involvement of multi stakeholder – Activities of stakeholders in DRR

9

DM Programme and DRR are implemented by the ministry/institutional and local government and is asserted in the Government Work Plan

6

1

13/11/52

National Development Planning System Coordination Framework with DM Plan and NAP/LAP on DRR

National Action Plan on DRR 2006 National Action Plan on DRR 2006 ‐‐ 2009

Long‐term Plan (20 year) (RPJP – RTRW)

y Formulated before the issuance of DM Law No 24 of 2007 y With accordance to the global agreement – Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) 2005 – 2015 y Formulated through the collaboration between the National Development Planning Agency with the National Disaster Management Agency y Elaborates the interest and responsibility of stakeholders through the participation and coordination process concurrent with HFA y Emphasizes the significance of platforms, priorities, action plans and relevant mechanism with the implementation of DM and the institutional basis framework in DM in Indonesia. y Provides guidance/references and information that facilitates decision makers in delivering their commitment with their sectors respectively and priorities on the basis of strong and systematic fundaments.

DRR Action Plan (3 year)

Annual Work Plan

RKP NASIONAL RENSTRA K/L

RTRW NASIONAL

Provincial

RPJP PROVINSI

District / City

Sector Strategic Plan (5 year)

RPJM NASIONAL

National

RPJP NASIONAL

Mid‐term Plan (5 year) (RPJM – RPB)

RPJM PROVINSI

RTRW PROVINSI

DM Plan Provincial

RPJP KAB/KOTA

RPJM KABUPATEN

RTRW KAB/KOTA

DM Plan District / City

RENJA K/L

NAP DRR

DM Plan National

RKPD PROV RENSTRA SKPD PROV

LAP DRR Prov

RENJA SKPD Provinsi

RKPD KAB/KOT RENSTRA SKPD K/K LAP DRR District / City

RENJA SKPD Kab/Kota

7

8

National Long National Long‐‐term Development Development Plan Plan (RPJPN) RPJPN) 2005‐ 2005‐2025

and Disaster Prone Area Mainstreaming in Draft of RPJMN 20102010-2014

RPJP Plan 1 (2005‐2009)

RPJP Plan 2 (2010‐2014)

RPJP Plan 3 (2015‐2019)

RPJP Plan 4 (2020‐2024)

Restructuring the State Union Republic of Indonesia (NKRI), to develop a safe and peaceful nation, just ice and democratic, and prosperity improvement prosperity improvement

Cementing the restructuring of NKRI, enhancing the quality of Human Resources, intensifying science and technology competency, strengthening economic strengthening economic competiveness

Cementing development nation‐wide with emphasizing development on economic competitive dominance based upon available Natural available Natural Resources, qualified Human Resources and science technology competency

Establishing the people of Indonesia to become independent, advance, fair and prosperous through intensification on development in all areas with a cemented areas with a cemented economic structure that would be dominantly competitive.

RPJM 2005‐2009

Draft of RPJM 2010‐2014

Sustainable development mainstreaming including climate change mitigation

Sustainable development mainstreaming based upon disaster risk reduction and climate change mitigation

Priority Focus in relation with DRR in the Preliminary Draft of RPJMN 2010‐‐2014 the Preliminary Draft of RPJMN 2010 1. Completion of post‐disaster area restoration through rehabilitation and reconstruction with integrating aspects of disaster risk reduction in the local development plan and the spatial plan. 2. Defining disaster risk reduction national action plan (DRR‐NAP) at Central and Local level. 3 Institutional and human resources capacity building in early detection 3. and disaster mitigation system 4. Enforcement of national and local spatial plan through spatial utilization control enhancement in the event of disaster risk reduction 5. Integration towards global climate change and disaster risk reduction adaptation

9

DRR NAP 2010 –– 2012 DRR NAP 2010 2012 is formulated concurrently with is formulated concurrently with the agenda formulation of RPJMN 2010 the agenda formulation of RPJMN 2010‐‐2014

10

DRR NAP 2010 –– 2012 DRR NAP 2010 2012 is formulated concurrently with is formulated concurrently with the agenda formulation of RPJMN 2010 the agenda formulation of RPJMN 2010‐‐2014

11

12

2

13/11/52

DRR Mainstreaming in the Government Annual Work Plan (RKP) Policy Presidential Regulation 19/2006 on RKP 2007

National Priority

RKP 2007 ‐2009 on NAP DRR and Proposed budget from RKP 2007 ‐ Line ministries for NAP DRR 2010‐ Line ministries for NAP DRR 2010‐2012

Focus Activity

Priority VII: Mitigation and Disaster Management

Focus 3: Focus 4: Focus 5:

Presidential Priority VIII: Regulation18/2007 DM, DRR and Disease Treatment on RKP 2008

Focus 2: Focus 3:

Focus 4:

Strengthening Institution for Prevention and DM at the national and local level Prevention and Disaster Risk Reduction DRR and Disaster Management Defining DRR NAP Institutional Development and Capacity g Building on Human Resources in disaster mitigation and early warning system National and local spatial plan based opun disaster mitigation

Year

National Priority and Focus of Activity

Budget (Million Rp)

RKP 2007

Priority VII: Mitigation & DM (Fokus 3, 4 dan 5)

221.80

RPK 2008

Priority VIII: DM, DRR and Endemic (Focus 2, 3 dan 4)

1,433.00

RKP 2009

Priority II: Economic development acceleration through agriculture development (Focus 5)

1,736.40

Draft NAP DRR 2010 – 2012 (7 main programmes) – up to 12 Oct 2009 Presidential Regulation 38/2008 on RKP 2009 Presidential Regulation 21/2009 on RKP2010

Priority II: Acceleration on Economic Growth through Economic Strength supported by Agriculture Development

Focus 5:

Priority V: Natural Resources Management and Environmental Escalation

Focus 1: Capacity building on climate change adaptation and mitigation Focus 2: Quality Building on Spatial Plan and Land Management Fokus 3: Strengthening Natural Disaster Mitigation 13 13

Capacity strengthening in Mitigation Climate Change Adaptation. (note: in RKP 2009 the DRR mainstreaming are activities under Focus)

Kegiatan

B. Program : Perencanaan penanggulangan bencana 1 Pengenalan dan pengkajian ancaman 7 Kegiatan 36,090 36,320 42,350 BNPB, BPPT, LIPI, dan DEPDAGRI bencana 2 Melakukan analisis risiko bencana 4 Kegiatan 37,310 44,200 51,490 BNPB, KLH, LIPI, dan DEPDAGRI 3 Identifikasi tindakan pengurangan risiko bencana 4 Penyusunan dokumen perencanaan dan peraturan perundangan

2011 2012

Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Pelaksana/ Koordinator Th 2011 Th 2012 Kegiatan Th 2010 KL PRIORITAS: PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA SEBAGAI PRIORITAS NASIONAL DAN DAERAH SERTA PENGUATAN KELEMBAGAAN A. Program : Penguatan Peraturan perundangan dan Kapasitas Kelembagaan 1 Melakukan koordinasi pembagian tugas, 32 Kegiatan 163,687 188,265 216,818 BMKG, BNPB, Dephut, Depsos, DKP, kewenangan, dan sumber daya LIPI, MENKOKESRA, DEPDAGRI, dan Dep Hub, No

2010

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Regulation and Institutional Strengthening Programme Disaster Management Planning Research, Education and Training Programme Mitigation and Preparedness Programme Early Warning System Programme Community Participation and Capacity Strengthening Programme for DRR 7. Preparedness Programme

10,170,154 10,281,057 11,271,928

14

No

Kegiatan

Jumlah Kegiatan KL

(1)

(2)

(3)

Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Th 2010

Th 2011 (4)

Th 2012

Pelaksana/ Koordinator (5)

PRIORITAS: PEMANFAATAN PENGETAHUAN, INOVASI DAN PENDIDIKAN UNTUK MEMBANGUN BUDAYA KESELAMATAN DAN A Program : Penelitian Pendidikan dan pelatihan A. Program : Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan pelatihan 1 pengembangan budaya sadar bencana 5 Kegiatan 60,500 72,400 83,100 BNPB, BPPT, DKP, LIPI, dan Dephub 2 pemantauan penggunaan teknologi yang 7 Kegiatan 53,725 62,855 72,285 BMKG, BNPB, KLH, LIPI, dan DepHub berpotensi menjadi sumber bencana

4 Kegiatan 44,500 51,000 57,000 BNPB, DepTan, LIPI, dan DEPDAGRI 16 Kegiatan 24,347 25,631 29,784 Bapeten, BNPB, DepHut, Depsos, Badan Geologi DESDM, DKP, MENKOKESRA, DEPDAGRI, dan Dephub, 142,247 157,151 180,624

3 penyelenggaraan pendidikan, penyuluhan, 13 Kegiatan 74,829 87,924 101,626 Bapeten, BMKG, BNPB, Depsos, dan pelatihan Deptan, Badan Geologi DESDM, KLH, DepHub, dan Pusdalop Polri 189,054 223,179 257,011

15

No Kegiatan Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Kegiatan Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 (4) (1) (2) (3) PRIORITAS: PENGURANGAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBAB RISIKO BENCANA

Pelaksana/ Koordinator

Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Jumlah Pelaksana/ Koordinator No Kegiatan Th 2011 Th 2012 Kegiatan Th 2010 KL PRIORITAS: PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA SEBAGAI PRIORITAS NASIONAL DAN DAERAH SERTA PENGUATAN KELEMBAGAAN A. Program : Penguatan Peraturan perundangan dan Kapasitas Kelembagaan 1 Melakukan koordinasi pembagian tugas, 32 Kegiatan 163,687 188,265 216,818 BMKG, BNPB, Dephut, Depsos, DKP, kewenangan, dan sumber daya LIPI, MENKOKESRA, DEPDAGRI, dan Dep Hub,

(5)

A. Program : Pencegahan dan Mitigasi Bencana 1 pengenalan dan pemantauan risiko bencana

13 Kegiatan

47,316

54,646

2 penerapan upaya fisik, nonfisik, dan pengaturan penanggulangan pe a ggu a ga be bencana ca a 3 identifikasi dan pengenalan secara pasti terhadap sumber bahaya atau ancaman bencana

11 Kegiatan

215,150

74,050

17 Kegiatan

58,627

57,042

4 melakukan kontrol terhadap penguasaan dan pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang berpotensi menimbulkan bencana 5 Pengendalian dan pelaksanaan penataan ruang 6 pengelolaan lingkungan hidup

3 Kegiatan

156,000

194,000

7 pengaturan pembangunan dan tata bangunan 8 pembangunan sarana dan prasarana

4 Kegiatan 17 Kegiatan 4 Kegiatan 25 Kegiatan

81,000

93,000

1,954,621

1,279,026

16

63,415

Bakosutanal, BMKG, BNPB, Deptan, Badan Geologi DESDM, KLH, KPDT, MenkoKesra, DEPDAGRI, dan Dephub 111,450 BNPB, KLH, KPDT, DEPDAGRI, Dephub, dan Dep. PU. 63,647

Bakosurtanal, BMKG, BNPB, Dephut, Badan Geologi DESDM, DKP, KLH, LIPI, MENKOKESRA, Pusdalops POLRI, dan Dep. PU. 223,000 BNPB dan Dep. PU.

105,000 Bakosurtanal, BNPB, DKP dan Dep. PU. 1,184,544 Bakosurtanal, BNPB, DepHut, Deptan, DKP, KPDT dan Dep. PU.

144,575

154,575

4,813,299

4,547,720

5,122,654 BMKG, BNPB, Depsos, KPDT, DEPDAGRI, Dephub, dan Dep. PU

180,075 BNPB, DKP, KLH dan Dep. PU.

7,470,588

6,454,059

7,053,784

17



18

3

13/11/52

No

Kegiatan

Jumlah Kegiatan KL

(1)

(2)

(3)



Th 2011

Th 2012

(4)


A. Program : Pencegahan dan Mitigasi Bencana


1 pengenalan dan pemantauan risiko bencana

(5)

2 penerapan upaya fisik, nonfisik, dan pengaturan penanggulangan bencana 3 identifikasi dan pengenalan secara pasti ti tterhadap h d sumber b b bahaya h atau t ancaman bencana

PRIORITAS: PEMANFAATAN PENGETAHUAN, INOVASI DAN PENDIDIKAN UNTUK MEMBANGUN BUDAYA KESELAMATAN DAN A P A. Program : Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan pelatihan P li i P didik d l ih 1 pengembangan budaya sadar bencana 5 Kegiatan 60,500 72,400 83,100 BNPB, BPPT, DKP, LIPI, dan Dephub 2 pemantauan penggunaan teknologi yang 7 Kegiatan 53,725 62,855 72,285 BMKG, BNPB, KLH, LIPI, dan DepHub berpotensi menjadi sumber bencana 3 penyelenggaraan pendidikan, penyuluhan, 13 Kegiatan 74,829 87,924 101,626 Bapeten, BMKG, BNPB, Depsos, dan pelatihan Deptan, Badan Geologi DESDM, KLH, DepHub, dan Pusdalop Polri 189,054 223,179 257,011



13 Kegiatan

47,316

54,646

11 Kegiatan

215,150

74,050

17 K i t Kegiatan

58,627

57,042

3 Kegiatan

156,000

194,000


81,000

93,000

1,954,621

1,279,026

63,415


Bakosurtanal, BMKG, BNPB, D h t B Dephut, Badan d G Geologi l i DESDM DESDM, DKP, KLH, LIPI, MENKOKESRA, Pusdalops POLRI, dan Dep. PU. 223,000 BNPB dan Dep. PU.


144,575

154,575

4,813,299

4,547,720



7,470,588

6,454,059

7,053,784

19

Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Pelaksana/ Koordinator Th 2011 Th 2012 Kegiatan Th 2010 KL PRIORITAS: PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA SEBAGAI PRIORITAS NASIONAL DAN DAERAH SERTA PENGUATAN KELEMBAGAAN A. Program : Penguatan Peraturan perundangan dan Kapasitas Kelembagaan 1 Melakukan koordinasi pembagian tugas, 32 Kegiatan 163,687 188,265 216,818 BMKG, BNPB, Dephut, Depsos, DKP, kewenangan, dan sumber daya LIPI, MENKOKESRA, DEPDAGRI, dan Dep Hub, No

20

Kegiatan

Kegiatan

Jumlah Kegiatan KL

(1)

(2)

(3)

2 pemantauan penggunaan teknologi yang berpotensi menjadi sumber bencana


13 Kegiatan

47,316

54,646

2 penerapan upaya fisik, nonfisik, dan pengaturan penanggulangan pe a ggu a ga be bencana ca a 3 identifikasi dan pengenalan secara pasti terhadap sumber bahaya atau ancaman bencana

11 Kegiatan

215,150

74,050

17 Kegiatan

58,627

57,042


3 Kegiatan

156,000

194,000



81,000

93,000

1,954,621

1,279,026

(4)

Th 2012


7 Kegiatan 53,725 62,855 72,285 BMKG, BNPB, KLH, LIPI, dan DepHub

22


A. Program : Pencegahan dan Mitigasi Bencana 1 pengenalan dan pemantauan risiko bencana

Th 2011

3 penyelenggaraan pendidikan, penyuluhan, 13 Kegiatan 74,829 87,924 101,626 Bapeten, BMKG, BNPB, Depsos, dan pelatihan Deptan, Badan Geologi DESDM, KLH, DepHub, dan Pusdalop Polri 189,054 223,179 257,011

21



PRIORITAS: PEMANFAATAN PENGETAHUAN, INOVASI DAN PENDIDIKAN UNTUK MEMBANGUN BUDAYA KESELAMATAN DAN PRIORITAS: PEMANFAATAN PENGETAHUAN INOVASI DAN PENDIDIKAN UNTUK MEMBANGUN BUDAYA KESELAMATAN DAN A. Program : Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan pelatihan 1 pengembangan budaya sadar bencana 5 Kegiatan 60,500 72,400 83,100 BNPB, BPPT, DKP, LIPI, dan Dephub


No

Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Pelaksana/ Koordinator Kegiatan Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 KL PRIORITAS: IDENTIFIKASI, PENGKAJIAN DAN PEMANTAUAN RISIKO BENCANA SERTA PENERAPAN SISTEM PERINGATAN DINI A. Program : Peringatan dini 1 pengamatan gejala bencana 20 Kegiatan 69,244 75,962 79,706 Bakosurtanal, BMKG, BNPB, BPPT, Dephut Badan Geologi DESDM Dephut, Badan Geologi DESDM, LAPAN dan LIPI 2 melakukan analisis hasil pengamatan 12 Kegiatan 27,142 33,526 38,068 Bapeten, BMKG, BNPB, BPPT, LAPAN gejala bencana dan LIPI 3 pengambilan keputusan status ancaman 3 Kegiatan 28,500 34,100 39,200 BNPB, BPPT, LIPI, DKP, RISTEK, bencana BMKG, Depdagri 4 penyebarluasan informasi tentang 19 Kegiatan 81,128 90,816 102,681 Bakosurtanal, BMKG, BNPB, Depsos, peringatan bencana Deptan, KLH, Depkominfo, LAPAN, LIPI, dan Dep. PU. 5 pelaksanaan tindakan terhadap ancaman 3 Kegiatan 60,265 72,515 84,515 BMKG, BNPB, dan LIPI bencana 266,279 306,919 344,170 No

63,415


Bakosurtanal, BMKG, BNPB, Dephut, Badan Geologi DESDM, DKP, KLH, LIPI, MENKOKESRA, Pusdalops POLRI, dan Dep. PU. 223,000 BNPB dan Dep. PU.


144,575

154,575

4,813,299

4,547,720



7,470,588

6,454,059

7,053,784

23

Kegiatan

24

4

13/11/52

No Kegiatan Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Pelaksana/ Kegiatan Koordinator Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 (4) (1) (2) (3) (5) PRIORITAS: PENGUATAN KESIAPAN MENGHADAPI BENCANA PADA SEMUA TINGKATAN MASYARAKAT B. Program : kesiapsiagaan 1 Penyusunan mekanisme kesiapan dan 10 Kegiatan 22,740 26,107 30,180 BAPETEN, BNPB, penanggulangan risiko bencana BPPT, Deptan, KLH, LIPI, Depdiknas 3 Kegiatan 30,000 36,000 42,000 BNPB, BPPT dan 2 penyusunan dan uji coba rencana penanggulangan kedaruratan bencana Pusdalops POLRI 3 pengorganisasian, pemasangan, dan 2 Kegiatan 26,000 31,200 36,400 BNPB, dan BPPT pengujian sistem peringatan dini 4 penyediaan dan penyiapan barang pasokan 2 Kegiatan 246,396 295,675 350,010 BNPB dan Depsos pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar 5 pengorganisasian, penyuluhan, 1 Kegiatan 240,000 288,000 336,000 BNPB pelatihan, dan gladi tentang mekanisme tanggap darurat 6 penyiapan lokasi evakuasi 2 Kegiatan 675,500 1,438,171 1,450,171 BNPB dan DepHub 7 penyusunan data akurat, informasi, 1 Kegiatan 200,000 240,000 280,000 BNPB dan pemutakhiran prosedur tetap tanggap darurat bencana 8 penyediaan dan penyiapan bahan, barang, 1 Kegiatan 400,000 480,000 560,000 BNPB dan peralatan untuk pemenuhan pemulihan prasarana dan sarana 1,840,636 2,835,153 3,084,761 TOTAL DANA 10,170,154 10,281,057 11,271,928

Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) No Kegiatan Pelaksana/ Koordinator Kegiatan Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 KL PRIORITAS: PENGUATAN KESIAPAN MENGHADAPI BENCANA PADA SEMUA TINGKATAN MASYARAKAT A. Program : Peningkatan Partisipasi dan kapasitas Masyarakat dalam PRB 1 Peningkatan pemahaman tentang Peningkatan pemahaman tentang 9 Kegiatan 33,070 9 Kegiatan 33 070 39,378 39 378 45,152 45 152 BNPB, BPPT, DepHut, DESDM, DKP, BNPB BPPT DepHut DESDM DKP kerentanan masyarakat KLH dan MENKOKESRA 2 perencanaan partisipatif penanggulangan 5 Kegiatan 16,404 18,507 21,608 BNPB, BPPT, Deptan, KLH, dan Dep. bencana PU. 3 peningkatan komitmen terhadap pelaku 4 Kegiatan 26,900 33,100 38,650 BNPB, Dephut, KLH, dan penanggulangan bencana MENKOKESRA 4 penguatan ketahanan sosial masyarakat

5 Kegiatan 21,289 25,346 29,351 BNPB, Deptan, KPDT, MENKOKESRA dan DIT SAMAPTA POLRI

TOTAL PROGRAM A

97,663 116,331 134,760

25

No Kegiatan Jumlah Sumber Dana Pelaksana/ Koordinator Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Kegiatan KL Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 (4) (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) PRIORITAS 1: PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA SEBAGAI PRIORITAS NASIONAL DAN DAERAH SERTA PENGUATAN A. Program : Penguatan Peraturan perundangan dan Kapasitas Kelembagaan 1 Melakukan 12 Kegiatan 3,886 3,986 ‐ UNDP, CRS, AusAid, Bappenas, BNPB, Depdagri, ECB koordinasi World Vision dan Indonesia (Care‐CRS‐Oxfam‐ pembagian tugas, Plan International World Vision‐Save the Children‐ kewenangan, dan Mercy Corps‐MPBI‐IMC), LSM sumber daya Lokal dan World Vision Partners (dan Pemerintah Daerah) 1 Melakukan 11 Kegiatan koordinasi pembagian tugas, kewenangan, dan sumber daya

10,588

166,388

6,491

PMI National Headquarter, BINA SWADAYA, PMI NHQ, Sampoerna, PSMB UPN Jogjakarta, Perkumpulan Skala

14,474 170,374 6,491

27

Sumber Dana Pelaksana/ Koordinator Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) No Kegiatan Jumlah Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 Kegiatan KL (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) PRIORITAS 2: PEMANFAATAN PENGETAHUAN, INOVASI DAN PENDIDIKAN UNTUK MEMBANGUN BUDAYA KESELAMATAN DAN KETAHANAN A. Program : Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan pelatihan 1 pengembangan budaya sadar 4 Kegiatan 1,500 1,000 ‐ UNDP BNPB, Plan International dan Departemen bencana Plan International Kesehatan UNFPA 2 pemantauan penggunaan 2 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana USAID Institut Teknologi Bandung and Asian Disaster teknologi yang berpotensi tercantum tidak tidak Preparedness Center menjadi sumber bencana tercantum tercantum 3 penyelenggaraan pendidikan, 24 Kegiatan 10,748 6,195 45 UNDP, USAID, Gate BNPB (bekerja sama dengan forum PT) penyuluhan, dan pelatihan and Melinda Depdiknas Foundation, OCHA Mercy Corps AusAid, JRS, Plan ECB Indonesia (Care‐CRS‐Oxfam‐World Vision‐ International, UNFPA Save the Children‐MPBI‐IMC) OCHA, Oxfam , LSM Lokal. World Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), JRS, Plan International. Departemen Kesehatan, NGOs, Palang Merah Indonesia, organisasi profesi, UNICEF 7 Kegiatan 1,982 1,782 210 PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, 4 pengembangan budaya sadar bencana MAIPARK, HOPE worldwide Indonesia (Yayasan Hope Indonesia), Dinas Pendidikan setempat, BINA SWADAYA, PKPU 2 Kegiatan BINA SWADAYA, PKPU 5 pemantauan penggunaan teknologi yang berpotensi menjadi sumber bencana 18,922 5,692 4,662 PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI 6 penyelenggaraan pendidikan, 36 Kegiatan penyuluhan, dan pelatihan Branch, Community, PMB-ITB, BINA SWADAYA, Sampoerna Rescue tim dan internal departemen (EHS), PSMB UPN Jogjakarta, Perkumpulan Skala, MERC (Medical emergency Rescue Committee), Skala dan Greenpress, MAIPARK, KARINA, BPBD, Climate Change Center (C3), Organisasi Kemahasiswaan, BPLHD Jawa Barat, Yayasan Jesuit refugee Service Indonesia/Adrianus Suyadi, BINA SWADAYA, PKPU 33,153

14,669

4,917

29

26

No Kegiatan Jumlah Sumber Dana Pelaksana/ Koordinator Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Kegiatan KL Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 (1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (4) PRIORITAS 1: PENGURANGAN RISIKO BENCANA SEBAGAI PRIORITAS NASIONAL DAN DAERAH SERTA PENGUATAN KELEMBAGAAN B. Program : Perencanaan penanggulangan bencana BNPB (bekerjasama dengan K/L terkait, 1 Pengenalan dan pengkajian 5 Kegiatan 1,468 170 ‐ UNDP, Gate and ancaman bencana Melinda Foundation , PT/PSB, BPBD dan NGOs), ECB Indonesia (Care‐CRS‐Oxfam‐World Vision‐Save the OCHA, dan Plan Children‐Mercy Corps‐MPBI‐IMC), OCHA International dan Plan International UN TWG DRR (Convergence Group) dana 2 Melakukan analisis risiko 1 Kegiatan dana tidak dana tidak bencana tercantum tidak tercantum tercantum 500 UNDP 3 Identifikasi tindakan Identifikasi tindakan 1 Kegiatan 1 Kegiatan BNPB kerjasama dgn PemDa BNPB kerjasama dgn PemDa pengurangan risiko bencana 10 Kegiatan 5,000 4,275 ‐ UNDP, OCHA, BNPB, Depdagri, PU, OCHA, IFRC/PMI, 4 Penyusunan dokumen AusAID,dan UNFPA Departemen Kesehatan, NGOs, Palang perencanaan dan Merah Indonesia, organisasi profesi, peraturan perundangan UNICEF/BPNB/PMI (kerjasama dengan Pemda) 4 Kegiatan 100 100 100 BINA SWADAYA, PSMB UPN Veteran 5 Pengenalan dan dan mitra lokal Veteran, PKPU pengkajian ancaman bencana Melakukan analisis risiko 8 Kegiatan 400 100 100 PMI National Headquarter, BINA 6 bencana SWADAYA, PSMB UPN Veteran dan mitra lokal Veteran, PMB-ITB, PKPU 5 Kegiatan 2,466 144 164 PMI National Headquarter, BINA 7 Identifikasi tindakan SWADAYA, PKPU pengurangan risiko bencana 10 Kegiatan 2,456 1,254 1,041 PMI National Headquarter, PMI 8 Penyusunan dokumen Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, perencanaan dan PSMB UPN Veteran, Yayasan Jesuit peraturan perundangan refugee Service Indonesia/Adrianus Suyadi, BINA SWADAYA 11,890 6,543 1,405

28

No Kegiatan Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Kegiatan KL Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 (4) (1) (2) (3) PRIORITAS 3: PENGURANGAN FAKTORFAKTOR PENYEBAB RISIKO BENCANA A. Program : Pencegahan dan Mitigasi Bencana dana 1 pengenalan dan pemantauan 2 Kegiatan dana dana risiko bencana tercantum tercantum tercantum dalam dalam dolar dalam dolar dolar 2 penerapan upaya fisik, 4 Kegiatan 1,500 1,400 ‐ nonfisik, dan pengaturan penanggulangan bencana 3 identifikasi dan pengenalan 2 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana secara pasti terhadap sumber tercantum tidak tidak bahaya atau ancaman bencana tercantum tercantum 4 melakukan kontrol terhadap 1 Kegiatan 800 450 penguasaan dan pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang berpotensi menimbulkan bencana 5 Pengendalian dan pelaksanaan Tidak ada penataan ruang kegiatan UNTWG 6 pengelolaan lingkungan hidup 1 Kegiatan Dana masih Dana Dana digabung masih masih digabung digabung 7 pengaturan pembangunan dan 1 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana tata bangunan tercantum tidak tidak tercantum tercantum 8 pembangunan sarana dan 2 Kegiatan Dana prasarana dalam Dolar Australia 1 pengenalan dan pemantauan 6 Kegiatan 674 267 380 risiko bencana

2

3

4

5 6

UNDP, AusAid dan JRS

(6)

World Vision, Plan International

BNPB, Bappenas, Depkes, Dephub WFP, AusAID, dan JRS

JRS

JRS

UNDP

BNPB bekerja sama dgn DKP

JRS

JRS

Plan International

Plan International

AusAID Plan International

Oxfam Plan International

PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, PMB-ITB, BINA SWADAYA, Sampoerna, PSMB UPN Jogjakarta, Perkumpulan, PKPU PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, BINA SWADAYA

10,686

2,582

861

860

PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, Yayasan Jesuit refugee Service Indonesia/Adrianus Suyadi, PMB-ITB

melakukan kontrol terhadap 3 Kegiatan penguasaan dan pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang berpotensi menimbulkan bencana Pengendalian dan pelaksanaan 1 Kegiatan penataan ruang pengelolaan lingkungan hidup 5 Kegiatan

100

100

100

BINA SWADAYA, PSMB UPN Veteran

-

-

-

200

200

200

pengaturan pembangunan dan tata bangunan

3 Kegiatan

8

pembangunan prasarana

2 Kegiatan

sarana dan

4,125


(5)

penerapan upaya fisik, 4 Kegiatan nonfisik, dan pengaturan penanggulangan bencana identifikasi dan pengenalan 7 Kegiatan secara pasti terhadap sumber bahaya atau ancaman bencana

7

3,442

Sumber Dana

World Vision, Plan International

860

311

556

17,402

7,031

6,221

BINA SWADAYA BINA SWADAYA, BPBD, Climate Change Center (C3), Dinas Pendidikan, Unilever, Pemkot, Media : Dlta, Republika, Rase FM, PR, Sonora DIY, KR, Jawa Pos Pusat Studi Bencana Unversitas Andalas, BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch BINA SWADAYA, PMB-ITB, BNPB, PSB Unand

30

5

13/11/52

Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Sumber Dana Pelaksana/ Koordinator Jumlah Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 Kegiatan KL (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) PRIORITAS 4: IDENTIFIKASI, PENGKAJIAN DAN PEMANTAUAN RISIKO BENCANA SERTA PENERAPAN SISTEM PERINGATAN DINI A. Program : Peringatan dini 1 pengamatan gejala bencana 1 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana USAID Badan Geologi Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi tercantum tidak tidak Bencana Geologi‐Departemen Energi dan Sumber tercantum tercantum Daya Mineral and US Geological Survey 2 melakukan analisis hasil 2 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana USAID Ambulans 118 and Asian Disaster Preparedness pengamatan gejala bencana tercantum tidak tidak Plan International Center dan Plan International tercantum tercantum 3 pengambilan keputusan status Tidak ada ancaman bencana kegiatan UNTWG 4 penyebarluasan informasi 8 Kegiatan 1,030 920 ‐ UNDP, USAID (also BMKG, BNPB, Badan Geologi, OCHA tentang peringatan bencana being implemented in Plan Internasional the Philippines, Papua Departemen Kesehatan, NGOs, Palang Merah New Guinea) Indonesia, organisasi profesi OCHA, Plan International UNFPA 5 pelaksanaan tindakan terhadap 2 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana OCHA OCHA ancaman bencana tercantum tidak tidak UNICEF UNICEF tercantum tercantum 1 pengamatan gejala bencana 1 Kegiatan BINA SWADAYA, 2 melakukan analisis hasil 4 Kegiatan 100 100 100 BINA SWADAYA, PSMB UPN Veteran, PMBpengamatan gejala bencana ITB 3 pengambilan keputusan status 1 Kegiatan BINA SWADAYA ancaman bencana 4 penyebarluasan informasi 12 Kegiatan 9,582 5,061 4,768 Pusat Studi Bencana Unversitas Andalas, BINA tentang peringatan bencana SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, PSMB UPN Veteran, Skala dan CSF, PMB-ITB (Ristek, BMKG), ACT, Sampoerna, PSMB UPN Jogjakarta, Perkumpulan Skala 5 pelaksanaan tindakan terhadap 1 Kegiatan BINA SWADAYA 31 ancaman bencana 10,712 6,081 4,868 No

Kegiatan

Sumber Dana Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) No Kegiatan Jumlah Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 Kegiatan KL (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) PRIORITAS 5: PENGUATAN KESIAPAN MENGHADAPI BENCANA PADA SEMUA TINGKATAN MASYARAKAT A. Program : Peningkatan Partisipasi dan kapasitas Masyarakat dalam PRB 1 Peningkatan pemahaman tentang 8 Kegiatan dana dalam dana dana USAID kerentanan masyarakat dolar dalam dalam AusAID dolar dolar JRS Plan International UNFPA

1 Kegiatan

3 peningkatan komitmen terhadap pelaku penanggulangan bencana 4 penguatan ketahanan sosial masyarakat 1 Peningkatan pemahaman tentang kerentanan masyarakat

7 Kegiatan

5 Kegiatan

4,361

3,680

3,771

2 perencanaan partisipatif penanggulangan bencana

6 Kegiatan

200

340

340

3 peningkatan komitmen terhadap pelaku penanggulangan bencana

7 Kegiatan

318

204

215

4 penguatan ketahanan sosial masyarakat

6 Kegiatan

54,420

54,420

54,420

64,549

60,869

58,746

1 Kegiatan

dana tidak tercantum

dana tidak tercantum tercantum dana tidak tercantum 5,250 2,225

dana tidak tercantum tercantum dana tidak tercantum ‐

2 perencanaan partisipatif penanggulangan bencana

dana tidak tercantum

AusAID


Mercy Corps World Vision partners UNDP JRS, Plan International Departemen Kesehatan, NGOs, Palang Merah Indonesia, organisasi profesi IFRC/PMI

AusAID UNOCHA JRS, Plan International JRS, dan Plan International UNDP

BNPB BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, PSMB UPN Veteran, Pusat Studi Bencana Unversitas Andalas BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, PSMB UPN Veteran, Sampoerna BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, PSMB UPN Veteran, Pusat Studi Bencana Unversitas Andalas BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, PSMB UPN Veteran, Sampoerna, Perkumpulan Skala, ACT

32

Challenges for NAP DRR 2010-2012 No Kegiatan Jumlah Indikasi Pendanaan (JUTA Rp) Sumber Dana Th 2010 Th 2011 Th 2012 Kegiatan KL (1) (2) (3) (5) (4) PRIORITAS 5: PENGUATAN KESIAPAN MENGHADAPI BENCANA PADA SEMUA TINGKATAN MASYARAKAT B. Program : kesiapsiagaan 1 Penyusunan mekanisme 7 Kegiatan 1,296 890 ‐ UNDP 2 penyusunan dan uji coba 2 Kegiatan 45 45 45 USAID 3 pengorganisasian, pemasangan, 1 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana Plan International 4 penyediaan dan penyiapan 3 Kegiatan dana dalam dana dana AusAid dan UNICEF 5 pengorganisasian, penyuluhan, 3 Kegiatan 3,000 3,000 ‐ UNDP dan UNICEF 6 penyiapan lokasi evakuasi Tidak ada 7 penyusunan data akurat, 1 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana UNICEF 8 penyediaan dan penyiapan 1 Kegiatan dana tidak dana dana AusAid 1 Penyusunan mekanisme 3 Kegiatan 2,130 2,130 2,130 kesiapan dan penanggulangan risiko bencana 2

penyusunan dan uji coba 3 Kegiatan rencana penanggulangan kedaruratan bencana

200

100


BNPB, Depdagri, Ambulans 118 and Asian Disaster Preparedness Plan International AusAid dan UNICEF Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten/Kota dan Sekolah UNICEF UNICEF BINA SWADAYA, ACT, PSMB UPN Veteran

100

BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PSMB UPN Veteran

BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter, PMI Chapter, PMI Branch, Community, PSMB UPN Veteran

3

pengorganisasian, 3 Kegiatan pemasangan, dan pengujian sistem peringatan dini

500

600

400

4

penyediaan dan penyiapan barang pasokan pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar pengorganisasian, penyuluhan, pelatihan, dan gladi tentang mekanisme tanggap darurat penyiapan lokasi evakuasi penyusunan data akurat, informasi, dan pemutakhiran prosedur tetap tanggap darurat bencana penyediaan dan penyiapan bahan, barang, dan peralatan untuk pemenuhan pemulihan prasarana dan sarana

3 Kegiatan

500

500

500

3 Kegiatan

3,596

3,200

3,200

1 Kegiatan 3 Kegiatan

100

100

100

BINA SWADAYA BINA SWADAYA, PMB-ITB, PSMB UPN Veteran

2 Kegiatan

1,564

814

900

BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter

5

6 7

8

BINA SWADAYA, PMI National Headquarter

BINA SWADAYA, ACT, PMI National Headquarter

12,931 11,379 7,375

1. RPJMN 2010-2014 as the umbrella for NAP DRR 2010-2012 has not been enacted 2. National DM Plan 2010 – 2014 as the umbrella for NAP DRR 2010 – 2012 has not been issued 3. Effort on the issuance of Nomenclature Program for DM (restructure fiscal year program) vs NAP DRR Program (refer to UU 24/2009 and HFA) in order to develop menev tools for the NAP DRR implementation 4. To raise the commitment from all stakeholders for supporting the preparation of NAP DRR as the guidance for the implementation of DRR 5. To raise the understnading the DRR is an ‘investment’ not ‘expenses’ 4. Effort on the implementation of global commitment (ref. to Global Platform in Gevena – June 2009) to allocate budget for DRR: ¾ minimum 10% from disaster recovery budget ¾ Minimum 1% form development budget ¾ 30% from budget from Climate Change Adaptation 34

33

Non‐ Non‐government Contribution on DRR Multilateral and Bilateral Loans/Grants on DRR in supporting: 1. 2. 3. 3. 4. 5.

6. 7. 8. 9.

Thank You

Institutional and Regulatory development at national and local levels; Revitalization of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Areas Conservation critical upstream watershed areas Poverty reduction programs Community Development Programs (livelihoods, settlement infrastructure program) infrastructure program) Development and strengthening on Early Warning System (including strengthening multi sector and multi stakeholder coordination and cooperation within early warning chain) Infrastructure development (incl. regulation and building standards) Strengthening BMG on Climate and Weather Services Capacity DRR Education and Training Program Raising Public Awareness

Coordination and collaboration amongst stakeholders (government and non stakeholders (government and non‐‐government) is required in formulating and implementing NAP NAP‐‐DRR in Indonesia

For further information, please visit: http: //bencana.bappenas.go.id or http://www.sc‐drr.org 35

36

6

DIPECHO Natural Disaster Preparedness Programme of ECHO Work through EU-NGOs, IOs/UN, Red Cross but with local partners DIPECHO in 2009 ¾ about € 34 mln world-wide ¾ € 10 mln for South East Asia Focus on preparedness measures incl. demonstrative small-scale mitigation, in particular through CBDRR Promotes regional & international DRR agenda & HFA Links with other EC instruments and other donors. Complements humanitarian aid actions: part of DG ECHO’s humanitarian mandate to save lives

Indonesia Disaster Risk Reduction NATIONAL CONSULTATIVE MEETING Jakarta 21 Octobe October 2009

European Commission – Update on Disaster Risk Reduction Actions

DIPECHO in Indonesia (1998-2008) DIPECHO Indonesia 1998-2008 (regional included)

EU DRR STRATEGY Adopted by the European Union in May 2009 Improved coherence between EC instruments including DIPECHO Action Plan being prepared Will work through ongoing instruments until 2013: ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾

2500

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

2000

Mid term review off priorities i i i i (2009) Country programming and regional thematic lines Increased EC cooperation with ASEAN (incl. on DRR) New global instruments eg Global Climate Change Alliance

1500 1000

Further steps will be prepared for the next financial period EU Member States committed

500 0

Funding (,000 EUR) projects

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008

ECHO/DIPECHO On-going projects 2009

DIPECHO Partners Indonesia (*regional component) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

1998 2000 2002

P CA

DISASTER PREPAREDNESS Partner

* PC * IF RC AD

C GR

SC ES

UN

OX

FA

M -U AC K FFR CA RE -N L DR C AS B

2004 2006 2008

Amount (€)

OXFAM - UK

378,558

Arbeiter Samariter Bund (ASB)

215,288

Danish Red Cross/PMI

505,622

German Red Cross/ PMI

302,182

Action contre la Faim (ACF)

265,570

Save the Children (SC)

397,395

IFRC (regional) TOTAL

61,500 2,126,115

Primary Emergency Decision West Sumatra Earthquake Partner

Ad Hoc Decision- NTT

Amount (€)

Partner

Amount (€)

OXFAM

800,000

Netherlands/France Red Cross

815,000


254,698

IOM (incl logistics)

924,000

OXFAM- UK

246,802

MERCY CORPS

280,160

FAO

548,500

UN OCHA (coordination)

167,570

CARE NEDERLAND

350,000

13,270

WFP

MAP ACTION (coordination) TOTAL

3,000,000

TOTAL

600,000 2,000,000

1

Since 2007 programming, 2006 evaluation Continued efforts to avoid gaps in programming Orientations identified for 2008-2011 still valid but more focus on scaling up and promotion Actions in Indonesia will continue but given capacities and plans, re-assess orientations in the future. 14 % funding since beginning; 21% at present +/- Similar % under next plan (?): depending on quality, complementarities of proposals

Transfer of knowledge & scaling up

DIPECHO will contribute to ongoing efforts for CBDRR institutionalisation at sub-national level: o Continued promotion of CBDRR at various levels o Continuation of CBDRR pilots/modeling at local levels but with improved cooperation mechanisms o Support S t ttransfer f off experience i ((capacity-building, it b ildi tools development, standardisation of approaches, IEC materials, campaigns etc.).

Empowering DM agencies at sub-national level. Possibility for pilots in urban areas but with priority for support to Safe School and Safe Hospital campaigns

Proposed Priority actions Natural hazards: multi-hazard approaches; all separate hazards except drought Most hazard prone and vulnerable areas: o Consolidation/completion of pilots o For pilots having gone through several phases or with completed models: dissemination tools and methodologies only o Other pilots if innovative, innovative if with an aim to scale-up, scale-up build systems and capacities, for sub-national modeling (pooling of DRR/development agencies & programmes) o No wide geographical dispersion o Remote, isolated areas and concepts

Improved integration of: o CBDRR into poverty reduction and programmes o DRR into sectors

For next AP, more coordinated approaches and continued reinforced joint actions, activities or approaches.

CBDRR in Indonesia Some pilot cycles or components at local level considered completed or in good process of being so (DIPECHO and others) Large number of projects, experience, in particular outside DIPECHO and following disasters Coordination / complementarities between DIPECHO and with others still not optimal Consortium for Disaster Education a good example Capacity building working group (CBDRM National workshop)

Continued support to implementation mechanisms at relevant levels of: o DM Law (incl. awareness and advocacy for relevant DM: BPBD or DM mandated unit at village/sub district) o National Platform (incl. civil society) o Coordination (incl. for programme implementation; incl. at sub-national level; incl. for ad hoc topics/sectors)

Continued dissemination and promotion of experience, good practice collection, research and review of indigenous knowledge (incl. on CCA) Dissemination of standardized DRR tools, messages, ToT methodologies etc. Impact assessment, Monitoring &Evaluation systems

Proposed priority actions CBDRR should be included in the annual country strategy of the partner organisation. Piloting and modeling CBDRR approaches should have clear perspective of handover Start-up/basic or singled out CBDRR projects will not be selected at this stage of DRR processes in the country (ie projects should aim at CBDRR modeling for replication). Compulsory to develop and use joint IEC materials adapted to local needs/contexts Education will remain a strong focus

Topic of today’s workshop

2

European Commission humanitarian aid (ECHO) funding in Indonesia - 2009 ECHO's disaster preparedness programme total EUR 2 million Partner

Project Title

Core Activities

Strengthening of Integrated local level disaster risk reduction in three flood prone slum areas of DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Capacity building and training for local disaster risk reduction system at Kelurahan (Satlinmas), community awareness campaign, EWS and small scale mitigation

German Red Cross

Danish Red Cross

ACF

Description

Beneficiaries

Location

15 July 2008 14 November 2009

Strengthening of local level integrated disaster risk management in three flood prone areas of DKI Jakarta namely Kampung Melayu, Cipinang Besar Utara and Penjaringan

45,000 persons (local government officials, students, teachers, CBOs, organised structures for DM and response such as SATLINMAS and RW rapid response teams)

Kelurahan Penjaringan (North Jakarta), Kampung Melayu and Cipinang Besar Utara (East Jakarta)

265,570

Disaster Preparedness in Schools in Central Java

Capacity building and training for PMI's staff and volunteers includes youth volunteers (PMR) and teachers, Awareness raising campaign and small scale mitigation

15 August 2008 14 November 2009

The capacity of target schools, communities and PMI branches to prepare, respond and mitigate the effects of disasters has been increased

22,955 persons (60 PMR volunteers; 1,267 teachers; 21,548 students and 80 CBAT members)

Cilacap and Kebumen districts, Central Java

302,182

DRC/PMI Integrated Community Based Risk Reduction Programme III (ICBRR)

Capacity building and training for PMI's staff, SATGANA, CBAT and KSR as well as teachers, Awareness raising campaign and small scale mitigation

August 2008 December 2009

The capacity of PMI branches and target communities to prepare for, respond to and mitigate the effects of disasters has been enhanced

54,260 people (300 CBAT members; 180 SATGANA and KSR member; 120 teachers; 9 PMI staffs and 22,604 students)

Polewali Mandar in West Sulawesi and Karang, Bandung and Bogor in West Java

505,622

DRR and inclusive schools: widening access for disabled children

Advocacy, awareness raising and capacity building in regards to the issue of disabled people and small scale mitigation

Oxfam GB

Save the Children


Period

15 August 2008 14 January 2010

To widen longer term access to DRR information and procedures for disabled children in inclusive schools

Strengthening the Resilience of Local Governments, Communities and other district stakeholders to natural disasters

Institutional capacity building of government and other stakeholders, capacity building and training for community and school

October 2008 December 2009

To strengthen knowledge, skills and cooperation of local governments, communities and civil society groups in Donggala districts and Sangihe district to take actions to reduce community vulnerabilities to natural disasters.

Strengthen community capacity through childled disaster preparedness and response

Institutional capacity building for government, Awareness raising and capacity building for children and community, mitigation measures

November 2008 December 2009

Implement DRR program to increase resilience and reduce the impact of disasters on children and their communities in Indonesia using community-based, childcentered and child-led approaches

3,458 people (1,658 disabled children; 5 special needs Districts of: Kota school supervisors; 7861 Yogyakarta, Sleman, teachers; 173 school Bantul, Gunung Kidul principals; 84 government and Kulon Progo in officials; 65 tutors and Yogyakarta province students from UNY; 285 community builders and 324 school board members) 24,322 people [Around 22,000 people; 56 community Sangihe district organisers; 56 teachers; (North Sulawesi) and 2,000 students; 100 Donggala district government officers; 20 staff (Central Sulawesi) of civil society groups at district level and 100 people at national level] Langkat sub-district (North Sumatra province), Aceh Tamiang sub district 26,960 people (7,374 (Aceh province), children and 19,586 adults) East and South Jakarta (DKI Jakarta province)

Total Acronyms: EWS SATLINMAS CBO RW PMI

Early Warning System Disaster Management Agency at Kelurahan Community-based Organization Rukun Warga (Neighbouring unit in Kelurahan/village) Palang Merah Indonesia (Indonesian Red Cross)

PMR SATGANA CBAT KSR UNY

Palang Merah Remaja (PMI's Youth Volunteer) Satuan Siaga Bencana (PMI's Disaster Preparedness Team) Community Based Action Team Korps Sukarelawan (PMI's volunteer corps) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (A university in Yogyakarta)

Amount EURO

249,077.81

378,558

297,395

1,998,405

13/11/52

Sixth Action Plan

School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia

DIPECHO Partners for school‐based projects • Arbeiter‐Samariter‐Bund (ASB) • Save the Children (SC) • German Red Cross (GRC)

A Joint Presentation by DRR Agencies DIPECHO National Consultative Meeting

Fact sheet of GRC Implementing partners:

Indonesian Red Cross and German Red Cross

Funding:

ECHO, under the DiPECHO programme. GRC funds 15%, a proportion which is increasing.

Budget Initially:

ERU 356.000

Time frame:

08/08 – 11/09

Number of beneficiaries:

+ 20.000

Other stakeholders:

UN Agencies, GTZ, LIPI, CDE, ORARI, Government of Indonesia (BPDP)

Outputs

1) DRR in schools linked with ICBRR and 180 PMI volunteers and focal teachers trained 2) 900 PMR youth volunteers trained as peer‐multipliers in 30 schools 3) 20,000 teachers, students, parents and community members are DRR aware 4) Four schools made into Safe places 5) CBAT and communityies mobilized for ICBRR activities and cooperating with PMR in target schools

Fact sheet ASB Implementing partners:

Arbeiter‐Samariter‐Bund (ASB) Deutschland e. V.

Funding:

ECHO, under the DiPECHO program. ASB funds 25% of total budget

Budget Initially:

Euro 286,000 (Including approved cost extension)

Time frame:

08/08 – 01/10


4.170 (Direct) 25,573 (Indirect)

Other stakeholders:

Inclusive Schools, School Committees, Community builders, Provincial and District Level Government Offices (Education, Health, Social, Bapeda)

Output

1. Increased ability of children with disabilities (CWDs) and their carers to anticipate and safely respond to disaster 2. Improved access to inclusive schools for CWDs 3. Linkages and sustainability for Government institutions

Fact sheet of Save The Children Implementing partners:

Save the Children, with local partners: ‐ Karang (in Langkat, North Sumatra), ‐ Bungong Nanggroe (Aceh Tamiang, NAD) and ‐ Perkumpulan Sahabat Akar (East and South Jakarta)

Funding:

ECHO, under the DiPECHO program. SC funds 26% of total budget, but is increasing its proportion

Budget Initially:

EUR 401,231

Time frame:

11/08 – 12/09


+ 26,960

Other stakeholders: Other stakeholders:

Government of Indonesia (BPBD Din Sos – TAGANA, PMI, CDE) Government of Indonesia (BPBD, Din Sos TAGANA PMI CDE)

Outputs

1.

2.

3. 4.

Three districts GU are knowledgeable of existing policy and have preparedness plan which take into account the needs of children and other vulnerable group in the event future emergency Capacity of LGU, community, children and schools in coping with disaster is increased (158 teachers develop DRR lesson plan, 79 schools have preparedness plan, 850 schools children trained CLDRR Enhance participation of children, community, children and schools in decision affecting their well being through drill, campaign activity Quality programming in CLDRR

Intervention areas – DiPECHO Partners GRC

ASB

SC

1

13/11/52

Challenges and Lessons learned / Recommendation Thematic Area Thematic Area

Challenges and Lessons Learned

Recommendation

District level is not all aware of DRR and disability issue (all)

Awareness rising and involving government officers at district levels in DRR program in community and school based activities (all)

No budget allocation for DRR and Policy on DRR for sustainability. (all)

Advocacy of DRR budget allocation and policy for program sustainability, including Synchronization of DRR programs with political terms ( e.g. integrated DRR in l l ( d curriculum, and policy and integrate it in Development planning….) (all)

Capacity Building Capacity Building for Government (1)

Lack ofDRR Info dissemination efforts by the government offices (G & S)


Recommendation Integrate workshops in DRR programming which can facilitate the intra governmental DRR coordination (G) Create cross‐departmental referral system regarding CWDs (A)

Not all provinces have established BPBD which should be responsible for the intra governmental DRR coordination (G) governmental DRR coordination (G)

DRR programming should support the establishment of BPBD by i.e. high level advocacy (G) advocacy (G)

DRR issues are seem as only relevant to certain government department (e.g BPBD or Kesbangpolinmas). (A)

Need for recognition that DRR matters for all government departments. (A)

Creating guide lines for dissemination, monitoring and coordination system on implanting of DRR activities (G & S)

Challenges and Lessons learned / Recommendation Thematic Area

Capacity Building for Government (2)

Challenges and Lessons Learned Government offices (health, education, social, BPBD) has no coordination regarding DRR in schools (G & A)

Recommendation

Lack of school awareness in school safety concept (all)

Strengthen DRR in framework for safety and healthy schools (structural, non‐ structural, functional) including accessibility for CWDs (all)

Using schools for community self‐reliance and sustainability (all)

Awareness for school and community around school to using school as community reliance (Focal point) (all)

W lth f DRR Wealth of DRR materials produced, but limited or t i l d d b t li it d no mechanism for consistency checking and sharing (all)

Creating mechanism for checking by C ti h i f h ki b involving other stakeholders (all)

Lack of teachers’ capacity to teach DRR for CWDs (A)

Teachers capacity building on disability awareness rising and how to teach CWDs (A)



Man‐made environmental hazards (G)

Community (1) Community (1)

School Base

More focus on raising awareness on the connection between environmental degradation and disasters (G)

Enabling communities to understand Enabling communities to understand Sustainable natural resource Sustainable natural resource the link between natural resource and management practices, climate DRR (G) change adaptation and mitigation as DRR strategies (G) Lack of financial resources to implement plans and programs for DRR (G)

Lack of monitoring system of DRR activities in schools Seting up sustainable monitoring system (A) collaborating with government (e.g. involve supervisor ‐ Pengawas ) (A) As Inclusive Education (IE) is new topic in Indonesia, there is no systematic guidelines for considering welfare of CWDs (A)

Recommendation

Sustaining disaster‐preparedness To advocate DRR to Gov and activities (non‐permanent staff, lack of integrate DRR in Gov Budget Plan funding) (G) (G)

Identification and piloting of alternative, lower‐risk livelihood activities for self fund rising. (G)

Need of creating a systematic guidelines for establishing comprehensive inclusive education. DRR should be mainstreamed into the guideline (A)



Participation of high risk communities is a key factor (all)

Recommendation

Involving of vulnerable groups (i.e, old people, disabled, children) in DRR activities (all) Training non‐leaders/ representatives of most vulnerable group of the community is helpful and effective in increasing and effective in increasing participation in DRR (all)

Community (2)

Risk‐assessment exercise with community is also an awareness raising exercise (G &A) LGUs and communities tend to focus on rescue and response instead of community‐based warning system and other disaster preparedness measures (G)

Thematic Area

Setting up community‐based early warning system is a protracted process and requires LGU commitment. (G)


Absence of detailed multi‐hazard information and vulnerability assessments (social, political, economic, environmental) (G)

Community (3) Community (3)

Recommendation

Dissemination of risk assessment results to inform / facilitate risk reduction and contingency planning (G) Integration of community‐drawn maps and results of scientific/technical studies and scientific/technical studies and mapping will provide best results (G)

Awareness raising of marginalized Improved communication within children who are not in schools are communities regarding children community and government who are not enrolled in schools. (A) responsibilities to identify and support (A)

2

13/11/52

Conclusion and Opportunities

Conclusion and Opportunities (continued)

1.Schools can be an effective platform to bring DRR committment to the communities 2.Government officials can be an effective channel to promote DRR in schools and communities – funding should be allocated to support this initiative.

7. Schools structural safety and physical and non physical accessibility should be mainstreamed into all school based DRR project.

3.In order to secure the sustainability of the project, it is vital to include political advocacy as a part of project activities, esp. lobby to achieve government budget allocation for DRR education in schools in the future.

7. Vulnerable population such as elderly and disabled people must be included into the action plan.

1. Government commitment is required in order to include DRR into curriculum.

8 DRR 8. DRR Education in communities can also be a tool to identify generally Ed ti i iti l b t l t id tif ll merginalised children (e.g. Children who have no access to education) by identifying valunrable groupd in their commuities, which contribute to MDGs.

2.Compiled experience of DRR in schools can be used to write a guideline on how to conduct school based DRR. 3. Schools with extensive DRR practice can be a focal point or model for new schools.

Collaboration among partners so far •ASB and GRC‐PMI conducted First Aid training in Yogyakarta (July 2009) •GRC staff participated and observed ASB’s training for teachers in inclusive schools (August 2009) •GRC‐PMI support as facilitator on SC camping activities in Jakarta

Challenges of coordination mechanism

Thank you

• Sharing DRR materials among agencies has been difficult due to timing and different decision making process of each organsiation. d diff td i i ki f h i ti Suggestion: Pre‐order system. Showcase of available materials prior to the proposal approval etc. •Decesion making process within each organsiation is different, therefore coordination takes time. •Creating forum for collective lessons learnt among all stakehoders (including local partners) within Indonesia would be useful.

3

13/11/52

Outline 7th

DipECHO AP National Consultative Meeting Lessons Learnt A joint presentation 21 October 2009

• A glance of ACF, DRC, and OXFAM project (5 minutes) • Lessons learnt and challenges based on th Hyogo the H Framework F k for f Action A ti (15 minutes) • Recommendation (10 minutes) • Discussion

A glance of the activities

Lessons learnt ACF, DRC, OXFAM (5 minutes photo video)

Ensure that DRR is a priority - nationally & locally Though the DM Act number 24/2007 in place, the issues are:

Challenges in the operation of the National Platform

- Need for effective socialization of the act at district and sub district level - DM Act still needs to be translated into local regulation; and needs to be i l implemented t d - Harmonization of certain government programmes/budgets with DRR recommendations

There is a need for improvement in the forum’s capacity implementation, monitoring, and evaluation

Need for awareness of DM Act to encourage implementation

1

13/11/52

Still need to integrate DRR perspective into development programmes and policies

BNPB is formed, disaster management body at district level is undergoing a transition from SATKORLAK to BPBD, but still not in all districts

Local governments are facing challenges in formalizing BPBD The number of ‘good good governance’ governance capacity building programme is increasing BNPB and national platform are expected to push the formation of BPBD at district level CSOs which work on integrating DRR in development policies are emerging There is a room for advocacy to improve the effectiveness of BPBD

Community-based disaster risk management programmes have action plans Need to integrate DRR into government’s process Community is increasingly aware there is not yet budget allocated for preparedness Re-deployment of local government officials can negate previous DRR awareness raising and advocacy

Need for support for the formation of BPBD at district level

Challenging to link community action plans into development planning, policies and budgeting

Need to raise the voices of the community, for instance, through Musrenbang There is a possibility that the DRR budget will be allocated in 2010 Development Planning Budget (APBD 2010)

Challenges in the process of identification of risks and establishing early warning

There is need for participatory community risk assessment to ensure effective disaster management

Though Early Warning System is crucial for community, they are not familiar with it

Hardness in access to EWS: - it uses high-tech language - lack of effective socialised

Need to increase awareness of local government officers on the importance of community-based disaster risk assessment Participatory risk assessment increases community’s ability to understand their capacities and vulnerabilities

CBDRM action and contingency plans must be adapted to local culture to be effective

2

13/11/52

Build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels Low understanding of risk makes community emphasize more on response

The short-term project-based approach to DRR restricts long-term mechanisms that will advocate and undertake DRR

Need for changing mindset that disaster can be controlled and managed DRR uses jargon and scientific terms making it more difficult for people to participate • Awareness raising and disaster preparedness through public campaign is effective in increasing understanding of DRR • Use simpler terms to engage community’s attention • Use creative approaches, work with local partners, exchange ideas to create successful programmes

Non-structural mitigation is affordable and can be done by community themselves

DRR effort and advocacy need sustained approach

There is a need to invest in long term organizational capacity building and support Support in community level documentation helps in cross-learning and implementation

Implementation of activities need to be documented and formalized in a Standard Operating Procedure Need of regular practice through drills and simulation To ensure that trainings and practices are relevant and effective to the community

Disaster preparedness programmes should focus more on collective action

Formulation of Standard Operating Procedure and socialization of EWS, ERT, shelter and public kitchen are crucial for effective response

3

Participants for DIPECHO - NCM in Indonesia Le Meridien Hotel Jakarta - Indonesia - 21 October 2009 organization

name

email

Position

Donors

AusAID

Stacey Greene

[email protected]

Manager, Disaster Management Unit

AusAID

Eko Setiono

[email protected]

Program Manager, Disaster Management

AusAID

Jeong Park

[email protected]

Disaster Management Adviser

AusAID

Alan March

[email protected]

Co-Director - Australian-Indonesia Facility for Disaster Reduction AIFDR

DFID

Gustya Indriani

[email protected]

Deputy Programme Manager

USAID

Yusak Oppusunggu

[email protected]

Program Specialist

Non Governmental Organization & National Agencies

ACF

Ms. Anais Lafite

[email protected]

Head of Mission

ACF

Ms. Nina Rossiana

[email protected]

Head of Progamme DRR

ASB

Ms. Sae Kani

[email protected]

Project Manager Information and Outreach Disaster Risk Reduction

ASB

Mr. Adrian Brahma

[email protected]

Project Coordinator

CARE International

Ms. Maria Teresa Bayombong

[email protected]

Country Director

Caritas Austria

Mr. Georg Matuschkowitz

[email protected]

Program Manager for Southeast Asia

Caritas Austria /CRS

Ms. Yenni Suryani

[email protected]

Head of Emergency Programming

Cordaid

Ms. Anat Prag

[email protected]

Cordaid Liaison Office for Indonesia

Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe

Mr. Renee Picasso Manoppo

[email protected] [email protected]

Program Manager

Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe

Mr. Leonardo Ratuwalangon

[email protected]

Head of Office

Hilfswerk Austria

Ms. Tutut Sri Purwanti

[email protected]

Country Manager of Indonesia

HOPE Worldwide

Mr. Charles Ham

[email protected]

Country Director

HOPE Worldwide

Mr. Donald Warouw

[email protected]

Program Manager Manokwari, Papua Barat

Handicap International

Ms. Sandrine Boulle

[email protected]

Development Manager

Handicap International

Ms. Catherine Gillet

[email protected]

Country Programme Director

Islamic Relief

Mr. MD. Mostafa Shadeque

[email protected]

Acting Head of Program

Islamic Relief

Ms. Jennifer Birch

[email protected]

Regional Programme Co-ordinator Asia Region

International Medical Corps - IMC

Mr. Jonathan Hodgdon

[email protected]

Country Director

Malteser International

Ms. Nicole Derbinski

[email protected]

Partner Project Coordinator / Liaison Officer

MDM

Mr. Robin Frederic

[email protected]

General Coordinator

Mercy Corps

Mr. Mugur Dumitrache

[email protected]

MPBI

Mr. Faisal Djalal

[email protected]

Secretary General

MPBI

Ms. Djuni P

[email protected]

Staff

Oxfam GB

Mr. Patricius Usfameny

[email protected]

DRR/CCA Coordinator

Page 1 of 3


name

email

Position

Oxfam GB

Dr. Deepmala Mahla

[email protected]

Programme Development & Funding Coordinator

Plan International

Amin Magatani

[email protected]

DRR Consultant

PMI

Ms. Bevita Dwi M


Coordinator CBDB - ICBRR

PMI - DM Division

Ms. Deasy Sujatiningrani


Disaster Management Staff

Relief International

Mr. Thomas P. Doyle

[email protected]

Global Emergency Coordinator

Save the Children

Ms. Maharani Hardjoko

[email protected]

DRR Manager / Emergency Specialist

Save the Children

Mr. Mark Fritzler

[email protected]

Country Director

TDH Italia - Terre des hommes

Mr. Bruno Neri

[email protected]

Senior Programme Officer

The Johanniter

Dr. Dagmar Buck

[email protected]

Regional Director The Johaniter

The Johanniter

Ms. Tonggo Manurung

[email protected]

Government Line Agencies or Relevant Institutions

Bappenas

Dr. Ir. Suprayoga Hadi, MSP


Deputy for Regional Development and Local Autonomy

BPPT

Dr. Iwan G. Tedjakusuma


Chief Scientist - Center of Technology for Land, Regional and Disaster Mitigation

BPPT

Ms. Diah

BNPB

Mr. Siswanto Budi Prasodjo

BNPB

Ms. Dewina Nasution, S.H, M.Si [email protected]

Head of Law & Cooperation Bureau

Social Department

Mr. Iyan Kusmadiyana, Msi

Kepala Seksi Bimbingan Teknis Kesiapsiagaan & Mitigasi

Public Works

Mr. Agus

Staff

Public Works

Mr. Taufan Adrianto, ST

Staff

Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation

Dr. Ir. Supriyati Dwi Adreastuti

Staff [email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

Director for Community Empowerment

[email protected]

Volcanic Hazard Evaluation

UN Agencies, International Organization and Red Cross

FAO

Mr. Benny Sormin

[email protected]

Assitant FAO Representative, Programme

GTZ

Mr. Raphael Anindito

[email protected]

Senior Advisor for Disaster Risk Management

IOM

Ms. Angela Stagier

[email protected]

Project Development Office

UNDP

Mr. Angger P. Wibowo

[email protected]

Programme Officer Crisis Prevention and Recovery Unit

UNDP - SCDRR

Ms. Irene Widjaya

[email protected]

Monitoring & Reporting Officer

UNDP - SCDRR

Ms. S. Agustini

[email protected]

Project Implementation Support Advisor

UNDP - SCDRR

Ms. Dian Afriyanie

[email protected]

UNDP - SCDRR

Ms. Ninil RM

[email protected]

Consultant

WFP

Mr. Utomo Tjipto

[email protected]

Programme Officer

WFP

Mr. Anthony Craig

Anthony.Craig @wfp.org

Regional Emergency Preparedness Advisor

UN-OCHA

Ms. Titi Moektijasih

[email protected]

Liaison and Coordination Officer

Page 2 of 3


name

email

Position

Danish Red Cross

Mr. Jerome Casals

[email protected]

Project Manager - ICBRR III (DIPECHO funded)

Danish Red Cross

Mr. Hans Hausman

[email protected]

Disaster Preparedness Delegate ICBRR Sulawesi Programme

French RC

Mr. Hervé Gazeau

[email protected]

Head of Programmes

German Red Cross

Mr. Lars Møller


Disaster Management delegate

German Red Cross

Mr. Nasrullah

[email protected]

Programme Officer

IFRC

Mr. Febi Dwirahmadi

[email protected]

Senior Disaster Risk Reduction Officer

Netherland Red Cross

Ms. Melanie Miltenburg

[email protected]

Programme Manager Disaster Management

EC Delegation to Indonesia and ECHO / DIPECHO SEA

EC Delegation

Mr. Muamar Vebry

[email protected]

Project Officer - Reconstruction Aceh and Java

EC Delegation

Mr. Charles Whiteley

[email protected]

First Secretary, Head of Political and Press and Information Section

ECHO Jakarta

Ms. Laurence Bardon

[email protected]

Head of Office

ECHO Jakarta

Ms. Linda Rupidara

[email protected]

Programe Officer

ECHO Jakarta

Ms. Myrna Vergiana

[email protected]

Admin & Finance Assistance

ECHO Jakarta

Ms. Bebed Praja

[email protected]

Secretary

ECHO/DIPECHO RSO BKK

Mr. Thearat Touch

[email protected]

Disaster Risk Reduction ECHO Regional Support (Bangkok)

ECHO RSO BKK

Ms. Suwannee Promyarat

[email protected]

DIPECHO Assistant ECHO Regional Support Office (Bangkok)

Page 3 of 3

Humanitarian Aid in

Indonesia

Indonesia is the world's largest archipelago. Located on the ‘ring of fire’, one of the most disaster-prone regions in the world, it is exposed to frequent earthquakes, floods and landslides. Since1994, the European Commission Humanitarian Aid department (ECHO), has allocated over €108 million to assist the victims of earthquakes, tsunamis, malnutrition and floods. In complimentarity to the humanitarian assistance, ECHO is also supporting vulnerable people living in disaster-prone areas with disaster preparedness measures. EC humanitarian aid since 1994 In response to natural disasters

€86.5 million

In response to conflict

€22million

Disaster preparedness

€4.6 million

Emergency Assistance for the victims of West Sumatra and West Java earthquakes Following the 7.9 magnitude earthquake off coast of West Sumatra followed by a 6.8 Richter scale aftershock on 30 September 2009, the European Commission approved a primary emergency decision of € 3,000,000 to respond to immediate needs in the sectors of emergency shelter, non-food items, water and sanitation, logistics including transport, as well as coordination and mapping of the international humanitarian assistance. These actions aim to provide integrated immediate relief assistance to the population affected by the West Sumatra earthquake, which is estimated of up to two million persons. These interventions will be provided for the duration of three months focusing on the most vulnerable population in the worst affected areas. Following the 7 magnitude earthquake on the south-western coast of Java on 2 September 2009, the European Commission approved an emergency decision of € 1,500,000 to respond with integrated relief support with a strong focus on temporary shelters. Preserving lives and livelihoods of vulnerable people in East Nusa tenggara (NTT)

Photo credit: Linda Rupidara, ECHO Jakarta Assisting the victims of the Yogyakarta earthquake The massive earthquake that struck the Yogyakarta Province in May 2006 left more than 6,000 dead and more than 38,000 injured while an estimated 1,500,000 were left homeless. Within hours of the earthquake, the European Commission launched a decision for initial humanitarian relief of €3 million to provide funds for vital needs such as emergency health, shelter and logistics, offered by experienced implementing partners already active in the area. A further €6.5 million to assist the most vulnerable victims followed in July 2006. The aid focused on providing emergency shelter material and tools, restoring basic water and sanitation facilities, and providing medical services and logistical support. Assisting the victims of the Indian Ocean Tsunami

In October 2008, the European Commission approved an intervention of € 2,000,000 for enhancing household and community resilience to cope with the disaster-prone environment, and to improve the nutritional status of vulnerable groups in NTT. The present intervention aims at supporting vulnerable families undergoing acute food and livelihood crisis, restoring their coping capacities while trying to introducing positive and sustainable behaviour changes. This should avoid the total exhaustion of these people's capacities to face the recurrent, smallscale natural disasters that affect them, such as floods, landslides, earthquakes, pest infestation and drought.

The earthquake and tidal waves of December 2004 killed over 170,000 people in Indonesia’s Aceh province rendering more than half a million people homeless. The Commission quickly responded by mobilizing €123 million funding to help the survivors of this unprecedented crisis across the affected region. Of this funding with approximately €60 million allocated to Aceh for provision of food, medical aid, drinking water, basic sanitation, and psychosocial support to help people overcome trauma along with livelihood recovery to help people rebuild their lives.

The comprehensive intervention will benefit 90,000 vulnerable people and will mainly focus on the reinforcement of livelihoods through seeds distribution and capacity-building, access to clean water and irrigation, promotion of good care practices for infants and mainstreaming of disaster preparedness.

Reducing the impact of natural disaster (DIPECHO) Through its Disaster Preparedness Programme DIPECHO, the European Commission Humanitarian Aid department aims at building the resilience of communities that face recurrent disasters, in particular floods, earthquakes and forest fires, both in urban and rural areas of Indonesia.

Assisting the victims of floods In January and February 2007, two funding decisions for the disastrous floods in Aceh, Jakarta and the surrounding area were addressed through a total funding of €1.6 million focusing on the immediate relief for thousands of vulnerable displaced populations, through provision of water, essential food and non-food items such as cooking utensils and tarpaulins, medical care and nutritional assistance in particular to children and pregnant and lactating mothers. The Aceh flood response

In the current Action Plan (2008-2010), the DIPECHO programme activities are expanded to cover more disaster prone areas in the country - further supporting communities resilient in a multi-hazard framework and clear programming strategy in mainstreaming disaster risk reduction (DRR) perspective and approach. Last updated: October 2009

Humanitarian Aid in

Indonesia

Food & Livelihoods

WATSAN Health Shelter & NFIs Disaster Preparedne Nutrition Others

ECHO/DIPECHO On-going projects 2008-2009 Primary Emergency Decision West Sumatra Earthquake Partner OXFAM

Amount (€) 800,000

Netherlands/France Red Cross

815,000

IOM (incl logistics)

924,000

MERCY CORPS

280,160

UN OCHA (coordination)

167,570

MAP ACTION (coordination)

13,270

TOTAL

3,000,000

DISASTER PREPAREDNESS

Ad Hoc Decision- NTT Partner

Amount (€)

Partner

Amount (€)

OXFAM - UK

378,558


215,288

246,802

Danish Red Cross/PMI

505,622

FAO

548,500

German Red Cross/ PMI

302,182

CARE NEDERLAND

350,000


265,570

WFP

600,000

Save the Children (SC)

397,395

IFRC (regional)

61,500


254,698

OXFAM- UK

TOTAL

2,000,000

TOTAL

2,126,115

About European Commission humanitarian aid: The Humanitarian Aid department (ECHO) is part of the European Commission, the European Union’s executive arm. It comes under direct responsibility of Karel De Gucht, European Commissioner for European Development and Humanitarian Aid. Through ECHO funding, nearly 20 million people are helped each year in more than 90 countries through 200 partners (NGOS, International organizations, the Red Cross and Red Crescent movement, and UN agencies). Web: http://ec.europa.eu/echo For more information contact ECHO’s Field Office In Jakarta, Tel: + 62 (21) 573 8308 Laurence Bardon, Technical Assistant for Indonesia e-mail: [email protected]

Last updated: October 2009

DIPECHO National Consultative Meeting Jakarta, 21 October 2009 Remarks by Mr Charles Whiteley, First Secretary, Head of Political, Press and Information Section. Delegation of the European Commission to Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam.

Distinguished guests, Ladies and gentlemen, It is a great pleasure for me to open today’s Consultative Meeting and to see the large numbers who have responded to the invitation of the European Commission. The idea behind this event is to bring together representatives of the Government and various stakeholders to reflect on strategic and programming issues for disaster risk reduction actions. From the European Commission's perspective, this event will also be very useful in helping us prepare the programming of our future assistance through the EC's Disaster Preparedness programme – I imagine most of you will be familiar with this programme, DIPECHO. Indonesia has made outstanding progress in mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) with a lot of efforts put in place and put into government's agenda echoing the importance of DRR. The last similar consultative meeting on disaster preparedness was held in December 2007. Since then, there have been a number of major developments worth highlighting and which show a clear shift from a response mindset to a risk reduction mindset: - The institutionalisation of BNPB as mandated by the Law No.24/2007 evolved following the enactment of the Law. - The Indonesia DRR National Platform was launched in April 2009, following a three year maturation process. This forum is particularly relevant and will facilitate greatly information sharing and advocacy. It will help promoting strategic collaboration and partnerships between governmental and non governmental actors toward improved DRR programming and implementation. The European Commission through ISDR was a sponsor in this process.

1

- Furthermore important is the government policy on mainstreaming DRR into development planning, in particular into the Government Annual Plan, Mid Term as well as Long Term Development Plans. - Regional initiatives should also be acknowledged and appraised: the ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response – AADMER – will enter into force very soon. It will be the first ever regional agreement with binding commitments to the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action. - On our side, the European Union recently adopted a common Disaster Risk reduction Strategy for its assistance to third countries. This will certainly enhance the way the EU Members Sates and the European Commission design and implement assistance programmes with a way to build safer and more resilient communities, countries and regions. - In Indonesia, a large number of community-based disaster risk reduction pilot actions have been tested over years through DIPECHO, the World Bank's Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, JICA's Capacity Building initiatives and numerous other initiatives. A number of these are mature enough to be promoted and disseminated, through the large ongoing DRR programmes but also through Indonesian stakeholders themselves. One of these initiatives is the “Safer Communities through Disaster Risk Reduction (SC-DRR), launched in September 2007. This is a joint programme of the Government of Indonesia, represented by the National Development Planning Body (Bappenas) and the National Coordinating Agency for Disaster Management (BNPB), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), financially supported by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development, AusAID, as well as the European Commission through ISDR. The recent earthquakes remind us, if needed, of the importance to address Disaster Risk reduction as an integrated approach from national down to community level, if we want to save lives and reduce vulnerabilities. I would like to take this opportunity to voice again the European Commission’s sympathy to the victims of the disasters. We can only hope that there will be less and less victims in the events we know will continue occurring. This can take place only through the strict enforcement of preventive measures and through better prepared communities. In this context, it was very positive to hear from our implementing partners in West Java and West Sumatra that the communities targeted had been not only better protected but also able to assist immediately in the relief efforts. The European Commission Humanitarian aid department (ECHO) responded to both situations, with 3 million Euros in a fast-track decision to bring relief to earthquake victims in West Sumatra and 1,5 millions to assist the victims of 2

the West Java earthquake with integrated relief support with a strong focus on temporary shelters. These programmes are running in parallel to disaster preparedness measures funded under DIPECHO in Indonesia, which focus on community-based disaster preparedness, community based DRR at school and mainstreaming DRR actions at district and villages, on capacitybuilding of the Red Crescent Society. Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to end with a few words about the DIPECHO programme itself. DIPECHO has been active in Indonesia since 1998, providing grants amounting to some €5 million (approx IDR 72 billion) for 18 actions across the country. The success of the projects funded is of course a great credit to the implementing agencies, and I would like to thank all our DIPECHO partners and their local counterparts for their excellent work over these years. I would also like to thanks the Government of Indonesia in particular BNPB, BAPPENAS and all relevant agencies for their longstanding and continuing support. The nature of DIPECHO is such that it will remain focused on pilot actions and the promotion of good practice. There will certainly be scope for continued pilot innovative measures at local level. However, we would like the next cycle to go a step further in promoting some of the tools, methodologies and models already developed, in transmitting this knowledge and skills to others actors and to other on-going and planned programmes, while accompanying the implementation of the Strategic National action Plan on DRR and contributing to the National Platform’s efforts. In Indonesia, DIPECHO will continue supporting integrated approaches to DRR. At the same time, those who have taken part in DIPECHO actions know well that solutions lie in a much wider environment than the Programme itself. It is the task of all concerned – national and local government, civil society and the private sector, to be more involved in the DRR agenda, with the continued support of the international community. I wish you a fruitful session today. The contributions and outcomes of today's meeting will be compiled and disseminated, and will serve for further work and improved programming, certainly for the DIPECHO programme, and I hope also for other actors. Finally, let’s not forget that the theme of this year’s International DRR celebrations in Indonesia is "Institutional Capacity Building in Disaster Risk Reduction". We are glad that today’s event can contribute to this National DRR Month. Terima kasih dan sukses untuk kita semua.

3

European Commission DRR Framework & Disaster Preparedness Programme – DIPECHO Republic of Indonesia

In May 2009, the European Union (EU) adopted a Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Strategy for its external assistance framework. This Strategy will help enhancing the DRR contribution of the European Commission to numerous countries, including the republic of Indonesia and the linkages between DRR and Climate Change Adaptation measures. Another contribution of the European Commission to DRR in the country is made through its Disaster Preparedness Programme, DIPECHO. DIPECHO has been funding projects in South East Asia since 1998, with over € 30 million, 14% of which went to the Republic of Indonesia. Funding is bi-annual, channelled through the European commission Humanitarian Aid department’s traditional partners: EU-based Non-Governmental Organisations, the Red Cross / Red Crescent family, United Nations Agencies, as well as International Organisations. DIPECHO partners however work closely with Governments and local organisations – in most cases the latter are co-implementing agencies.

DIPECHO Partners Indonesia (*regional component)

DIPECHO Indonesia 1998-2008 (regional included)

600 500 400 300 200 100 0

2500 1998 2000

2000 1500

PC * IF RC

AD P CA ES UN

2004

1000

2006

500

*

SC

C

C

B AS

DR

GR

M

-U AC K FFR CA RE -N L

2002

FA OX

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

2008

0

Funding (,000 EUR) projects

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008

The proposed date of 21st October meeting will aim at sharing the experience developed, as well as working on the proposed priorities for the DIPECHO next Action Plan. The meeting is part of a process to improve coherence between all DRR programmes, as well as to see how DIPECHO can better contribute to these. DIPECHO’s priorities will remain centered around the promotion of the community-based DRR pilots developed, as well as the development of new, innovative pilots. The Meeting will involved various stakeholders from the Government, implementing agencies, donors, media, among others – any interested representative involved in DRR programmes, or looking at improving DRR integration into their own programmes.

For more information, see: DIPECHO webpage: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/aid/dipecho_en.htm DIPECHO SEA 6th Action Plan: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/funding/decisions/2008/dipecho_s_e_asia_en.pdf DIPECHO project sheets (5th and 6th Action Plan): http://www.adpc.net/v2007/Programs/DMS/DIPECHOSouthEastAsiaFifthActionPlan(2006-2008)/Default.asp Outcome of the previous DIPECHO Consultative Meetings and information sessions for interested applicants (2008): http://www.adpc.net/v2007/Programs/DMS/DIPECHOSouthEastAsiaFifthActionPlan(2006-2008)/Default.asp European Union Communication on DRR in developing countries: http://ec.europa.eu/development/policies/9interventionareas/environment_en.cfm

Attached: List of on-going projects funded in Indonesia during the 7th Action Plan

DIPECHO South East Asia CONSULTATIVE MEETINGS JULY OCTOBER 2009 in. Indonesia (21 October)

Recommend Documents