45
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Anis SD. 1992. Pengaruh Kepadatan dan Interval Pemotongan Gliricida sepium Terhadap Produksi dan Mutu Hijauan di Lahan Pertanaman Kelapa.[Tesis].Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, KPK Insitut Pertanian Bogor-Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Anggrodi R.1990. Ilmu Makanan Ternak Umum. Cetakan ketiga. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. [AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 17 th Ed . Washington: AOAC International. Astuti M, M Bell, P Sitorus, GE Bradford.1984. The impact of altitude on sheep and goat production. Working paper No.30.SR-CRSP/Balitnak. Bogor. Beever DE, Offer N, Gill M. 2000. The Feeding value of Grass product. In Hopkins A. Editor. Grass: Its Production and Utilization. Published for British Grassland Soc. By Beckwell Science 141-195. Beaucheimin KA. 1996. Using ADF and NDF in dairy cattle diet formulation-a Western Canadian prespective. J Anim Feed Sci Tech 58:101-111. Bulo D, Warren BE, Ivory DA. 1985. Nutritive Value Assessment of Grass and Legume Spesies.[Annual Report].Balai Penelitian Ternak, Ciawi.Indonesia. Annual Report-Forage Research Project pp 40-41. Chiy PC, Philips CJC. 1997. Effect of Sodium Fertilizer on the Chemical Compostion of Perennial Ryegras and white clover leaves of different physiological ages. J Sci Food Agric 73: 337-348. Church DC, Pond WG.1995. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. 4 York: New York Press.
th
Ed. New
Crowder LV, Chheda HR. 1982. Tropical Grassland Husbandry. London and New York. Longman Press. Devendra C, Burns M. 1994. Produksi Kambing di Daerah Tropis. Terjemahan Harya Putra. ITB Bandung dan Universitas Udayana. Dhanda JS et al. 2003. Goat meat production: Present status and future possibilities. AJAS 16: 1842 – 1852.
46
[Ditjennak] Direktorat Jendral Peternakan. 2007. Kebijakan Pengembangan Ternak Kambing Dalam Upaya Pemenuhan Kuota Ekspor ke Timur Tengah. Semiloka Pengembangan Kambing Boerawa. Lampung. 29 – 30 Juli 2007. Direktorat Perbibitan. Ditjen Peternakan. Departemen Pertanian. hlm 1-10. Ella A. 1996. Produktivitas dan kualitas hijauan leguminosa pakan (Flamengia congesta dan Desmodium rensonii) pada pola tanam tumpang sari sengan tanaman jagung. [Disertasi]. Bogor. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Ginting SP, Mahmalia Fera. 2008. Kambing Boerka: Kambing Tipe Pedaging Hasil Persilangan Boer x Kacang. Wartazoa 18: 117-127. Greyling JPC. 2000. Reproduction traits in the Boer Goat does. J Small Rumin 36: 171 – 177. Hassen A, Rethman NFG, Van Niekerk, Tjelele TJ. 2007. Influence of Season/year and Species on Chemical Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Five Indigofera accessions. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 136:312–322 Haude ME .1997. Identification and Classification of Colorants used during Mexicos early Colonial Period. Book and Paper Group Annual Vol.16. The American Institute of Conservation. pp 16-05. Hegarty MP, Pound AW. 1968. Indospicine a New Hepatotoxic Amino Acid from Indigofera Spicata. J Aust Agric Res 217: 354-355 Herlinae. 2003. Evaluasi nilai nutrisi dan potensi hijuan asli lahan gambut pedalaman di Kalimantan Tengah sebagai Pakan Ternak. [Tesis]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Humphreys LR. 1978. Tropical Pasture and Fodder Crops. London: Longman Group Press. Hoffman PC, Shaver RD, Combs DK. 2001. Focus on Forage. Vol 3: No 10. Horne PM, WW Stur. 1999. Mengembangkan Teknologi Hijauan Makanan Ternak Bersama Petani Kecil. ACIAR. Monograf ACIAR no 65. Jia ZH, Sahlu I, Fernandez JM, Hart,SP, The TH. 1995. Effect of Dietary Protein Level on Performan of Angora and Chasmere. Small Ruminant Research. J Int Goat Assoc 16 (2) : 113-119. Jung HG, MS Allen. 1995. Characteristics of Plant Cell Walls Affecting Intake and Digestibility of Forages by Ruminants. J Anim Sci 73: 2774–2790.
47
Kabaija E, Smith OB. 1989. Influence of Season and Age of Regrowth on The Mineral Profile of Gliricidia sepiem and Leucaena leucophala. J Trop Agric 66: 125-128. Kabi F. Bareeba FB. 2008. Herbage biomass production and nutritive value of mulberry (Morus alba) and Calliandra calothyrsus harvested at different cutting frequencies. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 140:178–190. Karachi M, 1997. Growth and Nutritive Value of Lablab purpureas accessions in Semi-arid Kenya. J Trop Grassl 31: 214-218. Karim AB, Rhodes ER, Savill PS. 1991. Effect of Cutting Interval on Dry Matter Yield of of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) De Wit. J Agrofor Syst 16: 129– 137. Lioger HA .1990. Plantes Medicinals de Puerto Reis Caribe. Inc San Juan. Press inc. Lu CD, Kawas JR, Mahgoub OG. 2005. Fibre digestion and utilization in goats. J Small Rumin Res 60: 45-52. Luginbuhl JM, Poore MH, Conrad AP. 2000. Effect of level of whole cootonseed on intake, digestibility and performance of growing male goats fed haybased diets. J Anim Sci 78: 1677-1683. Luginbuhl JM, Poore MH. 2005. Nutrition of Meat Goats. EAH Webmaster, Departement of Animal Science. NCSU Lukhele MS, Van Ryssen JBJ. 2002. The Chemical Composition and Potensial Nutritive Value of The Foliage of Four Subtropical Tree Spesies in South Africa for Ruminants. SAJ Anim Sci 33: 132-141. Mahgoub O, Lu CD, Hameed CD, Richie A, Al-Halhali AS, Annamalia K. 2005. Performance of Omani Goats fed diets containing various metabolizable energy densities. J Small Rumin Res 58:175-180. McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD and Morgan CA. 2002. Animal Nutrition, 6 th Ed. London. Pretice Hall. McDowell.1992. Mineral in Animal and Human Nutrition. Academic Press Inc. Merkel RC et al.1999. Growth Potensial of five Sheep Genotypes in Indonesia. Small Ruminant Research. J Int Goat Assoc 16 (2) : 113-119. Nohong B. 2002. Produktivitas dan kualitas tanaman campuran alang-alang dengan Pueraria (Pueraria javanica Beth). Buletin Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak 3(1): 33-40.
48
Nurjannah. 2006. Evaluasi Nutrisi Hijauan Lahan Gambut Kalimantan tengah Pada kambing kacang.[Tesis]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor [NRC] National Research Council.1981. Angora, Dairy and Meat Goats in Temperate and Tropical Countries. Washington DC: National Academy Press. [NRC] National Research Council. 1995. Nutrient Requirment of Goats. Washington DC: National Academy Press. [NRC] National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. Washington DC: National Academy Press Parakkasi A. 1995. Ilmu Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak Ruminan. Vol 1B. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Perevolotsky A.1993. Nutritional Value of Common Oak (Quercus calliprinus) Browse as Fodder for Goats: Experimental results in ecological perspective. J Small Rumin Res 11: 95–106. Peterson PR. 2005. Forage for Goat Production. Blacksburg. Dept. Virginia Tech University Rahman S. 2002. Introduksi Tanaman Makanan Ternak di Lahan Perkebunan: respon bebebrapa jenis tanaman makanan ternak terhadap naungan dan tata laksana pemotongan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Peternakan 4 (1) : 4653. Reid RL, GA Jung, WV Thayne. 1988. Relationships Between Nutritive Quality and Fiber Components of Cool Season and Warm Season Forages: A retrospective study. J Anim Sci 66 : 1275–1291. Rosenthal GA. 1982. Plant Nonprotein Amino and Imino Acids. New York and London. Academic Press. Sarwono B. 2003. Beternak Kambing Unggul. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya. SAS 1989. SAS User’s Guide. Version 6. 12th edition Vol.2. SAS Institute, Cary NC. Shehu Y, Alhassan WS, PAL UR, Phillips CSJ. 2001. Yield and Chemical Composition Response of Lablab purpureus to Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizers. J Trop Grassl 35: 180-185.
49
Simanihuruk K. 2005. Pemanfaatan kulit buah markisa (Passiflora edulis Sims f. Edulis Deg) sebagai pakan campuran pakan pelet komplit untuk kambing kacang.[Tesis]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. Ed ke–2 Sumantri B, penerjemah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Terjemahan dari: The Principle and Prosedure of Statistics. Suryahadi.1990. Penuntun Praktikum Ilmu Nutrisi Ruminansia. Bogor. Pusat Antar Universitas. Program Studi Ilmu Hayat. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Sutardi T. 1980. Landasan Ilmu Nutrisi. Bogor. Departemen Ilmu Makanan Ternak. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Thapa B, Walker DH, Sinclair FL. 1997. Indigenous knowledge of feeding value of tree fodder. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 67:97–114. Thompson FN, Stuedemann JA. 1993. Pathophysiology of Fescue Toxicosis. J Agric Ecos 44: 263-281.. Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Br Grassl Soc 18:104–111. Tjelele TJ. 2006. Dry Matter Production, Intake and Nutritive Value of Certain Indigofera Spesies [Tesis]. Pretoria. M.Inst. Agrar. University of Pretoria. Van DTT, Mui NT, Ledin I. 2005. Tropical Foliages: effect of presentation method and spesies on intake by goats. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 118: 117. Van Hao N, Inger L. 2001. Performance of growing fed Gliricidia maculata. J Small Rumin Res 39: 113-119. Van Soest PJ.1982. Nutrition Ecology in Ruminant. USA. Camstock Publising Assoation. Cornell University Press. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597. Water CJ, Givens DI. 1992. Nitrogen Degradability of Fresh Herbage: effect of maturity and growth type and prediction from chemical composition and by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 75: 3278-3286. Whitehed DC. 2000. Nutrient Element in Grassland: Soil,Plant, Animal Relationship. Wallingford. CAB International Publising 367.
50
Lampiran 1 Layout Tata Letak Penelitian
K1
P1 T3
P3 T2
P2 T1
P2 T2
P2 T3
P1 T1
P3 T1
P3 T3
P1 T2
P2 T2
P1 T3
P2 T3
P1 T2
P3 T1
P3 P3
P2 T1
P1 T1
P3 T2
P3 T1
P3 T2
P2 T1
P2 T3
P1 T2
P1 T1
P2 T2
P1 T3
P3 T3
P3 T2
P1 T3
P1 T2
P3 T1
P1 T1
P2 T2
P2 T1
P3 T3
P2 T3
2m K2
2m K3
2m
K4
P = Interval pemotongan Indigofera sp (P1: 30 hari. P2 : 60 hari . P3: 90 hari) T = Intensitas Pemotongan Indigofera sp ( T1 : 0.5 m, T2 : 1.0 m, T3 : 1.5 m)
51
Lampiran 2 Data Curah Hujan Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2009
Jumlah Curah Hujan
Curah Hujan Tahun 2009 (mm) Januari Februari Maret April 1.509 582 4.685 1.402
Sumber Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Sumatera Utara
Mei 3.012
Juni 7.533
52
Lampiran 3 Analisis Sidik Ragam Produksi BK Indigofera sp General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB
JK
3 2 2 4 24 35
KT
14.98 884.95 1012.83 141.94 38.31 2093.03
4.99 442.47 506.41 35.48 1.59
F hit Sig P<0.05
3.13 277.15 317.20 22.23
0.04 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Uji Lanjut Duncan Produksi BK Indigofera sp Duncan Grouping Mean A 33.2525
N 4
Perlakuan P3T3
STD 1.11
A
31.2250
4
P2T3
2.06
B
28.9425
4
P3T2
1.68
C
22.8275
4
P3T1
1.02
D
20.6950
4
P2T2
0.87
D
20.1475
4
P1T3
1.45
E
17.4025
4
P1T2
0.74
F
11.6350
4
P2T1
0.71
F
11.2450
4
P1T1
0.27
53
Lampiran 4 Analisis Sidik Ragam Jumlah Cabang Indigofera sp General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: Sumber Keragaman P<0.05 Blok Interval (P) Intensitas(T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB 3 2 2 4 24 35
JK 33.35 17.37 774.04 24.57 39.63 888.98
KT 11.11 8.68 387.02 6.14 1.65
F hit 6.73 5.26 234.38 3.72
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping Duncan Grouping
Mean
N
INTER
STD
A
27.665
4
P3T3
1.50
A
27.583
4
P2T3
2.36
B
23.750
4
P1T3
3.51
C
20.085
4
P3T2
1.68
C
19.833
4
P2T2
1.35
C
19.250
4
P1T2
1.76
D
15.168
4
P1T1
1.15
D
15.165
4
P3T1
0.69
D
14.753
4
P2T1
1.00
Sig 0.0019 0.0127 0.0001 0.0171
54
Lampiran 5 Analisis Sidik Ragam Rasio Daun/Batang General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB 2 2 2 4 24 35
JK 0.02 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.04 23.11
KT 0.01 0.06 0.002 0.007 0.0018
F hit 2.21 11.80 0.52 1.30
Sig P<0.05 0.1420 0.0007 0.6018 0.3119
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping Duncan Grouping
Mean
N
INTER
STD
A
2.63750
4
P1T2
0.05
A
2.61750
4
P1T1
0.03
A
2.60500
4
P1T3
0.03
B
1.73750
4
P2T3
0.04
B
1.73250
4
P2T2
0.06
B
1.68500
4
P2T1
0.03
C
0.72000
4
P3T3
0.03
D
0.64500
4
P3T1
0.03
D
0.62250
4
P3T2
0.02
55
Lampiran 6 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Bahan Organik General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB 2 2 2 4 16 26
UJI LANJUT DUNCAN INTERVAL MEAN P1 90.28 P2 89.24 P3 88.73
JK 2.68 11.22 2.87 1.82 6.55 25.17
N 3 3 3
KT 1.34 5.61 1.43 0.45 0.40
F hit Sig P<0.05 3.27 0.06 13.69 0.00 3.51 0.05 1.12 0.38
DUNCAN GROUPING A B B
56
Lampiran 7 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Protein Kasar General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB 2 2 2 4 16 26
UJI LANJUT DUNCAN INTERVAL MEAN P1 21.61 P2 25.69 P3 23.27
JK
KT
0.59 75.74 1.48 0.37 9.40 87.59
0.29 37.87 0.74 0.09 0.58
N 3 3 3
F hit Sig P<0.05 0.51 64.46 1.26 0.16
0.61 0.00 0.30 0.95
DUNCAN GROUPING C A B
57
Lampiran 8 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan NDF General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: NDF Sumber Keragaman
dB
KT
F hit
Sig P<0.05
Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
2 2 2 4
JK 0.10 11.65 0.42 4.29
0.05 5.82 0.21 1.07
0.77 86.54 3.13 15.95
0.48 0.00 0.07 0.00
16 26
1.07 17.55
0.06
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping Duncan Grouping
Mean
N
INTER
STD
A
36.8367
3
P3T1
0.32
A
36.7967
3
P3T2
0.51
A
36.6433
3
P2T2
0.25
A
36.5633
3
P3T3
0.15
B
36.0733
3
P2T3
0.20
B
35.8133
3
P1T1
0.13
C
35.3667
3
P2T1
0.21
D
34.8267
3
P1T2
0.13
D
34.7400
3
P1T3
0.16
58
Lampiran 9 Analisis Sidik Ragam kandungan ADF General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman
dB
JK
KT
F hit
Sig P<0.05
Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
2 2 2 4
0.76 0.40 7.45 1.79
0.38 0.23 3.72 0.44
2.72 1.65 26.47 3.18
16 26
2.25 12.73
0.14
Mean
N
INTER
STD
A
25.2933
3
P2T1
0.34
BA
24.6667
3
P1T1
0.58
BA
24.6433
3
P2T2
0.13
BAC
24.5700
3
P3T1
0.61
BDC
24.2667
3
P3T2
0.20
EDC
23.8633
3
P1T2
0.44
ED
23.7200
3
P1T3
0.59
ED
23.7000
3
P3T3
0.16
E
23.2533
3
P2T3
0.23
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping
0.09 0.22 0.00 0.04
59
Lampiran 10 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Kalsium General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB 2 2 2 4 16 26
JK
KT
F hit
0.02 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.27
0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.21 11.80 0.52 1.30
Sig P<0.05 0.14 0.00 0.60 0.31
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping INTERVAL P1 P2 P3
MEAN 1.54 1.47 1.37
N 3 3 3
DUNCAN GROUPING A AB C
60
Lampiran 11 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Fosfor General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensita (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB 2 2 2 4 16 26
JK 0.003 0.18 0.24 0.07 0.03 0.53
KT 0.001 0.09 0.12 0.01 0.00
F hit Sig P<0.05 0.84 0.44 44.83 0.00 59.28 0.00 8.80 0.00
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping Duncan Grouping
Mean
N
INTER
STD
A
1.11
3
P1T2
0.02
A
1.08
3
P2T2
0.01
B
0.97
3
P1T3
0.07
B
0.94
3
P3T2
0.04
B
0.93
3
P2T1
0.04
B
0.91
3
P1T1
0.05
C
0.83
3
P3T3
0.05
C
0.83
3
P2T3
0.05
D
0.63
3
P3T1
0.04
61
Lampiran 12 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan in vitro Bahan Kering General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interaksi P*T Galat Total
dB 2 2 2 4 16 26
JK 0.85 230.14 26.60 2.42 5.91 265.94
KT 0.42 115.07 13.30 0.60 0.36
F hit Sig P<0.05 1.15 0.34 311.44 0.00 36.00 0.00 1.64 0.21
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping Duncan Grouping
Mean
N
INTER
STD
A
77.1300
3
P2T3
0.49
BA
76.0833
3
P2T2
0.55
BC
75.0333
3
P2T1
0.51
C
74.9533
3
P1T3
0.82
C
74.0700
3
P1T2
0.43
D
72.6533
3
P1T1
0.71
E
70.8667
3
P3T3
0.60
F
68.3833
3
P3T2
0.43
F
68.0267
3
P3T1
0.82
62
Lampiran 13 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan in Vitro Bahan Organik General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: KCBO Sumber Keragaman Blok Interval (P) Intensitas (T) Interakasi P*T Galat Total
dB 2 2 2 4 16 26
JK 1.67 143.82 12.60 4.92 4.20 167.23
KT 0.83 71.91 6.30 1.23 0.26
F hit 3.19 273.64 23.98 4.68
Sig P<0.05 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping
Mean
N
INTER
STD
A
74.9833
3
P2T3
0.62
B
73.2967
3
P2T2
0.90
B
72.3267
3
P2T1
0.49
C
71.1600
3
P1T3
0.44
C
70.7000
3
P1T1
0.52
C
70.1533
3
P1T2
0.47
D
68.6833
3
P3T3
0.23
D
68.1000
3
P3T2
0.72
E
66.8667
3
P3T1
0.50
63
Lampiran 14 Analisis Sidik Ragam Konsumsi Bahan Kering General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman BLOK Linier Kuadratik Kubik PERLAKUAN Galat Total
dB 4 1 1 1 3 12 19
JK 6295.27 17728.31 3116.10 5791.21 25160.73 4946.03 36402.03
KT F hit Sig P<0.05 1573.81 3.82 0.03 17728.31 43.01 0.00 3116.10 7.56 0.01 5791.21 14.05 0.00 8386.91 20.35 0.00 412.16
Lampiran 15 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Kering General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: Sumber Keragaman BLOK Linier Kuadratik Kubik PERLAKUAN Galat Total
dB 4 1 1 1 3 12 19
JK 80.65 456.03 3.07 16.14 741.20 119.85 941.71
KT 20.16 456.03 3.07 16.14 247.06 9.98
F hit Sig P<0.05 2.02 0.15 45.66 0.00 0.31 0.58 1.62 0.22 24.74 0.00
Lampiran 16 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Organik General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman Blok Perlakuan Linear Kuadratik Kubik Galat Total
dB 4 3 1 1 1 12 19
JK 66.01 682.17 410.62 1.33 10.34 119.01 867.20
KT 16.50 227.39 410.62 1.33 10.34 9.91
F hit 1.66 22.93 41.40 0.13 1.04
Sig P<0.05 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.32
64
Lampiran 17 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Protein Kasar General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman BLOK Perlakuan Linear Kuadratik Kubik Galat Total
dB 4 3 1 1 1 12 19
JK 30.97 1869.34 1290.49 81.87 7.05 65.81 1966.13
KT 7.74 623.11 1290.49 81.87 7.05 5.48
F hit Sig P<0.05 1.41 0.28 113.61 0.00 235.29 0.00 14.93 0.00 1.29 0.27
Lampiran 18 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan NDF General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman Blok Perlakuan Linier Kuadratik Kubik Galat Total
dB 4 3 1 1 1 12 19
JK 70.82 498.88 175.81 22.17 39.98 50.35 430.00
KT 17.70 166.29 175.81 22.17 39.98 4.19
F hit Sig P<0.05 6.84 0.00 64.21 0.00 41.90 0.00 5.28 0.04 9.53 0.00
Lampiran 19 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan ADF General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman Blok Perlakuan Linier Kuadratik Kubik Galat Total
dB 4 3 1 1 1 12 19
JK 70.82 498.88 218.55 45.26 47.03 31.07 600.78
KT 17.70 166.29 218.55 45.26 47.03 2.58
F hit Sig P<0.05 6.84 0.00 64.21 0.00 84.39 0.00 17.48 0.00 18.16 0.00
65
Lampiran 20 Analisis Sidik Ragam Pertambahan Bobot Badan Harian General Linear Models Procedure Sumber Keragaman Blok Perlakuan Linier Kuadratik Kubik Galat Total
dB 4 3 1 1 1 12 19
JK 240.07 1869.76 1234.32 0.00 21.14 219.42 2329.26
KT 60.01 623.25 1234.32 0.00 21.14 18.28
F hit 3.28 34.09 67.50 0.00 1.16
Sig P<0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.30
Lampiraan 21 Analisis Sidik Ragam Efisiensi Penggunaan Pakan General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman Blok Perlakuan Linier Kuadratik Kubik Galat Total
dB 4 3 1 1 1 12 19
JK 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
KT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
F hit 1.97 13.71 1.91 2.06 0.03
Sig P<0.05 0.16 0.00 0.19 0.17 0.86
