THE READING COMPREHENSION OF HORTATORY EXPOSITION TEXT OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MA MIFTAHUL HUDA RAGUKLAMPITAN BATEALIT JEPARA IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015 BY USING SUMMARIZING STRATEGIES
By NOR ALIEM NIM. 201032135
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY MURIA KUDUS UNIVERSITY 2014
THE READING COMPREHENSION OF HORTATORY EXPOSITION TEXT OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MA MIFTAHUL HUDA RAGUKLAMPITAN BATEALIT JEPARA IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015 BY USING SUMMARIZING STRATEGIES
SKRIPSI Presented to the University of Muria Kudus in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completing the Sarjana Program in English Education
By Nor Aliem NIM. 201032135
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY MURIA KUDUS UNIVERSITY 2014
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
Motto: “Be a strong wall in the hard times and be a smiling sun in the good timesand Honesty is the currency of wherever you are.”
Dedication: This skripsi is dedicated to: 1. Allah SWT 2. The prophet Muhammad SAW 3. The writer’s parents 4. The writer’s siblings 5. The writer’s friends
iv
ADVISORS’ APPROVAL
This is to certify that the Skripsi of Nor Aliem (2010 32 135) has been approved by the skripsi advisors for further approval by the Examining Committee.
Kudus, Advisor I
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd NIP. 19570616 198403 1 015
Kudus, Advisor II
Junaidi, S.Pd, M.Pd___ NIS. 0610701000001225
Acknowledged by The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Dr. Drs. Slamet Utomo, M.Pd. NIP. 19621219 1987031 015
v
EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL
This is to certify that the Skripsi of Nor Aliem (NIM: 2010-32-135) has been approved by the Examining Committee as a requirement for the Sarjana Degree of English Education
Kudus, 30 August 2014 Skripsi Examining Committee
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd.
, Chairperson
NIP. 19570616 198403 1 015
Junaidi, S.Pd, M.Pd___
, Member
NIS. 0610701000001225
Dra. Sri Endang K, M.Pd NIS. 0610713020001009
, Member
Aisyah Ririn PU, SS, M.Pd NIS. 060701000001228
, Member
Acknowledged by The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Dean,
Dr. Drs. SlametUtomo, M.Pd. NIP. 19621219 198703 1 015
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thanks God for the blessing, mercy and compassionate given to the writer, so that the writer can accomplish this final project entitled “The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 Taught By Using Summarizing Strategy.” The writer realizes that he is not able to complete his final project without support, advice, and encouragement for many people. Therefore, the writer would like to express his sincerest gratitude, to those who are directly or indirectly involved in the completion of this final project. They are: 1. Dr. Drs. Slamet Utomo, M.Pd., as the Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University. 2. Diah Kurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd., as the Head of English Education Department. 3. Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd as the writer’s first advisor, who guided, gave so many suggestions and also motivations to the writer in doing this research. 4. Junaidi, S.Pd, M.Pd., as the writer’s second advisor, who also guided, gave corrections, and also suggestions to the writer in doing this research. 5. Syakirin, S.H.I., as the headmaster of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara, who gave permission to the writer to conduct the research in MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara.
vii
6. Nurhasan, S.Pd., as the English teacher of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara, who guided and gave suggestions to the writer when doing research in MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara 7. All of the students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara, especially the seventh grade students who helped him in teaching, so this research could run well. 8. All of the lecturers of UMK who taught him during studying at the campus. 9. The writer’s parents (Mr. Roziqin Anwar and Mrs. Sunarsih), siblings (Ida Lafida, Diva Ramadaniawati), and the entire families who always give support and motivation to him. 10. The writer’s friends that cannot be mentioned one by one. Besides that, the writer apologies for any mistakes and happily receive any constructive criticism and suggestion, but the writer hopes that it will be useful for those especially who are in the field of education.
Kudus, September 2014 The writer
Nor Aliem 2010-32-135
viii
ABSTRACT Aliem, Nor. 2014. The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Student of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic year 2014-2015 By Using Summarizing Strategy Skripsi.English Education Department.Teacher Training and Education Faculty.Muria Kudus University. Advisor: (I) Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd., (II) Junaidi, S.Pd, M.Pd., Key Words: Summarizing Strategy and Reading Comprehension Reading is an important skill in learning English. In MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara, especially in the eleventh grade, most of them stated that reading is long and boring activity. However the teachers only focused in materials from handbook, the teacher never use any teaching media who supported his teaching and learning process also when he give explanation related to the material he only give brief explanation. This kind of situation makes students have low comprehension in reading comprehension especially on hortatory exposition text. the result of students’s reading comprehension of hortatory exposition text test is still unsatisfactory and many students get low score. In this case the teacher should use appropriate strategy to make the students more interest and understand well. Summarizing Strategy is one of alternative strategy that can be used by the English teacher to teach reading comprehension especially on hortatory exposition text . Hopefully, it can increase the students’ reading comprehension. This research is an experimental research used one group with pre-test and post-test. The population of this research was all of the eleventh grade students of MAMiftahul Huda RaguklampitanBatealit Jepara in academic Year 2014/2015 by using summarizing strategy. The number of sample is 13 students which are taken by cluster randomly from the eleventh grade students. The writer took eleventh grade students as a single class as the sample. Test is used as the instrument of this research. There are pre-test and post-test to get the score and to know the data before and after being taught by using summarizing strategy. From these score can be known wheter there is or no significant different between the reading comprehension of hortatory exposition text ofeleventh grade students of MAMiftahul Huda RaguklampitanBatealit Jepara in academic Year 2014/2015 before and after taught by using summarizing strategy. The result of this research can be seen from the mean of the pre-test is 55.53, standard deviation is 7.21. While the mean of post-test is 75.84, standard deviation is 11.21 Hypothesis testing in the level of significance 0.05 and degree of freedom (df)12, the t-obtained (t0) is – 1.000 and t-table (tt) is 2.179, so the tobtained falls in the critical region. Therefore, the researcher concludes that there is a significant difference betweenthe reading comprehension of hortatory exposition text of eleventh grade students of MAMiftahul Huda ix
RaguklampitanBatealit Jepara in academic Year 2014/2015 before and after by using summarizing strategy. From the facts above, the writer suggests the English teacher to give summarizing strategy in every reading activity inside the classroom or outside the classroom. The writer also suggests students to do reading activity when they are in the school, at home or everywhere. And for the further teacher, the writer suggests to combine this strategy with the other media or method to make more innovations in teaching reading comprehension.
x
ABSTRAKSI Aliem, Nor. 2014. Pemahaman Membaca Teks Hortatory Exposition Kelas Sebelas MA MIftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara Tahu Ajaran 2014-2015Menggunakan Strategi Meringkas Skripsi. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muria Kudus. Dosen Pembimbing: (I) Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd (II) Junaidi, S.Pd, M.Pd., Kata Kunci: Strategi meringkasdan Pemahaman membaca Pemehaman membaca adalah kemampuan yang penting dalam mempelajari bahasa inggris. Di MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara, khususnya di kelas XI, kebanyakan siswa kelas sebelas mengatakan bahwa membaca merupakan kegitan yang panjang dan membosankan yang membuat mereka bosan .Guru hanya fokus pada materi yang ada di buku paket, guru tidak pernah menggunakan beberapa media atau strategy pembelajaran yang mendukung pengajarannya dan proses pembelajaran serta ketika dia memberikan penjelasan mengenai materi dia hanya member penjelasan singkat.situasi seperti ini hanya membuat siswa kurang memahami dalam pemahaman membaca khususnya teks
hortatory exposition. Tetapi Hasil dari tingkat pemahaman membaca teks hortatory exposition text masih kurang memuaskandan banyak siswa yang mendapat nilai rendah. Pada kasus ini guru seharusnya menggunekan strategy yang cocok untuk membuat siswa lebih tertarik dan memahaminya dengan baik. Strategy meringkas merupakan salah satu jalan keluar yang dapat di gunakan oleh guru bahasa inggris untuk mengajar pemahaman membaca khususnya untuk teks hortatory exposition. Harapannya itu dapat meningkatkan pemahaman membaca siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen menggunakan satu kelompok dengan menggunakan tes awal dan tes akhir. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah semua siswa kelas sebelas Ma Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015 dengan menggunakan strategi meringkas. Jumlah sampel 13 siswa yang mana di ambil dengan cara claster random sampling dari kelas sebelas. Penulis mengambil kelas sebelas sebagai kelas tunggal sebagai sampel. Tes digunakan sebagai alat dari penelitian ini. Ada tes awal dan tes akhir untuk menggunaka nilai dan untuk mengetahui data sebelum dan sesudah di ajar menggunakan strategi meringkas. Dari nilai tersebut dapat di ketahui apakah ada perbedaan signifikan terhadap kemampuan membaca teks hortatory exposition text siswa kelas sebelas MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara tahun ajaran 2014/2015 sebelum dan setelah diajar menggunakan strategi meringkas. Hasil dari penelitian dapat dilihat dari nilai rata-rata tes awal adalah 55.53, standar deviasinya dalah 7.21. sementara nilai rata-rata tes akhirnya adalah 75.84, standar deviasinya 11.21 pengujian hipotesis awalnya di level signifikasi 0.05 dan tingkat kebebasan (df) 12, t-obtained (to) -1.000 dan t-table jatuh pada
xi
daerah kritis. Maka penelitian disimpulkan bahwa ada ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara pemahaman membaca membaca teks hortatory eksposisi siswa kelas sebelas MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara tahun ajaran 2014/2015 sebelum dan sesudah di ajar menggunakan strategi meringkas. Dari fakta di atas penulis menyarankan kepada Guru Bahasa Inggris untuk memberikan strategi meringkas pada setiap aktivitas didalam kelas maupun diluar kelas. Penulis juga memberikan saran kepada siswa ketika melakukan aktifitas membaca di dalam kelas, di rumah atau dimana-mana. Dan untuk Guru, penulis menyarankan untuk mengkobinasikan strategi ini dengan media-media yang lain atau metode-metode yang lain untuk membuat inovasi-inovasi dalam pengajaran pemahaman membaca.
xii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover ............................................................................................................. i Logo ............................................................................................................... ii Title ................................................................................................................ iii Advisors’ Approval ...................................................................................... iv Examiners ‘Approval ................................................................................... v Motto and Dedication .................................................................................. vi Acknowledgement ........................................................................................ vii Abstract ......................................................................................................... x Abstraksi ....................................................................................................... xii Table of Contents ......................................................................................... xiii List of Tables ............................................................................................... xvii List of Figures .............................................................................................. xviii List of Appendices ....................................................................................... xx
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1
Background of the Research .................................................................
1
1.2
Statement of the Problem .....................................................................
3
1.3
Objective of the Research .....................................................................
3
1.4
Significance of the Research ................................................................
3
1.5
Scope of the Research...........................................................................
4
1.6
Operational Definition ..........................................................................
4
CHAPTER II REVIEW TO THE RELATED LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESIS 2.1 Teaching English in Senior High School ...............................................
6
2.1.1 Teaching English in MA. Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara..............................................................
7
2.1.2 Material of Teaching English in MA. Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara ..............................................................
7
2.2 Reading Comprehension ........................................................................
8
xiii
2.2.1 Teaching Reading Comprehension .......................................................
10
2.2.2 The Purpose of Reading Comprehension ..............................................
11
2.3 Hortatory Exposition Text......................................................................
13
2.4 Summarizing Strategy ............................................................................
14
2.4.1 The Steps of Summarizing Strategy......................................................
15
2.4.2 The Advantages and the Disadvantages of Summarizing Strategy ......
16
2.5
Previous Research .................................................................................
17
2.6
Theoretical Framework .........................................................................
18
2.7
Hypothesis .............................................................................................
19
CHAPTER III METHOD OF THE RESEARCH 3.1
Research Design ....................................................................................
18
3.2
Population and Sample..........................................................................
20
3.3
Instrument of the Research....................................................................
20
3.4
Technique of Collecting Data ...............................................................
23
3.5
Technique of Analyzing Data ...............................................................
27
CHAPTER IV: FINDING OF THE RESEARCH ....................................
28
4.1
28
Research Finding .................................................................................
4.1.1 The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 Before being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy .......................................................... 4.1.2 The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh grade students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan
xiv
29
Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 After being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ...............................................................
31
Hypothesis Testing ..............................................................................
34
CHAPTER V: FINDING OF THE RESEARCH .....................................
28
5.1
38
4.2
Discussion Finding of The Research ...................................................
5.1.1 The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 Before being Taught by Bsing Summarizing Strategy ………………………………......
38
5.1.2 The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 After being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy………………………………………
40
5.1.3 Significant Difference between The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 Before and After being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ...............................................................................................
43
CHAPTER VI: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ............................
48
6.1
Conclusion ...........................................................................................
48
6.2
Suggestion ...........................................................................................
49
BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................
57
APPENDICES .............................................................................................
58
xv
STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 109 CURRICULUM VITAE ............................................................................. 110
xvi
LIST OF TABLES 3.1 4.1
The Table Clasification of Reading Comprehension ........................... 26 The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 before being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy .......................................................... 29
4.2
Frequensi Distribution of The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh grade students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 before being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ........................ 30
4.3
The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh grade students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 after being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ............................................................... 32
4.4
Frequency Distribution of The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh grade students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 After being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ........ 33
4.5
Summary of the Result Calculation of Mean, Standard Deviation and T-Obtained from Pre-test and Post-test Score ............................. 37
xvii
LIST OF FIGURES 3.1
The Design Experimental Pre – test Post – Test ................................. 19
3.2
Computing Mean ................................................................................ 24
3.3
Computing Standard Deviation .......................................................... 24
3.4
Computing the Test Statistic................................................................ 25
4.1
Bar Diagram of The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh grade students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 before being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ........................ 31
4.2
Bar Diagram of the reading comprehension of hortatory exposition text of the eleventh grade students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in academic year 2014/2015 after being taught by using summarizing strategy ...................................... 34
4.3
Curve of Sampling Distribution of T-Test ......................................... 37
xviii
LIST OF APPENDICES 1.
Syllabus of the Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 ............ 47
2.
Lesson Plan to Teach Speaking to the Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 .................................................................................... 63
3.
The Research Instrument (Try out, Pre-test, and Post-test) ................. 86
4.
Score of Speaking to the Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015 ... 87
5.
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text to the Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015.................................................................... 89
6.
The Key Answer of the Research Instrument (Try Out, Pre-test, and Post-test) ............................................................................................... 94
7.
Content
Validity of
the
Research Instrument
of
Reading
Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text to the Eleventh Grade Students of MA Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara in Academic Year 2014/2015.................................................................... 95 8.
The Calculation of Reliability of the Research Instrument................... 96
9.
The Calculation of the Index of Reliability........................................... 97
10.
Score of The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of
The
Eleventh
Grade
Students of
xix
Ma
Miftahul
Huda
Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 Before being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ..................................... 99 11.
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation Pre-test and Post test Score of The Eleventh Grade Students of Ma Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 Before being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ..................................... 100
12.
Score of The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of
The
Eleventh
Grade
Students of
Ma
Miftahul
Huda
Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 After being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ..................................... 101
13.
Calculation of Mean And Standard Deviation of Pre-Test And PostTest Score of The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Students of Ma Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 After Taught by Using Summarizing Srategy ................................................ 102
14.
Table of The Differences of The Pre-Test And Post-Test Score of The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text of The Eleventh Grade Students of Ma Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 Before And After being Taught by Using Summarizing Strategy ..................................... 103
15.
The Calculation of T-Testof The Reading Comprehension of Hortatory Exposition Text Of The Eleventh Grade Students of Ma
xx
Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 Taught by Using Summarizing Srategy .............................. 104 16.
List of Students of Eleventh Grade Students of Ma Miftahul Huda Raguklampitan Batealit Jepara In Academic Year 2014/2015 ............. 105
xxi
