BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN
A.
Kesimpulan Dari hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa,
penerapan strategi anomali data dapat meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan mengubah miskonsepsi siswa. Perubahan persentase miskonsepsi siswa terhadap konsep cahaya pada kelas ekperimen mengalami penurunan dari 27,34% menjadi 12,85%, sebaliknya pada kelas kontrol terjadi penambahan persentase miskonsepsi dari 24,66% menjadi 27,29%. Adapun peningkatan pemahaman konsep siswa pada kelas eksperimen dengan menggunakan penerapan pembelajaran konstruktivisme melalui anomali data memperoleh skor N-Gain sebesar 0,40 sedangkan pada kelas kontrol hanya mendapatkan skor N-Gain 0,15. Dengan demikian, penerapan pembelajaran miskonsepsi melalui anomali data selain dapat mengubah miskonsepsi juga dapat meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa tentang cahaya.
B.
Saran-saran Dari temuan penelitian terhadap peningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan
perubahan miskonsepsi siswa yang didasarkan pada pembahasan bab sebelumnya, maka disarankan dalam pembelajaran materi cahaya di sekolah dasar terdapat beberapa hal berikut yang perlu dipertimbangkan: Pertama 88
89
Untuk menghindari miskonsepsi pada pembelajaran sebaiknya guru memahami bahwa pembelajaran sains harus didasarkan pada pengetahuan awal siswa; kedua untuk menerapkan pembelajaran konstruktivisme melalui anomali data, seorang guru membutuhkan keterampilan
membuat pertanyaan
yang
merangsang rasa ingin tahu anak; ketiga seorang guru sebaiknya harus memiliki keterampilan untuk menciptakan konflik kognitif; keempat penerapan pembelajaran konstruktivisme melalui anomali data selain memerlukan keterampilan metodologi, juga membutuhkan keterampilan mendalami makna konstruktivis.
90
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Akdon. (2008). Aplikasi Statistika dan Metode Penelitian untuk Administrasi dan Manajemen. Bandung: Dewa Ruchi.
Anderson, B., et.al. (2003). Discussing a Rationale for the Design of Teaching Sequences: Geometrical optics as example, Meeting of the Eropean Science Education Research Association, Noordwijkerhout, NL. Anderson, W. Charles & Smith, L. Edward (1983). Transparances on Light: Teachers Manual, The Institute for Research on Teaching 252 Eriction Hall: Michigan State University. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1992). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Asterhan, Christa, S., C. (2007). Processing of Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Results from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialoge, School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. Ausubel, D.P. (1968) Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, inc. Azyzodlu, N. (2004). Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction And Students Misconception Gases. Thesis Middle East Technical University. Baser, M. (2006). Fostering Conceptual Change By Cognitive Conflict Based Instruction on Students’ Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Volume. Bertamini, M., et.al. (2004). The representation of naïve knowledge about physics, Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. Bilal, E., Erol, M. (2009). Investigation Students’ Conception of Some Electricity Concept, Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. Vol. 3, Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey Bozkoyun, Y.(2004). Facilitating Conceptual Change Learning Rate of Reaction Concept. Thesis Middle East Technical University. Brewer , J. (2007). Introduction to Early Chilhood Education Preschool through Primary Grade, six edition. New York: Alyn and Bacon. Brewer, F., William & Chin, Clark. A (1993). The Role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoritical framework and implications for science instruction, Review of Educational Reseaech, vol. 63.
91
Bidewell, W and Buchanan, B.G (2005). Extracting Plausible Explanation of Anomalous Data, Article: Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburg. Bulunuz, N. (2006). Understanding of Earth and Space Science Concept: Strategies for Concept Building in Elementary Teacher Preparation, a Desertation, Early Childhood Education, College of Education Georgia State University. Cansu, K & Hulusi, C. (2008). Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Science: A Case of Turkey, World Applied Science Journal: IDOSI, Turkey Chen, C., C., et. al. (2002). Developing a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument to Assess High School Students’ Understanding-The Formation of Images by a Plane Mirror, Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D), Taiwan, Vol. 12 Chiu, Mei-Hung (2007). Research and InstructioN-Based/Oriented Work (RAINBOW) for Conceptual Change in Science Learning, Proceeding of the second NICE Symposium: Taipei, Taiwan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2004). Panduan Penyusunan KTSP Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar. Jakarta: BSNP. Driver, R & Oldham, V. (1986). A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science, in Studies in Science Education. vol 13. Gega, P.C. (1994). Concepts and Experiments in Elementary School Science. New York: Mackmillan Publishing Company. Govindarajan, G & Wright, E.L (1995). Discrepant Event Demonstrations: Motivating students to learn science concept, Emporia State University, Emporia, KS Hardy, I, et. al. (2006). Effect of Instructional Support Within Constructivist Learning Environment for Elementary School Students’ Understanding of “Floating and Sinking”, Journal of Educational Psychology: American Psychological Association. Hernandez, C. S., Buzzo, R. G., Rivera, R. C. (2008). Measurement of the conceptual chane produced in pre-school and elementary teachers based on MECIBA training methodology, Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. Vol.2, Brazil. Hewson, P.W. (1992). Conceptual Change in Science teaching and Teacher Education, National Centre for Educational Research, Documentation and Assessment: Madrid Ipek, H and Calik, M (2008). Combining Different Conceptual Change Methods within Four Step Constructivist Teaching Model: A Sample Teaching of Series and Parallel Circuits, International Journal of Environmental of Sceince Education: Turkey
92
Irene-Anna, et. al. (2002). Reading about Energy: The Effect of Text Structure in Science Learning and Conceptual Change, The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA) Jaccab, C. (1997). Exploring Science Elementary Together, Melbourne Australia: Heinenment Kwon, et. All (1999). The Development of an Instrument for Measuring Students’ Cognitive Conflict Levels, Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching: Boston Kurnaedi (2000). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Madrasah Aliyah pada Pembelajaran Pembentukan Bayangan oleh Cermin Datar, Cembung, dan Cekung, Tesis, UPI, Bandung Kutluay, Y. (2005), Diagnosis of Eleventh Grade Students’ Misconception about Geometric Optic by a Three-Tier Test, Thesis Middle East Technical University. Lee, M (2007). Is Using Discrepant Evevnt an Effective Teaching Strategy to Promote Conceptual Change, Callifornia State University, Nortridge. Lie, S., et. al. (1996). Scoring Techniques and Criteria, Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Technical Report, Volum I: Design and Development, Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. Liew, C. W. (2004). The effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Technique in Diagnosing Students’ Understanding of Science and Identifying Their Level of Achievement. Thesis Curtin University of Technology. Longfield, J. (2001). Discrepant Teaching Events: Using an Inquiry Science to Adress Students’ Misconceptions, International Journal of Teaching and Learning: Indiana University Northwest Marlina, L. (2001). Mengajar Sains berdasarkan Pandangan Konstruktivisme. Deakin University, Burwood Vic.: tidak dipublikasikan. Meltzer, David E. (2002) “The Relationship between Mathematic Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gain in Physics. ‘hiden Variable’ in Diagnostic Pretest Scores” American Journal of Physics. Novak, J.D. (1981). Effective Science instruction: The achievement of shared meaning, The Australian Science Teachers Journal, vol. 27. Otero, Valerie, K and Nathan, Mitchell, J. (2003). Elementary Pre Teachers’ Initial and Changing Views about Students’ Prior Knowledge and Collaborative Learning, American Educational Research Association: Chicago, Illionis Panomporn, P. (2004). The effectiveness of Constructivist Teaching on Improving Learning Environments in Thai Secondary School Science Classroom. Thesis Curtin University of Technology Melbourne Australia: unpublisher paper
93
Park, J., Kim, I. (1995). Analysis of students’ responses to contradictory results obtained by simple observation or controlling variables, College of Education, Chonnan National University: Kwangju Korea Pidarta, M. (1990). Perencanaan Pendidikan Partisipatori dengan Pendekatan Sistem, Rhineka Cipta: Jakarta Sandoval, A. William (2001). Students’ uses of data as evidence in scientific explanations, Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association Seattle, WA. Sartain, A. Q, et. al (1973). Psychology (Understanding Human Behaviour), Mc. Graw-Hill: Kogakusha, Tokyo Scott, P.H., Asoko, H.M., Driver, R.H. (1991). Teaching For Conceptual Change: A Riview Of Strategies, Proceeding the an International Workshop
Semith, J. P, diSesa, A.A, dan Roschelle, J (2003). Misconception Received: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition, Sugiyono. (2001). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta. Suparno, S.J. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Suryadinata. N.S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Tan, D., et. al. (2005). Development of A Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Instrumen to Determine A-Level Students’ Understanding of Ionisation Energy, Thesis, National Institute of Education Keith S. Taber, University of Cambridge Trickett, S.B, et. al. (2003). That’s’ Odd! How Scientists Respond to Anomalous Data, Article, Departmen of Psychology, George Mason University: VA, USA Tytler, R. (2000). Constructivism and Conceptual change approaches to Learning in in Science. Deakin University, Geelong, Vic.: unpublisher paper. Weller, H. (2007) Misconceptions (“Alternative Conception”) in Science Teaching, EDW 472/SMS, 491 Spring. Weller, H (2007) What is a Discrepant Event in Teaching, EDW 471/SMS, Spring. West, Leo., H.T., Pines, Leon. (1985). Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, Department of Psychology, South West Missoury, State University. White, R & Tytler, R (1997). Conceptual Change in Science: Towards a teory of content, Reader, Deakin University. Widodo, A. (2004). Constructivist Oriented Lesson. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Gmbh
94
Wilantara, I. P. E. (2003). Implementasi Model Belajar Konstruktivist dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Mengubah Miskonsepsi ditinjau dari Penalaran Formal Siswa, , Thesis, IKIP Singaraja, Bali, 2003
Wuryastuti, S. (1997). Pembelajaran Topik Gaya di Kelas V SD untuk mengubah Konsepsi Awal Siswa, Thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Bandung
95