National Report on
Qualifications and Existing training procedures of professionals in Solid Waste Management Industry in Hungary Marta Szabo, PhD, habil. associate professor Szent Istvan University
1
Content 1
Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1
Brief overview of the report.......................................................................................................... 4
1.2
Information about distribution of questionnaires ........................................................................ 4
1.3
Brief description of other information sources............................................................................. 4
PART 1. .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Qualifications of professionals in Solid Waste Management Industry in HUNGARY .................................... 6 2
Description of the existing National Qualification Network ................................................................. 6 2.1
3
Quality Assurance.......................................................................................................................... 6
Training programmes and the national legislation ............................................................................... 7 3.1
Description of the VET System in Hungary.................................................................................... 7
3.1.1
IVET........................................................................................................................................ 8
3.1.2
CVET....................................................................................................................................... 9
3.1.3
vocational education ............................................................................................................. 9
3.1.4
post-secondary non-tertiary education ..............................................................................10
3.1.5
continuing vocational education and training ....................................................................11
3.2
The curriculum and the outcome requirement of VET ...............................................................12
3.3
qualification – képesítés (qualification) ......................................................................................12
3.4
The legislative and institutional framework and implementation level for IVET .......................14
3.4.1
Legislative framework for IVET............................................................................................14
3.4.2
Institutional framework: IVET .............................................................................................15
3.4.3
Implementation level ..........................................................................................................16
3.5
The legislative and institutional framework and implementation level for CVET ......................17
3.5.1
Legislative framework for CVET ..........................................................................................17
3.5.2
Institutional framework: CVET ............................................................................................18
3.5.3
Implementation level ..........................................................................................................18
3.6
Vocational Education and training at tertiary level ....................................................................18 2
3.6.1 4
Higher level vocational education and training ..................................................................19
Status of the industrial waste management labour market ...............................................................20 4.1
Overview of waste management industry in the country ..........................................................20
4.2
waste management and remediation .........................................................................................20
4.3
Economics of waste management in Hungary ............................................................................21
5
Survey results ......................................................................................................................................23 5.1
Working conditions .....................................................................................................................24
5.2
Knowledge related information ..................................................................................................25
5.3
Interest/ willingness of SWF professionals to attend VET ..........................................................29
6
Annexes PART 1 ...................................................................................................................................30 6.1
Example of questionnaire ...........................................................................................................30
6.2
List of waste management facilities and authorities taking part in the survey ..........................34
PART 2 .........................................................................................................................................................36 7
Training structure ................................................................................................................................36
8
Training contents.................................................................................................................................36
9
Learning outcomes and acquired knowledge .....................................................................................37
10
Evaluation of quality of existing training programs available in Hungary ......................................38
11
Interest/ willingness of SWF professionals to attend VET ..............................................................38
12 Main problems/ obstacles related to vocational training for waste management facilities’ managers .....................................................................................................................................................39 13
Cost and possible source of financing .............................................................................................40
14
Conclusions .....................................................................................................................................40
15
Annexes PART 2 ...............................................................................................................................41
15.1
Example of questionnaire ...........................................................................................................41
15.2
List of high level training institutions ..........................................................................................45
16
References .......................................................................................................................................49
17
List of figures ...................................................................................................................................49
3
1 Introduction 1.1 Brief overview of the report The report is about the qualification level and qualification trainings on solid waste facility management in Hungary. It summarizes the results from the surveys among facility managers, professionals authorities and institutions providing training in this field. The report consists of two main parts. The part 1. Is about the qualification of professionals in the solid waste management industry, the second is on the existing training procedures of professinals in the solid waste management industry. The first part gives an overiew on the descriptions and informations about the questionnares and the methodology of the survey, a short description about the national Qualification Network System and training system, status of the waste management industry in Hungary, and the labour market especially related to the question of qualification. Th second part shows the results form the national survey related to the training procedures, structures, contents and outcomes.
1.2 Information about distribution of questionnaires All together more than 200 questionnaires have been distributed via e-mails and on meetings, and in some cases by telephone interviews. The collected number is 82 for the time being. (total: for waste management facilities, organisations and authorities and for training institutions) the distribution is 60 5- 17. The main interested and active respondents were representing the facilities and the less interested were – and as such the less numbers could be collected – were at the authorities.
1.3 Brief description of other information sources Other information sources are from the Hungarian Central Statistical Office, from the CEDEFOP, from the National Institute of Vocational and Adult Education, Ministry of National Resources. The Hungarian Central Statistical Office is a professionally independent public administration agency under tha government. Main tasks of the HCSO: Designing and conducting surveys, recording, proccessing and storing data, data analyses- and dissemination, protection of individual data. The Office provides data for the parliament and public administration, social organizations, local authorities, scientific bodies, economic organizations, the general public and the media as well as for international organizations and users abroad. Official data regarding the socio-economic situation as well as the changes in the population of the country are published by the HCSO. Cedefop, (the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) founded (1) in 1975 and based in Greece since 1995, supports development of European vocational education and training (VET) policies and contributes to their implementation. Cedefop works to strengthen European cooperation and provide the evidence on which to base European VET policy. Cedefop’s added value is the high quality of its comparative analyses and expertise gathered through research and networking, which are used to: •
Provide technical advice and propose ideas for VET policies; 4
•
Fill knowledge gaps and generating new insights that identify trends in and challenges for VET
•
Increase awareness of VET’s image and importance;
•
Bring together policy-makers, social partners, researchers and practitioners to share ideas and debate the best ways to improve VET policies;
•
Support and encourage joint European approaches, principles and tools to improve VET.
Cedefop works closely with the European Commission, Member States’ governments, representatives of employers and trade unions, VET researchers and practitioners. It provides them with up-to-date information on developments in VET as well as opportunities for policy debate.
5
PART 1. Qualifications of professionals in Solid Waste Management Industry in HUNGARY Marta Szabo, PhD, habil. associate professor
2 Description of the existing National Qualification Network1 For the description of the National Qualification Network and the VET system in Hungary this report used and cited the information as it is available in the sources: http://www.eqavet.eu/gns/what-we-do/implementing-the-framework/hungary.aspx
Source: VET in Hungary ReferNet Country Report 2009 http://www.observatory.org.hu/wpcontent/uploads/TO7_eng.pdf The conception of NQF has been elaborated in the course of an extensive professional consultation process. The Government decree on the development of a National Qualifications Framework (NQF) has been issued in 2008. Pursuant to it the NQF must be compatible with the European Qualifications Framework System (EQF), and unitarily introduced from 2013. The related developments are financed and organized in the frames of TÁMOP programme. The technical and professional work related to the elaboration of NQF takes place in the professional workshops of the background institutes of the ministries responsible for public education and VET, such as the Institute for Educational Research and Development(Oktatáskutató és Fejleszto Intézet (OFI) and National Institute of Vocational and Adult Education (Nemzeti Szakképzési és Felnottképzési Intézet, NSZFI), respectively. The proposal with respect to the legal, policy and budget conditions of joining EQF was to be expected in 2010, thus the possible impacts of a NQF on VET will become visible only in the course of the preparatory process. Stakeholders nevertheless consider the development process of NQF as a tool which may enhance the acceleration and harmonization of the internal reforms being implemented within the different areas of education and training.
2.1 Quality Assurance2 The governmental resolution on the implementation of the 2005 Strategy of VET development schedules the introduction of a career monitoring system in vocational and adult training by December 2008. At the end of 2007 a large scale development programme was launched within a focal project of the Social Renewal Operational Programme (SROP) the aim was to create a national integrated system of guidance (career building) and to improve the quality of vocational and adult training as a whole and
1
Cited from http://www.eqavet.eu/gns/what-we-do/implementing-the-framework/hungary.aspx
2
Cited from http://www.eqavet.eu/gns/what-we-do/implementing-the-framework/hungary.aspx
6
also affect all the levels and most participants of VET. The establishment of a national career guidance system by the middle of 2009, to be built on online and traditional tools, developing current and newly established career counseling, guidance and monitoring systems and linking them to the labour market information systems, which can be connected into the EU-27 systems (EQF, EUROPASS, PLOTEUS, EURES, EuroGuidanceNetwork, etc.) is coordinated by the Employment and Social Office of the Public Employment Service. Within the Office, a Hungarian Lifelong Learning Career Guidance Policy Council was set up in early 2008 . At national level the Adult Training Accreditation Body (Felnôttképzési Akkreditáló Testület, FAT) performs tasks related to institution and programme accreditation and quality assurance in adult training .
Source: VET in Hungary ReferNet Country Report 2009 http://www.observatory.org.hu/wpcontent/uploads/TO7_eng.pdf In addition to the quality assurance mechanisms developed within the framework of International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and within various state programmes a vocational school selfassessment model (Szakiskolai Önértékelési Modell, SZÖM) has been currently developed in 120 vocational schools in SZFP based on Common Quality Assurance Framework (CQAF). In 2006 he VET Quality Assurance Framework (Szakképzési Minoségbiztosítási Keretrendszer, SZMBK) was elaborated as a national adaptation of the CQAF and launched into the area of VET. The biggest obstacle to introducing the system in its entirety is the lack of professional and material help. Hence one of the TÁMOP 2.2.1 sub-projects assigns 353 million HUF (nearly 1, 4 million EUR) for the development of a unitary quality assurance system that can be used by every VET schools. It is developed on the basis of previously applied systems such as SZMBK and SZÖM.3
3 Training programmes and the national legislation 3.1 Description of the VET System in Hungary4 In Hungary VET is under the supervision of the Minister of Social Affairs and Labour (Szociális és Munkaügyi Miniszter, SZMM). SZMM is in charge of the content regulation of VET but issues relevant decrees with the assent of the Minister of Education and Culture (Oktatási és Kulturális Miniszter, OKM). Other ministers are also involved in the development of the content of VET. The National Institute of Vocational and Adult Education (Nemzeti Szakképzési és Felnőttképzési Intézet, NSZFI) assists the SZMM in its development, coordination, research, information and counselling tasks related to VET and adult training , .
3
Cited from: VET in Hungary ReferNet Country Report 2009 http://www.observatory.org.hu/wpcontent/uploads/TO7_eng.pdf 4
Cited from http://www.eqavet.eu/gns/what-we-do/implementing-the-framework/hungary.aspx
7
County governments´ and local municipalities´ main role is to maintain public schools, including VET schools. As school maintainers, these bodies have to develop a quality management programme defining their expectations towards its schools and their inspection activities. Further organizations with a significant role in VET administration include: • •
•
•
•
National Interest Reconciliation Council (Országos Érdekegyeztető Tanács, OÉT), serving as a forum for interest reconciliation regarding strategic questions of VET (national level); Adult Training Accreditation Body (Felnőttképzési Akkreditáló Testület, FAT) performs tasks related to institution and programme accreditation and quality assurance in adult training (national level); Seven regional development and training committees (regionális fejlesztési és képzési bizottságok, RFKBs), operated by the Education Office, play an increasingly important role in VET administration (preparation of regional VET strategies, ensure the link between school-based VET and labour market demands, etc.) (regional level); Regional integrated vocational training centres (térségi integrált szakképző központ, TISZK) have been funded to get access to structural funds. These concentrations have been encouraged by the central administration due to the high number VET providers. Such formations can be funded by school maintainers, practical VET providers and higher education institutions (local level); Non-governmental organizations, such as the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Magyar Kereskedelmi és Iparkamara, MKIK) and the Hungarian Chamber of Agriculture (Magyar Agrárkamara, MA) play a major role in the development of the professional and examination requirements of OKJ qualifications, the organization of vocational examinations, quality assurance functions related to school-based IVET (monitoring apprenticeship and other forms of practical training), etc.
In Hungary the provision of VET is governed by Act LXXVI of 1993 on Vocational education and training. All state recognized vocational qualifications obtainable within or outside the school system are defined in the National Qualification Register (Országos Képzési Jegyzék, OKJ) providing a unified qualification system linking IVET and CVET. Both IVET and CVET are provided in three sub-sectors of education: public education, higher education and adult training.
3.1.1 IVET There are two types of VET schools (szakképző iskola) in Hungary: vocational schools (szakiskola) and secondary vocational schools (szakközépiskola). Both types of schools are part of the public education system. Although students enter these schools at the age of 14, since according to the new regulation VET can only start at the age of 16, in the first two years in vocational schools and in the first four years in secondary vocational schools general education is provided which is then followed by VET. In addition, a new form of IVET was recently introduced, the higher level vocational education and training (felsőfokú szakképzés) introduced in 1998. This non-degree tertiary-level training is provided in by higher educational institutions and also by secondary vocational schools. Students enrolled in such training must have obtained the secondary school leaving certificate (érettségi) in secondary vocational schools or grammar schools (gimnázium), and these typically 4-term-long programmes provide VET to students older than the age of 18 to obtain an ISCED 5B level OKJ qualification. Higher education degree programmes are provided in colleges (főiskola) and universities (egyetem). These award a tertiary level graduation certificate and qualification (szakképzettség). The entry requirement here is the secondary school leaving certificate 8
Although some OKJ vocational qualifications are available only within the formal school system (in the new OKJ introduced in 2006, only those offered in higher level VET), Since most OKJ vocational qualifications are obtainable also within the framework of adult training (felnőttképzés), such VET programmes may be considered as IVET in case the participant has not earned a vocational qualification in public or higher education. VET school maintainers include local (county and municipal) governments, state agencies, churches, foundations, etc. In higher education, the maintainer (the state, churches, foundations, etc.) supervises the operation and effectiveness of the professional work of colleges/universities, which otherwise enjoy wide-ranging autonomy in both administrative and pedagogical matters.
3.1.2 CVET Adult education within the school system is provided by public and higher education institutions at primary, secondary and tertiary levels. Such education is offered for adults who have not obtained any graduation certificate within the formal school system, or an OKJ qualification, or desire to have a higher level or more specialized qualification. Adult training outside the school system is provided by the 9 regional training centers (regionális képző központ) of the Public Employment Service, private training companies, non-profit organizations, employers, public and higher education institutions, etc. The Adult training act of 2001 distinguishes vocational, general and language training within adult training. A further training is also provided by the economic chambers, called master examinations (mestervizsga) granting a higher level qualification based on the OKJ qualification obtained in IVET. Disfavored social groups including disadvantaged individuals in the labour market and unemployed are provided with free participation in adult training.
3.1.3 vocational education vocational education – szakképzés (vocational training – this is the unambigous Hungarian equivalent of vocational education and training), szakoktatás(vocational education), szakmai képzés(vocational training) Vocational education and training is used as a generic term covering many different types of education and training opportunities with the common objective of leading participants to acquire, develop or refresh the practical skills, know-how and understanding necessary for employment in a particular occupation or trade or class of occupations or trades. Therefore, it is understood a bit more broadly than the UNESCO and ISCED definitions and it is used also to refer to such programmes that do not lead to a labour-market relevant vocational qualification recognized by the competent authorities. The provision of all forms of VET – with the exception of ISCED 5A and 6 level higher education programmes and so-called ‘training regulated by public authorities’ (see section 5.2.2.) – is regulated by Act LXXVI of 1993 on Vocational Education and Training which distinguishes the following types of VET which may be provided either within or outside the formal school system (see below under ‘IVET’): a. pre-vocational education that makes the foundation of VET; b. programmes awarding a state-recognized vocational qualification; c. programmes awarding a qualification required for getting employment in a specific post, pursuing a profession or performing some activities; d. programmes awarding a higher level vocational qualification (felsofokú szakképesítés) in a higher education institution; 9
e. programmes preparing participants for higher level vocational performance, for the master examination f.
(f) programmes targeting disadvantaged social groups;
g. (g) rehabilitation training provided to people with changed working ability; and h. (h) programmes assisting finding employment or starting a business. School-based VET programmes award a state-recognized vocational qualification listed in the National Qualifications Register (Országos Képzési Jegyzék, OKJ), but all these OKJ qualifications can also be obtained in adult training, with the exception of ISCED 5B higher level vocational qualifications (while some OKJ qualifications are available only in adult training).
3.1.4 post-secondary non-tertiary education post-secondary non-tertiary education – érettségi utáni szakképzés (VET provided following the Secondary School Leaving Exam) or posztszekunder, nem felsofokú képzés (post-secondary non-tertiary training) Post-secondary non-tertiary education has been offered in the VET years of secondary vocational schools since the second half of the 1990s when the structure of VET schools was substantially transformed so that general education was extended until year 10 in vocational schools and year 12 or 13 at secondary vocational schools, thus moving the vocational training programmes of the latter from ISCED 3 to ISCED 4 level. Currently students enter the VET years of secondary vocational schools at the age of 18 at the earliest, typically after having obtained the Secondary School Leaving Certificate (érettségi bizonyítvány, ISCED 3A). The duration of the vocational training programme depends on the OKJ qualification awarded and is defined in its professional and examination requirements (szakmai és vizsgakövetelmények, SZVK); typically the training is two years long (which, however, is often reduced to one year, when participation in pre-vocational education in secondary vocational school is recognized), but programmes of 2, 3, 5 and 6 terms also exist. In Hungary, an ultimate differentiation is made between VET provided within the formal school system (iskolarendszeru szakképzés) and VET provided outside the school system (iskolarendszeren kívüli szakképzés), within the framework of adult training (felnottképzés). IVET is commonly identified with VET provided within the school system, offered in two types of VET schools in the system of public education (közoktatás) and in higher education (ISCED 5B higher level VET programmes – Hungarian legislation does not classify ISCED 5A and 6 level programmes as VET), although together with the higher education degree they also award a ’vocational qualification’ (szakképzettség) which entitles one to enter a job specified in the training and outcome requirements (képzési és kimeneti követelmények) of the programme, see also under ’qualifiation’. While in secondary vocational schools vocational training awarding an OKJ qualification is undertaken after full-time compulsory education (in the VET years at post-secondary non-tertiary level, see above), vocational schools prepare students for obtaining an OKJ qualification in the course of their compulsory schooling (in years 10-12/13). The practical training part of vocational programmes can be provided by the school as well as by an enterprise, but there are no separate pathways of IVET depending on the practical training venue (see below under ‘school-based programmes’).
10
3.1.5 continuing vocational education and training continuing vocational education and training – szakmai továbbképzés (continuing vocational training) If IVET is commonly equated with VET provided within the formal school system (see above), CVET can for the most part be identified with adult training, although various CVET opportunities are also available to adults in higher education and as adult education in public education. The sector of adult training covers many different types and forms of learning opportunities, ranging from training programmes awarding a state-recognized qualification listed in the OKJ to much less structured learning activities offered by community cultural centres or non-profit organizations in folk arts and crafts, popular science, etc. Participation in CVET can be mandatory prescribed by legislation, or initiated and financed by the individual and/or his/her employer, or for the unemployed and other target groups by the state. school-based programmes – there is no official/uniformly used Hungarian equivalent (because it is not a separate pathway, see the definition), though it can be translated as ‘iskolában folyó szakképzés’ (VET provided in the school). Pursuant to the VET Act, in VET within the formal school system vocational theoretical education can be provided only in a VET school (or in the case of higher level VET, in a higher education institution), while the practical training of students can be organized at any ‘practical training place’ (gyakorlóhely) maintained/operated by either a VET school, a legal entity, an economic organization or an individual enterpreneur “where the preconditions of preparing students for the practical requirements prescribed by legislation are ensured”. A ‘central training place’ of a Regional Integrated Vocational Training Centre (térségi integrált szakképzo központ, TISZK can also participate in practical training provision, on the basis of an agreement with the practical training provider. Current education policy in fact – especially in vocational school training offered in blue-collar vocations – aims to encourage students, schools and enterprises alike to organise practical vocational training in such a way that its first phase, focusing on mastering basic vocational skills, should be provided in a workshop setting (typically a school workshop). This should preferably be followed by training at a real workplace in the final vocational year to provide specialised vocational skills and competences, preferably on the basis of a student contract (see below under ‘apprenticeship’). As regards current practice, the majority of secondary vocational school students receive their practical training exclusively at the school, while the practical training of the majority of vocational school students is organized - at least in part - outside the school (typically in apprenticeship training). Therefore, school-based programmes, alternance training and apprenticeships are not in fact separate pathways in the system of IVET in Hungary, and the structure and content requirements of VET and the awarded qualifications are the same irrespective of where the student receives his/her practical training. It is rather one form of delivery for the practical training aspect - in whole or in part - of a vocational training programme provided within the school system, available at: a. upper secondary level in the VET years of vocational schools (szakiskola) b. (b) post secondary level in the VET years of secondary vocational schools (szakközépiskola, and c. (c) (since January 2006) at tertiary level in higher level VET programmes (felsofokú szakképzés). 11
3.2 The curriculum and the outcome requirement of VET The school’s local curriculum termed ‘vocational programme’ (szakmai program) is developed by school based on the SZVKs of the awarded OKJ qualification and the guidelines of central curricula (központi program), both types of documents being published by the minister of the relevant field (more specifically, by one of ten responsible ministries and/or the President of the Central Statistical Office and the President of the Council of Public Procurements); in the case of higher level VET and of OKJ courses offered in adult training, curricula (called ‘VET programme’, szakképzési program, and ‘training programme’, képzési program) are developed by the training provider based on the SZVKs only; in higher level VET, the curriculum called ’VET programme’ (szakképzési program) is developed by the training provider higher education institutions (also for the cooperating secondary vocational schools that provide training), based on the SZVK, taking into account the recommended training programme published by the minister of the relevant field; in higher education the curricula of BA/BSc and MA/MSc programmes are developed by the higher education institutions based on the so-called ‘training and outcome requirements’ (képzési és kimeneti követelmények) of the given programme issued in a decree of the minister of education; the curricula of postgraduate specialization programmes and doctoral training are freely developed by the higher education institution.
3.3 qualification – képesítés (qualification) Although there is no national legal/official definition of the term, it is used uniformly with a meaning that corresponds to the European Qualificatons Framework (EQF) definition: “A formal outcome of an assessment and validation process which is obtained when a competent body determines that an individual has achieved learning outcomes to given standards”. Annex III of Strategy for the enhancement of lifelong learning (2005) defines the term ‘vocational qualification’ (szakképzettség, szakképesítés) as follows: •
The sum of all requirements that an individual needs to meet in order to be able to work in a certain vocation, profession, and to progress in it.
•
An official certification (diploma, certificate) of the successful completion of an educational or training course or passing an exam or test.
The law differentiates between two kinds of vocational qualification depending on type of education and training: •
a vocational qualification obtainable in VET either within or outside the formal school system (szakképesítés), including those listed in the OKJ (available at ISCED 2-6 levels); and
•
an ISCED 5A level qualification (szakképzettség) obtainable in higher education together with a certain level of degree (végzettség; or alone, in a postgraduate specialization programme). 12
In line with the strategy the government decree 2212/2005. (X. 13.) defined the tasks to be completed until 2013, the respective deadlines and those responsible for implementation. One part of the tasks delineated in the decree has been carried out within the framework of the Human Resource Operative Programme (Humáneroforrás-fejlesztési Operatív Program, HEFOP) of NFT (e.g. the renewal of the national qualification register, the institutional concentration) - with some delay with regard to the initial plans. The implementation of other part is under course (e.g. the support of vocational guidance and the development work for preventing dropout within the framework of SZFP). In the case of some tasks no steps have been taken yet, but will be realized within the framework of the New Hungary Development Programme (Új Magyarország Fejlesztési Terv, ÚMFT) that started in 2007. The main objective of the 2005 VET development strategy was the efficient utilization of sources and capacities. One of the recent changes with the biggest impact in VET relates to this objective: the introduction of measures resulting in the large scale concentration in a relatively short time of VET institutions into Regional Integrated Vocational Centres (térségi integrált szakképzo központ, TISZK). As early as 2005 within the framework of HEFOP TISZKs were established with the aim to function as modern, flexible and fully utilized centres of vocational practice and training. Pursuant to a 2007 legal amendment, from 2009 development subsidies will only be available to the maintainers of TISZKs with at least 1500 full-time VET students (see section 9.1). The legal regaulation permits a variety of possible legal forms for TISZKs (including VET organisation partnership of school maintainer local government, non-profit enterprise, VET organisation company, merging of schools into one institution, etc.), which can be created on a voluntary basis by school maintainers, possibly together with practical training provider enterprises and higher education institutions providing higher level VET programmes. The TISZKs can maintain VET schools and can also engage in adult training, and they define the number of classes in the VET years of schools maintained by them or their members and have the right to give consent to the schools' VET curricula. By 2009 77 such centres have been formed involving the earlier - as many as 1000 - VET institutions. The National Qualifications Register (Országos Képzési Jegyzék, OKJ) involving the state recognized vocational qualifications has brought the most important changes with respect to the content of the VET. The main objectives of the programme were to strengthen links between education and training and the economy and to promote lifelong learning by adjusting the OKJ and VET outcome requirements to labour market demands and introducing a modular structure for qualifications, focusing on the development of professional and other (methodological, social and personal) competences. The new OKJ published by the 1/2006. (II.17.) Decree of the Minister of Education decreased the number of vocational qualifications from 804 to 416, and introduced a VET system in which participants may receive a complete qualification upon the completion of a predefined group of training modules within or outside the school system, and which also facilitates lifelong learning through defining partial and specialised 'build-on' qualifications as well. The training based on the new OKJ had to be started from 1 January 2007 in adult training, and at the latest in the 2008/2009 school year, following to the publication of the central programmes, within 13
school based VET. The elaboration and the publication of the professional and examination requirements (szakmai és vizsgakövetelmények, SZVK) based on the new OKJ took place in 2006-2008, which was followed by the development of framework curricula. Modular level content development is taking place in the near future as well as a large scale IT development aiming at the on-line availability of learning materials of modules
3.4 The legislative and institutional framework and implementation level for IVET 3.4.1 Legislative framework for IVET The provision of any type of VET – except for higher education ISCED 5A and 6 level programmes and socalled ‘trainings regulated by public authorities’ (hatósági jellegu képzés) available in adult training - is regulated by Act LXXVI of 1993 on Vocational Education and Training. Its provisions apply to both IVET and CVET, and irrespective of whether the training is provided within or outside the formal school system (i.e., in public/higher education or in adult training). This law defines: (a) the training providers of VET; (b) the content requirements of the National Qualifications Register (Országos Képzési Jegyzék, OKJ) which – published in ministerial Decrees – lists all state-recognised vocational qualifications at each available level; (c) the administrative structure of VET with the tasks of each of the concerned ministries, public authorities, agencies and consultative bodies; (d) the content requirements of the professional and examination requirements (szakmai és vizsgakövetelmények, SZVK) of OKJ qualifications and the general rules concerning the vocational examination; (e)the special regulations concerning the provision of school-based VET (vocational theoretical and practical training, apprenticeships, study breaks and student allowances); and (f)the financing of VET. Another significant law concerning both IVET and CVET is Act LXXXVI of 2003 on the Vocational Training Contribution and Support for the Development of Training which regulates the conditions of the payment and the possible uses of this ‘VET tax’ paid by enterprises and the allocation of resources available for development from the training sub-fund of the Labour Market Fund (Munkaero-piaci Alap, MPA). The operation, administration, and financing of institutions providing IVET within public and higher education are regulated by Act LXXIX of 1993 on Public Education and Act CXXXIX of 2005 on Higher Education, respectively.
14
3.4.2 Institutional framework: IVET Bodies responsible for decision-making in IVET include: (a) European Union policy-makers; (b) the central government; (c) county governments; and (d) various advisory and decision-making bodies involving the social partners. EU policy initiatives and directives have a significant impact on national policy development, as manifested, for example, in the priorities of educational strategies of recent years. The planning, implementation and monitoring tasks related to the utilisation of EU Structural Funds assistance furthermore contribute to the development of strategic policy planning and cooperation with the social partners and among various concerned ministries. The sectoral administration of VET and adult training was unified in 2006 when VET was placed under the supervision of the Minister of Social Affairs and Labour(Szociális és Munkaügyi Miniszter) responsible also for employment and social policy. The Minister of Social Affairs and Labour is responsible for the content regulation of VET, but it issues relevant Decrees with the assent of the Minister of Education and Culture (Oktatási és Kulturális Miniszter) who is in charge of the sectoral administration of public and higher education. The latter is responsible for the regulation of VET provision within the formal school system (mainly IVET), but requires the assent of the Minister of Social Affairs and Labour for Decrees related to school-based VET. Cooperation between the two ministers regarding the allocation of resources available for development from the training sub-fund of the Labour Market Fund (Munkaero-piaci Alap, MPA), is also prescribed by the law. Other ministers (twelve in number) have responsibilities regarding the content of VET: they define the outcome requirements and develop the central curricula of vocational qualifications listed in the OKJ within their sector. The county (and capital city) governments are charged with the medium-term planning and coordination tasks of public education where IVET is primarily offered. Social partners are also involved in the policy and decision-making processes of VET – both IVET and CVET - through various advisory councils set up under the law. The most significant national consulting bodies are: (a)the National Interest Reconciliation Council (Országos Érdekegyezteto Tanács) serving as a tripartite forum for interest reconciliation regarding strategic questions of VET; (b)the National Vocational and Adult Training Council(Nemzeti Szakképzési és Felnottképzési Tanács, NSZFT), a consultative-advisory body of the Minister of Social Affairs and Labour, involving representatives of responsible ministries and various stakeholders, participating in the development of the OKJ and the allocation of development resources available from the MPA training sub-fund; and (c)the OKJ committee advising the development of the OKJ.
15
The purview of the seven Regional Development and Training Committees (regionális fejlesztési és képzési bizottságok, RFKB), dominated by representatives of the economy, has been considerably expanded recently in order to ensure the coordinated development and provision of IVET (school-based VET) in line with the regional labour market demands. In addition to preparing regional strategies for VET development, tendering development funds and defining the regional lists of vocations in short supply on the labour market, since 2008 the RFKBs: (a)decide on the goals of regional VET development and development support from the decentralised section of the MPA training sub-fund; (b)decide on the regional demands of VET and the vocational programme offers and appropriate shares of student enrolment; and (c)make proposals concerning the distribution of development subsidy (fejlesztési támogatás) among schools/qualifications and on the regional volume of development funds as well. At local level, consultative boards with a majority representation from the economy have to be set up at each Regional Integrated Vocational Training Centre (Térségi Integrált Szakképzo Központ, TISZK). The board shall review, among other things, the vocational programmes (curricula) of the VET schools and the higher education institution constituting the TISZK and the training plan of the central training location (központi képzohely), and can make recommendations for the modification of the training offer of the schools and the central training location, or the use of development subsidy.
3.4.3 Implementation level Bodies responsible for implementation in IVET include: (a)national agencies assisting the sectoral administration tasks of concerned ministries; (b)the two economic chambers; and (c)school maintainers and training providers. The National Institute of Vocational and Adult Education (Nemzeti Szakképzési és Felnottképzési Intézet, NSZFI) assists the Minister of Social Affairs and Labour in its development, coordination, research, information and counselling tasks related to VET and adult training, including the management of the registers of the vocational examination and of accredited adult training institutions and programmes. The Education Office (Oktatási Hivatal) and its regional offices perform public authority tasks in public and higher education, including the organisation of national examinations and surveys, performance of quality assurance functions, and the recognition of qualifications issued abroad. The Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Magyar Kereskedelmi és Iparkamara) and the Hungarian Chamber of Agriculture (Magyar Agrárkamara) – in cooperation with the national economic interest representation organisations – participate in the development of the outcome requirements of OKJ qualifications and the organisation of level and vocational examinations in IVET. They also perform quality assurance functions related to school-based VET (monitoring apprenticeship and other forms of practical training). 16
Upper and post-secondary IVET is offered in vocational school (szakiskola) and secondary vocational school (szakközépiskola), respectively (though the majority of institutions offer both types of VET school programmes). Higher level VET programmes (ISCED 5B) are provided by higher education institutions (colleges, universities) or vocational training schools, the latters according to a cooperation agreement concluded with the higher education institution providing the given training. VET school maintainers include local (i.e., county and municipal) governments, state-agencies, churches, foundations, etc. The maintainer is responsible for the lawful operation of the school and it approves its internal regulations as well as its educational and pedagogical programmes, but otherwise public education institutions enjoy autonomy in professional-pedagogical matters, supervised by the principal. The county (and capital city) governments are charged with the provision of the public education services that municipalities (local governments of cities and villages) are not obliged to provide, including upper-secondary VET. In additon to general maintenance duties, a school maintainer local (county or municipality) government has to develop a quality management programme defining its expectations of its schools and the order of their professional, legal and financial inspection. Pursuant to a legal amendment of 2007, school-maintaining local governments can form – and by 2009 have indeed all formed – VET organisation partnerships (szakképzés-szervezési társulás, a type of TISZK) in order to coordinate their VET provision in line with the decisions of the RFKBs concerning the harmonisation of VET development. These partnerships then become entitled and obligated to assume the rights and duties of the county local government regarding local VET provision. In higher education, the maintainer (the state, churches, foundations, etc.) monitors the management, legal operation, efficiency and the effectiveness of the professional work of higher education institutions, which otherwise enjoy wide-ranging autonomy in both administrative and pedagogical matters. Cooperation between various school maintainers and training providers is encouraged primarily by the promotion of the establishment of TISZKs.
3.5 The legislative and institutional framework and implementation level for CVET 3.5.1 Legislative framework for CVET In addition to Act LXXVI of 1993 on Vocational Education and Training and Act LXXXVI of 2003 on the Vocational Training Contribution and Support for the Development of Training), the most important piece of legislation regulating the provision of CVET programmes offered in adult training, i.e., outside the formal school system is Act CI of 2001 on Adult Training. This law provides a definition of the concept of adult training and defines its administrative and institutional system, content requirements (accreditation of institutions and programmes, content of adult training contracts, etc.), and statesupport schemes.
17
Act IV of 1991 on Facilitating Employment and Provisions to the Unemployed regulates the provision of state-supported training for the unemployed and other target groups. Collective agreements do not play a significant role in CVET. The dominant level of bargaining in Hungary is at the company level, but even these company level agreements usually contain only general provisions and framework rules regarding training support, leaving the details for the individual ‘study contracts’ through which the employer can support the training of employees,as regulated in the Labour Code (Act XXII of 1992).
3.5.2 Institutional framework: CVET In addition to the European Union, the central government and various advisory councils involving the social partners bodies responsible for decision-making in CVET offered in adult training include: •
Regional Labour Councils (munkaügyi tanács) including the social partners, serving as tripartite forums for regional-level interest reconciliation concerning the training of unemployed and other target groups supported by the labour organisation;
•
professional consultative boards (including representatives of professional organisations and other stakeholders and adult training experts) of accredited adult training institutions.
3.5.3 Implementation level Bodies responsible for implementation in CVET provided as adult training include: •
the Adult Training Accreditation Body (Felnottképzési Akkreditáló Testület), involving representatives of the social partners, performing tasks related to (voluntary) institution and programme accreditation;
•
Regional Labour Centres (regionális munkaügyi központ) of the Public Employment Service (Állami Foglalkoztatási Szolgálat, ÁFSZ), charged with registering adult training providers and programmes and inspecting their subsequent legal operation;
•
the two economic chambers, responsible for developing the outcome requirements of and organising master examinations (mestervizsga), and assisting the labour centres in inspecting the practical training part of OKJ programmes;
Adult training providers include public and higher education institutions and other budgetary or statesupported institutions (e.g. Regional Training Centres of the ÁFSZ), training companies, non-profit organisations, employers (internal training), chambers, etc. Training providers are free to develop and provide their training programme if registered at the Regional Labour Centre (regionális munkaügyi központ).
3.6 Vocational Education and training at tertiary level Tertiary level education offered by higher education institutions includes:
18
a. higher level VET (felsofokú szakképzés, FSZ) programmes awarding an ISCED 5B level vocational qualification (szakképesítés) of the OKJ, and b. higher education degree programmes (felsofokú végzettséget adó felsooktatási programok) awarding an ISCED 5A level qualification (szakképzettség) which allows access to a given occupation.
3.6.1 Higher level vocational education and training The higher level VET (felsıfokú szakképzés, FSZ), a relatively new level of VET in Hungary, was introduced in 1998. The initial goal of ISCED 5B programmes awarding higher level vocational qualification but no higher education graduation degree was to offer a shorter than higher education modular training that can quickly respond to the demands of a changing labour market, which prepares its participants for high quality professional work and at the same time provides the necessary credits helping the entry from VET to higher education. FSZ can be organised only by colleges (foiskola) and universities (egyetem), but it may be - and is to a large extent - provided also in secondary vocational schools (szakközépiskola), based on an agreement between the institutions; thus the legal status of participants and the administrative, financing and statistical systems vary according to the type of training provider. The provision of VET is regulated by Act LXXVI of 1993 on Vocational Education and Training; other aspects of education are governed by Act CXXXIX of 2005 on Higher Education. There are full-time and part-time FSZ courses available, which can be either state-supported or fee-charging. The minimum duration of training is four terms, and the same or longer in alternative delivery modes. In case the training is taking place in a higher education institution, entry into FSZ is conducted according to admission requirements – defined in Government Decree – on the base of a point system built on the base of the results achieved at the two-level secondary school leaving examinations and in the course of secondary school studies. In case the training is provided in a secondary vocational school, admission requirements are prescribed by the school, within the frames defined by the maintainer. Prior formal learning in VET of the same content can be recognised in 30-60 credit points. The curricula (central programme) of FSZ courses are developed by the institutions in accordance with the SZVK of the given OKJ vocational qualification published by the minister of the relevant field, taking into consideration the training programme also issued by the minister. In case of FSZ a higher education institution and the interested economic (profession) chamber – based on an agreement on SZVKs on the part of the responsible minister – together will work out these SZVKs (professional and examination requirements) and they will initiate the new vocational qualificationto be registered in the OKJ. The vocational qualification must be registered in the OKJ following a simplified and expedited procedure if the minister responsible for VET agrees. As in the case of all OKJ vocational qualifications, the SZVK define the maximum duration of the training programme, the balance of time devoted to theoretical and practical training, the competences to be mastered, and the requirements of the vocational examination (szakmai vizsga). Curricula for these courses are of a modular structure, involving a basic education/competence developing, a mandatory vocational, and an optional
19
(specialisation) module. Practical training may be provided in similar forms to those described in section 0403, both in school workshops and at economic organizations. Student contracts (hallgatói szerzodés) have also been available since 1 January 2006 if the practical training is provided without interruption for at least 25% of the duration of the training. People above 18 may participate in FSZ; the upper age limit (age 23) exists only at trainings organized by public education institutions in case of state funded programmes. The assessment and the organizing of the education during the training depend on the organizing institution. As such, in case of a VET institution the assessment and organizing forms of the public education are decisive, whereas in the case of a higher education institution then the assessments and organizing forms of higher education. However, the possibility (that large numbers of students make use of) exists for every participant to use the credits obtained in higher level VET (minimum 30, maximum 60) in a BA/BSc programme of the same field (thus reducing the duration of their training typically by 1-2 terms). The ISCED 5B level OKJ vocational qualifications (felsofokú szakképesítés) obtainable upon passing the vocational examination do not provide a higher education graduation degree, but give access to the labour market in occupations defined in their SZVKs. The number of FSZ level qualifications currently offered by the OKJ (i.e. the number of qualification without any branches and the number of branches altogether) is 73. HVET is fully state funded, even in the case of those students who already posses a vocational qualification at ISCED 3 or 4 level. Even after obtaining FSZ higher education studies are free of charge (in the case of higher education degree) and thus students are encouraged to participate in higher education to obtain a higher education degree.
4 Status of the industrial waste management labour market 4.1 Overview of waste management industry in the country The structure of Hungarian environmental industry cannot be considered as up-to-date. The dominance of the major sectors remained the same: 37% of environmental investments were spent on waste management, 18% on wastewater treatment, 15% on the protection of soil and groundwater, and 11% on the protection on the purity of air. Hungary is not rich in natural resources, thus it is especially important for us to develop material and energy-saving technologies, to deal with waste utilization, and to increase the ratio of renewables. The development plans, also taking into consideration the National Development Policy Concept, are totally inconformity with the guidelines formulated in the Government’s mid-term (2007-2013) Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STI) Strategy.
4.2 waste management and remediation
20
Based on the figures of WMIS5 there was less than 16Mt of waste generated in Hungary in 2010; from this amount a somewhat more than 4Mt was solid municipal waste, and the entire amount of hazardous waste has been under 1Mt for years (850 kt). The amount of non-hazardous industrial waste is 6.2 Mt that compared to the previous year shows a descending tendency; its majority is composed of slag and flying ashes from the power plants. The amount of construction-demolition waste is relatively constant (3.9 Mt), but the range or biologically degradable waste has fortunately decreased significantly (the amount has decreased from the 6Mt of 2004 to 1 Mt); this is most probably due to the fact that the utilization of agricultural and food industry based waste is considered as increasingly important in other agricultural sectors, in the enhancement of the soil’s production capacity and also as a renewable energy source. Only 40% of industrial non-hazardous waste is disposed, whereas the remaining amount gets into some utilization process, from which the level of energetic utilization does not reach 10% of the entire volume. As far as hazardous waste is concerned, the disposal ratio is better (32%, where thermic disposal represents only 8%); in the past few years waste recycling has become increasingly important (33%). In the treatment of construction-demolition waste the ratio of the landfill of waste is decreasing (45%), but the characteristic form of utilization is not the recycling of construction materials, but the filling of fields. The major direction of the management of solid municipal waste is still disposal; the utilized amount hardly reaches 25%. By joining the so-called major projects - that strive to ensure communal solid waste management on a regional level - established with the utilization of EU-funds several additional developments have also been realized aiming at establishing the conditions of residential selective waste collection. Back then in Hungary the industry related policy supported the propagation of selective landfill islands in the first place, obviously as a result of their lower cost level, thus this possibility has become accessible for about 6 million people in some 10,000 landfill islands by now. However, in some regions good experiences have been obtained with a ‘delivery from home’ type collection system; the ratio of the application of this system is expected to grow in the future. However, the system of city-wide clean-up is to be regarded as extremely under-developed; this service is provided by the public utility provider 1-2 times a year in an action-like way, and the solutions applied trigger much aversion from the population. In Hungary there are currently approximately 100 waste yards available, but these are generally outside built-up areas with bad accessibility, and their number is extremely low. It is a great task for the future to have such high standard waste yards available for the population in appropriate density, where any kind of household waste is disposable that cannot be carried away by the regular public utility services.
4.3 Economics of waste management in Hungary 14 % of the state environmental investments has been used for waste management, 22% of the process integrated investments were related to the waste management.
5
Waste Management Information System, operated by: Ministry of Rural Development
21
Figure 4.1 Investments in environment protection in Hungary. Source: Statisztikai tükör VI. évf. 100. sz. (2012/100). KSH. Környezetvédelmi ráfordítások és környezetvédelmi ipar 2011. (yellow – waste management)
Compared to the year 2010 in 2011 10 % more has been paid for the outsourced environmental services; 57 % was used for waste management. 72 % of the net income from export of the environmental industry was covered by the solid waste utilisation management facilities in 2011.
Others Hazardous waste collection and treatment Utilisation of solid waste Non- Hazardous waste collection and treatment Waste water treatment
Figure 4.2 Net income from pollution decreasing products and services
Within the environmental industry sector there were in 2011 18,5 thousand people employed, 3.5 % more than in the year 2010. The emloyment in the direct pollutiondecrease sector in the last ten years is shown in the Figure 4.3.
22
Others Hazardous solid waste treatment Utilisation of solid waste Waste water treatment Non- Hazardous waste treatment
Figure 4.3 Number of employment within the sectors connecting to the direct polluton decreasing
5 Survey results Among the waste management facilities (type (e.g. collection, landfill, incineration, recycling) the highest share is represented by waste collection companies from the number of the questionnaires, see Figure 5.1.
Figure 5.1. Share of the types of waste managemenet faciliities in the surveys
The sizes of the facilities are the following (Figure 5.2):
23
Figure 5.2. Size of the facilities taking part in the survey
About the composition of waste management industry (e.g. public/ private sector) there is no information available yet. There are relevant differences between the waste management companies especially within the qualification and in the attitude to the waste treatment. The committed companies, who want to gain market employ more skilled professionals and have better contact to the customers.
5.1 Working conditions The qualitative assessment of working conditions (health and safety) in different waste management facilities is summarized in the Figure 5.3 based on opinions of survey respondents.
Figure 5.3 Evaluation of working conditions in waste management facilities
As it can be seen from the figure Figure 5.3 in general the working conditions are satisfactory and good. The best conditions are in the waste recycling facilities and the worst in the waste collection and sorting facilities.
24
There is no information given in the questionnaires on the salary level in different waste management facilities and on Competition for employment in Hungary.
5.2 Knowledge related information The importance of knowledge in particular areas of waste management facilities’ managers and specialists perceived by different stakeholders from survey is summarized in Figure 5.4.
Figure 5.4 Importance of knowledge in waste management
The fields with the highest importance of knowledge are the following: -
Environmental Impact Assessment National legal requirements concerning waste management Principles of waste classification 25
-
Technical requirements for equipment and technologies of waste management facility / activity in concern Principles of emergency preparedness and planning of preventive corrective actions Health and safety procedures
The waste management policy principles and Procedures and principles of product’s life-cycle assessment had the less important interest. Between the VET availability and the current knowledge there is no relevant difference, the knowledge and the availability are in line with each-other, as it can be seen from the Figure 5.5.
Figure 5.5 Comparison between availability of VET and knowledge in different fields in waste management
However it appears some difference between the importance and knowledge and such with the availability too in the following fields (see Figure 5.6 and Figure 5.7): 26
The highest difference is in - the monitoring of the environmental parameters - National legal requirements concerning waste management - Principles of emergency preparedness and planning of preventive corrective actions - Criteria on waste classification These fields are considered to be with high importance but the availability in the education and as a consequence the knowledge is lower than is expected. Two other fields have been mentioned in the surveys additionally. There is a high need/ importance for the knowledge on Complex overview of waste management technologies and environmental impacts, however its availability and knowledge is very low. With administration the situation is controversial. (Figure 5.6.)
Figure 5.6. Comparison between importance and knowledge in different fields in waste management
27
Figure 5.7. Comparison between importance and availability of VET in different fields in waste management
The importance of practical skill in particular areas of waste management facilities’ managers and specialists is perceived by different stakeholders: waste management facilities, training organisations and authorities is shown in Figure 5.8. More practical knowledge is needed especially in Environmental Impact Assessment and Health and safety procedures.
28
Figure 5.8 Time share of theory and practice in trainings
The competences that are not adequately covered by the existing training programmes available in Hungary are: For managers
For technicians
Legal/regulation background, Legal/regulation background, Complex overview of waste management technologies Lift trailer operator and environmental impacts New technologies, new materials and their application New technologies, new materials and their application Abroad introduced, tried and suitable technical Abroad introduced, tried and suitable solutions, best practices technical solutions, best practices International processes, environmental and waste Environment awareness management policy, international regulation environment Good/best management principles communication to the Residential and business area in Awareness forming
5.3 Interest/ willingness of SWF professionals to attend VET According to the survey’s results the major part of the professionals has middle interest/willingness to attend VET. The proportion with low interest is below 10 % (Figure 5.9).
Figure 5.9. Willingness of taking part in trainings
29
6 Annexes PART 1 6.1 Example of questionnaire KÉRDŐÍV HULLADÉKFELDOLGOZÓ ÜZEMEK KÉPVISELŐINEK 1. Az Ön által képviselt létesítmény típusa x hulladék gyűjtő vállalkozás hulladék válogató létesítmény hulladék újrafeldolgozó létesítmény hulladékégető hulladéklerakó egyéb ............................................................. 2. Kérjük, jelölje be, hogy jelenleg hány foglalkoztatott dolgozik az Ön cégében x < 50 50 - 100 >100 3. Mi a véleménye arról, hogy a hulladékkezelő létesítmények szakembereinek az érdeklődése/ hajlandósága szakképzésen való részvételre: x Magas Alacsony Közepes
4. Kérjük, jelölje be, mit gondol a hulladékkezelő létesítmények szakembereinek szóló képzési programok elérhetőségéről Magyarországon! A program típusa Vezetőknek szóló Technikusoknak programok szóló programok Regisztrált/ hivatalos programok, megfelelő megfelelő amelyek képesítéssel érnek véget a nem megfelelő nem megfelelő résztvevők számára Egyéb (nem hivatalos) programok, x megfelelő x megfelelő amelyek hulladékkezelő létesítmények nem megfelelő nem megfelelő vezetői vagy szakszemélyzete számára érdekesek Online szakképzési programok x megfelelő x megfelelő elérhetősége nem megfelelő nem megfelelő 5. Kérjük, jelölje meg, mi a véleménye a következő témák fontosságáról hulladék kezelő létesítmények szakembereinek szóló szakképzésekben és a jelenlegi tudásukról/ ismereteikről! Téma Fontosság Szakképzési Jelenlegi programok ismeretek elérhetősége /képességek hulladékkezelő létesítmények szakemberei körében Hulladékgazdálkodási szektorról szóló x alacsony alacsony alacsony nemzeti joganyagok közepes x közepes közepes x magas magas magas 30
Hulladékgazdálkodási szektorról szóló EU joganyagok Hulladékok osztályozásáról szóló kritériumok (veszélyes vagy nem) Hulladékgazdálkodási elvek és tervek
szakpolitikai
Különböző szilárd hulladék áramok
Hulladékkezelő létesítmények környezetvédelmi hatásai Hulladékkezelő létesítmények és tevékenységek környezetvédelmi paramétereinek monitoringja Hulladékkezelő létesítményekben alkalmazott eljárások és technológiák Hulladékkezelő létesítményekben használt berendezések technikai specifikációja Hulladékkezelő létesítményekkel kapcsolatos nemzeti követelmények (engedélyek, hulladékok könyvelése, jelentések, stb.) Vészhelyzetek megoldásának tervezése és a válasz intézkedések elvei Termékek életciklus-elemzésének elvei és gyakorlata Környezetvédelmi menedzsment rendszerek (EMAS és az EN ISO 14000 sorozat) Üzleti ügyvitel elvei
Munkahelyi egészség és biztonság
alacsony közepes x magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony x közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony x közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
Egyéb (kérjük, adja meg):
31
6. Bármilyen képesség, amelyeket a meglévő szakképzési programok nem megfelelően fednek le az országban. Vezetőknek szóló programok
Technikusoknak szóló programok
7. Hogyan értékelné az országban meglévő szakképzési programokat? Minőségi mutatók
Vezetőknek programok Szakterület/ tartalom alacsony közepes magas Elméleti és gyakorlati képzés alacsony integrációja közepes magas Az oktatási anyagok minősége alacsony közepes magas Az oktatók felkészültsége alacsony közepes magas Oktatási létesítmények alacsony közepes magas Egyéb (kérjük, adja meg): alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
szóló Technikusoknak szóló programok alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
8. Melyek a legfőbb problémák /akadályok a hulladékkezelő létesítmények vezetői számára hirdetett szakképzések előtt? Nem jut el az információ, időhiány, magas árak. .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................... 9. Mi a véleménye a hulladékgazdálkodási szektorban jellemző munka körülményekről? Hulladékgazdálkodó szektor Hulladékgyűjtő vállalkozások
Munkafeltételek (1-5) rossz 32
Hulladékválogató létesítmények
Hulladék újrafeldolgozó létesítmények
Hulladékégető üzemek
Hulladéklerakók
kielégítő x jó nagyon jó rossz kielégítő x jó nagyon jó rossz kielégítő x jó nagyon jó rossz kielégítő x jó nagyon jó rossz kielégítő x jó nagyon jó
33
6.2 List of waste management facilities and authorities taking part in the survey AKSD ASA Duparec Loacker Global 2000 FKF Enviroinvest AVEZÖLDFOK ÉMK Győri Hulladék Atevszolg Mikrolin Holofon Recylab Textrade B.I. Geosol KVI Plusz Amolnar Arcus center Ankel GEOSAN Hungaropec Hunviron Megoldás matadella ÖKOPACK Naturplusz EWC-H Sarpi Dorog Hamburger Hungaria AVE Zöldfok Bihari DS Smith Holofon Profes Septox Total Enqua Feparec Csaosz 34
Tiszántúli hatóság Felsőtiszavidéki Hatóság Felsőtiszavidéki zöldhatóság KSZGYSZ Gödöllő Bajai főisk. SZIE Óbudai egyetem Szarvas Tessedik campus SZIE Szarvas Innoprojekt AACM
35
PART 2 Existing training procedures of professionals in Solid Waste Management Industry in Hungary 7 Training structure The training structure (Procedure for establishment of structure (who, how), Description of the structure, duration) is described in the PART 1 of the report. The after-work and weekend courses are divided in blocks, with interval for home-tasks. The training methods combine theory and practice. In manager level the training location is on the job training, and the practice is mainly solved also by companies . According to the survey results online training programmes are not sufficiently available, with the registered and informal programmes are mainly sufficient available.
8 Training contents Topics covered and in the different trainings (from the survey for organizations providing training for waste management facilities’ managers and technicians) are summarized in Figure 8.1 It is suggested to change the education with shifting to more practical knowledge and to adapt the best practices from the other EU member states. One example is that the major part of the freshly graduated environmental engineers does not have or knowledge or their knowledge covers a very little part on the current legal directives and regulations and the permission processes, and in some cases they even did not see any waste treatment facilities. The reason for this is obvious because the regulation is changing very rapidly and there are fields which are still not regulated. The processes and technologies applied in waste management facilities in Hungary are very disperse, a lot of them are obsolete or medium obsolete, and there are only few developments. The process “from waste to product” has to be enhanced both with regulation and standards and as well with education; however it would need strong background in development. The waste management sector related EU legislation is not known for the public and not even for the professionals. The composition and wording is to complex and sort and very difficult to understand. Procedures and principles of product’s life-cycle assessment is not or very rarely covered in Hungary. In lot of cases The companies meets the reuirements to the Environmental management systems (EMAS and the EN ISO 14000 series) only from necessity and having a qualification is not always covers the reality.
36
Figure 8.1. Topics coverage in the existing training programmes
9 Learning outcomes and acquired knowledge In general the training institutions reported good result from the learning outcomes point of view. The educational level of waste management facilities’ professionals who participate to vocational training programmes are mainly post graduated for the managers or professionals just before their upgrading nomination (with BSc, or University diploma mainly in the field of environmental engineers); for the technician elementary level and medium level with practice in the field. The learning outcomes and results depend highly on the previous qualification of the entering students/trainees. In the postgraduate VET trainings the results are better, however the previous knowledge and skills plays an important role. In lower competence level the competence and the previous knowledge are also important, but within this education the final results of the outcomes are more disperse. After the trainings the professionals will have the skill and competence to work as waste management and environmental professionals and middle level managers in waste treatment companies and facilities.
37
In the trainings for waste management technologist the trainees get good education, and the results are also good.
10 Evaluation of quality of existing training programs available in Hungary
Figure 10.1. Quality of the existing training programmes (a, b –evaluation according to professionals working in waste management sector, c, d - evaluation according to instituions providing training in waste management sector)
The quality of the content of the practical training is low, and it was also mentioned that the interdisciplinarity (especially related to environment – engineering – architecture fields) is missing.
11 Interest/ willingness of SWF professionals to attend VET According to the survey’s results the major part of the professionals has middle interest/willingness to attend VET. The proportion with low interest is below 10 % (Figure 5.9).
38
Figure 11.1. Willingness of taking part in trainings
12 Main problems/ obstacles related to vocational training for waste management facilities’ managers The main barriers can be divided in two groups. One is related to the available information (more practical knowledge is needed, and lack of new /up-dated teaching material). The other is the lack of resources, like financing (High cost of the training with a low cost–benefit proportion) and time (managers are overloaded). One more factor is that the trainings are centralized in the capital. The main general barriers from the side of participants are lack of time, lack of financial possibilities, lack of motivation, there is no up to date information, lack of new /up-dated teaching material. The information about the trainings does not arrive in time to the participants. The trainings are mainly during working time, there are very few trainings outside the working hours, that means that the participants will be absent from the work. The timing of the trainings are not flexible. Barriers mentioned by managers: The trainings are too theoretical and do not give up to date market related practical knowledge on the administrative tasks. The same is valid for the technicians. For the training for employees the applicants need to have a lift trailer operator certificate. The VET-s cannot follow up the continuous changes of the regulations. The Good/best management principles are incorporated only very slowly in the VET-s. There is a very strict cost control. The multinational companies solve the trainings for managers internally. From the training institution side: political influences, not enough participants, the managers have no time during workdays, trying to introduce weekend trainings, not enough motivated applicants, no permission/accreditation. Lack of new, updated training material.
39
13 Cost and possible source of financing The average cost of training for managers is around 500-800 EUR/semester/person (the training program can cost between 1000-4000 EUR/person), for technicians in a range of 1000-2000 EUR/ training program/person. The costs are covered mainly by the participants (50%), 25 % of the facilities pays the training for their employees, and in 25 % comes from third parties, subsidies. Training are generally expensive (average yearly income of technician/managers vs. programme costs), the semester cost is equivalent with the range of the monthly salary.
14 Conclusions There are relevant differences between the waste management companies especially within the qualification and in the attitude to the waste treatment. The committed companies, who want to gain market employ more skilled professionals and have better contact to the customers. According to the survey’s results the major part of the professionals has middle interest/willingness to attend the training, the main barriers are tha there is not enough practical knowledge, lack of new /updated teaching material, lack of resources, like financing (High cost of the training with a low cost– benefit proportion) and time (managers are overloaded). The fields with the highest importance of knowledge are the following: -
Environmental Impact Assessment National legal requirements concerning waste management Principles of waste classification Technical requirements for equipment and technologies of waste management facility / activity in concern Principles of emergency preparedness and planning of preventive corrective actions Health and safety procedures
The fields like the monitoring of the environmental parameters National legal requirements concerning waste management Principles of emergency preparedness and planning of preventive corrective actions - Criteria on waste classification are considered to be with high importance but the availability in the education and as a consequence the knowledge is lower than is expected. -
Generally the quality of trainings are good, however the quality of the content of the practical training is low. Missing competencies, knowledge and training contents are: interdisciplinarity (especially related to environment – engineering – architecture fields), complex overview of waste management technologies and environmental impacts, best practices, the waste management sector related EU legislation, New technologies, new materials and their application.
40
15 Annexes PART 2 15.1 Example of questionnaire KÉRDŐÍV HULLADÉKGAZDÁLKODÁSI SZAKEMBEREKNEK OKTATÁST NYÚJTÓ SZERVEZETEK RÉSZÉRE
1.
Milyen hulladékgazdálkodási szakembereknek szóló szakképzést nyújtanak? Regisztrált oktatási programokat hulladékkezelő szakembereknek x Nem regisztrált tréningeket kötelező témákról Egyéb nem kötelező témákról
2. Jelölje be az időbeosztást az elmélet/feladatok/ gyakorlati munkáról (képességfejlesztés) Képzési módszer Elmélet Feladatok Gyakorlati munka Egyéb (kérjük, részletezze)
Időtartam % 30 20 30 20
3. Kérjük, jelölje be, hogy a következő témákat mennyire fedik le a meglévő szakképzésben Téma
Jogilag kötelező
Vezetőknek szóló programok nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le
Hulladékgazdálkodási szektorról x igen szóló nemzeti joganyagok nem
Hulladékgazdálkodási szektorról igen szóló EU joganyagok x nem
Hulladékok osztályozásáról szóló x igen kritériumok (veszélyes vagy nem nem)
Hulladékgazdálkodási szakpolitikai elvek és tervek
Különböző áramok
szilárd
x igen nem
hulladék x igen nem
41
Szakembereknek szóló programok nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le
jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le x jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik x nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik x nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik
Hulladékkezelő létesítmények x igen környezetvédelmi hatásai nem
Hulladékkezelő létesítmények és x igen tevékenységek környezetvédelmi nem paramétereinek monitoringja
Hulladékkezelő x igen létesítményekben alkalmazott nem eljárások és technológiák
Hulladékkezelő létesítményekben berendezések specifikációja
igen használt x nem technikai
Hulladékkezelő létesítményekkel x igen kapcsolatos nemzeti nem követelmények (engedélyek, hulladékok könyvelése, jelentések, stb.) Vészhelyzetek megoldásának igen tervezése és a válasz x nem intézkedések elvei
A termékek életciklus igen elemzésének elvei és gyakorlata x nem
Környezetvédelmi menedzsment igen rendszerek (EMAS és az EN ISO x nem 14000 sorozat)
Üzleti ügyvitel elvei
Munkahelyi biztonság
egészség
igen nem
és x igen nem
jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le x jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le x megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik x nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik x nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik nem fedik le x kissé fedik le megfelelően fedik le jól lefedik
Egyéb (kérjük, adja meg): igen
nem fedik le 42
nem fedik le
nem
kissé fedik le kissé fedik le megfelelően megfelelően fedik le fedik le jól lefedik jól lefedik
4. Hogyan értékelték az oktatók és a tanulók az Önök által szervezett és a szilád hulladékgazdálkodás területén megvalósított szakképzéseket? Minőségi mutatók Szakterület/ tartalom
Elméleti és integrációja
gyakorlati
Oktatási anyagok minősége
Az oktatók felkészültsége
Oktatási létesítmények
Vezetőknek programok alacsony x közepes magas oktatás alacsony x közepes magas alacsony x közepes magas alacsony x közepes magas alacsony x közepes magas
szóló Technikusoknak szóló programok alacsony x közepes magas alacsony x közepes magas alacsony x közepes magas alacsony közepes x magas alacsony közepes x magas
Egyéb (kérjük, adja meg): alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
alacsony közepes magas alacsony közepes magas
5. Melyen a várható tanulási eredmények a tudás, képességek és kompetenciaszinteket tekintve, amelyeket a tanulók az oktatás alatt elsajátítanak? ........közepes.................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................
6. Mi átlagos költség, ami a tréning tanulói felé felmerül? ( EUR/ fő) Vezetőknek szóló programok 1500
Technikusoknak programok 1000
7. Ki viseli a hulladékgazdálkodási létesítmények szakembereinek szóló szakképzésen való részvétel költségeit? x Létesítmények az alkalmazottaikét Maguk a résztvevők Harmadik fél (pl. központi támogatások) 43
................................................................................................................................................ 8. Mi a véleménye arról, hogy a hulladékkezelő létesítmények szakembereinek milyen az érdeklődése/ hajlandósága a szakképzésen való részvételre: x Közepes Alacsony Magas
9. Milyen végzettségű hulladékgazdálkodási létesítményben dolgozó szakemberek vesznek részt az szakképzésben? ......................középfokú.................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .........
10. Melyek a legfőbb problémák /akadályok a hulladékkezelő létesítmények vezetői számára hirdetett szakképzés előtt? ...................A politikai befolyásolás.............................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................
44
15.2 List of high level training institutions Higher educational institutions providing trainings in Waste management
Egyetem
Budapesti Egyetem
Székhely
Corvinus
Budapesti Műszaki Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem
Budapest
és Budapest
honlap
Képzés
Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök (BSc) http://www.u • Megújuló erőforrások szakirány ni• Természetvédelem szakirány corvinus.hu/ • Környezettudatos kertészet szakirány Környezetmérnök BSc • Környezetmenedzsment szakirány • Környezettechnológia szakirány http://www.b Környezetmérnöki mesterszak (MSc) me.hu/ • Környezetmenedzsment szakirány • Környezettechnológia szakirány
Debrecen
Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnöki http://www.u BSc nideb.hu/ Hulladékgazdálkodási szakmérnök Hulladékgazdálkodási technológus
Eötvös Loránd Budapest Tudományegyetem
Környezettan BSc, szakirányok: • környezetkutató, • geofizikus, • meteorológus, • geológus http://www.el • környezettan te.hu/ Környezettudományi mesterszak, szakirányok: • Alkalmazott ökológia • Környezetfizika • Környezet-földtudomány • Műszeres környezeti analitika
Miskolci Egyetem
Környezetmérnök BSc • Környezetmenedzsment Szakirány • Geokörnyezetmérnöki Szakirány • Környezettechnikai Szakirány Környezetmérnök MSc (2010-ben http://www.u indul) ni• Hulladékgazdálkodási és miskolc.hu/ kármentesítési modul, • Környezeti eljárástechnika modul. Környezetmérnök 5 éves • Általános környezetmérnöki szakirány: matematika, kémia,
Debreceni Egyetem
Miskolc
45
•
•
•
Nyugat-Magyarországi Egyetem
Óbudai Egyetem
Pannon Egyetem
Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Szent István Egyetem
hulladékgazdálkodás Ipari környezetvédelmi szakirány: matematika, kémia, ipari technológiák Környezetgeofizikus-mérnöki szakirány: matematika, kémia, környezetgeofizika Gépészeti szakirány: matematika, kémia, zaj- és vibrációcsökkentés
Sopron
Erdőmérnöki kar: Környezetmérnök BSc Környezettan BSc Környezetkutató MSc Környezetmérnök MSc http://www.n Mezőgazdaságés yme.hu/ Élelmiszertudományi Kar Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök BSc Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök MSc (engedélyezés alatt)
Budapest
Környezetmérnök BSc • Könnyűipari szakirány http://bmf.hu/ • Villamosipari szakirány • Környezetinformatika szakirány
Veszprém
Környezetmérnök BSc • Környezettechnológia • Környezetállapot-értékelés http://www.u • Környezetmenedzsent ni-pannon.hu/ • Radioökológia Környezetmérnök MSc • Levegőkörnyezet • Limnológia
Pécs
Gödöllő
Alkalmazott környezetkutató BSc • Alkalmazott környezetkutató MSc felkészítő szakirány • Környezettan + X szakos tanár http://www.pt felkészítő szakirány e.hu/ Alkalmazott környezetkutató MSc • Alkalmazott ökológia szakirány • Környezetfizika szakirány Mezőgazdasági és Környezetvédelmi Kar: http://www.sz Környezetmérnök BSc ie.hu/ Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök BSc • Agrár-környezetgazdálkodási 46
szakirány • Környezet- és tájvédelem szakirány • Térségfejlesztés szakirány Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök MSc Hulladékgazdálkodási technológus OKJ: 55 621 02 0010 55 03 Víz- és Környezetgazdálkodási Kar: Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök BSc • Természetvédelmi-területfejlesztési szakirány • Hulladékgazdálkodási szakirány • Településüzemeltető szakirány
Széchenyi István Egyetem
Győr
Környezetmérnök BSc http://www.sz • Környezetelemzés e.hu/ • Környezettechnika • Akadémiai szakirány
11 egyetem
Főiskola
székhely
Eötvös József Főiskola
Eszterházy Főiskola
Károly
Károly Róbert Főiskola
Baja
honlap
Képzés
Környezetmérnök BSc • Vízgazdálkodás http://www.e • Víz- és szennyvíztisztítás jf.hu Hulladékgazdálkodási technológus OKJ: 55 621 02 0010 55 03
Eger
Alkalmazott környezetkutató BSc • Terepi környész szakirány • Technika szakirány http://www.e • Tanári szakirány ktf.hu (tanulmányaikat MSc szinten folytatva tanári végzettséget szerezhetnek) Hulladékgazdálkodási technológus (OKJ szám: 55 621 02 0010 55 03)
Gyöngyös
Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök BSc • Agrár-környezetgazda szakirány: Alternatív növénytáplálás; Integrált http://www.k növényvédelem; Al-ternatív arolyrobert.h növények termesztése; u Talajremediáció, Környezettudatos gazdálkodási módszerek. • Település-környezetgazda szakirány: Kert és zöldfelület gazdálkodás; 47
Főiskola
székhely
honlap
Képzés Településüzemeltetés, és – fejlesztés; Települési vízellátás, csatornázás és belterületi vízrendezés; Települési hulladékgazdálkodás; Települési energiastratégia; Ingatlan nyilvántartás. Hulladékgazdálkodási technológus OKJ: 55 621 02 0010 55 03
Környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök BSc http://www.k Hulladékgazdálkodási technológus efo.hu OKJ: 55 621 02 0010 55 03
Kecskeméti Főiskola
Kecskemét
Nyíregyházi Főiskola
Nyíregyháza
Környezettan BSc http://www.n Környezettan tanár MSc yf.hu
Szombathely
http://www.b Környezettan BSc dtf.hu Környezettan tanár MSc
Berzsenyi Dániel Főiskola Egyesült a NYME-mel
48
16 References http://eduline.hu/felnottkepzes/2013/3/1/Felsooktatasi_szakkepzes_legfontosabb_tudni_YXTH0K http://www.eqavet.eu/gns/what-we-do/implementing-the-framework/hungary.aspx
VET in Hungary ReferNet Country Report 2009 http://www.observatory.org.hu/wpcontent/uploads/TO7_eng.pdf Waste Management Information System, operated by: Ministry of Rural Development Statisztikai tükör VI. évf. 100. sz. (2012/100). KSH. Környezetvédelmi ráfordítások és környezetvédelmi ipar 2011
17 List of figures Figure 4.1 Investments in environment protection in Hungary. Source: Statisztikai tükör VI. évf. 100. sz. (2012/100). KSH. Környezetvédelmi ráfordítások és környezetvédelmi ipar 2011. (yellow – waste management) ..............................................................................................................................................22 Figure 4.2 Net income from pollution decreasing products and services ..................................................22 Figure 4.3 Number of employment within the sectors connecting to the direct polluton decreasing ......23 Figure 5.1. Share of the types of waste managemenet faciliities in the surveys........................................23 Figure 5.2. Size of the facilities taking part in the survey ...........................................................................24 Figure 5.3 Evaluation of working conditions in waste management facilities............................................24 Figure 5.4 Importance of knowledge in waste management .....................................................................25 Figure 5.5 Comparison between availability of VET and knowledge in different fields in waste management ...............................................................................................................................................26 Figure 5.6. Comparison between importance and knowledge in different fields in waste management .27 Figure 5.7. Comparison between importance and availability of VET in different fields in waste management ...............................................................................................................................................28 Figure 5.8 Time share of theory and practice in trainings ..........................................................................29 Figure 5.9. Willingness of taking part in trainings .......................................................................................29 Figure 8.1. Topics coverage in the existing training programmes ..............................................................37 Figure 10.1. Quality of the existing training programmes (a, b –evaluation according to professionals working in waste management sector, c, d - evaluation according to instituions providing training in waste management sector) ........................................................................................................................38 Figure 11.1. Willingness of taking part in trainings .....................................................................................39 49
50