KUESIONER PENELITIAN DETERMINAN KINERJA KADER POSYANDU DALAM MENUJU REVITALISASI POSYANDU DI KECAMATAN PANTAI LABU KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG TAHUN 2009 No responden
:.......................
I. KARAKTERISTIK INDIVIDU KADER POSYANDU 1)
Umur Responden
2)
Pendidikan Terakhir
: ................ Tahun (Sebutkan)
a. Tamat SD b. Tamat SLTP c. Tamat SLTA d. Tamat D-3/S-1 3)
Pekerjaan Kader a. Ibu Rumah Tangga b. PNS c. Wiraswasta
II. MOTIVASI KADER (INSENTIF/JASA dan TANGGUNG JAWAB)
No 01
Jawaban TP CP SP
Pernyataan A. Insentif (Jasa) Insentif diterima setiap 3-6 bulan sekali
02
Insentif hanya dalam bentuk transportasi saja
03
Insentif/jasa yang diterima disesuaikan dengan tingkat pendidikan
04
Insentif yang diterima disesuaikan dengan beban kerja
05
Mendapatkan dana yang bersumber dari dana JAMKESMAS
06
Mendapatkan tambahan insentif dari iuran masyarakat
07
Kader menerima JPKMS
Keterangan: TP : Tidak Puas; CP=Cukup Puas dan SP= Sangat Puas.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Tabel Pertanyaan motivasi lanjutan No
Jawaban S K TP
Pernyataan
B. Tanggung Jawab 01 Mempersiapkan peralatan terlebih dahulu sebelum hari buka posyandu 02 Memperhatikan kenyamanan dan kebersihan ruangan posyandu 03 04
Mencatat dan mendengarkan setiap informasi dan keluhan masyarakat dalam kegiatan posyandu Membantu dan melaksanakan tugas sebagai kader posyandu
05
Menyediakan waktu setiap ada jadwal posyandu
06
Menjalankan tugas secara sukarela dan ikhlas
Keterangan : S=Sering; K=Kadang-kadang, dan TP=Tidak Pernah VARIABEL KINERJA Sebelum hari ”H”Posyandu Apakah Ibu melaksanakan beberapa kegiatan?
Sebelum hari ”H”Posyandu Apakah ibu?
(1) 1. Menyiapkan tempat pelaksanaan, peralatan, 1. Ya sarana dan prasarana, PMT sebelum posyandu 2. Tidak (2) dimulai. 2. Memberitahukan warga adanya kegiatan di 1. Ya (1) posyandu? 2. Tidak (2) 3. Mendata jumlah sasaran Ibu hamil, WUS, PUS, Ibu menyusui, Ibu balita, dan sasaran UPGK yang ada diwilayah posyandu binaan Ibu? 4. Melaksanakan pendaftaran pengunjung Posyandu balita dan ibu hamil.
1. Ya (1) 2. Tidak (2) 1. Ya (1) 2. Tidak (2)
(1) 5. Melakukan penimbangan balita dan Ibu hamil 1. Ya 2. Tidak (2) yang berkunjung ke posyandu? 6. Melakukan penimbangan balita dan Ibu hamil 1. Ya (1) yang berkunjung ke posyandu? 2. Tidak (2) 7. melakukan kegiatan penyuluhan kesehatan dan 1. Ya (1) gizi serta pemberian PMT bila menemukan 2. Tidak (2) balita Bbnya BGM ? 8. Membantu memberikan pelayanan kesehatan : 1. Ya (1) KB, imunisasi, Fe, Oralit dan obat-obatan 2. Tidak (2) lainnya bersama petugas kesehatan di Posyandu kepada pengunjung Posyandu
Universitas Sumatera Utara
(1) 9. Mencatat di secarik kertas yang diselipkan 1. Ya kedalam KMS/ buku KIA setelah menimbang 2. Tidak (2) balita dan Ibu hamil kemudian baru mencatat hasilnya di KMS/ buku KIA dan mengisi buku register ? (1) 10. Memberikan PMT dan penyuluhan kesehatan 1. Ya 2. Tidak (2) bila menemukan balita KEP? (1) 11. Melakukan konsultasi kepada petugas 1. Ya kesehatan bila menemukan balita sudah 3 (tiga) 2. Tidak (2) kali berturut-turut BBnya tidak naik ? Setelah hari ”H”Posyandu Apakah ibu?
12. Merapikan tempat posyandu, pencatatan dan evaluasi kegiatan
(1) melengkapi 1. Ya 2. Tidak (2)
(1) 13. Membuat grafik SKDN jumlah semua balita 1. Ya yang ada di wilayah binaan posyandu. S : 2. Tidak (2) Jumlah balita yang mempunyai KMS/ buku KIA. (1) 14. Melakukan tindak lanjut dan kunjungan rumah 1. Ya kepada sasaran yang tidak datang ke posyandu? 2. Tidak (2) (1) 15. Melakukan tatap muka ke tokoh masyarakat 1. Ya setempat dan menghadiri pertemuan rutin 2. Tidak (2) organisasi keagamaan dalam masyarakat seperti pengajian, wirit, arisan dan lain-lain.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2 HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA PENELITIAN VALIDITAS DAN REABILITAS VARIABEL INSENTIF
Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ****** _ R E L I A B I L I T Y
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
A N A L Y S I S
INSENT1 INSENT2 INSENT3 INSENT4 INSENT5 INSENT6 INSENT7
Statistics for SCALE
Mean 16.9000
-
S C A L E
(A L P H A)
Mean
Std Dev
Cases
2.5000 2.7000 2.5000 2.2000 2.4000 2.3000 2.3000
.7071 .4830 .7071 .6325 .6992 .6749 .6749
10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 N of Variables 7
Variance 16.9889
Std Dev 4.1218
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected ItemTotal Correlation
14.4000 14.2000 14.4000 14.7000 14.5000 14.6000 14.6000
11.8222 13.9556 11.8222 12.9000 12.0556 12.4889 12.9333
Item-total Statistics
INSENT1 INSENT2 INSENT3 INSENT4 INSENT5 INSENT6 INSENT7
Alpha if Item Deleted
.9597 .7758 .9597 .8120 .9154 .8478 .7416
.9429 .9592 .9429 .9550 .9467 .9523 .9608
Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha =
10.0
N of Items =
7
.9584
Universitas Sumatera Utara
VARIABEL TANGGUNG JAWAB
Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ****** _
R E L I A B I L I T Y A)
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
TGGJWB1 TGGJWB2 TGGJWB3 TGGJWB4 TGGJWB5 TGGJWB6
Statistics for SCALE
Mean 14.1000
A N A L Y S I S
-
S C A L E
(A L P H
Mean
Std Dev
Cases
2.3000 2.4000 2.2000 2.4000 2.3000 2.5000
.6749 .6992 .6325 .6992 .6749 .7071
10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 N of Variables 6
Variance 12.9889
Std Dev 3.6040
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected ItemTotal Correlation
11.8000 11.7000 11.9000 11.7000 11.8000 11.6000
9.2889 8.9000 9.8778 8.9000 9.2889 8.4889
Item-total Statistics
TGGJWB1 TGGJWB2 TGGJWB3 TGGJWB4 TGGJWB5 TGGJWB6
Alpha if Item Deleted
.7886 .8629 .6820 .8629 .7886 .9708
.9360 .9270 .9477 .9270 .9360 .9130
Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha =
10.0
N of Items =
6
.9423
VARIABEL KINERJA KADER POSYANDU
Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
Universitas Sumatera Utara
R E L I A B I L I T Y
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.
A N A L Y S I S
KINERJA1 KINERJA2 KINERJA3 KINERJA4 KINERJA5 KINERJA6 KINERJA7 KINERJA8 KINERJA9 KINERJ10 KINERJ11 KINERJ12 KINERJ13 KINERJ14 KINERJ15
Statistics for Mean SCALE 25.7000 Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted KINERJA1 KINERJA2 KINERJA3 KINERJA4 KINERJA5 KINERJA6 KINERJA7 KINERJA8 KINERJA9 KINERJ10 KINERJ11 KINERJ12 KINERJ13 KINERJ14 KINERJ15
23.9000 24.0000 24.1000 23.9000 24.0000 23.9000 24.1000 23.9000 24.1000 23.9000 23.9000 24.1000 24.0000 24.0000 24.0000
R E L I A B I L I T Y
-
S C A L E
Std Dev
Cases
1.8000 1.7000 1.6000 1.8000 1.7000 1.8000 1.6000 1.8000 1.6000 1.8000 1.8000 1.6000 1.7000 1.7000 1.7000
.4216 .4830 .5164 .4216 .4830 .4216 .5164 .4216 .5164 .4216 .4216 .5164 .4830 .4830 .4830
10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 N of Variables 15
Variance 34.2333
Std Dev 5.8509
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected ItemTotal Correlation
29.6556 30.0000 30.1000 29.6556 29.5556 29.6556 30.1000 29.6556 30.5444 29.6556 29.6556 30.1000 30.0000 29.5556 30.4444 A N A L Y S I S
Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 10.0 Alpha = .9681
(A L P H A)
Mean
Alpha if Item Deleted
.9581 .7559 .6824 .9581 .8462 .9581 .6824 .9581 .6996 .9580 .7581 .6824 .7554 .8472 .6670 -
.9635 .9668 .9684 .9635 .9652 .9635 .9684 .9635 .9700 .9635 .9635 .9684 .9668 .9652 .9684
S C A L E
(A L P H A)
N of Items = 15
Frequencies
Universitas Sumatera Utara
UMUR
Valid
20-30 Tahun 31-40 Tahun Total
Frequency 18 36 54
Percent 33.3 66.7 100.0
Valid Percent 33.3 66.7 100.0
Cumulative Percent 33.3 100.0
DIDIKAN
Valid
Tamat SD Tamat SLTP Tamat SLTA Total
Frequency 18 17 19 54
Percent 33.3 31.5 35.2 100.0
Valid Percent 33.3 31.5 35.2 100.0
Cumulative Percent 33.3 64.8 100.0
DIDIK
Valid
Sedang Rendah Total
Frequency 36 18 54
Percent 66.7 33.3 100.0
Valid Percent 66.7 33.3 100.0
Cumulative Percent 66.7 100.0
JN_KERJA
Valid
IRT Wiraswasta/Pegawai Swasta PNS Petani/Buruh Total
Frequency 32
Percent 59.3
Valid Percent 59.3
Cumulative Percent 59.3
8
14.8
14.8
74.1
5 9 54
9.3 16.7 100.0
9.3 16.7 100.0
83.3 100.0
KERJA
Valid
Bekerja Tidak Bekerja Total
Frequency 24 30 54
Percent 44.4 55.6 100.0
Valid Percent 44.4 55.6 100.0
Cumulative Percent 44.4 100.0
Universitas Sumatera Utara
INSENTIF
Valid
Baik Sedang Kurang Total
Frequency 8 19 27 54
Percent 14.8 35.2 50.0 100.0
Valid Percent 14.8 35.2 50.0 100.0
Cumulative Percent 14.8 50.0 100.0
TGG_JWB
Valid
Rendah Sedang Tinggi Total
Frequency 10 19 25 54
Percent 18.5 35.2 46.3 100.0
Valid Percent 18.5 35.2 46.3 100.0
Cumulative Percent 18.5 53.7 100.0
Motivasi Kader Posyandu
Valid
Tinggi Sedang Rendah Total
Frequency 8 17 29 54
Percent 14.8 31.5 53.7 100.0
Valid Percent 14.8 31.5 53.7 100.0
Cumulative Percent 14.8 46.3 100.0
Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Valid
Baik Sedang Kurang Total
Frequency 15 10 29 54
Percent 27.8 18.5 53.7 100.0
Valid Percent 27.8 18.5 53.7 100.0
Cumulative Percent 27.8 46.3 100.0
Crosstabs UMUR * Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstab
UMUR
20-30 Tahun
31-40 Tahun
Total
Kinerja Kader Posyandu Baik Sedang Kurang 7 1 10 5.0 3.3 9.7 38.9% 5.6% 55.6%
Count Expected Count % within UMUR % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within UMUR % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within UMUR % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total
Total 18 18.0 100.0%
46.7%
10.0%
34.5%
33.3%
13.0% 8 10.0 22.2%
1.9% 9 6.7 25.0%
18.5% 19 19.3 52.8%
33.3% 36 36.0 100.0%
53.3%
90.0%
65.5%
66.7%
14.8% 15 15.0 27.8%
16.7% 10 10.0 18.5%
35.2% 29 29.0 53.7%
66.7% 54 54.0 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
27.8%
18.5%
53.7%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 3.667a 4.151 .304
2 2
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .160 .125
1
.581
df
54
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
DIDIK * Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstab
DIDIK
Sedang
Rendah
Total
Count Expected Count % within DIDIK % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within DIDIK % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within DIDIK % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total
Kinerja Kader Posyandu Baik Sedang Kurang 15 6 15 10.0 6.7 19.3 41.7% 16.7% 41.7%
Total 36 36.0 100.0%
100.0%
60.0%
51.7%
66.7%
27.8% 0 5.0 .0%
11.1% 4 3.3 22.2%
27.8% 14 9.7 77.8%
66.7% 18 18.0 100.0%
.0%
40.0%
48.3%
33.3%
.0% 15 15.0 27.8%
7.4% 10 10.0 18.5%
25.9% 29 29.0 53.7%
33.3% 54 54.0 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
27.8%
18.5%
53.7%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 10.614a 15.115 9.530
2 2
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .005 .001
1
.002
df
54
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
KERJA * Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstab
KERJA
Bekerja
Tidak Bekerja
Total
Kinerja Kader Posyandu Baik Sedang Kurang 10 3 11 6.7 4.4 12.9 41.7% 12.5% 45.8%
Count Expected Count % within KERJA % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within KERJA % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within KERJA % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total
Total 24 24.0 100.0%
66.7%
30.0%
37.9%
44.4%
18.5% 5 8.3 16.7%
5.6% 7 5.6 23.3%
20.4% 18 16.1 60.0%
44.4% 30 30.0 100.0%
33.3%
70.0%
62.1%
55.6%
9.3% 15 15.0 27.8%
13.0% 10 10.0 18.5%
33.3% 29 29.0 53.7%
55.6% 54 54.0 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
27.8%
18.5%
53.7%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 4.343a 4.383 2.685
2 2
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .114 .112
1
.101
df
54
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.44.
Motivasi Kader Posyandu * Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstab
Baik Motivasi Kader Posyandu
Tinggi
Sedang
Rendah
Total
Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total
Kinerja Kader Posyandu Sedang Kurang 5 2 1 2.2 1.5 4.3
Total 8 8.0
62.5%
25.0%
12.5%
100.0%
33.3%
20.0%
3.4%
14.8%
9.3% 7 4.7
3.7% 2 3.1
1.9% 8 9.1
14.8% 17 17.0
41.2%
11.8%
47.1%
100.0%
46.7%
20.0%
27.6%
31.5%
13.0% 3 8.1
3.7% 6 5.4
14.8% 20 15.6
31.5% 29 29.0
10.3%
20.7%
69.0%
100.0%
20.0%
60.0%
69.0%
53.7%
5.6% 15 15.0
11.1% 10 10.0
37.0% 29 29.0
53.7% 54 54.0
27.8%
18.5%
53.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
27.8%
18.5%
53.7%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 12.344a 13.386 11.018
4 4
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .015 .010
1
.001
df
54
a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.48.
Regression
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Variables Entered/Removedb Model 1
Variables Entered Motivasi Kader Posyandu, KERJA, UMUR, a DIDIK
Variables Removed
Method
.
Enter
a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu Model Summary Model 1
R .578a
R Square .334
Adjusted R Square .279
Std. Error of the Estimate .741
a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kader Posyandu, KERJA, UMUR, DIDIK
ANOVAb Model 1
Regression Residual Total
Sum of Squares 13.470 26.901 40.370
df 4 49 53
Mean Square 3.367 .549
F 6.134
Sig. .000a
a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kader Posyandu, KERJA, UMUR, DIDIK b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu Coefficientsa Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1
B -.534
Std. Error .647
UMUR
.085
.222
DIDIK
.495
.255
KERJA
.211
Motivasi Kader Posyandu
.489
(Constant)
Standardized Coefficients Beta
t -.825
Sig. .413
.046
.383
.703
.270
1.941
.009
.239
.121
.882
.382
.146
.413
3.355
.002
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Universitas Sumatera Utara