DAFTAR PUSTAKA Akiyama, S., 1997. Discarded Catch of Set Net Fisheries in Tateyama Bay. Journal of The Tokyo University of Fisheries.(In Javanese). Vo1.8 no.2. pp 53-64. Ali, M. A. 1962. Influences of Light Intensity on Retinal Adaptation in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Yearling. Canadian juornal of Zoology vo1.40: p 561- 569 Ali, M. A. 1975. Retinomotor Responses in Vision in Fishes (Ed. M. A. Ali). New Approaches in Research . Plenum Press, New York-London. pp 3 13-350. Ali. M. A. and H. J. Wagner. 1975. Retinomotor Responses. In Vision in Fishes (Ed. M. A. Ali). New Approaches in Research. Plenum Press, New York - London, pp 369-396. Ali, M. A and M. Anctil 1976. Retinas of Fishes an Atlas. Springer - VerlagBerlin. P 267. Allen, G., 2000. Marine Fishes of South - East Asia. A Field Guide for Anggers and Divers. Periplus. Singapura. P 292. Alverson, D. L, and S. E. Hughes 1995. Bycath: From Emotion to Effective Natural Resource Management in Solving By-catch: Considerations for Today and Tomorrow. Published by University of Alaska. P 13-28. Intensitas Arnin, E. M. Mahiswara. Hufiandi dan A. Salim. 2000. Pengaruh Cahaya dan Ukuran mata jaring Terhadap Selektivitas Payang Oras Bagi Penangkapan Cumi. Prosiding Hasil Penelitian Perikanan 199912000. DKP. Sekretariat Jenderal. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Eksplorasi Laut dan Perikanan Jakarta. Hal: 129-132. Anonim, 1979. Buku Pedoman Pengenalan Sumberdaya Perikanan Laut. Bagian I. Jenis-Jenis Ikan Ekonomis Penting. Dirjen Perikanan. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta. 170 hal. Anonim, 1992. Jenis - jenis Udang Laut dan Krustacea Lainnya di Indonesia. Balai Penelitian Perikanan Laut. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan. Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta. Ayodhyoa, A.U., 1967. An Analysis of Indonesia Coastal Fisheries and A Study on the Control Fish Movement by Light. Master Thesis. Tokyo University
of Fisheries, Post graduated Course. Science of Fishing Method Laboratory. Ayodhyoa, A. U., 1981. Metode Penangkapan Ikan . Yayasan Dewi Sri. Bogor. 90 hal. Arakawa,H. S. Choi. T. Arimoto. And Y. Nakarnura. 1998. Relationship Between Underwater Irradiance and Distribution of Javanese Common Squid Under Fishing Light of a Squid Jigging Boat. Journal of Fisheries Science. 64 (4), 553-557. Tokyo, Japan Arimoto,T., N.Watanabe and N. Okamoto, 1988. Retinomotor Respon of Jack Mackerel, Trachurus japonicus to Light Condition. Journal of the Tokyo University of Fisheries 75(2):333-34 1. Arimoto, T. 1995. Gyogyou ni Okeru Konkaku to ha in Gyogyou no Konkaku Mondai edited by Matsuda. Suisangaku Shirizu, 105: 11-20 (in Japanese). Arimoto,T., 1997. Fish Behaviour Approach for Improving Trawl Gear Selectivity Proceeding of the Regional Workshop on Responsible Fishing, South East Asian Fisheries Development Center, Samut Prakarn, p.251-265. Arimoto,T. 1999. Light Fishing. Paper in International Fisheries Training Center, JICA, Tokyo. Pp15 (unpublished). Arimoto, T., S.J.Choi and Y.G. Choi, 1999. Trend and Perspectives for Fishing Technology Research towards the Sustainable Development. Proceeding of 5 th International Symposium on the EEsient Application and Preservation of Marine Biological Resources. Osu National University. 135- 144 p Arimoto, T, 2000. Research and Education System of Fishing Technology in Japan. TUF-JSPS International Project. Vol. 8. March 2000. Proceeding the 3 rd JSPS International Seminar on Fisheries sciences in Tropical Area Sustainable Fishing Technology in Asia Towards the 21 st Century. Tokyo University of Fisheries. p 32-37. Arimoto,T. S. Akiyama and M. Miyagi, 2000. Low Investment Sustainable Technology of Coral Reef Fisheries. Case study in Ryukyu Island, Japan. TUF-JSPS International Project. Vol. 8. March 2000. Proceeding the 3 rd JSPS International Seminar on Fisheries sciences in Tropical Area Sustainable Fishing Technology in Asia Towards the 21 * Century. Tokyo University of Fisheries. P 155-160. Arimoto, T. 2001. Technical Approach to Minimize Fishing Impacts Toward Sustainable Fisheries. in Solving By-catch: Considerations for Today and Tomorrow. Published by University of Alaska. P 13-28.
Arimoto,T. Baskoro,M. S. and Sulistiono. 2002. Introduction, General of Light Fishing. Fishing technology Manual Series 1. Light Fishing in Japan and Indonesia. TUF JSPS International Vol. 11 Dept. of Fisheries Resources Utilization , IPB. P 1 - 4 APO (Asian Productivity Organization), 2002. Sustainable Fishery Management in Asia.. Report of the APO Study Meeting on Sustainable Fishery Management. Tokyo. 324 p Baskoro, M. S., 1999. Capture Process of The Floated Bamboo-Platform Lifinet With Light Attraction (Bagan). Graduate School of Fisheries, Tokyo University of Fisheries . Doctoral Course of Marine Sciences and Technology. p 149 Baskoro, M., Purbayanto,A., Wahyu,R.I., Sudirman and T. Arimoto. 2002. Visual Physiology.. In Fishing Technology Manual Series 1. Light Fishing in Japan and Indonesia. The JSPS International Workshop 2001. Published by TUF International JSPS Project. Tokyo University of Fisheries. P 4658. Baskoro, M. S., B. Murdiyanto., Zulkarnaen and T.Arimoto. 2002a. The Effect of Underwater Illumination Pattern on The Catch of Bagan With Electric Generator in the West Sumatera Sea Waters, Indonesia. Proceedings of International Comrnerative Syrnpotium 70th Anniversary of the Javanese Society of Fisheries Science. Fisheries Sciences Tokyo.(68): 1873-1876. Bevelander, G and J. A. Ramaley. 1988. Dasar-Dasar Histologi. Edisi Kedelapan. Alih Bahasa, Wisnu Gunarso. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta. 460 hal. Ben-Yami, M. 1987. Fishing With Light. Published by Arrangement With The Agriculture Organization of The United Nation by Fishing News Books Ltd. Farnham, Surrey, England. p. 121. Bowmaker, J. K., 1990. Visual Pigment of Fishes. In The Visual System of Fish. Edited by Ron H. Douglas and Mustafa B. A. Djamgos. Published by Chapman and Hall Ltd, London. p 8 1-107. BPPL 1996. Jenis-jenis udang di Indonesia. Jakarta. Von Brandt, A.. 1985. Fish Catching Methods of the World. Third Edition. Fishing News Books Ltd. Famham. P.418. Burgess, W. E., H. R. Axelrod, and R. Hunziker. 1991. Mini-Atlas of Aquarium Fishes. Mini edition. T.F.H. Publication inc.
Marine
Carpenter, K. E and V. H .Niem., 1999. The Living Marine Resources of The Western Central Pacific. FA0 Species Identification Guide For Fishery
Purposes. Volume 4. Bony Fishes Part 2 (Mungilidae to Caranginade). FA0 of The United Nations. Rome. P 2797-3 120. Carpenter, K. E and V. H. Niem., 2001. The Living Marine Resources of The Western Central Pacific. FA0 Species Identification Guide For Fishery Purposes. Volume 5. Bony Fishes Part 3 (Menidae to Pomacentridae). FA0 of The United Nations. Rome. P 2122-2653. CCRF (FAO), 1995. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries.. Rome , Italy. Chopin, F. And Inoue, Y. 1997. Cooperative Research in Asian FisheriesFuture Direction and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Responsible Fishing, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center. Samut Prakarn. P. 432-442 Clucas, I. 1998. By-Catch - Is It a Bonus From the Sea. Infofish International. Malaysia (3):24-28 Davis, C. C. 1955. The Marine and Freshwater Plankton. University Press. P 562.
Michigan
State
Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan, 2000. Statistik Perikanan (Fisheries statistics of Indonesia) 1998. No.28. Jakarta.
Indonesia
Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Barru, 2002. Data Primer Bonto di Kabupaten Barru.
Punggawa
Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Sinjai, 2002. Data Perkembangan Bagan Rambo di Kabupaten Sinjai.
Primer
Douglas, R.H. and H. J.Wagner,. 1982. Endogenous Pattern of Photamichanical Movement in Teleost and Their Relation to Activity Rhythms. Cell Tissue Res. 226:133-144. Draper, N and Smith. 1992. Analisis Regresi Terapan. Edisi Kedua, Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Jakarta. Ediyono, S. H, Yusuf, M, Hendrawan, D. I. dan A. S. Nugroho., 1999. PrinsipPrinsip Lingkungan Dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta. 196 hal. Effendie, M. I. 1979. Metoda Biologi Perikanan. Yayasan Dewi Sri Bogor. 112 ha1 1997. Biologi Perikanan. Yayasan Yogyakarta. 163 hal.
Pustaka
Nusatama.
Efendy, M. 1998. Pengaruh Jurnlah Lampu Terhadap Komposisi dan Hasil Perairan Teluk Awur, Jepara Jawa Tangkapan Bagan Tancap di Tengah. Skripsi Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 43 hal. FAO, 1980. Echosounding and Sonar for Fishing. Published by Arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations by Fishing New Book ltd. England. P 104. Fernald, F. D. 1990. The Optimal System of Fishes. In The Visual System of Fish. Edited by Ron H. Douglas and M.B.A. Djamgoz. Published by Chapman and hall Ltd. London. p 46-6 1. Fitri, A.D. P. 2002. Ketajaman Penglihatan ikan juwi (Anodontostomachucunda) dan Aplikasinya pada penangkapan pukat cincing Mini. Master Tesis. Program Pascasarjana .IPB. 91 hal. Gaspersz, V. Metode Perancangan Percobaan. Untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, IlmuIlmu Teknik dan Biologi. Arrnico bandung. 472 hal. Gray,C.A., S. J. Kennely, K. E. Hodgson, C. J. T. Ashby and M.L. Beatson. 2001. Retained and Discarded Catch From Commercial Beach-Seining in Botani Bay Australia. Fisheries Research 50:205-219. Gunarso, W., 1985. Tingkah laku Ikan Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Metoda Dan Taktik Penangkapan. Diktat Kuliah (tidak dipublikasikan). Jurusan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan. Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor 28 1.Hal ., 1989. Bahan Pengajaran Mikroteknik. Departemen dan Kebudayaan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Universitas Ilmu Hayat. Institut Pertanian Bogor. 117 hal.
Pendidikan Pusat Antar
Gunarso,W dan D.Bahar. 1991. Diktat Kuliah Tingkah Laku Ikan. Peningkatan Perguruan Tinggi Institut Pertanian Bogor. 186 hal.
Proyek
Gunarso, W., F. Punvangka, 1998. Cumi - Cumi dan Kerabatnya. Biologi, Etologi, Penangkapan serta Prospek Bisnisnya. Jurusan Pemanfaatan Sumerdaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Kelautan IPB. 227 hal. Gopakumar, K, 2002. Current State of Over Fishing and Its Impact on Sustainable Fisheries Management in The Asia-Pacific Region. In Sustainable Fishery Management in Asia. Asian Productivity Organization. Tokyo. P 37-57. Hall, M. A. Strategic Issue in Managing Fishery By-catch. In Solving By-catch: Considerations for Today and Tomorrow. Published by University of Alaska. P 29-39.
He, P, 1989. Fish Behaviour and its Application in Fisheries. Newfoundland and Labrador Institute of Fisheries and Marine Technology, Canada p 157. He, P. and T. Arimoto. 2001. System Approach to Reducing Unaccounted Fishing Mortalities. In Proceeding of the Satellite Workshop on fishing Impacts- Evaluation, Solution and Policy. Tokyo University of Fisheries. P:44-53. Herutomo, A.N., 1995. Pengaruh Intensitas dan Warna Cahaya Terhadap hasil Tangkapan Cumi - Cumi (Loligo sp) Pada Perikanan Bagan Tancap di Perairan Suradadi, Kabupaten Tegal. Skripsi Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 58 ha1 Hibiya, T and F. Takashima. 1982. An Atlas of Fish Histology, Normal and Pathological Features. Kodansha Ltd Tokyo. P 145. Holil, U., 2000. Studi Tentang Sebaran Cahaya Lampu TL dalam Air dengan sumber Solar Cell System pada Pengoperasian Bagan Apung. Skripsi Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 72 ha1 Hutabarat, S. dan Evans, 1986. Kunci Indentifikasi Zooplankton. UI. Jakarta. 98 hal.
Press
Hutomo, M., Burhanuddin, A. Djamali dan S. Martosewojo. 1987. Sumberdaya Ikan Teri di Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan OceanologiLIPI. Jakarta. 80 hal. Ishi, H and T. Kitahara. 2001. A discarding Problem of Mantis Shrimp in Tokyo Bay. In Proceeding of the Satellite Workshop on fishing ImpactsEvaluation, Solution and Policy. Tokyo University of Fisheries. P 36 - 37 Iskandar, M.D. H.A.U. Ayodhyoa, D.R.Monintja dan I.Jaya. 2001. Analisis Hasil Tangkapan Bagan Bermotor pada Tingkat Pencahayaan yang Berbeda di Perairan Teluk Semangka Kabupaten Tanggamus. Maritek vol. 1. No.2. ha1 79-98. Vertikal Iskandar, M. D. I. Jaya.R .I. Wahyu. 2001. Kerakteriktik Distribusi Cahaya Lampu Neon yang digunakan pada bagan motor di Teluk Semangka Larnpun. Bulletin PSP vo1.X 1. hal 59-72. JICA, 1997. The Fishing Technology Manual. A basic Out Line of Fishing Gears Methods. Kanagawa International Fisheries Training Center. p.327 and Jones,F. R. H. 1956. The Behaviour of Minnows in intensity. Journal Exp.Biol.33 (2). P 27 1-281.
Relation on
light
Juniarti,R., 1995. Studi Tentang Uji Coba Pengoperasian Bagan Apung dengan Bouke Ami di Perairan Teluk Pelabuhan Ratu, Sukaburni Jawa Barat. Skripsi Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 120 ha1 Krissunari, D., dan T. Hariati,. 1994. Pendugaan Ukuran Pertama Kali Matang Gonad Beberapa Ikan Pelagis Kecil di Perairan Utara Rembang. Jurnal Penelitian Perikanan Laut No.85; 48-53. Laevastu,T., and M. 1. Hayes., 1981. Fisheries Oceanography and Fishing News Books Ltd. London. p 238.
Ecology.
Laevastu,T and F. Favorite., 1988. Fishing and Stock Fluctuations. Fishing News. Books. Ltd. Farnhan. Surrey. England. P.239. Lasker, R. 1984. Marine Fish Larvae. Morphology, Ecology and Relation to Fisheries. Publisher Washington Sea Grant Program. Distributor, University of Washington Press Seattle and london. p 131. LevinsoqG and B. Burnside 1981. Circardian Rhythms in Teleost Retinomotor Movement. A Comparison of the effects of Circardian Rhythm and Light Condition on Cone Length. Assoc.For.Res. in Vis. And Opthal., Inc.20 (3):294-302. Lieske, E. R. Myers 1997. Reef Fishes of the World. A Comprehensive Identification, Guide to 2000 species . Periplus, Hongkong. P. 1400. Linting, M. L., dan Wijopriono, 1993. Pengaruh Warna Cahaya Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Pada Penangkapan Ikan Hias Dengan Alat Bantu Jurnal Pen. Perikanan Laut No. 82. Balai Penelitian Cahaya. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Perikanan Laut . Departement Pertanian. Jakarta. hal 1-10 Mahfbd,M., 1995. Pengaruh Penggunaan Lampu Petromaks dan Lampu Neon (TL) Bawah Air Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Ikan Kembung (Rastralliger brachyosoma) Dengan Mini Purse Seine di Perairan Pulau Mandangin, Sampan, Madura Skripsi Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 93 hal. Mallawa, A, Sudirman, M. Palo, dan Musbir 1991: Studi Mengenai Perikanan Bagan rambo di Perairan Barru Selat Makassa . Laporan Proyek Penelitian. Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Hasanuddin, Ujung Pandang. 40 hal. Martasuganda, S. 2002a. Jaring Insang (Gillnet). Serial Teknologi Penangkapan Ikan Benvawasan Lingkungan. Jurusan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan. Institut Pertanian
32~3A93
Martasuganda, S. 2002b. Set Net (teichi ami). Serial Teknologi Penangkapan Ikan Berwawasan Lingkungan. Jurusan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan. Institut Pertanian Bogor. 135 hal. Masyahoro,A., 1998. Pengaruh Teknik Pencahayaan Pada Perikanan Bagan Bagan (Liftnet) terhadap hasil Tangkapan di Perairan Teluk Perikanan Palu. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. 99 hal. Matayfel, B. P., and D.V. Radakav, 1965. Pola Tingkah Laku Ikan Sebagai Dasar Aplikasi dan Perencanaan Alat Penangkap. Alih bahasa oleh Wisnu Fakultas Perikanan dan Kelautan IPB. 46 hal. Gunarso. Matsuda, A, K, C. Amoka, T. Uyeno and T.Yoshiro., 1984. The Fishes Javanese Archipelago. Tokai University Press. Japan.
of
McCormack, C. A and B. Burnside. 1991. Effects of Circardian Phase on Cone Retinomotor Movement in Midas Cichlid. Exp.Eye Res. 52: 43 1 - 438. Mitsugi, S. 1974. Fish Lamps. In Fishing Gear and Methods. Text book for Marine Fisheries Research Course. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Government of Japan. p 209-240. Monintja, D.R. 1996. Teknologi Tepat Guna Dalam Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Hayati Laut: MenyambutEra Pasar Global. Makalah dalam seminar sehari Teknologi Lingkungan dan pengembangan Bisnis Masa Depan, diselenggarakan oleh kantor Menteri negara Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta. 13 hal. (Unpublish) Monintja, D. R. dan Yusfiandani, 2001. Prosiding Pelatihan untuk Pelatih Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Terpadu. Pusat Kajian Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Lautan. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Hal 45-57. Nadir, M., 2000. Teknologi Light Fishing di Perairan Barn Selat Makassar: Deskripsi, Sebaran Cahaya dan Hasil Tangkapan (Tidak dipublikasikan). Bogor. 87 hal. Tesis Program Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Nadir, M. M. F. A. Sondita and I. Jaya, 2001. Catch Comparison of Floating Platform Lift-Net (Bagan) According to Light Illumination and Lunar Phases of Barru Regency, South Sulawesi. . Proceeding of the JSPS Fisheries Sciences in Tropical Area; BogorInternational Symposium Indonesia Augt, 21-25, 2000 .Sustainable Fisheries in Asia in The New Millennium. Published by TUF International JSPS Project Vol.10. p 187-190. Najamuddin, M. N. Nessa., M. Palo, M.Yusran, Metusalach dan A. Assir., 1 994. Studi Penggunaan Lampu Neon Dalam Air Dengan Warna Yang berbeda Pada Perikanan Purse seine di Laut Flores Sulawesi Selatan.
BuletinIlmu Peternakan
Peternakan dan Perikanan Volume I1 (7). Fakultas dan Perikanan. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Selective Nasution, C., 1997. Industrial Shrimp Fishing and Application of Shrimp Fishing Gear in Indonesia, in Relation to Code of conduct for Responsible Fishing.. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Education and Training Program in Fishing Technology Past, Present and Future. Published by TUF JSPS Project. Tokyo. Japan. p 49-62. Nathanael, E. 1992. Study Report on Set Net Fishing in Japan and Consideration How Small Se nets Masu-ami and Choko-ami could be introduced to Cameroon. In Study Report Coastal Fishing Technology. KIFTC-JICA Japan. p.53. Nikonorov, I.V., 1975. Interaction of Fishing Gear With Fish Aggregations. Keter Publishing House. Jerusalem Ltd. Israel. 2 16p. Nicol, J. A. C. 1963. Some Aspects of Photoreception and Vision in fishes. Adv Mar.Bio1. 1:171-208. Nicol, J. A. C. 1989. The Eye of Fishes. Clarendon Press Oxport. P 308 Nikijuluw, V. P. H.2002. Rezim Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Penerbit P.T. Pustaka Cidesindo. Jakarta. 254.hal.
Perikanan.
Noakes and Baylis 1990. Methods for Fish Biology Edited by C.B.Schreck and Peter B. Moyle. American Fisheries Society Bethesda, Maryland, USA. p 684. Nur, D.M., M.Ahrnad.,dan H.Syandri., 1988. Pengaruh Kecepatan Arus dan Warna Cahaya Lampu Terhadap Tingkah Laku Ikan Bilis (Corica goniognathzis). Terubuk.XIV. No.42. Diterbitkan oleh Himpunan Alumni Fakultas Perikanan Universitas Riau. ha1 34-44 Nybakken, J.W., 1988. Biologi Laut. Suatu Pendekatan Ekologi. Alih Bahasa H.M.Eidman, dkk., Marine Biologi An Ecologycal approach. PT. Gramedia akarta. 549 hal. Okiyama, M, 1986. An Atlas of the Early Stage Fishes in Japan (in Javanese). Tokyo University Japan. 1154 p. Purbayanto, A., dan M. S. Baskoro., 1998. Tinjauan Singkat Tentang Pengembangan Teknologi Penangkapan Ikan Ramah Lingkungan. Mini Review on the Development of Environmental Friendly Fishing Technology. Proceeding AGRTBIOCHE. The Second Symposium on Agricultural Sciences and Biochemical Engineering. Tokyo p: 29-32
Radakov, D.V. 1973. Schooling in The Ecology of Fish. Translated from Russian by H.Mills. A Halsted Press Book. John Wiley and Sons. New York Toronto. Israel Program for Scientific Translations. JerusalemLandon. p. 172. Hierarchy Saaty, T. L. 1986. Decision Making For Leader: T he Analytical Process for Decision Complex World. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. (Terjemahan oleh Ir. Liana S). PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo. Jakarta. 270 hal. Sachlan, M. 1972. Planktonologi. Corespondence Center. Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan. Departement Pertanian jakarta. 103 hal. Sakakura, Y and K.Tsukamoto. 1997. Effect of Water Temperature and light Intensity on Aggressive Behaviuor in the Juvenile Yellowtail . Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 63(1): 42-45. Satria,A, A.Umbari., A. Fauzi., A. Purbayanto., E.Sutarto., I. Muchsin., I. Muflikhati., M. Karim., S. Saad.,W. Oktariza., adan 2. Imran. 2002. Menuju Desentralisasi Kelautan. Cidesindo. Pusat Kajian Agrarian IPB. Partneship for Goverment Reform in Indonesia. Jakarta. 2 10 hal Sawada, T. 1980. Fishes in Indonesia with illustration). Japan Cooperation Agency. Tokyo Japan. P 191.
International
Sedana, I.P. 1976. Studies on the Behaviour of Fish Towards Colored Light and Colored Net. Master Thesis. Laboratory of Fishing Methodology. Tokyo University of Fisheries Japan. p.74. Simbolon, D., D. R. Monintja, Widianingsih. 1994. Studi Tentang Light Fishing pada Perikanan Purse Seine di Perairan Sibolga, Sumatera Utara.Laporan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 66 hal. penelitian. Simbolon, D. 1995. Pemanfaatan Cahaya Lampu Listrik Sebagai Alat Bantu Penangkapan Ikan Pada Perikanan Purse Seine di Sibolga. MARITEK Vo1.5 No.1. Program Studi Ilmu Dan Teknologi Kelautan Fakultas Perikanan IPB. Hal 57-69. Sommer, C. W. Schneider and J.M. Poutiers., 1996. The Living Marine Resources of Somalia. FA0 Species Identification Field Guide For Fishery Purposes. FA0 of The United Nations. Rome. P 159-336. Sparre, P dan S.C.Venema, 1999. Introduksi Pengkajian Stock Ikan Tropis. Buku 1. Manual. Diterbitkan Berdasarkan Kerjasama dengan Organisasi Pangan dan Pertanian PBB, Oleh Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan, Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Jakarta. Hal 202-234.
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J.H., 1989. Prinsip dan Prosedure Statistika (suatu Gramedia, pendekatan biometrik). Alih bahasa B. Sumantry . P.T. Jakarta. 748.pp. Stobutzki, H. C., M. J. Miller., P. Jones., J. P.Salini. 2001. By-Catch diversity and Variation in a Tropical Australian Fishery; the implication for Monitoring. Fisheries Research 53 : 283 - 301. Subani, W., 1983. Penggunaan Lampu Sebagai Alat Bantu Penangkapan Ikan. Laporan Penelitian Perikanan Laut (Marine fisheries report).No 27. Balai Penelitian Perikanan Laut (Research Institute for marine fisheries ). Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan PertanianDeptan Jakarta. hal45-68. Subani,W., dan H. R. Barus, 1989. Alat Penagkapan Ikan dan Udang Laut. Jurnal (Edisi Khusus). Penelitian Perikanan Laut No. 50 tahun 1988 Jakarta. 248 hal. Sumargono. 1999. Studi Hasil Tangkapan Mini Purse Seine Dengan Menggunakan 6 Buah Lampu Petromaks di Perairan Binuangen, Jawa Barat. Skripsi Program Studi Malingping, Kabupaten Lebak, Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 37 ha1 Sulthan, M., 1985. Pengaruh Intensitas Cahaya Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Pada Bagan Tancap. Tesis Jumsan Perikanan Fakultas Peternakan Unhas. 49 ha1 Sudirman, M.S.Baskoro,S.Akiyama and T.Arimoto., 2000. Observation on Set net in Japan With Bibliographical Reviewing. Case Study in Tateyama Bay and Ishigaki (Okinawa Islands). Proceeding of the JSPS International Symposium Fisheries Sciences in Tropical Area; Bogor- Indonesia Agt, 19-21, 1999. .Sustainable Fishing Technology in Asia Toward the 21a. Published by TUF International JSPS Project Vol.8.March 2000.p 78-82. Light Sudirman., M.S.Baskoro, Zulkarnain, S.Akiyama and T.Arimoto., 2001. Adaptation Process of Jack Mackerel (Trachumsjaponicus) by different Light Intensities and Water Temperatures. Proceeding of the JSPS International Symposium Fisheries Sciences in Tropical Area; BogorIndonesia Agt, 21-25, 2000 .Sustainable Fisheries in Asia in The New Millennium. Published by TUF International JSPS Project Vol.10. p 205-208. Sudjana. 1992. Metode Statistika. Edisi ke 5. Penerbit Tarsito Bandung. 508. Hal. Suherman, A. 2002. Analisis Hasil Tangkapan Mini Purse Seine Menggunakan Jurnlah lampu yang Berbeda. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana, IPB. Bogor. 75 hal.
Sutyawan, F., 1999. Pengoperasian Purse Seiner Menggunakan Cahaya Dan Rumpon Sebagai Pemikat Ikan Serta Sonar Sebagai Alat Pendeteksi Ikan. Skripsi Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor. 37 hal. Ta'alidin, Z., 2000. Pemanfaatan Lampu Listrik Dalam Upaya peningkatan Hasil Tangkapan Pada Bagan Apung Tradisional di Pelabuhan Ratu. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana Instutut Pertanian Bogor. 92 hal. Tham, A. K., 1965. Notes on the Biology of the Anchovy, Stolephorus pseudoheterolobus Handerberg. Bull. Nat. Mus. Singapura 33 (4):23-26. Tokai,T and T. Kitahara. 1989. Methods of Determining the Mesh Selectivity Curve of Trawl Net. Journal Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi: 55(4);643-649 p. Tokai, T. 1999. Maximum likelihood Parameter Estimates of a Mesh Selectivity logistic Model through Solver and ES-Excel. Tokai,T and Y.Fujimori, 2000. Estimation of Gillnet Selectivity Curve By Kitahara's Method With Solver on MS-Exel. Proceeding of the JSPS International Symposium Fisheries Sciences in Tropical Area; BogorIndonesia Agt, 21-25, 2000 .Sustainable Fisheries in Asia in The New Millennium. Published by TUF International JSPS Project Vol. 1O.p 93-97. Tiews, K. 1.A.Ronquilloand L.M.Santos, 1970. On the Biology of Anchovies (Stolephorus Lacepede) in Philippines waters. Proc.Indo.Indo.Facific. Fish.Counc,l2(2): 1-25 Tupamahu, A. M. S. Baskoro, I. Jaya dan D. R. Monintja, 200 1. Komparasi Adaptasi Retina Ikan Tembang (Surdinella fimbrzata) dan Ikan Selar (Selar crumenopthaImus) yang tertarik dengan cahaya lampu. Bulletin PSP; V(X) No. 1. Jurusan PSP. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan IPB. Von Brandt, A.. 1985. Fish Catching Methods of the World. Third Edition. Fishing News Books Ltd. Farnham. P.418. Wagner, H.J. 1990. Retinal Sructure of Fish, in The Visual System of Fish. Edited by Ron H. Douglas and M.B.A. Djamgoz. Published by Chapman and hall Ltd. London. p 110-157. Walpole, R.E. 1997. Pengantar Statistika. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta. Walpole, R.E. dan R. H. Myers. 1995. Ilmu Peluang dan Statistika untuk Insinyur dan Ilmuwan. ITB (Edisi 4), Bandung. Widodo, J. 1988. Population Dynamics and Management of "Ikan Layang" , Scad Mackerel Decapterus spp (Pisces:Carangidae) In the Java sea. Dissertation of Philosophy. University of Washington. 150p.
Wisudo, S. H., H. Sakai.,S. Takeda., S. Akiyama and T. Arimoto. 2002. Total Lumen Estimation of Fishing Lamp by Means of Rousseau Diagram Analysis with Lux Measurement. Proceedings of International Commerative Symposium 70th Anniversary of the Javanese Society of Fisheries Science. Fisheries Sciences Tokyo.(68):479-480. Woodhead, P. M. J. 1966. The Behaviour of Fish in Relation to the Light in The Sea. Eceanogr. Mar. Biol.Ann. Rev.4: 337- 403. Horald Barnes Edition. Ye, Y. A.H.Alsaffar., M.A. Mohammed. 2000. By-Catch and Discard of Kuwait Shrimp Fishery. Fisheries Research. 45: 9-19. Zarohchrnan, 1992. Some Studies on Set net Fishery in Japan. In Study Report Coastal Fishing Technology. KIFTC-JlCA Japan. p. 53. Respon of Zhang, X. M., T. Arimoto, and M. Inoue. 1989. Retinomotor Journal of The Tokyo Jack Makerel Trachurusjaponicus to strobe light. University of Fisheries.76:(1-2): 65-72. heno ouyou Zhang, X.M. 1992. Gyorui no shikakuseiri to toro-ru gyohou ni kansuru kenkyu. Dr. thesis, Tokyo University of Fisheries, Tokyo, p 270 (in Japanese).
APPENDIX
Appendix 1 Map of Sulawesi Island showing experimental site and data collection.
*
119°20y00"BT
119°30'00"
Makassar
Strait
were
119O40'W
Fishing ground of bagan rambo
Sources Dehidros TNI At 1989 No 123
L Scale : 1 :200,000.-
253
Appendix 2. Criteria of gonad maturity stage of anchovy used during the experiment (ARer Tiews et al. (1968) vide Hutomo et. al, (1987)
Gonad maturity stage
Immature
2
II Quiet stage
3
I11 Preparation stage
IV Atfiliation stage
v Development stage
6
VI Mature
Male
Female
The small testis Ovary is transparent, bold, small transparent and with have compact wall. The unseen with naked eye. Transparent, uncoloured polygonal under the microscope
The small testis Translucent, red colour, clear with eggs in transparent and compact wall. The grey to red colour polygonal form under microscope Testis opaque, a Ovary opaque, colour ranging from lot of containing orange to bright red. Size measure bigger than at stage 11, but less be blood artery. compact, a lot of vein. The egg can be seen with naked eye.
Testis is short, red until white colour, compact wall. Single of blood artery to be clear Testis opaque, long, wall compact. If depressed will go out white dilution
Colour testis white -yellow. If depressed will go out white dilution.
The eggs colour orange to red. Transparent, yolk development
Ovary opaque, white to redish, a lot of venous wall. Content is very compact. The circular egg was obtained.
Ovary translucent, red colour. Ovary contains separate egg, to go out with soft pressure. All of the eggs is transparent.
Continuation Appendix 2
Male
Female
No
Gonad maturity stage
7
VII Testis is white The ovary is diffuse wall. Full of Di&se vein. A lot of tissue solid Half spawning colour. wall and soften. If depressed white dilution will exit
8
The testis of part Ovary transparent, reddish, wall is of backside is very diffuse. A few contain eggs. Some times similar with stage I1 shrink.
VIII Spawning
Appendix 3 Criteria of gonad maturity stage of Russell's scad and Indian Mackerel used during the experiment ( after Effedie and Subardja (1 977) vide Effendie, 1979)
Male
Female
No
Gonad maturity stage
1
I Immature
Testis like yarn, short Testis like yarn, long to front of and clear colour body cavity. Clear colour and slippery surface.
2
I1 Development
Size of testis is bigger, The size of ovary is bigger. . milky white coloration, Yellowish. The eye not yet been clearer form from stage I seen with eye.
3
I11 Mature
The surface testis is Ovary is yellow colour. In jagged. Colour turn morphology of egg looked to be its item with eye. white. Testis bigger.
4
IV Half spawning
Like at stage I11 of Ovary is big, the egg is yellow, clearer visible. Testis is easy to dissociated. Filling % 213 stomach cavity. solid
5
V Post spawning
Testis of Backside is Ovary is wrinkle, thick wall A lot of egg like stage 11. deflated.
Appendix 4 Design of bagan rambo used during the experiment in Makassar Strait (front of view)
io w r
CL.*PU
Orhr".,
",AWL.
.I...
O5NCI.
Irrr,.
u uew. .p
t.,
I.'..
.P, LILY />,
,,
..A
A.
,
8.
.0'
el;'
",.I.
.IS"
.>*.1
R%r
,,..
.
lil-
I-
,.
,,.".,
F.. . r
i*..
'
La.'-
'.
...
,, ... ,.,
. , .,
"A*
il%,
,u.e
,at,..:
.
. ..
h.,"
.
Appendix 5. Design of bagan mlnbo used during the experiment in Makassar Strait (top of view )
KETEI?/~NG/~N ,.,...I
"1M.
H l Y l 0.l. 11IAUO 0.Wll
<-
II... ,It.*.
LO.
.,I*
XI
L I I
.,.e
s
L,,",
8"I ' L L 3 n 0 :* 1117-
'
..,'I
W I N
l".c
n.n-
8
L
@.C I . "u
-.
,,A*,.
Appendix 6. Result of light intensity measurement for every mercury bulb used by the bagan rambo fishermen in Makassar strait
Appendix 7. Result of light intensity measurement ( in laboratory) for mercury bulb (250 W, white and yellow colour) by using lamp shade and without lamp shade in the air at distance 1 m from the bulb
I :"
:;"
A. Merkury bulb, 250 W (White colour) I I With lamr, shade tM ;re2; Light inten~i;;;~ (lux)
Without lamp shade Light intensitas (lux)
Continuation of Appendix 7
B. Merbry bulb, 250 W (Yellow colour) No
Measurement Angle (degree)
1 1
0
With lamp shade Light intensitas (lux) 2920
Without lamp shade Light intensitas (lux) 722
Appendix 8. Result of light illumination measurement ( Lux) at side of the rambo
bagan
Appendix 9. Result of light illumination measurement ( Lux) at behind the bagan rambo
No
Depth (m)
0
Distance from the boat bagan (m) 10 1 30 20 5 Illumination (Lux)
1
0
26
12
5
2
2
1
0.5
2
1
24
8
4
1
1
0.5
0.2
3
2
24
3
3
1
1
0.2
0
21
20
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
21
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
22
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
23
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
24
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
25
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
26
0.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
40
1
50
Appendix 10. Result of light illumination measurement (lux) under the bagan rambo platform Distance from the middle of the boat bagan (m) Depth
5.15
7.2
15.5
light illumination (lux)
0
150
130
100
I
130
120
80
2
90
110
80
3
80
100
70
4
60
80
60
5
50
60
50
6
40
50
50
7
30
40
40
8
25
30
25
9
29
20
24
10
26
23
22
11
22
22
19
12
20
18
17
13
17
15
15
14
15
13
13
15
12
12
11
16
10
9
10
17
8
7
8
18
7
6
7
19
6
5
7.5
20
5
4
6
21
4
3
5
22
3
2.5
4.5
23
2
2
4
24
2
1.5
3.5
25
1
1
3
26
1
0.7
2
Appendix 1 1 . Photograph A: Image of recording fish distribution under the hcrgcrn platform (indicated arrow) and B: underwater camera and others tools used during underwater observation in h ~ r g ~ rcmlbo n~
Infrared underwater camera
Appendix 12. Total catch of each hauling time during the experiment
Trip 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Moon phase in Arabic
3 24 30 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 5 6 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22
Jumadil Awal Jumadil Awal Jumadil Awal Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Jumadil Akhir Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal Rabiul Awal
Total catch/Hauling (kg) I I1 I11 Before Around After midnight midnight midnight 679.00 435.00 579.00 270.00 820.00 435.00 203.00 130.50 1352.00 189.00 190.00 729.00 93.50 39.00 758.00 544.00 262.50 275.00 378.00 418.50 1139.00 225.00 148.30 65.00 49.00 425.00 297.00 540.00 169.00 425.00 91 .OO 338.00 338.00 108.00 740.00 416.00 260.00 182.00 369.00 104.00 1278.00 1550.00 364.00 1377.00 270.00 216.00 294.00 399.00 152.00 62.50 81.50 1930.00 2062.00 1964.00 1779.00 1529.00 406.00 65.00 91.00 644.00 594.50 116.00 796.00 377.00 1027.00 595.00 154.00 1144.00 105.00 135.00 232.00 460.00 36.00 55.50 38.00 158.50 213.50 208.50 420.50 396.00 284.50 528.00 373.00 933.00 345.00 83 1.OO 3 19.00 390.00 21.50 709.00 870.00
Continuation Appendix 12
Trip
Total catchhlauling (kg) Moon phase in Arabic I Before midnight
I11 ARer midnight
I1 Around midnight
37
23
Rabiul Awal
1058.00
493.00
203.00
38
24
Rabiul Awal
384.00
203.00
4 19.00
39
25
Rabiul Awal
580.00
-
532.00
40
26
Rabiul Awal
436.00
253.50
102.50
41
27
Rabiul Awal
244.50
407.00
124.50
42
28
Rabiul Awal
385.00
-
640.00
43
3
Rabiul Akhir
240.00
-
75.00
44
4
Rabiul Akhir
736.00
187.50
900.00
45
8
Rabiul Akhir
377.00
-
290.00
46
9
Rabiul Akhir
3 19.00
21.50
116.00
47
10
Rabiul Akhir
174.00
-
203.00
48
12
Rabiul Akhir
190.00
60.00
-
21 145.00
11192.00
23815.00
x
469.90
329.176
553 84
Sd
426.10
264.29
521.38
45
34
43
B i
n
Appendix 13. Total catch of each hauling time during full moon in bagan rambo Moon ohase in Arabic
TRIP
Total catchJHauling (Kg) I I1 I11 Before Around After midnight midnight midnight 189.00 190.00 1352.00
81 Jumadil Akhir 91 Jumadil Akhir I
TI
10/ Jumadil Akhir
Jumadil Akhir 1 2 Jumadil Akhir
1
13 Jumadil Akhir 141 ~umadilAkhir I
191 Jumadil Akhir I
201 Jumadil Akhir I
13
1
I
21 / Jumadil Akhir
I
I
I
338.001
338.001
108.00
26
11 Rabiul Awal
377.00
796.00
1027.00
27
12 Rabiul Awal
154.00
595.00
1144.00
28
13 Rabiul Awal
102.00
-
135.00
29
14 Rabiul Awal
232.00
-
460.00
30
15 Rabiul Awal
55.50
36.00
38.00
31
16 Rabiul Awal
158.50
208.50
213.50
32
17 Rabiul Awal
420.50
396.00
-
33
18 Rabiul Awal
284.50
528.00
-
34
19 Rabiul Awal
373.00
933.50
345.00
35
20 Rabiul Awal
83 1.OO
319.00
390.00
45
8 Rabiul Akhir
377.00
-
290.00
46
9 Rabiul Akhir
3 19.00
21.50
116.00
47
10 Rabiul Akhir
174.00
-
203 .OO
48
12 Rabiul Akhir
190.00
60.00
-
6910.50 300.46 192.95 23
6563.50 364.64 325.46 18
8385.00 419.25 375.85 20
zx x Sd n
Appendix 14 . Total catch of each hauling time during the new moon in bagan rambo during the experiment Trip No
Moon phase in Arabic
1
3 Jumadil Awal
679.00
435 .OO
957.00
2
24 Jumadil Awal
900.00
270.00
820 .OO
3
30 Jumadil Awal
203 .OO
130.50
435.00
14
22 Jumadil Akhir
740.00
416.00
260.00
15
23 Jumadil Akhir
182.00
16
24 Jurnadil Akhir
17
1423 Hijriah
Total catch/Hauling (Kg) I 11 111 Before Around After midnight midnight midnight
104.OO
-
1278.00
25 Jumadil Akhir
-
364.00
1550.00
18
26 Jumadil Akhir
216.00
270.00
1377.00
19
27 Jumadil Akhir
399.00
-
294.00
20
2 8 Jumadil Akhir
8 1.50
62.50
152.00
21
29 Jumadil Akhir
1930.00
-
2062.00
22
1 Rabiul Awal
1779.00
-
1964.00
23
2 Rabiul Awal
1529.00
406.00
-
24
5 Rabiul Awal
-
65 .OO
9 1.OO
25
6 Rabiul Awal
594.50
644 .OO
116.00
36
22 Rabiul Awal
870.00
21.50
709.00
37
23 Rabiul Awal
1058.00
493 .OO
203 .OO
38
24 Rabiul Awal
348.00
203.00
4 19.00
39
25 Rabiul Awal
580.00
-
532.00
40
26 Rabiul Awal
436.00
253.50
102.50
41
27 Rabiul Awal
244.50
407.00
124.50
42
28 Rabiul Awal
385.00
640.00
43
3 Rabiul Akhir
240.00
-
44
4 Rabiul Akhir
736.00
187.50
900.00
14234.50
4628.50
15430.00
X
647.02
289.28
670.87
Sd
534.67
174.39
605.12
n
22
16
23
EX
369.00
75 .OO
L
Continuation Appendix 15.
No
Genus
Species
Local name
Indonesian Percent Genera name
("A)
Percent Species
("A)
29 Aluterus
29.1 Aluterus sp
Papakkulu
Ikan platu
0.040
0.040
30 Pseudobalistis
30.1 Pseudobalistis SP
Papakkulu
Ikan platu
0.040
0.040
0.040
31 Siganus 3 1.1 S. virgatus
Baronang
Baronang
0.020
kuning 3 1.2 S. canaliculatus Baronang
Linglus
0.020
Buntal
0.016
0.016
Buntal duri
0.130
0.013
Gemrni
IkanGemih
0.013
0.013
Manriwasa
Bawd putih
0.010
0.010
Rambeng
0.010
0.010
Butte
32 Arothron
32.1 A. hispidas
33 Diodon
33.1 D. holacanthus Butte
34 Echeneis
34.1 Echenies
naucrates 35 Pampus
35.1 P. argenteus
36 Diptetygonosus 36.1 Dipterygonosus Geranggang
sp 37 Formio
37.1 F. niger
Manriwasa
Bawd hitam
0.007
0.007
38 Lactoria
38.1 L. cornuta
Butte
Buntal
0.004
0.004
0.200
0.020
0.004
0.004
100
100
tanduk 39 Rabdania
39.1 Rabdania sp
Samu-samu
40 Octopus
40.1 Octopus sp
Gurita
Total Genus = 40
Total species = 59
Gurita
Total
Appendix 15. Species composition of the bagan rambo in Makassar strait during the experiment No
Genus
Species
Local name
Indonesian name
1 Stelophorus 1.1 S. insularis
Lure lotong
Teri hitam
1.2 S. buccaneri
Lure cella
Teri
1.52
1.3 S. heterolobus
Lure pute
Teri
0.92
1.4 S. indicus
Lure cidu
Teri
0.30
1.5 S. tri
Lure leppa
Teri
0.15
2 Decapterus 2.1 D. ressulli
Gappo lajang
Layang
2.2. D. macrosoma
Gappo lajang
Layang deles
3.2 R. neglectus
7.86
Gappo banyara Kembung lelaki Gappo banyara Kembung perempuan
14.48 3.62 7.19
4 Selar 4.1 S.crume nopthalmus 5.1 S. leptolepis
Katombong
Selar bentong
4.82
Suliri
Selar kuning
2.23
6.1 Megalaspis cordyla
Commo-commo Selar tetengkek
0.14 7.10
7 Sardinella
8 Dussumieria
18.34
18.10 3.1 R. kanagurta
6 Megalaspis
27.60
26.20
3 Rastrellrger
5 Selaroides
Percent Percent Genera Species (%) (?A) 30.49
7.1 S. Firnbriata
Tembang
Tembang
4.80
7.2 Sardinella sp
Tembang masa Tembang
2.13
7.3 S. sirm
Simbula
Sardin
8.1 Dussumieria acuta
Jampu-jampu
Japuh
0.17 3.10
3.10
2.41
9 Loligo 9.1 L. edulis
Cumi
Cumi-cumi
1.56
9.2 L. duvaucelli
Cumi taropong Cumi-cumi
0.48
9.3 L. chinensis
Cumi pai
Cumi-cumi
0.19
10 Sebroteithis
10.1 S. lessoniana
Cumi batu
Cumi-cumi
0.12
11 Architeuthis
11.1 Architeuthis sp
Curni luttu
CumicUmi
0.06
Continuation Appendix 15. No
Genus
Species
Local name
Indonesian Percent Genera name
(%I 1.57
12 Leiognathus 12.1 L. aureus
Bete-bete
Peperek
1.02
12.2 L. berbis
Bete-bete
Peperek
0.39
12.3 L. blochii
Bete-bete
Peperek
0.16 1.31
13 Sphyraena 13.1 S. genie
Asa bari
Alu-alu
0.76
13.2 S. jello
Asa pute
Mu-alu
0.32
13.3 S. obtusata
Loli
Kucul
0.23
Ikan bulan
1.13
1.13
Cakalang
Cakalang
0.22
0.22
Tinumbu
Tenggiri
0.16
0.16
Lasocina
Beloso laut
0.13
0.13
0.10
0.10
14 Mene
14.1 Mene maculata Bete rakkapeng
15 Katsuwonus
15.1 K. pelamis
16 Scomberomorus 16.1 S. commerson
17 Saurida
Percent Species (%)
17.1 S. tumbil
18 Upeneus 18.1 U. molluccensis Cikociko
Biji nangka
0.06
Cikociko
Biji nangka
0.05
18.2 U. tragula
Ikan terbang
0.08
0.08
Tongkol
Tongkol
0.08
0,08
2 1.1 Anomalops sp
Ambon-ambon
0.07
0.07
22.1 T. crocodilus
Temo
Ikan leweri batu Cendro
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.03
19 Cypsilurus
19.1 C. poecilopterus Tarowani
20 Auxis
20.1 A. thazard
2 1 Anomalops 22 Tylosurus
23 Hemirhamphus 23.1 H. far
Orasa
24 Therapon
24.1 T. theraps
Kerung-kerung
25 Mvripristis
25.1 M. adustus
Kampulen
Julungjulung Kerongkerong Bulan merah
0.05
26 Caesio 26.1 C. coerulaureus Sinrili 26.2 C. chtysozona
Sinrili
26.3 C. erythrogaster Cella-cella
Lolosi biru
0.02
Lolosi merah
0.02
Ekor kuning
0.01
27 Trichiurus
27.1 T. savala
Lajuru
Lay
0.05
0.05
28 Atropus
28.1 A. atropus
Cepacepa
Cipa-cipa
0.04
0.04
Appendix 16. Species diversity for every hauling time during the experiment Species diversity/Hauling Trip
Moon phase (in Arabic)
1
3 Jumadil Awal
I (Before midnight) 16
2
24 Jumadil Awal
17
22
17
3
30 Jumadil Awal
18
22
16
4
8 Jumadil Akhir
14
18
11
5
9 Jumadil Akhir
-
15
15
6
10 Jumadil Akhir
19
10
14
7
11 Jumadil Akhir
15
-
12
8
12 Jumadil Akhir
12
12
8
9
13 Jumadil Akhir
16
12
-
10
14 Jumadil Akhir
12
-
11
11
19 Jumadil Akhir
21
23
19
12
20 Jumadil Akhir
13
17
10
13
2 1 Jumadil Akhir
29
27
14
14
22 Jumadil Akhir
23
26
23
15
23 Jumadil Akhir
20
14
16
24 Jumadil Akhir
22
-
20
17
25 Jumadil Akhir
-
19
19
18
26 Jumadil Akhir
23
20
14
19
27 Jumadil Akhir
14
-
15
20
28 Jumadil Akhir
19
20
14
21
29 Jumadil Akhir
11
10
22
1 Rabiul Awal
13
-
23
2 Rabiul Awal
15
14
-
24
5 Rabiul Awal
-
16
11
25
11
13
9
26
61I Rabiul Awal 1 1 Rabiul Awal
24
i7
14
27
121 Rabiul Awd
9
14
17
28
131 Rabid Awal
11
-
10
I1 (Around midnight) 17
111 (After midnight) 12
9
Continuation Appendix 16. I
-
Moon phase (in Arabic)
Trip
29 30
I
I
Species diversity/Hauling I (Before midnight)
-
II (Around midnight)
III
(After midnight)
-
141 Rabiul Awal
19
-
13
1 5/ Rabiul Awal
8
12
4
15
12
10
20
21
I
31
16 j Rabiul Awal I
33
1 8 Rabiul Awal
24
17
-
34
19 Rabiul Awal
13
'1 1
10
35
20 Rabid Awal
23
22
12
36
221 Rabiul Awa1
19
15
9
37
23 / Rabiul Awal
14
11
9
23
21
22
32
171 Rabiul Awal I
I
38
241 Rabiul Awa.
39
25 Rabid Awal
20
-
19
40
26/ Rabiul Awal
24
20
24
41
271 Rabiul Awal
26
26
18
42
28 Rabiul Awal
18
-
19
43
3 Rabid Akhir
16
-
17
44
41 Rabiul Akhir
20
23
15
18
-
20
15
17
13
I
~
I
45
i
8 Rabid Akhir 1
46
91 Rabid ~ k h i r I
47
101 Rabiul Akhir
19
-
15
48
12;Rabiul Akhir
14
17
-
EX
785
599
607
X
17
18
14
n
45
34
,
-
I
43
Appendix 17. Total catch for dominant species caught by bagan mmbo according to the hauling time Table 1. During the experiment
strip sardine) 7 CumiCumi (Squids) 8 Lain-lain (Others) Total
357.0
304.5
683.0
1.69
2.72
2.87
1344.5
2.39
1163.5
740.0
1097.0
5.50
6.61
4.61
3000.5
5.34
21145.0
11192.0
23815.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
56152.0
100.0
Table 2. During the full moon
Continuation Appendix 17
Table 3. During the new moon
I1 = Hauling around midnight I11 = Hauling after midmght
Continuation Appendix 18. r
Ncl Dates
14 kW
15kW
15.5kW
16.25 kW 18.25 kW 20kW
28
28-6-02
862.5
225.0
187.7
274.5
337.5
143.7
29
29-6-02
562.5
254.4
150.0
279.9
206.3
262.5
30
30-6-02
150.0
301.8
150.0
3 18.6
225.0
131.2
31
1/7/02
75.0
413.9
225.0
380.9
750.0
406.2
32
2/7/02
600.0
335.7
412.5
654.0
300.0
493.8
33
3/7/02
450.0
579.1
375.0
481.5
412.5
171.3
34
4/7/02
300.0
455.4
525.0
730.0
1237.5
275.0
35
5/7/02
1200.0
499.3
270.0
667.4
637.5
225.0
36
6/7/02
450.0
656.3
337.5
837.0
635.0
140.0
37
7/7/02
600.0
748.5
693.7
831.0
281.2
545.0
38
8/7/02
187.5
339.1
2100
472.5
525.0
543.8
39
9/7/02
450.0
559.3
600.0
1089.0
750.0
212.3
40
10/7/02
187.5
367.5
225.0
1030.0
525.0
537.5
41
11/7/02
525.0
500.9
43 1.2
400.0
750.0
343.0
42
12/7/02
662.5
760.9
337.5
622.0
1050.0
243.7
43
13-7-02
262.5
57 1.4
937.5
964.5
1425.0
193.7
44
14-7-02
225.0
576.7
1012.5
916.5
937.5
125.0
45
15-7-02
300.0
1226.8
675.0
907.5
937.5
200.3
46
16-7-02
375.0
653.6
300.0
1875.0
675.0
343.3
47
17-7-02
375.0
684.6
393.7
603.6
750.0
457.5
48
18-7-02
300.0
458.6
450.0
742.5
525.0
412.5
49
19-7-02
412.5
675.8
450.0
747.5
975.0
375.0
50
20-7-02
750.0
358.9
300.0
5 10.0
937.5
704.0
51
21-7-02
337.5
533.1
525.5
780.0
468.7
501.0
52
22-7-02
187.5
514.3
356.3
866.2
150.0
391.5
53
23-7-02
637.5
460.7
206.2
468.0
1050.0
612.5
54
24-7-02
187.5
423.2
262.5
616.2
1462.5
266.7
55
25-7-02
712.5
450.0
262.5
600.0
618.7
406.2
56
26-7-02
187.5
583.4
202.5
2378.6
431.2
143.8
57
29-7/02
150.0
288.3
112.5
410.0
600.0
170.0
24231.2
31239.7
27285.9
49228.1
Total
45485.5 22564.3
Appendix 19. Average of total catch (kg) of baga~zrambo by different lighting power (kW) during the new moon No
14 kW
Dates
15 kW
15.5 kW 16.25 kW 18.25 kW
20 kW
1
1/6/02
412.5
591.3
513.7
623.7
5400.0
543.8
2
2/6/02
375.0
383.0
975.0
593.2
225.0
737.3
3
3/6/02
300.0
285.8
75.0
779.8
450.0
789.4 -
-
-
4
4/6/02
600.0
550.0
1275.0
750.0
262.5
365.6
5
5/6/02
525.0
851.8
847.5
750.0
450.0
452.0
6
6/6/02
450.0
557.1
1135.0
1785.0
375.0
227.5
7
7/6/02
600.0
1224.1
675.0
1305.0
787.0
477.5
8
8/6/02
525.0
415.2
697.5
1387.5
337.5
425.0
9
9/6/05
150.0
485.3
301.5
1092.4
768.7
522.7
10
10/6/02
750.0
474.6
262.5
191.2
918.7
471.2
11
11/6/02
375.0
479.5
375.0
1132.5
375.0
418.7
12
12/6/20
675.0
618.7
412.6
890.6
1182.5
240.3
13
13/6/02
525.0
407.7
345.0
1168.8
525.0
462.5
14
14 16/02
975.0
1248.9
450.0
1900.2
675.0
906.2
15
15/6/02
112.5
444.6
112.5
871.2
375.0
550.0
16
16/6/02
450.0
451.1
825.0
366.5
2700.0
962.5
17
17/6/02
112.5
334.7
133.5
1218.7
600.0
702.5
18
2/7/02
600.0
335.7
412.5
654.0
300.0
493.8
19
3/7/02
450.0
579.1
375.0
481.5
412.5
171.3
Continuation Appendix 19
No
Dates
14 kW
15 kW
15.5 kW 16.25 kW 18.25 kW
20 kW
20
4/7/02
300.0
455.4
525.0
730.0
1237.5
275.0
21
5/7/02
1200.0
499.3
270.0
667.4
637.5
225.0
22
6/7/02
450.0
656.3
337.5
837.0
635.0
140.0
23
7/7/02
600.0
748.5
693.7
83 1.O
281.2
545.0
24
8/7/02
187.5
339.1
2100.0
472.5
525.0
543.8
25
9/7/02
450.0
559.3
600.0
1089.0
750.0
212.3
26
10/7/02
187.5
367.5
225.0
1030.0
525.0
537.5
27
11/7/02
525.0
500.9
431.2
400.0
750.0
343.0
28
12/7/02
662.5
760.9
337.5
622.0
1050.0
243.7
29
13/7/02
262.5
571.4
937.5
964.5
1425.0
193.7
30
14/7/02
225.0
576.7
1012.5
916.5
937.5
125.0
31
15/7/02
300.0
1226.8
675.0
907.5
937.5
200.3
32
16/7/02
375.0
653.6
300.0
1875.0
675.0
343.3
Appendix 20. Average of total catch (Kg) of bagan rambo by different lighting power (kW) during the full moon Dates
No
14 kW
15 kW
15.5
16.25 kW 18.25 kW
20kW
1
18/6/02
900.0
1526.8
862.5
1365.0
825.0
358.7
2
19/6/02
375.0
562.5
581.3
1965.0
2437.5
840.2
3
20/6/02
300.0
832.5
375.0
945.0
825.0
308.7
4
21/6/02
375.0
495.5
450.0
849.5
412.5
412.5
5
22-6-02
450.0
591.9
712.5
622.5
675.0
268.7
6
23/6/02
375.0
535.7
487.5
1920.9
525.0
200.0
7
24/6/02
150.0
403.7
187.5
577.5
1012.5
400.0
8
25/6/02
112.5
340.6
225.0
772.5
862.5
193.8
9
26/6/02
225.0
403.1
331.5
585.0
712.5
175.0
10
27/6/02
393.7
287.5
195.0
364.5
225.0
175.0
11
28/6/02
862.5
225.0
187.7
274.5
337.5
143.7
12
29/6/02
562.5
254.4
150.0
279.9
206.3
262.5
13
30/6/02
150.0
301.8
150.0
318.6
225.0
131.2
14
17/7/02
375.0
684.6
393.7
603.6
750.0
457.5
15
18/7/02
300.0
458.6
450.0
742.5
525.0
412.5
16
19/7/02
412.5
675.8
450.0
747.5
975.0
375.0
17
20/7/02
750.0
358.9
300.0
510.0
937.5
704.0
18
21/7/02
337.5
533.1
525.5
780.0
468.7
501.0
19
22/7/02
187.5
514.3
356.3
866.2
150.0
391.5
20
23/7/02
637.5
460.7
206.2
468.0
1050.0
612.5
21
24/7/02
187.5
423.2
262.5
616.2
1462.5
266.7
22
25/7/02
712.5
450.0
262.5
600.0
618.7
406.2
23
26/7/02
187.5
583.4
202.5
2378.6
431.2
143.8
29/7/02
150.0
288.3
112.5
410.0
600.0
170.0
24 I
Appendix 2 1. Tendency of the species preference by different lighting power
Species
-
2000
Catch Ranking Ck_g)
Teit 1.m ane
-
1500
Kernburr$
-
'ckr
an0 Fcru bdri* Idptttl
500
t'un~i-tkr1n t
-
L au~-iaill
0 14
I55
15
$ 6 25
18 2 5
20
Lighting p o cr~ (kW)
"i Kembung (Mack
! 1
!
_--- -_--+-.
i
IOOi
I f4
/-,
_
rp---__
15
--.
,/',
15 5
..-_A
_ _ \
Cumltuml (sq
l-..
\I
-16.25
Japuh (rounp
$8 25
Lighting power Tk W )
20
tatn-lain (ofhet
Appendix 22. Statistical test result for analyzing significantly different among the different lighting powers Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable
Catch
1 Sig.
Tukey HSD
Based on 0 b ~ e ~ means. ed '.The mean dierence is significant at the .05 level.
.011 967 ,000 .000 1.000 .011 ,115 ,000 .531
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound -.282016
I
Continuation Appendix 22. Catch Subset INTENS Tukey HSDJ 6
1 3 2 5 4
N
57 57 57 57 56 57
Sig. Duncana,bVc 6
1 3
2 5 4 Sig.
57 57 57 57 56 57
1 2 3 4 2.538606 2.550013 2.586758 2.586758 2.702104 2.702104 2.779990 2.779990 2.892828 ,899 .I16 .528 ,133 2.538606 2.550013 2.586758 2.702104 2.779990 2.892828 ,324 .088 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type Ill Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 5.924E-02. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 56.831. b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. c. Alpha = .05.
Appendix 23 Transparency and current speed relation to the total catch every hauling during the experiment
Continuation Appendix 23
Continuation Appendix 23
Continuation Appendix 23
Catch No
Hauling
Dates
Transp arency (m)
(ds)
5m
36
37
38
39
14/6/2002
15/6/2002
16/6/2002
-
Water depth (m)
Current speed
10 m
Basket
Kg
I I1
16.5
0.068
0.080
8.0 240.0 Unhauled
61.0
I11
14.5
0.094
0.089
2.5
75.0
61.0
I
18.0
0.095
0.074
8.0
240.0
61.0
11
-
-
-
I11
18.0
0.064
0.088
30.0
900.0
61.0
I
18.0
0.046
0.056
13.0
377.0
50.0
II
18.0
0.049
0.054
42.0
1218.0
50.0
I11
18.0
0.060
0.050
6.0
1392.0
50.0
I
16.5
0.084
0.096
5.5
154.0
50.0
16.5
0.076
0.088
5.0
140.0
67.0
14.5
0.060
0.068
12.0 1244.0
67.0
17/6/2002
I11
-
-
-
Unhauled
Appendix 24. Stomach content of the dominat fish in bagarz ranzbo
A.Big eye scad (S.crumenopthalm~cs) No
Stomach
Species
contains
1
Teri (StoZephorus insularis), kembung
Fish
(Rastralliger kangurta) 2
Crustacea
Udang rebon (Asetea sp)
3
Mollusca
Cumi-cumi (squids)
4
Plankton
a. Fitoplankton
- Cyanophyta (Colotrix sp) - Diatomae ( ~ l l a s i o t r i xNintzhia, , Dan Chaetocheros) b. Zooplankton
- Ciliata (Dileptus; paramaecium) - Rhizopoda (Arcella dm Trigonophxis) - Rotaria (Brancionus dan Karatella)
B. Indian mackerel
Stomach contains
No 1
(Rastralliger kangurta)
Fish
Species Teri (Stolephorus sp), Layang (Decapterus ruselli)
2
Crustacea
Shripm (Asetea sp)
3
Mollusca
Curni-cumi (squids)
Continuation Appendix 24. Stomach contains
No 4
Plankton
Species
a. Fitoplankton -Cyanophyta (Colotrix sp) (Thallasiotrix,
-Diatomae
Nintzhia,
Surilella
and
Chaetocheros)
c. Zooplankton
- Ciliata (Dileptus; paramecium) -Rhizopoda
(Arcella
and
Trigonophxis)
- Rotaria (Brancionusand Karatella)
C. Russells' scad (Decapterus ruselli) No 1
Species
Stomach contains Fish
Teri (Stolephorus insularis), and fish unidentifL
2
Crustacea
Udang rebon (Asetea sp)
3
Mollusca
Curni-curni (squids)
4
Plankton
a. Fitoplankton - Cyanophyta (Colotrix sp)
-Diatomae (~allasiotrix,Nintzhia,SurilelIa
andChaetocheros)
d. Zooplankton
- Ciliata (Dileptzrs;paramaecium) - Rhizopoda (Arcella and Trigonophxis) - Rotaria (Brancionusdan Karatella)
Continuation Appendix 24 D. Anchovy (Stolephorus insularis)
I
Species
- Cyanophyta (Colotrix dan spirulina)
- Clorophyta (Volvox, Chlorella, Characium, S p i r o ~ r adan Salenastum)
- Phyrophyta - Diatom (Nitzhza, Surilella, Thalaszotrix,plerosima, Skeletonema, Chaetocheros, Planktonella)
- Desmidiacea (Closterium, Denium dan Gonatozygon) -
Euglonophyta
(E.acos
and
Spirogyra)
- Mollusca (Ceresis) - Ciliata (Dileptus
and
Paramecium) -
Rhizopoda (Arcella dan
Trigonophxis)
-
Rotaria (Rotifer, Branchionus and Karatella)
- Entamostraca (Lucifer) -
Meroplankton (Cypris and
Prezoea)
- Larvae unidentified
Appendix 25. Percent of recapitulation of anchovy (Sbolephorus irtsularis) by gonad maturity stage in Makassar Strait during the experiment
Month
Immature
Mature
Half
sampling
?W
P?)
mature (%)
February
73.13
14.43
6.97
March April
June July August Average/ total Range I
I
Remarks
: Immature
Mature
Half mature Post mature
: : : :
Stagel-V Stage VI Stage VII Stage VIII
Post
n
Appendix 26. Percent of recapitulation of Russell's scad (D. ruse€&) by gonad maturity stage in Makassar Strait during the experiment
Month
Immature
Mature
Half
Post
n
sampling
(%)
(%I
mature
mature
(individuals)
(%I
("w
February
96.00
3.00
1.OO
0.00
100
March
71.95
6.15
6.5 1
15.41
283
April
87.75
3.50
7.50
1.25
474
May
90.64
1.72
2.22
5.42
81 1
June
97.46
0.33
0.44
1.77
914
July
40.53
26.84
10.00
22.63
175
August
37.11
28.89
33.33
0.67
20
Average1
74.49
10.06
8.67
6.74
2777
Range
37.11-97.46 0.33-28.89 0.44-33.33
0 - 22.63
20 - 914
Remarks
:
total
Immature Mature Half mature Post mature
: : : :
Stage 1-11 Stage I11 StageIV StageV
Appendix 27. Percent of recapitulation of Indian mackerel (D. ruselly) by gonad maturity stage in Makassar Strait during the experiment
n sampling
mature
February
mature
87.22
March
August
I
Average1 total range I
Remarks
:
I
Immature Mature Half mature Post mature
: : : :
Stage 1-11 Stage I11 Stage IV StageV
I
(individuals)
Appendix 28. Percent of recapitulation of big eye scad (S.crumenopbhalmus) by gonad maturity stage in Makassar Strait during the experiment
Month sampling
1
1
Immature (%)
I
1
Mature
A)
0.00
February March
55.32 65.99
April
I
August
total
0.00
1
27.66 10.20
Post
n
mature
mature
(individuals)
0.00
1
26.19
1
0.00
8.51 12.93 26.19
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
range
1 42.86-92.00 /
Remarks
:
I
I
Half
0.00
42.86
July
I
8-27.66
0.00
1
0-26.19
I
Immature Mature Half mature Post mature
: : : :
Stage 1-11 Stage I11 StageIV Stage V
0.00
Appendix 29. Selectivity data obtained for anchovy during the experiment
Interval Escap- Retain Total class
ed
ed
(xI<~.(x.L)( i d )
(ind)
LN(I/SL-I) Midle SI Estimation
Fraction
Y
Retained
class (x)
(ind)
10 -15
1460
0 1460
0
#DIV/O!
12.5
0.006866
15-20
5033
0 5033
0
#DN/O!
17.5
0.034154
20-25
4401
437 4838 0.090326581
2.309654
22.5
0.153164
25-30
1141 1659 2800
0.5925
-0.3743 1
27.5
0.480540
30-35
468 5417 5885 0.920475786
-2.44883
32.5
0.825525
35-40
308 3531 3839 0.919770774
-2.43924
37.5
0.960318
#NUM!
42.5
0.991986
40-45
0
880
1
880 a=
9.054534
b = -0.326423813
Appendix 30. Analysis of variables in calculation selectivity model using maximum likelihood methods
by
Initial value:
Selectivity formula: S(Z)
=l/[l+Exp(al+b)
a =
-0.504
b
12.419
=
LSO%24.64086 S.P
Sum of Residual
4.359572
I
1.989445
Retained fraction Interval Escap- Retai Total class
Selectivity Logistic Residual
-ned
ed
sq. Residual
(x,G%)
20-21
3008
214
3221
0.066439
0.5 0.433561 0.187975
21-22
623
113
735
0.153741
0.5 0.346259 0.1 19895
22 -23
468
1
468
0.002137
0.5 0.497863 0.247868
2 3 -24
302
113
414
0.272947
0.5 0.227053 0.051553
24 -25
0
1
1
1
0.5
25 - 26
985
563
1547
0.36393
0.5
0.13607 0.018515
26 - 27
0
214
213
1.004695
0.5
-0.50469 0.254717
27-28
156
113
268
0.421642
0.5 0.078358
28 - 29
0
362
361
1.00277
0.5 -0.50277 0.252778
29 - 30
0
412
411
1.002433
0.5 -0.50243 0.252439
30 - 31
156 1496
1654
0.904474
0.5
-0.40447 0.163599
31 - 32
156 208
363
0.573003
0.5
-0.073 0.005329
32 - 33
156 1849
2004
0.922655
0.5 -0.42265 0.178637
-0.5
0.25
0.00614
Appendix 3 1. Selectivity data obtained for Rabdania sp in Makassar Strait during the experiment
Interval
Escaped Retained Total
(XI 2 - 2 )
Fraction Retained
n ( 1 - 1 (r)
Midle class
SI estimation
(XI 12.5
0.061393466
1.694121
17.5
0.167480479
0.403821656
0.389567
22.5
0.382231633
481
0.675675676
-0.73397
27.5
0.655525312
1668
1980
0.842424242
-1.67638
32.5
0.854074149
0
1265
1265
1
#NUM!
37.5
0.94737095
0
92
92
1
#NUM!
42.5
0.982258109
a:
5.535850679
6:
-0.224700618
10-15
312
0
3 12
0
15-20
468
86
554
0.155234657
20-25
468
3 17
785
25-30
156
325
30-35
312
35-40 40-45
Appendix 32 Analysis of variables in calculation selectivity model for Rabdania sp by using maxsimum likelihood methods
Selectivity formula: S(1) =l/[l+Exp(al+b) a=
-0.247486655
b=
6.05 1696975
Initial value:
Sum of 24.45262
L~OYG=
Residual
8.878154
S.P=
0.00595 1 Retained fraction
interval Esca Reta( X ~ S L . ;-ped ~~)
sq.
ined Total
10-15 312
0
15-20 468 20-25
Selectivity 3 12
Logistic
Residual
Residual
0
0.049354 0.049354 0.002436
86
554 0.155234657
0.15 1784 -0.00345 1.19E-05
468
317
785 0.40382 1656
0.381486 -0.02234 0.000499
25-30
156
325
48 1 0.675675676
0.68009 0.004414 1.95E-05
30-35
312
1668
1980 0.842424242
0.879914
35-40
0
1265
1265
1
0.961913 -0.03809 0.001451
40-45
0
92
92
1
0.988643 -0.01 136 0.000129
0.03749 0.001406
Appendix 33. Range of the total length and weight of the discard catch during the experiment
Total lenght (mm) 460
Weigh range (gr)
340-570
2500-3500
3
Ostracian cubicus
20-26
1.3-1.5
36
Buntal
Canthigaster sp
10-88
0.04-13.99
1877
5
Bajulan
Doryrhampus sp
111-200
0.96-2.7
117
6
Bajulan
Sygnathoides
145
8.03
1
buaya
biaculeatus
7
Kepe kepe
Chaetodon sp
78-130
50-342
4
8
Triger
Amanses scapas
26-70
0.5-52.3
2285
9
Peseng putih
Chanda Wolfli
35-74
2.02-8.11
76
Chanda
5.1-82
0.51-8.2
2034
Species No 1
Indonesian name Buntal
Diodon histrix
2
Buntal
Lactophrys trigonus
3
Buntal koper
4
Scientific name
1500
Number of fish (kdi".) 1
1
10 Peseng hitam
commersonii 11 Triger
Aluterus scriptus
80
5.08
1
12 Gemih
Remora remora
470-490
1300-1500
4
13 Kakatua
Scarus sp
150
36
1
14 Peseng
Apogon sp
35-61
0.5-1.8
638 1
Priacanthus
42-260
1.43-55.4
3875
Priacanthus sp
35-93
14-122
889
17 Beloso laut
Sphyraena tumbil
78-205
1.9-65
778
18 Layaran
Heniochus
70-74
10
14
80-100
17.8-19.34
28
peseng 15 Bulan-Bulan
merah 16 Bulan-bulan
arematus
hitam
diphreutes 19 Unidentify
Halichoeres melasmapomus
1
Continuation Appendix 33. No
Species
Indonesian name 20 Arnbon
Scientific name Anornulops sp
Total lenght (mm)
Number weigh of fish range (D) (mdiv.)
47-75
2.8-6.9
2601
ambon 21
Betok laut
Cromis sp
120
150
22
Unknown
Diploprion
110-150
18.6-20.2
124
6 1-67
3.2-4
600
2
bifasciatum 23
Komet
Nemateleotris
rnagnIfica 24
Unknown
Zebrasom rostratum
38
1.28
3
25
Sidat
Anguilla mauritana
550
300
1
26
Sapi sapi
Unidenti@
10-732
0.87-84
35
27
Sembilang
Plotosus anguillaris
114- 116
15-17.5
500
Chaetodon
13,7-40
0.98-1.6
96
40-50
24.2-34.29
3
Squilla sp
25-80
0.32-5.1
680
Octopus sp
7 0- 150
1.8-183
18
hang 28
Ekor kuning
flavirostris 29
Kepiting cepa Varuna litterata
30 Udang
Mantis 31
Gurita
32 Udang rebon
Acetes sp
25-80
40
Appendix 34. Total discard discard every hauling and its relation to the discard rate during the experiment No
Dates of
Haul
Total
Total
Total
By-
Discard
sampling
-ing
catch
By-catch
Discard
catch
rate (%)
(kg)
(kg)
(kg)
rate (%)
1
13-4-
I
175.0
0.400
1.09
2
2002
I1
75.0
2.97
I11
225.0
-
3
0.23
0.63
1.77
-
0.79
3.95
4
20-4-
I
375.0
2.420
0.65
0.10
0.03
5
2002
I1
525.0
3.318
0.27
0.05
0.63
111
825.0
5.625
2.77
0.68
0.34
I
750.0
-
13.60
-
1.80
I1
250.0
-
3.78
-
1.50
I
244.5
0.380
1.79
0.14
0.69
I1
407.0
4.99
1.20
I
58.0
I1
490.0
22.48 0.03
-
1.50
-
3.00
6 7
1-6-2002
8 9
8-6-2002
13
22-6-
I
75.0
14
2002
I1
50.0
-
15
6-7-2002
I
300.0
0.330
2.00
0.11
0.66
I1
525.0
0.300
2.92
0.06
0.56
10 11
9-6-2002
12
16
2.99
5.00 4.60 0.04
17
13-7-
I
100.0
-
11.33
-
11.00
18
2002
11
200.0
0.080
10.64
0.04
5.30
I11
100.0
-
13.25
13.30
I
425.0
-
0.78
-
0.99
19 20
20-7-
0.23
2002 21
27-7-
I
125.0
-
1.24
22
2002
I1
100.0
-
5.07
23
3-8-2002
I
75.0
-
0.12
5.07 0.16
Continuation Appendix 34 No
24
Dates of
Haul
Total
Total
Total
By-
Discard
sampling
-ing
catch
By-catch
Bscard
catch
rate (%)
(kg)
(kg)
rate (%)
24-8-
I
75.0
(kg) -
0.55
-
0.74
2002. 25
31-8-
I
100.0
-
1.34
-
1.34
26
2002
I1
112.5
-
1.33
-
1.20
I11
150.0
-
0.98
-
0.65
27 28
20-9-
I
50.0
-
0.16
-
0.32
29
2002
I1
12.0
-
0.05
-
0.40
30
21-9-
I
12.5
-
0.02
-
0.16
2002
Appendix 35. Discard catch composition caught by bagan ramho during the .experiment Spesies No
Indonesian name
Number of Scientific name
fish (indiv.)
Percent (%)
1
Peseng peseng
Apogon sp
6381
28.500
2
Bulan bulan merah
Priacanthus arematus
3875
17.300
3
Arnbonambon
Anomalops sp
2601
11.630
4
Triger
Arnanses scapas
2285
10.20
5
Serinding putih
Chanda commersonii
2034
9.100
6
Buntal
Chantigaster sp
1877
8.400
7
Bulan bulan hitam
Priacanthus sp
889
4.000
8
Beloso laut
Saurida tumbil
778
3.500
9
Komet
Nemateleotris magnlflca
600
2.700
10
Sembilang karang
Plotosus anguillaris
500
2.240
11
Unknown
Diploprion bifasciatum
12
Bajulan
Doryrhampus sp
13
Kepe-kepe batu
14
0.550 117
0.520
Chaetodon .flavirostris
96
0.430
Serinding hitam
Chanda woljii
76
0.340
15
Buntal koper
Ostracian cubicus
36
0.160
16
Sapi sapi
Lactoria sp
35
0.160
17
Layaran batu
28
0.130
18
Bendera
Halichoeres melasmapomus Heniochus diphreutes
14
0.060
19
Gemih
Remora remora
4
0.020
20
Kepe kepe
Chaetodon sp
4
0.020
21
Unknown
Zebrasom rostratum
3
0.010
22
Buntal
Lactophrys trigonus
3
0.010
-
23
Buntal
Diodon histrix
24
Betok laut
Cromis sp
2
0.009
25
Sidat
Anguilla mauritana
1
0.004
26
Danga
Scarus sp
1
0.004
27
Bajulan buaya
Sygnathoides biaculeatus
1
0.004
28
Triger
Aluterus scriptus
1
0004
22368
100
Total
Appendix 36 Length frequency distribution of Cauthigaster, sp caught by bagan rambo during the experiment
No
Length class (cm)
Middle class (cm)
1
1.0 - 1.4
1.2
101
2
1.5 - 1.9
1.7
146
3
2.0 - 2.4
2.2
132
4
2.5 - 2.9
2.7
97
5
3.0 - 3.4
3.2
137
6
3.5 - 3.9
3.7
163
7
4.0 - 4.4
4.2
125
8
4.5 - 4.9
4.7
84
9
5.0 - 5.4
5.2
128
10
5.5 - 5.9
5.7
133
11
6.0 - 6.4
6.2
96
12
6.5 - 6.9
6.7
77
13
7.0 - 7.4
7.2
128
14
7.5 - 7.9
7.7
133
15
8.0 - 8.4
8.2
115
16
8.5 - 94
8.7
82
Total
Frequency (F)
1877
Appendix 37. Length frequency distribution of Priacanthus armatus, caught by bagan rambo during the experiment Length class (cm)
Middle class (em)
1
0.4 - 1.3
0.85
118
2
1.4 -2.3
1.85
170
3
2.4 - 3.3
2.85
194
4
3.4 - 4.3
3.85
259
5
4.4 - 5.3
4.85
119
6
5.4 - 6.3
5.85
101
7
6.4 - 7,3
6.85
153
8
7.4 - 8.3
7.85
230
9
8.4 - 9.3
8.85
243
10
9.4 - 10.3
9.85
1%
11
10.4 - 11.3
10.85
155
12
11.4 - 12.3
11.85
127
13
12.4 - 13.3
12.85
97
14
13.4 - 14.3
13.85
195
15
14.4 - 15.3
14.85
262
16
15.4 - 16.3
15.85
158
17
16.4 - 17.3
16.85
126
18
17.4 - 18.3
17.85
105
19
18.4 - 19.3
18.85
92
20
19.4 - 20.3
19.85
66
21
20.4 -21.3
20. 85
89
22
21.4-22.3
21.85
136
23
22.4 - 23.3
22.85
165
24
23.4 - 24.3
23.85
118
25
24.4 - 25.3
24.85
63
26
25.4 - 26.3
25. 85
51
NO
Total
Frequency (indiv.)
3875
Appendix 38. Length frequency distribution of Chanda commersonii, caught by hagan ramho during the experiment
Length class
Middle class
Frequency
(cm)
(em)
(indiv.)
1
0.5 - 0.9
0.7
135
2
1.0 - 1.4
1.2
22 1
3
1.5 - 1.9
1.7
264
4
2.0 - 2.4
2.2
115
5
2.5 - 2.9
2.7
166
6
3.0 - 3.4
3.2
197
7
3.5 - 3.9
3.7
175
8
4.0 - 4.4
4.2
124
9
4.5
- 4.9
4.7
133
10
5.0 - 5.4
5.2
146
11
5.5 - 5.9
5.7
142
12
6.0 - 6.4
6.2
80
13
6.5 - 6.9
6.7
93
14
7.0 - 7.4
7.2
33
15
7.5 - 7.9
7.7
6
16
8.0 - 8.4
8.2
4
No
Total
2034
