DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Gebreabiezgi Teklebirhan,
Adane Bitew. Prevalence of Dermatophytic
Infection and the Spectrum of Dermatophytes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology. 2015. 2. Maria da Gloria, Santana GB, Criado PR, et al. Chronic widespread dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton rubrum: a syndrome associated with a Trichophyton-specific functional defect of phagocytes. Front Microbiol.2015. 3. Hidayati Afif Nurul, dkk. Mikosis Superfisialis di Divisi Mikologi Unit Rawat Jalan Penyakit Kulit dan Kelamin RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Tahun 20032005.Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin. 2009. 4. Havlickova Blanka, A.Czaika Victor, Friedrich markus. Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Blackwell publishing Ltd Mycoses. 2008 5. Ilkit M, Durdu M. Tinea pedis: the etiology and global epidemiology of a common fungal infection. Critical Riviews in Microbiology. 2015. 6. Bell-Syer SE, Khan SM. Torgerson DJ. Oral treatments for fungal infections of the skin of the foot. 2012 7. Perdoski. Dermatofitosis Superfisialis. Jakarta: balai penerbit FKUI 2001 8. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1091684-overview#a6 November 2015
46
Akses
29
47
9. Vikas Kumar, Ragini Tilak1, Pradyot Prakash, Chaitanya Nigam, Richa Gupta. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2 (2011) 134-138 Tinea Pedis–an Update 10. http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/allwoman/Myths-surroundingathlete-s-foot-_16490106 Akses 20 Januari 11. Wolff Klaus Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology In General Medicine Seventh Edition Volume Two . New York: Mc Graw Hill Medical,2008. 12. http://www.bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2014/December/docs/BPJ65-tinea-pedis.pdf Akses 30 November 13. http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/athletesfoot/basics/definition/con-20014892 Akses 30 November 14. .http://www.dermnetnz.org/fungal/tinea-pedis.html Akses 1Desember 15. Gino A Epidemiology of dermatophytoses: retrospective analysis from 2005 to
2010
and
comparison
with
previous
data
from
1975.
NEWMICROBIOLOGICA, 35, 207-213, 2012 16. Burns Toni, et al. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology Volume 2.Wiley Blackwell ;2012 17. Carlo CJ, Bowe MD. Tinea Pedis (Athlete’s Foot) [pamphlet]. (USA); 2012. 18. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/17887/5/Chapter%20I.pdf Akses 30 November 19. H.S. Djajoesman. Polisi Lalu Lintas. Jakarta :Dinas Hukum Polri.1976
48
20. W.J.S Poerwadarmita.Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. 1996 21. Djajusman H.S. Polisi dan Lalu Lintas. Bandung: Mabak. 1976 :8 22. Elder, David. Lever’s Histopathology of The Skin Tenth Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2009. 23. Wolff, klaus. Fitzpatrick’s Color Atlas and Synopsis of Clinical Dermatology Seventh Edition. New York: Mc. Graw Hill,2013 24. Zhou Z, Liu T, Zhang Z. Skin Disease in United Nations Peacekeepers in Lebanon. J. R. Army Med Corps. 2016 25. Baihaqy Muhammad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Tinea Pedis pada Pekerja Pabrik Tekstil. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro; 2014 26. Mustofa Ahmad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Pityriasis Versicolor pada Polisi Lalu Lintas Kota Semarang. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro ; 2014 27. Matricciani Lisa, Jones Sara. Treating Tinea Pedis in Patients with Diabetes. Podiatry Today. 2012
49
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance
50
Lampiran 2. Informed Consent
51
52
Lampiran 3. Kuesioner penelitian
KUESIONER PENELITIAN HIGIENE PERORANGAN TERHADAP TINEA PEDIS Keterangan Responden 1. Nomor
:
2. Tanggal pemeriksaan
:
3. Petugas pemeriksa
:
Identitas Responden 1. Nama
:
2. Jenis Kelamin
:
3. Umur
:
4. Pangkat
:
5. Satuan Kepolisian
:
6. Mulai bekerja di kepolisian
:
7. Nomer HP
:
8. Apakah anda pernah mendapatkan terapi tinea pedis (kutu air) pada 1 bulan terakhir? a. Ya b. Tidak Petunjuk Pengisian : Berilah tanda silang (X) pada jawaban yang anda pilih I. Kebersian Umum 1. Berapa kali anda mandi setiap harinya?
Skor
a. Dua kali atau lebih
(1)
b. Satu kali
(0)
53
2. Apakah anda mandi selalu memakai sabun mandi? a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
3. Apakah sabun yang anda gunakan adalah sabun antiseptik? a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
4. Bagaimana penggunaan handuk yang anda pakai? a. Digunakan sendiri
(1)
b. Digunakan untuk banyak orang/bergantian
(0)
5. Berapa seringkah anda mengganti handuk anda? a. 3 hari sekali
(1)
b. 5 hari sekali
(0)
6. Apakah anda mencuci kaki dan mengeringkannya setelah beraktivitas? a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
7. Apakah saat mandi anda menggosok dan membersihkan sela-sela jari kaki, tumit, dan area kaki? a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
II. Kebersihan yang terkait pekerjaan 1. Berapa seringkah anda mengganti kaos kaki anda? a. Setiap hari
(1)
b. Dua hari sekali atau lebih
(0)
2. Jika sepatu dan kaos kaki anda tidak langsung dicuci, bagaimanakah anda menyimpan benda tersebut? a. Diletakkan di tempat yang terkena sinar matahari langsung
(1)
b. Diletakkan di tempat yang tidak terkena sinar matahari
(0)
3. Berapa jam dalam sehari anda memakai sepatu? a. Kurang dari 8 jam
(1)
b. Lebih dari 8 jam
(0)
54
III. Durasi mengatur lalu lintas 1. Berapa lama durasi anda mengatur lalu lintas? a. < 4 jam
(1)
b. > 4 jam
(0)
55
Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisis Analisis Univariat 1.
ROC Umur
56
Coordi nates of the Curve Test Result Variable(s): Umur Positiv e if Greater Than a or Equal To 20.00 22.00 25.00 27.50 28.50 29.50 30.50 31.50 32.50 34.00 36.00 38.50 40.50 41.50 43.00 44.50 45.50 47.00 49.00 51.00 52.50 54.00 56.00
Sensitiv ity 1.000 1.000 1.000 .958 .833 .792 .625 .625 .583 .458 .417 .333 .333 .292 .250 .208 .208 .208 .167 .125 .083 .042 .000
1 - Specif icity 1.000 .824 .765 .765 .706 .647 .647 .529 .412 .412 .412 .412 .353 .294 .235 .235 .176 .118 .118 .118 .059 .000 .000
The test result v ariable(s): Umur has at least one tie between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e actual state group. a. The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1. All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues.
57
2.
ROC Lama masa bekerja
58
Coordi nates of the Curve Test Result Variable(s): Lama bekerja Positiv e if Greater Than a or Equal To .00 1.50 2.50 6.00 9.50 10.50 11.50 12.50 13.50 15.00 16.50 18.00 19.50 21.00 22.50 23.50 25.00 27.00 28.50 30.50 32.50 33.50 35.00
Sensitiv ity 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 .917 .833 .708 .583 .542 .458 .417 .333 .333 .292 .167 .125 .125 .125 .083 .083 .042 .042 .000
1 - Specif icity 1.000 .882 .824 .765 .706 .647 .588 .471 .412 .412 .412 .412 .294 .294 .294 .294 .235 .118 .118 .059 .059 .000 .000
The test result v ariable(s): Lama bekerja has at least one tie between the posit iv e actual state group and t he negativ e actual state group. a. The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1. All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues.
59
3.
ROC Higiene
Coordi nates of the Curve Test Result Variable(s): HIgiena Positiv e if Greater Than a or Equal To 2.00 3.50 4.50 5.50 6.50 7.50 8.50 9.50 11.00
Sensitiv ity 1.000 .958 .958 .917 .833 .583 .333 .125 .000
1 - Specif icity 1.000 1.000 .882 .824 .647 .294 .176 .000 .000
The test result v ariable(s): HIgiena has at least one tie between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e actual state group. a. The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1. All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues.
60
Analisis Bivariat 1. Kategori Lama bekerja Crosstab
Lama bekerja
<6
>= 6
Total
Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 4 0 1.7 2.3 23.5% .0% 13 24 15.3 21.7 76.5% 100.0% 17 24 17.0 24.0 100.0% 100.0%
Total 4 4.0 9.8% 37 37.0 90.2% 41 41.0 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 6.258b 3.870 7.664
df 1 1 1
6.105
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .012 .049 .006
1
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.024
.024
.013
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 66.
Risk Estimate
Value For cohort Tinea pedis = positif N of Valid Cases
2.846 41
95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper 1.837
4.410
61
2. Kategori durasi mengatur lalu lintas Crosstab
Durasi mengatur lalu lintas
< 4 jam
>= 4 jam
Total
Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 10 11 8.7 12.3 58.8% 45.8% 7 13 8.3 11.7 41.2% 54.2% 17 24 17.0 24.0 100.0% 100.0%
Total 21 21.0 51.2% 20 20.0 48.8% 41 41.0 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value .672b .253 .675
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
.656
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .412 .615 .411
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.530
.308
.418
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8. 29.
Risk Esti mate
Value Odds Rat io f or Durasi mengatur lalu lintas (< 4 jam / >= 4 jam) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
3. Kategori higiena
95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
1.688
.481
5.929
1.361
.645
2.871
.806
.479
1.355
41
62
Crosstab
HIgiena
< 7,5
>= 7,5
Total
Tinea pedis positif negatif 12 10 9.1 12.9 70.6% 41.7% 5 14 7.9 11.1 29.4% 58.3% 17 24 17.0 24.0 100.0% 100.0%
Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Total 22 22.0 53.7% 19 19.0 46.3% 41 41.0 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 3.347b 2.285 3.420
3.266
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .067 .131 .064
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.112
.065
.071
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 88.
63
Risk Esti mate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value Odds Rat io f or HIgiena (< 7,5 / >= 7,5) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
3.360
.896
12.600
2.073
.892
4.818
.617
.363
1.049
41
Kategori penggunaan sabun anti septik
Crosstab
sabun antiseptik
Tidak Ya
Total
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 8 2 47.1% 8.3% 9 22 52.9% 91.7% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Total 10 24.4% 31 75.6% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 8.092b 6.129 8.278
7.895
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .004 .013 .004
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.008
.007
.005
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4. 15.
64
Risk Esti mate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value Odds Rat io f or sabun antiseptik (Tidak / Ya) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
9.778
1.729
55.304
2.756
1.465
5.182
.282
.080
.993
41
Kategori penggunaan handuk Crosstab
pemggunaan handuk
digunakan bany ak orang digunakan sendiri
Total
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 2 0 11.8% .0% 15 24 88.2% 100.0% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Total 2 4.9% 39 95.1% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 2.968b .974 3.667
2.896
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .085 .324 .055
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.166
.166
.089
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 83.
65
Risk Estimate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value For cohort Tinea pedis = positif N of Valid Cases
2.600
1.748
3.867
41
Kategori frekuensi mengganti handuk Crosstab
mengganti handuk
5 hari sekali 3 hari sekali
Total
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 9 10 52.9% 41.7% 8 14 47.1% 58.3% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Total 19 46.3% 22 53.7% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value .509b .156 .509
.496
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .476 .693 .476
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.537
.346
.481
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 88.
66
Risk Esti mate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value Odds Rat io f or mengganti handuk (5 hari sekali / 3 hari sekali) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
1.575
.451
5.504
1.303
.629
2.698
.827
.486
1.406
41
Kategori mencuci kaki setelah aktivitas
Crosstab
mencuci kaki
Tidak Ya
Total
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 3 6 17.6% 25.0% 14 18 82.4% 75.0% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Total 9 22.0% 32 78.0% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value .314b .031 .320
.306
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .575 .859 .572
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.711
.435
.580
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3. 73.
67
Risk Esti mate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value Odds Rat io f or mencuci kaki (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
.643
.136
3.035
.762
.279
2.079
1.185
.681
2.062
41
Kategori menggosok dan membersihkan daerah kaki Crosstab
membersihkan daerah kaki
Tidak Ya
Total
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 3 3 17.6% 12.5% 14 21 82.4% 87.5% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Total 6 14.6% 35 85.4% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value .211b .000 .208
.206
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .646 .991 .648
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.679
.488
.650
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2. 49.
68
Risk Esti mate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value Odds Rat io f or membersihkan daerah kaki (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
1.500
.264
8.523
1.250
.510
3.066
.833
.358
1.939
41
Kategori mengganti kaos kaki Crosstab
f rekuensi ganti kaos kaki
2 hari sekali atau lebih setiap hari
Total
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Tinea pedis positif negatif 11 10 64.7% 41.7% 6 14 35.3% 58.3% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Total 21 51.2% 20 48.8% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 2.114b 1.293 2.138
2.063
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .146 .256 .144
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.208
.128
.151
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8. 29.
69
Risk Esti mate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value Odds Rat io f or f rekuensi ganti kaos kaki (2 hari sekali atau lebih / setiap hari) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
2.567
.711
9.266
1.746
.797
3.824
.680
.399
1.159
41
Kategori penyimpanan sepatu Crosstab
peny impanan sepatu
tidak terkena sinar matahari
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
terkena sinar matahari Total
Tinea pedis positif negatif 5 11 29.4% 45.8% 12 13 70.6% 54.2% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Total 16 39.0% 25 61.0% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 1.128b .543 1.145
1.100
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .288 .461 .285
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.344
.232
.294
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6. 63.
70
Risk Esti mate 95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper
Value Odds Rat io f or peny impanan sepatu (tidak terkena sinar matahari / t erkena sinar matahari) For cohort Tinea pedis = posit if For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
.492
.132
1.837
.651
.283
1.498
1.322
.801
2.182
41
Kategori lama memakai sepatu Crosstab
lama memakai sepatu
> 8 jam < 8 jam
Total
Tinea pedis positif negatif 17 21 100.0% 87.5% 0 3 .0% 12.5% 17 24 100.0% 100.0%
Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count % wit hin Tinea pedis
Total 38 92.7% 3 7.3% 41 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 2.293b .820 3.380
2.237
df 1 1 1
1
Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) .130 .365 .066
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
.254
.190
.135
41
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 24.
71
Risk Estimate
Value For cohort Tinea pedis = negat if N of Valid Cases
.553 41
95% Conf idence Interv al Lower Upper .415
.736
72
Lampiran 5. Dokumentasi penelitian
73
Lampiran 6 BIODATA MAHASISWA
Nama
: Astri N Napitupulu
NIM
: 22010112120018
Tempat/tanggal lahir : 25 Desember 1993 Jenis kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jl. Timoho Barat I No 10A Semarang
No. HP
: 085361178522
E-mail
:
[email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal 1. SD
: SD Sanfrancesco Balige
2. SMP
: SMP Budhi Dharma Balige Lulus tahun : 2009
3. SMA
: SMAN 2 Balige
4. FK Universitas Diponegoro
Lulus tahun : 2006
Lulus tahun : 2012 Masuk tahun : 2012