Corruption Eradication Through Prevention of Gratification in Improving Health Services in Indonesia Dora Faculty of Public Health University of Indonesia; corespondence:
[email protected]
Introduction • 1945 Constitution, Article 28H (1) everyone has the right to live physical and spiritual prosperity, reside, and get a good and healthy environment and receive medical care
Introduction • Make the government presence in the building of clean, effective, democratic and credible governance ----Nawa Cita
Introduction • 5.05% of the total state budget (APBN) 2016 (Ministry of Health, 2016). The amount of the health budget leads to greater opportunities for corruption in the health sector
Introduction • Corruption is one of a cause of the low-quality services in Indonesia. • The high level of corruption in Indonesia where Indonesia still got a score of 36 out of 100 in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) in 2015 with a value of 0 is a highly corrupt and 100 is very clean from corruption. Which increasing in the last 8 years
Introduction • Gratification is a broad sense, including money, goods, rebate (discount), commissions, interest-free loans, travel tickets, free medical treatment, and other amenities. • Gratification subdivided into gratification that is not considered bribes and gratification that are considered bribery. • Gratification is one of the actions lead to acts of corruption. Gratification in the health sector can be either reception sponsorship, the cost of education, and more (Permenkes 14/2014 ).
Aim Scientific writing is done to look at the role of prevention in reducing the number of gratification in the corruption perception that will impact on improving health services.
Methodology • Using techniques narrative review of journal articles or related to corruption in the health sector.
Result • Corruption is an extraordinary crime that frequently occurs in Indonesia. • Gratification is a form of corruption. • Gratification happened a lot in the health services. • The government, in this case, especially the Ministry of Health has made efforts in the prevention of gratification and corruption in the health care.
Conclusion • Required the cooperation of all parties to eradicate corruption in Indonesia. • Requires community participation in oversight (Whistleblowing System), an increase of transparency in the bureaucracy, and an increased sense of care and knowledge of health care workers about gratification. • Prevention of gratification can directly reduce corruption thus improving health services.
Reference Faisal, Faisal. 2013. “4. Faisal;Komitmen Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Sektor Kesehatan Pemerintah, Universitas Gajah Mada (UGM) 2013.” Universitas Gajah Mada (UGM). Holmberg, Sören, and Bo Rothstein. 2011. “Dying of Corruption.” Health Economics, Policy and Law 6 (4): 529–47. doi:10.1017/S174413311000023X. Ismail, Praditya Ayu Puspita. 2015. “Peranan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Mencegah Dan Memberantas Gratifikasi Di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen IV (July). Kemenkes. 2013. Buku Anti korupsi;Bisa Berubah;melangkah Bersama Melawan Korupsi Dengan Prestasi. 2013thed. Kemenkes. Manopo, Reinheart. 2015. “Peran Penegak Hukum Dan Masyarakat Dalam Memberantas Gratifikasi Kepada Pegawai Negeri.” Lex Crimen IV. Nawatmi, Sri. n.d. “Korupsi Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Negara-Negara Asia Pasific.” Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 173, 21: 73–82. Permenkes 14/2014. 2014. “Indonesia, 27 Maret 2014. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia no 14 Tahun 2014 tentang pengendalian gratifikasi di lingkungan Kementerian Kesehatan.” Perpres no 55, Perpres no 55. 2012. “7. _________. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No. 55/2012 Tentang Strategi Nasional Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi (Stranas PPK) .” Transparency International. 2006. “Global Corruption Report 2006;Corruption and Health.” 384. London: Pluto Press. Wijayanto, Wijayanto, and Ridwan Zachrie. n.d. Korupsi Mengkorupsi Indonesia Mengukur Tingkat Korupsi PT. Gramedia Utama, hal69 . PT Gramedia Utama.
