AN ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF ENGLISH SUMMATIVE TEST MADE BY THE ENGLISH TEACHER FOR THE SECOND SEMESTER OF THE SECOND GRADE OF SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 1 PALANGKA RAYA
THESIS Proposed to the Department of Education of the State Islamic College of Palangka Raya in partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan Islam
By:
SHELVIA HERIMA SRN.100 112 059 8
THE STATE ISLAMIC COLLEGE OF PALANGKA RAYA THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION 1435 H/2014 M
i
ii
iii
iv
Analisis Validiti dan Reliabiliti Tes Akhir Bahasa Inggris Yang Dibuat Oleh Guru Untuk Semester 2 Dari Kelas 2 SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan (a) untuk mengetahui reliabiliti tes akhir bahasa inggris semester 2 dari kelas 2 SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya. (b) untuk mengetahui validiti tes akhir bahasa inggris semester 2 dari kelas 2 SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya. (c) untuk mengetahui mengapa tes akhir bahasa inggris valid. Pokok masalahnya adalah (a) tes akhir bahasa inggris semester 2 dari kelas 2 SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya reliable? (b) tes akhir bahasa inggris semester 2 dari kelas 2 SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya valid? (c) mengapa tes akhir bahasa inggris valid?. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitative dengan design penelitian deskriptif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah analisis validiti dan reliabiliti, objek penelitian ini adalah tes akhir bahasa inggris yang dibuat oleh guru bahasa inggris. Samplenya diambil 40 persen dari 100 persen. Setelah memperoleh data nilai dari tes akhir bahasa inggris, penulis meanalisis data tersebut dengan menggunakan rumus validitas dan reliabilitas korelasi produk momen. Tes akhir bahasa inggris tersebut terdiri dari 50 butir-butir soal. Hasil analisis menggunakan perhitungan manual menunjukan bahwa tes akhir bahasa inggris itu reliabel dengan nilai 0,72. Terdapat 16 soal yang valid dan 34 soal tidak valid dari 50 soal. Sebuah tes bisa valid kalau sudah reliable. Hasil analisis derajat kesukaran. Mudah terdapat 19 soal ( 38% ), sedang terdapat 22 soal ( 44% ), dan sulit terdapat 9 soal ( 18% ). Hasil analisis daya beda. Jelek terdapat 30 soal ( 60% ), cukup terdapat 9 soal ( 18% ), baik terdapat 11 soal ( 22% ), dan baik sekali terdapat 0 soal. Hasil analisis fungsi distraktornya menunujukan 14 soal tidak berfungsi dan tidak diterima, dan terdapat 36 soal berfungsi dan diterima.
Kata kunci : tes akhir bahasa inggris, validiti dan reliabiliti.
An Analysis Of Validity And Reliability Of English Summative Test Made By The English Teacher For The Second Semester Of The Second Grade Of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya. v
ABSTRACT This study is aimed to (a) the reliability of the English summative test for the second semester of the second grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya. (b) the validity of the English summative test for the first semester of the second grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya. (c) to know the English summative test valid. Problem of the study are (a) is the English summative test for the second semester of the second grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya reliable? (b) is the English summative test for the second semester of the second grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya valid? (c) why does the English summative test valid?. The study used quantitative with descriptive design in finding out the answer of the problem of the study. Subject in this study is an analysis of validity and reliability, object in this study is English summative test made by the English teacher. There are 40% sample from 100% sample. After getting English summative test score, the writer analyzed the data using validity and reliability formula correlation product moment. English summative test have 50 items. The result analysis using manual calculation showed the data English summative test is reliable with score 0.72. There are 16 items valid and 34 items not valid. Result item analysis using level of difficulty. Easy= 19 items ( 38% ), medium= 22 items (44% ), difficult = 9 items ( 18% ). Result item analysis using level of discrimination. Poor = 30 items ( 60% ), satisfactory = 9 items ( 18% ), good = 11 items ( 22% ) and excellent is 0 item. Result analysis using function distracters showed 14 items not functioning and reject, and there are 36 items functioning and acceptable. Key word : English summative test, validity and reliability.
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Alhamduliilah and praise belong to Allah the Almighty, because of his Blessing and Mercy, the research is able to accomplish this thesis entitled : An Analysis Of Validity And Reliability Of English Summative Test Made By The English Teacher For The Second Semester Of The Second Grade Of
SMA
Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya. This thesis is written to fulfill one of the requiremrnts to get title of Sarjana Pendidikan Islam ( S.Pd.I ) in the English Education, the Department of Education, and the State Islamic College of Palangka Raya. Some people have contributed guidance, suggestion, and support to improve of this thesis; therefore the writer would like to express her greatest gratitude to : 1.
Dr. Ibnu Elmi A.S. Pelu, SH., MH., as the director of STAIN Palangka Raya for his direction and permission of conducting this thesis.
2.
Triwid, M.Pd. as the Chair of the Departmen of Education for her permission so that the writer can accomplish the requirements for composing this thesis.
3.
Santi Erliana, M.Pd. as the coordinator of the English Education Study Program and also as the listening lecture of English Education Study Program of STAIN Palangka Raya, for her permission so that the writer can accomplish the requirement for composing this thesis.
4.
Dr. H. Abdul Qodir, M.Pd. as the first advisor for the guidance, encouragement, help and suggestions during composing this thesis.
vii
5.
Rahmadi Nirwanto, M.Pd. as the second advisor for the guidance, encouragement, help and suggestions during composing this thesis.
6.
Dra. Siti Arofah. As the English Teacher at SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palangka Raya.
7.
All teaching staffs of the English Study Program for their valuable knowledge.
Furthermore, the writer also expresses her thanks for her beloved parents, brother, husband, daughter and all family who always support her in accomplishing this study. The last special thanks to her friends of TBI 2010 for their support and help. The writer realized that the study is still far from the perfect some constructive critical and suggestions are welcome. Finally, may allah always bless us.
Palangka raya, October 2014 Writer,
SHELVIA HERIMA SRN. 1001120598
viii
ix
MOTTO
“ Where there is a will, there is a way “ By : Shelvia Herima
x
CONTENTS Pages TITLE ............................................................................................................................. I CONTENT ..................................................................................................................... II APPROVAL OF THE THESIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ....................................... II OFFICIAL NOTE .......................................................................................................... III LEGALIZATION OF THESIS EXAMINING COMMITTEE ..................................... IV ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... VII DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICATION ................................................................. VIII MOTTO ......................................................................................................................... IX DEDICATION ............................................................................................................... X CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... XI LIST OF TABLE ........................................................................................................... XII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOL............................................................. XIII CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... A. Background of The Study ............................................................. B. Previous Study .............................................................................. C. Problem of The Study ................................................................... D. Delimitation of The Study............................................................. E. Assumption of The Study ............................................................. F. Objective of The Study ................................................................. G. Significance of The Study ............................................................. H. Variable of The Study ................................................................... I. Operational Definition .................................................................. J. Frame of Discussion......................................................................
1 1 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF TEST, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY.............. A. The Definition of Test ................................................................ B. The Kinds of Test ....................................................................... 1. Diagnostic Test ...................................................................... 2. Formative Test ....................................................................... 3. Summative Test ..................................................................... 4. Discrete Language Test.......................................................... 5. Integrative Language Test...................................................... 6. Pragmatic Language Test ....................................................... 7. Communicative Language Test ............................................. C. The Function of Test ...................................................................
10 10 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
xi
D. Reliability ................................................................................... 1. Definition of Reliability ......................................................... 2. Characteristic of Good Reliability ......................................... E. Validity ....................................................................................... 1. Logical Validity ..................................................................... 2. Empirical Validity .................................................................. 3. Validity Item .......................................................................... F. Item Analysis .............................................................................. 1. Level of Difficulty ................................................................. 2. Level of Discrimination ......................................................... 3. Analysis Distracters ............................................................... G. Multiple Choice Items ................................................................ 1. General ................................................................................... 2. The Steam/The Correct Option/The Distracters .................... H. Multiple Choice Items (Reading) ............................................... 1. Short Texts ............................................................................. 2. Longer Texts .......................................................................... I. Curriculum and Syllabus ............................................................
20 20 24 26 28 30 32 34 35 36 38 39 39 46 51 51 54 68
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................... A. Research Type ............................................................................ B. Research Design ......................................................................... C. Place of The Study ...................................................................... D. Subject and Object ...................................................................... 1. Subject.................................................................................... 2. Object ..................................................................................... E. Research Instrument ................................................................... 1. Documentation ....................................................................... 2. Research Instrument Try Out ................................................. 3. Research Instrument Reliability ............................................. 4. Research Instrument Validity ................................................ F. Data Collection ........................................................................... 1. Documentation ....................................................................... 2. Analysis.................................................................................. G. Data Analysis .............................................................................. 1. Reliability............................................................................... 2. Validity .................................................................................. 3. Item Analysis .........................................................................
69 69 69 70 70 70 70 70 70 71 71 72 73 73 74 74 74 75 77
CHAPTER IV RESULT OF THE STUDY ............................................................... 80 A. Description of The Data.............................................................. 80 B. Result of The Data Analysis ....................................................... 83 CHAPTER V DISCUSSION ....................................................................................... 96
xii
A. Reliability ................................................................................... B. Validity ....................................................................................... C. English Summative Test Valid ................................................... D. Item Analysis .............................................................................. CHAPTER VI CLOSURE .......................................................................................... A. Conclusion .................................................................................. B. Suggestion ..................................................................................
96 96 97 98 100 100 104
REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 106 Appendix
xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOL TLP : Teaching Learning Process SMA : Sekolah Menengah Atas KTSP : Kurukulum Satuan Tingkat Pendidikan
xiv
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
LIST OF TABLE : Reliability : Validity : Level of Difficult : Level of Discrimination : Function of Distracters
xv
REFERENCES
Abdullah, Shodiq. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra Alderson, J. Charles dan Jayanti Benerjee. 2002 . “Language Testing and Assessment Part 1”. Language Teaching. Vol. 34, pp. 213 - 236 _______. 2002 . “Language Testing and Assessment Part 2”. Language Teaching. Vol. 35, pp. 79 -113 Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2005. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Baron, Denis and Bernard, Harold W. 1958. Evaluation Techniques for Classroom Teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. Brown, James. 1996. Testing in Language Programs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Heaton, J. B. 1979. Writing English Test. London: Longman. Hornby, AS. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lentera Kecil. 2013. Penulisan Daftar Pustaka dari Internet. http://lenterakecil.com/penulisan-daftar-pustaka-dari-internet, (November 17, 2013) Osman, Ridwan Mohamed. Educational Evaluation and Testing. Nairobi: African Virtual University. Slameto. 2001. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Meshkani, Hossein Abadie. 2005. “Influencing reliability of teacher made tests”. Journal of Medical Education. Vol.5, pp. 149 - 152 Sudijono, Anas. 2006. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada. Toendan, W. H. 2006. Educational Research Methods. An Introduction. Palangka Raya: University of Palangka Raya.
xvi
Tuckman, Bruce W. 1975. Measuring Educational Outcomes Fundamentals of Testing. USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Wikipedia. 2013. Curriculum. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curriculum, (September 15, 2013). Wikipedia. 2013. Syllabus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllabus, (September 15, 2013). Wikipedia. 2012. Ujian Nasional. http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ujian_Nasional, (September 15, 2013).
xvii
CURRICULUM VITAE Shelvia Herima was born in Rungun in June 17 1992, regency of
Kotawaringin Barat,
Kalimantan Tengah. She is the first daughter of Mr. Gusti Mawardi and Mrs. Heriyati. She has only one brother, Gusti Ahmad Bai Hacky. She has husband and daughter, Muhammad Kalkah and Sakhira Queisha Wafiya. She started her study at elementary school at sixth years old, and she graduate from SDN 1 Rungun in 1998 to 2004. Then, she continued her study in SMP 1 Kotawaringin Lama, and graduated from 2004 to 2007. Afterward, she studied in SMA 2 Pangkalan Bun, in Social science in 2007 to 2009 and moved to SMA 1 Kotawaringin Lama in 2009 to 2010. Then, she continued her study in state Islamic college of Palangka Raya and took English Education Study Program in 2010. She ended her study at the ninth semester in 2014.
xviii
