SUBMISSION OF THE SKRIPSI PROPOSAL The mechanism of the proposal submission is as follows. a. A student will submit a draft proposal to his/her academic advisor to be reviewed. The draft proposal should be covered with a front page. b. In addition to the content, the draft proposal should include a table of contents and list references. c. The academic advisor will discuss the result of his/her review with the student concerned in order to advise on necessary changes recommended to be made. d. When the academic advisor approves the dratf proposal, he/she will sign the approval form (Consultation Control Form). e. The approved proposal is then submitted / administered to the Office of Study Program for scheduling of a seminar. f. The proposal will be returned to the student if it does not follow the standard format. Therefore, the academic advisor should seriously check and/or make sure whether the format is correct or not in accordance with the standard format. g. The Head of Study Program will appoint 3-4 lecturers as the reviewer/s of the proposal, excluding the student‟s academic advisor and 1 moderator. h. The appointed reviewer/s may automatically become the concerned student‟s supervisor/s. i. If the result of a seminar indicates that the proposal is FEASIBLE or NOT FEASIBLE for a skripsi research, the reviewer will sign and check (√) either one of the boxes provided in the Consent Form. The reviewer/s may write important notes for changes and improvements in the box. j. The student is given an opportunity to amend his/her proposal, and the improved proposal can then be directly submitted to the reviewer/s to be reviewed again (however the proposal is no longer required to be presented at a seminar again, unless there are changes, which affects the substance of the proposal). k. The approved seminar proposal is then submitted to the Head of Study Program for further action (issuance of Surat Penunjukan Pembimbing).
Requirement:
Mashasiswa yang mendaftarkan proposal skripsi pada Prodi harus sudah on line-kan mata kuliah “SKRIPSI”. Lampirkan copy hasil on-line skripsi
1
QUANTITATIVE
margin atas 4 cm
AN EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF THINK-PAIR-SHARE METHOD IN IMPROVING YOUNG LEARNERS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE
1 spasi Bold type
Seminar Proposal [bold type]
Left margin 4 cm
Time new roman 12 pt Bold type
Right margin 2.5 cm
By Marisa Yoestara [bold type] NIM. 0706102020018
STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION SYIAH KUALA UNIVERSITY DARUSSALAM—BANDA ACEH 2014
margin bawah 3 cm
1 spasi Bold type
2
STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION, FKIP UNSYIAH RESEARCH PROPOSAL CONSULTATION CONTROL FORM ACADEMIC ADVISOR (Dosen Wali) Student Name
: ...................................
Student Number
: ...................................
No.
Consultation Stage (Guidance and supervisory Services)
1.
Consultation Service I
2.
Consultation Service II
3.
Received Date Adv’s Initial
Academic Advisor: ...............................................
Return to Student Date Std’s Initial
Advisor’s Remarks
Consultation Service III
4.
Consultation Service IV
5.
Consultation Service V
6.
Consultation Service VI
7.
Approval for format and general content
8.
Proceed to Seminar
Banda Aceh, ........................... 2014 Acknowledged by, Head/Secretary of Study program
Academic Advisor,
.......................................................... NIP. .................................................
................................................................ NIP. .......................................................
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Consultation Control Form .......................................................................................ii Table of Contents......................................................................................................iii 1.5 spaces
List of Appendices (if any) .......................................................................................iv 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research Background.........................................................................................1 1.2 Research Problem ................................................................................................ 1.3 Research Objective .............................................................................................. 1.4 Research Significance .......................................................................................... 1.5 Research Scope .................................................................................................... 1.6 Theoretical Orientation ......................................................................................... 1.7 Research Hypothesis ............................................................................................ 1.8 Operational Definition (optional)......................................................................... 2
RESEARCH DESIGN
2.1 Research method .................................................................................................. 2.2 Population and Sample . ....................................................................................... 2.3 Research Instrument ............................................................................................ 2.4 Technique of Data Collection ............................................................................. 2.5 Technique of Data Analysis ................................................................................
References .................................................................................................................. Appendices .................................................................................................................
ONLY 10-15 PAGES NOTE: A proposal exceeding 15 pages (minimum 10 pages) in the MAIN PART will be returned to be condensed. Ten (10) pages maximum does not include either the FIRST PART or the FINAL PART.
4
margin atas 4 cm
1 margin kiri 4 cm
1.1
INTRODUCTION margin kanan 2,5 cm
Research Background
Speaking is one of the most important skills to be learned by students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). ... of the ability to speak well is reflected in Bilash‟s (2009, p. 1) arguments. He says that ... Referring to the School-Based Curriculum (2006, p. 308), speaking is one of the four language ... before: 6 pt
1.2
Research Problem As decribed in the previous section that for the sake of making an effective
communication, one should practice ... The above statement would be the basis of ... As for, the main question of this research is “How does functional planning strategy (FPS) improve the students’ speaking performance to a KKM standard value?” This focal question is then broken down into the following sub-questions. 1) How does Functional Planning Stratgey ...? 2) How does Functional Planning Stratgey ...? 3) How does Functional Planning Strategy ...? 1.3
Research Objective The research aims at finding out ... This will be looked over through the
following research objectives. 1) Wants to find out ... 2) Wants to find out ... 3) Wants to find out ... margin bawah 3 cm
Page number
5
1.4
Research Significance ...............................................................................................................................
............................ 1.5
Research Scope ...............................................................................................................................
........................... 1.6
Research Hypothesis The author formulates his/her research hypothesis as follows.
Main hypothesis: Research Hypothesis (Ha): If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ speaking performance will be ... Null Hypothesis (Ho): If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ speaking performance will not be ... Sub hypothesis: Research Hypothesis (Ha)*: 1. If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ ... will be ... 2. If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ ... will be ... 3. If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ ... will be ... Null Hypothesis (Ho): 1. If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ ... will not be ... 2. If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ ... will not be ...
6
3. If the Functional Planning Strategy is ..., the students’ ... will not be ... *Catatan bahwa model penulisan hipotesis beragam, sesuaikan dengan saran pembimbing anda
1.7
Theoretical Orientation
1.7.1 Functional Planning as One of the Metacognitive Strategies Metacognitive strategy is one of the categories of language learning strategies. Metacognitive strategies involve the processes ... 1.8
Operational Definition ................................................................................................................................
.......................
2
RESEARCH DESIGN
2.1
Research Method ...............................................................................................................................
........................... 2.2
Populations and Samples ...............................................................................................................................
.......................... 2.3
Research Instruments ...............................................................................................................................
......................... 2.4
Techniques of Data Collection ...............................................................................................................................
......................
7
2.5
Techniques of Data Analysis ...............................................................................................................................
..............................
8
References
Spacing 6 pt
Landon, P. (2006). An introduction to inflow prevention. Pump and System (Online). Retrieved March 9, 2008 from http://www.pumpzone.com/articles/An_Intro.pdf Stuart, A., & Ord, K. (1994). Kendall’s advanced theory of atatistics, vol. 1. New York: Edward Arnold. Kemmis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., Harlow, T., & Bach, J. S. (1993). There‟s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.
9
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE CONTENT STANDARD OF QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH FORMAT Research Background In this section, you begin your presentation by explaining the gap between expectations and reality in the field of education you are studying, both theoretical and practical gaps underlying the problem(s) under study. As part of your supporting ideas, you should also briefly describe the related theory, research findings, conclusions and discussion of scientific seminars, or even your own experience(s)/personal observations, which should closely link to the subject-matter being studied. This will clarify your reasons for doing the research; and such reasons need to be stated in a clear statement. So that, the selected problem(s) for investigation, get(s) a solid platform. Research Problem The formulation of the problem is an attempt to state explicitly the questions you want to resolve. It is a complete and detailed statement about the scope of the problem to be investigated. It is prepared in brief, with solidity and clarity. A good formulation of the problem will reveal the variables (problems) to be studied, the type or nature of the relationship between these variables, and the subjects. Furthermore, the formulation of the problem(s) can be tested empirically, in the sense that data collection can be made to answer the questions or hypothesis put forward. On the basis of the aforementioned statement of problem(s), the author then formulates the research questions, which may be written in several forms, amongst others: (a) in the form of a single question and (b) in the form of general questions followed by specific questions. Research Objective(s) The purpose of research should be related to the status of the research problem(s), i.e. research questions. The purpose of study is the sentence which indicates the existence of something to be obtained after the research is conducted. The content and formulation of research objectives refer to the content and formulation of the research problems/questions. The difference lies in the way that you formulate them. Research problems are formulated using squib sentences, while the research objectives are stated in the form of statements. The number of items of research objectives should be adjusted to the number of items of research questions. Research Significance This section contains the reasons of feasibility of the problem being studied, or the importance of research, especially for the development of science or practical knowledge (e.g. for teachers, students, education practitioners, etc.) or implementation of development in a broader sense.
10
Research Scope A study can be more manageable if there are restrictions in the scope of objectives. Restrictions can be made by limiting the scope of study area. For example: Your research is concerned with the use of Cooperative Learning Approach (e.g. ThinkPair-Share method) in teaching reading skills. In the study of reading, there are many types of reading (e.g. descriptive, narrative, procedural, report, newsitems, etc.). Therefore, limit your study to one specific type of reading, for example - the procedural type of reading. Another example is a research that is concerned with the application of Contextual Teaching and Learning approach or Communicative Approach in teaching speaking skills for junior high school students. If you look at the curriculum of junior high school (ref. VII.1, 3.3; VII.2; 9.2), you will find many speech acts such as „requesting and providing information‟, „thanking‟, „apologizing‟, „expressing politeness‟, requesting and giving opinions‟, „stating likes and dislikes‟, requests for clarification‟, responding interpersonally, etc. Out of these speech acts, you may select or limit your research to only two or three speech acts for your research focus, depending on the logical reasons suggested by your supervisor(s). Theoretical Orientation The theoretical basis for your skripsi should be derived (extracted) from a literature review, particularly the theory that relates directly to the problems examined. You are required to explain the results of the theoretical studies presented in your skripsi (review of the literature). You must read and review the theory(s) to determine your theoretical framework or theoretical basis for your study. The keywords in the title of your proposal will lead you to find related sources of literature. In other words, you must review literature that is related to the topic of your research. The foundation of the theory is a set of theories (especially those related to the variable(s) or object(s) of your research and methods) that you have chosen as a guide to conduct your research. This theory is also used to formulate the hypotheses (particularly in quantitative research), or hypothetical action (in the classroom action research). The materials to complete this section can be obtained from various sources including academic journals, conference proceedings, dissertations, theses, research reports, textbooks, papers, seminar reports, newspaper articles, internet articles, scientific discussions, and official publications of government bodies and other institutions. Research Hypothesis The Research Hypothesis is a brief statement that is postulated from the basic theory or literature review. The hypothesis is a tentative answer to the issues discussed. The “Hypothesis” is the "theoretical conclusion" (result of the theoretical reflection) that still needs to be tested against empirical reality. Because the truth of hypothesis still needs to be tested, then the content of hypothesis must be testable so they can be confirmed. The written hypothesis needs to meet the following requirements: 1. The hypothesis must be formulated in a short but clear statement; 2. The hypothesis must demonstrate the relationship between two or more variables;
11
3. The hypothesis must be supported by theory/ies put forward by experts or related research (listed in the basic theory or literature review). Operational Definition (s) The operational definition(s) is/are the explanation of the definition(s) of variables that your have chosen for your research. Thus, if the title of your skripsi is similar to others, the operational definition(s) should be different. The operational definition is written in a short format which does not resemble the literature review. Research Method In this section, you need to discuss the kind and nature of quantitative research method you will use. Explanations concern with the reasons of why you will use that particular kind of method. Your reasons must indicate the relevance to your research title and method(s). Here, you need to put forward the foundation, source or reference that explains such reasons. Remember! If you use a certain method, viz. descriptive quantitative method, you must be consistent with the type of data, data collection techniques and tools, and techniques of data analysis, all of which lead to the quantitative research. Population/s and Sample/s A population is a set or group of people or objects that have similarities in one or several aspects as the main subjects for a specific research to be conducted. Population(s) to be studied should be clearly defined before the research begins. If you want to study the attitudes of students toward a specific method or technique of teaching, then the population is the entire body of students who follow that learning process using that particular method or technique. If you want to study the effectiveness of the use of cooperative learning methods in SMPN X, then the population is all of the students in SMP X who use cooperative learning methods. Sample(s) is a small proportion of the population. Samples must be accurate and precise, and the sample size should be adequate based on the goal or aim of your research. You need to explain and describe clearly and reasonably the techniques of sampling you will use. For example, simple random sampling, stratified sampling, cluster sampling, systematic sampling, etc. Research Instrument In this section, you suggest the instrument to be used to collect his/her research data. The instrument(s) used shall be in accordance with the design, method, or research approach used. In addition, you must also explain the procedure of instrument development or selection of equipments and materials used in your research. For example, if the instrument to be used is "written test", then describe the components or variables that might be tested, so that, data analysis can be performed more accurately and in accordance with the type of data.
12
Techniques of Data Collection In this section, you should indicate (a) the conformation data collection method(s) and the instruments used, as well as the reasons for their use; (b) clearly and briefly set out the steps and procedures applied during the experimental (treatment) process (details can be delineated in experimental procedure for example in the lesson plan, and (c) the time schedule for implementation of data collection. Technique of Data Analysis The content of this section sets out the statistical analysis technique used and the reasons for the selection of this technique. The reason might be an argument that is associated with your purpose of study, the sample size, and type of data obtained through the instruments used. The reason for selecting a statistical technique should be based on conformity with the research questions rather than on technical sophistication. If a simple statistical technique is considered adequate, there is no reason to choose a more complicated and more sophisticated one. The use of data analysis techniques is directed to answer the research problem or hypotheses being tested.
13
FORMAT PENGETIKAN Bahasa yang digunakan: Bahasa Inggris =ENGLISH Bahan, jenis huruf, dan spasi: Kertas HVS 80 gr, ukuran A4, warna putih. Jenis huruf yang digunakan adalah Times New Roman dengan ukuran huruf 12 point dengan 2 spasi untuk bagian teks. Jenis huruf yang sama juga digunakan untuk tabel, gambar/grafik tetapi dengan ukuran 11 point. Sedangkan ukuran huruf untuk penjelasan dalam gambar berukuran 9-10 point, sehingga gambar serasi dan jelas untuk dibaca. Format yang digunakan: Naskah diketik dengan tinta (catridge) hitam, font Times New Roman, 12 pt; Pengetikan 2 (dua) spasi pada satu muka; Margin dan halaman: ⇒ Margin atas: 4 cm (1.58 inci) dari tepi kertas ⇒ Margin kiri: 4 cm (1.58 inci) dari tepi kertas ⇒ Margin bawah: 3 cm (1.18 inci) dari tepi kertas ⇒ Margin kanan: 2.5 cm (1.18 inci) dari tepi kertas ⇒ Halaman ditulis di sebelah kanan bawah Sampul muka dan belakang: Sampul muka dan belakang dibuat dari karton manila atau yang sejenis, dengan motif polos, warna biru FKIP. Penjilidan: Untuk naskah seminar, dijilid dalam bentuk soft-cover (bawah) pakai kartun manila warna biru FKIP; atas pakai plastik.
14
FORMAT PENULISAN DAFTAR PUSTAKA Secara umum format penulisan daftar pustaka adalah mengikuti kaidah dari APA (American Psychological Association), yaitu dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut: Daftar pustaka ditulis dengan field berurutan sebagai berikut: i. Penulis ii. Tahun penulisan iii. Judul iv. Data Publikasi v. Nama kota penerbit vi. Nama penerbit Penulisan daftar pustaka disusun berdasarkan urutan abjad nama keluarga penulis utama Daftar Pustaka ditulis dengan 1 (satu) spasi, dengan hang indent sebesar 5 (lima) spasi. Catatan: Bila pustaka berasal dari jurnal, maka judul ditulis dengan judul artikel, sedangkan nama penerbit ditulis dengan nama jurnal diikuti dengan edisi penerbitan dan halaman dari artikel tersebut; Bila pustaka berasal dari sebuah artikel/bab yang tersusun dalam buku/prosiding, maka judul dituliskan dengan judul artikel/bab diikuti dengan judul buku/prosiding pustaka diikuti nama editornya. Contoh perujukan: Pengarang tunggal: Neumayer, E. (2003). Explaining the pattern of Aid Giving. London: Routledge Lebih dari satu buku/artikel dengan pengarang yang sama: Neumayer, E. (2003). Explaining the pattern of Aid Giving. London: Routledge. -------------. (2003a). Another title of the same author. London: Routledge. Pengarang lebih dari satu: Stuart, A., & Ord, K. (1994). Kendall’s advanced theory of atatistics, vol. 1. New York: Edward Arnold. Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., Harlow, T., & Bach, J. S. (1993). There‟s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204. Pengarang lebih dari tujuh: Miller, F. H., et al. (2009). Web site usability for the blind and low-vision user. Technical Communication, 57, 323-335.
15
Artikel dari jurnal: Yasin, B. (2009). Developing critical thinking and collaborative learning in language instruction, Wacana Kependidikan, 10(2), 143-154. Abstrak artikel dari jurnal: Yusuf, Y. Q., Pillai, S., & Mohd. Ali, N.T.A. (2013). Speaking Acehnese in Malaysia [Abstract]. Language and Communication, 33(1), 50-60. Majalah: Mistaram. (2008, October). Wisudawan dengan nilai. Komunikasi, hal. 2. Informasi dari website/Internet: Landon, P. (2006). An introduction to inflow prevention, Pump and System, (Online), March 2006 (http://www.pump-zone.com/articles/An_Intro.pdf, accessed 9 Maret 2008) Artikel dalam website/Internet: Judy, G., & Therrien, K. (1993). The syllabus reevaluated: Creating a tool for effective learning”. About Teaching, 44. Retrieved June 29, 2008 from http://learn.quinnipiac.edu/teaching/betterteaching/seminars/documents/4.Sylla busrevisited-Green.pdf Buku manual yang diterbitkan institusi (jurusan): Prodi Bahasa Inggris. (2010). Pedoman penulisan proposal dan skripsi, FKIP Universitas Syiah Kuala., Darussalam. Buku dari suatu lembaga: Direktorat Pembinaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. (1994). Pegangan gaya penulisan, penyuntingan, dan penerbitan karya ilmiah. Jakarta: Depdikbud, Ditjen Dikti. Tugas sarjana, tesis dan disertasi yang tidak dipublikasikan: Yasin, B. (2004). Sistem informasi manajemen pendidikan: Studi pengembangan model sistem informasi manajemen bidang adminsitrasi akademik dan kemahasiswaan pada FKIP Unsyiah. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitas Negeri Malang Malang. Tugas sarjana, tesis dan disertasi yang dipublikasikan: Asyik. A. G. (1987). A contextual grammar of Acehnese sentences. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.acehbooks.org/pdf/00402.pdf. (Order number: 8720237) Laporan penelitian yang pidak dipublikasikan: Yasin, B, dkk. (2009). Manajemen berbasis sekolah: Suatu strategi pembangunan kapasitas lembaga pendidikan yang akuntabel dan transparan menuju
16
pendidikan berkualitas. (Laporan Penelitian). Banda Aceh: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Syiah Kuala. Artikel dalam proceeding: Man, C. Y. (2007). An acoustical analysis of the vowels, diphthongs and tripthongs in Hakka Chinese. Proceedings from: The International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2007 (ICPhS XVI), pp. 841-844. Saarbrücken, Germany. Retrieved June 17, 2010 from www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1614/1614_extra_1.pdf Artikel dalam proceeding (dari CD-ROM): Astina, I. M, & Sato, H. (2003). State of the art on Thermodynamic Modeling for HFC refrigerants: The recent challenge to develop fundamental equations of state, Proceedings from: 4th Doctoral Conference Asia Pacific Rim Universities. National Autonomous University, Mexico. (CD-ROM). Artikel dalam buku berisi kumpulan artikel (ada editor): Fogel, J. (1994). Evolutionary programming in perspective: The top-down view. In J. M. Zurada, R. J. Marks II, & C. J. Robinson (Eds.), Computational intelligence imitating life (pp. 135-146). New York: IEEE Press. Perujukan dari buku yang telah diterjemahkan: Meriam, J. L., & L. G. Kraige. (1988). Mekanika Teknik – Statika, Jilid I, Versi SI, terjemahan Tony Mulia. Surabaya: Penerbit Erlangga. Perujukan dari makalah yang dipresentasikan: Yasin, B. (2009). Creating an integrated English language teaching model for intermediate level of English learners. Paper presented at Lustrum Ke-2 dan Ulang Tahun ke-47 FKIP Unsyiah, 21-23 Desember, 2009. Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Perujukan artikel atau informasi dari koran: Gani, S. (2010, 27 Februari). Pendidikan Aceh semakin rontok, Serambi Indonesia, hal. 22. Schultz, S. (2005, December 28). Calls made to strengthen state energy policies. The Country Today, pp. 1A-2A. Television broadcast: Important, I. M. (Producer). (1990, November 1). The nightly news hour [Television broadcast]. New York, NY: Central Broadcasting Service. A television series: Bellisario, D. L. (Producer). (1992). Exciting action show [Television series]. Hollywood: American Broadcasting Company.
17
Music recording: Taupin, B. (1975). Someone saved my life tonight [Recorded by Elton John]. On Captain fantastic and the brown dirt cowboy [CD]. London, England: Big Pig Music Limited. Motion picture: Smith, J. D. (Producer), & Smithee, A. F. (Director). (2001). Really big disaster movie [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures. Blog Dean, J. (2008, May 7). When the self emerges: Is that me in the mirror? [Blog]. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.spring.org.uk/the1sttransport YouTube Jessica, D. [Dorothy Jessica]. (2013, February 13). Malaysian English - The most colourful English in the world [Video file]. Retrieved February 4, 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsaJ7OPUomc Computer Software/Downloaded Software Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.6.12) [Software]. Retrieved July 27, 2007 from http://www.praat.org/ Online lecture notes and presentation slides Roberts, K. F. (1998). Federal regulations of chemicals in the environment [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://siri.uvm.edu/ppt/40hrenv/index.html Interviews, email, and other personal communication No personal communication is included in your reference list; instead, parenthetically cite the communicator's name, the phrase “personal communication,” and the date of the communication in your main text only: (E. Robbins, personal communication, January 4, 2001). A. P. Smith also claimed that many of her students had difficulties with APA style (personal communication, November 3, 2002).
18
FORMAT PENULISAN KUTIPAN Contoh: Kutipan langsung di luar paragraph (1 spasi; inden kiri-kanan 5 ketukan dan diketik huruf miring) Such an idea has been discussed by Ling (1995, p. 32), which is reflected in her statement as follows: In the current era, the 1990s, which is distinguished by a dominant economic rationalist agenda and the market economy of schooling, there is a demand for new approaches to be taken to organization and administration of the education system and to the policy construction process which results in the setting of a direction for that system. Contoh: Kutipan langsung bahasa asli (mis. Bahasa Indonesia) di luar paragraph (1 spasi; inden kiri-kanan 5 ketukan dan diketik huruf biasa dan tejemahannya diketik di dalam kurung huruf miring) Such an idea has been discussed by Nurhadi, Yasin, and Senduk (2003, p. 45), which is reflected in the following statement. CTL merupakan suatu proses pendidikan yang bertujuan membantu siswa melihat makna yang terkandung dalam bahan pelajaran dengan konteks kehidupan sehari-hari, yaitu dengan konteks lingkungan pribadinya, sosialnya dan budayanya. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut sistem CTL menuntun siswa melalui delapan komponen utama: melakukan hubungan yang bermakna, melakukan pekerjaan yang berarti, mengatur cara belajar sendiri, bekerja sama, berfikir kritis dan kreatif, memelihara hubungan pribadi siswa, mencapai standar yang tinggi serta menggunakan penilaian otentik. (Translation: CTL is an educational process that aims to help students see meaning in the academic subject within the context of their daily lives, that is, within the context of their personal, social, and cultural circumstances. To achieve this aim, the CTL system encompasses the following linked eight components: making meaningful connections, doing significant work, self-regulated learning, collaborating, critical and creative thinking, nurturing the individual, reaching high standards, and using authentic assessments. Contoh: Kutipan langsung di dalam paragrap (tidak lebih dari tiga baris dan diketik huruf miring), dan halaman buku yang dikutip ditulis di akhir kutipan. Kallaus and Keeling (1992) argue that in order to achieve organizational efficiency, an organization should empower specialization. This argument is inferred
19
in their statement as follows, “The more specialized the work assigned to individuals within the limits of human tolerance, the greater the opportunity for efficient performance” (p. 35). Contoh penulisan nama pengarang di luar tanda kurung: Kallaus and Keeling (1992, p. 35) said that “the more specialized the work assigned to individuals within the limits of human tolerance, the greater the opportunity for efficient performance”. Contoh penulisan nama pengarang di dalam tanda kurung: When work is assigned to an individual within his limit, then there is a greater chance for him to perform at his best (Kallaus & Keeling, 1992). *Perbedaan keduanya terletak pada penulisan “and” dan “&”.
SERBA-SERBI Contoh parafrasa dan ringkasan Original Version [Ozagac, 2004, p. 15] A new theory suggests that medicine could be bad for your health, which should at least come as good news to people who cannot afford to buy expensive medicine. However, it is a blow to the medicine industry, and an even bigger blow to our confidence in the progress of science. This new theory argues that healing is at our fingertips: we can be healthy by doing Reiki on a regular basis. Paraphrase Version [Yasin, Burhan, 2009] According to recent findings, medical treatment might adversely affect ones physical condition and so it is suggested that it would be better to maintain our health through meditation such as in Reiki. This discovery has caused serious concern amongst the medical profession and the medical sciences. Conversely, the news is delightful for the impecunious/poor (Ozagac, 2004, p. 15). Summary Version [Yasin, Burhan, 2009] Meditation has been scientifically found to give better release from many kinds of disease than medication. This is a serious concern for both the medical profession and for the advancement of science; but it is helpful for the impecunious/poor (Ozagac, 2004, p. 15).
20
References APA Style. Retrieved February 4, 2012 from http://www.apastyle.org/ APA Style. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/ Basrowi & Suwandi. (2008). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.jpsimbulan.net/tag/sample-thesisformat/ Borg, R. W., & Gall, D. M. (1982). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed). New York: Longman Brannen, J. (1993). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. England: Avebury Ashgate Publishing Limited. Cambell, D., & Campbell, M. (1996). The student’s guide to doing research on the Internet. Canada: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge. Cozby, P.C. (2004). Methods in behavioral research (8th ed.). London: Meyfield Publishing Company. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc. Buku Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi. (2012). Banda Aceh: FKIP Unsyiah. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Ditjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Pertama. (2001). Pedoman teknis pelaksanaan classroom action research. Jakarta: Proyek PPM-SLTP Pusat Jakarta. Descriptive Research Design. Retrieved Fabruary 4, 2014 from http://www.experiment-resources.com/descriptive-research-design.html Hopkins, D. (1993). A teacher’s guide to classroom research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press. Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundation of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Masterpapers.com. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.masterpapers.com/blog/thesis-writing-guide/thesis-format/ Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: Thousand Oaks. McNiff, J. (1992). Action research: Principles and practice. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc. McTaggart, R. (1993). Action research: A short modern history. Geelong: Victoria Deakin University Press. 21
Soejono & Abdurrahman. (1999). Metode penelitian: Suatu pemikiran dan penerapan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Types of Research Design. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.experimentresources.com/research-designs.html#ixzz0inCoQI56. Yasin, B. (1999). Beberapa teori dasar penelitian tindakan kelas: Pedoman pelaksanaan penelitian tindakan kelas. Banda Aceh: Proyek PPM-SLTP Kanwil Depdiknas Kantor Wilayah Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh.
22
Consent Form (Result of Seminar)
Proposal entitled: AN EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE
by Marisa Yoestara NIM. 0706102020018 has been reviewed and justified in a proposal seminar. The reviewer/s agree/s that this proposal is deemed FEASIBLE/NOT FEASIBLE* to be continued by the writing of a skripsi. *coret yang tidak perlu Reviewers’ remarks:
First Reviewer
Second Reviewer
Dr. Qismullah Yusuf, M.A. NIP. 19491120 198003 1 003
Drs. Arifin S, M.Ed. NIP. 19570303 198606 1 004
Date: …………………………….. Note: Please do not attach this page into your proposal. This page is prepared by Prodi.
23
Approval Form (Revised Proposal)
Proposal entitled: Tulis judul baru jika ada perubahan judul. Tulis judul semula jika tidak ada perubahan
by .................................................. NIM. ................................ has been revised as suggested and/or recommended by the reviewers. The reviewer/s agree/s that this proposal is deemed FEASIBLE to be continued by the writing of a skripsi. First Reviewer
Second Reviewer
............................................... NIP. ......................................
............................................... NIP. ......................................
Date: ……………………………..
Note: Please do not attach this page into your proposal. This page is prepared by Prodi.
24
STANDARD OPERASIONAL PROCEDURE (A BRIEF GUIDE TO WRITING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL)
QUANTITATIVE Study Program of English Education Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Syiah Kuala University
Valid from 01 August 2014 to 01 August 2017
STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
SYIAH KUALA UNIVERSITY DARUSSALAM—BANDA ACEH 2014
25
