THE EFFORT OF WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT THE EFFORT OF WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT IN NORTH SUMATRA ( JOKASHO APPROACH ) ( JOKASHO APPROACH )
Dr. Ir. Hidayati Environmental Protection Agency of North Sumatra Province
Outline of Discussion 1 A glance of waste water condition in North Sumatera Profile 1. A glance of waste water condition in North Sumatera Profile 2. Jokasho is the smart installation waste water treatment 3. Lokasi Pioritas dalam penyelamatan sumber daya air di Sumatera Utara ( Danau Toba ) dan sungai Padang. 4. GHG Potential in North Sumatera Province 5.Responsibility Identification for BAU and Mitigation Action in Waste sector
Current Condition of Waste Water Management in North Sumatera Province
PROFILE OF NORTH SUMATRA PROVINCE Population
: 12.985.075
Population growth
: 1,32 1 32 %
Area
: 71,680 Km2 (3,7 % x Indonesia)
GDP
: Rp. 126,45 Trilyun
Export
: US$. 761,34 Juta
Import
: US$. 450,60 Juta
economic growth
: 2,04 % (Tri. I 2013)
Temperature
: 18 - 32 C
(Average rain fall per year 2000 mm)
Waste Processing in Indonesia
Total Volume of Waste Water 2028
Problem faced of Domestic Wastewater in North Sumatera 1.
Domestic Wastewater in North Sumatera not managed well beacuse on a few have recived wastewater treatment facilities (± 0,2 % from the population in North Sumatera.)
2. Lake Toba is the largest volcanic lake in the world but now its polluted. Have performed calculations required capacity of Lake Toba and pollutant load reduction of catch‐ment area. 3. Tebing Tinggi city is surrounded by Padang River and the status of Padang River has a Black Status (Enviromental rate) nowi also polluted , this city is also located in the Northen Sumatera about 90 miles and also Terrian of60 Km from the new Internasional Airport Kuala Namu. 4. Treatment and Condition of Septic Tank has no Processing only Latrine Type in all over Indonesia 6. No processing for Grey Water
7. water resources which consists of 72 Watershed (DAS), 99 master streams, 783 creeks and 659 small twigs river. Largely influence by domestic waste water
8. Industrial ; ± 1400 industries, type of industry : processing industry, not all obey the regulation.
Facilities of Wastewater Treatment in North Sumatera Facilities of Wastewater Treatment in North Sumatera •IPAL Cemara ((domestic wastewater Treatment Plan)t ) has the capacity to process waste 60.000 m3/day until 2012. •That has been used 20.000 m3/day. For the west side of Medan city that has been planned up to year 2030 •not qualified to have an integrated waste water disposal system when the population under one million i h bit t inhabitants • This relates to the need for substantial investment to build an integrated wastewater treatment systems.
% System Waste Disposal and Water Management (Domestic)
No
City/ Region
Discharged into the sea, rivers and lakes
Latrine / pit latrine (wet climate / use the rinse water, ground water g ) level is higher than the latrine)
Septic system (septic tank)
Centralized aerobic wastewater
0,5
0,7
0,5
0
MCF City/ Region
1
Kab. Nias
32,59
56,67
10,74
0
0,61
2
Kab. Mandailing Natal
71,51
11,78
16,71
0
0,52
3
Kab. Tapanuli Selatan
75,19
5,36
19,45
0
0,51
4
Kab. Tapanuli Tengah
44,09
27,12
28,79
0
0,55
5
Kab. Tapanuli Utara
10,3
33,27
56,43
0
0,57
6
Kab. Toba Samosir
12,73
29,32
57,95
0
0,56
7
Kab. Labuhan Batu
7,15
29,87
62,98
0
0,56
8
Kab. Asahan
3,95
30,65
65,4
0
0,56
9
Kab. Simalungun
8,89
28,61
62,5
0
0,56
10
Kab. Dairi
7,12
37,16
55,72
0
0,57
11
Kab. Karo
17,92 ,
11,11 ,
70,97 ,
0
0,52 ,
12
Kab. Deli Serdang
35,56
11,15
53,29
0
0,52
13
Kab. Langkat
8,32
35,78
55,9
0
0,57
14
Kab. Nias Selatan
18,56
78,25
3,19
0
0,66
15
Kab. Humbang Hasundutan
8,6
34,82
56,58
0
0,57
16
Kab. Pakpak Barat
18,26
31,36
50,38
0
0,56
% System Waste Disposal and Water Management (Domestic)
No
City/ Region
Discharged into the sea, rivers and Discharged into the sea rivers and lakes
Latrine / pit latrine (wet climate / use the rinse water ground water use the rinse water, ground water level is higher than the latrine)
Septic system (septic tank)
Centralized aerobic aerobic wastewater
MCF City/ Region
17
Kab. Samosir
4,72
51,36
43,92
0
0,60
18
Kab. Serdang Berdagai
4,75
21,49
73,76
0
0,54
19
Kab. Batu Bara
, 11,87
25,44 ,
62,69 ,
0
0,55 ,
20
Kab. Padang Lawas Utara
46,18
19,64
34,18
0
0,54
21
Kab. Padang Lawas
52,46
28,23
19,31
0
0,56
22
Kab. Labuhanbatu Selatan
12,65
26,34
61,01
0
0,55
23
Kab. Labuhanbatu Utara
12,56
38,84
48,6
0
0,58
24
Kab. Nias Utara
17,46
61,89
20,65
0
0,62
25
Kab. Nias Barat
12,95
66,28
20,77
0
0,63
26
g Kota Sibolga
54,74 ,
4,75 ,
40,51 ,
0
0,51 ,
27
Kota Tanjung Balai
14,43
5,27
80,3
0
0,51
28
Kota Pematang Siantar
8,21
4,27
87,52
0
0,51
29
Kota Tebing Tinggi
2,03
3,38
94,59
0
0,51
30
Kota Medan
9
4,42
65*
21,58
0,40
31
Kota Binjai
6,79
4,95
88,26
0
0,51
32
Kota Padang Sidempuan
35,11
5,7
59,19
0
0,51
33
Kota Gunungg Sitoli
39,75
29,71
30,54
0
0,56
Sumber: Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional (Susenas), 2010 Keterangan: *) RIPJM 2011-2015 Kota Medan
Capacity Index map of North Sumatera Province
Gg CH4 Ekuivalen)
Jokasho is the Jokasho is the smart installation waste water treatment t t t t t
300 250
44.91
200 150 208.23
100 50
Tahun
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
0
Limbah Cair Limbah Padat
EEnvironmental i t l management and protection protection
The components of environment
water
air i
biodiversity
Domestic waste
Liquid waste i id
jokasho
land
Vegetation Vegetation cover
Industrial waste
S lid Solid Waste
3 R
Plant
Gas Pollutant ll
Why do we need Jockashou ? 1. Have technology that can reduce pollution domestic waste 2. Housing conditions in North Sumatra is very difficult to rebuild the channel. 3. Easy monitoring and operation. (Can be done with periodic maintenace) 4. Save water resources from pollution in North Sumatra 5. In Lake Toba has happened eutrophication pp p may also reduce y the burden organic pollutants that can reduce the growth spurt water hyacinth (algae).
General Description of Lake Toba • Width : 110.260 Ha • Height : ± 900 m dpl • Rainfall : 1.700 – 2.400 mm/year • Sub DAS on DTA : 19 Sub DAS • Include 9 (nine) regencies: – Karo regency g y – Dairi regency – Simalungun regency – Toba Samosir regency – Humbang Hasundutan regency – Samosir regency – North Tapanuli regency – Asahan regency g y – Tanjung Balai city
Activity Near Lake Toba Disposal sposal o of wate in Lake a e Toba oba
Toilet near Balige District
Washin thier clotesh near lake Toba Eceng gondok di Kelurahan Tiga Raja Kecamatan Girsang S. Bolon
Lwaste/ Polluted
Domestic Waste Water
Eceng gondok di Kelurahan Tiga Raja Kecamatan Girsang S. Bolon
Source 1. As the source of drinking water 82% of the drinking water 82% of the communities around Lake Toba using lake water as a Toba using lake water as a raw water source of d i ki drinking water t
2. As Hydro Power Station:
‐ Asahan hydropower has 450 MW Capacity ‐ Lae Renun hydropower has 82 MW Capacity Lae Renun hydropower has 82 MW Capacity
3. Asahan hydropower, which uses the water of Lake Toba as the turbines, turbines where the electricity generated is used by PT. Inalum for aluminum smelting 4. PT. Toba Pulp Lestari that use water as the water of Lake Toba River production through Asahan 5. As tourism destination such as: Parapat Tomok Tuk‐tuk Siadong Tongging Parapat, Tomok, Tuk‐tuk Siadong, Tongging, Sipisopiso waterfall, Tao Silalahi, Muara‐Pulau Sibandang, Haranggaol, Tao Sidihoni, Tele, Hot Spring Pangururan etc Spring Pangururan, etc.
Pig Farm in Near Lake Toba ‐PT. Allegrindo • C Capacity of Product that is permitted it f P d t th t i itt d : 25.000 25 000 ekor/semester Total Livestock : 25.000 ekor/semester : 25 000 ekor/semester • Total Livestock • Type of Waste that is Produced: Liquid waste, Solid, Gas • Solid Waste can be used for composting and also for Fertilizer • Liquid waste can be process to be water thatcan be consumed for livestock. • Regulation Number Regulation Number : 15.07/P2KLB3‐2012 parameter : 15 07/P2KLB3 2012 parameter Enviromental that has been qulified.
Capacity of polluted Area (DTBP) Parameter for Danau Toba T‐P Method of Measurement M th d f M t : ‐ Permenlh No. 28 Tahun 2009Load capasity Water P ll ti Pollution and Reservior. dR i Status trofik Danau Toba : ‐ Oligotrofik Oli t fik (T‐P < 10 µg/l) (T P < 10 /l) Monitoring Result 2012 : T‐P = 110 µg/l K d T PD Kadar T‐P Danau T b Toba qualified of oligotrofik lifi d f li t fik
II. Lake Toba Ecosystem Pollution Load 1. Domestic Pollution Load Regency
Domestic Pollution Load (kg/day
2. Pollution load from others
II. Lake Toba Ecosystem Pollution Load 1. Domestic Pollution Load Regency
Deomestic Pollution Load (kg/day
2. Pollution load from others
Sourcess Rainfall Agriculture Grass Land Forest Paddy Field
3. Livestock Pollution Load 3. Livestock Pollution Load
4. Fishery Pollution Load
Unit Limbah Rata‐rata Rata‐rata Total Total Total Limbah Jumlah Pemilik KJA Produksi Pakan Produksi Pakan Nitrogen Phospor BOD Nitrogen Phospor uniit (ton/tahun/uni (t /t h / it KKJA)JA) (ton/tahun) (t /t h ) (K(Kg/Kg /K Pakan) k) (t(ton/tahun) /t h ) Masyarakat 8428 2,84 4,3 23.935,5 36.240,4 1.163,3 409,5 0,0321 0,0113 0 PTPT. Aquafarm Aquafarm 484 31.310000 000,0 59.595200 520,0 1.19106 910,6 672, 67266 Total 54.935,5 95.760,4 3.073,9 1.082,1
Water Quality for Water Quality for Danau toba (parameter: TSS, M&L, BOD, COD NO3 NH3 DO pH) COD,NO3,NH3,DO, pH)
STATUS MUTU AIR DANAU TOBA (PEMANTAUAN 2005 s/d 2010) No Desa Nilai Stored Kesimpulan 1 TONGGING ‐12 Cemar Sedang 2 HARANGGAOL ‐15 Cemar Sedang 3 SALBE ‐12 Cemar Sedang 4 TIGARAS ‐20 20 C Cemar Sedang S d 5 PARAPAT ‐20 Cemar Sedang 6 SIMANINDO ‐18 Cemar Sedang 7 AJIBATA ‐20 20 Cemar Sedang Cemar Sedang 8 TENGAH SILALAHI ‐18 Cemar Sedang 9 AMBARITA ‐12 Cemar Sedang 0 TOMOK O O ‐18 8 Cemar Sedang Ce a Seda g 10 11 ONAN RUNGU ‐20 Cemar Sedang 12 TENGAH TAO SILALAHI ‐10 Cemar Ringan 13 SIREGAR AEK NALAS/SIGAOL ‐20 Cemar Sedang 14 PORSEA ‐26 Cemar Sedang 15 BALIGE I ‐12 Cemar Sedang 16 BALIGE II ‐12 Cemar Sedang 17 LINTONG ‐8 Cemar Ringan 18 MUARA ‐16 Cemar Sedang 19 BAKARA ‐20 Cemar Sedang 20 PALIPI/MOGANG ‐26 26 Cemar Sedang Cemar Sedang 21 PANGURURAN ‐18 Cemar Sedang 22 SILALAHI ‐18 Cemar Sedang
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN BUSINESS / ACTIVITIES IN THE LAKE TOBA Hotel
Total: 23 hotel
Hospital/ clinic
Petro Stasion
Total : 6
Fishery
Farming
PLTA/PLT M
Ect.
Total : 4
Total : 4
Total : 13
Total : 5
Total: 4
WWTP
83% do not have the WWTP
67% do not have the WWTP
‐
Envirome ntal Document
100 %not have Enviroment al Document
83 %not have Enviroment al Document
100 % have an Envirom ental Docume nt
Wastewat er discharge permit
100% have 100% have a a wastewater wastewater discharge discharge permit it permit it
‐
100 %do not 50 %do not have the have the WWTP WWTP 25 % tidak have Envrioment document
100 5 have enviroment document
100 % 67 % permit wastewater to throw discharged wastewater into the lake
‐
60 % do not have the WWTP
7 % do not have envirome nt document
40 % do not have enviroment document document
‐
80 % do not have permit to discharge wastewater
GHG Potential in North Sumatera Province GHG Potential in North Sumatera Province
Gg CH4 4 Ekuivalen)
Emisi GRK (BAU) Sektor Limbah Sumut ( ) 300 250 44.91 200 150 208.23
100 50 0 2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Limbah Cair
Tahun Limbah Padat Limbah Padat
BAU baseline domestic wastewater in North Sumatra No.
Year
1
D Domestic ti Wastewater W t t Emisi GRK (Gg CH4)
Emisi GRK (tCO2eq)
2010
39,39
827.275
2
2011
39,91
838.180
3
2012
40,44
849.228
4
2013
40,97
860.423
5
2014
41,51
871.765
6
2015
42 06 42,06
883 256 883.256
7
2016
42,61
894.899
8
2017
43,18
906.696
9
2018
43,75
918.648
10
2019
44,32
930.757
11
2020
44,91
943.026
Project baseline in Emission of GHG (Gg CH4) In Waste Water Sector,
39,39 Gg CH4 Year 2010
44,91 Gg CH4 Year 2020.
Base of Calculation Base of Calculation The calculations were carried out on domestic and The calculations were carried out on domestic and industrial wastewater in North Sumatra as a basic reference to: Population p number of industry Volumes of domestic and industrial wastewater d domestic wastewater BOD Data, Data sewer and WWTP i O d Data domestic wastewater on‐site; septic tanks and pit‐ latrine or other latrine, or other.
Uncolleected
Type of Treatment and Disposal
Potential of CH4 and N2O emissions
Septic Tank
Sludge dewatering regularly will reduce CH4 production.
Open pits/Latrines
Pits / latrine will produce CH4 when produce CH4 when the temperature and retention time allows.
Direct discharge to the river
Pits / latrine will produce CH4 when the temperature and retention time allows retention time allows.
Estimated GHG emissions wastewater sector still use the wastewater sector still use the default number of Tier I. Emissions estimated value is based on the population of North Sumatra province, assuming a value of degradable organic l fd d bl i component of 14.6 kg BOD / capita / year and a maximum capacity / year and a maximum capacity result in methane gas at 0.6 kg BOD according CH4/kg 2006 IPCC Guidelines Chapter 6
No. 1.
2.
Usulan Aksi Mitigasi Program Peningkatan Sarana-Prasarana Persampahan sesuai UU No 18, 2008) Program Minimasi Sampah dengan prinsip 3R No.
3. 4. 55. 6.
Usulan Aksi Mitigasi
Program g Peningkatan g Pengelolaan g 1. Program Gas Peningkatan Sarana-Prasarana Sampah Persampahan sesuai UU No 18, 2008) Pembangunan prasarana Waste Water 2. Program Minimasi Sampah dengan prinsip 3R Treatment Pemukiman 3.
Program Peningkatan Pengelolaan Gas Sampah Pembangunan prasarana Waste Water Treatment Pemukiman Program Pengendalian Banjir Program Penyusunan Perencanaan Pengelolaan Persampahan Penyusunan Perencanaan Pengelolaan Air Limbah
Program Pengendalian Banjir 4. Program Penyusunan Perencanaan Pengelolaan Persampahan 5.
7.
Penyusunan Perencanaan Pengelolaan Air 6. Limbah 7.
8.
Program Pengelolaan Badan Air
9.
8.
Penurunan Emisi GRK
Pelaksana
751.694 tCO2eq
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker PLP, BLH Prov, BLH K/K
306.800 tCO2eq
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker PLP, BLH Prov, BLH K/K
Penurunan Emisi GRK
Pelaksana PU Cipta Karya Prov dan 2K/K, Satker PLP, BLH Prov, BLH K/K
S k PLP Satker PLP, S Swasta
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker PLP
35 461 tCO 35.461 CO eq
751.694 tCO2eq
190.293 tCOK/K, 2eqSatker PLP, BLH
306.800 tCO2eq
Prov, BLH K/K PLP, Swasta 94 303 tCO2Satker 94.303 eq PLP
35 461 tCO2eq 35.461
190.293 tCO2eq
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan
Satker PLP Tidak ada nilaiK/K, emisi 94.303 tCO2eq
Dinas PSDA PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker PLP
Dinas PSDA
Cipta Karya Prov dan Tidak adaemisi nilaiPU emisi Tidak ada nilai K/K, Satker PLP
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan K/K, Satker PLP, BLH Prov, BLH K/K
PU Cipta Karya Prov dan Tidak ada nilai Satker PLP, BLH Tidak adaemisi nilai K/K, emisi BLH Prov, BLH K/K Prov, BLH K/K
10. 11 11.
Program Pemberdayaan Lingkungan dan Masyarakat
Kesehatan
9.
Program Monitoring dan Evaluasi 10. 11.
Program Non Teknis RAD GRK
Program Pengelolaan Badan Air Program Pemberdayaan Kesehatan Lingkungan dan Masyarakat Program Monitoring dan Evaluasi
Program Non Teknis RAD GRK
Tidak ada nilai emisi
BLH Prov, BLH K/K
Tidak ada nilai emisi Tidak ada nilai emisi
Dinkes K/K, BLH Prov K/K Bappeda Prov K/K, BLH
Tidak adaemisi nilaiProv emisi Tidak ada nilai K/K, DKP K/K, Tidak ada nilai emisi
Satker PLP Bappeda Prov K/K, BLH Prov K/K, Dinas Pendidikan Provsu
Tidak ada nilai emisi
Total kegiatan
Total kegiatan (termasuk (termas k ssub b kegiatan ) Total Penurunan Emisi BAU Persentase Penurunan Emisi Total biaya mitigasi
49 kegiatan (termasuk sub kegiatan ) Total Penurunan Emisi BAU Persentase Penurunan Emisi Total biaya mitigasi
49 kegiatan
1.368.449 tCO2eq q 5.315.858 tCO2eq 25,7% 1.841.010,00 (Rp.juta)
1.368.449 tCO2eq 5.315.858 tCO2eq 25,7% 1 841 010 00 (Rp juta)
Dinkes K/K, K/K BLH Prov K/K Bappeda Prov K/K, BLH Prov K/K, DKP K/K, Satker PLP Bappeda d Prov K/K, / BLH Prov K/K, / Dinas Pendidikan Provsu
SSources of Emissions from Waste Sector fE i i f W t S t by RAN‐GRK
Final Processing Domestic Solid Waste
Emission from Waste sector
Inceneration (open Burning)
Disposal
Composting
Communal Domestic Waste Watter Centralized
Responsible BAU Identification and Mitigation Actions Waste Sector
Penetapan Kewenangan Pelaksanaan Aksi Mitigasi Sektor Limbah
Nasional Provinsi Kabupaten/Kota Sektor (K/L Terkait) (SKPD Terkait) (SKPD Terkait) • Kebijakan bij k • Kordinasi di i • Pengelolaan l l dan program pengelolaaan limbah padat dan pengelolaan l l li b h padat limbah d dan d cair i yang limbah cair Provinsi yang dari Nasional Kabupaten/Kotadihasilkan Sektor (K/L Terkait) (SKPD Terkait) (SKPD Terkait) Limbah • dari dan •dihasilkan nasional i • l Kebijakan dihKordinasi ilk dPengelolaan i limbah I d ti Industri d dan padat dan cair yang program pengelolaaan limbah dihasilkan dari pengelolaan padat dan cair yang Limba • Pengelolaan Industri dan Domestik Industri dan limbah nasional dihasilkan dari h Domestik • Pengelolaan Industri dan g limbah B3 li b h B3 limbah D Domestik tik dari dari Domestik d i kabupaten/kota kabupaten/kota
Conclusion 1. Is needed Jokasho as solutions to problems of wastewater domestic in North Sumatra 2. Mainly to save Lake Toba from destruction is needed jokasho around Lake Toba. 3. Domestic wastewater in North Sumatra contributed to the decline in the quality of surface water (rivers and lakes) and also groundwater. 4.Domestic Waste Management in North Sumatra is a potential toward GHG reduction
