Daftar Pustaka Arends, R.I. (1997). Classroom Instruction and Management. Boston: McGraw Hill. Arikunto, S. (2005). Dasar-dasar Evakuasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Arnawa, I.M (2006). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pembuktian Mahasiswa dalam Aljabar Abstrak melalui Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Desertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan. Ausubel, D.P (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Learning. New York : Grune and Stratton. Azwar, S. (2007). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Banihashemi, S.S.A.(2003). “Connection of Old and New Mathematics on Works of Islamic Mathematician with a Look to Role of History of Mathematics on Education of Mathematics.” [Online]. Informing Science. Tersedia: http://proceedings.informingscience.org/IS2003Proceedings/docs/009Banih. pdf [2 April 2009]. Bell, F.H. (1993). Teaching and Learning Mathematics. IOWA : WCB. Bergeson, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Using Research to Shift From the “Yesterday” Mind to the “Tommorow” Mind. [Online]. Tersedia: www.k12.wa.us. [20 April 2009]. Blosser, P.E. (1990). Research matters to the Science Teacher No.9001. Using Question In Science Classrooms. Columbus, OH: Professor of Science Education, Ohio State University. Bruner, J, Alison, J and Kathy, S (1976). Its Role in Development and Evaluation. New York : Basic Books. Campbell, L, et al. (1996). Teaching and Learning Through Multiple Intelligences. Massachussets : Alyn and Bacon Carr, R.A. (1981). Theory and Practice of Peer Counceling. Ottawa : Canada Employment and Immigration Commission. Carr, W and Kemmis, S. (1989). Being Critical : Education, Knowledge, and Action Reseach. London : Falmen Press.
281
Cardelle, M.E. (1995). Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Skills to Student with low Mathematics Ability. In M.J. Dunkin & N.L. Gage (Eds), Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Reseach and Studies 8, 109-111. Oxford : Pergamon Press. Carter, T.D. (2005). Peer Counseling: Roles, Functions, Boundaries. ILRU Program. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.peercounseling.com. [28 Mei 2010]. Cowie,H, and Wallace, P (2000). Peer Support in Action: From Bystanding to Standing By. London : Sage Publications. Coxford, A.F. (1991).Geometry from Multiple Perspectives. Curriculum and Evaluation Standart for Scholl Mathemaics Addenda Series. Grades 9-12, edited by Cristian R. Hirsh. reston, Va : NCTM. Coxford, A.F. (1995). “The Case for Connections”, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc. Cuoco, A.A., Goldenberg, E.P., Mark, J. (1995). Connecting Geometry with the Rest of Mathematics, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Dahar, R.W (1989). Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. of How Children Learn Mathematics: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol.27, No.1, January 1996, 100-106. Davis (1996). One Very Complete View (Though Only One) De Bock, D.,Verschaffel, l., and Janssens.(1998). The Predominance of The Linier Model in Secondary Schoo Student’s Solution of Word Problem Involving Length and Area of Similar Plane Figures, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 65-83. De Corte, E., and Somers, R.(1982). Estimating The Outcome of a Task as a Heuristic Strategy in Arithmetic Problem Solving: A Teaching Experiment with Sixth graders, Human learning, 1, 105-121.
282
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Van Coillie, V. (1988). Influence of Number Size, Problem Structure and Response Mode on Children’s Solution of Multiplication Word Problems, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 197-216. De Corte, E., Greer, B., and Verschaffel, L.(1996). Psychology of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, in D.C Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Hand Book of Educational Psychology (pp. 491-549). New York: Macmillan. De Lange (1987). Mathematics Insight and Meaning. OW. & OC. Utrecht. Dixon, Wilfrid J., Massey, Jr Frank J.(1983). Introduction to Statistical Analysis. Fourth Edition. Los Angeles: Mc. Graw-Hill, Inc. All Right reserved. Eggen, P.D and Kauchak, D (1996). Education Psychology: Classroom Connections. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Ernest, P.(1991). The Philosopy of Mathematics Education. London: The Falmer Press. Emilia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Alpabeta : Bandung Fauzi, A, Suryadi, D (2010). Pedagogogical Content Knowledge (PCK) melalui Peran Guru dan Konteks dalam Antisipasi Didaktis dan Pedagogik (ADP) Menuju Matematika Abstrak. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional, tanggal 27 Novmber 2010 di Yogyakarta. Fauzi, A, dan Sabandar, J (2010). Pembentukan Lanjut Kemandirian Belajar dalam Mengembangkan Kebiasaan Berpikir Siswa SMP dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif. Pedagogik : Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan Kopertis Wilayah I NAD-Sumatera Utara; ISSN N0. 1907-4077 : Kopertis Wilayah I NADSumatera Utara. Fisher, K.W. and Danies (1980). A Theory of Cognitive Development : The Control and Construction of Hieracies of Skill, Psycology Review, 447-531. Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In L. Resnick, (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Freudenthal, Hans (1973). Mathematics as an Education Task. Dordrecht : D.Reidel Publishing Co. Garrison, D.R, Anderson, T, and Archer, W (2001). Critical Thingking and Computer Conferencing : A Model and Tool to Assec Cognitive Presence. [Online]. Tersedia: http://communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/ CogPres Final.pdF [20 Maret 2010].
283
Glading, S.T. (1995). Group Work: A Counseling Specialty. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Goldin, G.A. (2002). Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving. Dalam L.D English (Ed). Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (IRME). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Goos, M. and Geiger, V (1995). Metacognitive Activity and Collaborative Interaction in The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia, Darwin, July 7-10-1995. Goos, M. (1995). Metacognitive Knowledge, Belief, and Classroom Mathematics. Eighteen Annual Conference of The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Darwin, July 7-10 1995. Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Woodland Hills: Dept. of Physics, Indiana University. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.physics. ndiana.du/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf [3 Januari 2011]. Hodgson, T.(1995). “Connections as Problem-Solving Tools”, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Hudojo, H. (2002). Representasi Belajar Berbasis Masalah. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Matematika XI, Edisi Khusus. Israel, Susan et al. (2005). Metacognition in Literacy Learning. Theory, Assesment, Instruction and Professional development.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers : London. Ito-Hino, K. (1995). Students’ Reasoning and Mathematical Connections in the Japanese Classroom, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Izsak, A. and Sherin, M.G. (2003). Exploring the Use of New Representations as Resources for Teacher Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 1, 103. Jacob, C. (2000). Belajar Bagaimana untuk Belajar Matematika: Suatu Telaah Strategi Belajar Efektif_Prosiding_Seminar Nasional Matematika: Peran Matematika Memasuki Millenium III. ISBN: 979-96152-0-8; 443-447. Jurusan Matematika FMIPA ITS Surabaya, 2 November 2000. Joyce, B. and Weil, M. (2000) Models of Teaching. New Yersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
284
Jendriadi. (2009). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Membaca melalui Strategi Bertanya (Question Only strategy) bagi Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Wacana dan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Johnson, D.W and Johnson, R (1981). Effect of Cooperative Competitive and Individualistic Goal Structures on Achievenment : A Meta Analysis Pshchological Bulletin, 89, (47-62). Johnson, K.M. and Litynsky, C.L. (1995). Breathing Life into Mathematics, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Kadir, (2010). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Potensi Pesisir sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik, Komunikasi Matematik, dan Keteramilan Sosial Sisw SMP. Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Kan, P.V, Tindall, J.D and Gray, H.D. (1985). Peer Couceling: In-Depth Look at Traning Peer Helpers. Muncie: Accelerated Development Inc. Kan, P.V. (1996). Peer Counseling in Explanation. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.peercounseling.com. [28 Mei 2010]. Kansanen, P. (2003). Studying the Realistic Bridge Between Instruction and Learning. An Attempt to a Conceptual Whole of the Teaching-StudyingLearning Process. Educational Studies, Vol. 29, No.2/3, 21-232. Kaur, B (2001). Singapores School Mathematics Curriculum for the 21st Century. In International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Paper Presented at the Qualifications and Currikulum Authority Conference on “Reasoning Explanation and Proof in School Mathematics and their Place in the Intented Curriculum” held from 4-6 Oct 2001 at. Kirkley, J (2003). Principle for Teaching Problem Solving. Indiana University : Plato Learning. Kleiman, C.M. (1995). “Seeing and Thinking Mathematically in the Middle School”, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Kramarski, B. and Mizrachi, N. (2004). Enhancing Mathematical Literacy with The Use of Metacognitive Guidance in Forum Discussion. In Proceeding of the 28th Conference of International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.biu.ac.il/ edtech/E-kramarski.htm. [10 Juni 2009].
285
Kramarski, B. and Mevarech, Z. (2004). Metacognitive Discourse in Mathematics Classrooms. In Journal European Research in Mathematics Education III (Thematic Group 8) [Online]. Dalam CERME 3 [Online]. Provided : http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/proceedings/ Groups/TG8/TG8 Kramarski_cerme3.pdf. [12 Juli 2009]. Kramarski, B. and Mevarech, Z.R. (1997). Cognitive - Metacognitive Training within a Problem Solving Based Logo Environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 425-445. Krutetski, V. A (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in School Children. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press. Krulik, S. and Rudnick, J. (1995). “Projects in the Middle School Mathematics Curriculum”, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Kuhn, D. (1991). Education for Thinking: What can psychology contribute? In M.Schwebel, C.A. Maher, & N.S.Fagley (Eds),Promoting cognitive growth over the life span. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kurz, R.E.(1991). Annotated Instructor’s Edition, Teaching Elementary Mathematics. Baston : Allyn and Bacon Kusuma, Y.S. (2008). Konsep, Pengembangan dan Implementasi ComputerBased Learning dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan High-Order Mathematics Thingking. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 23 Oktober 2008 di Bandung. Kwon, J and Lee, G. (2001). What do We Know about Student’ Cognitive Conflict in Science Classroom: a Theorical Model of Cognitive Conflict Process, [Online]. Tersedia : http://www.ed.psu.edu/c1/journals/2001[15 April 2009]. Lastari, Aat. (2008). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMA melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif. Tesis pada PPs UPI: Tidak diterbitkan. Laursen, E.K. (2005). Rather Than Fixing Kids-Build Positive Peer Cultures. Reclaiming Children and Youth. 14. (3). 137 – 142 (ProQuest Education Journals). Leake, L. (1995). “Cennecting Number and Geometri”, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
286
Lester, F., Garofalo, J., and Kroll, D. (1989). The Role of Metacognition in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Study of Two grade Seven Classes (Final Report to The National Science Foundation, NSF Project No. MDR 8550346). Blomington: Indiana University, Mathematics Education Development Center. Lie, A (2005). Pembelajaran Kooperatif suatu Model Pembelajaran. Gramedia : Jakarta. Lipton,L, and Hubble, D (2010). Menumbuhkembangkan Kemandirian Belajar. Nuansa : Bandung Livingston, Jennifer A (1997). Metakognition : An Overview. [Online]. Tersedia : http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.html. [15 Maret 2009]. Lo, S. (2006). Defining the Peer Advisor in the U.S. Study Abroad Context. Journal of Studies in International Education. 10 (2). 173-184. Malone, J.A. and Krismanto,A (1997). Indonesian Student Attitudes and Perception Toward Small Group Work in Mathematics Journal of Science and Mathematyics Education in South Weast Asia: Vol XVI No. 2 tahun 1997. Masingila, J.O. (1995). “Carpet Laying: An Illustration of Everyday Mathematics”, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Maulana, (2007). Alternatif Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGSD. Bandung: Tesis pada PPs UPI: Tidak dipublikasikan. Mayer, R. E. (1987). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49-63.
Mayer, R.E., et al (1991). Mathematical Problem Solving in Japan and the United States: A Controlled Comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 83, No. 1 , 69-72. McCoy, L.P., Baker, T.H., and Little, S. (1996). Using Multiple Representations to Communicate: An Algebra Challenge. Dalam P.C Elliot dan M.J Kenney (Eds). Yearbook Communication in Mathematics K-12 and Beyond. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: a Possible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Ames, Iowa: Department of Physics and Astronomy. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.physics.iastate.edu/per/ docs/Addendum_on_normalized_gain.pdf [4 Februarit 2010].
287
Mevarech, Z.R. and Kramarski, B (1997). IMPROVE: A Multidimensional Method for Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2). Mikovch, A.K and Monroe, E.E (1994). Making Mathematical Connection Across The Curriculum : Activities to Help Teachers Begin. School Science and Mathematics. 94(7) Mohini, M. and Nai Ten, Tan. (2004). The Use of Metacognitive Process in Learning Mathematics. In The Mathematics Education into the 21 th Century Project University Teknologi Malasyia. [Online]. Tersedia : http://math. unipa.it/~grim/21_project/21_malasya_mohini159_162 05.pdf. [20 Agustus 2009]. Muijs, D. and Reynolds, D. (2008). Effective Teaching Teori dan Aplikasi, Edisi Kedua. Terjemah oleh: Drs. Helly Prajitno Soetjipto, M.A. dan Dra. Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Mullis, M, Gonzalez and Chrostowski (2004).TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eight Grades. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Muin, A, Sumarno, U, Sabandar, J (2006). Metacognitive Approach to Improve Mathematics Skills of High School Students. International Journal of Education Vol.1, No.1, Nopember 2006. hal 68-86. Muro, J.J, and Kottman, T. (1995). Guidence and Counseling in the Elementary and Midlle School: A Practical Approach. Madison: Brown & Benchmark. National Council of Teacher of Mathematyics (1989). Curriculum and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston,V.A: NCTM. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA : Author. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2003). Curriculum and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston,V.A: NCTM. defining Problem Solving. [online]. Tersedia : http://www. learner.org/channel/courses/teachingmath/ gradesk_2/session_03_a.html. [11 Februari 2010]. Nickerson, A.B. and Nagle, R.J. (2005). Parent and Peer Attachment in Late Chidhood and Early Adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence. 25 (2). 223 – 249. Sage Publications.
288
Nindiasari, H. (2004). Pembelajaran Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman dan Koneksi Matematik Siswa SMU Ditinjau dari Perkembangan Kognitif Siswa. Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Nort Central Regional Education Laboratory (NCREL), (1995) [online]. Tersedia : http//www.neat.tas.edu.au.htm. [2 Maret 2010]. Oakley, L. (2004). Cognitive Development Routledge: London and New York. Olkun, S. (2003). Making Connections : Improving Spasial Abilities with Engineering Drawing Activities. [online]. Tersedia : http//www.ex.ac. uk/cimt/ijmtl/ijabout.htm. [11 Februari 2010]. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning. O’Neil Jr, H.F. and Brown, R.S. (1997). Differential Effect of Question Formats in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect. Los Angeles: CRESSTCSE University of California. Panaoura, A, and Philippou, G (2004). Young Pupils´ Metacognitive Abilities in Mathematics in Relation to Working Memory and Processing Efficiency. University of Cyprus, Cyprus. Paris,S.G and Winograd, P (2004). The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Contextual Teaching : Principles and Practices for Teacher Preparation. [online]. Tersedia : http://www.ciera.org/Library/archive/200104/0104 parwin.htm [27 maret 2010]. Pape, S.J. et.al. (2003). “Developing Mathematics Thinking and Self-Regulated Learning: Teaching Experiment in Seventh-Grade Mathematics Classroom”. Journal Educational Studies in Mathematics. 53. 179-202. Perfect, T. J. and Schwartz, B, L (2002). Applied Metacognition. Cambridge University Press. Australia. Piaget,J. (1970). Piaget’s Theory. In Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology. Edited by Paul H. Mussen .New York : John Wiley and Sons. Plomp, T. (1997). Educational & Training Systems Design. Enschede, Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente. Polya, G. (1985). How to Solve It. A New Aspect of Mathematical Methods. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
289
Prabawa, H, W. (2009). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif. Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Pugalee, D.A. (2001). Using Communication to Develop Student’s Mathematical Literacy. Dalam Journal Research of Mathematics Education 6 (5). 296299. [Online]. Tersedia: http// www.my.nctm.org/ercsources/articlesummary.asp?URI-MTMS 2001-01-296aandfrom [17 April 2009]. Ratnaningsih, N. (2007). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kontekstual terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematik serta Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Ridley, D.S. et.al. (1992). Self Regulated Learning : the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education 60 (4), 293-306. Rohaeti, E, E (2003). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Metode IMPROVE untuki Meningkatkan Pemahaman dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Pertama (SLTP). Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Royer, J.M. (1996). Designing Instruction to Produce Understanding. In G.D Phye & T. Andre (Eds). Cognitive Classroom Learning. Florida : Academic Publisher. Ruseffendi, E.T. (1998a). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non Eksakta Lainnya. Bagi para Peneliti, Penulis Skripsi, Penulis Tesis, Penulis Disertasi, Dosen Metode Penelitian, dan Mahasiswa. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Ruseffendi, E.T. (1998b). Statistika Dasar untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: IKIP Bandung Press. Ruseffendi, E.T. (2005). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang NonEksakta Lainnya. Bandung: Tarsito. Ruseffendi, E.T. (2006). Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito. Sabandar, J. (2005). Pertanyaan Tantangan dalam memunculkan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Makalah pada Seminar MIPA di JICA UPI Bandung : tidak diterbitkan.
290
Sabandar, J. (2007). Berpikir Reflektif. Makalah pada Seminar Tingkat Nasional FMIPA UPI Bandung : tidak diterbitkan. Saragih, S (2008). Profil Kemampuan Keruangan Siswa SMP di Kota Pekan Baru, FKIP Universitas Riau Pekanbaru. Hasil Penelitian: Tidak dipublikasikan. Santrrock, J.W. (2004). Life-Span Development. Ninth Edition. Boston: McGrawHill Companies. Sapa’at, A. (2001). Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif untuk mengembangkan Kompetensi Matematik Siswa. [On Line]. Tersedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/martingale.%28betting.system. [17 April 2009]. Sharples, J and Mathews, B (1989). Learning How to Learn : Investigating Effective Learning Strategies. Victoria: Office of School Administration Ministry of Education. Shirley, L. (1995). “Using Ethnomathematics to Find Multicultural Mathematical Connections”, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. Slavin, R, E. (1997). Educational Psychology. Theory and Practice. Fifth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Steinberg, L, (1993). Adolescence. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill, Inc. Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada. Sudjana. (1996). Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito. Suherman, E. (2003). Evaluasi Pengajaran Matematika. Bandung: UPI. Sumarmo, U. (2004). Kemandirian Belajar : Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. Makalah Disajikan pada Seminar Pendidikan Matematika di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA Universitas Yogyakarta tangggal 8 Juli 2004 : tidak diterbitkan. Sumarmo, U. (2005). Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Mendukung Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Tahun 2002 Sekolah Menengah. Makalah pada Seminar Pendidikan Matematika di FPMIPA Universitas Gorontalo tanggal 7 Agustus 2005. Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. [Online] http://math.sps.upi.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Berpikir-dan-DisposisiMatematik-SPS-2010.pdf. [25 Februari 2010].
291
Suparno, P (2001). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyakarta: Kanasius Suryadi, D. (2005). Penggunaan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Tidak Langsung serta Pendekatan Gabungan Langsung dan Tidak Langsung dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematik Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP. Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Suryadi, D. (2010). Metapedadidaktik dan Didactical Design Research (DDR): Sintesis Hasil Pemikiran Berdasarkan Lesson Study. Teori Paradigma, Prinsip, dan Pendekatan Pembelajaran MIPA dalam Konteks Indonesia. JICA FMIPA UPI. Bandung. Suzana, Y. (2003), Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Penalaran Matematik Siswa SMU melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif. Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Syaodih, E. (2007). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa. (Studi pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial di Sekolah Dasar). Disertasi Doktor pada SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan. Tata. (2009). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Berorientasi Teori Van Hiele. Tesis pada PPs UPI: Tidak diterbitkan. TIM MKPBM (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: UPI. Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Bahasa. (2001). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Tomo (2002). Mengintegrasikan Teknik Membaca SQ3R dan membuat Catatan Berbentuk Graphic Postorganizer dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan. Tyler, R.W. (1991). Curriculum Resources. In A. Lewy (Ed). The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford : Pergamon Press. Uyanto, S.S. (2009). Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Graha Ilmu: Yogyakarta. Verschaffel, L., et al, (1999). Learning to Solve Mathematical Application Problems: A Design Experiment with Fifth Graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1999, 1(3), 195-229.
292
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: Falmer Press. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wardani, S. (2009). Pembelajaran Inquiri Model Silver untuk Mengembangkan Kreativitas dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan. Webb, N.M (1989). Peer Interaction and Learning in Small Groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39. Wolters, C.A; Pintrich, P.R; and Karabenick, S.A (2003). Assessing Academic Self-Regulated Learning. [online] Tersedia: www.childrends.org/Files/ Wolters Pintrich Karabenick Paper.pdf. [11 Nopember 2009]. Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A Sosial Cognitive view of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 81(3). 329-339.
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
