DAFTAR PUSTAKA Aronoff, S, 1989. Geographic Information System: A Management Perspective. WDL Publication, Ottawa, Canada. Anonimous, 2002. Laporan Tahunan Perikanan Provinsi Gorontalo. Dinas Kelautan dm Perikanan Provinsi Gorontalo.
, 1988. Peta Landsystem dan Land Suitibility. Bakosurtanal. ,2000. Kerusakan Mangrove dan Rencana Pengelolaan di Bagian Utara, Sulawesi Utara. Fakultas Kehutanan IPB.
1990. Stella I1 :Aplcation. High Performance System. Hanover. BAPPEDA Provinsi Gorontalo. Gorontalo.
200 1.
Rencana Tata Ruang W ilayah Provinsi
Barg, U.C., 1992. Guidelines for the promotion of environmental management of coastal aquaculture development. F A 0 Fisheries Technical Paper 328, FAO, Rome. 122p. Bruton, D.N. 1994. Economic Factors and Valuatioan of Tropical Coastal Resources. SMR-Report 14/1994. Center For Studies Of Environmental and Resources, University of Bergen. Norway. Bengen, D.G. 1999. Pengenalan dm Pengelolaan Ekosistem Mangrove. Pedoman Teknis. PKSPL IPB. Bogor
Bengen, D.G. 2000. Teknik Pengarnbilan Contoh dan Analisis Data Biofisik Sumberdaya Pesisir. Sinopsis. PKSPL IPB. Bogor Bintoro, R.S. dm B.M.Sukojo.1998. Analisis Perubahan Garis Pantai Mengpakan Pendekatan Multi tingkat Berdasarkan Data Penginderaan Jauh. Warta Inderaja 1 l(2): 3-7.
Biro Pusat Statistik Kehutanan. 1996. Statistik Kehutanan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Boyd, C.E. 1989. Water Quality Management and Aeration in Shrimp Farming. Fisheries and Allied Aquaculture Departemental Series No. 2. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama, USA.83 p.
Boyd, C.E., L. Massaut, and L.J. Weddig, 1998. Towards reducing environmental impacts of pond aquaculture. INFOFISH International 2/98, p:27-33.
Boyd, C.E., 1999. Management of shrimp ponds to reduce the euthrophication potential of effluents. The Advocate, December, 1999 p: 12- 14.
CDS (Club.de Sahel), 2000. "ECOLOG Mcmuging the Ecormomy k c d y in West Afiica".Club de Sahel. Campbell, J.B. 1987. Introduction to Remote Sensing. Guilford Press, New Y o k Carver, S. Heywood, I., Cornnelius, S., dan Sear, D. 1996. Evaluation Field Based GIs for Environmental Characterization, Modelling and Decision Suppurt, in GIs and Environmental Modelling. Progress and Research Issues. GIS Wordl
Book. USA. Chrisman, N. 1997. Exploring Geographic Information System. John Wiley 62 Sons Inc. USA. Cicin -Sain B and Knecht W.R. 1998. Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management. Concept and Practices. Island Press. Washington. D.C.
Clark JR.1996. Coastal Zone management Hand Book. Lewis Publishers. Bocamnto. Dahuri, R., Rais, I., Ginting, P., Sitepu, M.J. 1996. Pengelolaan Surnkrdaya Wilayah Pesisir dan Laut Secara Terpadu. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta. Dahuri, R. 1998 Pengatuh pencemaran limbah industri terhadap potensi sumber daya laut. Makalah pada seminar Teknologi Pengolahan l imbah Industri dan Pencemaran Laut. Agustus 1998. BPPT. Jakarta. Dahuri, R. 2003. Paradigma Baru Pembangunan Indonesia Berbasis Kelautan. Buku Orasi Ilmiah. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Dahuri, R. 2004. Kebijakan dan Program Pembangunan Kelautan dm Perikanan Nasional : Fokus Utama pada Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing. Makalah. Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan. Bogor.
Davis F.W.and D.S. Sirnonett. 1991. GIS and Remote Sensing, p. 191-2 13. In D.J. Maguire, M.F. G d c h i l d and D.W.Rbind (eds). Geographical Information Systems. Longman Scientific and Technical and John Wiley, New york. Davis F. W., D.A, Quattrochi, M.K. Ridd and N.S.N. Lam. 1 99 1. Research Needs in Processing and Analysis of Remote Sensing and GIs Data. NCGIA Tech. Pap. No. 91-16. Dewanti, R. and B. Hasyim. 1992. Coasta! Landuse and Sedimentation Analysis In Pelabuhan Ratu. Dalam : Application of Remote Sensing Techniquesfor Marine Resouces and Coastal Environment. Uno, S. Eds. Ni hon Shinko,Nagasaki, Japan.pp 73-75.
Dewanti,R., Munyati, N.Suwargana dan A.Subagyo. 1996. Perubahan Fisik Lingkungan Di Wilayah Pesisir Segara Anakan, Jawa tengah Menggunakan Data Inderaja Satelit Kumpulan Mablah Seminar Marifim Indonesia 1996.Badan Pengakajian dan Penerapan Teknologi dm Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Pertahanan Keamanan Nasional, Makasar, Indonesia. ha1.7 1-87.
Digby, P.G.N. and R. A. Kempton. 1987. Multivariete Analysis of Ecological Communities. Chapman and Hall. London-Newyork
Dixon, John and Sherman, P. 1990. Economic of Protected Areas : A New Look at Benefit and Cost. East-West Center. Djamaiuddin, R. 1995. Kontribusi Hutan Mangrove d a l m Penyediaan Nitrogen dan Phosfor Potensid di Perairan Sekitar Likupang, Kabupaten Minahasa, Sulawesi Utara. Thesis. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Eriyatno. 1996. Ilmu Sistem. IPB Press. Bogor. ESN. 1990. Undertanding GIs : The Ardnfo Method Environmenttal System Uecearch Institute. Redlands, CA. USA. Fakultas Kehutanan, 2000. Inventarisasi dm Identifikasi Lahan Kritis Mangrove di 7 (tujuh) Pmvinsi . Laporan. Kerjasama dengan Dirjen Rehabili tasi Lahan dan Perhutanan Sosial. Jakarta. Fatuchri, S . 2002. Kebijakan Pembangunan Akuakultur. Makalah Workshop tanggal 20 April 2002. Himaqua FPIK IPB.
Hall, C.A.S and J.W. Day, Jr. 1977. Ecosystem Modelling in Theory and Practice : An Introductory to System Analysis with Ecological Applications. Edward Arnold, London. Hamid, 2003. Alokasi Pemanfaatan Wilayah Pesisir Kabupaten Garut untuk Budidaya Tarnbak Udang Melnlui Analisis Sistem Infomasi Geografis. Fakulatas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Institut Pertanian Bogor. Thesis. 94 hal.
Hanggono, A.1998. Periiaku Spektral Obyek-Obyek Geografis Di Pantai Timur Sumatra. Warta Inderaja 1l(2): 64-73. Harris, E. 1996. Perencanam dm Pengelolaan Pembangunan Budidaya Pesisir Berwawasan Lingkungan dan Berkerlanjutan. Pelatihan ICZPM, Bogor 19 Agustus-2 1 Desember 1996. PPLH-IPB. Harris, E. 1997. Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Bisnis Tarnbak Udang. Makalah Tanggal 5 April 1 997. Himaqua FPIK IPB.
Hartanto,J.1995. Penggunaan Teknologi hderaja Sebagai Masukan Dalam Proses Perencanaan Tata Ruang. M.S Geodesi. Program Pasca Sarjana Institut Tehologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia Hillel, J. 1997. Computer Simulation of Soil Water Dynamic. A Compendium of Recent Work. International Development Center. University Park Press. Hoagland, 1995.
Methological Review of Net Benefit Evaluation for Marine
Reserves. Wordl Bank.
Honda, Y. 1999. Fundamentals o f Remote Sensing in Guide to Remote Sensing : The Text Bcak for the Eight IHP Training Course. Nagoya. The Institute Hydrosperic-AthmosphericScience. Jefirs, J.N.R. 1978. An Introductory to System Analysis with Ecological Applications. Edward Arnold, London. Kay, R. and Alder, J . ( 1 999) Cousial M a n a ~ m e n und i Planning, E & FN SSPON, New York.
Kennish, M.J. 1990. Ecology of Estuaries : Biological Aspect. Volume 11. CRC. Press. Boston Kepres Presiden Nomor 32. 1990. Pengelolaan Kawasan Lindung
Kibria, G., D.Nugegda, P.Lam, and R. Fairclough, 1996. Aspects o f phosphorus pollution from aquaculture. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, July 1996.p:20-24. Last Stand : Protected Areas and Defence o f Tropical Biodiversity. Oxford University Press, Inc.
b i m e r . 1997.
Kusurnastanto, K. 2000. Ekonomi Sumberdaya dm Lingkungan : Diktat Kuliah. Kusumastanto, T. 2002. Reposisi "Ocean Policy" dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia di Era Otonomi Daerah. Orasi Ilmiah. Fakultas Perikanan dan llmu Kelautan. IPB. Lillesand,T.M. and R.W .Kiefer. Sutanto.Ed. I 990. Penginderaan Jauk Dan Interpretmi Citra. Gajah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Mander J. dan E. Goldsmith (Ed.), 2000. "The Care Agaimi the GIobal Economy and for a Turn Toward the Lokar'.
NRMP Report Nornor 62. 1996. Economic Value of Fisheries to the Residents o f Bunaken National Marine Park. Jakarta. NRMP. Naamin, N. 1990. Penggunaan Lahan Mangrove untuk Budidaya Tambak, Keuntungan dan Kerugiannya. Prosiding Seminar IV Ekosistem Mangrove, Bandar Lampung 7 - 9 Agustus 1990. Panitia Nasional Program MAB Indonesia-LIPI. Jakarta.
Nybakken, J.W. 1988. Biologi Laut : Suatu Pendekatan Ekologi. Alih Bahasa : Eidman, M.,Koesbiono., D.G. Bengen, H. Hutorno, S. Sukardjo. IT.Gramedia. Jakarta. 459 h.
Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. Third Edtion. Saunders, Philadephia
Pariwono, J.I. 1997. Osemografi Fisika dan Dinarnika Perarisn Pesisir. Mahlah Pelatihan Perencmaan Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir secara Terpadu. PKSPL IPB. 32 hal. Pennak, R.W. 1989 Freshwater Invertebrate of the United States. 3 and Sons, Inc. New York. 803 p.
'ed. John Wiley
Perace and Moran. 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity. IUCN and CSEGE
Phillips, M.J., R. Clarke, and A. Mowat, 1993. Phosphorous leaching from Atlantic Salmon diets, Aquaculhrral Engineering 12 (1993, p :47-54. PKSPL IPB. 2002. Laporan Studi Awal Pengembangan Perikanan dm Kelautan. Kerjasama PKSPL IPB dengm Dinas Perikanan dan Kelautan. Provinsi hpung. Paryono, T.J. 1999. Ksjian Ekonomi Pengelolaan Ekosistern Mangrove di Kawasan Segara Anakan, Kabupaten Cilacap, Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Thesis. Program Pasca Sarjma IPB. Poernomo, A. f 992. Pemilihan Lokasi Tarnbak Udang Bemawasan Lingkungan. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan, Badan Penelitian dm Pengembangan Pertmian, Jakarta. 40 hal.
Poernomo, A. 1 997. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Pengembangan Budidaya Udang Ramah Lingkungan. Ditjen Perikanan. Pramudji, E.Yusron dan Z.Tarigan. 1996.Dampak Perubahan Tata Guna Lahan Terhadap Hutan Mangrove Di Pesisir Passo, Am bon. Kmpulan MaRnIak Seminar Maritim Indonesia 1996.BBP Teknologi dan Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Pertahanan Keamanan Nasional, Makasar, Indonesia, ha]. 4 1-56. Prasetyawati, R. 200 I. Kajian Pengembangan Perikanan di Pesisir Barat Pangandarm (Teluk Parigi), Kabupaten Ciamis, Jawa Barat. Thesis Program Pascassrana IPB. Bogor. 122 Hal
Purwanto, J, 1998. Analisis Kebijakan Pengelolaan dan Relevansinya terhadap Perencanaan Pengembangunan Pulau-Pulau Kecil di Indonesia. Makalah Prodising Seminar dan Lokakarya Pengelolaan Pulau-Pulau Kecil di Indonesia Editor. CBH Edyanto, et aZ (1988). Diselenggarakan oleh Protyek Pesisir, USAID, BPP Teknologi dan Direktorat Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Lahan dan Kawasan Depdagri. Ruitenbeek, H.J. 1991. Mangrove Management : An Economic Analysis of Management Option with a Focus on Bintuni Bay, Irian Jaya. Environmental Management Development in Indonesia Project (EMDI). E m 1 Environmental Report No. 8. Jakarta
RWer, F. 1965. Fundamentas Of LimrmIogy. University of Toronto Press. Canada. 295 p Sanim, B. 1997. Metoda Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya dan Jasa-jasa Lingkungan Wilayah Pesisir. Makalah Pelatihan ICZPM, 25 November - 9 Januari 1997. PKSPL P B - Ditjen Bangda, Jakarta. wrianegara, I. 1978. Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Junrsan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. IPB. Bogor.
Sorensen, J.C., S. Mc Creary and M.J Hersman. 1984. Institutional Arrangement of Coastal Resource. Research Planning Institute, Inc. Columbia, South. Sulistiawati, M. 2003. Karakteristik Ekologis Muara Sungai Randangan, Kecamatan Marisa, Kabupaen Boalemo, Provinsi Gorontalo. Skripsi. Tidak Dipublikasikan. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Institut Pertanian Bogor. Suprato,T., D.G.Gandadikusumah, N.Suwargana, H.Sidik dm S.U. Nugroho. 1992. Coastal Landuse and Sedimentation Analysis In Pelabuhan Ratu. Dalam : Application of Remote &ruing Techniques for Marine Resouces und C01zstaI Environment. Uno,S.Eds. Nihon Shinko,Nagasaki, Japan.pp 59-6 1.
TIM Fakultas Kehutanan. 2000. Rencana Rehabilitasi Mangrove di Bagian Utara Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Bogor. Fakultas Kehutanan IPB Wekel, R.G. 1975. Lyrnnology. W.B.Saunders Company. Philadelphia. Troronto.
London. Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1997. Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
UNCED. 1992. Agenda 2 1. Widigdo, B. 2000. Diperlukan Pembakuan Kriteria Eko-Biologis untuk Menentukan "Potensi Alami" Kawasan Pesisir untuk Budidaya Udang. Prosiding Pelatihan untuk Pelatih Pegnelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Terpadu, Bogor 21-26 Februari 2000. PKSPL IPB. 5 hal. Widigdo, 3. 2002. Manfhat Sampling bagi Keberhasilan Budidaya Udang Windu. Makalah Seminar Sehari Mahasiswa IMA FPIK IPB tanggal 20 April 2002. Widigdo, B., R.F. Kaswadji., J.I. Pariwono., S. Haruyadi., A.D. Patria., G. Rakasiwi., A. Tautusman., 2. Imran. 2000. Penyusunan Kriteria Ekobiologis untuk Pemulihan dan Pelestarian Kawasan Pesisir di Panturn Jawa Barat. Laporan Akhir. Kerjasama PKSPL IPB dan Dirjen Urusan Pesisir Pantai, d m Pulaupulau Kecil, DKP. P 11-9 Wilson. G. James. 1988. The BioIogy of Estuarine Management C m m Helm Ltd.
London Yamaji, I. E. 1966. Illustration of the Marine Plankton of Japan. Publishing Co.Ltd. Osaka. Japan.
Hoikusha
Lampiran 1. Data kualitas air Muara Sungai Randangan, Kecamatan Marisa, Kabupaten Pohuatu, Provinsi Gorontalo Pengamatan tanggal 6 Oktober 2002.
1
I PARAMETER
tr
B Z
I uan IT-A 29.5 13
Iff-A
17 26 20
6
1
1
I
1 2 3 4
5 6 7
Suhu *I Kekeruhan Padatan tersuspensl ITSS) Salinitas *) Kecerahan *) pH*) Oksiqen terlarut (DO)
8
BOD5
9
COD
10 11 12 13
NH3-N (NH3+NH4)
1 Nitrat (NO3-N)
Nitfit (NOz-N) Orto~hosphat
14
Raksa (HQ)
15
c02
*I
1
6 5.83
7.0
13.57
0.02
0.009
0.03 0.019
0.042 0.018 0.04
0.025 11.99
Pengamatan tanggal 6 Oktober 2002.
I
8.0 5.8 1.60 12.57
0.019
I
29.9
5.3 1.40
0.075 15.98
I
1 Suhu *) Kekeruhan Padatan tersuspensi (fSS) Salinitas *I Kecerahan *) nH *I Oksiqen terlarut (DO) *) BOD5 COD NH3-N (NH3+NH4) Nitmt (NO3-N) Nitrlt [NOI-N) Omwhosphat Raksa (Hg)
Lampiran 2. Data jenis dan kelimpahan phytoplankton (Indll) di Perairan Muara Sungai Randangan, Kecamatan Marisa, Kabupaten Pohuato, Provinsi Gorontalo
Kelas Dino h mae
hridlniwn
Lampiran 3. Data jenis dan kelimpahan zooplankton(Ind/l) di Perairan Muara Sungai Randangan, Kecmatan Marisa, Kabupaten Pohuato, Provinsi Gorontalo
.
Jumlah tndhridu
10
20
5
29
lndeks Ksanekaragarnan
0.61086
0.73059
0.67301
1.0753
lndeks banekarmaman
0
0.56234
0.90028
0.86757
0.5004
109.881
190.6t5
146.481
Indeks Keseraflaman
0
0.81 128
0.81945
0.78S9
0.72393
0.99999
0.97957
0.91014
Lndeks Dmninansi
1
0.625
0.48875
0.50001
0.68
0.33333
0.15625
0.25825
Lampiran 4. Nilai akar ciri, vektor ciri, dan Korelasi (F 1 dan F2) saat pasang
kar ciri dan vektor cilri mn~amatantanaaal6 Oktober 2002
Akar Ciri
I,
824221
5,0145
51.51361
3 1.3409
8,24221
13,2567
5 1,5 1361
82,8545
0,9868
-0,1185
-0,4228
-0,6078
-0,2723
-0,957 1
5% Total Keragaman
11,
1
In, Akar Ciri Kumulativ
IV,
% Kumuhtiv
V, Vektor Ciflariabel 1, Suhu
2, Kekeruhan 3. TSS
Analisis komponen utama terhadap letak stasiun pada tanggal 6 Oktober 2002 ~o,l$tasiun Sumbu 1 (Fl) Sumbu 2 (F2) Vektor Ciri Korelslsi Vektor Ciri i~orelasi 1 I-B -2.29807 0-54 1 123 0.375321 0.014433 I
1
I
Korelasi antar variabel dan sumbu utamrt tanggal 6 Oktober 2002 Sumbu 1 (Fl) Sumbu 2 (F2) No, V a ~ b e l Vektor Ciri Korelasi Vektor Ciri Korelaai I, 0,9737 0,9868 -0,1185 0,9877 2, Suhu -0,4228 0,1788 -0,6078 0,5482 3, Kekemhan
14, Orto-Phosfat
0,9742
0,9490
15, c% 16, Phytoplanton 1 7. Zooplankton
0,5062 -0,1277 -0,5832
0,2562
0,0163 0,340 1
-0,0762 -0,8322 0,763 1 0.77791
0,9548 0,9487
0,5987
0.9453
Akar ciri dan vektor ciri pengarnatan tanggal 8 Oktober 2002 l~umbu1 (Fl) I~umbu2 @2) No.ITEM I. Akar Ciri 8,7627961
4,830919
54.767481
3 0,19324
I
8-762801I
13.59372
1
54,76751
84,9607
11. % Total Keragaman
1 IU. Akar Ciri Kumulativ
TV.% Kumulativ
0,609623
0,778423
0,40 1 493
0,910121
11. N O 3 4
-0,473282
0,835727
12. N02-N 1 3. Orto-Phosfat
-0,966335
0,2435 16
-0,887 142
-0,05 1041
0,972016
-0,151757
-0,940487
-0,282606 -0,308 146
2. Kekeruhan 3. TSS
.. .-..-
14. co2
15. Phytoplanton 16. Zooplankton
0,807228
8 Oktober 2002
Akar ciri dan vektor ciri pengatnatan tanggal 9 Oktober 2002 I (FI) 2 (~2) ko. ITEM I. Akar Ciri
ISU~~U
ISU~~U
II. % Total Keragaman 54.,7641
28,8372
8,68421
13.2982
54.,7641
83,1136
-0,9857 0,7779 0,402 1 0,9906 0,2876 0,7088 0,93 74
0,0274 0,4103 0,883 1
III. Akar Ciri Kumulativ
IV.
1%
Kumulntiv
I
V. Vektor CirWariabel 1. Suhu 2. Kekeruhan 3. TSS 4. Salinitas 5. Kecerahan 6.pH 7.DO 8. BOD? 9. COD
15. Phytoplanton
16. Zooplankton
I
-0,0243 0,0456 -0,6270
0,3453
-0,446 1
0,8270
0,5477
0,7072
-0,88 13 -0,8 128
0,4113 -0,2479
Analisis komponen utama terhadap letak stasiun pada tanggal 9 Oktober 2002 NO.[~tasiun Sumbu 1 (F1) Sumbu 2, (F2) I~ektorCiri Korelasi Vektor ~iril~orelrmsi 1 .11-B 1 1.84079 0.294226 2.7364810.6502 14 1,76387 0,287870 -2,49773 0,577234 2.11-B 3.111-B 0,75267 0,086972 -0,32720 0,O 16436 4. IV-B -4.3573410.990850 0.08844~0.000408
1
Lampiran 4. Lanjutan...
Korelasi antar variabel dan surnbu utama tanggal 9 Oktober 2002 I~o.l~ariabel Sumbu 1 (Fl) Sumbu 2 (F2) Korelasi Vektor Ciri Korelasi Vektor Ciri 0,9724 -0,9857 0,971 7 0,0274 1. Suhu 0,7779 0,4 103 0,6051 0,7734 2, Kekeruhan
1
-
9. COD I 0.NH3-N
0,5477
0,3000
0,7072
0,8001
0,3800
0,1444
0,9147
0,98 10
1 1. N03-N
-0,9437
0,8905
0,2926
0,9761
Lampiran 5 . Matrik korelasi antar variabel pada saat pasang
Pengamatan tanggal 6 Oktober 2002
I
1 1
Solinitas Kamrahan
1
1
)
1
C02
I 1
"
Phyto
Zoo
varkhl Suhu
Suhu Keruhon 1,0000oo~
C02
0.623137 0.0,636091 -0.348529 -0,168985 0,762797 -0,451951 0,330977 0,485591 0,025637 4,405795 0,848238 0.6W683 1,000MX) 4,286562 -0,835660 -0,632662 0,009187 -0,125447 -0,694392 4,0421 54 4,193617 0,148785 -0,504412 -0,014858 4.281 135 4,317207 -0.843174 1,000000 4.641872 -0.068948 -0.608991 0.413173 0.227836 -0.739894 0.671972 -0.213911 0.756636 0.431721 0.544920 -0.695392 4.577672 -0.889538 0.5lgsOZ 1
mflo 200
TSS
pH
00
1
BOD5
COO
1
NH3-N
N03-N
NO24
Orto-Pho
-.
Pengaxnatan tanggal 8 Oktober 2002 Suhu
~a-1 Suhu
Ksruhan
Phyto 200
Ksruhan
TSS
Salinitaa Kewrahan
pH
00
BOD5
COD
NH3-N
N03-N
N02-N
OmPho
C02
Phyto
Zoo
1,000000 -0,261785 1,OMWXK) -0.047088 0,968549 1,000000
1 (
0,7034221 -0,82 15871 -0,6541291 -0,9796681 -0,4857271 -0,389073) -0,4611351 0,3077171 -0,1171 771 0,9577841 0,158372( 0,8558791 0,9353331 -0,9051231 1,0000001 -0,6738591 0,327612( 0,095192) 0,8545661 -0,137087) -0,287334) -0,1469031 -0,517921 0. t 807071 -0,833493) - 0 , 4 9 9 3 ~ 1-0,8968971 -0,9312981 0,9216731 -0,7671121 1,
1
1
o q
I
oflud
1
103
1 WdWO 1
N-ZON
1
NSON
1
N-CHN
1
a03
1
W08
1
OC]
I
nd
1 u . u w ~I ww~msI
S S ~ 1 uwww I 2002 JaqOMO 6 f l
nuns
1 iw~nJ
m ~~~~~d
Lampiran 6 . Nilai akar ciri, vektor ciri, dan korelasi (F1 clan F2) pada saat surut Akar ciri dan vektor ciri pengamatan tanggal 6 Oktober 2002 Isumbu 1 (Fl) ( ~ u m b 2u (F2) No. lTEM
I.
Akar Ciri 9,77951
3,6131
61,12221
22,58 16
9,77951
13,3926
61,12221
83,7037
0,9691 -0,8369 -0,9594
0,1250 0,5270
-0,6795
0,0203 0,7603
II. % Total Kemgaman
IIX. Akar Ciri Kumulativ IV. % Kumulativ
V. Veldor CirWariabel 1. Suhu
2. Kekeruhan 3. TSS
9. COD 10.NH3-N
0,6102
13. Orto-Phosfat
0,9 f 40
14. co2 15. Phytoplanton 16. Zooplankton
0,5 503
-0,9478
-0,8897
0,2649
-0,3752 -0,6569
-0,2892 0,0116
Analisis komponen utama terhadap let& stasiun pada tanggal 6 Oktober 2002 No. I~tasiun ] Sumbu I (Fl) Sumbu 2 (F2) Vektor Ciri Korelasi Vektor Ciri I ~ o r e b s i -3,19652 0,763466 1 I-B 0,288721 0,006229 1,03040 0,127 139 2 11-B -1,727571 0,357385 1,045521 0,124378 -2,76004 0,866780 3 III-B 1.44092 0.1 18798 4 IV-B 3.878571 0.860746
I
I
1
I
I
Lampiran 6. Lanjutan...
Koreiasi antar variabel dan sumbu ~tamatanggal 6 Oktober 2002 Sumbu 2 (F2) No. Variabel I Sumbu . (Fl) Korelasi kektor Ciri Korelasi Vektor Ciri I
I
0.939227
9. COD
-0,679546
10.NH3-N
0,610167
15. phytoplmton 16. Zooplankton
-0,947829
-0,889665
0.12501 6
0.954856
Akar ciri dan vektor ciri pengamatan tanggal 8 Oktober 2002 No. ITEM $umbu 1 (Fl) l ~ u m b u2 (F2) I. Akar Ciri 6,6 1631 5,6663 11. % Total Keragaman
I
41,35 171
I
35,4141
I
111.I~karCiri Kumulativ
IV.% Kumulativ 41,35171
76,7658 -0,3 5 37
2. Kekeruhan
-0,913 1 0,703 3
15. Phytoplanton 16. Zooplankton
-0,1493 -0,9424
0,7552 0,3244
V. Vektor CirilVariabel
I
1. Suhu
-0,4093
Analisis komponen utama terhadap letak stasiun pada tanggal 8 Oktober 2002 NO. I~tPsiun ~ u m b uI PI) ~ u m b u2 ( ~ 2 ) Vektor Ciri Korelasi Vektor Ciri Korelasi 1. I-I3 1,4503 0,2141 1,2499 0,1590 I
I
I
I
Korelasi antar variabel dm sumbu utama tanggal 8 Oktober 2002 I~aria be1 Sumbu X (Fl) Sumbu 2 (F') Vektor Ciri Korelasi Vektor Ciri Korelasi 0,8337 -0,913 1 -0.3537 0.9588 1. SUhu
INO,
I
1
7.DO
0,4590
0,2 107
8. BODS 9. COD
0,1331 0.4382
0,0177 0.1920
0.4577 0.9910
0.89391
0.4202
0.9998 0.9911
Akar ciri dan vektor ciri pengamatan tanggal 9 Oktober 2002 No. ITEM l~umbu1 (Fl) Isumbu 2 (F2) Akar Ciri I. 7,6 1641 5,3561 11. % Total Keragaman 47,60241 33,4753 r Ciri Kumula
I
+ I
IV.
V.
% Kumulativ
Vektor CirWariabel 1. Suhu 2. Kekeruhan 3. TSS
8. BOD5
9. COD
14. co2 15. Phytoplanton 16. Zooplankton
47,60241
8 1,0777
0,9362 0,854 1 0,6230
0,3515 -0,5 190 0,3473
-0,7847 0,4407
-0,1312
-0,7862
0,4509
0,5390 -0,1915
0,5587 0,909 I
-0,8798
Analisis kornmnen utarna terhadat, letak stasiun ~ a d tananal a 9 Oktober 2002 No. Stasiun Sumbu 1 (Fl) Sumbu 2 (F2) Vektor Ciri I~orelasi Vektor Ciri [~orelasi
Korelasi antar variabel dan surnbu utama tanggal 8 Oktober 2002 Sumbu 2 (R2) Sumbu 1 (F1) No. Variabel Vektor Ciri korehsi Vaktor Ciri Korelpsi 0,3515 0,9362 0,8765 1,0000 1. Suhu 0,7295 0,9988 -0,5 190 2.l ~keruhan e 0,854 1
9.COD 10.NH3-N
11.NO3-N 13. Orto-Phosfat 14. CO2
1 5. Phytoplanton 16. Zooplankton
0,4407
0,1942
-0,8798
0,9683
-0,4027 -0,7865
0,1622
-0,5229
0,4356
0,6 186
-0,5938
0,971 2
0,6443 -0,7862 0,5390 -0.1 915
0,4152
-0,71 5 8
0,9276
0,6 18 1 0,2905 0,03671
0,4509
0,82 15 0,6027 0.8632
0,5587
0,9091
Lampiran 7. Matrik Korelasi antar variabel pada saat surut
I
9EStO-P- 90L160S'IZ 9E810'P 90LlmS'IZ 8SLOO'P- 908Z90P'I Z LZ6tO.b I8L9EZL'IZ
ZSPIGEP6IZ PZ86LIO.O ZSP16EP6IZ PZ86LIO-0 88fLE96L6 1 PLL I 8 10'0 [OILZOPCILZ ELSLLIO'O
095056229I IZSE'I E 0950E6ZZ91 IZSE'I 2 ]0950E6ZZ91 6612'1 - 1 ~OOWPPELLIPEES'I 9
V
I1
Larnpiran 7. Lanjutan. Penematan taneeal8 Oktober 2002 Variahl
I
suhu
I
( l.ooool
COD
)
-0,69701
NH3-N
1
0.93551
Suhu
Keruhan
I
I
TSS
1
Salinitas
I Kecerahan I
I
I
-0,00281
0,88391
-0.32761
-0.31611
-0.74481
-0.10051
-0.1765
I
] I
1
-0,17861
0,68221
-0.77891
-0.10461
0.81761
pH
DO
[ I
I
I
1
( 1
0,94551
1,00001
I
-02106! -0.43401
1.0000!
BOD5
COD
NH3-N
I
N03-N
1 I
NO2-N
I OrtHM 1 I
1
I
1
C02
I I
Ph)to
I 1
1
Zoo
Pengamatan tanggal 9 Oktober 2002 Suhu
Variakl
Suhu
TSS
1,0000 0,6172 0,7057
Satlnitas
0,7625
Kwuban
Kcccrahan
-0,9806 0.3015 -0,3208 -0.7805 0,1033
PH
DO BODS COD NH3-N yo:
-0,5605 - ,I < I
,
Kcruhan 0.6172
TSS 0,7057 03761 1.0000 0,89Q2 0,5737 0,0580 0,1440 -0,1099 -0,1558 0,0940
1,0000
0,3761 0.7530 -0,6993 0.9305
0,3761 -0,5812
0.8268 -0.W66 -..:A
,,.:I
Salinitas
.[,
\ ,
-
0.7625
0,7530 0,8902 1,0000
Kccmhm
pH
DO
4,9806 -0,6993
0,3015
-0,5737
0.0580 0,5058
-0,3208 0,3761 0,1440
-0,7071
4,7071 0,5058 0,3424 -0,3109
1,OW -0,4271 0,3210 0,8754 0,3080 0,2514 0.1052 0,6182 -1 ->(I{, - n.Nh62 - . , -.: 1 j
0,9305
0,3424
0,3210 0,4271 0,5222 1,0000 1,0000 0,5222 -0,4273 0,5278 0,9748 0,5413 0,9016 0,1040 -0 0063 0.7921 . .- -. . - . -
..
!
;\.
I.
)~TI
BOD5 4.7805 4,5812 -0,1099
-0,3109 0.8754 -0,4273 0,5278 1,0000 -0,3383 0,8397 0,5923 0
COD
NH3-N
0,1033 0,8268 -0,1558
-0,5605 -0,0466
0,3080
-0,2514 0,9748 0,5413 -0,3383 1,0000 0,1488 0.2060 I I3
N03-N
0,0940
-0,3694 -0,8151
-0,9623 -0,4157 -0,8025
0,1052
-0.7206
-0,7337
0,6182
0.8662
0,8931
0,tW
-0,0063
0,9016
0,3921
4,0580 03827
0,8397 0,1488
0,5923 0,2060
0,6300 0,1536
1,0000
0,4W8 1.0000 0.9984)
0,5144
0,4998 11 1; 1441 - -
-0,9451
--
,
< y !I ,
, I -.
.--..-
1'1
JLUU
; :I
I
I
L.4
.JU]
':I -<.,:>*h?l
1
-~,u~J-II
-u,-q,j>il
6
I
1
... - 1
.,
'1
--
1
-V,~UZLJ
-.
'U
I1.ll3b
-
I
-{l.0591
-0. I 144
-0.3663 .-
4,9252
-0,1930
-0,8184
N02-N
.
0rto-h OJ515 0,9125
0,1922 0,9716
4,6182 -OW9
-0,4402
0,7716
0,7176
-0,5513 -0,1540 -0.0592 4,1144 4,3663 -0,0357
4.4057 0,0768
0,3462 -0,5748
4,0370 0,8138 -0,8185 0,3983 0J789
-0,87W
0,9984
0,9617 -0,0874 -0,0360
I
-0+W:,5,1 0,333:I
U,3333 -0,8413
-U,W31 4.2223
-0,6761
-0,2964
-0,6746
-0,3264
0,8909 -0,0370
~,2983 0,27&9 -0,0357 --0.R626 ..
-.
Phyto 0,7013
-0.0358 0,dlW 0,4982 0,9788
.OF-
W
CO2 4,5774
1,UUOO
- 0,0445 0,4042
0,1400
-0,8626
-0,8022 -0,92S2 -0,1930 4.8184 4,6761 0,3264
-0,84131
-0.29641
.n ?',:
- 4 ) (%;~t,
l.flnn0.
C),4W2 0.1715 --
0,1715
1,0000
0,0945
Data musirn hujan, stasiun 2 (mdut sungai sunmi) ~HAN ~BLOKIULANGAN~C (Kd) IQ (man) I v g ( m )
Lampiran 9. Ringkasan hasil regresi 1. Analisis regresi untuk stasiun 1 saat musim kemarau Regression Slrrlislics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations
0,92 1239674 0,848682537 0,846520859
0,003963658 72
ANOVA
dS Regression Residual Total
1 70 71
SS 0,0061 6803 0,OO 1 099741 0,007267771
0,00616803 1,57 106E-05
F
Significance F
392,603579
t Stat Standard Error -2,505885622 0,076443462 -32,780901 73 -0,070256912 0,003545781 - 19,B1422668 Coeficienfs
Intercept X Variable 1
MS
2,03477E-30
Lower 95,0% Upper 95,0% Upper 95% Lower 95% -2,6583471 76 -2,353424069 -2,353424069 3,28752E-44 -2,65 8347 1 76 2,03477E-30 -0,077328744 -0,06318508 -0,077328744 -0,06318508 P-value
Lampiran 9. Lanjutan.. . 2. Analisis Regresi untuk stasiun 2 saat musim kemarau Re~ressionStatisria
0,695876663
R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations
0,48424433 0,476876392 0,0095I9401 72
ANOVA Regression .Residual Total
1
70 7I Coeficients
Intercept X Variable 1
F Signrficance F 1,16048E-11 0,005955769 0,005955769 65,72318077 9,061 9E-05 0,00634333 0,O 12299099 SS
df
-3,453635383 -0,026166772
MS
Lower 9 5 , W Upper 950% P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% I Stat -3,3 15327486 -3,591 94328 -3,3 15327486 2,14599E-56 -339 194328 -49,8023 1 124 0,06934689 0,003227683 -8,106983457 1,16048E-1I -0,032604177 -0,O 19729366 -0,032604177 -0,019729366
Standard Error
Lampiran 9. Lanjutan... 2. Analisis regresi untuk stasiun 1 saat musirn hujan Regression Statistics
Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations
0,92 1239674 0,848682537 0,846520859
0,003963658
72
ANOVA 27 0,00616803 0,OO 1099741 0,007267771
df Regression Residual Total
I
70 71
Coeflcients Intercept
X Variable I
Standard Error
-2,023235408 -0,070256912
0,080338832 0,00354578 1
MS 0,00616803 137 106E-05
t Stat
-25,18377929 -1 9,s 1422668
F 392,603579
P-value 8,1003 1E-37 2,03477E-30
Sign8cance F
2,03477E-30
Upper 95% Lower 95,OOA Upper 95,Wo -2,183466024 -1,863004791 -2,183466024 -1,863004791 -0,077328744 -0,063 18508 -0,077328744 -0,06318508
Lower 95%
Lampiran 9. Lanjutan. ..
2. Analisis regresi untuk stasiun 2 saat rnusim hujan Regression Stafhtics
Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square
Standard Error Observations
0,695 876663
0,48424433 0,476876392 0,009519401 72
ANOVA SS
df Regression Residual Total
1
70 71
Coefficients Standard Error
Intercept X Variable 1
-3,019423 138 -0,026 166772
MS
F
0,005955769 0,005955769 65,723 18077 0,00634333 9,0619E-05 0,012299099 t Stat
0,07289242 -41,42300567 0,003227683
-8,106983457
Signficartce F
1,16048E-1I
Lower 95,0% Upper 950% P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% -3,164802367 -2,874043909 -2,874043909 5,62345E-51 -3,164802367 1,16048E-11 -0,032604177, -0,019729366,-0,032604177 -0.019729366
Lampiran 10. Tabulasi jumlah jenis setiap stasiun, keanekaragaman (H') dan kekayaanjenis (R) Untuk kategori pohon
Lampiran 11. Perhitungan manfaat ekosistem mangrove di Muara Sungai Randangan, Kecamatan Marisa, Kabupaten Pohuato, Provinsi Gorontalo
anfaat kelelawnr
Lampiran 12. Perhitungan biaya ekosistem mangrove di Muara Sungai Randangan, Kecamatan Marisa, Kabupaten Pohuato, Provinsi Gorontalo
I In2 ModJ Kwir-P 3 ImPanoMMM 4 Mdd K q a P m d h u n
ILnvcma'PdObu 6ModJKmuPmhDht
95.217 02
91.217 02
95.217 02
95.21 7 02
I.Wl.791 33
l,Wl,7q13 3
t.001.791 3 3
1.001,791 33
95.11702 24.m92 I,Wl.iVS 33
I,WH.79533
271.750 00
273,750 00
271,7M 00
275.750 00
273,750 00
171.750 MI
P5,21702
95317m
95,21702
95.2 1102
95317 01
I,[W11,7H 33
1,W1,7V533
I.WI.795 33
1.001.IPS33
273.710 00
173,750 W
ln.7~0 MI
1 1 273.754M)
Lampiran 14.. Kuntifikasi ntmus model ekologi-ekonomi pengembangan tambak di Muara Sungai Randangan, Kecarnatan Marisa, Kabupaten Pohuato, Provinsi Gorontalo
Sub Sistem Estuaria Kum-Laju-N03_N_Estu(t> = Kum-Laj u_N03-N-Estu(t - dt) + (TotLaju-N03-N-Est - Laju-N03-N-Est Laj-N03-N-Laut)
-
TNFLOWS: Tot-Laju-N03-N-Est
* dt
=
Output-NO3-N-dari_Limbah_Tam+Out-NO3-N-dr_Mang+Out-NO3-N_dr_Sed OUTFLOWS: Laju7N03-N_Est = Kum-Laj~-N03-N-Estu*Frak_in-N03~Est Laj-N03-N-Laut = KumLaju-N03_NEstu* Flushing-Rate Kurn_NH3_N_Mang(t) = Kum-NH3-N-Mang(t - dt) + (In-NH3-N-Mang)
INFLOWS: In NH3-N-Mang = Output-N-AnorgMang* Fraksi-NH3-N-Mang K--NHJ-N-s~~(~) = Kum-NH3-N-Sed(t - dt) + (In-NH3-N-Sed)
* dt
* dt
INFLOWS: In-NH3-N-Sed = Out-N-Anorg-Sed*Frak_NH3-N-Sed Kum-NH3_N_Tam(t) = KurnNH3_N_Tarn(t - dt) + (Input-NH3-N-Tam)
* dt
INFLOWS: Input-NH3 -N-Tam = Fraksi-NH3-N-Tm*Output-N-Anorganik-Tambak Kum-N02-N-Mang(t) = Kum-N02N_Mang(t - dt) + (InJ02-N-Mang)
* dt
INFLOWS:
In-N02-N-Mmg = Output-N-Anorg-Mmg*Frak-N02-N-Mang Kum-NO2 -N-Sed(t) = KumN02_N_Sed(t - dt) + (In-N02-N-Sed)
* dt
INFLOWS: In-N02-N-Sed = Out-NAnorg-Sed* Frak-N02-N-Sed Kum-N02-N-Tam(t) = Kum-N02N_Tam(t - dt) + (Input-N02-N)
* dt
INFLOWS: Input-N02-N = Fraksi-N02-NTam*Output-N- Anorganik-Tambak Kum-N03-N-Mang(t) = Kum-N03-N-Mang(t - dt) + (In-N03-N-Mang Out_N03-N-dr-Mang) * dt
-
INFLOWS: In-N03-N-Mang = Output-N-AnorgMang Frak-N03-N-Mang OUTFLOWS: Out-N03-N-drMang = Kum-N03N_Mang* Frek-Psgqerhr Kum-NO3-N-Sed(t) = K m 0 3 - N - S e d ( t - dt) + (InN03-N-Sed Out-N03-Xdr-Sed) * dt
INFLOWS: In-N03-N-Sed = 0ut-N-Anor g-Sed* Frak-NO3-Sed OUTFLOWS: Out N03-N-dr-Sed = Kum-N03-N-Sed*Frek-Psgger-hr KGNO3-N-Tarnbak(t) = Kum-NO3NTambak(t - dt) + (Input-N03-N 0 u t ~ $ ~ 0 3 - ~ - d a r i - ~ i m b a h - ~ r n*) dt
INFLOWS: Input N03-N
=
OUTFLOWS:
-
Output-N-Anorganik-Tambak*Fr&~i~NO3~N~Tm
Output N03-N-dari-Limbah-Tam = ~ u r n - k 3 - ~ - ~ a m b a kpersen-~er~antian-~ir * Kum-N-Anorg-Mang(t) = Kum-N-Anorg-Mang(t - dt) + (N-Anorg -Mang Output-N_Anorg-Mang) * dt
INFLOWS: N-Anorg-Mang OUTFLOWS:
= Output-N-dari-Mang*Fraksi-N-Anorg-Mag
Output-N-Anorg-Mang = Kum-N-Anorg-Mang*Fraksi N-Mang Kum-N-Anarg-Sed(t) = Kum-N-Anorg-Sed(t - dt) + -Anorg-Sed Out-N-Anorg-Sed) * dt
m-
INFLOWS: N-Anorg-Sed = 0ut-N-dr-Sed * Frak_N-Anorg-Sed OUTFLOWS: Out-N-Anorg-Sed = Kum-N-Anorg -Sed*Frak-N-An-OrgOut -Sed
Kum_N-di-Sed(t)
= Kum_Ndi-Sed(t
- Out-N-dr_Sed) * dt
- dt) + (In-N-di-Sed
MFLOWS: In-N-di-Sed = Out-Laju-Sed* Frak_N-dlm-Sed OUTFLOWS: Out-N-dr-Sed = Rum-N-di-Sed Kurn-N-Mangrove(t) = Kum-N-Mangrove(t - dt) + (N-diMang Output-N-dari-Mang) * dt
-
MFLOWS: N-diMang = LajuN-Mang-Laju-N-Mangkon OUTFLOWS: Output-N-dari-Mang = KumN-Mangrove Kum-N-Org-Mang(t) = Kurn-N-Org-Mang(t - dt) + (N-Org-Mang)
INFLOWS: N-Org-Mang = Output-N-dari-Mang*Fraksi-N-Org-Mang Kum-N_Org-Sed(t) = Kum-N-Org_Sed(t - dt) + (N-Org-Sed)
dt
* dt
rNFLOWS: N-Org_Sed = Out-N-dr-Sed*Frak-N-Org-Sed Kum-Sed-Sungai(t) = Kum-Sed-Sungai(t - dt) + (Laju-Sed - Out-Laju-Sed) * dt
NIT Kum_Sed-Sungai
= Laju-Sed
INFLOWS: Laju Sed = Jum-Hari * Laju-Rerata
OUTFLOWS:
OutLaju-Sed = Kum-Sed-Sungai Laju-Kum-N03_N_Laut(t) = Laju-Kum-N03-N-Laut(t * dt INIT Laju-Kum-N03-N-Laut
dt) + (LajN03-N- Laut)
=0
rNFLOWS: Laj NO3-N-Laut = Kum-Laju-N03-N-Estu*FIushing_Rate ~lushing-~ate = 0.6 Fraksi-NH3-N-Mang = 0.70 Fraksi-NH3-N-Tam = 0.7 Fraksi-N02_N_Tam = 0.05
Fraksi-N03-N-Tam = 0.25 F&i-N_Anorg-Mang = 0.80 Fraksi-N-Mang = 116 Frak-in-N03-Est = 0.4 Frak NH3-N-Sed = 0.70 ~ r a k : ~ 0 2 - ~ - ~ =a 0.05 n~ FraLN02-N-Sed = 0.05 Frak-N03-N-Mang = 0.25 FraLN03-Sed = 0.25 Frak N-Anorg-Sed = 0.80 ~ r a k I ~ ~ ~ n - ~ r ~ -=~1/6 ut-~ed Frak-N-dlm-Sed = 0.50 Frak-N-Org-Sed = 0.20 Jum Hari = 120 {hari) ~ aU>j Mang = Luas-Mang *Laju-N-di-Mang ~ su j- ~ I ~ a n ~ k=oLuas-Tambak'Laj n u-N-dj-Mang Laju Rerata = 0.01773 (Kg/hari) ~ u g ~ =a2272.03 n ~ (ha) ~erse%-~er~antian_~ir = IF(TIME=I )TH EN(O)ELSE(IF(TIME<=60)THEN(O.O3)ELSE(IF(TIME<=9O)THEN (0.l)ELSE(IF(TIME= 120)THEN(l OO)ELSE(O. 15)))) Laju-N-di-Mang = GRAPH(Hari_Mang) (1.00,0.029), (2.00,0.029), (3.00,0.029), (4.00,0.029), (5.00,0.029), (6.00,0.029), (7.00,0.029), (8.00,0.029), (9.00, 0.029), (10.0, 0.0291, (1 1.0,0.029), (12.0, 0.029), (13.0,0.029), (l4.0,0.029), (15.0,0.029), (16.0,0.029), (17.0,0.029), (18.0,0.029), (19.0,0.029),(20.0,0.029),(21.0,0.029),(22.0,0.029),(23.0,0.029),(24.0,0.029), (25.0,0.029), (26.0,0.029), (27.0,0.029), (28.0,0.029), (29.0,0.029), (30.0,0.029), (31.0, 0.029), (32.0,0.029), (33.0, 0.029), (34.0,0.029), (35.0,0.029), (36.0, 0.029), (37.0,0.029), (38.0,0.029), (39.0,0.029), (40.0,0.029), (4 1.0,0.029), (42.0,0.029), (43.0,0.029), (44.0,0.029), (45.0,0.029), (46.0,0.029), (47.0,0.029), (48.0,0.029), (49.0,0.029),.(50.0,0.029),(5I.0,0.029), (52.0,0.029), (53.0,0.029), (54.0,0.029), (55.0,0.029),(56.0,0.029), (57.0,0.029), (58.0, 0.029), (59.0, 0.0291, (60.0,0.029), (61.0,0.029),(62.0,0.029), (63.0,0.029), (64.0,0.029), (65.0,0.029), (66.0,0.029), (67.0,0.029),(68.0,0.029),(69.0,0.029),(70.0,0.029),(7~.0,0.029),(72.0,0.029), (73.0,0.029), (74.0,0.029), (75.0, 0.029), (76.0,0.029), (77.0,0.029), (78.0,0.029). (79.0,0.029), (80.0,0.029), (81.0, 0.029), (82.0, 0.029), (83.0,0.029), (84.0, 0.0291, (85.0,0.029), (86.0,0.029), (87.0,0.029), (88.0,0.029), (89.0, 0.029), (90.0, 0.029). (91.0,0.029),(92.0,0.029), (93.0,0.029), (94.0,0.029),(95.0,0.029), (96.0, 0.029), (97.0,0.029),(98.0,0.029),(99.0,0.029),(100,0.029),(10I,0.029j, (102,0.029), (103,0.029),(104, 0.029), (105, 0.029), (106, 0.029), (107, 0.0291, (108, 0.029), (109, 0.029), (110,0.029),(111,0.029), (112,0.029), (113,0.029), (114,0.029), ( 1 15, 0.029),(116,0.029),(117,0.029),(118,0.029),(119,0.029),(120,0.029),(121, 0.029)
Lampiran 14. Lanjutan ...
Sub Sistem Tambak Km-Kon-N03-N-Tam(t) * dt
INFLOWS: Kon-N03-N-Tam
= Kon-N03-N-Pantai
Kum-N-Anorg-Tambak(t) (N-Anorganik-Tambak
- dt) + (Kon-N03-N-Tam)
= Kum-Kon-N03_N-Tam(t
= Kum-N-Anorg-Tarnbak(t
- dt) +
- Output-N-Anorgani k-Tambak)
* dt
INFLOWS: N-Anorganik-Tarnbak = Out-Total-N-drTam * Fraksi-N- Anorganik-Tambak OUTFLOWS: Output-N-horganik-Tambak = Kum-N-Anorg-Tambak* Fraksi-N-Tambak Kum-N-Org_Tarnbak(t) = Kum-N-Org-Tmbak(t - dt) + (N-Urganik-Tambak) * dt
INFLOWS: N-Organik Tambak = Out-Total-N-dr-Tam* Fraksi-N-Organik ~ u r n _ ~ - ~ & n=( tKum-N_Tam(t ) - dt) + (In-Total -N - Out-Total-N-dr-Tam)
INFLOWS: In-TotalN = Out-TSS*Fraksi-N -Tam OUTFLOWS: Out-Total-N-dr-Tam = Kum N-Tarn Kum-Pakan(t) = ~ u m _ ~ a k a n-(dt) t + (Dosis-Pakangerhari)
* dt
INFLOWS: Dosis-Pakan9er-hari = Dosis-Pakanger-hariger-ha * L uas-Tarn bak Kum_TSS(t) = Kum-TSS(t - dt) -1- (TSSqer-hari) * dt
INFLOWS: TSSqer-hari = Dosis-Pakanger-hari* 0.35 Kum-TSS-Tambak(t) = Kum-TSS-Tambak(t - dt) + (In-TSS - Out-TSS)
* dt
* dt
INFLOWS: In TSS = (TSSger-hari * 1OOO)/OuttakeeatauUVol-Air-Buangan
OUTFLOWS:
Out-TSS = KuQSS-Tambak Laju+Kum_NO3-N-Panhi(t) = Laju-Kwn-N03_N_Pantai(t m03-N-Ke-Pantai - Kon-N03-N-Pantai) * dt
INIT Laju-Kurn-N03-N-Pantai
- dt) +
=0
INFLOWS: N03-N-Ke-Pantai = Laju-N03-N-Est OUTFLOWS: Kon-N03-N-Pantai = (LajuLKum_N03-N-Pantai* 1 000000)I(Vol~AirTersedia*1000) (ppm) VolTarnbak(t) = Vol-TarnbakCt dt) + (Val-Intake - Vol-Air-SisaTarnbak)
-
* dt
INIT Vol-Tambak = VoI-Air-Tambak-Maks INFLOWS: Vol-Intake = Vol-Air-Sisa-Tambak OUTFLOWS: Vol-Air-Sisa-Tarnbak = Vol-Tambak*O. 1 *Persen-Peramtian-Air Dosis-Pakmger-harijer-ha = Dosis-Pakanger-hrger-05-ha* 2 Fraksi-N-Anorganik-Tambak = 0.80 Fraksi N-Organik = 0.20 ~ r a k s i I ~ - ~ a=r 0.5 n Fraksi-N-Tambak = 416 Frek-Psgger-hr = 2 Hari-Tarnbak = COUNTER(1,121) Jmgka-air-Psg = 578 (m) Kemiringan = 15 Kisaran-Pasut = 8.125 {m) Luas-Tambak = Vol Air-Tambak-Maks/l0000 ~ u n a k e - a t a u - ~ o l - ~ r - ~ u a n= ~ aVol n -Tarnbak '0.9 Panjang-Grs-Pantai = 8300 {m ) Radian-Kemiringan = Kerniringan*(PI/180) Target Prod-Maks = (2 *2 160)*Luas-Tarn bak ~ a r ~ e * o d - ~ i n = 2 1 6O*Luas_Tarnbak TSSqer hrger-05-ha = 0.35*Dosis-Pakanger-hjer 05-ha ~ol-~ir_;li-~antai = 0.5 *~isaran-~asut*~anjan~-~rs~~antai* ((z* ~ a n ~ k a - a i r - ~ s ~ l -
(Kisaran-Pasut/TAN(Radian_Kemiringan)))
VolAir-Tarnbak Maks = 0.1 * Vol-AirTersedia ~ o l - ~ i r - ~ e r s c dFrek i ~ =-Psgper-hr* Val-Air-di-Pantai
Lampiran 1 4. Lanjutan...
Sub Sistem Valuasi Ekonomi Inv Kep Bak = 40 11 1 7.1 3/ 1 0 {Rp/Ha/Tahun) l n v P ~ e r k g= 4 1 367.16/10 (Rp/Ha/Tahun) ~ n v I ~ e m -= ~ i24798.9215 t (Rp/Ha/Tahun} Inv-Ra-Obat = 1250000/10 (RplHdTahun ) Inv-Tang-Ikan = 978652.86/5 ( Rp/Ha/Tahun) Inv Tebang = 539 16.39/ 10 { Rp/Ha/Tahun) 1 n v : ~ e r ~ ~ a= n5000000/ ~ 10 (Rp/Ha/Tahun ) Inv-Udang = 4 18222.43/10 ( RpkIdTahun Mang_Terkonversi = Luas-Tarn bak Man_Babi = 17553.30 {RplHalTahun) Man Belibis = 487591-71 (Rp/Ha/Tahun) ~an~lk= a n15095838.73 (Rp/Ha/Tahm) Man-Ke1= 48759.17 { RpMflahun) Man-Kep-Bakau = 69677 3 5.82 (Rp/HatTahun) M-erang = 1 626. I 8 (Rp/Ha/Tahun) M-bat = 3 1 93750 { R p E I f l a h u n ) Man-Pilihan = Niiai Fisik+Nilai-Kebe-tNilai-Kehatj Man_Reptil= 50634.53 ( RplHflahun) Man-Tak-Lang =
Man_Babi+Man-Belibis-tMm-Ikan+Man_Kel+ManKep-Bakau-tMan-Kerang+Ma n - ~ e ~ t i l + ~ r n - ~ e r - ~ a n ~ + ~ a n - ~ indud~~ut+~d-~ Ma-Teg-Pohon = 240796 1.83 { RpMaITahun) Man-Ter-Mang = 3000000 (Rp/HaTI'ahun) Man-Ud-Put = 294 1 15.33 {Rp/Ha/Tahun) Man-Lang = Man_Obat+Man_Teg-Pohon
Modal-Kerja
=
MokerBelibis+Moker-~ep+Bak-tMoker-Kerang+Moker-Mmdia+Moker-Pem-Bi t+Moker-Ra-Bat+MokerReptil+Moker-Tang-Ikan+Moker_Tebang+Moker_TerM ang+Moker-Udang Moker-Belibis = 48759.17 {Rp/Ha/Tahun) MokerKep-Bak = 79499 1.08 { RplHaITahun) MokerKerang = 975 1.83 {Rp/HdTahun) Moker-Mamalia = 5 8 5 1 .10 (RplHalTahun) MokerPem-Bit = 1 001 795.33 (Rp/Ha/Tahun) Moker-Ra-Bat = 273750 {Rp/Ha/Tahun) MokerReptil = 675 1 -27 (RplHalTahun ) Moker-Tang-kan = 2995 032.19 (RpMa/Tahun) Moker-Tebang = 9521 7.02 (RplEfalTahun) Moker-TerMang = 300000 (Rp/HalTahun) Moker-Udang = 12 1 3 225.74 (RpMa/Tahun) Net-PV-Mang = NPV(Tota1-Manfaat-Total_Biaya,0.15,20) Nilai Fisik = 18 15650 (Rp/Ha/Tahun) ~ilaiI~e= b e6291 000 (Rp/Ha/Tahun) Nilai Kehati = 375000 (Rp/Ha/'Tahun) ~ i l a i ~ ~ o t a l - ~= i lMangTerkonveni*TEV-Mangger-Thn an~ TEV/iangger20+Thn = Net-PV-Mang TEV-Mangqer-Thn = TEV-Mangqer-20-Thd20 TotalBiaya = Modal-Kerja+Total-Investasi T~tal~hvestasi = Inv-Kep-Bak+Inv-Kerang+Inv-Pem-Bit+ Inv-Ra-Obat-t Inv-Tang-Jkan+Inv-Teban g+Inv-Ter-Mang+Inv-Udang Total-Madaat = Man-Pilihan+Man-I'akLang-t Man-Lang Ud-Windu = 3749970.46 (RpMdTahun)
Usaha Tarnbak Biaya-Eks-Tam = Persentase*Investasi-Tam (Rpltahun) HargajerKg = 50000 ( Rp/Kg Investasi-Tam = 24000000 (Rpltahun) In-Biaya-Tarn = lnvestasi Tam+MokerTam+Biaya-Eks-Tarn In-Manfaat-Tam = ~ e n e r i m a a n ~ e ~ h a Moker-Tam = 103600000 {RptTahunJ Net PV Tam-Per 10 thn = NPV(In Manfaat-Tam-In-Biaya-Tam,O. 15,101 ~ e t - P ~ I ~ a m - ~ e r =- ~Nh~n ~ - P v - T ~10-thd - P ~I 0~ ~ m & r n a a n ~ e r - h a= Harga-perKg*Target -Prod--per-ha { Rp/ha) Persentase = 0.15 Target Prodqer ha = TargetProd-Maks/Luas-Tarn bak ~otal-~encfit = G a s - ~ a mb a k * ~ e t - ~ ~ - ~ a m - ~ e r* 2 -~hn A
-
256
Lampiran 15. Dosis pakan pada tarnbak intensif, semi intensif, dan tradisonal plus
Lampiran 15. Lanjutan.. .
Sumber : Data empirik
I 11 I
V
(NET PRESENT VALUE (hl'!')
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
1PA YBACK PERIOD
805,911.%8
0.70
