111
DAFTAR PUSTAKA A.
Buku;
Barutu,Christhophorus. Ketentuan Antidumping, Subsidi, dan Tindakan Pengamanan (Safeguard) Dalam GATT dan WTO, (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007 Batubara, Suleman dan Purba, Orinton. Arbitrase Internasional Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi Asing Melalui ICSID, UNCITRAL, dan SIAC, (Jakarta: Raih Asa Perkasa, 2013) Carter, Barry E dan Trimble, Philip R. International Law, (London: Little, Brown and Company, 1991) Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, “Suatu Kajian Umum Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional Termasuk di Dalam Tubuh ASEAN”, Perspektif, (Volume XVII No. 3 Tahun 2012 Edisi September) Dolzer, Rudolf dan Schreuer, Christoph. Principles of International Investment Law, (Newyork: Oxford University Press, 2008) Douglas, Zachary. The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails, 2 J. INT’L DISP. SETTLEMENT 97, 114 (2011) Gautama, Sudargo. Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia, Cet.Ke-3, (Bandung: Ersco,1986). HS, Salim dan Sutrisno, Budi, Hukum Investasi di Indonesia (Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012) Huala Adolf, Hukum Perdagangan Internasional, (Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2011) Irawan, Candra. Aspek Hukum dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Di Indonesia¸(Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2010) Kartadjoemena, H.S. GATT dan WTO Sistem, Forum dan Lembaga Internasional di Bidang Perdagangan, (Jakarta: UI Press, 2002), hal 41 Margaret L. Moses, The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, (United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2008)
112
Merrills, J. International Dispute Settlement, 5th ed.,(United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2011) Redfern, Alan and Hunter with Nigel Blackaby and Constante Partasides, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004) Rokhmatussa’dyah, Ana dan Suratman, Hukum investasi dan Pasar Modal, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,2010. Schill, Stephan W. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Schreuer, Christoph. Consent to Arbitration in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW 830 (Peter Muchlinski et al. eds., Oxford Univ. Press 2008). Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamudji,Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: CV. Rajawali, 1986) Sornarajah, M. The International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Sunggono,Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Suatu Pengantar, (Jakarta: Penerbit PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2003) Suwardi, Sri Setianingsih. Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional, (Jakarta: UI Press, 2006). Thomas,Barcay. Effects of ”Most-Favoured-Nation” Clause in Commercial Treaties, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 17 (1907) United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “Consent to Arbitration”,UNCTAD Dispute Settlement, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (United Nations: New York & Geneva, 2003)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Investor-State Dispute Settlement, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II( New York and Geneva, 2014) United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II. United Nations: New York / Geneva, 2010.
113
Widjaya, Gunawan 2000)
dan Yani, Ahmad. Hukum Arbitrase, (Jakarta: Rajawali Press,
Winarta, Frans Hendra. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013)
B.
Artikel, Jurnal, Makalah;
Jan Peter Sasse, An Economic Analysis of Bilateral Investment Treaties, Jeswald W. Salacuse & Nicholas P. Sullivan, “Do BITs Really Work?: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain”, 46 hArv. Int’l l.J. 67, 111–12 N Horn (ed), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes: Procedural and Substantive Legal Aspects (Kluwer 2004) Nenda Inasa Fadillah, Teinver V. Argentina: The Most Favored Nations Principle in a Multiple Bilateral Investment Treaties Era, (Jurnal Opinio Juris, 2013) Parker, Stephanie, “ A BIT at a Time: The Proper Extension of the MFN Clause to Dispute Settlement Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties”. 2012. Tony Cole, The Boundaries of Most Favoured Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, (Michigan Journal of International Law volume 33, 2012 ) hal. 553-554 C.
Instrumen Hukum Internasional;
Agreement Between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and The Government of [Country] for the Promotion and Protection of Investments 2006. Argentine-Spain BIT China-Germany BIT (2003) Convention on The Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (1965)
114
Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement, Energy Charter Treaty (1994) France–Malaysia BIT (1975) General Agreement on Tariffs for Trade 1947 (GATT) Germany-Jordan BIT (2007) International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses 1978, vol. II Netherland–Pakistan BIT tahun 1988 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Sweden–Yugoslavia BIT 1978 Swiss–Ghana BIT tahun 1991 Treaty of Amity and Commerce between France and United States of America 1778. United Kingdom–Spain BIT tahun 1980 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 D.
Dokumen PBB;
Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the work of its thirtieth Session” (UN Doc. A/33/10) in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1978 Report on the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause, 30 ILC Ybk., vol. II, Part One, p. 1, para. 328 (1978). Resolution 3281(XXIX) of the General Assembly of the United Nations of 12 December 1974, termed the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, Art. 2, para. 2(c). UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1996, Investment, Trade and International Policy E.
Instrumen Hukum Internasional;
115
Agreement Between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and The Government of [Country] for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, art. 3(3) (2005) (amended 2006) Argentine-Spain BIT China-Germany BIT (2003) Convention on The Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (1965) Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement, Energy Charter Treaty (1994) France–Malaysia BIT (1975) General Agreement on Tariffs for Trade 1947 (GATT) Germany-Jordan BIT (2007) International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses 1978, vol. II Netherland–PakistanBIT tahun (1988) North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Sweden–Yugoslavia BIT (1978) Swiss–Ghana BIT (1991) Treaty of Amity and Commerce between France and United States of America 1778. United Kingdom–Spain BIT tahun 1980 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 F. Instrumen Hukum Nasional; Undang-undang hukum penanaman modal asing Somalia tahun 1987, pasal 19; Undang-undang Investasi Zambia tahun 1991
116
Undang-undang Mesir No. 43 tahun 1975 mengenai Investasi Arab dan Modal Asing dan Zona Bebas Undang-Undang penanaman modal Asing Albania tahun 1993 G.
Putusan Pengadilan Internasional;
Ambatielos,. Greece v. United Kingdom. International Court of Justice. Judgment. 1952. Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. United Kingdom v. Iran. International Court of Justice. Judgment. 1952 Asian Agricultural Products Limited v. Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case NoARB/87/ 3, Award of June 27, 1990, ICSID Reports, Vol. 4 Case Concerning the Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco (ICJ reports 1952) Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1, Award, 22 August 2012, and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Charles N. Brower and Opinion of Professor Domingo Bello Janeiro. Emilio Agustín Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, Case No. ARB/97/7. International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction. 2000. Garanti Koza LLP v. Turkmenistan, ICSID case No. (ICSID Case No. ARB/11/20) Decision on The Objection to Jurisdiction for Lack of Consent, 13 Juli 2013 Gas Natural SDG, S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/10, Decision of the Tribunal on Preliminary Question of Jurisdiction, 17 June 2005 Impregilo S.p.A. v. Argentine Republic. Case No. Arb/07/17. International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Award .21 June 2011. Kılıç İnşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/1, 2 July 2013 Award and Separate Opinion of Professor William W. Park Plama Consortium Ltd. v. Bulgaria. Case No. ARB/03/24. International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Decision on Jurisdiction. 2005
117
Putusan Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (United Kingdom v. Iran), 22 Juli, 1952, I.C.J. Reports 1952 Putusan terhadap yuridiksi (decision on jurisdiction) Suez and InterAguas v. Argentina, 16 May 2006. RosInvest v. Russian Federation, SCC Case No. V079/2005 Award on Jurisdiction, Oct. 2007. Siemens AG v. The Argentine Republic. Case No. ARB/02/8. International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Decision on Jurisdiction. 2004. Suez Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19 (“Suez II”), Decision on Jurisdiction, Aug. 3, 2006. Teinver S.A., Transportes de Cercanías S.A. and Autobuses Urbanos del Sur S.A. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/1, Decision on Jurisdiction and Separate Opinion of Dr. Kamal Hossain, 21 December 2012 H.
Laporan Badan-Badan Internasional;
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment Number 2004/2: Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law. 2004. I.
Internet;
Christoph Schreuer, “Consent to Arbitration”, http://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/con_arbitr_89, diakses pada tanggal 28 April 2015, hal 1 Dolzer, R., and Myers, T., After Tecmeda: Most-Favored-Nation clause in Investment Protection Agreements, 19 ICSID Review FILJ 49 (2004), Acconci, P., The Most Favoured Nation Treatment and International Law on Foreign Investment, p. 1, available at http://www.ilahq.org/pdf/Foreign%20Investment/ACCONCI%20The%20Most%20Favoured% 20Nation.pdf (last visited on 25 April 2007). Eric De Brabandere, “Importing Consent to ICSID Arbitration?A critical Appraisal of Garanti Koza v. Turkmenistan. https://www.iisd.org/itn/2014/05/14/importing-
118
consent-to-icsid-arbitration-a-critical-appraisal-of-garanti-koza-v-turkmenistan/ diakses pada tanggal 2 Mei 2015 Gaillard, E., Establishing Jurisdiction Through a Most-Favored-Nation Clause, Vol. 233-No. 105, NYLJ (June 2, 2005) available at http://www.shearman.com/files/Publication/96d2288c-0c694fd6-b30607a676768572/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/4153cee7-3402-4cbf-863109c534add1da/IA_060205.pdf Diakses pada tanggal 21 Maret 2015 Interim Commission for The International Trade Organization, Final Act and Related Documents (United Nations Conference on Tra de and Employment held at Havana, Cuba, from November 21, 1947 to March 24, 1948), Art. 12 par. 2(a)(ii) http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/havana_e.pdf, diunduh 26 Maret 2015. UNCTAD, “What Are BITs”, http://www.unctadxi.org/templates/Page1006.aspx, (terakhir kali di akses 10 April 2015) Working Group The Relationship between Trade and Investment, “Concept Paper on Non-Discrimination”, World Trade Organization, WT/WGTI/W/122, Original: English, diakses dari http://trade-info.cec.eu.int/doclib/ docs/2003/april/tradoc_111121.pdf h. 1, diakses tanggal 8 Mei 2004. World Trade Organization, Understanding the WTO: Basics: Principle of the Trading System, http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact2_e.htm (terakhir kali dikunjungi 5 Maret 2015) Lembaga arbitrase Sebagai Pilihan http://www.greasy.com/dansur/lembaga_arbitrase_sebagai.html, maret 2015
Forum”, Diakses, 7
Pandangan Yuridis Conflict of Law dan Choice of Law Dalam Kontrak Bisinis Internasional”, http://www.bi.go.id/NR/rdonlyres/, Diakses, 7 Maret 2015.
