11. Oka Lely. Jika anak terlambat bicara Available from : 12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Judarwanto Widodo. Keterlambatan bicara-speech delay. 2008. Available from: http://www.keterlambatan-bicara.blogspot.com 2. Leung KA, Kao PC. Evaluation and management of the child with speech delay. Am Fam Phys 1999;59:32-45. 3. Klinik Tumbuh Kembang Anak RS. Dr. Kariadi. Studi pendahuluan disfasia perkembangan. Semarang; 2007. 4. Jonhston MV. Clinical disorder of brain plasticity. Brain dev 2004;26:73-80. 5. Mundkur N. Neuroplasticity in children. Indian J Pediatr 2005;72:855-7. 6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committe on children with disabilities. Role of the Pediatrician in family-centered early intervention service. Pediatrics 2001;107:1155-7. 7. Vincer MJ, Cake H, Graven M, Dodds L, McHugh S, Fraboni T. A population-based study to determine the performance of the cognitive adaptive test/clinical linguistic and auditory milestone scale to predict the mental developmental index at 18 months on the bayley scales of infant developmentII in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2005;116:864-7. 8. Accardo PJ, Capute AJ. The capute scales: Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic & Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS). Baltimore: Paul. H. Brookes Publishing Co; 2005. 9. Terapul Tarigan, Nancy Ervani, Syamsidah Lubis. Pola menonton televisi dan pengaruhnya terhadap anak. Sari Pediatri. 2007; 9(1):44-47. Available from: http://www.idai.or.id/saripediatri/pdfile/9-1-8.pdf 10. Strategi pencegahan perilaku negatif pada anak-anak sebagai akibat tayangan televisi dan model tayangan edukatif untuk anak-anak. Seminar Nasional Implementasi Sistem Manajemen Kualitas ISO 9001-2008 dan IWA 2 dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Dosen dan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur; 2009 Des 10; Surabaya: Ety D. Susanti, Yuli Candrasari, Yudiana Indriastuti; 2008

62

63

11. Oka

Lely.

Jika

anak

terlambat

bicara.

2008.

Available

from

:

www.balipost.com 12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement. Media use in children younger than 2 years. J pediatrics 2011;128:5. 13. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Television and DVD/video viewing in children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(5):473– 479. 14. Victoria J. Rideout, Elizabeth A. Vandewater, Ellen A. Wartella. Zero to six: electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. 2003. 15. Linebarger DL, Walker D. Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and language outcomes. Am Behav Sci. 2005;48(5):624–645. 16. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Associations between media viewing and language development in children under age two years. J Pediatr. 2007;151(4):364 –368. 17. Weerasak

Chonchaiya,

Chandhita

Pruksananond.

Television

viewing

associates with delayed language development. Acta Paediatr. 2008; 97(7):977–982. 18. Anak Agung Ayu W. Antari, I Gusti Ayu T. Windiani, Djauhar Ismail. Television watching time and cognitive development in young children. Paediatrica Indonesiana. 2012; 52(1):32-37 19. Dworkin JP, Culatta RA . Oral structural and neuromuscular characteristics in children with normal and disordered articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearingm Disorders. 1985;50(2), 150-156. 20. Chaer A. Psiokolinguistik kajian teoritik. Jakarta: Rineka Abdi. 2003 21. Owens RE. Language Development an Introduction, 5th edition. New York: Allyn and Bacon. 2001. 22. Webster RI. The clinical spectrum of developmental language impairment in school aged children: language, cognitive and motor findings. Pediatrics 2006;118:1541-9.

64

23. Ansel BM, Landa RM, Stark-Selz RE. Development and disorders of speech and language. In: Oski FA, DeAngelis CD, editors. Principles and practice of pediatrics. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:686–700. 24. Simkin Z, Conti G. Evidence of reading difficulty in subgroups of children with specific language impairment. Child language teaching and therapy 2006;22:315-31. 25. Makum, AH. Gangguan perkembangan berbahasa. Buku ajar ilmu kesehatan anak. Jakarta: Balai penerbit FKUI. 1991; 56-69. 26. Virginia W, Meredith G. Gangguan bicara dan bahasa. Buku ajar penyakit teli nga, hidung, tenggorok. Jakarta : EGC. 1997 ; 397-410 27. Departemen Rehabilitasi Medik. Buku laporan pasien rawat jalan. Jakarta. 2006. 28. Wahjuni S. Pemeriksaan penyaring keterlambatan perkembangan bahasa pada anak batita dengan Early Language Milestone Scale di kelurahan Paseban Jakarta Pusat. Jakarta. 1998. 29. Smith C, Hill J. Language development and disorders of communication and oral motor function. Pediatric Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus. 1999.p. 57-79. 30. Silva PA, Williams SM, McGee R. A longitudinal study of children with developmental language delay at age three; later intelligence , reading and behavior problems. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29;630-640. 31. Schwartz ER. Speech and language disorders. In: Schwartz MW, editor. Pediatric primary care: a problem oriented approach. St. Louis: Mosby, 1990: 696–700. 32. Coplan J. Evaluation of the child with delayed speech or language. Pediatr Ann. 1985;14:203–8. 33. Leung AK, Robson WL, Fagan J, Chopra S, Lim SH. Mental retardation. J R Soc Health. 1995;115:31–9. 34. Leung AK, Robson WL. Otitis media in infants and children. Drug Protocol. 1990;5:29–35.

65

35. Schlieper A, Kisilevsky H, Mattingly S, Yorke L. Mild conductive hearing loss and language development: a one year follow-up study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1985;6:65–8. 36. Shonkoff JP. Language delay: late talking to communication disorder. In: Rudolph AM, Hoffman JI, Rudolph CD, editors. Rudolph's pediatrics. London: Prentice-Hall. 1996:124–8. 37. Bishop DV. Developmental disorders of speech and language. In: Rutter M, Taylor E, Hersov L, eds. Child and adolescent psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell Science. 1994:546–68. 38. Davis H, Stroud A, Green L. The maternal language environment of children with language delay. Br J Disord Commun. 1988;23:253–66. 39. American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on children with disabilities. identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006;118:405-19. 40. Dhamayanti Meita, Herlina Murfariza. Skrining gangguan kognitif dan bahasa dengan menggunakan capute scales (Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic

and

Auditory

Milestone

Scale-Cat/Clams).

Sari

Pediatri.

2009;11(3):189-98). 41. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja. 2005. 42. Kamila B. Mistry, Cynthia S. Minkovitz, Donna M. Strobino and Dina L.G. Children's television exposure and behavioral and social outcomes at 5.5 years: does timing of exposure matter? Pediatrics. Vol. 120(4), 2007:762-769 p. Available from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/ 43. Amy B. Jordan, James C. Hersey, Judith A. McDivitt, Carrie D. Heitzler. Reducing children’s television-viewing time: a qualitative study of parents and their children. Pediatrics. Vol. 118(5), 2006:e1303-e1310 p. Available from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/ 44. Rideout VJ, Hamel E. The media family: electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers, preschoolers, and their parents. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2006.

66

45. Committee on Public Education. Media education, J. Pediatrics 1999;104:3423. 46. Roberts DF, Foehr UG. Kids and Media in America. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2004. 47. Vandewater EA, Park SE, Huang X, Wartella EA. No: you can’t watch thatparental rules and young children’s media use.

Am Behav Sci.

2005;48(5):608-623. 48. Anderson DR, Evans MK. Peril and potential of media for infants and toddlers. Zero to Three. 2001;22(2):10-16. 49. Kirkorian HL, Pempek TA, Murphy LA, Schmidt ME, Anderson DR. The impact of background television on parent-child interaction. Child Dev. 2009;80(5):1350-1359. 50. Hart B, Risley TR. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1995. 51. Masako T, Okuma K, Kyoshima K. Television viewing and reduced parental utterance, and delayed speech development in infants and young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(6):618-619. 52. Schmidt ME, Pempek TA, Kirkorian HL, Lund AF, Anderson DR. The effects of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children. Child Dev. 2008;79(4):1137-1151. 53. Dimitri A. Christakis. The effects of infant media usage: what do we know and what should we learn? Acta Paediatrica 2009;98: 8-16. 54. Hooper ML, Chang P. Comparison of demands of sustained attentional events between public and private children’s television programming. Percept Mot Skills. 1998; 86:431–434. 55. Amy Nathanson. Parental mediation of media effects. In Schement, Jorge Reina, et al, editors. Encyclopedia of communication and information. New York: Macmillan reference USA; 2002. p. 154-175 56. M. Sopiyudin Dahlan. Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan. Edisi ke-5. Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2011.

67

Lampiran 1. Ethical clearance

68

Lampiran 2. Surat permohonan ethical clearance

69

Lampiran 3. Surat rujukan

70

71

Lampiran 4. Informed Consent

LEMBAR INFORMASI CALON SUBJEK JUDUL PENELITIAN

:

PENELITI

:

Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang Ani Safitri

Bapak/Ibu Yth, Saya mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro yang melakukan penelitian dengan judul “Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang”. Penelitian ini telah memiliki izin tertulis dari pihak-pihak yang berwenang. Dalam penelitian ini, saya ingin mencari informasi mengenai pola menonton televisi dan keterlambatan bicara pada anak usia 1-3 tahun. Saya akan menjelaskan tujuan, tata cara penelitian, dan menanyakan kesediaan untuk berpartisipasi kepada orang tua responden sebagai wakil dari responden. Jika orang tua responden bersedia, orang tua responden akan menjalani wawancara dan responden akan menjalani pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara. Tidak terdapat risiko negatif pada penelitian ini. Orang tua responden hanya diminta meluangkan waktu untuk melakukan wawancara dan memberi izin saya untuk melakukan pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara pada responden. Dengan berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini, orang tua responden dapat mengetahui lebih dini apakah responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara sehingga dapat ditindaklanjuti dengan cepat dan tepat. Seluruh informasi yang didapatkan selama penelitan termasuk data pribadi dan data penelitian akan dijaga kerahasiaannya. Nama responden atau dokumen lain yang mengidentifikasikan responden sebagai subjek penelitian tidak akan dibuka tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari orang tua responden. Apabila ditengah perjalanan orang tua responden mengundurkan diri dari penelitian, saya sangat menghargai keputusan tersebut dan tidak akan mengenakan sanksi apapun. Jika responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara, akan dirujuk ke Klinik Tumbuh Kembang Anak RSUP Dr. Kariadi dengan dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) sebagai penanggung jawab. Jika Bapak/Ibu mempunyai pertanyaan mengenai penelitian ini, dapat menghubungi: Ani Safitri (085641196888) dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) (pembimbing) dr. Gana Adyaksa, MSi.Med ( pembimbing) FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS DIPENOGORO SEMARANG Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH. Tembalang ,Semarang, Kotak Pos 1269 No Telpon : 024-76928011 Faksimile : 024-76928011 Email : [email protected]

72

LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN SUBJEK PENELITIAN (Informed Consent) Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini: Nama : Alamat : Telp : Orangtua kandung/wali dari: Nama : TPA / PAUD : Menerangkan bahwa setelah menerima sepenuhnya penjelasan tentang penelitian “Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang” saya, mewakili responden, menyatakan SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU untuk ikut dalam penelitian ini. Demikian surat persetujuan ini kami buat dengan sesungguhnya dan penuh kesadaran untuk dapat dipergunakan sebagaimana mestinya.

Peneliti

Semarang, ........................ 2013 Orang tua/wali yang menyetujui

(Ani Safitri)

(………........................................)

Mengetahui saksi-saksi

1. _______________________

2. _______________________

73

Lampiran 5. Spreadsheet data penelitian No Nama Usia Sex (bulan)

1

NA

25

Lakilaki

2

FF

19

Perem puan

3

FT

30

Perem puan

4

AF

33

Lakilaki

5

AK

23

Lakilaki

6

LS

32

Perem puan

7

SA

30

Perem puan

8

DA

32

Lakilaki

9

MA

29

Perem puan

10

ZP

29

11

SH

34

Lakilaki Lakilaki

Pendidikan Pendidikan pekerjaan pekerjaa Status Pengasuh Pendidikan Jumlah TV di Durasi Onset Program Pendampingan Intepretasi Ayah Ibu ayah n ibu ekonomi pengasuh TV kamar menonton menonton TV Capute TV TV hiburan Suspek Perguruan Perguruan Orang Tidak >2 jam per dan Keterlambatan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Bicara <1 jam dan hiburan Tidak 1-2 jam per dan Tidak SMA SMA Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara SMA 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Perguruan Orang 1-2 jam per dan Tinggi SMA Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan Tidak Tidak 1-2 jam per Tidak SMA SMA Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara SD 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi Didampingi Normal hiburan Suspek Perguruan Perguruan > >2 jam per dan Keterlambatan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SMP 1buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Bicara <1 jam dan hiburan Perguruan Perguruan Orang 1-2 jam per dan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari >24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Tidak Orang Tidak 1-2 jam per dan SMA SMA Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Perguruan Perguruan Orang 1-2 jam per dan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Lain SD 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Perguruan Perguruan Tidak Orang > 1-2 jam per dan Tidak Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Lain SMA 1buah Ada hari >24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Perguruan Perguruan Orang Tidak 1-2 jam per dan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari >24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal Perguruan Perguruan Tidak <1 jam dan hiburan Suspek Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SD 1 buah Ada 1-2 jam per 0-24 Bulan dan Didampingi Keterlambatan

74

hari Perem Perguruan Perguruan puan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja

12 CQ

34

13 AD

34

14

NI

19

Perem Perguruan Perguruan puan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja

15

FA

25


16

KB

34

17 MQ

23

18 MN

34

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja

19 HA

31

Lakilaki


20

TA

23

Lakilaki


21

BB

23

22 MA

33

23

27

AC

Lakilaki

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja



Perem Perguruan puan Tinggi Lakilaki

SMA

SMA

Bekerja

SMA

Bekerja


Tinggi

Orang Lain

SMA

Orang Lain

SMA

keduanya

Tidak >2 jam per 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi

Bicara Suspek Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara Suspek Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara

Tidak >2 jam per Ada hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi hiburan Orang Perguruan > Tidak >2 jam per dan Bekerja Menengah Lain Tinggi 1buah Ada hari >24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Orang Tidak 1-2 jam per dan Bekerja Tinggi Lain SD 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal hiburan Suspek Orang Perguruan > Tidak >2 jam per dan Tidak Keterlambatan Bekerja Tinggi Lain Tinggi 1buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Bicara Suspek Orang Tidak >2 jam per Tidak Keterlambatan Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi Didampingi Bicara <1 jam dan hiburan Orang > Tidak 1-2 jam per dan Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Orang Tidak 1-2 jam per dan Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari >24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan > Tidak 1-2 jam per dan Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SMA 1buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Orang > 1-2 jam per dan Bekerja Tinggi Lain SMA 1buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan Orang Tidak 1-2 jam per dan Bekerja Menengah Lain SMA 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal <1 jam dan hiburan 1-2 jam per dan Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SD 1 buah Ada hari >24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi Normal Tinggi

1 buah

75

AA

25

Perem Perguruan puan Tinggi

25 KM

34


Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang Lain

SMA

1 buah

Tidak Ada

26

21

Perem Perguruan Perguruan puan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang Lain

SD

> 1buah

Ada

Ada

24

ER

Orang Lain

SMA

SMA

> 1buah

Ada

Perguruan Tinggi

SMA

Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang Lain

Perguruan Tinggi 1 buah

27


SMA

Bekerja Bekerja

Orang Lain

Perguruan Tidak Tinggi 1 buah Ada

29 AKA

24

Perem Perguruan Perguruan puan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

30 MKM

36

31 AMI

30

32 KTA

32

Lakilaki

33 CRY

31

Lakilaki

34 KZP

25

35 ASD

32

36 KAT

23

27 MAH

31

28 ARJ

Lakilaki

SMA

Tidak Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Lakilaki

Tinggi

Orang Lain

1 buah

Tidak Ada

Perguruan Tinggi 1 buah

Ada

SMA

>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari >24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari >24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari >24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan

hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya


Tinggi

Saudara


Tinggi

Orang Lain

Perguruan Tidak Tinggi 1 buah Ada


Tinggi

Orang Lain

Perguruan Tidak >2 jam per Tinggi 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan


Tinggi

Saudara

SMP


Tinggi

Orang Lain

SMA

Tidak >2 jam per Ada hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan Tidak 1-2 jam per 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan


Tinggi

Orang Lain

SMA

1 buah

Perem Perguruan Perguruan Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang

SMA

1 buah Tidak <1 jam dan 0-24 Bulan hiburan

Lakilaki

1 buah

Tidak >2 jam per Ada hari 0-24 Bulan

Suspek Tidak Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal Suspek Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara Suspek Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara

Didampingi

Normal Suspek Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara Didampingi

Normal

76

puan

Tinggi

Tinggi

Lain

Ada

37 KSP

21


SD

> 1buah

Ada

38 MPA

35


Orang Lain

SMP

> 1buah

Ada

39 MPRN

15

Lakilaki


Orang Lain

SMP

> 1buah

Ada

40 FJV

27

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang Lain

SMA

> 1buah

Ada

41 ART

19

Perem Perguruan Perguruan puan Tinggi Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara

42 ARL

32

Perem puan

SMA

Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang Lain

SMA

43 BGA

29

Lakilaki

SMA

Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang Lain

SMA

Tinggi

Saudara

Tinggi

Tinggi

SD

1-2 jam per hari >2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan

>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan <1 jam dan Tidak 1-2 jam per 1 buah Ada hari >24 Bulan <1 jam dan Tidak 1-2 jam per 1 buah Ada hari >24 Bulan <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per 1 buah Ada hari 0-24 Bulan

dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya hiburan dan keduanya

Suspek Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal Suspek Keterlambatan Didampingi Bicara

Edukasi Didampingi hiburan dan keduanya Didampingi hiburan dan keduanya Didampingi

Normal

Normal

Normal

77

Lampiran 6. Hasil analisis penelitian Durasi Menonton Televisi Descriptives Durasi Menonton Televisi Usia dalam Bulan <1 Jam

Mean

27.00

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound for Mean Upper Bound

23.20

5% Trimmed Mean

27.11

Median

28.50

Variance

28.222

Std. Deviation

1-2 Jam

1.680

30.80

5.312

Minimum

19

Maximum

33

Range

14

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.506

.687

Kurtosis

-1.195

1.334

Mean

28.75

1.222


26.19

5% Trimmed Mean

29.11

Median

29.50

Variance

29.882

Std. Deviation

31.31

5.466

Minimum

15

Maximum

36

Range

21

Interquartile Range

>2 Jam

Statistic Std. Error

9

Skewness

-.872

.512

Kurtosis

.440

.992

Mean

27.69

1.491


24.44

5% Trimmed Mean

27.82

Median

27.00

Variance

28.897

Std. Deviation Minimum

30.94

5.376 19

78

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.161

.616

Kurtosis

-1.558

1.191

Tests of Normality Durasi Kolmogorov-Smirnova Menonton Televisi Statistic df Sig.

Shapiro-Wilk Statistic

Sig.

.896

10

.198

Usia dalam Bulan <1 Jam

.214

10

1-2 Jam

.168

20

.140

.931

20

.161

13

*

.898

13

.124

>2 Jam .192 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

.200

df

*

.200

Oneway Test of Homogeneity of Variances Usia dalam Bulan Levene Statistic

df1

.095

df2 2

Sig. 40

.910

ANOVA Usia dalam Bulan Sum of Squares Between Groups Within Groups Total

df

22.458 1168.519 1190.977

Mean Square 2 40 42

11.229 29.213

F

Sig. .384

.683

Onset Menonton Televisi Descriptives Onset Menonton Televisi Usia dalam Bulan 0-24 Bulan Mean

Statistic Std. Error 27.97


25.98

5% Trimmed Mean

28.18

Median

29.50

Variance

30.289

Std. Deviation

29.95

5.504

Minimum

15

Maximum

36

Range

21

.973

79

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.391

.414

Kurtosis

-.817

.809

28.18

1.512

>24 Bulan Mean 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound for Mean Upper Bound

24.81

5% Trimmed Mean

28.37

Median

29.00

Variance

25.164

31.55

Std. Deviation

5.016

Minimum

19

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

5

Skewness Kurtosis

-1.159

.661

.442

1.279

Tests of Normality Onset Menonton Televisi

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Statistic

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

Usia dalam Bulan 0-24 Bulan

.144

32

.090

.931

32

.041

>24 Bulan a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

.225

11

.125

.842

11

.033

Descriptives Onset Menonton Televisi trans_usia

0-24 Bulan

Statistic

Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean

1.4377 Lower Bound

1.4045

Upper Bound

1.4709

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4438

Median

1.4698

Variance Std. Deviation

Std. Error .01629

.008 .09213

Minimum

1.18

Maximum

1.56

Range

.38

Interquartile Range

.16

Skewness

-.806

.414

Kurtosis

.350

.809

80

>24 Bulan

Mean

1.4427

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound

1.3844

Upper Bound

1.5009

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4469

Median

1.4624

Variance

.02615

.008

Std. Deviation

.08672

Minimum

1.28

Maximum

1.53

Range

.25

Interquartile Range

.07

Skewness

-1.383

.661

.853

1.279

Kurtosis Tests of Normality Onset Menonton Televisi trans_usia


0-24 Bulan

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

.166

32

.026

.910

32

.011

>24 Bulan .266 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

11

.028

.791

11

.007

Mann-Whitney Test Test Statisticsb Usia dalam Bulan Mann-Whitney U 172.500 Wilcoxon W 238.500 Z -.098 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .922 Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .924a a. Not corrected for ties. b. Grouping Variable: Onset Menonton Televisi Program Televisi yang ditonton Descriptives Program Televisi yang ditonton Usia dalam Bulan Edukasi


Mean

28.60


19.79

5% Trimmed Mean

28.83

Median

33.00

37.41

3.172

81


Hiburan

50.300 7.092

Minimum

19

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

13

Skewness

-.771

.913

Kurtosis

-2.293

2.000

Mean

27.64

1.146


25.25

5% Trimmed Mean

27.91

Median

29.50

Variance

28.909

Std. Deviation

30.02

5.377

Minimum

15

Maximum

35

Range

20

Interquartile Range

8

Skewness

-.736

.491

Kurtosis

-.230

.953

28.38

1.251

Keduanya Mean 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound for Mean Upper Bound

25.71

5% Trimmed Mean

28.47

Median

29.00

Variance

25.050

Std. Deviation

31.04

5.005

Minimum

19

Maximum

36

Range

17

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.195

.564

Kurtosis

-.993

1.091

82

Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnova

Program Televisi yang ditonton

Statistic

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

Usia dalam Bulan Edukasi

.333

5

.074

.792

5

.070

Hiburan

.170

22

.098

.932

22

.133

16

*

.952

16

.523

Keduanya .125 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

.200

Oneway Test of Homogeneity of Variances Usia dalam Bulan Levene Statistic

df1

1.002

df2 2

Sig. 40

.376

ANOVA Usia dalam Bulan Sum of Squares Between Groups Within Groups Total

df

6.936 1184.041 1190.977

Mean Square 2 40 42

3.468 29.601

F

Sig. .117

.890

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Descriptives Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Usia dalam Bulan

Tidak Didampingi


Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean

27.17 Lower Bound

21.00

Upper Bound

33.34

5% Trimmed Mean

27.24

Median

27.00

Variance

34.567

Std. Deviation

Didampingi

2.400

5.879

Minimum

19

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

11

Skewness

-.153

.845

Kurtosis

-1.492

1.741

28.16

.872

Mean 95% Confidence

Lower Bound

26.39

83

Interval for Mean

Upper Bound

29.93

5% Trimmed Mean

28.38

Median

30.00

Variance

28.140

Std. Deviation

5.305

Minimum

15

Maximum

36

Range

21

Interquartile Range

9

Skewness

-.589

.388

Kurtosis

-.513

.759

Tests of Normality Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Usia dalam Bulan


Tidak Didampingi

.173

Didampingi .149 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig. 6 37

Statistic

df

Sig.

*

.949

6

.729

.037

.939

37

.043

.200

Descriptives Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh trans_usia

Tidak Didampingi

Mean

1.4251


1.3227

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4274

Median

1.4302


Didampingi

Statistic Std. Error .03983

1.5275

.010 .09758

Minimum

1.28

Maximum

1.53

Range

.25

Interquartile Range

.18

Skewness

-.434

.845

Kurtosis

-.986

1.741

Mean

1.4412

.01474


1.4113 1.4711

84

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4473

Median

1.4771

Variance

.008

Std. Deviation

.08969

Minimum

1.18

Maximum

1.56

Range

.38

Interquartile Range

.13

Skewness

-.996

.388

Kurtosis

.630

.759

Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnova

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh trans_usia

Statistic

Tidak Didampingi

df

.164

Didampingi .169 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig. 6 37

Statistic

df

Sig.

*

.946

6

.707

.009

.906

37

.004

.200

Mann-Whitney Test Test Statisticsb Usia dalam Bulan Mann-Whitney U 99.500 Wilcoxon W 120.500 Z -.405 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .686 Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .694a a. Not corrected for ties. b. Grouping Variable: Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Jenis Kelamin * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki

Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total

Perempuan

Count

1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

4

8

8

20

4.7

9.3

6.0

20.0

40.0%

40.0%

61.5%

46.5%

9.3%

18.6%

18.6%

46.5%

6

12

5

23

85

Expected Count

Total

5.3

10.7

7.0

23.0

% within Durasi Menonton Televisi

60.0%

60.0%

38.5%

53.5%

% of Total

14.0%

27.9%

11.6%

53.5%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total Chi-Square Tests Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.691a 2 .429 Likelihood Ratio 1.697 2 .428 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.169 1 .280 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.65. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Durasi Menonton Televisi Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.183

Positive

.183

Negative

.000 .597 .868

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin Jenis Kelamin * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan Jenis Kelamin

Laki-laki

Count

Total

17

3

20

14.9

5.1

20.0

% within Onset Menonton Televisi

53.1%

27.3%

46.5%

% of Total

39.5%

7.0%

46.5%

15

8

23

17.1

5.9

23.0

Expected Count

Perempuan

>24 Bulan

Count Expected Count

86

Total


46.9%

72.7%

53.5%

% of Total

34.9%

18.6%

53.5%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Count Expected Count % within Onset Menonton Televisi % of Total Chi-Square Tests Value

Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctionb Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

df

2.199a 1.283 2.274

1 1 1

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.138 .257 .132 .175

2.148

1

.128

.143

43

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.12. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Jenis Kelamin * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki

Count Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total

Perempuan Count Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Total


Hiburan Keduanya

Total

2

9

9

20

2.3

10.2

7.4

20.0

40.0%

40.9%

56.3%

46.5%

4.7%

20.9%

20.9%

46.5%

3

13

7

23

2.7

11.8

8.6

23.0

60.0%

59.1%

43.8%

53.5%

7.0%

30.2%

16.3%

53.5%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

87

Chi-Square Tests Value

Df


Pearson Chi-Square .973a 2 .615 Likelihood Ratio .974 2 .615 Linear-by-Linear Association .766 1 .381 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.33. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.146

Positive

.146

Negative

.000 .476 .977

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin Jenis Kelamin * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki

Count Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total

Perempuan


Total


Didampingi

Total

2

18

20

2.8

17.2

20.0

33.3%

48.6%

46.5%

4.7%

41.9%

46.5%

4

19

23

3.2

19.8

23.0

66.7%

51.4%

53.5%

9.3%

44.2%

53.5%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

88


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .487a 1 .485 b Continuity Correction .066 1 .798 Likelihood Ratio .497 1 .481 Fisher's Exact Test .669 Linear-by-Linear .475 1 .490 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.403

Status Gizi * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total Total


1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Status Gizi * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan Status Gizi

Gizi Baik

Count Expected Count % within Onset Menonton Televisi % of Total

Total


Status Gizi * Program Televisi yang ditonton

>24 Bulan

Total

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

89

Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count

% of Total Total

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

Expected Count

% of Total

Total

22

Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton

Keduanya

5

Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton

Hiburan

Status Gizi * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Status Gizi

Gizi Baik Count Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total

Total


Didampingi

Total

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam Pendidikan Terakhir SMA Ayah


Perguruan Tinggi


Total

4

2

0

6

1.4

2.8

1.8

6.0

40.0%

10.0%

.0%

14.0%

9.3%

4.7%

.0%

14.0%

6

18

13

37

8.6

17.2

11.2

37.0

90

Total


60.0%

90.0% 100.0%

86.0%

% of Total

14.0%

41.9%

30.2%

86.0%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0


100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah

SMA

Count

5

1

6

4.5

1.5

6.0


15.6%

9.1%

14.0%

% of Total

11.6%

2.3%

14.0%

27

10

37

27.5

9.5

37.0


84.4%

90.9%

86.0%

% of Total

62.8%

23.3%

86.0%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

Expected Count

Perguruan Tinggi

Total

Total


Count Expected Count % within Onset Menonton Televisi

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

74.4%

25.6% 100.0%

% of Total Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab

Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total Pendidikan Terakhir SMA Ayah

Count

1

4

1

6

Expected Count

.7

3.1

2.2

6.0

20.0%

18.2%

6.3%

14.0%

2.3%

9.3%

2.3%

14.0%

4

18

15

37

4.3

18.9

13.8

37.0

% within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Perguruan Tinggi


91

% within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Total


80.0%

81.8%

93.8%

86.0%

9.3%

41.9%

34.9%

86.0%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0%

37.2% 100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Didampingi Pendidikan Terakhir SMA Ayah

Count

2

4

6

Expected Count

.8

5.2

6.0

33.3%

10.8%

14.0%

4.7%

9.3%

14.0%

4

33

37

5.2

31.8

37.0

66.7%

89.2%

86.0%

9.3%

76.7%

86.0%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

% within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total Perguruan Tinggi


Total

Total


100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam Pendidikan Terakhir SMA Ibu

Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi

Total

6

3

1

10

2.3

4.7

3.0

10.0

60.0%

15.0%

7.7%

23.3%

92

% of Total Perguruan Tinggi


Total


14.0%

7.0%

2.3%

23.3%

4

17

12

33

7.7

15.3

10.0

33.0

40.0%

85.0%

92.3%

76.7%

9.3%

39.5%

27.9%

76.7%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%


df



Absolute

.479

Positive

.000

Negative

-.479 1.326 .059

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu

SMA

Count

Total

7

3

10

7.4

2.6

10.0


21.9%

27.3%

23.3%

% of Total

16.3%

7.0%

23.3%

Expected Count

93

Perguruan Tinggi

Total

Count

25

8

33

24.6

8.4

33.0


78.1%

72.7%

76.7%

% of Total

58.1%

18.6%

76.7%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .134a 1 .715 b Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .130 1 .718 Fisher's Exact Test .698 Linear-by-Linear .131 1 .718 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.504

Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Pendidikan Terakhir SMA Ibu


Perguruan Tinggi


Total


Total

1

7

2

10

1.2

5.1

3.7

10.0

20.0%

31.8%

12.5%

23.3%

2.3%

16.3%

4.7%

23.3%

4

15

14

33

3.8

16.9

12.3

33.0

80.0%

68.2%

87.5%

76.7%

9.3%

34.9%

32.6%

76.7%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

94

% within Program Televisi yang ditonton

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total

11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0%

37.2% 100.0%


df


Pearson Chi-Square 1.971a 2 .373 Likelihood Ratio 2.060 2 .357 Linear-by-Linear Association .731 1 .393 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.16. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.224

Positive

.021

Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu

-.224 .621 .835

Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Didampingi Pendidikan Terakhir SMA Ibu


Perguruan Tinggi


Total

3

7

10

1.4

8.6

10.0

50.0%

18.9%

23.3%

7.0%

16.3%

23.3%

3

30

33

4.6

28.4

33.0

50.0%

81.1%

76.7%

7.0%

69.8%

76.7%

95

Total


6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.794a 1 .095 b Continuity Correction 1.324 1 .250 Likelihood Ratio 2.431 1 .119 Fisher's Exact Test .127 Linear-by-Linear 2.729 1 .099 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.127

Pekerjaan Ayah * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja


Total


1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Pekerjaan Ayah * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan Pekerjaan Ayah

Bekerja


>24 Bulan

Total

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

96

% of Total Total

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%


Pekerjaan Ayah * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja Count

% of Total Total

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

Expected Count

% of Total

Total

22

Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton

Keduanya

5


Hiburan

Pekerjaan Ayah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja

Count

% of Total Total

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%


Total

6

Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh

Didampingi

Pekerjaan Ibu * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam

1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

97

Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count

2

1

1

4

.9

1.9

1.2

4.0

20.0%

5.0%

7.7%

9.3%

4.7%

2.3%

2.3%

9.3%

8

19

12

39

9.1

18.1

11.8

39.0


80.0%

95.0%

92.3%

90.7%

% of Total

18.6%

44.2%

27.9%

90.7%

Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total Bekerja


Total


10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%


df


Pearson Chi-Square 1.835a 2 .399 Likelihood Ratio 1.615 2 .446 Linear-by-Linear Association .831 1 .362 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .93. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Durasi Menonton Televisi Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.295

Positive

.000

Negative

-.295 .562 .911

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu Pekerjaan IBu * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan Pekerjaan IBu

Tidak Bekerja Count Expected Count

>24 Bulan

Total

3

1

4

3.0

1.0

4.0

98

Bekerja


9.4%

9.1%

9.3%

% of Total

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

29

10

39

29.0

10.0

39.0


90.6%

90.9%

90.7%

% of Total

67.4%

23.3%

90.7%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%


Total


Df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .001a 1 .978 b Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .001 1 .978 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 Linear-by-Linear .001 1 .978 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.02. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.733

Pekerjaan IBu * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Bekerja


Total


Hiburan Keduanya

Total

1

1

2

4

.5

2.0

1.5

4.0

20.0%

4.5%

12.5%

9.3%

2.3%

2.3%

4.7%

9.3%

4

21

14

39

4.5

20.0

14.5

39.0

80.0%

95.5%

87.5%

90.7%

9.3%

48.8%

32.6%

90.7%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

99


100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

% of Total Chi-Square Tests Value 1.462a 1.418 .000 43

Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases


df 2 2 1

.481 .492 .985

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .47. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.147

Positive

.141

Negative

-.147 .281 1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu Pekerjaan IBu * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total Bekerja


Total


Didampingi

Total

3

1

4

.6

3.4

4.0

50.0%

2.7%

9.3%

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

3

36

39

5.4

33.6

39.0

50.0%

97.3%

90.7%

7.0%

83.7%

90.7%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100

% within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

% of Total Chi-Square Tests Value

df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 13.689a 1 .000 b Continuity Correction 8.657 1 .003 Likelihood Ratio 9.103 1 .003 Fisher's Exact Test .006 Linear-by-Linear 13.371 1 .000 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .56. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.006

Status Ekonomi * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Status Ekonomi Menengah Count

3

12

2.8

5.6

3.6

12.0


50.0%

20.0%

23.1%

27.9%

% of Total

11.6%

9.3%

7.0%

27.9%

5

16

10

31

7.2

14.4

9.4

31.0


50.0%

80.0%

76.9%

72.1%

% of Total

11.6%

37.2%

23.3%

72.1%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Expected Count


Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association

Total

4

Count

Total

>2 Jam

5

Expected Count

Tinggi

1-2 Jam

3.198a 2.994 1.715


df 2 2 1

.202 .224 .190

101

N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Durasi Menonton Televisi Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.255

Positive

.000

Negative

-.255 .751 .625

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi Status Ekonomi * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan Status Ekonomi

Menengah

Count

5

12

8.9

3.1

12.0


21.9%

45.5%

27.9%

% of Total

16.3%

11.6%

27.9%

25

6

31

23.1

7.9

31.0


78.1%

54.5%

72.1%

% of Total

58.1%

14.0%

72.1%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%


Total

Total

7

Expected Count

Tinggi

>24 Bulan


Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctionb Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association


df

2.262a 1.242 2.139

1 1 1

.133 .265 .144

2.210

1

.137

Exact Sig. (2sided)

.241

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.133

102

N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Status Ekonomi * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Status Ekonomi Menengah Count Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Tinggi


Total


Hiburan Keduanya

2

8

2

12

1.4

6.1

4.5

12.0

40.0%

36.4%

12.5%

27.9%

4.7%

18.6%

4.7%

27.9%

3

14

14

31

3.6

15.9

11.5

31.0

60.0%

63.6%

87.5%

72.1%

7.0%

32.6%

32.6%

72.1%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%


df


Pearson Chi-Square 3.033a 2 .219 Likelihood Ratio 3.290 2 .193 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.516 1 .113 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Total

Absolute

.285

Positive

.000

Negative

-.285 .838 .484

103

Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.285

Positive

.000

Negative

-.285 .838 .484

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi Status Ekonomi * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Status Ekonomi Menengah Count

8

12

1.7

10.3

12.0

66.7%

21.6%

27.9%

9.3%

18.6%

27.9%

2

29

31

4.3

26.7

31.0

33.3%

78.4%

72.1%

4.7%

67.4%

72.1%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

% of Total Tinggi


Total


Total

4

Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh

Didampingi

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctionb Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

5.207a 3.209 4.646


df 1 1 1

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.022 .073 .031 .042

5.086

1

.024

43

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.

.042

104


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.207a 1 .022 b Continuity Correction 3.209 1 .073 Likelihood Ratio 4.646 1 .031 Fisher's Exact Test .042 Linear-by-Linear 5.086 1 .024 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.042

Pengasuh Anak * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Pengasuh Anak Saudara

Count

>2 Jam

Total

5

2

3

10

2.3

4.7

3.0

10.0


50.0%

10.0%

23.1%

23.3%

% of Total

11.6%

4.7%

7.0%

23.3%

5

18

10

33

7.7

15.3

10.0

33.0


50.0%

90.0%

76.9%

76.7%

% of Total

11.6%

41.9%

23.3%

76.7%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Expected Count

Orang Lain Count Expected Count

Total

1-2 Jam


df


Pearson Chi-Square 5.977a 2 .050 Likelihood Ratio 5.730 2 .057 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.748 1 .186 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.33. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

105

Test Statisticsa Durasi Menonton Televisi Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.348

Positive

.000

Negative

-.348 .965 .309

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak Pengasuh Anak * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan Pengasuh Anak

Saudara

Count

2

10

7.4

2.6

10.0


25.0%

18.2%

23.3%

% of Total

18.6%

4.7%

23.3%

24

9

33

24.6

8.4

33.0


75.0%

81.8%

76.7%

% of Total

55.8%

20.9%

76.7%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%


Total

Total

8

Expected Count

Orang Lain

>24 Bulan


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .213a 1 .644 b Continuity Correction .002 1 .962 Likelihood Ratio .221 1 .638 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 Linear-by-Linear .208 1 .648 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.496

106

Pengasuh Anak * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Pengasuh Anak Saudara

Count

4

4

10

1.2

5.1

3.7

10.0

40.0%

18.2%

25.0%

23.3%

4.7%

9.3%

9.3%

23.3%

3

18

12

33

3.8

16.9

12.3

33.0

60.0%

81.8%

75.0%

76.7%

7.0%

41.9%

27.9%

76.7%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

% of Total Orang Lain Count Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Total

Count Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Chi-Square Tests Value

df


Pearson Chi-Square 1.130a 2 .568 Likelihood Ratio 1.055 2 .590 Linear-by-Linear Association .094 1 .759 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.16. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Total

2


Hiburan Keduanya

Absolute

.109

Positive

.036

Negative

-.109 .302 1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak Pengasuh Anak * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh

107

Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Pengasuh Anak Saudara


% within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total Total

8

10

1.4

8.6

10.0

33.3%

21.6%

23.3%

4.7%

18.6%

23.3%

4

29

33

4.6

28.4

33.0

66.7%

78.4%

76.7%

9.3%

67.4%

76.7%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%


Total

2

Orang Lain Count Expected Count

Didampingi


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)


.429

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam Pendidikan Terakhir SD Pengasuh Anak


Total

4

3

1

8

1.9

3.7

2.4

8.0

40.0%

15.0%

7.7%

18.6%

9.3%

7.0%

2.3%

18.6%

108

SMP

SMA

Count

0

2

2

4

Expected Count

.9

1.9

1.2

4.0


.0%

10.0%

15.4%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

4.7%

9.3%

5

12

7

24

5.6

11.2

7.3

24.0


50.0%

60.0%

53.8%

55.8%

% of Total

11.6%

27.9%

16.3%

55.8%

1

3

3

7

1.6

3.3

2.1

7.0

10.0%

15.0%

23.1%

16.3%

2.3%

7.0%

7.0%

16.3%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0


Perguruan Tinggi


Total

Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total

23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%


df


Pearson Chi-Square 5.654a 6 .463 Likelihood Ratio 6.128 6 .409 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.250 1 .134 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .93. Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP Pengasuh


SMA-Perguruan Tinggi


Total

4

5

3

12

2.8

5.6

3.6

12.0

40.0%

25.0%

23.1%

27.9%

9.3%

11.6%

7.0%

27.9%

6

15

10

31

7.2

14.4

9.4

31.0

109

Total


60.0%

75.0%

76.9%

72.1%

% of Total

14.0%

34.9%

23.3%

72.1%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0


100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%


df


Pearson Chi-Square .962a 2 .618 Likelihood Ratio .919 2 .632 Linear-by-Linear Association .719 1 .396 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Durasi Menonton Televisi Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.140

Positive

.000

Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh

-.140 .411 .996

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak

SD

Count

6

2

8

6.0

2.0

8.0


18.8%

18.2%

18.6%

% of Total

14.0%

4.7%

18.6%

4

0

4

3.0

1.0

4.0

12.5%

.0%

9.3%

Expected Count

SMP

Total


110

% of Total SMA

9.3%

.0%

9.3%

18

6

24

17.9

6.1

24.0


56.3%

54.5%

55.8%

% of Total

41.9%

14.0%

55.8%

4

3

7

5.2

1.8

7.0

12.5%

27.3%

16.3%

9.3%

7.0%

16.3%

32

11

43

11.0

43.0


Perguruan Tinggi


Total


32.0

% within Onset Menonton Televisi % of Total

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

74.4%

25.6% 100.0%


df


Pearson Chi-Square 2.478a 3 .479 Likelihood Ratio 3.352 3 .340 Linear-by-Linear Association .710 1 .399 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.02. Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh

SD-SMP


>24 Bulan

Total

Count

10

2

12

Expected Count

8.9

3.1

12.0


31.3%

18.2%

27.9%

% of Total

23.3%

4.7%

27.9%

22

9

31

23.1

7.9

31.0

68.8%

81.8%

72.1%


111

% of Total Total


51.2%

20.9%

72.1%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

74.4%

25.6% 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)


df


Pearson Chi-Square .695a 1 .405 Continuity Correctionb .197 1 .657 Likelihood Ratio .738 1 .390 Fisher's Exact Test .698 Linear-by-Linear .679 1 .410 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.339

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Pendidikan Terakhir SD Pengasuh Anak

Count

2

5

1

8

Expected Count

.9

4.1

3.0

8.0

40.0%

22.7%

6.3%

18.6%

4.7%

11.6%

2.3%

18.6%

Count

0

3

1

4

Expected Count

.5

2.0

1.5

4.0


.0%

13.6%

6.3%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

3

10

11

24

2.8

12.3

8.9

24.0

60.0%

45.5%

68.8%

55.8%

7.0%

23.3%

25.6%

55.8%

0

4

3

7

% within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total SMP

SMA


Perguruan

Total

Count

112

Tinggi

Expected Count

Total

.8

3.6

2.6

7.0


.0%

18.2%

18.8%

16.3%

% of Total

.0%

9.3%

7.0%

16.3%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0


100.0% 100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0%

37.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases


df

5.655a 7.027 3.172 43

6 6 1

.463 .318 .075

a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .47. Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP Pengasuh




Total

Count Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton

2

8

2

12

1.4

6.1

4.5

12.0

40.0% 36.4%

12.5% 27.9%

4.7% 18.6%

4.7% 27.9%

3

14

14

31

3.6

15.9

11.5

31.0

60.0% 63.6%

87.5% 72.1%

7.0% 32.6%

32.6% 72.1%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

113

Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP Pengasuh




Total


2

8

2

12

1.4

6.1

4.5

12.0

40.0% 36.4%

12.5% 27.9%

4.7% 18.6%

4.7% 27.9%

3

14

14

31

3.6

15.9

11.5

31.0

60.0% 63.6%

87.5% 72.1%

7.0% 32.6%

32.6% 72.1%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

11.6% 51.2%

37.2% 100.0%


df


Pearson Chi-Square 3.033a 2 .219 Likelihood Ratio 3.290 2 .193 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.516 1 .113 N of Valid Cases 43 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.078

Positive

.078

Negative

.000 .229 1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh

114

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Didampingi Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak

SD

Count

1

7

8

1.1

6.9

8.0

16.7%

18.9%

18.6%

2.3%

16.3%

18.6%

Count

0

4

4

Expected Count

.6

3.4

4.0


.0%

10.8%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

9.3%

9.3%

4

20

24

3.3

20.7

24.0

66.7%

54.1%

55.8%

9.3%

46.5%

55.8%

1

6

7

1.0

6.0

7.0

16.7%

16.2%

16.3%

2.3%

14.0%

16.3%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total SMP

SMA


Perguruan Tinggi


Total


100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association

Total

.811a 1.357 .138


df 3 3 1

.847 .716 .710

115

N of Valid Cases 43 a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .56. Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstabulation Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Didampingi Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP Pengasuh

Count

1

11

12

1.7

10.3

12.0

16.7%

29.7%

27.9%

2.3%

25.6%

27.9%

5

26

31

4.3

26.7

31.0


83.3%

70.3%

72.1%

% of Total

11.6%

60.5%

72.1%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total


Total

Total



100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)


.455

116

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga

10

3

2

0

2

Expected Count

.5

.9

.6

2.0


.0%

10.0%

.0%

4.7%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

.0%

4.7%

4

9

7

20

4.7

9.3

6.0

20.0

40.0%

45.0%

53.8%

46.5%

9.3%

20.9%

16.3%

46.5%

4

7

4

15

3.5

7.0

4.5

15.0

40.0%

35.0%

30.8%

34.9%

9.3%

16.3%

9.3%

34.9%

Count

1

1

2

4

Expected Count

.9

1.9

1.2

4.0

10.0%

5.0%

15.4%

9.3%

2.3%

2.3%

4.7%

9.3%

Count

0

1

0

1

Expected Count

.2

.5

.3

1.0


.0%

5.0%

.0%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

.0%

2.3%

Count

1

0

0

1

Expected Count

.2

.5

.3

1.0

10.0%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Count

% of Total Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total

% within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total 6

7

% within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total Total

Total

0


5

>2 Jam

Count

Expected Count

4

1-2 Jam


117

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga

10

Count

2

0

2

1.5

.5

2.0


6.3%

.0%

4.7%

% of Total

4.7%

.0%

4.7%

16

4

20

14.9

5.1

20.0


50.0%

36.4%

46.5%

% of Total

37.2%

9.3%

46.5%

11

4

15

11.2

3.8

15.0


34.4%

36.4%

34.9%

% of Total

25.6%

9.3%

34.9%

3

1

4

3.0

1.0

4.0


9.4%

9.1%

9.3%

% of Total

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

Count

0

1

1

Expected Count

.7

.3

1.0


.0%

9.1%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

Count

0

1

1

Expected Count

.7

.3

1.0


.0%

9.1%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count

3


4


5


6

7

Total

Total


118

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga

10

3

Count

0

2

0

2

Expected Count

.2

1.0

.7

2.0


.0%

9.1%

.0%

4.7%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

.0%

4.7%

2

11

7

20

2.3

10.2

7.4

20.0

40.0%

50.0%

43.8%

46.5%

4.7%

25.6%

16.3%

46.5%

2

7

6

15

1.7

7.7

5.6

15.0

40.0%

31.8%

37.5%

34.9%

4.7%

16.3%

14.0%

34.9%

Count

0

2

2

4

Expected Count

.5

2.0

1.5

4.0


.0%

9.1%

12.5%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

4.7%

9.3%

Count

0

0

1

1

Expected Count

.1

.5

.4

1.0


.0%

.0%

6.3%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

Count

1

0

0

1

Expected Count

.1

.5

.4

1.0

20.0%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

5

22

16

43


4


5

6

7

% within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total Total

Total


5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

119

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga

10

3

0

2

2

Expected Count

.3

1.7

2.0


.0%

5.4%

4.7%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

4.7%

2

18

20

2.8

17.2

20.0

33.3%

48.6%

46.5%

4.7%

41.9%

46.5%

3

12

15

2.1

12.9

15.0

50.0%

32.4%

34.9%

7.0%

27.9%

34.9%

Count

0

4

4

Expected Count

.6

3.4

4.0


.0%

10.8%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

9.3%

9.3%

Count

1

0

1

Expected Count

.1

.9

1.0

16.7%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

.0%

2.3%

Count

0

1

1

Expected Count

.1

.9

1.0


.0%

2.7%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total Count Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total

5

6

% within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total 7

Total

Total

Count

Expected Count

4

Didampingi


6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

120

Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Jumlah Televisi di Rumah

1 buah

Count

Total

14

7

30

7.0

14.0

9.1

30.0


90.0%

70.0%

53.8%

69.8%

% of Total

20.9%

32.6%

16.3%

69.8%

1

6

6

13

3.0

6.0

3.9

13.0

10.0%

30.0%

46.2%

30.2%

2.3%

14.0%

14.0%

30.2%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

30.2%

100.0%

> 1buah Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total

23.3%

46.5%


df



>2 Jam

9

Expected Count

Total

1-2 Jam

Absolute

.228

Positive

.228

Negative

.000 .687 .732

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah

121

Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan Jumlah Televisi di Rumah

1 buah

Count

21

9

30

22.3

7.7

30.0


65.6%

81.8%

69.8%

% of Total

48.8%

20.9%

69.8%

11

2

13

9.7

3.3

13.0


34.4%

18.2%

30.2%

% of Total

25.6%

4.7%

30.2%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count

> 1buah Count Expected Count

Total

Total


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.018a 1 .313 b Continuity Correction .395 1 .530 Likelihood Ratio 1.088 1 .297 Fisher's Exact Test .456 Linear-by-Linear .994 1 .319 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.271

Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Jumlah Televisi di Rumah

1 buah


Total

5

15

10

30

3.5

15.3

11.2

30.0

100.0%

68.2%

62.5%

69.8%

122

% of Total

11.6%

34.9%

23.3%

69.8%

0

7

6

13

1.5

6.7

4.8

13.0


.0%

31.8%

37.5%

30.2%

% of Total

.0%

16.3%

14.0%

30.2%

5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

> 1buah Count Expected Count

Total


100.0% 100.0% 11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0% 37.2% 100.0%

Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.167

Positive

.167

Negative

.000 .502 .963

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Jumlah Televisi di Rumah

1 buah


> 1buah Count Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total Total


Didampingi

Total

3

27

30

4.2

25.8

30.0

50.0%

73.0%

69.8%

7.0%

62.8%

69.8%

3

10

13

1.8

11.2

13.0

50.0%

27.0%

30.2%

7.0%

23.3%

30.2%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

123


100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%


Df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.292a 1 .256 Continuity Correctionb .432 1 .511 Likelihood Ratio 1.204 1 .273 Fisher's Exact Test .345 Linear-by-Linear 1.262 1 .261 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.248

Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Durasi Menonton Televisi Crosstab Durasi Menonton Televisi <1 Jam Televisi di Kamar Tidur

Tidak Ada

Count

9

27

6.3

12.6

8.2

27.0


70.0%

55.0%

69.2%

62.8%

% of Total

16.3%

25.6%

20.9%

62.8%

3

9

4

16

3.7

7.4

4.8

16.0

30.0%

45.0%

30.8%

37.2%

7.0%

20.9%

9.3%

37.2%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total Count Expected Count % within Durasi Menonton Televisi % of Total Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association

Total

11

Count

Total

>2 Jam

7

Expected Count

Ada

1-2 Jam

.973a .974 .002


df 2 2 1

.615 .614 .960

124

N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.72. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Durasi Menonton Televisi Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.083

Positive

.072

Negative

-.083 .264 1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Onset Menonton Televisi Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan Televisi di Kamar Tidur

Tidak Ada Count

20

7

27

20.1

6.9

27.0


62.5%

63.6%

62.8%

% of Total

46.5%

16.3%

62.8%

12

4

16

11.9

4.1

16.0


37.5%

36.4%

37.2%

% of Total

27.9%

9.3%

37.2%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count

Ada


Total

Total


Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctionb Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test

.005a .000 .005


df 1 1 1

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.946 1.000 .946 1.000

.621

125

Linear-by-Linear .004 1 .947 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.09. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Program Televisi yang ditonton Crosstab Program Televisi yang ditonton Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Televisi di Kamar Tidur

Tidak Ada

Count

5

10

12

27

3.1

13.8

10.0

27.0

100.0%

45.5%

75.0%

62.8%

11.6%

23.3%

27.9%

62.8%

0

12

4

16

1.9

8.2

6.0

16.0


.0%

54.5%

25.0%

37.2%

% of Total

.0%

27.9%

9.3%

37.2%

Expected Count % within Program Televisi yang ditonton % of Total

Ada


Total


5

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total

11.6%

51.2%

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

6.814a 8.454 .002 43


df 2 2 1

.033 .015 .964

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.86. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Test Statisticsa Program Televisi yang ditonton Most Extreme Differences

Total

Absolute

.194

Positive

.185

Negative

-.194

100.0% 100.0% 37.2% 100.0%

126

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur

.616 .842

Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstab Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Tidak Didampingi Televisi di Kamar Tidur

Tidak Ada Count Expected Count % within Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh % of Total Ada


Total


Didampingi

Total

4

23

27

3.8

23.2

27.0

66.7%

62.2%

62.8%

9.3%

53.5%

62.8%

2

14

16

2.2

13.8

16.0

33.3%

37.8%

37.2%

4.7%

32.6%

37.2%

6

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .045a 1 .832 b Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .045 1 .831 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 Linear-by-Linear .044 1 .834 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.23. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.606

127

Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Frequency Valid

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Percent

Normal

30

69.8

69.8

69.8

Suspek Terlambat Bicara

13

30.2

30.2

100.0

Total

43

100.0

100.0

Durasi Menonton Televisi * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Crosstab Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Suspek Keterlambatan Bicara Durasi Menonton Televisi

>2 jam per hari

Total

Count

12

1

13

Expected Count

3.9

9.1

13.0

% within Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale

92.3%

3.3% 30.2%

% of Total

27.9%

2.3% 30.2%

<1 jam dan 1-2 jam Count per hari Expected Count

Total

Normal

1

29

30

9.1

20.9

30.0


7.7%

96.7% 69.8%

% of Total

2.3%

67.4% 69.8%

Count Expected Count % within Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale % of Total

13

30

43

13.0

30.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctionb Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

34.041a 29.953 36.883


df 1 1 1

.000 .000 .000 .000

33.249 43

1

.000

.000

128

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.93. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Durasi Menonton Televisi (>2 jam per hari / <1 jam dan 1-2 jam per hari) For cohort Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale = Suspek Keterlambatan Bicara For cohort Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale = Normal N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

348.000

20.084

6029.883

27.692

4.006

191.436

.080

.012

.524

43

Onset Menonton Televisi * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Crosstab Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Suspek Keterlambatan Bicara Onset Menonton Televisi

0-24 Bulan Count

Total

13

19

32

9.7

22.3

32.0

100.0%

63.3%

74.4%

30.2%

44.2%

74.4%

0

11

11

3.3

7.7

11.0


.0%

36.7%

25.6%

% of Total

.0%

25.6%

25.6%

Expected Count % within Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale % of Total >24 Bulan Count Expected Count

Total

Normal


13

30

43

13.0

30.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctionb

6.405a 4.624


df 1 1

.011 .032

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

129

Likelihood Ratio 9.473 1 .002 Fisher's Exact Test .019 Linear-by-Linear 6.256 1 .012 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.009

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value For cohort Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale = Normal N of Valid Cases

Lower

.594

Upper

.446

.791

43

Program Televisi yang ditonton * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Crosstab Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Suspek Keterlambatan Bicara Program Televisi yang ditonton

Hiburan dan Keduanya

Edukasi


Total

10

28

38

11.5

26.5

38.0


76.9%

93.3% 88.4%

% of Total

23.3%

65.1% 88.4%


Total

Normal


3

2

5

1.5

3.5

5.0

23.1%

6.7% 11.6%

7.0%

4.7% 11.6%

13

30

43

13.0

30.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square

2.377a


df 1

.123

130

Continuity Correctionb 1.048 1 .306 Likelihood Ratio 2.171 1 .141 Fisher's Exact Test .153 Linear-by-Linear 2.322 1 .128 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.51. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.153

Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Program Televisi yang ditonton (Hiburan dan Keduanya / Edukasi) For cohort Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale = Suspek Keterlambatan Bicara For cohort Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale = Normal N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

.238

.035

1.639

.439

.180

1.070

1.842

.619

5.480

43

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Crosstab Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Suspek Keterlambatan Bicara Pendampingan Orang Tidak Tua / Pengasuh Didampingi

Count

3

6

1.8

4.2

6.0

23.1%

10.0%

14.0%

7.0%

7.0%

14.0%

10

27

37

11.2

25.8

37.0


76.9%

90.0%

86.0%

% of Total

23.3%

62.8%

86.0%

13

30

43

30.0

43.0

Expected Count

% of Total Count Expected Count

Total

Total

3

% within Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale Didampingi

Normal


13.0 100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

131


df


Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.292a 1 .256 Continuity Correctionb .432 1 .511 Likelihood Ratio 1.204 1 .273 Fisher's Exact Test .345 Linear-by-Linear 1.262 1 .261 Association N of Valid Cases 43 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Odds Ratio for Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh (Tidak Didampingi / Didampingi) For cohort Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale = Suspek Keterlambatan Bicara For cohort Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale = Normal N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

2.700

.466

15.648

1.850

.709

4.829

.685

.301

1.562

43

.248

132

Lampiran 7. Kuesioner pola menonton televisi DATA KARAKTERISTIK SUBJEK No. Urut : ________ (diisi oleh peneliti) Nama orangtua : ______________________________________________ Jenis kelamin : Laki-laki Perempuan Nama anak : ______________________________________________ Jenis kelamin : Laki-laki Perempuan Tanggal lahir : Tanggal ________ Bulan ________ Tahun ___________ Usia kehamilan saat melahirkan : ________________ minggu Berat badan lahir : ________________ gram Berat badan : ________________ kg (diisi peneliti) Tinggi / panjang badan : ________________ cm (diisi peneliti) Status gizi : ________________ (diisi peneliti) Hasil pemeriksaan Capute scales : ________________ (diisi peneliti) Riwayat gangguan perkembangan Jika Ya, sebutkan

: Ya Tidak : ____________________________ : ____________________________ : Ya Tidak : Ya Tidak : Ya Tidak : Ya Tidak : Ya Tidak

Riwayat cacat bawaan Riwayat kelainan saraf Riwayat gangguan pendengaran Riwayat cedera kepala / gegar otak Riwayat opname (rawat inap) Jika Ya : Lama dirawat : ____________________________ Sebab dirawat : ____________________________ Diagnosa (informasi dari tenaga kesehatan) : ____________________________ Riwayat panas tinggi dan kejang : ____________________________ Riwayat menderita penyakit lain (sebutkan) : ______________________ Riwayat lamanya menderita sakit : < 1 bulan 1-3 bulan > 3 bulan Apakah anak mempunyai saudara kembar : Ya Tidak Jika Ya , Nama saudara kembaran : ____________________________ Hasil pemeriksaan Capute scales :_________________(diisi peneliti) Bahasa yang digunakan orang tua untuk berbicara dengan anak (tuliskan) :_______________________ Bahasa yang digunakan pengasuh di TPA/PAUD untuk berbicara dengan anak :_______________________

133

Pendidikan terakhir ayah* : Tidak sekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3 Pendidikan terakhir ibu* : Tidak sekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3 Pekerjaan ayah : _________________________ Pekerjaan ibu : _________________________ Pekerjaan anggota keluarga lain (bila ada)** : _________________________ Pendapatan ayah : Pendapatan ibu : a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan b. Rp 1.000.000 – 3.000.000 / bulan b. Rp 1.000.000 – 3.000.000 / bulan c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan

Pendapatan anggota keluarga lain (bila ada): a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan b. Rp 1.000.000-3.000.000 / bulan c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan Jumlah tanggungan***

: __________________ orang

Pengasuh anak selain ayah dan ibu*

: a. Pembantu/pengasuh/babysitter b. Kakek/nenek/bibi/paman c. Tetangga/orang lain

Pendidikan terakhir pengasuh*:Tidaksekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3 Biasanya anak diantar pada pukul ___ dan dijemput pada pukul ____ dari TPA/PAUD Anak berada di TPA/PAUD pada hari*: Senin/Selasa/Rabu/Kamis/Jumat/Sabtu/minggu Alamat rumah No. telp rumah No. HP Alamat tempat kerja No. telp tempat kerja

: _________________________________________ : _________________________________________ : _________________________________________ : _________________________________________ : _________________________________________

Keterangan: *lingkari yang benar **anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah selain bapak dan ibu ***jumlah tanggungan adalah jumlah seluruh anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah

134

KUISIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN POLA MENONTON TELEVISI DENGAN KETERLAMBATAN BICARA Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang Nama anak : ___________________________________________________ TPA/PAUD : ___________________________________________________ Nama pengisi : ___________________________________________________

Jumlah televisi dalam rumah : _____ buah a. 1 buah b. ≥ 2 buah Apakah terdapat televisi dalam kamar tempat anak tidur? a. Ya b. Tidak Berapa lama anak menonton televisi dalam satu hari pada hari sekolah? a. < 1 jam b. 1-2 jam c. > 2 jam Berapa lama anak menonton televisi dalam satu hari pada hari libur? a. < 1 jam b. 1-2 jam c. > 2 jam Apakah anak selalu didampingi ketika menonton televisi? a. Ya b. Tidak Usia pertama kali anak mulai menonton televisi : a. 0-24 bulan

b. > 24 bulan Jika ya, dengan siapa anak paling sering didampingi saat menonton televisi? a. Orang tua b. Pengasuh/pembantu/baby sitter c. Kakek/nenek/paman/bibi Apa yang dilakukan pendamping/ pengasuh saat anak menonton televisi? a. Menemani tanpa berinteraksi dengan anak (hanya menonton atau sambil mengerjakan pekerjaan lain) b. Menyuapi anak c. Berinteraksi dengan anak (mengajak anak berbicara, menjelaskan, memilihkan program dan bercerita tentang program yang ditonton anak) Acara televisi yang paling disukai anak : a. Kesenian (musik, tarian,gambar) b. Olahraga c. Flora fauna d. Sinetron e. Kartun (sebutkan) _________ f. Kuis g. Pendidikan h. Lain-lain (sebutkan)________

135

BUKU HARIAN ANAK 1X24 JAM PADA HARI SEKOLAH Hari, tanggal Nama anak TPA/PAUD Nama pengisi

: __________ : _____________________________________________________ : _____________________________________________________ : _____________________________________________________

Waktu (Jam : Menit)

Kegiatan Anak

Didampingi

Keterangan

Oleh

(jenis/judul tontonan)

Keterangan : Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak pada saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman / bibi / teman / pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan jenis/judul tayangan yang ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi .

136

BUKU HARIAN ANAK 1X24 JAM PADA HARI LIBUR Hari, tanggal Nama anak TPA/PAUD Nama pengisi Waktu (Jam : Menit)

: __________ : ____________________________________________________ : _____________________________________________________ : _____________________________________________________ Kegiatan Anak

Didampingi

Keterangan

Oleh

(jenis/judul tontonan)

Keterangan : Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak pada saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman / bibi / teman / pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan jenis/judul tayangan yang ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi.

137

DATA KARAKTERISTIK TPA / PAUD No. Urut Nama TPA / PAUD Alamat

Nama Kepala Sekolah Nama Guru / Pengasuh

Nama pengisi

: ________ (diisi oleh peneliti) : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________ : _______________________________________

Jumlah televisi di TPA / PAUD : _____ a. 1 buah b. ≥ 2 buah Apakah terdapat televisi dalam kamar tempat anak tidur? a. Ya b. Tidak Berapa lama televisi dinyalakan dalam satu hari? a. < 1 jam b. 1-2 jam c. > 2 jam Usia pertama kali anak mulai menonton televisi : a. 0-24 bulan b. > 24 bulan Apakah anak selalu didampingi ketika menonton televisi? a. Ya b. Tidak

Apa yang dilakukan pendamping/ pengasuh saat anak menonton televisi? a. Menemani tanpa berinteraksi dengan anak (hanya menonton atau sambil mengerjakan pekerjaan lain) b. Menyuapi anak c. Berinteraksi dengan anak (mengajak anak berbicara, menjelaskan, memilihkan program dan bercerita tentang isi program yang ditonton anak Acara televisi yang paling disukai anak : a. Kesenian (musik, tarian, gambar) b. Olahraga c. Flora fauna d. Sinetron e. Kartun (sebutkan) ___________ f. Kuis g. Pendidikan h. Lain-lain (sebutkan) _________

138

Lampiran 8. Capute scales scoring sheet

139

140

141

142

Lampiran 9. Dokumentasi penelitian

143

144

Lampiran 10. Biodata mahasiswa Identitas Nama

: Ani Safitri

NIM

: G2A009074

Tempat/tanggal lahir : Gogodalem Semarang, 7 November 1990 Jenis kelamin

: Perempuan

Alamat

: Dusun Mulya Jaya RT 005 RW 003 Desa Sei Bawang Kec. Singingi Kab. Kuantan Singing

Riau Nomor Telepon

: -

Nomor HP

: 085641196888

e-mail

: [email protected]

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal 1. SD

: SD Negeri 030 Singingi

Lulus tahun: 2002

2. SMP

: SMP Negeri 1 Kuantan Singingi

Lulus tahun: 2005

3. SMA

: SMA Negeri 1 Kuantan Singingi

Lulus tahun: 2008

4. FK UNDIP

: Masuk tahun : 2009

Keanggotaan Organisasi 1. (Belum ada)

Pengalaman penelitian 1. (Belum ada)

Pengalaman publikasi tulisan ilmiah 1. (Belum ada)

145

Pengalaman presentasi karya ilmiah 1. (Belum ada)

Pengalaman mengikuti lomba karya ilmiah 1. (Belum ada)

11. Oka Lely. Jika anak terlambat bicara Available from : 12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement

Recommend Documents