64
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Panjaitan, R. Pharmaceutical care untuk pasien penyakit artritis rematik. Jakarta: Direktorat Bina Farmasi Komunitas dan Klinik, Ditjen Bina Kefarmasian dan Alat Kesehatan, Departemen Kesehatan; 2006. 2. Andriyasa, K, Tjokorda Raka Putra. Korelasi antara derajat beratnya osteoartritis lutut dan cartilage oligomeric matrix protein serum. J Peny Dalam. 2012: 13(1):10. 3. M.A., Sabara-Saga. Diet intensif dan aktifitas fisik untuk wanita lansia penderita osteoartritis dengan obesitas. Medula. 2013: 2(1):115. 4. Nursyarifah, R.S. Hubungan antara obesitas dengan kejadian osteoartritis lutut
di
RSUP
dr.
Kariadi
Semarang.
Semarang:
Universitas
Muhammadiyah Semarang; 2012. 5. Koentjoro, Sara Listyani, J. Adji Suroso, Bantar Suntoko. Hubungan antara indeks massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat osteoartritis lutut menurut Kellgren-Lawrence.
Semarang:
Fakultas
Kedokteran
Universitas
Diponegoro; 2010. 6. Altman, R.D. Criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip. Scand J Rheumatology. 1987; (Suppl.65):31-39. 7. Soeroso J, Isbagio H, Kalim H, Broto R, Pramudiyo R. Osteoartritis. In: Sudoyo AW, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, Simadibrata M, Setiati S, editors. Buku ajar ilmu penyakit dalam. 4th ed. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Ilmu Penyakit Dalam Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2006. p. 1195-1201. 8. Firestein Gary S, Ralph C.Budd, Edward D. Harris, Iain B.McInnes, Shaun Ruddy, John S.Sergent. Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology 8th edition volume II. Canada: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. 9. Moskowitz, Roland W., David S. Howell, Roy D. Altman, Joseph A. Buckwalter, Victor M. Goldberg. Osteoarthritis 3rd edition diagnosis and medical / surgical management. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2001.
65
10. Gabriella M van Dijk, Cindy Veenhof, Francous Shchellevis, Harry Hulsmans, Jan PJ Bakker, Henk Arwert, et al. Comorbidity, limitations in activities and pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008;9:95. 11. Palmer, Keith T. Occupational activities and osteoarthritis of the knee. British Medical Bulletin. 2012; 102:147-170. 12. Kulcu, Duygu Geler, Burcu Yanik, Hakan Atalar, Gulcin Gulsen. Associated factors with pain and disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology. 2010; 25(2):077-081. (Abstrak) 13. Kalim, Handono, Sri Andarini,
Faradiana Rasyidi. Hubungan indeks
massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat nyeri pada penderita osteoartritis lutut. Malang: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya; 2012. 14. Reijman, M., H A P Pols, A P Bergink, J M W Hazes, J N Belo, A M Lievense et al. Body mass index associated with onset and progression of osteoarthritis of the knee but not of the hip: The Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66:158-162. 15. Koesoemawati, Herni, Huriawati Hartanto, Ivo Novita Salim, Lyana Setiawan, Valleria, Wanny Suparman. Kamus kedokteran Dorland edisi 29. Jakarta: EGC; 2000. 16. Marsland, Daniel, Sabrina Kapoor. Crash course rheumatology and orthopaedics 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. 17. Price, Sylvia A, Lorraine M. Wilson. Patofisiologi konsep klinis prosesproses penyakit edisi 6. Jakarta: EGC; 2003. 18. Sadhana, Udadi. Patologi anatomi 2. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2011. 19. Adnan HM. Diagnosis arthritis rheumatoid dan perbandingannya arthritisarthritis lain. Kongres Nasional I, Ikatan Reumatologi Indonesia, Semarang, 1983 : 43-57.
66
20. Fauci, Anthony S., Dennis L. Kasper, Dan L. Longo, Eugene Braunwald, Stephen L. Hauser, J. Larry Jameson et al. Harrison’s principles of general medicine 17th edition. 2008. p. 2159-2161. 21. Maharani, Eka Pratiwi. Faktor-faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2007. 22. Soejoto, Soetedjo, Sultana MH Faradz, RB Bambang W, Neni Susilaningsih, Ratna D Purnawati et al. Lecture notes histologi I. Semarang: Bagian Histologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2011. 23. JF, Woessner, Gunja-Smith Z. Role of metalloproteinases in human osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991; 27:99-101. 24. Patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: an important subgroup of knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2007; 46(7):1057-1062.(Abstrak) 25. Wahyuningsih, Nur Aini Sri. Hubungan obesitas dengan osteoartritis lutut pada lansia di Kelurahan Puncangsawit Kecamatan Jebres Surakarta. Surakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta; 2009. 26. Ambardini, Rachmah Laksmi. Peran Latihan Fisik dalam Manajemen Terpadu Osteoartritis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 27. Waddell D.D. Integrating viscosupplementation into a comprehensive osteoarthritis treatment program. Medscape Multispecialty; 2014. 28. Cooper C et al. in: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds, Osteoarthritis. Oxford, NY. Oxford University Press; 1998, page 237-249 29. Marc
C.
Hochberg
et
al.
Recommendations
for
the
use
of
nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care & Research. 2012; 64(4):465-474. 30. Syarif, Amir, Ari Estuningtyas, Arini Setiawati, H. Armen Muchtar, Azalla Arif, Bahroelim Bahry et al. Farmakologi dan terapi edisi 5. Jakarta: Departemen Farmakologi dan Terapeutik Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2007.
67
31. Dieppe, Paul A., Lohmander L. Stefan. Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. The Lancet. 2005; 365 : 965 – 973. 32. Lequesne MG. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997; 24(4):779-81. 33. Basaran, S., Rengin Guzel, Gulsah Seydaoglu, Fusun Guler-Uysal. Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 29:749-756. 34. Murphy L, Bolen J, Helmick CG, Brady TJ. Comorbidities are very common among people with arthritis. Poster 43. 20th National Conference on Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, CDC. Feb 2009. 35. Sabah J-M AL Rubiae, Ali AL-Qazaz. The frequency of comorbidities associated with knee osteoarthritis in men and women in Babylon and their impact on pain. Medical Journla of Babylon. 2014; 8:4. 36. Leite, Alice Abath, Aline Jurema Gesteira Costa et al. co morbidities in patients with osteoarthritis: frequency and impact on pain and physical function. Rev Bras Reumatol 2011;51(2):113-123. 37. Schmitt, Laura C et al. Instability, laxity, and physical function in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. Dec 2008; 88(12): 1508-1516. 38. Kim KW, Han JW, Cho HJ, Chang CB, Park JH, Lee JJ et al. Association between comorbid depression and osteoarthritis symptom severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 2011 Mar 16;93(6):556-63. (Abstrak) 39. Mansournia MA et al. Effect of physical activity on functional performance and knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis : analysis with marginal structural models. Epidemiology. 2012 Jul;23(4):631-40. 40. Bosomworth, N.J. Exercise and knee osteoarthritis: benefit or hazard? CFP (Canadian Family Physician). 2009 Sept:55(9):871-878.(Full text) 41. Niu J, Zhang YQ, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, et al. Is obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):329-35.(Abstrak)
68
42. Graverand MPHL, Brandt K, Mazzuca SA, Raunig D, Vignon E. Progressive increase in body mass index is not associated with a progressive increase in joint space narrowing in obese women with osteoarthritis of the knee. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2009;68:1734-1738.(Abstrak) 43. N. Belo J, Berger MY, Reijman M, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb 15;57(1):13-26.(Abstrak) 44. Manninen, P., H. Riihimäki, M. Heliövaara, O. Suomalainen. Physical exercise and risk of severe knee osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty. Oxford Journals. Rheumatology (2001) 40 (4): 432-437.
69
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance
70
Lampiran 2. Ijin penelitian
71
72
Lampiran 3. Sampel Informed consent
JUDUL PENELITIAN
: Hubungan antara Faktor Risiko Osteoartritis Lutut dengan
Nyeri, Disabilitas, dan Berat Ringannya
Osteoartritis INSTANSI PELAKSANA
: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
PENELITI
: Maya Yanuarty (CP : 085642993128)
Persetujuan Setelah Penjelasan (INFORMED CONSENT) Bapak/Ibu Yth : Peneliti tersebut di atas adalah Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro yang bermaksud ingin melibatkan Bapak/Ibu untuk menjadi responden dalam penelitian ini dengan tujuan mengetahui hubungan antara faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut dengan nyeri, disabilitas, dan berat ringannya osteoartritis. Osteoartritis sendiri merupakan peradangan pada sendi yang menyebabkan timbulnya rasa nyeri dan kaku pada sendi yang terkena. Penelitian ini bermanfaat dalam bidang akademik yaitu sebagai sumbangan ilmu pengetahuan. Keuntungan yang dapat diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah Bapak/Ibu dapat mengetahui faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut yang Bapak/Ibu miliki yang berkaitan dengan nyeri dan kaku sendi, apabila Bapak/Ibu menghubungi peneliti dalam waktu minimal 3 bulan setelah penelitian. Penelitian ini juga dapat bermanfaat dalam bidang pelayanan kesehatan, yaitu sebagai pertimbangan penerapan terapi dan edukasi lebih lanjut pada pasien osteoartritis lutut selanjutnya. Peneliti akan melakukan wawancara, pengukuran tinggi dan berat badan kepada Bapak/Ibu, dan mengumpulkan data yang ada di rekam medis tentang berat ringannya osteoartritis lutut. Peneliti menjamin kerahasiaan identitas dan informasi yang diberikan. Informasi tersebut hanya digunakan untuk kepentingan penelitian serta pengembangan ilmu kedokteran. Apabila dalam perjalanan nantinya, Bapak/Ibu menghendaki mengundurkan diri, maka peneliti menghormati keinginan tersebut. Pada akhir wawancara, peneliti akan memberikan sebuah souvenir / bingkisan sebagai ungkapan terima kasih atas kerjasama Bapak/Ibu.
73
74
Lampiran 4. Spreadsheet data No Nama Usia Sex BB
TB
IMT
Kriteria IMT
Komorbid
1
K
59
P
73
1.52
31.6
Obesitas derajat 2
0
2
P
55
P
48.5
1.455
22.9
Normal
<3
3
W
61
P
54
1.45
25.7
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
4
S
66
P
74
1.45
35.2
Obesitas derajat 2
>3
5
M
58
L
58
1.59
22.9
Normal
>3
6
M
69
P
66
1.53
28.2
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
7
MD
68
L
79
1.7
27.3
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
8
P
57
P
54.5
1.51
23.9
Overweight
>3
9
S
51
L
116
1.63
43.7
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
10
EY
54
P
62
1.55
25.8
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
11
Z
58
P
43
1.55
17.9
Underweight
0
12
W
67
L
57
1.7
19.7
Normal
<3
13
PN
61
P
58
1.54
24.5
Overweight
<3
14
SS
65
P
71.5
1.495
32
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
15
JH
57
P
61
1.55
25.4
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
16
S
74
P
66
1.515
28.8
Normal
<3
17
SH
74
L
66
1.6
25.8
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
18
SW
52
P
87
1.69
30.5
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
19
I
62
P
51.5
1.47
23.8
Overweight
<3
20
ES
56
P
65
1.38
34.1
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
21
S
58
P
57
1.485
25.8
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
22
S
60
P
76.5
1.62
29.1
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
23
NM
52
P
76
1.43
37.2
Obesitas derajat 2
>3
24
S
66
L
60
1.67
21.5
Normal
<3
25
SR
60
P
54
1.485
24.5
Overweight
0
26
S
66
P
52
1.455
24.6
Overweight
>3
27
EI
57
P
67
1.54
28.3
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
28
S
73
P
34
1.435
16.5
Underweight
>3
29
SM
51
P
58
1.51
25.4
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
30
MA
65
P
68
1.5
30.2
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
31
M
52
P
76
1.56
31.2
Obesitas derajat 2
>3
32
S
68
P
72
1.59
28.5
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
33
TNS
58
P
70
1.52
30.3
Obesitas derajat 2
>3
75
No
Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi
Nyeri
Disabilitas
Kriteria skor WOMAC
Grade OA
1 2
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 2
No weight bearing
ya
Berat
Berat
Berat
Grade 1
3
No weight bearing
tidak
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
4 5
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
6
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 4
7 8
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
9
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Berat
Sedang
Grade 4
10 11
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
12
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
13
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
14
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Berat
Sedang
Grade 4
15
No weight bearing
ya
Berat
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
16 17
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
18
Weight bearing
tidak
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
19 20
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
21
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Sedang
Ringan
Grade 2
22 23
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
24
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
25 26
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
27
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
28
No weight bearing
tidak
Berat
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
29
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
30
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
31 32
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
33
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
76
No
Nama
Usia
Sex
BB
TB
IMT
Kriteria IMT
Komorbid
34
AEL
54
P
74
1.51
32.5
Obesitas derajat 2
>3
35
S
76
L
42
1.59
16.6
Underweight
>3
36
AR
51
P
81.5
1.48
37.2
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
37
S
74
L
71
1.65
26.1
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
38
R
55
P
89
1.54
37.5
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
39
KM
64
L
72
1.635
26.9
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
40
MYS
56
P
74
1.58
29.6
Obesitas derajat 1
>3
41
SD
57
P
57.5
1.57
23.3
Overweight
>3
42
W
68
P
49
1.44
23.6
Overweight
<3
43
A
68
L
68
1.62
25.9
Overweight
>3
44
S
53
L
65.5
1.66
23.8
Overweight
0
45
R
69
P
53
1.46
24.9
Overweight
<3
46
R
51
P
81
1.495
36.2
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
47
R
72
L
80
1.72
27
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
48
IS
64
P
68
1.5
30.2
Obesitas derajat 2
0
49
TMK
51
P
77
1.44
37.1
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
50
M
64
P
63
1.515
27.4
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
51
S
53
L
69
1.53
29.5
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
52
N
51
P
71
1.48
32.4
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
53
SBW
60
P
71
1.62
27.1
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
54
R
55
P
84
1.56
34.5
Obesitas derajat 2
>3
55
R
51
P
60
1.535
25.5
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
56
SM
59
P
62
1.51
27.2
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
57
M
55
P
90
1.49
40.5
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
58
K
66
P
59
1.47
27.3
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
59
S
64
L
96
1.68
34
Obesitas derajat 2
>3
60
I
67
P
63
1.52
27.3
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
61
RO
56
P
55
1.56
22.6
Normal
<3
62
MK
74
L
48
1.61
18.5
Normal
0
63
M
64
P
54.5
1.48
24.9
Overweight
<3
64
SN
70
P
84.5
1.46
39.6
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
65
MSH
60
P
46
1.53
19.7
Normal
<3
77
No
Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi
Nyeri
Disabilitas
Kriteria skor WOMAC
Grade OA
34
No weight bearing
ya
Berat
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 2
35
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Sedang
Ringan
Grade 2
36
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Berat
Sedang
Grade 4
37 38
No weight bearing No weight bearing
ya ya
Ringan Sedang Berat Sedang
Sedang Sedang
Grade 2 Grade 4
39
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
40
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
41 42
Weight bearing No weight bearing
tidak ya
Ringan Ringan Sedang Berat
Ringan Berat
Grade 2 Grade 1
43
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
44
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
45 46
No weight bearing No weight bearing
tidak ya
Ringan Ringan Sedang Sedang
Ringan Sedang
Grade 1 Grade 3
47
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Berat
Sedang
Grade 3
48
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
49 50
No weight bearing No weight bearing
ya tidak
Sedang Sedang Ringan Sedang
Sedang Ringan
Grade 4 Grade 3
51
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
52
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
53 54
No weight bearing No weight bearing
ya ya
Ringan Ringan Sedang Sedang
Ringan Sedang
Grade 1 Grade 1
55
Weight bearing
tidak
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
56
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 2
57 58
Weight bearing No weight bearing
tidak ya
Sedang Sedang Ringan Ringan
Sedang Ringan
Grade 4 Grade 2
59
No weight bearing
ya
Berat
Berat
Grade 4
60 61
No weight bearing No weight bearing
ya ya
Ringan Ringan Ringan Ringan
Ringan Ringan
Grade 4 Grade 3
62
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Berat
Berat
Grade 3
63
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Sedang
Ringan
Grade 2
64 65
No weight bearing No weight bearing
tidak ya
Sedang Ringan Ringan Ringan
Ringan Ringan
Grade 4 Grade 1
Berat
78
Lampiran 5. Output analisis data Frequencies Jenis Kelamin
Valid
pria wanita Total
Frequency 15 50 65
Percent 23.1 76.9 100.0
Valid Percent 23.1 76.9 100.0
Cumulative Percent 23.1 100.0
Usia
Valid
Frequency 7 3 2 2 4 3 4 4 2 4 2 1 5 2 4 2 4 2 1 1 1 4 1 65
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 72 73 74 76 Total
Percent 10.8 4.6 3.1 3.1 6.2 4.6 6.2 6.2 3.1 6.2 3.1 1.5 7.7 3.1 6.2 3.1 6.2 3.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 6.2 1.5 100.0
Valid Percent 10.8 4.6 3.1 3.1 6.2 4.6 6.2 6.2 3.1 6.2 3.1 1.5 7.7 3.1 6.2 3.1 6.2 3.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 6.2 1.5 100.0
Cumulative Percent 10.8 15.4 18.5 21.5 27.7 32.3 38.5 44.6 47.7 53.8 56.9 58.5 66.2 69.2 75.4 78.5 84.6 87.7 89.2 90.8 92.3 98.5 100.0
Statistics Usia N
Valid Missing
Mode Minimum Maximum
65 0 51 51 76
Tests of Normality a Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Usia .105 65 .071 .945 65 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Sig. .006
79
Riwayat Fisioterapi
Valid
ya
Frequency 51
Percent 78.5
Valid Percent 78.5
Cumulative Percent 78.5 100.0
tidak
14
21.5
21.5
Total
65
100.0
100.0
Kriteria IMT
Valid
Frequency 3 8 11 22 21 65
Underweight Normal Overweight Obesitas derajat 1 Obesitas derajat 2 Total
Percent 4.6 12.3 16.9 33.8 32.3 100.0
Cumulative Percent 4.6 16.9 33.8 67.7 100.0
Valid Percent 4.6 12.3 16.9 33.8 32.3 100.0
Penyakit Komorbid
Valid
Tidak ada Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Total
Frequency 6 36
Percent 9.2 55.4
Valid Percent 9.2 55.4
Cumulative Percent 9.2 64.6
23
35.4
35.4
100.0
65
100.0
100.0
Aktivitas Fisik
Valid
Weight bearing No weight bearing Total
Frequency 9
Percent 13.8
Valid Percent 86.2
Cumulative Percent 86.2
56
86.2
13.8
100.0
65
100.0
100.0
Nyeri Cumulative Frequency Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
Ringan
32
49.2
49.2
49.2
Sedang
27
41.5
41.5
90.8
Berat
6
9.2
9.2
100.0
Total
65
100.0
100.0
80
Disabilitas
Valid
Ringan Sedang Berat Total
Frequency 30 27 8 65
Percent 46.2 41.5 12.3 100.0
Valid Percent 46.2 41.5 12.3 100.0
Cumulative Percent 46.2 87.7 100.0
Grade OA Lutut
Valid
Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total
Frequency 14 16 19 16 65
Percent 21.5 24.6 29.2 24.6 100.0
Valid Percent 21.5 24.6 29.2 24.6 100.0
Cumulative Percent 21.5 46.2 75.4 100.0
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang Kriteria IMT Underweight Count 2 0 Expected Count 1.5 1.2 % within Nyeri 6.3% .0% % of Total 3.1% .0% Normal Count 5 2 Expected Count 3.9 3.3 % within Nyeri 15.6% 7.4% % of Total 7.7% 3.1% Overweight Count 5 6 Expected Count 5.4 4.6 % within Nyeri 15.6% 22.2% % of Total 7.7% 9.2% Obesitas derajat 1 Count 15 6 Expected Count 10.8 9.1 % within Nyeri 46.9% 22.2% % of Total 23.1% 9.2% Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 13 Expected Count 10.3 8.7 % within Nyeri 15.6% 48.1% % of Total 7.7% 20.0% Total Count 32 27 Expected Count 32.0 27.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5%
Berat
Total
1 .3 16.7% 1.5% 1 .7 16.7% 1.5% 0 1.0 .0% .0% 1 2.0 16.7% 1.5% 3 1.9 50.0% 4.6% 6 6.0 100.0% 9.2%
3 3.0 4.6% 4.6% 8 8.0 12.3% 12.3% 11 11.0 16.9% 16.9% 22 22.0 33.8% 33.8% 21 21.0 32.3% 32.3% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
81
Chi-Square Tests Value a 14.361 16.247 1.695
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 8 .073 8 .039 1 .193
65
a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .28. Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation Ringan Kriteria IMT
Underweight / Normal
Count Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total
Overweight
Obesitas derajat 1
Obesitas derajat 2
Total
7 5.4 21.9% 10.8% 5 5.4 15.6% 7.7% 15 10.8 46.9% 23.1% 5 10.3 15.6% 7.7% 32 32.0 100.0% 49.2%
Nyeri Sedang / Berat 4 5.6 12.1% 6.2% 6 5.6 18.2% 9.2% 7 11.2 21.2% 10.8% 16 10.7 48.5% 24.6% 33 33.0 100.0% 50.8%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
a
3
.023
Likelihood Ratio
9.941
3
.019
Linear-by-Linear
3.496
1
.062
Pearson Chi-Square
9.567
Association N of Valid Cases
65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.42.
Total 11 11.0 16.9% 16.9% 11 11.0 16.9% 16.9% 22 22.0 33.8% 33.8% 21 21.0 32.3% 32.3% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
82
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri
Penyakit Komorbid
Total
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang Tidak ada Count 2 4 Expected 3.0 2.5 Count % within 6.3% 14.8% Nyeri % of Total 3.1% 6.2% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit Count 20 14 komorbid Expected 17.7 15.0 Count % within 62.5% 51.9% Nyeri % of Total 30.8% 21.5% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count 10 9 komorbid Expected 11.3 9.6 Count % within 31.3% 33.3% Nyeri % of Total 15.4% 13.8% Count 32 27 Expected 32.0 27.0 Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Nyeri % of Total 49.2% 41.5%
Berat
Total
0 .6
6 6.0
.0%
9.2%
.0% 2 3.3
9.2% 36 36.0
33.3%
55.4%
3.1% 4 2.1
55.4% 23 23.0
66.7%
35.4%
6.2% 6 6.0
35.4% 65 65.0
100.0%
100.0%
9.2%
100.0%
Nyeri Sedang / Ringan Berat 12 17 14.3 14.7
Total 29 29.0
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 4.500 4.690 .740
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 4 .343 4 .321 1 .390
65
a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .55. Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 Count penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total
37.5% 18.5% 20 17.7
51.5% 26.2% 16 18.3
44.6% 44.6% 36 36.0
62.5% 30.8%
48.5% 24.6%
55.4% 55.4%
83
Total
Count Expected Count % within Nyeri % of Total
Value a 1.291
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction
b
Likelihood Ratio
32 32.0
33 33.0
65 65.0
100.0% 49.2%
100.0% 50.8%
100.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Df (2-sided) 1 .256
.787
1
.375
1.296
1
.255
1.272
1
.259
Exact Sig. (2sided)
Exact Sig. (1sided)
.321
.188
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.28. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri
Aktivitas Fisik
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang Count 3 6 Expected Count 4.4 3.7 % within Nyeri 9.4% 22.2% % of Total 4.6% 9.2% Count 29 21 Expected Count 27.6 23.3 % within Nyeri 90.6% 77.8% % of Total 44.6% 32.3% Count 32 27 Expected Count 32.0 27.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5%
Weight bearing
No Weight bearing Total
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 3.089 3.765 .108
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 2 .213 2 .152 1 .743
65
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .83. Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik Nyeri dimension1
Weight bearing No weight bearing Total
N 9 56 65
Berat
Total
0 .8 .0% .0% 6 5.2 100.0% 9.2% 6 6.0 100.0% 9.2%
9 9.0 13.8% 13.8% 56 56.0 86.2% 86.2% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
84
Test Statistics
a
Nyeri Absolute .185 Positive .185 Negative -.107 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .514 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .954 a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik Most Extreme Differences
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang ya Count 27 19 Expected Count 25.1 21.2 % within Nyeri 84.4% 70.4% % of Total 41.5% 29.2% tidak Count 5 8 Expected Count 6.9 5.8 % within Nyeri 15.6% 29.6% % of Total 7.7% 12.3% Count 32 27 Expected Count 32.0 27.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5%
Riwayat Fisioterapi
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 1.792 1.771 .540 65
df 2 2 1
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) .408 .413 .462
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.29. Frequencies Riwayat Fisioterapi Nyeri dimension1
N
ya tidak Total
51 14 65 a
Test Statistics Most Extreme Differences
Absolute Positive Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Riwayat Fisioterapi
Nyeri .172 .172 -.027 .571 .900
Berat
Total
5 4.7 83.3% 7.7% 1 1.3 16.7% 1.5% 6 6.0 100.0% 9.2%
51 51.0 78.5% 78.5% 14 14.0 21.5% 21.5% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
85
Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang Underweight Count 1 2 Expected Count 1.4 1.2 % within Disabilitas 3.3% 7.4% % of Total 1.5% 3.1% Normal Count 5 1 Expected Count 3.7 3.3 % within Disabilitas 16.7% 3.7% % of Total 7.7% 1.5% Overweight Count 7 3 Expected Count 5.1 4.6 % within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.1% % of Total 10.8% 4.6% Obesitas derajat 1 Count 12 9 Expected Count 10.2 9.1 % within Disabilitas 40.0% 33.3% % of Total 18.5% 13.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 12 Expected Count 9.7 8.7 % within Disabilitas 16.7% 44.4% % of Total 7.7% 18.5% Count 30 27 Expected Count 30.0 27.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5%
Berat
Total
0 .4 .0% .0% 2 1.0 25.0% 3.1% 1 1.4 12.5% 1.5% 1 2.7 12.5% 1.5% 4 2.6 50.0% 6.2% 8 8.0 100.0% 12.3%
3 3.0 4.6% 4.6% 8 8.0 12.3% 12.3% 11 11.0 16.9% 16.9% 22 22.0 33.8% 33.8% 21 21.0 32.3% 32.3% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Sedang / Ringan Berat Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count 6 5 Expected Count 5.1 5.9 % within Disabilitas 20.0% 14.3% % of Total 9.2% 7.7% Overweight Count 7 4 Expected Count 5.1 5.9 % within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.4% % of Total 10.8% 6.2%
Total 11 11.0 16.9% 16.9% 11 11.0 16.9% 16.9%
Kriteria IMT
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 11.119 12.344 1.905
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 8 .195 8 .136 1 .167
65
a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .37.
86
Obesitas derajat 1
Obesitas derajat 2
Total
Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas % of Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas % of Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas % of Total
12 10.2 40.0% 18.5% 5 9.7 16.7% 7.7% 30 30.0 100.0% 46.2%
10 11.8 28.6% 15.4% 16 11.3 45.7% 24.6% 35 35.0 100.0% 53.8%
22 22.0 33.8% 33.8% 21 21.0 32.3% 32.3% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 6.507 6.776 3.844
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 3 .089 3 .079 1 .050
65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.08.
Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas
Penyakit Komorbid
Total
Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang Tidak ada Count 3 2 Expected Count 2.8 2.5 % within 10.0% 7.4% Disabilitas % of Total 4.6% 3.1% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit Count 22 8 komorbid Expected Count 16.6 15.0 % within 73.3% 29.6% Disabilitas % of Total 33.8% 12.3% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count 5 17 komorbid Expected Count 10.6 9.6 % within 16.7% 63.0% Disabilitas % of Total 7.7% 26.2% Count 30 27 Expected Count 30.0 27.0 % within 100.0% 100.0% Disabilitas % of Total 46.2% 41.5%
Berat
Total
1 .7 12.5%
6 6.0 9.2%
1.5% 6 4.4 75.0%
9.2% 36 36.0 55.4%
9.2% 1 2.8 12.5%
55.4% 23 23.0 35.4%
1.5% 35.4% 8 65 8.0 65.0 100.0% 100.0% 12.3% 100.0%
87
Chi-Square Tests Value a 15.702 16.171 1.202
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 4 .003 4 .003 1 .273
65
a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .74. Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Sedang / Ringan Berat Tidak ada / Memiliki 1- Count 12 17 3 penyakit komorbid Expected Count 13.4 15.6 % within 40.0% 48.6% Disabilitas % of Total 18.5% 26.2% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count 18 18 komorbid Expected Count 16.6 19.4 % within 60.0% 51.4% Disabilitas % of Total 27.7% 27.7% Count 30 35 Expected Count 30.0 35.0 % within 100.0% 100.0% Disabilitas % of Total 46.2% 53.8%
Penyakit Komorbid
Total
Value a .480
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio
b
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. df (2-sided) 1 .488
.196
1
.658
.481
1
.488
.473
1
.492
44.6% 36 36.0 55.4% 55.4% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
Exact Sig. (2sided)
Exact Sig. (1sided)
.618
.329
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Total 29 29.0 44.6%
65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.38. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas
Aktivitas Fisik
Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang Weight Count 4 5 bearing Expected Count 4.2 3.7 % within Disabilitas 13.3% 18.5% % of Total 6.2% 7.7%
Berat 0 1.1 .0% .0%
Total 9 9.0 13.8% 13.8%
88
No weight bearing Total
Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas % of Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas % of Total
26 25.8 86.7% 40.0% 30 30.0 100.0% 46.2%
22 23.3 81.5% 33.8% 27 27.0 100.0% 41.5%
8 6.9 100.0% 12.3% 8 8.0 100.0% 12.3%
56 56.0 86.2% 86.2% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
Berat
Total 51 51.0 78.5% 78.5% 14 14.0 21.5% 21.5% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value a 1.786 2.846 .246
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 2 .409 2 .241 1 .620
65
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.11. Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik Disabilitas dimension1
N Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65 a
Test Statistics Most Extreme Differences
Absolute Positive Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Disabilitas .143 .020 -.143 .398 .997
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas
Riwayat Fisioterapi
Total
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang ya Count 24 19 Expected Count 23.5 21.2 % within Disabilitas 80.0% 70.4% % of Total 36.9% 29.2% tidak Count 6 8 Expected Count 6.5 5.8 % within Disabilitas 20.0% 29.6% % of Total 9.2% 12.3% Count 30 27 Expected Count 30.0 27.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5%
8 6.3 100.0% 12.3% 0 1.7 .0% .0% 8 8.0 100.0% 12.3%
89
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 3.284 4.891 .303 65
df 2 2 1
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) .194 .087 .582
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.72.
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri dan Disabilitas Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Kriteria IMT
Underweight
Count
2
1
0
3
1.2
.2
3.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
5.9%
3.7%
.0%
4.6%
% of Total
3.1%
1.5%
.0%
4.6%
Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC % of Total
Overweight
Count
Obesitas derajat 2
1
2
8
3.3
.5
8.0
14.7%
3.7%
50.0%
12.3%
7.7%
1.5%
3.1%
12.3%
8
2
1
11
4.6
.7
11.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
23.5%
7.4%
25.0%
16.9%
% of Total
12.3%
3.1%
1.5%
16.9%
Count
14
8
0
22
11.5
9.1
1.4
22.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
41.2%
29.6%
.0%
33.8%
% of Total
21.5%
12.3%
.0%
33.8%
5
15
1
21
Expected Count
Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total
5 4.2
5.8
Expected Count
Obesitas derajat 1
Total
1.6
Expected Count
Normal
Berat
% of Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC % of Total
11.0
8.7
1.3
21.0
14.7%
55.6%
25.0%
32.3%
7.7% 34
23.1% 27
1.5% 4
32.3% 65
34.0
27.0
4.0
65.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.3%
41.5%
6.2% 100.0%
90
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 19.106 19.504 1.975 65
Df 8 8 1
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) .014 .012 .160
a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .18. Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang/Berat Kriteria IMT
Underweight / Normal
Count
7
Expected Count
Overweight
5.8
5.2
11.0
12.9%
16.9%
% of Total
10.8%
6.2%
16.9%
8
3
11
5.8
5.2
11.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
23.5%
9.7%
16.9%
% of Total
12.3%
4.6%
16.9%
Count
14
8
22
11.5
10.5
22.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
41.2%
25.8%
33.8%
% of Total
21.5%
12.3%
33.8%
Expected Count
Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC % of Total Count
Total
Expected Count
5
16
21
11.0
10.0
21.0
14.7%
51.6%
32.3%
7.7% 34
24.6% 31
32.3% 65
31.0
65.0
34.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC % of Total
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
52.3%
47.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
11
20.6%
Expected Count
Obesitas derajat 2
Total
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC Count
Obesitas derajat 1
4
Value a 10.373 10.765 6.151 65
Df 3 3 1
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) .016 .013 .013
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.25.
91
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Penyakit Komorbid
Total
Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Berat Total Tidak ada Count 3 2 1 6 Expected Count 3.1 2.5 .4 6.0 % within Kriteria 8.8% 7.4% 25.0% 9.2% Skor WOMAC % of Total 4.6% 3.1% 1.5% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 Count 24 10 2 36 penyakit komorbid Expected Count 18.8 15.0 2.2 36.0 % within Kriteria 70.6% 37.0% 50.0% 55.4% Skor WOMAC % of Total 36.9% 15.4% 3.1% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 Count 7 15 1 23 penyakit komorbid Expected Count 12.0 9.6 1.4 23.0 % within Kriteria 20.6% 55.6% 25.0% 35.4% Skor WOMAC % of Total 10.8% 23.1% 1.5% 35.4% Count 34 27 4 65 Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0 % within Kriteria 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Skor WOMAC % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 9.592 9.284 1.596
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 4 .048 4 .054 1 .206
65
a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .37.
92
Penyakit Komorbid
Total
Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Sedang / Ringan Berat Total Tidak ada / Memiliki Count 14 15 29 1-3 penyakit komorbid Expected Count 15.2 13.8 29.0 % within Kriteria Skor 41.2% 48.4% 44.6% WOMAC % of Total 21.5% 23.1% 44.6% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count 20 16 36 komorbid Expected Count 18.8 17.2 36.0 % within Kriteria Skor 58.8% 51.6% 55.4% WOMAC % of Total 30.8% 24.6% 55.4% Count 34 31 65 Expected Count 34.0 31.0 65.0 % within Kriteria Skor 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% WOMAC % of Total 52.3% 47.7% 100.0%
Value a .341
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio
b
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. df (2-sided) 1 .559
.112
1
.738
.341
1
.559
.336
1
.562
Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Exact Sig. (2sided)
Exact Sig. (1sided)
.622
.369
65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.83. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
93
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri dan Disabilitas Aktivitas Fisik * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Berat Aktivitas Fisik Weight Count 4 5 0 bearing Expected Count 4.7 3.7 .6 % within Kriteria Skor 11.8% 18.5% .0% WOMAC % of Total 6.2% 7.7% .0% No Count 30 22 4 weight Expected Count 29.3 23.3 3.4 bearing % within Kriteria Skor 88.2% 81.5% 100.0% WOMAC % of Total 46.2% 33.8% 6.2% Total Count 34 27 4 Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 % within Kriteria Skor 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% WOMAC % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% Chi-Square Tests Value a 1.260 1.776 .008
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 2 .532 2 .412 1 .928
65
a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .55. Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik Kriteria Skor WOMAC dimension1
N Weight bearing 9 No Weight bearing 56 Total 65 a
Test Statistics
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute Positive Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Kriteria Skor WOMAC .091 .091 -.071 .254 1.000
Total 9 9.0 13.8% 13.8% 56 56.0 86.2% 86.2% 65 65.0 100.0% 100.0%
94
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri dan Disabilitas Riwayat Fisioterapi * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Berat Total Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 27 20 4 51 Expected Count 26.7 21.2 3.1 51.0 % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 79.4% 74.1% 100.0% 78.5% % of Total 41.5% 30.8% 6.2% 78.5% tidak Count 7 7 0 14 Expected Count 7.3 5.8 .9 14.0 % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 20.6% 25.9% .0% 21.5% % of Total 10.8% 10.8% .0% 21.5% Total Count 34 27 4 65 Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0 % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value 1.424a 2.253
2 2
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .491 .324
1
.791
df
.070 65
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .86.
Frequencies Fisioterapi Kriteria Skor WOMAC dimension1
N
ya tidak Total
51 14 65 a
Test Statistics
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute Positive Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Fisioterapi
Kriteria Skor WOMAC .078 .029 -.078 .260 1.000
95
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut
Kriteria IMT
Total
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut Crosstabulation Grade OA Lutut Grade Grade Grade Grade 4 3 2 1 Total Underweight Count 0 1 1 1 3 Expected Count .6 .7 .9 .7 3.0 % within Grade OA .0% 6.3% 5.3% 6.3% 4.6% Lutut % of Total .0% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 4.6% Normal Count 0 3 2 3 8 Expected Count 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.0 8.0 % within Grade OA .0% 18.8% 10.5% 18.8% 12.3% Lutut % of Total .0% 4.6% 3.1% 4.6% 12.3% Overweight Count 0 4 4 3 11 Expected Count 2.4 2.7 3.2 2.7 11.0 % within Grade OA .0% 25.0% 21.1% 18.8% 16.9% Lutut % of Total .0% 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 16.9% Obesitas Count 5 5 8 4 22 derajat 1 Expected Count 4.7 5.4 6.4 5.4 22.0 % within Grade OA 35.7% 31.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8% Lutut % of Total 7.7% 7.7% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8% Obesitas Count 9 3 4 5 21 derajat 2 Expected Count 4.5 5.2 6.1 5.2 21.0 % within Grade OA 64.3% 18.8% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3% Lutut % of Total 13.8% 4.6% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3% Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Lutut % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
df
sided)
a
12
.314
17.555
12
.130
4.434
1
.035
13.800
65
a. 14 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .65.
96
Kriteria IMT
Total
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade Grade Grade 3/4 2 1 Total Underweight / Normal / Count 8 7 7 22 Overweight Expected Count 10.2 6.4 5.4 22.0 % within Grade 26.7% 36.8% 43.8% 33.8% OA % of Total 12.3% 10.8% 10.8% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 1 Count 10 8 4 22 Expected Count 10.2 6.4 5.4 22.0 % within Grade 33.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8% OA % of Total 15.4% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count 12 4 5 21 Expected Count 9.7 6.1 5.2 21.0 % within Grade 40.0% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3% OA % of Total 18.5% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3% Count 30 19 16 65 Expected Count 30.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% OA % of Total 46.2% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
a
4
.553
Likelihood Ratio
3.097
4
.542
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.463
1
.227
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
3.026
65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.17.
97
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Lutut
Penyakit Komorbid
Total
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade Grade Grade Grade 4 3 2 1 Total Tidak ada Count 1 1 2 2 6 Expected 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.5 6.0 Count % within 7.1% 6.3% 10.5% 12.5% 9.2% Grade OA % of Total 1.5% 1.5% 3.1% 3.1% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 Count 10 9 10 7 36 penyakit komorbid Expected 7.8 8.9 10.5 8.9 36.0 Count % within 71.4% 56.3% 52.6% 43.8% 55.4% Grade OA % of Total 15.4% 13.8% 15.4% 10.8% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 Count 3 6 7 7 23 penyakit komorbid Expected 5.0 5.7 6.7 5.7 23.0 Count % within 21.4% 37.5% 36.8% 43.8% 35.4% Grade OA % of Total 4.6% 9.2% 10.8% 10.8% 35.4% Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Grade OA % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 2.629 2.715 .379
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 6 .854 6 .844 1 .538
65
a. 5 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.29.
Penyakit Komorbid
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade Grade Grade 4 3 2 Tidak ada / Count 10 5 5 Memiliki 1-3 Expected 6.2 7.1 8.5 penyakit komorbid Count % within 71.4% 31.3% 26.3% Grade OA % of Total 15.4% 7.7% 7.7%
Grade 1 9 7.1
Total 29 29.0
56.3%
44.6%
13.8%
44.6%
98
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Total
Count Expected Count % within Grade OA % of Total Count Expected Count % within Grade OA % of Total
4 7.8
11 8.9
14 10.5
7 8.9
36 36.0
28.6%
68.8%
73.7%
43.8%
55.4%
6.2% 14 14.0
16.9% 16 16.0
21.5% 19 19.0
10.8% 16 16.0
55.4% 65 65.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 21.5%
24.6%
29.2%
24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a 8.681 8.897 .646 65
df 3 3 1
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) .034 .031 .422
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.25.
Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Lutut
Aktivitas Fisik
Weight bearing
No weight bearing
Total
Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Count 2 2 3 Expected Count 1.9 2.2 2.6 % within Grade 14.3% 12.5% 15.8% OA % of Total 3.1% 3.1% 4.6% Count 12 14 16 Expected Count 12.1 13.8 16.4 % within Grade 85.7% 87.5% 84.2% OA % of Total 18.5% 21.5% 24.6% Count 14 16 19 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 % within Grade 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% OA % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a .111 .110 .002
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 3 .990 3 .991 1 .968
65
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.94.
Grade 1 2 2.2 12.5%
Total 9 9.0 13.8%
3.1% 14 13.8 87.5%
13.8% 56 56.0 86.2%
21.5% 16 16.0 100.0%
86.2% 65 65.0 100.0%
24.6%
100.0%
99
Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik Grade OA dimension1
N Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65 a
Test Statistics Most Extreme Differences
Grade OA .028 .020 -.028 .077 1.000
Absolute Positive Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Lutut Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 10 12 16 13 51 Expected Count 11.0 12.6 14.9 12.6 51.0 % within Grade OA 71.4% 75.0% 84.2% 81.3% 78.5% % of Total 15.4% 18.5% 24.6% 20.0% 78.5% tidak Count 4 4 3 3 14 Expected Count 3.0 3.4 4.1 3.4 14.0 % within Grade OA 28.6% 25.0% 15.8% 18.8% 21.5% % of Total 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 4.6% 21.5% Total Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value a .968 .968 .676 65
df 3 3 1
Asymp. Sig. (2sided) .809 .809 .411
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.02. Frequencies Fisioterapi Grade OA Lutut dimension1
ya tidak Total
N 51 14 65
100
a
Test Statistics Most Extreme Differences
Absolute Positive Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Fisioterapi
Grade OA Lutut .140 .000 -.140 .464 .982
101
Lampiran 6. Kuesioner penelitian KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN ANTARA FAKTOR RISIKO OSTEOARTRITIS LUTUT DENGAN NYERI, DISABILITAS, DAN BERAT RINGANNYA OSTEOARTRITIS Tanggal diisi : …. / …. / …. DATA UMUM DATA IDENTITAS PASIEN
KODE
1 No. ID Pasien : ……………………………………………. 2 Nama Pasien : ……………………………………………. 3 Alamat : ………………………………………………….. RT …. RW …. Desa/Kel …………………………………. Kec. ………………….... Kota …………………………… 4 Jenis Kelamin : 1. Pria
2. Wanita
5 Usia : ……………………………………………….. tahun 6 Tinggi Badan : ……………………………………... cm Berat Badan : ……………………………………… kg 7 Status pernikahan : 1. Menikah
2. Belum menikah
3. Duda / Janda
8 Nomer telepon yang dapat dihubungi : …………………..
102
Kuesioner WOMAC untuk pengukuran nyeri dan disabilitas pasien OA lutut 1. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri Tidak pada saat berjalan?
2. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri Tidak pada saat naik tangga?
3. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri Tidak pada malam hari?
4. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri Tidak pada saat beristirahat?
5. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri Tidak pada sendi-sendi?
6. Apakah
Anda
kekakuan sendi
merasakan Tidak pada
pagi
hari? 7. Apakah kekakuan
Anda
merasakan Tidak
sendi
pada
sore/malam hari? 8. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
menuruni tangga?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
9. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
menaiki tangga?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
10. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
Ya, . . . - Sedikit
- Sangat
103
saat berdiri dari duduk? 11. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
berdiri?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
12. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
- Sedikit
- Sangat
saat membungkuk ke lantai?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
13. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
berjalan di permukaan datar?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
14. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
- Sedikit
- Sangat
saat masuk / keluar dari
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
mobil? 15. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
berbelanja?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
16. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
memakai kaos kaki?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
17. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
berbaring di tempat tidur?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
18. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
melepas kaos kaki?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
19. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
- Sedikit
- Sangat
saat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
tidur?
bangun
dari
tempat
104
20. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
mandi?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
21. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
duduk?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
22. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
- Sedikit
- Sangat
ke toilet?
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
23. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
- Sedikit
- Sangat
saat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
melakukan
pekerjaan
rumah tangga yang berat? 24. Apakah
Anda
merasakan Tidak
Ya, . . .
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
- Sedikit
- Sangat
saat
- Sedang
- Amat sangat
melakukan
pekerjaan
rumah tangga yang ringan? Keterangan : Apabila jawaban “ya”, maka sebagai berikut. - Sedikit apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor lebih dari 0 hingga kurang dari 3. - Sedang apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 3 hingga kurang dari 7. - Sangat apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 7 hingga kurang dari 9. - Amat sangat apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 9 hingga 10.
105
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi penelitian
106
Lampiran 8. Biodata mahasiswa
Identitas Nama NIM Tempat/tanggal lahir Jenis kelamin Alamat Nomor Telepon Nomor HP e-mail
: Maya Yanuarty : 22010110110125 : Pekalongan, 20 Januari 1993 : Perempuan : Jl. Kemakmuran no.1J, Pekalongan :: 085642993128 :
[email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal 1. SD : SD Pius Pekalongan 2. SMP : SMP Pius Pekalongan 3. SMA : SMA 1 Pekalongan 4. FK UNDIP
Lulus tahun : 2004 Lulus tahun : 2007 Lulus tahun : 2010 Masuk tahun : 2010
Keanggotaan Organisasi 1. OSIS SMA 1 Pekalongan 2. HIMA KU UNDIP 3. PSM FK UNDIP 3. PRMK FK UNDIP 4. OMK Banyumanik
Tahun 2008 s/d 2010 Tahun 2010 s/d 2011 Tahun 2011 s/d 2013 Tahun 2011 s/d 2013 Tahun 2013 s/d sekarang
Pengalaman penelitian Pengalaman publikasi tulisan ilmiah Pengalaman presentasi karya ilmiah Pengalaman mengikuti lomba karya ilmiah -