Tematické okruhy ke státní magisterské zkoušce Bezpečnostní studia

Tematické okruhy ke státní magisterské zkoušce Bezpečnostní studia LS 2016 (zahájení studia 2014/2015)

Teorie bezpečnosti, konfliktů a strategických studií 1) Konceptualizace bezpečnosti v realistické tradici MV: rovnováha moci, hegemonie, kolektivní obrana 

Jervis, R., 1998. Realism in the Study of World Politics. International Organisation, 52(4), pp. 971-991



Walt, S. M. 1991. Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35, pp. 211-239



Walt, S., M. 1999. Rigor or Rigor Mortis: Rational Choice and Security Studies. International Security 23(4), pp. 5-48



Mearsheimer, J. J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton



Collins, Alan (ed.): Contemporary Security Studies. Oxford University Press, 2007.

2) Konceptualizace bezpečnosti v liberální tradici MV: kolektivní bezpečnost, demokratický mír, bezpečnostní společenství 

Drulák, Petr (2000) Teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Portál



Keohane, Robert O. – Nye Jr., Joseph S.: Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign Affairs, Sept/Oct 1998, Vol. 77, Issue 5, s. 81-94.



Collins, Alan (ed.): Contemporary Security Studies. Oxford University Press, 2007.



Frederking, Brian: Constructing Post-Cold War Collective Security. American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 3, August 2003, s. 363-378.

3) Koncept bezpečnosti a hladiny analýzy 

Waltz, K., 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, Columbia University Press



Emmanuel Adler, Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations, Millennium, 26, 1997



Karl W. Deutsch et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957



Adler, E., Barnett, M. ed. 1998. Security Communities, Cambridge University Press



Spiegel, S., 2003. Regional security and the levels of analysis problem, Journal of Strategic Studies, 26 (3), 75-98

4) Koncept bezpečnosti: rozšiřování a prohlubování konceptu bezpečnosti, sektory bezpečnosti 

Collins, Alan (ed.): Contemporary Security Studies. Oxford University Press, 2007



Krause, K. and Williams, M. 1996. Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods. Mershon International Studies Review, 40, pp. 229-254



Buzan, B., Wæver, O. De Wilde, J. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Publisher, Lynne Rienner Pub.



Kolodziek, A. E. 1992. Renaissance in Security Studies? Caveat lector! International Studies Quarterly 36(4), pp. 421-438

5) Sekuritizace: teorie a praxe sekuritizace 

Buzan, B., Wæver, O. De Wilde, J. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Publisher, Lynne Rienner Pub.



Balzacq, T., 2005. The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 11 no. 2, 171-201



McDonald, M.,2008. Securitisation and the Construction of Security, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, 563-589

6) Sekuritizace: kritické hodnocení konceptu sekuritizace 

Balzacq, T., 2005. The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 11 no. 2, 171-201



McDonald, M.,2008. Securitisation and the Construction of Security, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, 563-58



McSweeney, B. 1999. Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

7) Kritická bezpečnostní studia 

Krause, K. ‘Critical Theory and Security Studies’, Cooperation and Conflict, 1998, Vol.33 (3)



Fierke, M., K., 2007. Critical Approaches to International Security, Polity Press Cambridge, PART I



Krause, K. and Williams, M. 1996. Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods. Mershon International Studies Review, 40, pp. 229-254



Peoples, C., Vaugha-Williams, N. 2010. Critical Security Studies: An Introduction, London: Routledge, chapter I



McSweeney, B. 1999. Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press



Ken Booth (ed). 2005. Critical Security Studies Series. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner (Chapters 1, 9, 11).



Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams, 1997. Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Dilemmas, Routledge (Preface, Chapters 1 and 2)

8) Lidská bezpečnost: dějiny humanitarianismu a bezpečnostně-politickoekonomický nexus 

Hynek, Nik (2010): "Rethinking Human Security: History, Economy, Governmentality". In: Chandler, David and Hynek, Nik (eds.): Critical Approaches to Human Security: Rethinking Emancipation and Power in International Relations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 157-171.



Foucault, Michel (2010): The Birth of Biopolitics. London: Picador.

9) Lidská bezpečnost: liberální východiska lidské bezpečnosti a význam lidské bezpečnosti po konci studené války 

Axworthy, Lloyd. 2001. "Human Security and Global Governance: Putting People First," Global Governance 7 (2001), pp. 19-23.



Hampson, Fen O. et all. 2002. Human Security and World Disorder. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (Chapter 1: "Introduction: Madness in Multitude," pp. 1-13

10)

Lidská bezpečnost: kritické hodnocení 

Chandler, David and Hynek, Nik (eds.): Critical Approaches to Human Security: Rethinking Emancipation and Power in International Relations. London and New York: Routledge



Hynek, Nik and Chandler, David (2013): "No Emancipatory Alternative, No Critical Security Studies". Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5471

11)

Humanitární intervence a doktrína zodpovědnosti chránit:

charakteristika a vývoj konceptu, klíčová dilemata 

Holzgrefe, J. L., Keohane, O. R., 2003. Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press



Sarooshi, D., 2002. Humanitarian Intervention After Kosovo: Emergent Norm, Moral Duty or the Coming Anarchy?, International Affairs 77 (1), 113-128



Knight, W. Andy. The Responsibility to Protect as an Evolving International Norm. Global Responsibility to Protect (3) 2011. p. 3–36



Chandler, David. 2004. "The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the 'Liberal Peace'", International Peacekeeping 11(1), pp. 59-81

12)

Definice konfliktu, konfliktní cyklus, vysvětlení vzniku a průběhu

konfliktu (Ozbrojené konflikty a mezinárodní bezpečnost) 

Nye, Joseph S.: Understanding International Conflicts: Introduction into Theory and History. Harper Collins, 1993.



Waisová, Šárka: Řešení konfliktů v mezinárodních vztazích. Portál, 2005



Wallensteen, Peter: Understanding Conflict Resolution. War, Peace and the Global System. SAGE Publications, 2002.

13)

Konceptualizace moderního válčení: "staré" a "nové" války, generace

válčení, postmoderní válka, asymetrická válka; virtuous or virtual war 

Coker, Christopher, 2004. The future of war: the re-enchantment of war in the twenty first Century, Blackwell manifestos. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK



Coker, Christopher, 2004. Asymmetrical War, Institutt for Forsvarsstudier, Oslo



Der Derian, J., 2000. Virtuous War/Virtual Theory, International Affairs, 76/4



Stone, John, 2004. Politics, Technology and the Revolution in Military Affairs, Journal of Strategic Studies 27 (3)



Echevarria, A., J., Fourth-Generation War and other Myths, Strategic Studies Institute, http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub632.pdf

14)

Klasické koncepce války: Sun C‘, Clausewitz 

Sun Tzu (1993) The Art of War. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 100-134.



Clausewitz, Carl von (2005) What is War? In: Diehl, Paul F., ed., War, vol. I. London: Sage, 25-40.



Clausewitz, Carl von (1959) O válce. Praha: Naše vojsko, 1959.



Herberg-Rothe, Andreas (2007) Clausewitz‘s Puzzle. The Political Theory of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2-87.

15)

Strategická studia: vývoj, role, cíle, definice strategie 

Gray.C.S. Modern Strategy, Oxford 1999



Baylis, John et al (2002/2007) Strategy in the Contemporary World. Oxford University Press



Paret P., Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age, Princeton 1986



Terry Terriff, Stuart Croft, Lucy James, Patrick M. Morgan, Security Studies Today, Cambridge1999



16)

Brzezinski Zbigniew, Velká šachovnice, Praha 1999

Strategická studia: principy odstrašování v průběhu a po skončení

studené války 




Paret P., Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age, Princeton 1986



Baylis, John et al (2002/2007) Strategy in the Contemporary World. Oxford University Press



Freedman, Lawrence (2004) Deterrence. Polity Press



Jervis, Robert (1989) Rational Deterrence: Theory and Evidence, World Politics, 41, 2

Soudobé bezpečnostní hrozby

1) Terorismus: debata o definici a kořenech terorismu 

Crenshaw, Martha. “Terrorism and Global Security.” In Leasing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 67-81. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2007.



Ganor, Boaz. "Terror as a Strategy of Psychological Warfare." 07/15 2002. International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism.



Nicholson, Marc. "An Essay on Terrorism." American Diplomacy, 19/08 2003.



Post, Jerrold M., Ehud Sprinzak, and Laurita M. Denny. "The Terrorists in Their Own Words: Interviews with 35 Incarcerated Middle Eastern Terrorists." Terrorism & Political Violence 15, no. 1 (Spring 2003): 171-85.



Freeman, Michael. Democracy, Al Qaeda, and the Causes of Terrorism: A Strategic Analysis of U.S. Policy. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 31(1), 2008: 40-59.

2) Terorismus: "starý" a "nový" terorismus, teorie vln, proměny terorismu 

Crenshaw, Martha. "'New' Vs. 'Old' Terrorism: A Critical Appraisal." In Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalization Challenge in Europe, edited by Rik Coolsaet, 25-36. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2008.



Gregg, Heather S. "Fighting the Jihad of the Pen: Countering Revolutionary Islam's Ideology." Terrorism and Political Violence 22, no. 2 (2010): 292-314.



Gunaratna, Rohan & Aviv Oreg. “Al Qaeda's Organizational Structure and its Evolution.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33, no. 12 (2010): 1043-1078.



Weinberg, Leonard & William Eubank. "An End to the Fourth Wave of Terrorism?” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33, no. 7 (2010): 594-602.

3) Terorismus: Al-Kaida jako představitel nového typu terorismu 

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. The 9/11 Commission Report. 2004. ONLY Chapter 2: The Foundation of New Terror (p. 47-70 of the actual report = p.64-87 in the on-line entire report .pdf file), URL: http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch2.pdf. (Accessed 9/2/2006)



Gregg, Heather S. "Fighting the Jihad of the Pen: Countering Revolutionary Islam's Ideology." Terrorism and Political Violence 22, no. 2 (2010): 292-314.



Hoffman, Bruce. "Al-Qaeda’s Uncertain Future." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36, no. 8 (2013): 635-653.



Gunaratna, Rohan & Aviv Oreg. “Al Qaeda's Organizational Structure and its Evolution.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33, no. 12 (2010): 1043-1078.

4) Proliferace zbraní hromadného ničení: význam, teoretická diskuze, deterence, protiproliferační opatření 

John Mueller, The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons: Stability in the Postwar World, International Security, 13/2, 1988



Nina Tannenwald, Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo, International Security, 29/4, Spring 2005



Alex H. Montgomery, Ringing in Proliferation: How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb Network, International Security, 30/2, Fall 2005



Chaim Braun, Christopher F. Chyba, Proliferation Rings: New Challenges to the Nuclear nonproliferation Regime, International Security, 29/2, Fall 2004



William Walker, Nuclear Order and Disorder, International Affairs, 76:4, 2000



Scott Sagan, Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb, International Security, 21, Winter 1996/1997

5) Ozbrojené konflikty: přístupy k jejich klasifikaci a analýze 

Dick, C. J.: The Future of Conflict: Looking Out to 2020. Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, 2003.



Eriksson, Mikael – Wallensteen, Peter: Armed Conflict, 1989-2003. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 41, no. 5, 2004, s. 625-636.



Gleditsch, Nils Petter et al: Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 39, No. 5 (Sep., 2002), s. 615-637.



Nye, Joseph S.: Understanding International Conflicts: Introduction into Theory and History. Harper Collins, 1993.









Harvey, Frank P. (ed.): Conflict in World Politics: Advances in the Study of Crisis, War and Peace. Macmillan, 1998.

6) Mezistátní ozbrojené konflikty po skončení studené války: příklady; vývojové tendence, předmět sporu; způsoby řešení 

Correlates of War, www.correlatesofwar.org












Uppsala Conflict Data Program, www.ucdp.uu.se




7) Vnitrostátní ozbrojené konflikty o moc po skončení studené války: podstata, možnosti řešení, otázka demokratizace, insecurity dilemma a nefunkční státy 














8) Vnitrostátní ozbrojené konflikty o území po skončení studené války: problematika diskriminace, autonomie, federalizace a nezávislost jako možnosti řešení 














9) Konfliktní komplex: vymezení, postupy a institucionální rámce při jejich řešení, role velmocí 

Buzan, Barry - Waever, Ole – de Wilde, Jaap: Bezpečnost: nový rámec pro analýzu. Brno: Centrum strategických studií, 2005.




10)

Současná bezpečnostní situace v oblasti Blízkého Východu (aktéři,

problémy, konflikty) 

Carpenter, T. (2013): Tangled Web: The Syrian Civil War and Its Implications, Mediterranean Quarterly, 24 (1), pp 1 – 11.



Denoeux, G. (2011): The Forgotten Swamp: Navigating Political Islam. In Volpi, F. (ed. 2011): Political Islam: A Critical Reader, New York, Routledge.



Hinnebusch, R. (2002): Introduction: The Analytical Framework. In Hinnebusch, R. - Ehteshami, A (eds. 2002): The Foreign Policies of Middle East States, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.



Jones, C. - Milton-Edwards, B. (2013): Missing the ‘devils’ we knew? Israel and political Islam amid the Arab Awakening. International Affairs, 89 (2), pp 399 – 415.



Roy, O. (2012): The Transformation of The Arab World. Journal of Democracy, 22 (3), pp 5 – 18.



Najem, T. (2012): Lebanon: The Politics of Penetrated Society, New York, Routledge. Chapter 5: Post-war foreign policy: Syrian penetration and Lebanese interests, pp. 99 – 121.



Waltz, K. N. (2012): Why Iran Should Get the Bomb. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 91, No. 4.

11)

Současná bezpečnostní situace v subsaharské Africe (aktéři, problémy,

konflikty) (Regionální aspekty mezinárodní bezpečnosti, Lidská bezpečnost) 

Abrahamsen, R. - Williams, M. C. (2011): Security Beyond the State: Private Security in International Politics, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp 122 – 148.



Boege, V. et al. (2009): On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: What is Failing – States in the Gobal South or Research and Politics in the West? In Fischer, M. - Schmelze, B. (eds. 2009): Building Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure, Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Creative Conflict Management, pp 15 – 35.



Dua, J. - Menkhaus, K. (2012): The Context of Contemporary Piracy: The Case of Somalia. Journal of International Criminal Justice,10 (4), pp 749 – 766.



Francis, D. (2013): The regional impact of the armed conflict and French intervention in Mali. Noref Report Series.

12)

Současná bezpečnostní situace v postsovětském prostoru (aktéři,

problémy, konflikty) (Teorie a praxe bezpečnosti, Regionální aspekty mezinárodní bezpečnosti) 

Jackson, N. (2010): The role of external factors in advancing non-liberal democratic forms of political rule: a case study of Russia's influence on Central Asian regimes. Contemporary Politics, 16 (1), pp 101-118.



MacFarlane, N. (2009): Frozen Conflicts in the Former Soviet Union – The Case of Georgia/South Ossetia. In OSCE (ed. 2009): OSCE Yearbook 2008, pp 23-33.



Sanchez, W. A. (2009): The 'Frozen' Southeast: How the Moldova-Transnistria Question has Become a European Geo-Security Issue. The Journal of Slavic Military Affairs, 22 (2), pp 153-176.



Souleimanov, E. (2011): The Caucasus Emirate: Genealogy of an Islamist Insurgency. Middle East Policy, 18 (4), pp 155-168.



Tsygankov, A. P. (2003): Mastering Space in Eurasia: Russia’s Geopolitical Thinking after the Soviet Break-up. Communist and PostCommunist Studies 36 (1), pp 101-127.

13)

Současná bezpečnostní situace v oblasti jižní Asie (aktéři, problémy,

konflikty) (Regionální aspekty mezinárodní bezpečnosti) 

Basu, I. (2011): Security and development – are they two sides of the same coin? Investigating India's two-pronged policy towards left wing extremism. Contemporary South Asia, Dec2011, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p373-393.



Bhatnagar, A. et al. (2012): The Naxal Problem: Understanding the Issues, Challenges and Alternative Approaches. IPCS Conference Report, March 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.



Dasgupta, S. (2013): Regional Politics and the Prospects for Stability in Afghanistan. Peaceworks No. 86, United States Institute for Peace.



Miller, M. Ch. (2013): India’s Feeble Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs, May/June 2013, Vol. 92, No. 3.



Pakistan: Countering Militancy in PATA (2013) Asia Report No. 242, 15 January 2013, International Crisis Group.



Pakistan’s Relations with India: Beyond Kashmir? (2012) Asia Report No. 224, 3 May 2012, International Crisis Group.

14)

Současná bezpečnostní situace v oblasti Dálného Východu (aktéři,

problémy, konflikty) (Regionální aspekty mezinárodní bezpečnosti) 

Bernkopf Tucker, N. – Glaser, B. (2011): Should the United States Abandon Taiwan? The Washington Quarterly, 34/3, Autumn 2011, pp 23-37.



Bisley, N. (2012): China's Rise and the Making of East Asia's Security Architecture. Journal of Contemporary China, Jan 2012, Vol. 21 Issue 73, p1934.



Dangerous Waters: China-Japan Relations on the Rocks (2013) Asia Report No. 245, 8 April 2013, International Crisis Group.



Jisi, W. (2011): China’s Search for a Grand Strategy: A Rising Great Power Finds Its Way. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 2.



Park, G. (2011): A New Kind of Korea: Building Trust Between Seoul and Pyongyang. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 5.



Stirring Up the South China Sea (I) (2012) Asia Report No. 223, 23 April 2012, International Crisis Group.



Stirring Up the South China Sea (II): Regional Responses (2012) Asia Report No. 229, 24 July 2012, International Crisis Group.

15)

Humanitární intervence: praxe v mezinárodní politice 

Dembinski, Mathias. Reinold, Theresa. Libya and the Future of Responsibility to Protect. Frankfurt am Main: PRIF 2011



Greenwood, C., 2002. Humanitarian Intervention: the Case in Kosovo, Finnish yearbook of international law. Helsinki, Finland: Kluwer Law, available at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21492/1/Humanitarian_intervention_the_case_of_Koso vo(LSERO).pdf



Holzgrefe, J. L., Keohane, O. R., 2003. Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press



Sarooshi, D., 2002. Humanitarian Intervention After Kosovo: Emergent Norm, Moral Duty or the Coming Anarchy?, International Affairs 77 (1), 113-128



Knight, W. Andy. The Responsibility to Protect as an Evolving International Norm. Global Responsibility to Protect (3) 2011. p. 3–36.

16)

COIN: protipovstalecký boj jako asymetrická strategie 

Theo Farrell, T., Gordon, S., 2009. COIN Machine: The British Military in Afghanistan, Orbis, Volume 53, Issue 4



Chin, W., 2007. British Counter-insurgency in Afghanistan, Defency and Security Analysis, 23 (2), 201-225



Burton, B., Nagl, J., 2008. Learning as we go: the US army adapts to counterinsurgency in Iraq, July 2004–December 2006, Small Wars and Insurgencies 19 (3), 303-327



Coker, Christopher, 2004. Asymmetrical War, Institutt for Forsvarsstudier, Oslo

17)

Bezpečnostní politika ČR: Hlavní bezpečnostní hrozby a rizika ČR,

ochrana kritické infrastruktury 

Balabán, Miloš et al. (2007) Kapitoly o bezpečnosti, Karolinum



Gnessotto, Nicole et al (2006) The New Global Puzzle. What World for the EU in 2025. European Union Institute for Security Studies. Paris

Bezpečnostní a obranná politika

1) Protiteroristická politika EU: kriminální model protiteroristické politiky 

Bureš, Oldřich. EU Counterterrorism Policy: A Paper Tiger? (Burlington, USA: Ashgate, 2011).



Guild, Elspeth. "The Uses and Abuses of Counter-Terrorism Policies in Europe: The Case of the ‘Terrorist Lists’." Journal of Common Market Studies 46, no. 1 (January 2008): 173-93.



Jiri Vlastnik, "Eurojust - A Cornerstone of the Federal Criminal Justice System in the EU?" in Security Versus Justice: Police and Judicial Cooperation in the European Union, ed. Elsepeth Guikd and Florian Geyer (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2008), 35-49.



Bossong, Raphael. The EU's Mature Counterterrorism Policy – A Critical Historical and Functional Assessment, LSE Challenge Working Paper. June 2008,

21.11.2008

http://www2.lse.ac.uk/internationalRelations/centresandunits/EFPU/EFPUpdfs /EFPUchallengewp9.pdf, pages 10-26 ONLY. 

Dalgaard-Nielsen, Anja. “Violent Radicalization in Europe: What We Know and What We Do Not Know.“ Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 33 Issue 9, 2010: 797-815.



Dalgaard-Nielsen, Anja. “Promoting Exit from Violent Extremism: Themes and Approaches.“ Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 36 Issue 2, 2013: 99115.



Huband, Mark. "Europe’s "Home-Grown" Terrorism Threat." The NYU Review of Law & Security No. Special Issue Summer 2005: 22-24. http://www.lawandsecurity.org/Portals/0/Documents/special-issueeurope_000.pdf Accessed 1.4.2008.



Roy, Olivier. ""Euro-Muslims" in Context." The NYU Review of Law & Security

No.

Special

Issue

Summer

2005:

http://www.lawandsecurity.org/Portals/0/Documents/special-issueeurope_000.pdf Accessed 1.4.2008.

20-21.

2) Protiteroristická politika USA: válečný model protiteroristické politiky 

Kurtulus,

Ersun

N.

“The

New

Counterterrorism:

Contemporary

Counterterrorism Trends in the United States and Israel.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 35 Issue 1, Jan. 2012: 37-58. 

Shapiro,

Jeremy,

and

Daniel

Byman.

"Bridging

the

Transatlantic

Counterterrorism Gap." The Washington Quarterly 29, no. 4 (Autumn 2006): 33-50. 

Stevenson, Jonathan. "How Europe and America Defend Themselves," Foreign Affairs 82, no. 2 (March/April 2003): 75-91.



National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. The 9/11 Commission Report. 2004.



Hoffman, Bruce. A First Draft of the History of America’s Ongoing Wars on Terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 38:1 (2015), 75-83.



McIntosh, Christopher. Counterterrorism as War: Identifying the Dangers, Risks, and Opportunity Costs of U.S. Strategy Toward Al Qaeda and Its Affiliates. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 38 Issue 1, 2015: 23-38.



Kathleen Bouzis Countering the Islamic State: U.S. Counterterrorism Measures. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 38(10), 2015: 885-897.

3) Transatlantická obranná integrace: vývoj během studené války 

Lundestad, Geir. 2003. The United States and Western Europe since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.



Kaplan, Lawrence. 2004. NATO Divided, NATO United: The Evolution of an Alliance. London: Praeger.



Aybett, Gülnur, 2001. The Dynamics of European Security Cooperation, 194591. Lomdon and NewYork: Palgrave



Lindley-French, J.: A Chronology of European Security and Defence, 19452007. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

4) NATO: vývoj po konci studené války 

Behnke, Andreas. 2013. NATO’s Security Discourse after the Cold War. London: Routledge.



Herd, Graeme and Hohn Kriendler, eds. 2013. Understanding NATO in the 21st Century: Alliance Strategies, Security and Global Governance. London: Routledge.



Calla, B., R., NATO's Persistence after the Cold War, International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Summer, 1996), pp. 445-475



Duffield, S., J. 1994-95. NATO’s Functions after the Cold War, Political Science Quarterly 109 (5)



Wallander, C., 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War, Council on Foreign Relations



Mearsheimer, J. 1990 Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, Vol. 15, No. 1. (Summer, 1990), s. 5-56

5) Obranná a bezpečnostní integrace EU 

Uçarer, Emek. 2009. Justice and Home Affairs. Michalle Cini and Nieves Pérez- Solórzano Borragán (eds.), European Union Politics. Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.



Lindley-French, Julian: In the shade of Locarno? Why European defence is failing. International Affairs, Oct. 2002, Vol. 78, Issue 4, s. 789-811.



Smith, Michael E. (2004): Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy. The Institutionalization of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.



Winn, Neil (2003): Towards a Common European Security and Defence Policy? The Debate on NATO, the European Army and Transatlantic Security. European Security, Summer 2003, s. 47 - 68.

6) Současná transformace NATO: Lisabonský summit a poté 

NATO Strategic Concept 2010



Ringsmose, S., Rynning, S., 2011. NATO’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment, Danish Institute of International Studies Report 2/2011,

http://subweb.diis.dk/graphics/publications/reports2011/rp2011-02-

nato_web.pdf 

Rasmussen, F., A. 2011. NATO after Libya: The Atlantic Alliance in Austere Times, Foreign Affairs 90 (2)



Noetzel, T., Schreer, B. 2012. More flexible, less coherent: NATO after Lisbon, Australian Journal of International Affairs 66 (1), 20-33

7) Přístup OSN k lidské bezpečnosti 

United Nations Development Program. 1994. Human Development Report. New York: UN Press (Chapter 2: "New Dimensions of Human Security," pp. 22-46



Annan, Kofi. 1999. "Two Concepts of Sovereignty," The Economist (September 18, 1999), http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/kaecon.html



International Commission of Intervention and State Sovereignty. 2001. The Responsibility to Protect: A Report by the International Commission of Intervention and State Sovereignty (December 2001).



Evans, Gareth. 2006. "From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect", Wisconsin International Law Journal 24(3), pp. 703-722.

8) Národní přístupy k lidské bezpečnosti 

Suhrke, Astri (1999): “Human Security and the Interests of States” Security Dialogue 30(3): 265-276.



Foreign Affairs Canada "Freedom from Fear: Canada's Foreign Policy for Human Security," Ottawa, 2004 (an updated 2000 version)



Hynek, Nik and David Bosold (2009): "A History and Genealogy of the Freedom-from-Fear Doctrine." International Journal Vol. 64, No. 3 (Summer 2009), pp. 143-158



Hynek, Nik (2008): "Japanese Human Security: A Conceptual and Institutional Analysis." Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, Vol. 7, pp, 120. ISSN 1347-8214



Hynek, Nik (2012): “Domopolitics of Japanese Human Security”, Security Dialogue 43(2): 119-137.



Sucharithanarugse, Wishaya. 2000. "The Concept of ´Human Security´ Extended: ´Asianizing´ the Paradigm." In Tow, William T., Ramesh Thakur and In-Taek Hyun (eds): Asia’s Emerging Regional Order: Reconciling Traditional and Human Security, pp. 49-61. Tokyo, New York and Paris: UN University Press

9) Prevence konfliktů (definice, nástroje, aktéři) (Ozbrojené konflikty a mezinárodní bezpečnost) 

Crocker, Chester A. – Hampson, Fen Osler – Aall, Pamela (eds.): Turbulent Peace. The Challenges of Managing International Conflict. United States Institute of Peace, 2001.









Zartmann, I. William – Rasmussen, J. Lewis (eds.): Peacemaking in International Conflict. Methods  Techniques. USIP Press, 1999.

10)

Postkonfliktní rekonstrukce (vymezení, aktéři, fáze, složky) 










Zartmann, I. William – Rasmussen, J. Lewis (eds.): Peacemaking in International Conflict. Methods  Techniques. USIP Press, 1999.

11)

Mírové nástroje řešení konfliktů (kategorie a příklady, způsoby

použití, kritické zhodnocení) 

Vayrynen, Raimo: New Directions in Conflict Theory: Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation. Sage, 1991.







12)

Dynamika závodů ve zbrojení, kontrola zbrojení, odzbrojování 




Plechanovová, Běla, Fidler, Jiří (1998) Kapitoly z dějin mezinárodních vztahů II, Praha (kapitoly o jaderním soupeření a odzbrojování



Goldblat, Jozef (2002) Arms control : the new guide to negotiations and agreements, London: Sage



Don Ward Michael (1984) Differential Path to Parity: A Study of the Contemporary Arms Race. The American Political Science Review



Clair Smith Theresa (1980) Arms Race Instability and War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24, 2

13)

Koncepce bezpečnostní politiky ČR v rámci EU a NATO (Bezpečnostní

politika ČR) 

Balabán, Miloš et al. (2007) Kapitoly o bezpečnosti, Karolinum



Klíčové české bezpečnostní dokumenty (viz sylabus)

Tematické okruhy ke státní magisterské zkoušce Bezpečnostní studia

Recommend Documents