Lampiran 3c.
FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI PROPOSAL PENELITIAN TIM PASCASARJANA Judul Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ...........................................................................................................: Perguruan Tinggi : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .............................................................. Anggota Peneliti : ........... orang Jumlah Mhs Pascasarjana : S2 = .......... orang; S3 = ........... orang Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : .............. tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari Instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No 1
2
3
4.
Kriteria Penilaian Keutuhan dan keterpaduan program penelitian : a. Road map, b. Sistematika penelitian, c. Lintas disiplin Integrasi penelitian dengan pendidikan pascasarjana : a. Jumlah bimbingan mhs pascasarjana yang dilibatkan, b. Keterlibatan tim peneliti dalam bimbingan mahasiswa Mutu penelitian : a. Kemutakhiran, b. Inovasi, c. Metode penelitian Kelayakan : a. Biaya, b. Peralatan, c. Track record tim peneliti, d. Potensi tercapainya luaran Jumlah
Bobot (%)
Skor
Nilai
25
20
30
25 100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3d.
FORMULIR PEMAPARAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN TIM PASCASARJANA Judul Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ...........................................................................................................: Perguruan Tinggi : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .............................................................. Anggota Peneliti : ........... orang Jumlah Mhs Pascasarjana : S2 = .......... orang; S3 = ........... orang Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : .............. tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari Instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No 1 2
3
4
5
Kriteria Penilaian Kemampuan presentasi dan penguasaan materi Keutuhan dan keterpaduan program penelitian : a. Road map, b. Sistematika penelitian Integrasi penelitian dengan pendidikan pascasarjana : a. Keterlibatan tim peneliti dalam pembimbingan dan jumlah mahasiswa pascasarjana yang dilibatkan b. Keterkaitan dan integrasi antara rencana penelitian dengan tugas akhir mahasiswa pascasarjana Mutu penelitian : a. Kemutakhiran, b. Tinjauan pustaka, c. Inovasi, d. Kesesuaian / ketepatan metode penelitian Kelayakan : a. Biaya, b. Sarana dan prasarana, c. Track record tim peneliti, d. Potensi tercapainya luaran (publikasi, thesis/desertasi) Jumlah
Bobot (%) 10 15
20
25
30 100
Skor
Nilai
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3e.
FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI PROPOSAL PENELITIAN FUNDAMENTAL Judul Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Perguruan Tinggi : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b. NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .............................................................. Anggota Peneliti : ........... orang Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : ............. tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No
1.
2.
3.
4.
Kriteria Penilaian Masalah yang Diteliti : a. Kontribusi pada Ipteks-Sosbud b. Tinjauan pustaka c. Perumusan masalah Orientasi Penelitian : a. Makna Ilmiah b. Orisinalitas c. Kemutakhiran Metode Penelitian : a. Pola pendekatan ilmiah b. Kesesuaian metode Luaran Penelitian : a. Publikasi ilmiah b. Teori/hipotesis baru c. Metode baru d. Informasi/desain baru
Bobot (%)
15
30
15
30
Skor
Nilai
5.
Kelayakan Sumber Daya : a. Peneliti b. Peralatan c. Rencana jadwal d. Rencana biaya Jumlah
10
100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3f.
FORMULIR PEMAPARAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN FUNDAMENTAL Judul Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Perguruan Tinggi : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .............................................................. Anggota Peneliti : ........... orang Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : ............. tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No 1. 2.
3.
4.
Kriteria Penilaian Kemampuan presentasi dan penguasaan materi Masalah yang Diteliti : a. Kontribusi pada Ipteks-Sosbud b. Tinjauan pustaka c. Perumusan masalah Mutu Penelitian a. Makna Ilmiah b. Orisinalitas c. Kemutakhiran d. Pola pendekatan dan kesesuaian metode Potensi Tercapainya Luaran Penelitian : a. Publikasi ilmiah b. Teori/hipotesis baru c. Metode baru d. Informasi/desain baru
Bobot (%) 10 20
30
30
Skor
Nilai
5.
Kelayakan Sumber Daya: a. Track record tim peneliti b. Sarana dan prasarana c. Rencana jadwal penelitian d. Rencana usulan biaya Jumlah
10
100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3g.
FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI PROPOSAL PENELITIAN HIBAH BERSAING Judul Penelitian/ : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Perguruan Tinggi : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .............................................................. Anggota Peneliti : ........... orang Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : ................. tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No 1
2
3 4
5
Kriteria Penilaian Perumusan masalah : a. Ketajaman perumusan masalah b. Tujuan Penelitian Luaran Penelitian (Proses & Produk): a. Pengembangan Ipteks-Sosbud b. Menunjang pembangunan c. Pengembangan institusi Tinjauan pustaka : a. Relevansi dan kemutakhiran b. Kemajuan dan studi pendahuluan Metode Penelitian : Desain dan ketepatan metode penelitian Kelayakan : a. Jadwal penelitian b. Tim peneliti c. Rencana Biaya d. Sarana dan prasarana Jumlah
Bobot (%)
Skor
Nilai
15
35
15 20
15
100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3h.
FORMULIR PEMAPARAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN HIBAH BERSAING Judul Penelitian/ : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Perguruan Tinggi : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .............................................................. Anggota Peneliti : ........... orang Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : ................. tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No 1.
2.
3.
4.
Kriteria Penilaian Kemampuan presentasi dan penguasaan materi Perumusan masalah : a. Ketajaman perumusan masalah b. Tujuan Penelitian c. Kontribusi pada pembangunan dan pengembangan Ipteks-Sosbud Mutu Penelitian : a. Relevansi dan kemutakhiran pustaka b. Roadmap penelitian c. Desain dan ketepatan metode d. Inovasi baru Potensi Tercapainya Luaran Penelitian : a. Produk Ipteks-Sosbud (metode, TTG, blue print, prototipe, kebijakan, model, rekayasa sosial) b. Publikasi ilmiah, HKI, dll.
Bobot (%) 10
20
25
35
Skor
Nilai
5
Kelayakan : a. Jadwal penelitian b. Tim peneliti c. Rencana Biaya d. Sarana dan prasarana Jumlah
10
100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3i.
FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI PROPOSAL PENELITIAN KERJASAMA ANTAR PERGURUAN TINGGI Judul Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Perguruan Tinggi TPP : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua TPP a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : ................................................................................... Ketua TPM a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b. Perg. Tinggi TPM : .............................................................................................................. b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .................................................................................... Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : ........... tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No 1 2 3
Kriteria Penilaian Kesesuaian program penelitian dengan kompetensi dan bidang keahlian pengusul Pentingnya kerjasama penelitian Track record TPM a. Kesesuaian keahlian b. Prestasi penelitian dan Publikasi, HKI, Kerjasama
Bobot (%)
Nilai
15 20 25
4
Mutu penelitian (tujuan, metode, dan luaran)
20
5
Kelayakan penelitian a. Keberlanjutan penelitian di TPP b. Rencana biaya c. Perencanaan/alokasi waktu kerja sama
20
Jumlah
Skor
100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3j.
FORMULIR PEMAPARAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN KERJASAMA ANTAR PERGURUAN TINGGI Judul Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Bidang Penelitian : ............................................................................................................ Perguruan Tinggi TPP : ............................................................................................................ Fakultas / Jurusan : ............................................................................................................ Ketua TPP a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : ................................................................................... Ketua TPM a. Nama Lengkap : .................................................................................... b. Perg. Tinggi TPM : .............................................................................................................. b.NIDN : ....................................... c. Jabatan Fungsional : .................................................................................... Lama Penelitian Keseluruhan : ........... tahun Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1 a. Diusulkan ke Dikti : Rp. ...................... b. Direkomendasikan : Rp. ...................... c. Dana dari instansi lain : Rp. ...................... / in kind : .................................................. No 1 2 3
4
5
Kriteria Penilaian Kemampuan presentasi dan penguasaan materi Pentingnya kerjasama penelitian : a. Penguaasaan ipteks dan metode penelitian b. Sarana dan prasarana penelitian Mutu penelitian : a. Relevansi dan kemutakhiran program b. Ketepatan desain dan metode penelitian Potensi tercapainya luaran penelitian : a. Publikasi b. Peningkatan kerjasama penelitian c. Peningkatan kemampuan peneliti TPP Kelayakan penelitian a. Keberlanjutan penelitian di TPP b. Rencana biaya c. Perencanaan/alokasi waktu kerja sama
Bobot (%) 10 25 25
25
15
Skor
Nilai
100
Jumlah
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3k.
FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI PROPOSAL PENELITIAN DISERTASI DOKTOR Judul Penelitian Judul Disertasi Perguruan Tinggi Asal Fakultas / Jurusan Perg. Tinggi Penyelenggara Program Doktor Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap b.NIDN c. Jabatan Fungsional Nama Promotor Biaya yang Diusulkan Biaya yang Direkomendasikan No 1
2
3
4 5
: ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ............................................................................. : .................................................. : ............................................................................. : ...................................................................................................... : Rp. ...................... : Rp. ......................
Kriteria Penilaian Relevansi topik penelitian dengan judul disertasi Kualitas penelitian : a. Orisinalitas b. Novelty c. Kontribusi pada Ipteks-Sosbud d. Metode penelitian Luaran penelitian : a. Publikasi internasional b. Disertasi / draft disertasi yang telah disetuji pembimbing Kelayakan penelitian a. Jadwal penelitian b. Kesesuaian rencana biaya c. Sarana dan prasarana penelitian Potensi percepatan penyelesaian studi doktor Jumlah
Bobot (%)
Skor
Nilai
20
25
25
15 15 100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
Lampiran 3l.
FORMULIR PEMAPARAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN DISERTASI DOKTOR Judul Penelitian Judul Disertasi Perguruan Tinggi Asal Fakultas / Jurusan Perg. Tinggi Penyelenggara Program Doktor Ketua Peneliti a. Nama Lengkap b.NIDN c. Jabatan Fungsional Nama Promotor Biaya yang Diusulkan Biaya yang Direkomendasikan No 1
2
3
4
: ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ...................................................................................................... : ............................................................................. : .................................................. : ............................................................................. : ...................................................................................................... : Rp. ...................... : Rp. ......................
Kriteria Penilaian Kemampuan presentasi dan penguasaan materi Kualitas penelitian : a. Kedalaman substansi b. Orisinalitas c. Novelty d. Kontribusi pada Ipteks-Sosbud e. Metode penelitian Potensi tercapainya luaran penelitian : a. Publikasi internasional b. Disertasi / draft disertasi yang telah disetuji pembimbing Kelayakan penelitian a. Jadwal penelitian b. Kesesuaian rencana biaya c. Sarana dan prasarana penelitian Jumlah
Bobot (%)
Skor
Nilai
20
35
30
15
100
Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7 = Sangat baik) Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai : ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ Kota, tanggal, bulan, tahun Penilai, Tanda tangan (
Nama Jelas
)
