THE WESTERN AND INDONESIAN ASSESSMENTS TO THE INDONESIAN POLICE BAD DEAL AS REFLECTED IN THEIR COMMENTS ON THE CORRESPONDING VIDEOS BROADCAST IN YOUTUBE
An Undergraduate Thesis
Submitted as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for Sarjana Sastra Degree
Dewi Kundarti 1009010014
FACULTY OF LETTERS UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO MARCH 2014
MOTTO
“Don’t be afraid to move, because the distanceof 1000 miles started by a single step”
Man JaddaWaJadda
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
Dedication This thesis is proudly dedicated to: My beloved father and mother *Sudarno and Siti Fatimah* Thank you so much for your endless love, prayer, motivation, advice, support, and everything given to me so I can realize that I can do the best to make you happy and proud of me. I love you so much... :* My beloved brothers: ‘Mas Lukmanudin’ who has given me all of the facilities to support my study; ‘Mas Muhadi’ who sometimes gives me money when I have run it out in boardinghouse and also my beloved sister ‘MbaNeniSetiyaningsih’ thanks for your affection, I know all of you how much you love me and care about me, all of you give me prayer and support. All Lecturers of Faculty of Letters; Sulasih Nurhayati, S.S., M. Hum., Widya Nirmalawati, S.S., M. A., Khristianto, S.S., M. Hum., Titik Wahyuningsih, S.S., M. Hum., Ambar Pujiyatno, S.S., M. Hum., Bustanudin As Suaidy, S.S., thanks for knowledge, attention, advice, etc. that has been given to me. My friends in arm (my beloved friends in Faculty of Letters Academic Year of 2010); FajriatinSubarkah, Nova Afida, Hanifah Al Shofianthi, AurinaApriyani, Martiana, GianRanggaPermana, and MitaYuliana thanks for the nicest relationship. My friends in Srikandi boardinghouse (behind Pokemon boardinghouse); EkaNurAensoy, MbaPhyta, MbaDewiAstuti, and Nurliana F thanks for laughing, supporting, sharing experience and happiness. Mba Dian who have shared her experience to me and always pushed to finish this thesis. MbaNurulChikmah who has helped and cared about me. Thanks for being my sister.
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all I would like to say thanks to Alloh SWT, who always gives His guidance, mercy, and permission so that I could finish my thesis as the partial fulfillment to get SarjanaSastradegree from Faculty of Letters of University of MuhammadiyahPurwokerto. First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my supervisor Khristianto, S.S., M.Hum., for his willingness for sharing times and patience in guiding, correcting, and supervising this thesis. I would also thank MbaMelly for helping to interpret some data of the thesis. Last but not least, I hope that this thesis will give some contributions to all of the readers. Purwokerto, March 14th 2014 DewiKundarti
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
ABSTRACT Kundarti, Dewi, 1009010014. 2014: The Western and Indonesian Assessments to the Indonesian Police Bad Deal as Reflected in Their Comments on the Corresponding Videos Broadcast in YouTube. Undergraduate Thesis for SarjanaSastra Degree, English Department, Faculty of Letters, University of MuhammadiyahPurwokerto. This research aimed (1) to convey the Western public assessments to the Indonesian Police Bad Deal (briefed IPBD) video, (2) to convey the Indonesian public assessments to the IPBD video and (3) to know how the Western and Indonesian assessments on IPBD video shape the discourse. This research applied Appraisal theory especially judgment aspect. This study applied qualitative method to give the detailed description and explanation of the linguistics phenomenon in Western and Indonesian public comments in seeing IPBD video provided in YouTube and also quantitative method to find out the dominant of kind of judgments on both public comments. The study revealed that all of judgment sub‐aspects were found in both group comments. There are 178 comments which have been analyzed. Western comments were dominated by criticizing journalist as the victim in IPBD video that is about 13,5 % or 24 comments, while Indonesian comments were dominated by condemning the police because he had corrupted. It was about 37,6 % or there were 67 comments. It meant that Western and Indonesian public had different assessments in commenting IPBD issue. Keywords: judgment, Appraisal theory, comment, IPBD video
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
INTISARI Kundarti, Dewi, 1009010014. 2014: PenilaianMasyarakat Barat dan Indonesia terhadapPolahNegatifPolisi Indonesia sepertiTercermindalamKomentarMerekapada Video Terkait yang Disiarkan di YouTube. Skripsi.SastraInggris, FakultasSastra, UniversitasMuhammadiyahPurwokerto. Penelitianinibertujuan (1) untukmenyajikangambaranmengenaipenilaianpublik Barat terhadap video polahnegativepolisi Indonesia (disingkat IPBD), (2) untukmenyajikangambaranmengenaipublik Indonesia terhadap video IPBD dan (3) untukmengetahuibagaimanapenilaianpublik Barat dan Indonesia dalam video IPBD membentukwacana. PenelitianinimengaplikasikanteoriAppraisalkhususnyaaspekjudgment. Kajianinimenerapkanmetodekualitatifuntukmemberikandeskripsidanpenjelasans ecara detail terhadapfenomenalinguisticdalamkomentar‐komentarpublik Barat dan Indonesia dalammelihat video IPBD yang tersedia di YouTube danjugamenerapkanmetodekuantitatifuntukmencarijenisjudgment yang dominandalamkomentar‐komentarkeduapublictersebut. Penelitianinimengungkapkanbahwasemua sub‐ aspekjudgmentditemukandalamkomentarkeduakelompokmasyarakattersebut.A da 178 komentar yang telahdianalisis.Komentarpublik Barat didominasiolehkritikanterhadapjurnalissebagaikorbandalam video IPBD yaitusekitar 13,5 % atau 24 komentar, sedangkankomentarpublik Indonesia didominasiolehkutukanterhadappolisikarenatelahkorupsi. Komentartersebutsekitar 37,6 % atauada 67 komentar. Hal iniberartibahwapublik Barat dan Indonesia memilikiperbedaanpenilaiandalammengomentariisu IPBD. Kata kunci: penilaian, teori Appraisal, komentar, video IPBD
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL SHEET ....................................................................................... VALIDATION SHEET ..................................................................................... STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ..................................................................... MOTTO ....................................................................................................... DEDICATION ............................................................................................... ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................. ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... INTISARI ..................................................................................................... TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................. LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................... LIST OF FIGURE ........................................................................................... LIST OF DIAGRAMS ..................................................................................... LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................. LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................................................
ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xii xiii xiv xv xvi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A.1 Background of the Research ..................................................................... 1 A.2 Problems of the Research .......................................................................... 4 A.3 Objectives of the Research ........................................................................ 5 A.4 Significance of the Research ...................................................................... 5 A.5 Limitation of the Research ......................................................................... 5 A.6 Definition of the Key Terms ....................................................................... 6 A.7 Organization of the Research Report ........................................................ 7 CHAPTER II REVIEW ON LITERATURE B.1 Theoretical Framework .............................................................................. B.1.1 Systematic Functional Linguistics ........................................................... B.1.1.1 Appraisal Theory ......................................................................... B.1.1.1.1 Attitude: Judgment ................................................... B.1.2 Discourse Analysis ................................................................................... B.2 Review on Related Researches ..................................................................
8 8 10 11 15 16
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY C.1 Design of the Research .............................................................................. C.2 Data and Source of Data ............................................................................ C.3 Method of Collecting Data ......................................................................... C.4 Technique of Collecting Data .....................................................................
20 20 21 22
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
C.5 Method of Analyzing Data ......................................................................... CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS D.1 Data Description ........................................................................................ D.2 Data Analysis .............................................................................................. D.2.1 Western Assessments to the IPBD Issue ......................................... D.2.1.1 Police (Cop) ......................................................................... D.2.1.2 Dutchman or Journalist ....................................................... D.2.2 Indonesian Assessments to the IPBD Issue ..................................... D.2.2.1 Polisi (Police) ....................................................................... D.2.2.2 Journalist ............................................................................. D.2.2.3 Film or IPBD videos ............................................................. D.2.2.4 Up Loader ............................................................................ D.2.3 The Differences between the Western and Indonesian Public Assessments to the IPBD Videos ...........................................
23
25 26 26 27 34 41 42 58 63 65 65
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS E.1 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 69 E.2 Suggestions................................................................................................. 70 REFERENCES……………………………………. ......................................................... 72 APPENDICES ............................................................................................... 74
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Judgments – Social Esteem ................................................................
12
Table 2. Judgments – Social Sanction ..............................................................
13
Table 3. Western Assessments to the IPBD videos ..........................................
28
Table 4. Indonesian Assessments to the IPBD videos ......................................
42
Table 5. Total Expression in Judging of IPBD Participant’s Character ..............
66
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
LIST OF FIGURE Figure 1. Framework of Appraisal Theory ........................................................
11
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
LIST OF DIAGRAMS Diagram 1. Western Assessments to the IPBD videos .....................................
29
Diagram 2. Indonesian Assessments to the IPBD videos .................................
42
Diagram 3. Total Expression in Judging of IPBD Participant’s Character .........
66
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IPBD : Indonesian Police Bad Deal IM
: Innocence of Moslem
SFL : Systemic Functional Linguistics SFG : Systemic Functional Grammar PPC : PolicePositive Comment PNC : Police Negative Comment JPC : Journalist Positive Comment JNC : Journalist Negative Comment FPC : Film Positive Comment FNC : Film Negative Comment UNC : Up loader Negative Comment RO : Response to the Other Commenter SE
: Social Esteem
SS
: Social Sanction
+
: ‘positive’
‐
: ‘negative’
dtp : directed to police dtj
: directed to journalist
dtv : directed to video dtu : directed to up loader
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 COMMENTS OF DATA OF THE FIRST VIDEO ................................
75
APPENDIX 1 COMMENTS OF DATA OF THE SECOND VIDEO ............................
84
The Western and Indonesian Assessments..., Dewi Kundarti, Fakultas Sastra UMP, 2014
