DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
Guyton and Hall. Fisiologi Kedokteran. 11th ed. Jakarta; 2011:256-64
2.
Sherwood L. Fisiologi Manusia: Dari Sel ke Sistem. In: 6th ed. Jakarta: EGC; 2011: 373–6.
3.
Gunawan L. Hipertensi Tekanan Darah Tinggi. (Kanisius, ed.). Yogyakarta; 2001:58-62.
4.
J Burns, E Labbe, K Williams JM. Perceived and Physiological Indicators of Relaxation: as different as Mozart and Alice in chains. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 3(24):197-198.
5.
R BT. Cardiovascular Physiology. Florence: Francis Marion University; 2004.245-63.
6.
J Messelbeck LS. Applying environmental product design to biomedical products research. 2000:997-1002.
7.
Myers,
M.G.
Comparison
Between
an
Automated
and
Manual
Sphygmomanometer in a Population Survey. Am J Hypertens. 2008: 280– 3. 8.
Amy S. Shah, M.D. Comparison of Mercury and Aneroid Blood Pressure Measurements in Youth. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):e1205–10.
9.
Christine A’Court, Richard Stevens, Sarah Sanders AW, Heneghan RM and C. Type and accuracy of sphygmomanometers in primary care: A cross-sectional observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(590):598–603.
10.
G.J Tortora B. D. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology. 12th ed. U.S.A:
55
56
Wiley; 2009:245-252 11.
Smeltzer SC. Buku Ajar Keperawatan Medikal Bedah. Vol 2. 8th ed. Jakarta: EGC; 2002:45-47.
12.
K, Sembulingan PS. Fisiologi Kedokteran. 5th ed. Pamulang: Binarupa Aksara; 2013:72-76.
13.
Ganong W. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 24th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2013:167-75.
14.
Majid A. Fisiologi Kardiovaskular. Medan: Bagian Fisiologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2005:16-21.
15.
Gasperin D, Netuveli G, Dias-da-Costa JS, Pattussi MP. Effect of psychological stress on blood pressure increase: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cad saude publica / Minist da Saude, Fund Oswaldo Cruz, Esc Nac Saude Publica. 2009;25(4):715-726.
16.
The American Institute of Stress. Stress Effects. Texas: The American Institute of Stress.2014.3-5
17.
Syaifuddin. Anatomi Fisiologi Untuk Mahasiswa Keperawatan. 3rd ed. Jakarta: EGC; 2006.81-89.
18.
Bungawati D, Richard SD. Kajian Indeks Massa Tubuh (IMT) Terhadap Tekanan Darah Pada Perawat di Rumah Sakit Baptis Kediri Dahlia Bungawati Kayetanus Aldy Pratama. 2011;4(2):94–103.
19.
Hillbom M, Saloheimo P, Juvela S. Alcohol Consumption, Blood Pressure, and the Risk of Stroke. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2011;13(3):208–13.
20.
Zilkens RR, Burke V, Hodgson JM, Barden A, Beilin LJ, Puddey IB. Red
57
wine and beer elevate blood pressure in normotensive men. Hypertension. 2005 May ;45(5):874–9. 21.
Simonetti GD, Schwertz R, Klett M, Hoffmann GF, Schaefer F, Wühl E. Determinants of blood pressure in preschool children: the role of parental smoking. Circulation. 2011 Jan 25 ;123(3):292–8
22.
Guessous I, Pruijm M, Ponte B, Ehret G, Ansermot N, Vuistiner P, et al. Ambulatory Pulse Pressure is Negatively associated with Excretions of Urinary Caffeine and its Metabolites. J Hypertens. 2015 Jun ;33 Suppl 1:e10–1.
23.
Gabriel J. Fisika Kedokteran. Jakarta: EGC; 1996;50-51.
24.
P.E Draws, M. Abdalla M, Rahman. Blood Pressure Measurement: Clinic, Home, Ambulatory, and Beyond. 2012:449-462.
25.
Kandou FM, Bahrun D, Kes M, Sompie SRUA, Narasiang IBS. Rancang Bangun Alat Ukur Tekanan Darah Manusia Menggunakan Sensor 2SMPP Yang Dapat Menyimpan Data. 2014:57-64.
26.
Suryono. Quality Control Tensimeter. In Semarang: FSM - UNDIP; 2014: 4–13
27.
Ma Y, Temprosa M, Fowler S, et al. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22(3):263-266.
28.
WHO. Guidance on Maintaining and Calibrating Non-Mercury Clinical Thermometers and Sphygmomanometers.; 2011;1-34.
29.
Eoin O’Brien, Gareth Beevers GYHL. Blood pressure measurement Part
58
IV—Automated sphygmomanometry: self blood pressure measurement. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2001;332(6):483-485. 30.
Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Riset Kesehatan Dasar (RISKESDAS) 2007. Lap Nas 2007. 2008:23-26
31.
Asia Pacific Hq Omron Healthcare Singapore PTE LTD. Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor Model HEM-7203. PT. OMRON Healthcare Indonesia. 2015.1-2.
32.
Sastroasmoro, Prof.Dr.Sudigdo dan Ismail PDS. Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis. 4th ed. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2011.542-72.
33.
Murti, Bisma. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Pengukuran. Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Solo:Mei 2011:16-18
34.
Mary L, McHugh. Interrater Reliability: the kappa statistic. Department of Nursing, National University. California.2012 Oct:22(3):276-282
35.
Canzanello VJ. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?. USA: Division of Hypertension, Mayo Clinic. 2001 Mar 12;161(5):729-31.
36.
TG, Pickering. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?. New York,USA:Integrative and Behavioral Cardiovascular Health Program, Zena & Michael A. Wiener, Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center. 2003 Feb;8(1):23-5.
LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance
59
Lampiran 2. Informed Consent
60
61
Lampiran 3. Kuesioner
62
Lampiran 4. Sertifikat Kalibrasi
63
64
65
66
Lampiran 5. Data Hasil Pengukuran Tekanan Darah No. Nama 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Subjek 1 Subjek 2 Subjek 3 Subjek 4 Subjek 5 Subjek 6 Subjek 7 Subjek 8 Subjek 9 Subjek 10 Subjek 11 Subjek 12 Subjek 13 Subjek 14 Subjek 15 Subjek 16 Subjek 17 Subjek 18 Subjek 19 Subjek 20 Subjek 21 Subjek 22 Subjek 23 Subjek 24 Subjek 25 Subjek 26 Subjek 27 Subjek 28 Subjek 29 Subjek 30 Subjek 31 Subjek 32 Subjek 33 Subjek 34 Subjek 35 Subjek 36
Jenis IMT Umur Kelamin (kg/m2) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P L L L L L L L L L L L
21 21 21 21 21 20 21 20 20 21 21 20 21 21 21 21 20 21 20 21 21 21 22 21 20 21 22 21 21 20 21 21 22 22 21 20
20,5 19,5 22,5 20,5 21 20 22,5 20 19,5 20,5 20 19,5 21 19,5 22,5 20,5 22 21,5 19 20 20,5 20 21,5 22 21,5 21,5 21,5 22 21,5 22 23,5 22 22,5 21,5 22,5 22
TD Digital Sistolik (mmHg) 112 104 120 106 113 117 93 110 85 122 112 109 110 105 112 98 113 111 100 102 119 106 106 109 103 120 124 138 108 108 116 119 133 130 123 105
TD Digital Diastolik (mmHg) 66 76 79 70 67 80 67 67 57 77 73 68 74 77 74 66 76 78 78 62 80 73 78 72 68 67 69 78 67 66 78 68 77 78 79 72
TD Pegas Sistolik (mmHg) 107 100 110 107 110 110 100 107 90 107 107 107 100 103 103 90 100 110 100 93 107 107 100 100 100 113 113 120 103 100 117 117 120 117 120 93
TD Pegas Diastolik (mmHg) 63 80 90 77 57 77 67 70 60 77 67 63 70 80 73 63 70 77 77 70 73 67 77 67 67 60 77 70 67 77 80 70 73 80 77 67
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
67
Subjek 37 Subjek 38 Subjek 39 Subjek 40 Subjek 41 Subjek 42 Subjek 43 Subjek 44 Subjek 45 Subjek 46 Subjek 47 Subjek 48 Subjek 49 Subjek 50
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
22 21 21 21 21 20 21 22 21 22 21 20 21 21
23 23,5 22,5 21,5 22,5 23 22 23,5 22 23 22 21,5 22,5 22,5
125 125 114 114 116 128 131 98 126 119 131 114 128 124
73 97 80 70 70 69 79 58 78 81 77 73 84 93
120 117 110 107 107 117 120 117 103 120 110 113 130 120
80 80 77 73 77 70 60 73 70 83 70 77 83 83
68
Lampiran 6. Hasil Analisis Statistik
Jenis Kelamin Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Jenis Kelamin Umur
IMT
N
Missing
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
L
25
100,0%
0
0,0%
25
100,0%
P
25
100,0%
0
0,0%
25
100,0%
L
25
100,0%
0
0,0%
25
100,0%
P
25
100,0%
0
0,0%
25
100,0%
Descriptives
a,b
Jenis Kelamin Umur
Total
L
P
Statistic
Mean
Std. Error
21,08
95% Confidence Interval for
Lower Bound
20,82
Mean
Upper Bound
21,34
5% Trimmed Mean
21,09
Median
21,00
Variance
,410
Std. Deviation
,640
Minimum
20
Maximum
22
Range
2
Interquartile Range
1
,128
Skewness
-,065
,464
Kurtosis
-,313
,902
Mean
20,76
,105
95% Confidence Interval for
Lower Bound
20,54
Mean
Upper Bound
20,98
5% Trimmed Mean
20,74
Median
21,00
Variance
,273
Std. Deviation
,523
Minimum
20
69
Maximum
IMT
L
22
Range
2
Interquartile Range
1
Skewness
-,295
,464
Kurtosis
-,008
,902
22,340
,1282
Mean 95% Confidence Interval for
Lower Bound
22,075
Mean
Upper Bound
22,605
5% Trimmed Mean
22,322
Median
22,500
Variance
,411
Std. Deviation
,6410
Minimum
21,5
Maximum
23,5
Range
2,0
Interquartile Range
,8
Skewness Kurtosis P
Mean
,402
,464
-,691
,902
20,700
,2102
95% Confidence Interval for
Lower Bound
20,266
Mean
Upper Bound
21,134
5% Trimmed Mean
20,689
Median
20,500
Variance Std. Deviation
1,104 1,0508
Minimum
19,0
Maximum
22,5
Range
3,5
Interquartile Range
1,5
Skewness Kurtosis
,386
,464
-,943
,902
70
Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov Jenis Kelamin Umur
IMT
Statistic
df
a,c
b
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
L
,310
25
,000
,786
25
,000
P
,397
25
,000
,691
25
,000
L
,182
25
,032
,903
25
,021
P
,175
25
,046
,929
25
,082
Descriptive Descriptive Statistics N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Umur
50
20
22
20,92
,601
IMT
50
19,0
23,5
21,520
1,1951
Valid N (listwise)
50
Case Summaries Tensimeter pegas sistol Tensimeter pegas diastol Tensimeter digital sistol Tensimeter digital diastol
N 50 50 50 50
Mean 108.38 72.66 114.28 73.68
Std. Deviation 8.868 7.093 11.010 7.446
Means
Reliability Sistolik
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid Excludeda Total
50 0 50
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
% 100.0 .0 100.0
Median 107.00 73.00 113.50 73.50
Minimum 90 57 85 57
Maximum 130 90 138 97
71
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .855
N of Items 2
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
Single Measures Average Measures
95% Confidence Interval Intraclass a Correlation Lower Bound Upper Bound .747b .594 .848 .855c .745 .918
Value 6.909 6.909
F Test with True Value 0 df1 df2 49.0 49 49.0 49
Sig .000 .000
Two-way mixed effects model where people effects are random and measures effects are fixed. a. Type C intraclass correlation coefficients using a consistency definition-the between-measure variance is excluded from the denominator variance. b. The estimator is the same, whether the interaction effect is present or not. c. This estimate is computed assuming the interaction effect is absent, because it is not estimable otherwise.
Reliability Diastolik
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary N Cases
Valid Excludeda Total
50 0 50
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .737
N of Items 2
% 100.0 .0 100.0
72
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
Single Measures Average Measures
95% Confidence Interval Intraclass a Correlation Lower Bound Upper Bound .583b .366 .740 .737c .536 .851
Value 3.796 3.796
F Test with True Value 0 df1 df2 49.0 49 49.0 49
Sig .000 .000
Two-way mixed effects model where people effects are random and measures effects are fixed. a. Type C intraclass correlation coefficients using a consistency definition-the between-measure variance is excluded from the denominator variance. b. The estimator is the same, whether the interaction effect is present or not. c. This estimate is computed assuming the interaction effect is absent, because it is not estimable otherwise.
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi Penelitian
73
74
Lampiran 8. Biodata Mahasiswa Identitas Nama
: Yossi Eriska
NIM
: 22010112140200
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Pekanbaru, 27 Desember 1994 Jenis kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jl. Bulusan Utara Raya No.01 , Tembalang, Semarang
Nomor HP
: 081328908308
e-mail
:
[email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal 1. SD
: SDN Islam As-Shofa
Lulus tahun
: 2006
2. SMP
: SMPN Islam As-Shofa
Lulus tahun
: 2009
3. SMA
: SMAN 5 Pekanbaru
Lulus tahun
: 2012
4. S1
: Pendidikan Dokter FK UNDIP
Masuk tahun : 2012
Keanggotaan Organisasi 1. Anggota Osis SMAN 5 Pekanbaru
Tahun 2009-2011
2. Anggota Paskibra Sekolah SMAN 5 Pekanbaru
Tahun 2009-2012
3. Anggota Paskibra Riau
Tahun 2010-2012
4. Anggota RHEU FK Undip
Tahun 2012-2015
5. Anggota Ikatan Mahasaiswa Riau Undip
Tahun 2012-Sekarang
