BOBLME-2015-Ecology-33

ii

BOBLME-2015-Ecology-33

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal and development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The BOBLME Project encourages the use of this report for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts or the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the BOBLME Project Regional Coordinator.

BOBLME contract: PO 4502241 For bibliographic purposes, please reference this publication as: BOBLME (2015) Report of the training on community perception monitoring for Marine Protected Areas staff in Indonesia's BOBLME region, 23–27 June 2015, Padang, Indonesia. BOBLME-2015-Ecology-33

ii

Training on community perception monitoring for Marine Protected Areas staff in Indonesia's BOBLME region

Final report Training on community perception monitoring for Marine Protected Areas staff in Indonesia’s BOBLME region

Date

23 – 27 June 2015

Location

Padang, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia

Implementing Agency

Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries

Hosting Agency

Directorate of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation Directorate General of Marine, Coasts, and Small Islands-MMAF

iii


Acknowledgment We would like to thank the people involved in this activity for contributing their time and expertise to making this training a successful one. We are grateful to the following resource persons who came to the training, despite their busy schedules, to share their knowledge: Mr Agus Dermawan (Director of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation - MMAF) and Ms Erni Widjajanti (Deputy Director of Fisheries Resources Management at Territorial and Archipelagic Waters - MMAF, and National Coordinator, BOBLME). Further, our gratitude also goes to Dr Ahsanal Kasasiah (Deputy Director of Network, Data and Information Conservation - MMAF) for her guidance and effort in coordinating the training committee. Thanks also to Coral Triangle Centre and Directorate of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation for providing us with excellent trainers, because without the presence of the trainers, learning about community perception monitoring could not have been achieved. Credit also for the committee for providing the needs and organizing a successful training. Finally, many thanks to FAO and BOBLME Project for supporting the training and giving the participants opportunity to develop their capacity in community perception monitoring.

iv


Table of contents 1.

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1

2.

Target participants ........................................................................................................................... 1

3.

Rationale for the training ................................................................................................................. 2

4.

Training objectives ........................................................................................................................... 3

5.

Training design ................................................................................................................................. 3

6.

Course content and training activities ............................................................................................. 5

6.1.

Day 1: Opening and community perception monitoring (concept, design and activity plan) ............................................................................................................................. 5

6.2.

Day 2: Questionnaire development and interview techniques................................................ 7

6.3.

Day 3: Implementation of perception monitoring (field exercise)........................................... 9

6.4.

Day 4: Interview data processing ........................................................................................... 10

6.5.

Day 5: Community perception monitoring report ................................................................. 10

7.

Review of training delivery ............................................................................................................ 12

8.

Comparison of pre-tests and post-tests, and training evaluation results ..................................... 13

9.

Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 14

Appendix I

List of participants and trainers ...................................................................................... 15

Appendix II

Training agenda .............................................................................................................. 21

Appendix III Pre-test and post-test results ......................................................................................... 23 Appendix IV Group report on community perception monitoring ..................................................... 24 Appendix V

Individual questionnaire ................................................................................................. 33

Appendix VI Household questionnaire................................................................................................ 34 Appendix VII Temporary training certificate ........................................................................................ 37 Appendix VIII Training completion certificate ....................................................................................... 38

List of figures Figure 1 Training opening ceremony ...................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 Set the stage - establishing ground rules .................................................................................. 4 Figure 3 Group presentation on monitoring (general) and perception monitoring ............................... 6 Figure 4 Group presentation on selecting household target survey per village using random technique ................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 5 Participants work on perception monitoring steps .................................................................. 8 Figure 6 An exercise for conducting interview with peers ..................................................................... 8 Figure 7 Trainees play roles as household members and enumerators (interviewer) to practice on selecting respondents of household, man and woman © DB. Mochran/CTC........................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 8 Interviewing selected respondent at target village © DB. Mochran/CTC ................................ 9 Figure 9 Data input in processing data template © DB. Mochran/CTC................................................ 10

v


Figure 10 Participant presents the results of data analysis and survey report .................................... 11 Figure 11 Certificate awarding ceremony ............................................................................................. 11 Figure 12 Training closing ceremony .................................................................................................... 12 Figure 13 Group work to use random numbers and select household targets .................................... 13 Figure 14 A result of individual quiz...................................................................................................... 13

Acronyms used BOBLME

Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem

FAO

Food and Agriculture Organisation

MCRMP

Marine and Coastal Resources Management Project

MMAF

Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries

MPA

Marine Protected Area

TOR

Terms of Reference

vi


Final report Training on community perception monitoring for Marine Protected Area staff in Indonesia’s region of the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME)

1. Introduction The training was organized and implemented by the Directorate of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation, Directorate General of Marine, Coasts, and Small Islands Affairs of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, and supported by the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME) Project of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The training was held 23 – 27 June 2015 in in Padang, West Sumatra Province. Basko Premier Hotel in Padang was used as the training venue for in class sessions, while the field exercise was conducted in Sungai Pisang village, in Padang Pariaman District.

2. Target participants There were 22 participants who joined the training; they represented various government agencies that are involved in the management of national or district MPA within Indonesia’s BOBLME area as follow: 1. Bina Bahari MPA, Aceh Besar District, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province 2. Pulau Pisisi MPA, Simeuleu District, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province 3. Pesisir Timur Pulau Weh MPA, Sabang District, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province 4. District MPA of Padang Pariaman, West Sumatera Province 5. Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang MPA, Padang city, West Sumatera Province 6. Pulau Ujung, Pulau Tangah and Pulau Angso MPA, Pariaman city, West Sumatera Province 7. Pulau Penyu MPA, Pesisir Selatan District, West Sumatera Province 8. North Nias MPA, North Nias District, North Sumatera Province 9. Central Tapanuli MPA, Central Tapanuli District, North Sumatera Province 10. Serdang Bedagai MPA, Serdang Bedagai District, North Sumatera Province 11. Terubuk Fish Sanctuary, Bengkalis District, Riau Province 12. Training Centre for Marine and Fisheries, Agency for Human Resources Development of Marine and Fisheries-MMAF 13. Pulau Pieh National MPA, Pekanbaru National MPA Management Unit-MMAF 14. Padang Technical Unit for Management of Marine and Coastal Resources-MMAF 15. North Sumatera Province Marine and Fisheries Office 16. Directorate of Fish Resources, DG of Capture Fisheries Names of the participants are in Appendix I. The 22 training participants have already met participant minimum requirements which include: 

Diploma-4 or bachelor degree (although lower education level could be accepted if deemed eligible by training organizer/trainer).



Have duty and function on management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area.

1




Attended at least one basic training on aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area management.



Minimum age of 23 years old.



Good physical and mental condition.



Having ability to create and deliver presentation.



Bring laptop and familiar with word and data processing software such as MS Word and MS Excel.



Having minimum one-year work experience.



Able to articulate his/her opinion and concept clearly.

3. Rationale for the training The Bay of Bengal area is bordered by eight countries which include Maldives, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia. About 400 million people who live on the area are dependent on its resources for food, livelihood and security. Unfortunately, the sustainability of the coastal populations’ livelihoods in the future is threatened by high population growth, fish stocks overexploitation, and habitat degradation. Recognizing this, the eight countries materialized their commitments to improve the lives of coastal populations as well as the regional management of the area through the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME) Project. In Indonesia, the BOBLME Project covers four provinces namely Aceh, North Sumatera, West Sumatra and Riau Province. There are currently 16 Marine Protected Areas (MPA) at national and local level (district or provincial) that are located within the boundaries of the BOBLME in Sumatra, Indonesia, extending to a total 4,083.66 km2. In 2014, these MPAs are contributing to the 16.4 million hectares of MPAs out of 20 million hectares that have been targeted to be established in 2020. Besides targeting 20 million hectares of MPAs by 2020, Indonesia also focuses on how to manage these MPAs effectively so that they can provide economic benefits to the community as well as ensuring the sustainability of the environment. However, Indonesia is facing challenges to manage these MPAs effectively due to limited human resource and technical capacity, not to mention insufficient funding. To ensure effectively managed marine conservation areas, there are three aspects that should be considered: biophysical, socioeconomics and governance. There are series of information that may feed to those three aspects resourced from continuous data series as a result of regular monitoring. Community perception monitoring is a tool to collect data and information related to the benefit and impact of the MPA towards their socioeconomic condition. Community in the context of MPA management is being considered as important stakeholders, as they are impacted by management interventions that are applied to achieve management effectiveness of the MPA. The aims for community perception monitoring are (a) to obtain community perception on how the MPAs have been managed; (b) to improve MPA adaptive management by accommodating inputs from various stakeholders; and (c) to enrich outreach and extension programs by integrating the pattern of community perception resulted from regular monitoring. Based on the above background, the training on community perception monitoring is very important to strengthening the capacity of MPA management personnel within Indonesia’s BOBLME area.

2


4. Training objectives In general, the training project objective is to improve and strengthen technical capacity of MPA staff in monitoring community perception, in particular: a. To give knowledge on one socioeconomic monitoring method that supports MPA management from the perspective of the community that lives inside and in surrounding areas of an MPA. b. To give a forum for enhancing skill in developing questionnaire, interviewing respondents, analysing and reporting the program. c. At the end of training, trainees will be able to develop and implement monitoring methodology, develop a plan for field implementation, and develop monitoring report to become the basis for adaptive management.

5. Training design The five days course consists of facilitation skills training as well as technical training in community perception monitoring through incorporating theory into practice via various training sessions, namely: background presentation, assessment, monitoring, ground rules, concept and methodology, field practical exercise, data processing and reporting, and evaluation. Following are the basic descriptions: a.

Opening

Mr Agus Dermawan, Director of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation, DG of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, MMAF opened the training and gave opening remark (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Training opening ceremony

b.

Background presentation

This session was intended to setting up the scene, as it provided participants with background and importance of the training to the management of MPA in BOBLME areas. For this purpose, two resource persons, namely Dr Ahsanal Kasasiah (Deputy Director of Networks, Data and Information of Conservation) and Ms Erni Widjajanti (Deputy Director of Fisheries Resources Management at Territorial and Archipelagic Waters) were employed. Specifically, Dr Kasasiah presented about policy

3


management of MPA in Indonesia’s BOBLME area, while Ms Widjajanti lectured about support of BOBLME Project to the management of MPAs in Indonesia’s BOBLME area. c.

Assessment

Assessment forms were distributed to the trainees before the training began. Trainees were asked to identify his/her experiences or capability to low or medium or high level on several items: 1) social economic monitoring, 2) as enumerator, 3) as questionnaire developer, and 4) Excel application. This form helped trainers to tailor training materials and modules according to the trainees’ profile. In general, participants marked their experiences/capability into medium to low level. d.

Monitoring

Pre- and post-test was administered at the beginning and at the end of the training. Pre- or post-test is a pair test to measure the change of participants’ knowledge as a direct result of the training. e.

Ground rules

Trainer facilitated a discussion on training ground rules to engage participants’ involvement to all training sessions and to create a good atmosphere of training (Figure 2). All participants agreed upon (1) silent mode for mobile phone, (2) no texting in class, (3) active participation, (4) be punctual, and (5) fine applied for any violation.

Figure 2 Set the stage - establishing ground rules

4


f.

Concept and methodology

First and second day of training was spent in the class room on providing lectures which were designed to provide the trainees with fundamental concept and methodology on community perception monitoring in more understandable/comprehensible form that could easily be discussed between the lecturer and the group. g.

Field exercise

The field exercise aimed to provide trainees with interview experience using questionnaire, and to familiarize trainees with questionnaire for further revision as necessary. The exercise was also designed to enhance the skill set of each participant in collecting data on socio economic. The field exercise was conducted in Sungai Pisang village, a fisher village in Padang Pariaman District MPA. In this exercise trainees learned that enumerator responsibilities as well as to review the completeness of questionnaire component. h.

Data processing and reporting

This activity involved working on Excel format, formula, and menus (pivot table, data validation and chart). Participants learned the effective and easier way how to input interview data, process data, and produce graphs. Participants who had been divided into seven groups then presented the results of the processed data. i.

Evaluation

The training incorporated two types of evaluations, namely knowledge and training implementation evaluation. The participant knowledge was assessed through various combinations of tasks: presentation, quiz, discussions, and field exercises. While the training implementation was evaluated using a survey which was distributed to the participants at the end of the training. It mainly assessed the participant’s perception to the overall training process.

6. Course content and training activities The training covered five topics on community perception monitoring, namely: concept of community perception monitoring, perception monitoring design, perception monitoring activity plan, implementation of perception monitoring, and reporting of perception monitoring. All the materials were delivered by three trainers from Coral Triangle Centre and Directorate of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation-MMAF (list of trainers is provided in Appendix I) through various activities in the course of five training days. The training activities consisted of group activity, peer-interview role play, data input and analysis as well as group reporting. The following shows the daily order of training activities, training topics as well as its delivering method content as implemented by the trainers (details of the training agenda attached as Appendix II):

6.1.

Day 1: Opening and community perception monitoring (concept, design and activity plan)

Day 1 was a day of introductions which started with opening session that comprised of background presentations from resource persons and introduction of the training programs. Trainers gave a brief introduction of the course programs to the participants. The first day was the perfect time for trainers and participants to share expectations and agree on ground rules. Pre-test was also administered during the introduction session. The first day covered three topics namely: the concept of community perception monitoring in MPA, preparation of community perception monitoring design, and developing activity plan for monitoring community perception. The first topic encompassed subjects like types of monitoring in Marine Protected Area, socio-economic monitoring concept, and community perception monitoring as a part of socio-economic monitoring in Marine Protected Area. It was delivered through presentation 5


lecture. Training activities included were facilitated group discussion and group presentation. Participants were divided into groups to present and discuss several subjects such as what to do in monitoring, type and examples of monitoring, and components of community perception (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Group presentation on monitoring (general) and perception monitoring

Following the concept of perception monitoring, trainers introduced all matters related to perception monitoring design to the participant, which include: protocol and terms of reference in perception monitoring, selecting villages and households targets, selecting household and individual respondents; household and individual questionnaires. The topic matters were delivered using discussion, group work and presentation, as well as individual exercise. Major component of questionnaires and questions in household and individual questionnaires were among the matters that were discussed by participants. While in group work, participants were divided into four groups, where each group developed Terms of Reference (TOR) based on Sungai Pisang village information and using perception monitoring methodology learned in the classroom. Likewise, participants, individually or in group, exercised using random numbers & tables to select target household, household and individual respondents. Their work was then presented to the class as depicted in Figure 4.

6


Figure 4 Group presentation on selecting household target survey per village using random technique

The last topic of day 1 was the perception monitoring activity plan. In this topic, participants learned about secondary data collection and data collection tools, monitoring team establishment and work plan development, as well as using questionnaires to collect primary data. Trainees applied group work and presentation as methods and activities in delivering the topic. Participants were given tasks in groups to work on steps of perception monitoring, and presented it to the class as depicted in Figure 5.

6.2.

Day 2: Questionnaire development and interview techniques

Day 2 is the continuation of the perception monitoring activity plan topic. In day 2 participants were exposed to individual questionnaire development, interview techniques, and interview practice as well as field exercise preparation. Participants individually practiced on interviewing and working on two types of questionnaire. Likewise, trainees in groups also conducted peer-interview role play, in which they comprehensively practiced on how to select 3 respondents (household, man, & woman), as well as practicing ethics and interviewing procedure (depicted in Figures 6 and 7).

7


Figure 5 Participants work on perception monitoring steps

Figure 6 An exercise for conducting interview with peers

8


Figure 7 Trainees play roles as household members and enumerators (interviewer) to practice on selecting respondents of household, man and woman © DB. Mochran/CTC

6.3.

Day 3: Implementation of perception monitoring (field exercise)

The field exercise took place in Sungai Pisang village, which is located in Padang Pariaman District about 1 hour travelling by bus. Participants learned on how to implement perception monitoring and related aspects, namely data collection, checking completeness of questionnaires, and data input into Excel program. During the field trip, participants divided into seven groups, each group assigned to collect data through interview from two households and four individual respondents (male and female respondents per household). They also practiced individually checking the completeness of questionnaire component using checking form. Following the field exercise, in class, each participant worked individually on entering data into Excel format as guided by the trainer. Participants’ activities during field trip and data input are depicted on Figures 8 and 9.

Figure 8 Interviewing selected respondent at target village © DB. Mochran/CTC

9


Figure 9 Data input in processing data template © DB. Mochran/CTC

6.4.

Day 4: Interview data processing

In day 4, participants were provided with knowledge and practice on data processing as well as data visualization using various diagrams. The topic was delivered using group exercise as well as presentations. Each participant worked in groups on processing data and creating tables and graphs using some formula in Excel as guided by a trainer. Further, each group then was assigned to process and analyse 4-5 questions from individual perception data.

6.5.

Day 5: Community perception monitoring report

The last day of the training was mainly spent developing community perception monitoring report. Participants in group were required to create descriptive reports on perception monitoring based on their field exercise findings and processed data. All groups then presented their report to the class, followed by discussion (Figure 10). An example of a group report is attached as Appendix IV. At the end of the day 5 session, we administered post-test to the participants to measure how much the participants were able to learn and retain after undergoing five days of training. Evaluation survey forms were also distributed to the participants, which provide a chance for the participants to evaluate overall training implementation (trainers, training contents and delivery methods, logistics, and time management), as well as to give suggestions for future training improvements. The training culminated in form of a simple awarding ceremony of certificates of completion to the participants and closing ceremony. Dr Ahsanal Kasasiah, Deputy Director for Network, Data and Information of Conservation, Directorate Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation awarded the certificate to the participants as well as gave the closing remarks to conclude the training (Figures 11 and 12). Additionally, each participant received a USB thumb drive which contains all files of lecture presentations, training module, and pictures.

10


Figure 10 Participant presents the results of data analysis and survey report

Figure 11 Certificate awarding ceremony

11


Figure 12 Training closing ceremony

7. Review of training delivery In a standard training procedure, it is very important to conduct a Training Need Assessment prior to training implementation. The assessment helps trainers to design training based on potential training participants’ profile. Of this BOBLME Perception Monitoring Training, out of 27 assessment forms sent out to participants, there were only 2 forms returned for analysis. However, all the training contents was delivered well, and more importantly, understood by the participants. This was apparent during the training days that all participants were eager and actively participated on discussion session. Moreover, based on our observation and review on individual and groups’ performance (knowledge and skill), participants were able to complete all the assigned tasks during the training. Specifically, all groups were able to use random table and to select household targets. Figure 13 depicts a random table and selected household targets produced by one group. Similarly, during field exercise they managed to collect a total amount of 14 household respondents and 22 individual respondents through interview process. Examples of individual questionnaire and household questionnaire are provided in Appendix V and Appendix VI, respectively. In addition, with prior basic knowledge on Excel, participants were able to perform well in administering data into Excel format correctly, using assigned/pre-determined formula to produce tables and visual graphics. Lastly, all groups performed well in producing, submitting and presenting their descriptive perception monitoring report.

12


Figure 13 Group work to use random numbers and select household targets

8. Comparison of pre-tests and post-tests, and training evaluation results For both monitoring and evaluation purposes, we administered pre- and post-tests as well as evaluation survey to the participants. Pre- and post-tests were administered at the beginning and at the end of the training respectively, while evaluation survey was distributed to the participants before closing. As mentioned before, pre- and post-tests is a pair test to measure the change of participants’ knowledge as a direct result of the training. The tests focus on the course contents and provide us with participants’ knowledge on community perception related topics before and after the course. The test results indicated that there was an increase on the level of understanding of the participants within the five days of training. Pre-test and post-test average marks show an increase of 25 points from 42.78 to 67.78. Participants score in pre-test and post-tests is provided in Appendix III. A result of participant individual quiz is shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14 A result of individual quiz

13


With regard to the evaluation of training process, the result showed that 5 participants and 16 participants respectively stated that they were very satisfied and satisfied with the training. Similarly, the majority of the participants mentioned field exercise, data input and processing were the three most interesting parts. Additionally, participants showed their interest either to have the perception monitoring training for their staff or even to have more in-depth perception monitoring in their MPAs. Other feedback from the group included inserting games, and adding more group discussion, as well as request for additional time to discuss the topics.

9. Conclusion The training on community perception monitoring has been carried out successfully and achieved the training objectives. For the course of five days, 22 participants gained knowledge on the concepts of community perception monitoring, as well as were capable to design and implement community perception monitoring in MPA. It was also noticed that all participants were eager and actively participated to follow all the training activities. Further, based on the pre-test and post-test results, it was evident that the training participants’ understanding on community perception monitoring had improved. In addition, most of the participants felt that the training implementation was satisfactory.

14


Appendix I

List of participants and trainers

Participants No. Name

Institution (in Bahasa)

1.

Sulfianto. S.Pi

Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Simeulue

2.

Nofiarman

DKP Kota Padang

3.

Lovedrian Ariston

BPSPL Padang

4.

Windi Syahrian, S.Pi.

BPSPL Padang

15


5.

Oyong Hasanudin

Pengelola/Pemilik Pulau Penyu

6.

Syefrianto Permana

Loka PKU, TWP Pieh

7.

Nadia Amalina Daniel

Satker TWP Pulau Pieh dan laut sekitarnya

8.

Citrha Aditur Bahri

DKP Kota Pariaman

9.

Muchlizar

DKP Kab. Bengkalis

16


10.

Nofarianty

DKP Padang Pariaman

11.

Roy Bary

BP3 Medan

12.

Riska Eka Putri, S.Pi, M.Si

Dinas KP Kota Padang

13.

Nasrizal

DKP Kab. Padang Pariaman

14.

Emila Busmerri

DKP Kab. Kep. Mentawai

17


15.

Afriman Julta

DKP Kab. Pesisir Selatan

16.

Hendra Saputra

DKP Bengkalis

17.

Very Hasudungan Sinaga, S.Pi.

DKP Kab. Serdang Bedagai

18.

Edmonri

DKP Kota Pariaman

19.

Mukhrezar

DKP Kota Sabang

18


20.

Rizal Rifai

Direktorat Sumber Daya Ikan

21.

Marzuki

KKPD Aceh Besar

22.

Adrianus Ziliwu

DKP Kab. Nias Utara

19


Trainers No.

Name

Institution

1.

Silvianita Timotius

Coral Triangle Center

2.

Denny Boy Mochran

Coral Triangle Center

3.

Agus Widayanto

Directorate of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation

20


Appendix II

Training agenda Agenda

Capacity building on community perception monitoring for MPAs staff in Indonesia’s BOBLME area 23-27 June 2015

Time Day-1 08.30 09.00

Duration (minute) 30 60

Activities

Registration 

Opening by Director of Marine and Aquatic Resources Conservation, DG of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, MMAF, Indonesia  Participants introduction  Pre-Test for participantss 10.00 20 Coffee break 10.20 40 Presentation by Deputy Director of Networks, Data and Information of Conservation : Policy management of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) Module 1: The concept of community perception monitoring in MPA 11.00 60  Overview of monitoring in MPA  Monitoring community perception in MPA 12.00 60 Lunch break Module 2: Preparation of community perception monitoring design in MPA 13.00 15 Develop Term of Reference (TOR) 13.15 90 Community perception monitoring design  Selection of villages/locations targets  Selection of target households and household respondents (theory and practice)  Selection of individual respondents (theory and practice)  The type of information collected monitoring of perception 14.45 30 Coffee break Module 3: Developing activity plan for monitoring community perception in MPA 15.15 15 Monitoring team establishment and work plan development 15.30 15 Secondary data collection and data collection tool 15.45 60 Primary data collection using questionnaires:  Rules and guidelines and survey design  Household questionnaire 16.45 15 Summary of day-1 and preparation for day 2 Day-2 08.30 15 Evaluation of day-1 08.45 60 Individual questionnaire development (part-1) 09.45 20 Coffee break 10.05 55 Individual questionnaire development (part-2) 11.00 60 Community perception monitoring TOR development 12.00 60 Lunch break

21


13.00 30 Introduction to interview techniques 13.30 60 Interview practice (part-1) 14.30 30 Coffee break 15.00 90 Interview practice (part-1) 16.30 10 Summary of day 2 and preparation for day 3 16.40 20 Preparation for field trip Day-3 Module 4: Monitoring of public perception in MPAs 07.00 90 Preparation and departure to field trip location 08.30 270  Data collection  Lunch break 13.00 90 Return to hotel 14.30 30 Coffee break 15.00 75  Review on data collection activity  Data validation 16.15 10 Summary of day 3 and preparation for day 4 Day-4 08.30 30 Evaluation of day 3 09.00 60 Data input 10.00 20 Coffee break 10.20 100  Data processing  Presentation of the data processing result by each group 12.00 60 Lunch Break 13.00 60 Cont.: Presentation of the data processing result by each group 14.00 60 Discussion Module 5: Report on community perception monitoring 15.00 30 Coffee break 15.30 15 Report structure and type 15.45 75 The development of community perception monitoring report 17.00 10 Summary of day 4 and preparation for day 5 Day-5 08.30 15 Day 4 evaluation 08.45 60 Cont.: The development of community perception monitoring report 09.45 20 Coffee break 10.05 60 Presentation on community perception monitoring report 11.05 55 Discussion on adoption of the community perception monitoring in own MPA 12.00 60 Lunch break 13.00 30 Post-test for participant 13.30 15 Closing by Deputy Director of Networks, Data and Information of Conservation

22


Appendix III

Pre-test and post-test results Marks

No.

Name

Pre-test

Post-test

1

Sulfianto. S.Pi

37

72

2

Nofiarman

36

42

3

Eduar Bangun

36

0

4

Lovedrian Ariston

32

77

5

Windi Syahrian, S.Pi.

52

59

6

Oyong Hasanudin

31

67

7

Syefrianto Permana

45

66

8

Nadia Amalina Daniel

56

82

9

Citrha Aditur Bahri

41

75

10

Muchlizar

41

82

11

Nofarianty

52

68

12

Roy Bary

37

65

13

Riska Eka Putri, S.Pi, M.Si

43

74

14

Nasrizal

39

80

15

Emila Busmerri

51

72

16

Afriman Julta

40

41

17

Hendra Saputra

60

84

18

Very Hasudungan Sinaga, S.Pi.

40

87

19

Edmonri

45

77

20

Mukhrezar

28

74

21

Rizal Rifai

57

81

22

Marzuki

49

65

23

Adrianus Ziliwu

36 42,78

69 67,78

Average

23


Appendix IV

Group report on community perception monitoring

LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT DI KAWASAN KONSERVASI PERAIRAN TAMAN PULAU KECIL KOTA PADANG PROVINSI SUMATERA BARAT (TINGKAT PENDIDIKAN & PENYEBAB PERMASALAHAN UTAMA DI LAUT DAN PESISIR) Disusun oleh: Kelompok 4 Nofarianty Mukhlizar Muchrizal

Padang, Juni 2015

24


PENDAHULUAN

A. Latar Belakang Sejalan dengan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan terutama terhadap pemanfaatan sumberdaya ikan dan habitatnya, perlu dilakukan upaya pelestarian sumberdaya ikan dan habitatnya melalui pembentukan konservasi perairan. Upaya konservasi atau perlindungan yang dilakukan adalah dalam rangka pengelolaan sumberdaya ikan dan habitatnya untuk menjamin pemanfaatannya secara bijaksana dan berkesinambungan dengan tetap memelihara dan meningkatkan kualitas nilai serta keanekaragamannya. Pemerintah Kota Padang telah mencadangkan sebagian wilayah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecilnya untuk menjadi Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang berdasarkan SK Wali Kota Padang Nomor 397 Tahun 2014 tentang Pencadangan Kawasan Konservasi Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil Sebagai Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang. Kawasan Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang mencakup 6 pulau yakni Pulau Sironjong, Pulau Sikuai, Pulau Pasumpahan, Pulau Ula, Pulau Setan dan Pulau Sirandah. Pulau-pulau tersebut terletak dalam wilayah adminsitrasi Desa Sungai Pisang. Sungai Pisang merupakan salah satu desa pesisir di Kelurahan Teluk Kabung Selatan, Kecamatan Teluk Kabung, Kota Padang. Di kawasan ini sudah sering mendapatkan bantuan, program pengelolaan dan pengembangan Kawasan Konservasi Perairan dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil (KKP3K), seperti program Marine and Coastal Resources Management Project (MCRMP-ADB) tahun 2003-2008. Masyarakat di desa pesisir Sungai Pisang pada umumnya bergantung pada sumberdaya kelautan dan perikanan. Untuk mencapai desa Sungai Pisang dapat ditempuh dengan jalur darat dan laut. Jika menggunakantransportasi darat melalui medan yang cukup sulit dengan jarak tempuh 45 menit dari IbukotaPadang. Sedangkan dengan jalur laut dapat ditempuh 30 menit dari Pelabuhan Teluk Bayur Padang. Potensi sumberdaya laut dan pesisir yang dimiliki Sungai Pisang sangat beragam seperti terumbu karang, ekosistem mangrove, padang lamun, ikan karang, dll. Untuk mengembangkan potensi sumberdaya laut dan pesisir yang terdapat dalam kawasan ini, pemerintah Kota Padang telah mengatur kawasan tersebut dengan menerapkan zonasi kawasan yakni zona inti, zona pemanfaatan dan zona lainnya. Berlandaskan dari pengelolaan kawasan konservasi tersebut, Pemerintah Kota Padangakan menerapkan sistem untuk memonitor persepsi stakeholderatau pemangku kepentingan terhadap pengelolaan pesisir dan laut di wilayah Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Program ini akan dilakukan melalui proses wawancara oleh pewawancara independen.

B. Tujuan Pemantauan Persepsi Adapun tujuan Pemantauan Persepsi adalah: a. Sebagai alat monitoring untuk mengetahui sejumlah indikator dasar tentang sikap, (sebagai contoh terhadap berbagai peraturan), dan persepsi masyarakat (sebagai contoh terhadap kondisi dan pemanfatan sumberdaya) yang dapat dikuantifikasi sehingga memungkinkan kita untuk (a) memantau kecenderungan sikap dan persepsi seiring dengan perjalanan waktu, dan (b) mengetahui dampak yang ditimbulkan dari program pengelolaan yang telah dilaksanakan seperti: program penyadartahuan (outreach dan awareness) dan penegakan aturan, terhadap persepsi dan sikap masyarakat pemangku kepentingan utama di KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. b. Sebagai sarana penelitian formatif yang akan mempermudah pengelola KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat untuk lebih mengetahui sikap, persepsi, dan tingkah laku masyarakat pemangku kepentingan yang tinggal di dan berinterakasi dengan perairan pesisir dan laut sekitar KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, salah satunya di desa

25


Sungai Pisang. Penelitian ini akan: (a) menghasilkan data kualitatif dan kuantitatif yang menggambarkan tingkat kesadaran masyarakat, serta sikap dan tingkah laku yang berhubungan dengan lingkungan secara umum dan khususnya masyarakat pesisir Sungai Pisang; (b) mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor budaya dan sosioekonomis yang mungkin bisa menghalangi atau mempermudah penerimaan masyarakat terhadap kegiatan-kegiatan yang ramah lingkungan; dan (c) menjadi sumber informasi untuk mengetahui jenis program pengelolaan yang kelihatannya dapat memberikan dampak terhadap sikap dan tingkah laku masyarakat. Program monitoring ini juga akan memberikan informasi dasar untuk memantau kecenderungan tentang persepsi masyarakat terhadap efektifitas pengelolaan dan status sumberdaya alam selama selang waktu pelaksanaan program. Berbagai informasi tersebut sangat diperlukan untuk: (a) menyempurnakan program peningkatan kesadaran dan/atau kepedulian masyarakat oleh Program bersama, (b) memberikan masukan untuk pengelolaan yang adaptif dengan mempertimbangkan masukan dari pemangku kepentingan, (c) mengukur efektifitas upaya pengelolaan dan penyadar-tahuan masyarakat yang telah diterapkan.

C. Lokasi kegiatan monitoring persepsi Lokasi kegiatan monitoring persepsi adalah Desa Sungai Pisang, Kelurahan Teluk Kabung Selatan, Kecamatan Teluk Kabung, Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat yang mencakup masyarakat yang tinggal di desa pesisir. METODOLOGI Metodologi yang akan dipergunakan merupakan perpaduan dari berbagai prosedur monitoring standar yang telah dijabarkan dalam buku Socioeconomic Monitoring for Coastal Managers in Southeast Asia (SocMon SEA) oleh Bunce dan Pomeroy (2003).

A. Prosedur umum pemilihan responden Pengumpulan data untuk monitoring ini akan dilakukan dalam tiga tahap yakni: pengumpulan data kepala keluarga di semua kampung sasaran, wawancara rumah tangga dan wawancara perorangan. Prosedur pengumpulan data adalah sebagai berikut: a. Pengumpulan data kepala keluarga. i.

Satu desa di KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang akan dipilih berdasarkan kriteria tertentu. Kriteria untuk pemilihan desa tersebut adalah desa dengan: (a) mayoritas penduduknya memanfaatkan sumberdaya alam laut dan pesisir disekitarnya untuk keperluan konsumsi sehari-hari dan sumber penghasilan, (b) sebagian penduduknya telah tersentuh oleh program Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kota Padang melalui program pengembangan dan penyadar-tahuan masyarakat.

ii.

Tim POKJA KKP akan mengumpulkan data tentang demografi di desa yang dipilih sebagai target untuk wawancara. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kota Padang akan membantu melaksanakan sensus untuk mendapatkan daftar seluruh rumah tangga (nama-nama kepala keluarga) di desa sasaran. Koordinator konstituensi dan outreach KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang akan bertanggung jawab dalam pengadaan data tersebut.

iii.

Berdasarkan informasi tersebut diatas, POKJA KKP akan menyiapkan tinjauan singkat yang berisi gambaran tentang situasi desa sebagai informasi dasar untuk mendukung pengembangan protokol ini.

b. Wawancara rumah tangga dan wawancara perorangan. i.

Empat belas rumah tangga di desa yang dijadikan target wawancara atau sejumlah 200 rumah tangga akan dipilih untuk diwawancarai. Rumah tangga akan dipilih secara acak

26


berdasarkan daftar rumah tangga yang tersedia di desa yang telah disediakan oleh Tim POKJA KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang. ii.

Semua anggota rumah tangga yang berusia antara 15 sampai 59 tahun memenuhi syarat untuk diwawancarai. Ini merupakan kisaran usia dimana individu kemungkinan secara ekonomis masih produktif serta terlibat aktif dalam roda kehidupan sosial dan ekonomi.

iii.

Kepala keluarga dan anggota keluarga yang dituliskan dalam daftar penghuni rumah tangga (laki-laki dan perempuan) dalam daftar pertanyaan untuk rumah tangga adalah orang yang tidak bepergian dalam jangka waktu yang lama atau selama tenggang waktu pelaksanaan survey.

iv.

Seseorang dikatakan anggota rumah tangga apabila orang tersebut hidup dan tinggal di dalam rumah tangga secara permanen dan menggunakan dapur yang sama di dalam rumah tangga.

v.

Satu orang laki-laki dan satu orang perempuan akan dipilih secara acak dari daftar individu yang memenuhi syarat di dalam rumah tangga untuk wawancara perorangan. Tabel pemilihan acak untuk laki-laki dan perempuan telah disiapkan oleh tim teknis POKJA KKP. Pewawancara tidak diperbolehkan untuk mengganti individu yang terpilih dengan anggota rumah tangga lainnya untuk wawancara ini.

B. Prosedur umum pemilihan pewawancara a. Pewawancara akan dipilih dari perorangan yang independen yang saat ini tidak bekerja sebagai staf, kontraktor, atau konsultan POKJA KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang. b. Sebanyak 3 orang akan dikontrak sebagai tenaga pewawancara. c. Lebih disukai apabila pewawancara yang terpilih memiliki latar belakang pendidikan sarjana di bidang antropologi, sosiologi, kelautan dan perikanan, atau pewawancara yang memiliki pengalaman dan keterampilan melakukan wawancara. d. Lebih disukai apabila pewawancara mengetahui kondisi masyarakat Sungai Pisang.

C. Prosedur umum pelaksanaan wawancara a. Tim pewawancara independen akan mewawancarai responden sesuai dengan prosedur yang tertulis dalam KAK monitoring persepsi di KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat ini. b. Jika anggota rumah tangga tidak berada ditempat, maka pewawancara harus mencoba sebanyak 3 kali untuk mendapatkan data tentang rumah tangga yang telah dipilih tersebut. Apabila upaya ini gagal, maka pewawancara selanjutnya menggantinya dengan rumah tangga lainya berdasarkan daftar rumah tangga yang telah ditentukan oleh POKJA KKP. Orang yang diwawancarai untuk survey rumah tangga tidak harus kepala keluarga, tetapi harus berusia antara 15 sampai 59 tahun. c. Jika individu dalam rumah tangga yang terpilih tidak berada ditempat, pewawancara harus mencoba sebanyak 3 kali untuk datang mewawancarainya. Pewawancara harus menanyakan kepada anggota keluarga yang ada dirumah saat wawancara tentang perkiraan waktu kapan orang yang telah terpilih untuk diwawancarai berada dirumah. Selanjutnya pewawancara akan mendatangi rumah tersebut sesuai dengan waktu yang disebutkan oleh anggota rumah tangga tersebut. Apabila upaya ini gagal maka pewawancara harus melaporkannya dalam buku catatan. d. Apabila pewawancara hanya bisa mewawancarai satu dari dua orang yang harus diwawancarai dalam rumah tangga (laki-laki saja atau perempuan saja), maka pewawancara harus tetap melaporkan data ini ke koordinator dan Outreach, POKJA KKP disertai dengan catatan singkat dalam sebuah buku catatan.

27


e. Apabila hanya terdapat satu orang laki-laki dan satu orang perempuan dalam rumah tangga, maka pewawancara langsung mewawancarai keduanya untuk wawancara perorangan. f.

POKJA KKP akan memilih tambahan 10 rumah tangga secara acak dan menambahkannya kedalam daftar rumah tangga yang akan diwawancarai di setiap desa sebagai cadangan apabila rumah tangga yang telah dipilih tidak dapat dihubungi, atau wawancara yang dilakukan tidak lengkap.

g. Tim pewawancara terdiri dari 10 orang dengan level pengalaman dan keterampilan yang relatif sama dalam pengumpulan data dan analisis. Tim yang memiliki level keterampilan dan pengalaman yang relatif sama adalah penting untuk memastikan pengumpulan dan interpretasi data dilakukan secara konsisten. h. Independensi pewawancara adalah penting karena responden yang mengira bahwa pewawancara adalah bagian dari POKJA KKP mungkin akan memberikan jawaban yang bias. Ini dapat diartikan bahwa responden mungkin akan ragu-ragu dalam menyampaikan pendapat yang kurang baik tentang program/kegiatan yang berhubungan dengan POKJA KPP dan mungkin akan mengarang jawaban untuk sekedar menyenangkan pewawancara. i.

Dalam memperkenalkan diri kepada responden, pewawancara akan mengatakan bahwa: kami adalah tim pewawancara independen (tidak terikat pada kelompok/organisasi tertentu) berjumlah 3 orang bermaksud untuk mendapatkan masukan dari bapak/ibu tentang kondisi, pemanfaatan dan pengelolaan sumberdaya alam laut di sekitar KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Kami berbagi tugas untuk melakukan wawancara di Desa Sungai Pisang.

j.

Sebelum kegiatan persepsi monitoring dimulai, POKJA KKP menyampaikan surat pemberitahuan kegiatan kepada MUSPIKA Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang (musyawarah pimpinan kecamatan) serta unsur-unsur terkait.

k. Sebelum memulai kegiatan wawancara, tim pewawancara terlebih dahulu melapor ke Camat dan aparat desa untuk memperoleh izin (surat pengantar) untuk melakukan wawancara di desa tersebut. l.

Pewawancara harus melaporkan hal-hal yang ditemui secara obyektif tanpa ada beban meskipun pewawancara menemukan berbagai isu yang kurang baik tentang KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat.

m. Program monitoring persepsi di wilayah KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat akan dimulai pelaksanaannya pada bulan Juni, 2015. Pelaksanaan program monitoring persepsi selanjutnya akan dilakukan kembali pada tahun 2017. Setelah itu, pelaksanaan survey selanjutnya akan ditentukan kemudian setelah pengulangan survey yang pertama. Pengambilan keputusan akan lebih didasarkan kepada keperluan program. Sebagai panduan utama adalah apabila POKJA KKP yakin bahwa program pengelolaan akan berdampak penting dalam waktu yang singkat, maka survey lanjutan dapat dilaksanakan dalam tenggang waktu 12 hingga 18 bulan kemudian. Di lain pihak apabila program pengelolaan dirasakan akan berdampak penting dalam waktu yang relatif lama, maka survey lanjutan dapat dilaksanakan dalam waktu 24 sampai 36 bulan berikutnya.

D. Desain daftar pertanyaan (kuesioner) a. Ada dua jenis kuesioner yang akan dibuat:  

kuesioner untuk rumah tangga kuesioner untuk survey individu laki-laki dan perempuan

b. Kuesioner rumah tangga akan dikembangkan untuk mengetahui karakteristik rumah tangga di dalam masyarakat diwilayah survey. Indikator demografi rumah tangga seperti yang

28


tertera dalam SocMon manual (Table 4.2: Household interview indicators) akan disertakan dalam kuesioner. c. Kuesioner individu untuk laki-laki dan perempuan akan dikembangkan untuk mengetahui pengetahuan, sikap, dan tingkah laku individu responden terhadap status, pemanfaatan dan pengelolaan sumberdaya alam laut. Indikator sikap dan persepsi yang tertera dalam SocMon manual (Table 4.2: Household interview indicators) akan disertakan dalam kuesioner. d. Sikap dan tingkah laku responden akan diukur dengan menggunakan jenis daftar pertanyaan Likert (Likert-type questions). Responden akan diminta untuk memberikan nilai terhadap pendapat mereka dalam berbagai kisaran skala, misalkan 1 hingga 10 dan akan diminta untuk menunjukkan apabila mereka sangat setuju, setuju, tidak tahu, tidak setuju, atau sangat tidak setuju terhadap pernyataan-pernyataan dan pertanyaan-pertanyaan tertentu. HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN

A. Hasil Berdasarkan hasil wawancara yang dilakukan kepada 14 (empat belas) Responden RT dan 22 (dua puluh dua) responden Individu, tingkat pendidikan masayarakt berdasarkan jenis kelamin, adalah sebagai berikut : Tabel 1. Tingkat Pendidikan Masyarakat Tingkat Pendidikan Jenis Kelamin

SD

SMP

SMA

Pria

5

3

1

Wanita

8

4

1

Secara lebih jelas perbandingan dapat dilihat pada Gambar di bawah ini.

SD

SMA

SMP

Gambar 1: Tingkat Pendidikan Masyarakat Sungai Pisang

29


Banyak permasalahan di laut dan pesisir dalam kawasan konservasi tersebut, seperti banyaknya sampah, keterbatasan air tawar, berkurangnya jumlah tangkapan nelayan yang dirasakan oleh masyarakat. Berdasarkan hasil wawancara menurut masyarakat setempat penyebab utama terjadi masalah lingkungan tersebut sebagaimana yang terlihat pada gambar berikut. Tabel 2: Penyebab Penyebab Utama Kerusakan Lingkungan Laut dan Pesisir di Sungai Pisang No.

Penyebab Utama

Jumlah Orang yang menyatakan

1.

Masyarakat Desa

12

2.

Nelayan Luar

5

3.

Camat

1

4.

Tidak Tahu

4

Jika dipersentasekan persepsi masyarakat terhadap Penyebab Utama Kerusakan Lingkungan Lauat dan Pesisir, 55 % masyarakat menyatakan bahawa penyebab utama terjadinya masalah lingkungan tersebut adalah Masyarakat desa sendiri, 23 % oleh nelayan luar dan 4 % Camat. Namun 18 % masyarakat tidak tahu siapa penyebab utama permalahan lingkungan tersebut.

30


Gambar 2: Persentase Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Penyebab Masalah di Laut dan Pesisir KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang Sementara menurut masyarakat Sungai Pisang yang bisa mengatasi permasalah tersebut di atas adalah sebagaimana gambar berikut.

Gambar: Prosentase Pihak yang dianggap dapat Mengatasi Masalah Kerusakan Lingkungan Laut dan Pesisir

B. Pembahasan Berdasarkan hasil survey yang telah dilakukan, terlihat bahwa sebagian besar responden pendidikannya hanya sampai SD, dan dilakukan elaborasi terhadap data, diantara responden tersebut ada yang tidak sampai tamat SD. Hal ini berpengaruh terhadap pola fikir dan prilaku mereka, dimana 55 % penyebab masalah kerusakan lingkungan laut dan pesisir di KKP Taman pulau kecil Kota Padang adalah masyarakat di sekitar kawasan itu sendiri. Di samping itu menurut responden, cukup besar juga pengaruh datangnya nelayan dari luar desa terhadap terjadinya kerusakan lingkungan. 23 % dari responden menyatakan nelayan luar merupakan penyebab utama kerusakan/permasalahan lingkungan yang ada. Hal ini bisa difahami, dan diterima karena biasannya prilaku masyarakat/nelayan dari luar wilayah tersebut kurang merasa memiliki terhadap

31


sumberdaya yang ada. Kecenderungannya adalah mengambil/memanfaatkan sumberdaya tanpa memikirkan aspek keberlanjutan. Dari permasalahan yang ada tersebut, Responden berharap masyarakat dan Pihak Pemerintah, Walikota, Aparat Keamanan, Camat dan Kelurahan dapat mengatasinya. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat masih sangat percaya bahwa pemerintah dengan kebijakan dan anggaran, serta melibatkan masyarakat setempat dapat memperbaiki lingkungan Laut dan Pesisir. Hal ini mengindikasi bahwa masyarakat di kawasan tersebut mau bekerja sama dengan pemerintah untuk memperbaiki dan meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan. KESIMPULAN 1. Sebagian besar Responden berpendidikan SD (59 %). 2. Tingkat Pendidikan mempengaruhi Pola Pikir dan Prilaku masayarakat dalam bertindak. REKOMENDASI 1. Perlu Perlu Sosialisasi lebih intensif tentang adanya kawasan konservasi Perairan 2. Perlu Peningkatan pengetahuan dan kesadaran akan pentingnya Kawasan konservasi 3. Melibatkan masyarakat secara aktif dalam kegiatan-kegiatan terkait dengan upaya memperbaiki dan meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan 4. Pemerintah secara aktif bersinergi dalam meningkatkan kapasitas masyarakat dalam pengembangan kawasan Lampiran 1. Nama dan nomor identifikasi pewawancara program monitoring persepsi di KKP Taman Pulau Kecil Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat dan Instansi No. id

Nama

Jenis Kelamin

Instansi/Lembanga dan Alamat

NP 1

NOFARIANTY, S.Hut., M.Si

PEREMPUAN

DINAS KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN KAB. PADANG PARIAMAN

NP 2

RISKA EKA PUTRI, S.Pi., M.Si

PEREMPUAN

DINAS KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN KOTA PADANG

NP 3

NADIA AMALINA DANIEL, S.Pi

PEREMPUAN

LOKA KKPN PEKANBARU

32


Appendix V

Individual questionnaire

33


Appendix VI

Household questionnaire

34


35


36


Appendix VII Temporary training certificate

37


Appendix VIII Training completion certificate

38

BOBLME-2015-Ecology-33

Recommend Documents